雅思写作大作文思路 警察是否应该持枪 why police should or should not carry guns.doc

2015年4月25日雅思写作预测2015年4月25日雅思写作预测下载入口：/20150320/yc-mm-0425xz.html?seo=wenku4.073雅思写作如何才能得高分呢？小马过河给大家发布了2015年4月25日雅思写作预测，帮助考生进行雅思写作备考，考生可以进入链接免费索取下载使用。

2015年4月25日雅思写作预测部分内容：2015年4月25日雅思写作预测范文一：警察需要配枪吗This should be a familiar scene in a Hollywood detective movie: an American police officer, armed with a pistol in case of a sudden strke from a misty corner, patrols a dark alley in search of the criminal element.In the meantime, his UK counterparts has to do the same job with merely a short baton in ha12 He is like a fearless knight fighting for honour against enemies armed with guns with only his lance. Naturally, the ending will always be unfavourable to him. Or the ending will always not be to the delight of the spectators.Police, as protectors of his people , should do what they can, and use whatever means they can, to keep people out of harm's way. But in the UK, police are on duty without carying a gun, which is a very bad idea. They are handicapping themselves.Generally speaking, gun is recognized as a emblem of power and justice of police. It is clear that a police with gun on is able to prevent those potential criminal activities. For instance, a pistol on the belt works effectively to stop crimes range from those robbery, theft, and rape and it can also force the criminals to be arrested.Furthermore, gun serves for a reliable friend while the police crashs into a emergent situation like gun fighting or commotion. Guns are not expected to be employed to finish off the chaos but to help the police survive before the reinforcement comes.Meanwhile, the violence rate is rising in UK due to the global terrorism. Unlike the ordinary gangster and robbers who is armed daggers and knives, a large number of international terrorists are equipped with semi-auto rifles and massive destruction weapons. Proper measures must be taken to limit the uneven contrast of power and the great efforts should be made to protect civilianfrom the harm of terrorist attack. However, there is an old saying “combat poison with poison”, say, an overall upgrading of UK police equipments couldn‘t be better to meet the needs. It is all necessary that every policecarries a pistol while they are on duty, that would be thepracticable way to ensure the public security in Briton.小马机经app和小马托福听力app是小马特为托福备考考生而研发的一款手机备考软件。

雅思写作大作文思路持有枪支是否应该合法 why gun ownership should be legal or illegal今天我们雅思写作大作文思路的文章来研究下持有枪支是否应该合法的问题。

新中国成立之后，政府对民间存在的枪支进行了几次大型的收缴活动，并制定法律，严惩私藏枪支的行为，即所谓的刀枪入库，马放南山。

这一措施对稳定社会秩序，提升社会治安起到了积极的作用。

作为平民，我们不用太过担心恶性犯罪的发生。

而美国的一些州则采取了相反的措施，允许民间持枪。

他们认为这是民众的合法权利。

民众要拥有保护自己的能力。

但这也滋生了一些犯罪问题，最典型的就是校园枪击案的层出不穷。

那么持有枪支是否应该合法呢？小编搜集了一些素材和思路，以供大家参考。

枪支为什么应该合法 why guns should be legalIn some countries, people are allowed to own firearms在一些国家，人们被允许拥有自己的枪械。

Individuals have the right to protect themselves个人拥有保护他们自己的权利。

People can use guns in self defence人们可以使用枪支自卫。

This deters criminals这可以威慑犯罪分子。

枪支为什么应该不合法 why gun owership should be illegalThere is a risk of accidents with guns枪支存在发生事故的风险。

The number of violent crimes increases when guns are available当枪支触手可及的时候，暴力犯罪的数量有所上升。

Criminals may be armed犯罪分子可能武装起来。

The police then need to use guns警察也相应的需要使用枪支。

2020年4月30日雅思写作犯罪类题目预测犯罪类1、Some people believe that if a police force carries a gun, it will encourage higher levels of violence in the whole society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?2、In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should children or teenagers be punished?3、Some think most crime is the result of circumstances e.g. poverty and other social problems. Others believe that most crime is committed by people who are bad by nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.4、Some people think that all the lawbreakers should be taken into the prison, while others believe that there are better alternatives, (for example, doing some work or learning some skills in the community). Discuss both views and give your opinion.5、Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?6、Today prison is the most common solution for crime. But some people think that it would be a more effective way to provide them with better education to prevent them from becoming criminals. Do you agree or disagree?7、Many people are afraid to leave home because of crimes. Some believe that more action should be taken to prevent crimes, but others feel little can be done. Discuss both views and give your opinion.8、Nowadays some individuals behave in an anti-society way, such as committing a crime. In general, it is the society to blame. What causes the anti-social behaviors of individuals? Who should be responsible for dealing with it?。

应该控枪的英文作文英文回答：Gun control is a highly controversial issue in the United States. There are two main sides to the debate: those who believe that guns should be more strictly regulated, and those who believe that gun ownership is a fundamental right that should not be infringed upon.Those who support gun control argue that it is necessary to reduce gun violence. They point to the high number of gun-related deaths in the United States, and argue that stricter gun laws would help to prevent these deaths. They also argue that gun control is necessary to prevent mass shootings, such as the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012.Those who oppose gun control argue that it is unnecessary and that it would not be effective in reducing gun violence. They argue that the vast majority of gunowners are law-abiding citizens, and that stricter gun laws would only punish them. They also argue that gun control would not prevent criminals from obtaining guns, and thatit would only make it more difficult for law-abidingcitizens to defend themselves.The debate over gun control is likely to continue for many years to come. There is no easy answer to the question of whether or not gun control is necessary. However, it is important to have a informed opinion on the issue, and tobe able to articulate your views on the matter.中文回答：枪支管制是美国的一个高度争议性问题。

Police in Britain do not carry guns. Some people believe that unarmed police are unable to protect citizens, but some suggest that arming the police will lead to a surge in violence in society. Discuss those two views.Whether to arm the police is a contentious subject. While some people maintain that unarmed police are unable to protect law-abiding citizens, others reject this notion, believing that it leads to a drop in violence in society. There are several factors that account for the stark/sharp contrast between the two thoughts.The primary concern on armed police is that it would increase the potential for miscarriage of justice and mistaken shootings of innocent civilians. The legislation in many countries is supportive of this concern. Laws protect citizens from torture or cruel treatment and also their rights on arrest or detainment. If armed, the police will be less likely to think twice before pulling the trigger. They can easily get away with private execution by inventing a legitimate excuse, such as self-defense. The chance of a shoot-out would naturally rise, causing many preventable injuries or losses of life.Arming the police might also add fuel to the gun culture. Nowadays, perhaps nothing is worse than the continued rise in the gun ownership rate. Arming the police can never redress the imbalance but worse, give criminals a motivator to carry guns even for minor crimes. On the other hand, in those communities that are otherwise peaceful, armed police are intimidating and the fear of crime will spread wildly. It would lead to further demand on private gun ownership, and expose members of the public to higher risk.Arming police is therefore not advisable in most cases but only allowed in exceptional circumstances. For example, in those areas where armed crimes are rampant, armed police protect not only the public but also themselves from the potential attack. It gives the police the leverage in their combat against criminals, especially those hardened criminals. Firearms also serve as a deterrent to would-be offenders. If street patrols in some neighbours are routinely armed, it helps cut the rates of crime.The access to weapons should therefore be limited, for the simple reason that carrying guns leads to higher likelihood of mistaken shootings and to higher levels of violence. Carrying guns is only accepted when the police are in conflict situations and confrontations with criminals.。

警察应不应该带枪英语作文Police officers should carry guns. Carrying a gun is a necessary part of a police officer's job. Police officers need to be able to protect themselves and the public from dangerous criminals. Guns are an important tool that allows police officers to do their job effectively and keep people safe.One of the main reasons police officers should carry guns is for self-defense. Police officers often find themselves in dangerous situations where they may need to use force to protect themselves. Criminals may be armed and willing to use violence against the police. Having a gun allows police officers to defend themselves and respond appropriately to threats. Without a gun, police officers would be at a significant disadvantage and would be unable to effectively protect themselves.In addition to self-defense, carrying a gun also allows police officers to protect the public. Police officers are responsible for maintaining law and order and keeping communities safe. If a police officer encounters a dangerous criminal, a gun allows them to stop that criminal and prevent them from harming innocent people. Guns give police officers the ability to quickly and effectively respond to threatsand emergencies, which can save lives.Furthermore, the mere presence of a gun can be a deterrent to crime. Criminals may be less likely to commit crimes if they know that police officers are armed and able to respond with force. This can help reduce the overall level of crime in a community and make people feel safer.Critics of police officers carrying guns argue that it can lead to more violence and that police officers are more likely to use excessive force. However, this is not supported by the evidence. Studies have shown that the majority of police shootings are justified and that police officers generally use force appropriately and only when necessary. Furthermore, proper training and strict policies on the use of force can help ensure that police officers use their guns responsibly and only when absolutely necessary.In conclusion, police officers should carry guns as part of their job. Guns are a necessary tool that allows police officers to protect themselves and the public from dangerous criminals. While there are valid concerns about the potential for misuse, the benefits of having armed police officers outweigh the risks. Proper training and policies can help ensure that police officers use their guns responsibly and effectively.。

枪支管制英文作文英文：Gun control is a hot topic in many countries, including the United States. As a responsible gun owner, I believe that there should be some level of control and regulation on firearms to ensure public safety.First and foremost, I want to make it clear that I am not advocating for a complete ban on all firearms. I believe in the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, but I also believe that there should be reasonable restrictions in place. For example, background checks should be mandatory for all gun purchases to prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands. In addition, I support waiting periods for gun purchases to allow for thorough background checks to be completed.Another aspect of gun control that I support is the restriction of certain types of firearms, such as assaultrifles. These weapons are designed for military use and have no place in civilian hands. By limiting access to these types of firearms, we can reduce the potential for mass shootings and other forms of gun violence.Furthermore, I believe that there should be stricter regulations on the storage and safekeeping of firearms. Many accidents involving guns occur because of improper storage or negligence. By enforcing laws that require gun owners to securely store their firearms, we can prevent tragic accidents from happening.In conclusion, I believe that gun control is necessary to ensure the safety of our communities. By implementing common-sense regulations, we can reduce the risk of gun violence while still respecting the rights of responsible gun owners.中文：枪支管制是许多国家的热门话题，包括美国。

试论警察警械使用的必要合理性以及法律支持还是那句话，在中国，每天都有警察流血牺牲，作为一名警察，身上担负的很多，既要服务大众，又要打击犯罪，然而，在一线执勤执法中，因为警械的使用问题，以及法律层面上所应该具有的权力和义务上更加详细的规定或者支持，是一个不容回避的问题，越来越多的事件或者案件，彰显了研究和探讨这一问题的必要性和紧迫性。

现有的法律法规对警察在出警现场的权益保护不足，以及警务训练模式的不足，这是一个深层次的问题。

首先，对于武器和警械的使用条例，中国的法律是有明文规定的，一般来讲，就是在必要的时候，用警械将嫌疑人“制服”或者是“控制”，而对于一些严重的暴力犯罪行为，以及危害人民警察生命安全的违法犯罪，才可以警告后使用武器。

那么，这里的“制服”和“控制”是一个笼统的概念，是比较缺乏可操作性的。

可能有人会说，警察用警械都不能把嫌疑人制服，还叫什么警察？这里我要讲一下，现在警方的警务技能训练，显然比照现在复杂的治安环境相比，明显是比较滞后的，而且缺乏法律层面上的强力支持。

我先从单警装备开始说起。

要制服的前提是使嫌疑人失去反抗能力，从而顺利的被带离，我们探讨一下警械是否能起到让嫌疑人失反抗能力的作用。

先说匕首，这个东西是仅次于枪支的杀伤性警械，在实际中，根本无法使用，或者是根本没人使用，你说，警察在制止犯罪嫌疑人的时候，敢用匕首往哪个部位扎？扎伤扎残之后怎么办？不还得警察个人出钱治疗？轻的几个月工资，重的就得几年工资，恐怕因为匕首扎成重伤，再来个故意伤害罪，也不是不可能吧，所以，单警装备中的匕首，就是一个摆设，根本没人敢于使用。

然后再说一说警棍，警棍最大的好处就是使用方便，但是，基本上这东西根本无法起到制服的作用，你说就那么一根棍子，该打到嫌疑人的那个部位才能把嫌疑人制服，失去反抗能力？恐怕只有脑袋了，而现实中，敢拿这个东西往嫌疑人脑袋上招呼的也没几个，因为制服是制服了，可是后续的事情都变成警察个人的了，要警察个人担责的。

枪支管制英文作文英文：Gun control has been a hotly debated topic for years, with strong opinions on both sides of the issue. Personally, I believe that there should be stricter gun control measures in place to help prevent gun violence.One reason for this is the alarming number of mass shootings that have occurred in recent years. Thesetragedies have devastated communities and claimed countless lives. While it is true that not all of these shootings could have been prevented with stricter gun laws, it isclear that something needs to be done to address this issue.Another reason for my support of gun control is thefact that it can help reduce gun-related accidents and suicides. By implementing measures such as backgroundchecks and waiting periods, we can ensure that only responsible and mentally stable individuals have access tofirearms.Of course, there are those who argue that stricter gun control measures infringe on their Second Amendment rights. However, I believe that the safety of our communities should take priority over individual rights in this case.In conclusion, while I understand that there are valid arguments on both sides of the gun control debate, I personally believe that stricter measures are necessary to help prevent gun violence and promote public safety.中文：枪支管制一直是一个备受争议的话题，双方都有强烈的观点。

雅思写作警察持枪的优缺点讨论编者按：有的同学向我反馈在学完批改实录所有的文章后雅思作文成绩提高了2分成功拿到了offer我感到无比的自豪，还有的同学成功通过了essay，report或者presentation的考核，我都觉得无比欣慰，学长只是过来人，能够帮助到大家也是我的快乐。

Topic: Discuss the issue about whether police should be armed写得不错没什么可以指正的，如果说想写得更地道一点的话我的范文：修改后：Nowadays, prevention of increasing criminal rates could be a thorny problem. There has been a controversial issue regarding whether police need be armed, one accepted statement is that it leads to the rise of the level of violence. Personally, I disagree with this view.1. 首先我需要表扬你写得不错，有两个点1)犯罪成本的上升，罪犯可能因为怕死而不敢犯罪。

2)持枪可能使罪犯误伤街上的老人。

以上两点是你的观点，而且topic sentence写得还可以，只是你没有像我一样将“担心死亡”上升到“犯罪成本的提高”，你只是简单地翻译出来而且用了lose life这样不地道的口语表达，而且第二点用for example 连接不妥，明明在说第二件事情，“比如”什么呢?逻辑不要乱。

用in addition 或者secondly更显得用层次感。

2. 开头的it指代不明。

修改后：Police being armed might be an effective method that deters criminals and hence decrease the criminal rates. First, this increases the possibilities that some offenders give up the criminal minds if crime costs have risen significantly, whichimplies that potential offenders might consider the possible consequence to be death. In addition, elderly people could be injured accidentally by in the street. Nevertheless, this type of crimes is gradually disappearing because of the deterrent of police carrying guns.1. 两段写得都是持枪不好的观点，分别是：1) 刺激罪犯买枪与警察对峙。