critical review

Critical Review怎么写Writing a Critical ReviewThe advice in this brochure is a general guide only. We strongly recommend that you also follow your assignment instructions and seek clarification from your lecturer/tutor if needed.Purpose of a Critical ReviewThe critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarize and evaluate a text. The critical review can be of a book, a chapter, or a journal article. Writing the critical review usually requires you to read the selected text in detail and to also read other related texts so that you can present a fair and reasonable evaluation of the selected text.What is meant by critical?At university, to be critical does not mean to criticize in a negative manner. Rather it requires you to question the information and opinions in a text and present your evaluation or judgment of the text. To do this well, you should attempt to understand the topic from different perspectives (i.e. read related texts) and in relation to the theories, approaches and frameworks in your course. What is meant by evaluation or judgment?Here you decide the strengths and weaknesses of a text. This is usually based on specific criteria. Evaluating requires an understanding of not just the content of the text, but also an understanding of a text’s purpose, the intended audience and why it is structured the way it is.What is meant by analysis?Analyzing requires separating the content and concepts of a text into their main components and then understanding how these interrelate, connect and possibly influence each other.Structure of a Critical ReviewCritical reviews, both short (one page) and long (four pages), usually have a similar structure. Check your assignment instructions for formatting and structural specifications. Headings are usually optional for longer reviews and can be helpful for the reader.IntroductionThe length of an introduction is usually one paragraph for a journal article review and two or three paragraphs for a longer book review. Include a few opening sentences that announce the author(s) and the title, and briefly explain the topic of the text. Present the aim of the text and summarize the main finding or key argument. Conclude the introduction with a brief statement of your evaluation of the text. This can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response.SummaryPresent a summary of the key points along with a limited number of examples. You can also briefly explain the author’s purpose/intentions throughout the text and you may briefly describe how the text is organized. The summary should only make up about a third of the critical review. CritiqueThe critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the text. Remember to base your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference).You can choose how to sequence your critique. Here are some examples to get you started: •Most important to least impor tant conclusions you make about the text.•If your critique is more positive than negative, then present the negative points first and thepositive last.•If your critique is more negative than positive, then present the positive points first and the negative last.•If there are both strengths and weakness for each criterion you use, you need to decide overall what your judgment is. For example, you may want to comment on a key idea in the text and have both positive and negative comments. You could begin by stating what is good about the idea and then concede and explain how it is limited in some way. While this example shows a mixed evaluation, overall you are probably being more negative than positive.•In long reviews, you can address each criteria you c hoose in a paragraph, including both negative and positive points. For very short critical reviews (one page or less) where your comments will be briefer, include a paragraph of positive aspects and another of negative.•You can also include recommendatio ns for how the text can be improved in terms of ideas, research approach; theories or frameworks used can also be included in the critique section. ConclusionThis is usually a very short paragraph.•Restate your overall opinion of the text.•Briefly prese nt recommendations.•If necessary some further qualification or explanation of your judgment can be included. This can help your critique sound fair and reasonable.ReferencesIf you have used other sources in you review you should also include a list of references at the end of the review.Summarizing and paraphrasing for the critical reviewSummarizing and paraphrasing are essential skills for academic writing and in particular, the critical review. To summarize means to reduce a text to its main points and its most important ideas. The length of your summary for a critical review should only be about one quarter to one third of the whole critical review. The best way to summarize is to:1.Scan the text. Look for information that can be deduced from the introduction, conclusion and the title and headings. What do these tell you about the main points of the article?2.Locate the topic sentences and highlight the main points as you read.3.Reread the text and make separate notes of the main points. Examples and evidence do not need to be included at this stage. Usually they are used selectively in your critique.Paraphrasing means putting it into your own words. Paraphrasing offers an alternative to using direct quotations in your summary (and the critique) and can be an efficient way to integrate your summary notes.The best way to paraphrase is to:1.Review your summary notes2.Rewrite them in your own words and in complete sentencese reporting verbs and phrases (eg; The author describes…, Smith argues that …).4.If you include unique or specialist phrases from the text, use quotation marks.。

critical review 模板标题：对xxx的批评性评价正文：一、引言如今，随着科技和社会的不断进步，人们对一切事物都有了更高的要求，对于产品、服务或者是创意，我们渴望看到更加出色的表现。

因此，本文将对xxx进行一次批评性的评价，提出一些问题和改进的建议。

二、背景在批评之前，首先我们需要明确xxx的背景和定位，这样我们才能有一个更加全面的了解和评价。

xxx是一家xxxx公司旗下的产品/服务，面向社会大众提供xxxxx，它的核心目标是（简要介绍）。

经过一段时间的观察和体验，下面将对其进行多个方面的评价。

三、界定问题在对xxx进行评价之前，我们需要先界定出评价的范围和问题，以保持评价的针对性和客观性。

我认为以下几个问题是最需要关注和改进的。

1. xxxxxxx在xxxx方面存在一定的问题，例如xxx。

这些问题导致了（影响），显然需要xxx进行改进。

2. xxxx另外，在xxxx方面，xxx存在着一些瑕疵。

例如xxx。

这些问题与xxxx存在一定的关联，表明了xxx在这一方面需要加强。

3. xxxx此外，在xxxx方面，xxx还有一些不足之处。

例如xxx。

这些问题显示了xxx在xxxx方面的不尽人意。

四、改进建议基于以上问题，下面给出一些建议，希望能够对xxx的未来发展有所启示。

1.建议一对于xxx方面的问题，我们建议xxx采取xxxx的措施。

例如xxx。

这样可以有效解决xxx问题，提升客户的满意度。

2.建议二针对xxxx方面的问题，建议xxx加强xxxx。

例如xxx。

通过这样的改进，xxx可以在xxxx方面有更出色的表现。

3.建议三对于xxxx方面的不足，我们建议xxx进行xxxx。

例如xxx。

这样可以提高xxx的竞争力，并满足日益提高的客户需求。

五、结论总之，本文对xxx进行了一次批评性的评价，并提出了一些问题和改进建议。

通过改进，相信xxx可以更好地满足客户需求，提升自身竞争力。

希望这些建议能够为xxx的进一步发展提供一些参考和启示。

critical review 模板-回复【Critical Review Template】Introduction:- Provide a brief overview of the topic and clearly state your main argument or focus.- Introduce the source or subject you will be reviewing.Section 1: Evaluation of the Source's Argument1.1: Identify the main argument:- Summarize the key points or main argument of the source you are reviewing.1.2: Assess the strength of the argument:- Evaluate the credibility and reliability of the evidence presented. - Consider the logical coherence and consistency of the argument. - Analyze the relevance and significance of the supporting evidence.- Determine if the argument is supported by sound reasoning or if it is flawed.1.3: Evaluate potential biases or limitations:- Identify any biases or potential conflicts of interest that may affect the credibility of the argument.- Assess any limitations in the evidence or methodology used.- Consider if there are any alternative perspectives that could challenge the argument.Section 2: Analysis of the Source's Methodology2.1: Assess the methodology used in the source:- Critically evaluate the research methods or approach used.- Consider the appropriateness and rigor of the methodology.- Evaluate if the methodology supports the generalizability and validity of the findings.2.2: Analyze the data and evidence:- Critically examine the data or evidence presented.- Assess the reliability and validity of the data or evidence.- Consider if there are any gaps or limitations in the data or evidence.Section 3: Discussion of the Source's Contribution and Implications3.1: Discuss the source's contribution to the field:- Evaluate the originality and significance of the source's findings or argument.- Assess if the source fills a gap in existing literature or provides new insights.3.2: Evaluate the implications and usefulness of the source:- Discuss the potential practical or theoretical implications of the source's findings.- Assess the relevance and usefulness of the source for future research, policy-making, or practical applications.Conclusion:- Recap your main argument or focus from the introduction.- Summarize your evaluation of the source's argument, methodology, and contribution.- Provide a final critical assessment or opinion on the overall value and quality of the source.Note: This template provides a general framework for writing a critical review. It is essential to adapt and modify the structurebased on the specific requirements or guidelines provided by your instructor or the expectations of the publication you are writing for.。

critical review写作要点摘要：一、引言1.介绍critical review 的概念2.阐述critical review 的重要性3.说明critical review 与普通评论的区别二、critical review 的写作要点1.确定评论对象2.收集相关信息3.明确评论目的和标准4.保持客观公正的态度5.结构清晰，逻辑严密6.使用恰当的语言和表达7.给出建设性的建议和意见三、critical review 的具体步骤1.阅读评论对象2.分析评论对象的特点和优缺点3.结合评论目的和标准进行评价4.提出改进意见四、撰写critical review 时应注意的问题1.避免主观臆断和情感色彩2.尊重他人观点，避免恶意攻击3.引用相关资料，支持观点4.注意篇幅和字数限制五、总结1.强调critical review 的重要性2.重申撰写critical review 的方法和技巧3.建议多进行实践，提高写作能力正文：Critical review，即批判性评论，是一种对某一作品、观点或现象进行深入分析、评价和提出意见的写作形式。

它在学术研究、文学作品、艺术创作等领域有着广泛的应用。

撰写一篇高质量的critical review，不仅需要对评论对象有深入的了解，还要掌握一定的写作技巧。

本文将结合critical review 的概念和特点，详细介绍撰写critical review 的要点和步骤。

首先，要进行critical review，需要明确评论的对象。

这可能是一篇论文、一部电影、一本书或者一个艺术作品。

在确定评论对象后，要收集与评论对象相关的背景信息、作者或创作者的简介，以及其他人对该作品或观点的评价等。

这些信息将为撰写critical review 提供丰富的素材。

其次，明确评论的目的和标准是撰写critical review 的关键。

评论的目的是对评论对象进行评价，还是提出改进意见？评论的标准是学术性、创新性、实用性，还是艺术性、观赏性、趣味性？根据评论的目的和标准，可以更有针对性地进行评价和提出意见。

IntroductionIn Man’s Search for Meaning, Viktor E. Frankl tells the very per sonal story of his experience as a prisoner in a concentration camp during the Holocaust. He presents this story in the form of an ess ay in which he shares his arguments and analysis as a doctor and psychologist as well as a former prisoner. This paper will review Fra nkl’s story as well as his main arguments, and will evaluate the qu ality of Frankl’s writing and focus on any areas of weakness within the story.SummaryThis section contains a summary of Man's Search. Frankl begins his book by stating that his purpose in writing the book is not to present facts and details of the Holocaust, but to provide a persona l account of the everyday life of a prisoner living in a concentration camp. He states, “This tale is not concerned with the great horror s, which have already been described often enough (though less oft en believed), but…it will try to answer this question: How was ever yday life in a concentration camp reflected in the mind of the aver age prisoner?”(21). Frankl then goes on to describe the three stag es of a prisoner’s psychological reactions to being held captive in a concentration camp.The first phase, which occurs just after the prisoner is admitted to the camp, is shock. The second phase, occurring once the priso ner has fallen into a routine within the camp, is one of apathy, or “the blunting of the emotions and the feeling that one could not anymore”(42). The third phase, which occurs after the prisoner ha s been liberated from the camp, is a period of “depersonalization”, in which “everything appears unreal, unlikely, as in a dream”(11 0). In this phase, released prisoners also feel a sense of “bitterness and disillusionment”when returning to their former lives (113). Fr ankl describes each of these phases using psychological theory and provides personal experiences to exemplify each of the stages.Author’s ArgumentsAs described above, Frankl’s main purpose for writing this book is to pr esent and analyze the average prisoner’s psychological reactions to the every day life of a concentration camp. His three main arguments are his presentat ion and analysis of each of the psychological stages that the average concent ration camp prisoner experiences: shock, apathy and depersonalization. He b ases his analyses of each of these stages on the actions of the prisoners and his own personal thoughts and reactions as he experienced life in a concent ration camp.For example, Frankl argues that the second phase of apathy forces “the prisoner’s life down to a primitive level”(47) in which “all efforts and all e motions were centered on one task: preserving one’s own life and that of t he other fellow”(47). He bases this theory on events he witnessed while livi ng in the camp himself, and states, “It was natural that the desire for food was the major primitive instinct around which mental life centered. Let us ob serve the majority of prisoners when they happened to work near each other and were, for once, not closely watched. They would immediately start discu ssing food”(48). Frankl continuously uses examples from his experiences in t he concentration camp to illustrate and strengthen his psychological argumen ts throughout the text.EvaluationThis section contains an evaluation of Frankl’s book. Firstly, the author i s a survivor of the Holocaust and was a prisoner of a concentration camp hi mself, which gives him the personal insight to be able to comment on the ps ychological conditions of an average prisoner. However, this also creates a bi as and because of his personal experience, he is unable to be entirely objecti ve in writing his analysis. Frankl acknowledges this bias in the beginning of his book, by stating, “Only the man inside knows. His judgments may not b e objective, his evaluations may be out of proportion. This is inevitable. An attempt must be made to avoid any personal bias, and that is the real difficu lty of a book of this kind”(24-25). Although he is aware of this bias, it crea tes a partiality that will sway the readers throughout his story and it serves a s a minor weakness in his writing style.A second weakness in Frankl’s writing is in the assumptions he sometim es makes to prove his point. He makes overarching generalizations several ti mes in his book, making statements that, although may have been true for hi mself and those around him, might not have been true for every prisoner in every concentration camp during the Holocaust. For example, in one instance, he says, “The prisoner of Auschwitz , in the first phase of shock, did not fear death”(37). It is very bold to say that no prisoner of Auschwitz, one of t he most well-known and deadly concentration camps of the Holocaust, did n ot fear death, as death was all around them and was a very real threat in th eir daily lives. Although he might have not feared death during his phase of shock, it is impossible for him to guarantee that no prisoner was at all fearf ul of death in this first psychological phase, and for him to make overarching assumptions like this is a weakness to the overall quality of his book.Finally, Frankl sometimes becomes too technical and verbose in his writin g style, which makes it very hard for the average reader to understand. One example of this is as follows. Frankl states, “I remember an incident when t here was an occasion for psychotherapeutic work on the inmates of a whole hut, due to an intensification of their receptiveness because of a certain exter nal situation”(102). This sentence, which is overly wordy and complicated, m akes it difficult for the average reader to understand exactly what he is sayin g. A reader can easily get frustrated when trying to decipher the author’s m eaning due to overly complicated language, and this is a third weakness of F rankl’s writing.ConclusionThis critical review has evaluated the book Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl. The psychological theories that Frankl presents are very inte resting and he does a good job of illustrating these theories with his own pe rsonal experiences. However, his writing is weakened by the presence of bias, the overarching assumptions he occasionally makes, and his sometimes overl y technical and verbose language.。

如何写一篇对比两篇文章的critical review
写一篇对比两篇文章的critical review，可以遵循以下步骤：
1. 确定主题和目的：首先，你需要明确你要对比的两篇文章的主题和你的写作目的。

这将有助于你选择适当的分析角度和重点。

2. 总结和概述两篇文章：在开始分析之前，先对两篇文章进行总结和概述。

这可以帮助你更好地理解文章的主题、论点、证据和结论，并确定需要进行重点对比的方面。

3. 比较和分析两篇文章：在这一步，你需要对比两篇文章在各个方面（如论点、证据、论证方法、结论等）的异同。

你可以分析其中一篇文章在某些方面的优点和另一篇文章在另一些方面的优点，或者指出其中一篇文章存在的问题而另一篇文章则没有。

4. 提出自己的观点：在对比分析的基础上，提出自己的观点和评价。

你可以认为其中一篇文章更具有说服力，或者两篇文章各有千秋，或者其中一篇文章存在严重问题需要改进。

同时，你可以给出自己的理由和依据。

5. 给出结论：在总结文章内容的基础上，给出自己的结论。

这可以是对两篇文章的整体评价，也可以是对其中一篇文章的高度赞扬或批评，或者是对未来研究的建议和展望。

6. 注意事项：在写critical review时，需要注意以下几点：首先，要尊重原作者的观点和成果，避免过于主观或攻击性的言辞；其次，要确保对两篇文
章的理解和分析是准确和客观的；最后，要给出自己的观点和评价时需要有充分的理由和依据支持。

以上是写一篇对比两篇文章的critical review的基本步骤和注意事项。

当然，具体写作时还需要根据具体情况进行调整和完善。

critical review 模板-回复中括号主题：critical review 模板文章内容：一步一步回答如下：步骤1：引言（Introduction）- 介绍被评论的内容及作者。

[critical review 模板]在引言部分，我会开始我的文章，首先简要介绍即将被评论的内容和作者，以及为什么选择对这个特定主题进行评论。

这一部分的目的是确保读者了解文章的背景，并对评论的范围有所了解。

在写引言时，我会声明自己的立场并说明我需要评论内容的原因。

步骤2：总结（Summary）- 对被评论内容的概述和摘要。

接下来，在总结部分，我会对被评论的内容进行概述，并提供一个简短的摘要。

这有助于读者了解我评论的核心要点，并为后续的分析和批评做好准备。

步骤3：分析（Analysis）- 对内容的具体特点和弱点进行讨论。

在分析部分，我将对被评论的内容进行详细的分析。

我会讨论其中的特点、亮点和弱点，并提供支持性的证据和引文，以证明我的观点。

我会根据信息的准确性、逻辑的连贯性和论据的可信度来评估被评论内容的质量和可靠性。

步骤4：批评（Critique）- 对内容的不足和问题进行深入批判。

在批评部分，我将进一步探讨被评论的内容的不足和问题，并给出自己的批判性观点。

我会提出自己的见解，说明作者可能忽略的关键因素，并对内容的缺陷和局限性进行讨论。

我会以逻辑和客观的方式表达我的批评，并给出合理的替代方案或建议。

步骤5：结论（Conclusion）- 对被评论内容的总结和评价。

最后，在结论部分，我将对整个评论进行总结，并给出自己对被评论内容的最终评价。

我将再次重申我的立场，并强调评论的重点。

我会简要回顾我之前提出的批评和建议，并再次强调为什么我认为这些观点是重要的。

步骤6：后续行动（Follow-up) - 对评论内容的影响和可能的发展进行展望。

最后，我会在后续行动部分对我的评论内容的影响和可能的发展进行展望。

我会探讨可能的解决方案和改进措施，并提出帮助改善作者和读者体验的建议。

critical review 模板-回复【critical review 模板】：以中括号内的内容为主题，写一篇1500-2000字文章，一步一步回答1. 引言段（introduction paragraph）：简要介绍写作的主题和写作目的。

对于模板的内容进行说明，并提出要评价的方面。

2. 模板的内容解释（explanation of the template）：对模板的每个部分进行详细的解释，确保读者理解每个部分的作用和目的。

3. 优点评价（evaluation of the strengths）：列出模板的优点，并逐一进行评价。

对于每个优点，提供实际的例子来支持评价。

注意使用清晰的语言和具体的细节来展示模板的优点。

4. 不足之处评价（evaluation of the weaknesses）：列出模板的不足之处，并分析这些不足的原因。

对于每个不足之处，提出可能的改进方法或建议。

5. 应用建议（application suggestions）：给读者一些使用模板的建议。

例如，如何充分利用模板的优点，避免不足之处，并进行个性化的调整和改进。

6. 总结段（conclusion paragraph）：总结对模板的评价，并提醒读者模板的适用范围和局限性。

重申写作目的，并鼓励读者积极应用模板。

7. 参考文献（reference list）：如果有引用外部内容或参考其他资源的话，在文章末尾提供完整的引用。

以上是一份【critical review 模板】的基本框架。

在实际写作时，可以按照这个框架的结构进行展开。

根据具体的主题和模板内容，逐步解释评价和提出建议。

充分对模板进行分析和思考，以确保文章的逻辑性和完整性。

同时，注重语言表达的准确性和具体性，以提高文章的可读性和说服力。

critical review 模板-回复中括号内的主题是“critical review 模板”。

下面是一步一步的回答。

首先，需要明确critical review的定义和目的。

Critical review是对一篇文章、一本书、一个学术研究或其他内容的批判性评论和评估。

其目的是分析和评价所评估内容的优点、缺点和局限性，为读者提供深入思考和评估的角度。

接下来，我们可以按照以下结构来撰写critical review模板文章：1. 引言部分：介绍评估内容的背景和重要性，并说明你的评估标准。

- 简要概括评估内容以及作者的主要论点和目的。

- 解释为什么评估内容对你的读者或领域是重要的。

2. 评估方法：说明你选择的评估方法和标准。

- 说明你评估内容的标准（例如逻辑一致性、证据支持、方法学可靠性等）。

- 解释你的评估方法和步骤（例如文献审查、实证研究、逻辑分析等）。

3. 评估内容的主要发现：根据你的评估标准，总结出评估内容的主要发现。

- 对评估内容的优点进行总结和分析。

- 对评估内容的缺点和局限性进行总结和分析。

- 列出评估内容的优点和缺点，并给出证据或例子来支持你的观点。

4. 总体评估：基于你的评估发现，给出一个总体评估和结论。

- 评估内容是否达到了作者的目的和读者的期望？- 评估内容是否贡献了新的见解或对领域有所帮助？- 总结评估内容的优点和缺点，并给出你的整体评估。

5. 结论：总结你的critical review，并给出进一步研究或评估的建议。

- 简要概括你的评估内容和结论。

- 提出进一步研究或评估的建议，以便读者可以深入了解该主题。

最后，需要注意以下几点：- 语言要清晰、简洁且有条理。

- 使用合适的证据来支持你的观点和评估。

- 避免主观情绪和个人偏见的影响，尽量客观公正地评估。

- 如果有必要，可以使用子标题和段落来组织你的文章。

总而言之，撰写critical review模板文章需要遵循上述步骤和注意事项，同时根据评估内容的特点和需求进行灵活调整。

critical的用法归纳一、Critical的基本含义和用法1. Critical作为形容词，最基本的含义是批评性的、挑剔的，表达对某事物或某人进行严格评判。

例如：The teacher gave me some critical feedback on my essay.（老师对我的文章给出了一些批评性的反馈。

）另外，critical还可以指某种临界状态或至关重要的事物。

2. Critical作为副词，意思是极其重要或决定性地。

例如：The medical team responded to the emergency in a critical manner.（医疗团队以至关重要的方式应对紧急情况。

）二、Critical在不同领域中的具体用法1. 学术研究领域：- 在学术论文中，critical review是指对文献、观点、理论等进行批判性分析和评价。

- Critical thinking是指通过深入观察和分析来推动创新思考和问题解决能力发展的能力。

- Critical theory是社会科学中一种批判性思考方法，通过关注权力结构和社会不平等来审查现有社会秩序。

2. 文学与艺术领域：- Critical response是指读者或观众对文学作品或艺术品的批评性回应。

- Critical analysis是对文学作品、电影、音乐等的深入分析和解释。

3. 商业与管理领域：- Critical path是项目管理中指定最关键、最重要任务的路径，即确定项目完成所需时间最长的路径。

- Critical success factors（CSF）是指实现组织战略目标所必不可少的关键因素。

4. 科技领域：- 在计算机科学中，critical section是一个代码块，在该代码块中任何时候只能被一个进程或线程访问，以保证数据同步和避免竞态条件。

三、Critical在日常生活中的运用1. 糖尿病治疗：对于患有糖尿病的人来说，血糖水平是至关重要的。