The impact of local sources and meteorological factors on and particulate matter concentrations
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:861.23 KB
- 文档页数:8
The impact of local sources and meteorological factors on nitrogen oxide and particulate matter concentrations:A case study of the Day of Atonement in IsraelUri Dayan a ,*,Yigal Erel b ,Jacob Shpund b ,Levana Kordova c ,Arye Wanger d ,James J.Schauer eaDepartment of Geography,The Hebrew University,Mt.Scopus,91905Jerusalem,Israel bInstitute of Earth Sciences,The Hebrew University,Givat Ram,91904Jerusalem,Israel cMinistry of Environmental Protection,125Menachem Begin Rd.,Tel Aviv 61071,Israel dAdam Teva VaDin (IUED),48Yehuda Ha-Levi St.,Tel Aviv 65115,Israel eCivil and Environmental Engineering,University of Wisconsin-Madison,WI 53706,USAa r t i c l e i n f oArticle history:Received 24April 2010Received in revised form 6January 2011Accepted 3February 2011Keywords:PM NO xPollution sourcesShort-lived pollutants Long-lived pollutantsa b s t r a c tMeasurements of the atmospheric concentrations of NO x and particulate matter (PM)in three urban centers in Israel before,during,and after the Day of Atonement were performed for nine consecutive years (2000e 08).This enabled to investigate the signi ficance of local versus long-range sources of pollution and probe the effect of meteorological conditions (synoptic systems,ventilation rates,height of surface boundary layer,and wind speed)on level of pollution.During the Day of Atonement all traf fic and most of the industrial activities cease in the Jewish populated parts of the country.We observed that in spite of this,concentrations of particulate matter (PM 2.5and PM 10)are very similar in all three urban centers during the Day of Atonement to the days before and after.Moreover,PM levels during the Day of Atonement are generally higher during Red Sea trough synoptic conditions which carry air from the Saudi and Jordanian deserts in the east and southeast relative to Persian Trough synoptic conditions which bring air from the eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea region in the north-west.In addition,55%of the variation in PM values during the nine days of Atonement included in this study can be explained by changes in ventilation rates of the atmosphere,namely the product of the mixing depth and a representative boundary layer wind speed.Thus,long-range sources and local mixing conditions determine the concentrations of PM in the atmosphere of Israel as expected from their long residence time.On the other hand,NO x concentrations during the Day of Atonement are signi ficantly lower than the days before and after,re flecting NO x short residence time in the atmosphere and the strong in fluence of local emission sources.Furthermore,the difference in concentrations of NO x in different Days of Atonement cannot be accounted for either by different synoptic conditions or by variations in ventilation rates,height of surface boundary layer,and wind speed.They are determined by the combination of local and regional sources of emission and the meteorological conditions which control their transport from these nearby sources to the sampling station.Ó2011Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.1.IntroductionThe concentrations of air pollutants in the tropospheric boundary layer are determined by the interactions between emis-sion fluxes and synoptic circulation types as well as regional wind flow pattern induced by mesoscale meteorological processes (i.e.,land e sea breeze).Each synoptic type dictates the long-range transport and a distinctive air mass affecting dispersion condi-tions (Kulmala et al.,2000)while mesoscale meteorology controlthe transport of regional air pollution.These interactions between long-range and air movements on the regional scale,were used to explain the concentrations of air pollutants in several regions of the world including the eastern Mediterranean (e.g.,Dayan and Graber,1981;Koch and Dayan,1992;McKendry,1994;Moulin et al.,1998;Shwarzhoff and Reid,2000;Yarnal et al.,2001;Kahana et al.,2002;Dayan and Levy,2002;Dayan et al.,2007).The signi ficance of transboundary air pollution contribution to the local or regional budget of atmospheric pollution has been recognized in the last decade.Studies based on trajectory models and recent developments in satellite remote sensing technologies and on chemical and isotopic tracers resulted in the ability to observe major pollution events in which,foreign sources contribute*Corresponding author.Tel.:þ97225883340;fax:þ97225820549.E-mail address:msudayan@mscc.huji.ac.il (U.Dayan).Contents lists available at ScienceDirectAtmospheric Environmentjournal homep age:www.elsevi/locate/atmosenv1352-2310/$e see front matter Ó2011Elsevier Ltd.All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.017Atmospheric Environment 45(2011)3325e 3332non-trivial amounts of pollution especially to the atmosphere in countries where local emission have declined(Xiao-Yang et al., 2007;Zhao et al.,2007;Avise et al.,2008).Israel is known to receive significant contribution of atmospheric pollution from foreign sources in addition to local sources(Wanger et al.,2000; Matvev et al.,2002;Erel et al.,2002,2006,2007;Falkovich et al., 2004;Rudich et al.,2008).This is especially applicable tofine (PM2.5and PM10)atmospheric particles which have long residence time in the atmosphere.The estimation mean-residence time of atmospheric aerosols as applied to particles in the lower atmo-sphere below precipitation cloud levels is about eight days (Papastefanou,2006).The Day of Atonement is observed in Israel every fall(either in September or October).During this day,all motorized trans-portation and most of the industrial activities in the Jewish parts of the country cease for24h,hence,it provides a unique opportunity to test the relative contribution of pollution sources within urban centers versus regional and foreign sources.Previous studies have observed significant reduction in atmospheric pollution in Israel during the Day of Atonement(e.g.,Mamane et al.,1981;Stanhill and Moreshet,1992).The later have analyzed the reduction in insolation in Beit Dagan,Israel,as related to motor traffic,but have not measured the impacts of such traffic on air pollutant concen-trations(trace gases and particulates).Moreover,they did not relate theirfindings to meteorological conditions.The former study conducted by Mamane et al.(1981)has not dealt with synoptic conditions and meteorological parameters in tandem with pollutant concentrations,but rather used the soiling index as surrogate for trace gases and particulates.Measurements at an air quality monitoring station in the center of Tel Aviv have shown that on this day the soiling index,a measure of the concentration of particles of anthropogenic origin,was less than10%of that measured during the preceding and following seven days(Mamane et al.,1981).These observations are interesting in light of the well documented“ozone weekend effect”where urban areas might have higher ozone(a secondary pollutant)concentrations on weekends than on weekdays although NO x(primary pollutant) emissions are usually lower during weekends(Cleveland et al., 1974;Lebron,1975;Marr and Harley,2002a,b;Blanchard and Tanenbaum,2003;Fujita et al.,2003;Heuss et al.,2003;Pun et al.,2003;Murphy et al.,2007;Tonse et al.,2008;Yarwood et al.,2008).In addition,it was shown lately that during week-days the concentrations of EC(elemental carbon),TC(total carbon), certain metals,and the ultrafine(0.05e0.14m m)and coarse (1.2e10m m)fractions of suspended particulate matter in an urban center in Germany are higher than during weekends when traffic density is30%lower(Bruggemann et al.,2009).Also,Khoder and Hassan(2008)report higher weekdays TSP levels in Cairo relative to weekends(454m g mÀ3on weekdays and298m g mÀ3on weekends).In the current study we use measurements of several atmo-spheric pollutants(NO x,PM,O3,SO2)prior,during,and after the Day of Atonement in three urban centers in the country in nine consecutive years from2000to2008in order to quantify the impact of local urban versus regional and foreign sources on the concentrations of these pollutants which vary in their atmospheric fate and residence time.We also examine the effect of meteoro-logical conditions on the ratio between local and foreign sources.During the part of the year when the Day of Atonement is celebrated(September,October)one of the following two synoptic systems prevail in the region,(1)a Persian Gulf trough or(2)Red Sea trough.Persian Gulf trough is a surface thermal barometric trough,extending from the south-west Asian Monsoon.The Persian Gulf Trough begins to occur in the middle of June and remains until October.Because of its thermal origin its height is restricted to about500e1500m,above which dominates an extension of the subtropical high pressure system(Dayan et al.,2002).The transi-tional zone between these two pressure systems defines an inver-sion layer.In general,aerosol loading in the Eastern Mediterranean troposphere associated with this system is characterized by low variability from day to day(Dayan and Levy,2005).Red Sea trough is an extension of a low surface pressure from a tropical depression toward the Red Sea,which sometimes penetrates up north as far as Turkey.Its energy and humidity sources are from the tropical regions and it migrates along a mostly North-South direction.It is especially frequent during the autumn season and generates east-erly surface winds which might transport dust from Jordan and Saudi Arabia toward the eastern Mediterranean.2.Experimental methodsAtmospheric measurements used in the study were collected from three urban centers in Israel(Fig.1).In the Tel Aviv area,the most populated region in the country which is located in the coastal plain,we used data collected from two stations,one in a regular middle class neighborhood(Yad Avner),and one from abusyFig.1.Map of Israel and the major urban centers,Tel Aviv,Jerusalem,and Beersheba included in the present study.Blue arrows mark the synoptic-scale wind directions during Persian Trough condition,and brown arrows mark the synoptic-scale wind directions during Red Sea trough conditions.(For interpretation of the references to color in thisfigure legend,the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)U.Dayan et al./Atmospheric Environment45(2011)3325e3332 3326intersection in one of the most religious towns in Israel(Remez,in Bnei Brak).One station is located in Jerusalem,approximately 60km in-land,700m asl,and one station is from Beersheba,in the semi-arid part of the country,approximately50km from the coastal plain,and at200m asl.The air monitoring stations operated by the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection measure several major pollutants: particulate matter(PM10at Yad Avner,Jerusalem,and Beersheba and PM2.5in Remez),sulfur dioxide(SO2),nitrogen oxides(NO x),carbon monoxide(CO),and ozone(O3).The analytical monitors in each station are fully automated and employed U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)approved methods and procedures.The monitors were equipped with daily automated calibration systems. Once a year,the stations conduct quality control and quality assur-ance tests.Sulfur dioxide is measured by Fluorescence SO2analyzer (Thermo Environmental Instruments A,Model43C).Nitrogen dioxide is determined by Chemiluminescence NO e NO2e NO x analyzer(Thermo,Model42C).Ozone is measured by U.V.Photo-metric O3Analyzer(Thermo,Model49C).Carbon monoxide is measured by Gas Filter Correlation(GFC)CO Analyzer(Thermo, Model48C).PM10and PM2.5are measured by Verewa Extractive Beta Gauge Particulate Monitor(Durag A,Model F-701).3.ResultsSynoptic classification reveals that during the Day of Atonement of2001,2004,2006,and2007Persian trough synoptic system prevailed,accompanied by westerly winds;while the Day of Atonement of2000,2002,2003,2005,and2008experienced weak easterly winds generated by the Red Sea Barometric trough (Table1).A common methodology to assess the dispersion condi-tions of the atmosphere over the region is by calculating the ventilation rates(VR e Table1).This term is the mixed layer depth multiplied by the mean wind speed in the mixed layer,representing the ability of the atmosphere to dilute and transport contaminants away from a source region.The results obtained prior,during,and after the Day of Atonement indicate that NO x and PM represent the two extreme cases,where NO x,which is emitted mostly from combustion sources,displays the largest reduction in concentrations during the Day of Atonement relative to the days before and after,while PM vary the least(Table2; Figs.2and3).NO x values decrease during the Day of Atonement,and the ratio of the average NO x values during the Day of Atonement and either the day before or after is always lower than one(Table2).These daily variations are,by far,larger than the inter-annual variations in NO x concentrations measured in Remez(Tel Aviv area).The relative standard deviation for the former,calculated for the period2000e08 is0.18as compared to the much larger value of0.57obtained for the later.The average ratio values of NO xðthe ratio of NO x during the Day of Atonement and the day before¼NO xDA=NO xbeforeand the ratio of NO x during the Day of Atonement and the day after¼NO x DA=NO xafterÞduring the nine years included in this study change from one station to the other.The station with the lowest ratio is as expected the Remez station in the Tel Aviv area.This is because it is the most polluted station during most of the year,located near a major road.NO xDA=NO xbeforeand NO xDA=NO xaftervalues are approxi-mately0.10in Remez,0.25in Yad Avner(both in the Tel Aviv urban center),0.45in Beersheba,and0.50in Jerusalem(Table2).The same trend and more or less the same ratios hold for the lowest and highest values of NO x measured in each station(Table2).During the Day of Atonement a substantial decrease in emis-sions is observed.Newmark(2007)found that in Tel Aviv city buses produce39% of the PM emissions.Trucks and taxis contribute,each,a quarter of the total PM emissions.Since all motorized transportation cease for 24h in the whole country during this day,it seems evident that such a substantial decrease occurs in all major towns of Israel.PM concentrations on average do not change in spite of this substantial decrease in emissions during the Day of Atonement.The PM DA/PM before and PM DA/PM after values range between0.66and 1.27,with no significant difference between the stations.In general, PM DA/PM before and PM DA/PM after are higher during Red Sea trough synoptic conditions as compared with Persian Trough synoptic conditions(Tables1and2).4.DiscussionThe decreases in NO x concentrations observed in the current study resemble results obtained in previous studies.For example, the reduction in NO x concentrations in Remez is very similar to the concentration reduction reported by Wanger(1999)for the1998 Day of Atonement.Ozone concentrations show a mirror image of the NO x,and on certain Atonement Days have higher values than the days before of after(Table2).As explained by numerous studies,O3concentrations are sometimes expected to increase during days of reduced traffic as ozone production depends on a combination of several factors,including time profiles of ozone precursors(NO x and VOCs),their relative ratios,water vapor content,solar UV intensity,and meteorological conditions(Dayan and Levy,2002).This phenomenon(the ozone weekend effect) was observed more than30years ago(e.g.,Cleveland et al.,1974; Lebron,1975;Tonse et al.,2008).Hence,we focus on NO x and PM concentrations and compared24-h averages,and ten(for NO x)and three(for PM)lowest and highest values of the day prior,during, and after Day of Atonement(Table2).The difference between the three urban centers in NO xDA=NO xbefore and NO xDA=NO xaftervalues(0.10in Remez,0.25in Yad Avner(both in the Tel Aviv urban center),0.45in Beersheba,and0.50in JerusalemTable1Classification of nine Days of Atonement along synoptic categorization and local potential conditions for dispersion.Date Inv.base BD12Z height(m)Wind speed BD12Z(m sÀ1)Vent.rates WS BD(m2sÀ1)Synoptic catThursday:9e10/10/081460 3.04380Red Sea trough Saturday:21e22/09/07766 3.632781Persian trough(modal) Monday:01e02/10/061768 4.057160Persian trough(deep) Thursday:12e13/10/05476 5.382561Red Sea trough Saturday:24e25/09/041276 3.584568Persian trough(deep) Monday:05e06/10/03466 3.51631Red Sea trough Monday:15e16/09/02323 4.251373ColeThursday:26e27/09/01614 4.52763Persian trough(modal) Monday:08e09/10/00284 5.381528Red Sea troughSources of data:Inversion base,wind speed and ventilation rates are from:/upperair/sounding.html.Synoptic Categories from:/cgi-bin/db_search/DBSearch.pl.BD¼Beit Dagan,the central meteorological station in Israel,located near the Tel Aviv urban center.U.Dayan et al./Atmospheric Environment45(2011)3325e33323327Table 2(a)Concentrations of NO x (ppb)and PM (m g m À3)of the lowest and highest values (ten for NO x ,and three for PM)during the Day of Atonement (DA)and the day before or after.(b)NO x and PM ratios of the same samples.Year/day RemezYad Avner Jerusalem Beersheba NO xPM 2.5NO xPM 10NO xPM 10NO xPM 10Before ADAfter Before ADAfter Before ADAfter Before ADAfter Before ADAfter Before AD After Before ADAfter Before AD After(a)Lowest 20088.10.3914 2.7 4.8 1.02 3.0161314200712 1.0922 5.3 4.111 2.50.81 4.0 3.61529117.6131714207.6 3.17.320112820068.90.8715 5.7 1.8 6.09.113217.4 3.18.5201317 6.2 4.0 6.2161624200519 2.712 3.31015 4.2 1.9 2.922 4.41411 4.0 6.21731318.3 5.77.32631312004120.7517 6.4 4.47.1 6.5 1.4228.4 4.07.8131115 5.9 3.2 5.9191016200310 6.112 4.2 2.3 4.721202711 4.91126315111 3.4 5.6343037200221 2.530101015 2.9 2.47.01934267.4 4.17.2266436 6.0 3.07.61740572001211.223212724 5.8 3.9 6.148472012 2.9 3.85561437.2 3.1 4.133373020009.1 3.7 3.9 4.3 1.7 3.8259.3136 4.510262842 4.7 1.6 2.5221115Highest 20087714 6.99.45616603812322007899.41361916348411634838624629312435291931433557200648 6.610182336648305418 6.0355********.4235828442005119298823294967 6.4408813279514526575373291318504844200413116129611153564053211637453337258.0244535492003242924441569727374343075611111248.5 5.7208280712002101223643356353710135869712823139552120174259.44069891212001130241171307546458.2317569812611291009987279.4145563582000423625587.7437212073211137957687241014997355Ratios Year/dayRemez Yad Avner Jerusalem Beersheba NO x PM 2.5NO x PM 10NO x PM 10NO x PM 10DA/beforeDA/afterDA/beforeDA/afterDA/beforeDA/afterDA/beforeDA/afterDA/beforeDA/afterDA/beforeDA/afterDA/beforeDA/afterDA/beforeDA/after(b)Average 20080.140.510.230.270.460.640.360.560.520.800.360.420.400.6120070.090.06 1.070.540.110.130.790.520.270.310.710.640.440.460.710.5220060.120.060.450.470.820.560.340.190.490.630.600.400.610.5720050.190.29 1.380.710.120.34 1.03 1.160.66 1.30 1.320.860.530.73 1.050.9720040.080.090.290.230.710.520.510.370.800.770.400.370.650.722003 1.030.930.310.29 1.050.890.530.34 1.430.740.290.350.960.9620020.160.07 1.26 1.090.350.11 1.510.800.610.22 2.45 1.010.470.31 1.760.6720010.150.170.96 1.340.250.510.93 1.040.320.410.97 1.180.310.56 1.030.9620000.74 1.110.160.28 1.05 1.210.590.310.880.870.340.570.76 1.07Average 0.130.120.930.890.230.270.930.820.470.44 1.060.830.420.460.880.78Stdev 0.040.070.330.320.090.130.290.270.140.340.610.170.100.130.390.21Lowest 20080.050.190.210.340.790.9120070.090.050.770.370.330.20 4.020.510.670.580.840.700.400.420.570.4020060.100.060.310.30 1.470.650.420.370.670.770.640.650.990.6720050.140.22 3.000.670.440.640.200.320.350.64 1.820.990.680.78 1.18 1.0020040.060.040.700.620.210.060.480.520.820.700.550.540.510.6020030.600.530.550.490.950.730.440.43 1.220.610.300.610.870.8220020.120.09 1.000.670.820.34 1.79 1.330.560.57 2.42 1.770.490.39 2.360.7020010.060.05 1.34 1.150.680.650.97 2.290.240.76 1.12 1.420.430.74 1.12 1.2620000.400.940.390.440.370.720.340.640.500.77Average 0.090.080.950.660.560.48 1.250.830.450.55 1.270.990.480.60 1.010.78Stdev 0.030.070.910.310.180.17 1.260.700.140.130.630.440.140.140.610.26Highest 20080.19 1.360.280.260.310.3720070.100.070.840.470.130.170.790.610.790.700.640.610.810.6220060.140.070.410.500.620.550.330.170.460.710.630.320.480.6320050.240.33 1.270.590.100.16 1.51 1.670.89 1.730.930.720.450.740.97 1.0820040.120.130.190.210.700.750.750.430.730.880.320.330.790.722003 1.23 1.230.330.21 1.020.990.880.40 1.810.890.670.290.98 1.1220020.210.06 1.70 1.600.280.08 1.120.750.560.14 2.290.690.370.24 1.290.7320010.180.200.58 1.630.180.270.920.860.440.400.99 1.140.350.69 1.15 1.1020000.85 1.440.130.18 1.67 1.630.410.700.74 1.33Average 0.170.14 1.03 1.070.190.18 1.040.980.640.55 1.140.820.480.490.900.92Stdev0.050.110.430.530.090.060.380.440.230.590.660.160.140.210.250.27U.Dayan et al./Atmospheric Environment 45(2011)3325e 33323328(Table 2))probably re flects population differences.Whereas the Tel Aviv area has a vast majority of Jews (98.7%;CBS,2010),and hence there is very little traf fic,Beersheba is located between Gaza Strip and the southern part of the West Bank (Fig.1),and might be getting pollution from there during the Day of Atonement.Jerusalem and its vicinity are inhabited by both Jews and Arabs (82.15and 17.1%,respectively;CBS,2010)and pollution emitted from cars in east Jerusalem and from other urban centers in the West Bank reaches Jerusalem during the Day of Atonement.Hence,our results suggest that approximately 10e 25%of the NO x load in Tel Aviv (similar to results obtained by Wanger,1999),45%in Beersheba and 50%in West Jerusalem originate from sources outside the urban centers them-selves.The large differences in NO x reduction between the urban centers are expected as NO x have low residence time in the atmo-sphere,less than 12h (Mamane et al.,1981;Wanger,1999).The reduction in NO x concentrations during the Day of Atonement in different years and the differences between the three urban centerscannot be explained by either,synoptic classi fications or by meso-scale meteorological conditions (i.e.,ventilation rate,inversion base height multiplied by wind speed)(Tables 1and 2,Figs.4and 5).For example,Remez (within the Tel Aviv urban center)and Jerusalem stations behave similarly and Remez station behaves differently than the other station (Yad Avner)within the Tel Aviv urban center (Fig.5).In both Remez and Jerusalem stations NO x DA =NO x before decreases as ventilation rates and inversion base heights increase,and NO x DA =NO x before increases when wind speed increases.In Beer-sheba NO x DA =NO x before increases with increasing ventilation rates,inversion base height,and wind speed (Fig.5).In Yad Avner (the other station within Tel Aviv),NO x DA =NO x before values do not change with ventilation rates,inversion base height,but slightly decrease with wind speed (Fig.5).These observations can be explained by the geographical settings and the types of neighborhood (i.e.,urban,suburban or rural)in which the stations are located.The lowest immediate sources of pollution are around Remez and the Jerusalem stations as both are located in religious neighborhoods where traf fic and industrial activities completely cease during the Day of Atone-ment.These stations are most sensitive to neighboring pollution sources carried by local winds (and expressed by wind speed)and being diluted when ventilation rates and inversion base height are high.Both monitoring stations,Remez (Bnei Brak)and Jerusalem are020406080100120c o n c e n t r a t i o nhalf hours19/9/0720/9/0721/9/0722/9/0723/9/0724/9/07Fig.2.Concentrations of PM 10(mgmÀ3),NOx(ppb),O 3(ppb),and SO 2(10Âppb)in the residential station,Yad Avner,in the Tel Aviv urban center in September 2007.The thick arrow marks the Day of Atonement.Fig.3.Column charts of the 24-h average concentration values of NO x (ppb)and PM (m g m À3)before,during and after the Day of Atonement for Remez (a),Yad Avner (b),Jerusalem(c)and Beersheba (d).0.02.04.06.08.010.012.0Avg NOxm (s e t a R .t n e V 2)c e s /Fig.4.The relationships between NO x concentrations (average values of the foururban stations)during the Day of Atonement and ventilation rates (inversion base height multiplied by wind speed)in the four stations.U.Dayan et al./Atmospheric Environment 45(2011)3325e 33323329Fig.5.The relationships between NO x ratios and(a)ventilation rates,(b)inversion base height,and(c)wind speed(WS)in the four stations.U.Dayan et al./Atmospheric Environment45(2011)3325e33323330located within road intersections and affected mainly by local traf fic.This is especially the case for Remez exposed often to pollutants emitted from the congested traf fic.The only difference between these stations is that the station in Jerusalem is much less polluted on regular days than Remez.Therefore,the average NO x DA =NO x before and NO x DA =NO x after are lower in Remez than in Jerusalem.The other station in Tel Aviv,is located in a residential neighborhood where values of NO x during regular days are low (Table 1)and there are no nearby or distant pollution sources during the Day of Atonement.The station in Beersheba is located down wind from either Gaza Strip or the southern part of the West Bank and hence receives more pollution during the Day of Atonement when the regional air velocity is high,as expressed by ventilation rate and boundary layer height,and less by local wind speed.These results demonstrate the complexity of predicting concentrations and changes in concentra-tions of short-lived pollutants in urban centers,as they undergo chemical transformations (e.g.,NO x e O 3titration,Sillman,1999),are affected by immediate sources around the stations,by other parts of the same urban center which are more polluted during the sampling campaign,and by more distant sources.The behavior of PM is entirely different than that of NO x .In all stations the nine-year average ratio of the PM values during the Day of Atonement and either the day before or after is always around unity (Table 2).PM concentrations sometimes increase during the Day of Atonement relative to either the day before or after (Table 2).In general,PM DA /PM before and PM DA /PM after are higher during Red Sea trough synoptic conditions which carry air from the Saudi and Jordanian deserts (east e southeast of Israel)relative to Persian Trough synoptic conditions which bring air from the eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea region in the north-west (Fig.1,Tables 1and 2).Furthermore,during 2004,2006,and 2007(all have Persian trough synoptic conditions)the ratios of PM during Day of Atonement and the days before and after are below one in all stations and PM DA /PM before and PM DA /PM after are very similar (with only a few exceptions;Table 2).Furthermore,in every station the average PM DA /PM before and PM DA /PM after values of the Persian trough synoptic conditions are lower than the average PM DA /PM before and PM DA /PM after values of the Red Sea conditions (Tables 1and 2).In addition,the average of PM DA /PM before and PM DA /PM after values of all stations during Persian trough synoptic conditions is 0.76Æ0.12while the average of PM DA /PM before and PM DA /PM after values of all stations during Red Sea synoptic condi-tions is 0.99Æ0.10(Tables 1and 2).These results are consistent with Dayan and Levy (2005)who found a signi ficant difference in PM concentrations over Israel for the different synoptic systems (RST as compared to PT).The expected effect of 24-h cease in PM emissions (based on PM residence time in the atmosphere)should be around 10%,within the uncertainty of our data,but much lower than the difference between the PM behavior during the two synoptic systems.This suggests that long-range sources play important role in deter-mining the concentrations of PM in the atmosphere of Israel as suggested by Erel et al.(2006,2007).Additionally,a clear effect of ventilation rate on PM load in the three urban centers during the nine years of the study is observed (Fig.6).Approximately 55%of the variation in PM load during Day of Atonement is accounted for by ventilation rate.This finding is in accordance with Matvev et al.(2002)who derived the long-term mean values of ventilation rates over Israel,its seasonal variation and impacts on pollutant concentrations.This effect is superimposed on the impact of long-range sources determined by synoptic conditions.Hence,the behavior of PM is clearly controlled by long-range transport as determined by the synoptic conditions and by the ability of the atmosphere to dilute and transport contaminants away from a source region manifested by local dispersion conditions.5.Summary and conclusionsThe Day of Atonement,during which,all traf fic and most industrial activities cease over Israel,provides a unique opportu-nity to distinguish between the behavior of short and long-lived pollutants and the impact of atmospheric conditions on such pollutants.This is demonstrated by the temporal behavior of their concentrations prior,during and after this special day.Conclusions derived from the analysis of the atmospheric concentrations of NO x and PM for a 9-yr period at three major urban centers in Israel are as follows:1)NO x and PM represent the two extreme cases where NO x displays the largest reduction in concentrations during the Day of Atonement relative to the days before and after,while PM vary the least.2)Variation in PM concentrations,as pollutant of long residence time,is more affected by long-range sources determined by speci fic synoptic con figurations,3)Diurnal varia-tion in NO x concentrations re flects its short residence time and the strong in fluence of local emission sources,4)As expected for a short-lived pollutants,large differences in NO x concentrations during the Day of Atonement were observed between the three urban centers.This study has presented further evidences on the complexity of assessing the day-by-day variations in concentrations of short-lived pollutants.ReferencesAvise,J.,et al.,2008.The impact of global changes on the long-range transport ofAsian emissions to the western United States,and the implications on regional air quality.In:10th Conference on Atmospheric Chemistry,the 88th AMS Annual Meeting New Orleans,LA,USA.Blanchard,C.L.,Tanenbaum,S.J.,2003.Differences between weekday and weekendair pollutant levels in southern California.Journal of the Air &Waste Management Association 53,816e 828.Bruggemann,E.,Gerwig,H.,Gnauk,T.,Muller,K.,Herrmann,H.,2009.In fluence ofseasons,air mass origin and day of the week on size-segregated chemical composition of aerosol particles at a kerbside.Atmospheric Environment 43,2456e 2463.Central Bureau of Statistics,2010.Statistical Abstract of Israel,2010.Cleveland,W.S.,Graedel,T.E.,Kleiner,B.,Warner,J.L.,1974.Sunday and workdayvariations in photochemical air-pollutants in New-Jersey and New-York.Science 186,1037e 1038.Dayan,U.,Graber,M.,1981.Analysis of synoptic conditions in the Eastern Medi-terranean that led to elevated air pollution concentrations in Israel.In:Shuval,H.(Ed.),Developments in Arid Zone Ecology and Environmental Quality.Balaban ISS,Philadelphia,pp.383e 397.Dayan,U.,Levy,I.,2002.Relationship between synoptic-scale atmospheric circu-lation and ozone concentrations over Israel.Journal of Geophysical Research 107(D24),4813.doi:10.1029/2002JD002147.Avg PMV e n t . R a t e s (m 2/s e c )Fig.6.The relationships between average PM load of the four stations during the Day of Atonement and ventilation rates (inversion base height multiplied by wind speed)in the four stations.U.Dayan et al./Atmospheric Environment 45(2011)3325e 33323331。