Compensation of Axes at Vertical Lathes

  • 格式:pdf
  • 大小:368.01 KB
  • 文档页数:6

Compensation of Axes at Vertical LathesJ. Marek1 and P. Blecha21 Technical director, TOSHULIN, a.s, Wolkerova 845, 768 24 Hulin, Czech Republicjiri.marek@toshulin.cz2 Brno University of Technology, FME, Institute of Production Machines,Systems and Robotics, Technicka 2896/2, Brno, Czech Republicblecha@fme.vutbr.czAbstract. If exacting and complicated technological operations are applied at ti-tanium machining, it is not acceptable to set positions of the particular motion axes at the machine tool with too big position uncertainty. For this reason, it is necessary to manufacture all components of motion axes very precisely. How-ever, manufacturing precision has some economic and technical limits. After the optimum limits are exceeded, it is useful to perform electronic compensation of mechanical motion elements. This paper describes the essential principles of mechatronic compensation and it also shows some practical results.1 IntroductionUncertainty at manufacture of important parts, especially for such industrial branches as aviation, power engineering and transport, represents a great problem leading to technical and financial damages. There are several possibilities how to minimize the working and manufacturing uncertainty of the machine tools used for manufacture of exacting workpieces. The first one is to design a very precise machine tool. However, this interferes with technical and economic properties, as excessive demands put on working uncertainty of a machine tool can make it un-sellable. The second possibility is to design a machine with a certain fixed limit of working uncertainty that can be eliminated by means of mechatronic principles.2 Manufacturing and Working UncertaintyDimensional variations occurring at machining of workpieces give the first hand information about manufacturing scatter or manufacturing precision. Manufactur-ing uncertainty is a degree of precision which can be reached when machining a workpiece using a particular machine at a defined operation status. It includes de-viations conditioned by the machine as well as deviations which are not condi-tioned by the machine [VDI 3441]. According to the definition, all machining de-viations conditioned by the machine are summarized under the term "working uncertainty", including systematical as well as random errors (Fig. 1).372 J. Marek and P. BlechaFig. 1. Manufacturing uncertainty and working uncertainty Systematical errors are such influences as geometric deviations, thermal effects, static and dynamic rigidity, etc. They can be partly detected e. g. by geometric ex-aminations in accordance with DIN standards or ISO recommendations or by spe-cial independent examinations.Random deviations determine the range of a machine tool working scatter. They can be determined by mathematic-statistic methods from dimensional varia-tions of test workpieces (machined workpiece) under the specified machining conditions.3 Compensation of Manufacturing and Working Uncertainty Many authors examine the individual causes of manufacturing and working uncer-tainty separately [2, 3, 4, 5], especially the geometric accuracy of a machine tool in relation to the thermal machine condition [6, 7]. A great effort is put to explora-tion of geometric accuracy, primarily with the use of volumetry. The determined deviations are compensated either by means of hardware or software.The following is mostly adapted by means of hardware:•motion mechanisms of a machine including servo systems;•geometric deviations in shape and position of machine tool frame structural parts which are intentionally and purposely shape optimized during manufac-ture, in order to achieve the required effect after mounting them;Compensation of Axes at Vertical Lathes 373•geometric deviations in shape and position of guideways at motion axes so that the resulting motion reaches the required parameters;•heat radiation sources.It shall be mentioned that hardware compensation is very demanding and requires very good technical and physical knowledge.Software compensation lies in implementation of a compensation table into the digital control systems. The tables are prepared either in advance or at real time and pre-activated during a working cycle – machining. In the industrial practice the compensation tables are usually prepared in advance in the machine control system. It is mainly due to worse reliability and increased failure rate at obtaining the real-time feedback signals and also by the economy of the whole operation.Geometric accuracy is measured at unloaded machine (without cutting forces) and the axes are evaluated independently, unless assessed by volumetry. We want to stress the fact that comprehensive consideration of all factors causing the manu-facturing and working uncertainty of a machine tool is essential. Geometric accu-racy and thermal conditions (deformations) represent only one "little" part.Fig. 2. View of the TOSHULIN vertical lathe-type machining centre4 Vertical Lathe-Type Machining CentreA vertical lathe-type machining centre is presented in Fig. 2. From the kinematic point of view, one motion is performed by a workpiece (rotation) and two motions are performed by a tool (linear motion).374 J. Marek and P. Blecha The following compensations can be used as the control system options: •straightness compensation;•interpolation type of straightness compensation;•compensation of the vertical axis deflection;•increased bidirectional compensation of the screw lead;•compensation of the cross-rail deflection;•three-dimensional space compensation.These compensation principles can be applied in SIEMENS as well as FANUC control systems.Besides, the hardware compensations described above are applied at the machine. Fig. 3 shows the coordinate systems of the workpiece and of the tool at a vertical lathe-type machining centre. Workpiece compensation is necessary in case of high requirements on minimization of the manufacturing and working uncertainty: •stroke in the Z-axis (plane XY);•rotation of the plane XY around all axes;•stroke in the Y-axis (plane XZ);•stroke in the X-axis (plane YZ).It is also necessary to perform tool compensation:•stroke in the Z-axis;•stroke in the X-axis;•rotation of the plane XZ around all axes.Fig. 3. Tool and workpiece coordinate systems at a vertical lathe-type machining centre5 Practical ExampleIt was necessary to perform compensations in the individual axes for one important customer of TOSHULIN, a. s. company, in order to reach the required workingCompensation of Axes at Vertical Lathes 375 accuracy; the price of the machined workpieces reached hundreds of thousands EUR. Another interesting fact is that 90% of all material removed from the semi product was changed to chips. The workpiece wall thickness did not exceed 2 mm, its diameter was approximately the same as its height.Machining with such accuracy would not be possible without the following steps taken in cooperation with the machine user:•optimization of the workpiece shape and its chucking;•optimization of the technological process, the tool shape and of the tool edge cooling method;•training of the highly-qualified and dutiful machine operating staff; •optimization of the measuring process.It is evident from what was written above that achievement of high working accu-racy (minimization of manufacturing uncertainty and working uncertainty – see Fig. 1) is not only the matter of the machine tool itself, but also of its user.The machine design was optimized by hardware as well as software adjust-ments to decrease the working uncertainty. The machine manufacturer performed the following hardware modifications:•geometric shape and position deviations of frame structural parts and their guideways;•elimination of heat radiation sources.Software compensation consisted in this process: the actual course of the table displacement and rotation (Fig. 3) was approximated by a polynomial and the re-sulting compensation value was suitably used during the manufacturing process. The results obtained in practice are shown in Fig. 4.Fig. 4. Displacement compensation at the axes X, Y, Z It is clear from the presented graph that the errors, caused by systematical and random deviations during the machine operation, have been considerably de-creased in the X-axis, in the Y-axis as well as in the Z-axis (Fig. 1). This has376 J. Marek and P. Blecha resulted in a considerable decrease of working uncertainty and the required results have been obtained.6 ConclusionElimination of manufacturing uncertainty and working uncertainty (Fig. 1) is a very important part of a working process if any machine tool is operated. Mecha-tronic principles are used to decrease errors, combining hardware and software means. However, it is necessary to keep in mind that it is not very suitable to ex-plore the possibilities how to compensate the individual quantities separately, but it is necessary to consider the comprehensive effects of all factors affecting the manufacturing and working uncertainty.Acknowledgments. Research work for this contribution was financed by TOSHULIN, a.s. world leading producers of vertical lathes and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (project 1M0507 "Research of production techniques and technologies").References[1]Weck, M., Brecher, C.: Werkzeugmaschinen 3: mechatronische Systeme, Vorschuban-triebe, Prozessdiagnose, 6th edn., p. 442. Springer, Berlin (2006)[2]Shen, Y.L., Duffle, N.A.: Uncertainties in the acquisition and utilization of coordinateframes in manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 40(1), 527–530 (1991)[3]Knapp, W.: Measurement Uncertainty and Machine Tool Testing. CIRP Annals –Manufacturing Technology 51(1), 459–462 (2002)[4]Kurtoglu, A., Sohleniu, G.: The accuracy improvement of machine tools. CIRP Annals– Manufacturing Technology 39(1), 417–419 (1990)[5]Portman, V., Shuster, V., Rubenchik, Y., Shneor, Y.: Substitute Geometry of Multidi-mensional Features. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 53(1), 443–446 (2004) [6]Brecher, C., Hirsch, P., Weck, M.: Compensation of Thermo-elastic Machine Tool De-formation Based on Control internal Data. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technol-ogy 53(1), 299–302 (2004)[7]Svoboda, O.: Prostorová přesnost frézovacích center při tepelně neustálených stavech,PhD Thesis, ČVUT v Praze, FS, p. 132 (2007)。