模拟分析调制技术对基于光纤无线电传输COFDM的影响(IJMECS-V4-N8-1)
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:599.67 KB
- 文档页数:8
cofdm解决方案
《COFDM解决方案:无线传输技术的新趋势》
在当今的无线通信领域,COFDM (正交频分复用) 技术被广泛应用于多种传输场景中。
它通过将数据流分成多个子频道并进行正交调制,以提高信号的稳定性和抗干扰能力。
COFDM 解决方案已经成为无线传输技术的新趋势,为各种行业提供了高效、可靠的通信解决方案。
在广播电视领域,COFDM 解决方案已被广泛应用于数字电视传输中。
通过使用COFDM 技术,数字电视可以实现高质量的图像和声音传输,具有更好的抗干扰能力,使得电视节目可以更加稳定地传输到家庭用户的电视机上。
在军事通信领域,COFDM 解决方案也发挥着重要作用。
在复杂的作战环境中,无线通信往往受到各种干扰和干扰的影响,而COFDM 技术可以有效地抵御这些干扰,确保军事指挥和作战信息的及时传输和安全。
此外,COFDM 解决方案还被应用于应急救援通信、航空航天通信以及工业自动化等领域。
通过使用COFDM 技术,这些行业可以建立起快速、可靠的无线通信系统,提高工作效率和安全性。
总的来说,COFDM 解决方案已经成为无线传输技术的一个重要发展方向,它通过其出色的信号稳定性和抗干扰能力,为各行业提供了高效、可靠的通信解决方案。
随着科技的不断进步
和应用场景的不断拓展,COFDM 技术将会在更多的领域发挥重要作用,并为无线通信领域带来更多的创新和进步。
Cofdm 方案引言Cofdm(Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing,编码正交频分复用)是一种在无线通信中广泛应用的技术。
它通过将数据分成多个子载波,将数据编码和调制后,在频域上进行传输,以提高频谱利用率和抗多径干扰能力。
本文将介绍Cofdm的基本原理、优点和应用场景。
基本原理Cofdm系统在发送端将数据分成多个子载波,在频域上进行调制和编码。
每个子载波的频谱宽度很窄,可以减小单个子载波受到多径干扰的可能性。
同时,Cofdm系统在发送端采用循环前缀技术,以消除码间干扰,提高传输的可靠性。
在接收端,Cofdm系统使用FFT(Fast Fourier Transform,快速傅里叶变换)将接收到的信号从时域转换为频域。
然后,通过对每个子载波进行解调和解码,将得到的各个子载波数据重新合并,恢复原始的数据。
优点Cofdm方案具有以下优点:1.高频谱利用率: Cofdm技术将数据分成多个子载波进行传输,提高了频谱的利用率。
相比传统的单载波调制技术,Cofdm系统可以同时在同一频带内传输更多的数据,提高传输效率。
2.抗多径干扰能力强: Cofdm技术通过将数据分成多个子载波,在频域上进行传输。
这种分频传输的方式使得Cofdm系统能够有效地应对多径传播引起的干扰。
即使存在多次反射和衰落,Cofdm系统也能够对接收到的信号进行处理,提供较好的传输质量。
3.灵活性高: Cofdm系统的子载波可以进行自由配置,不同子载波可以采用不同的调制方式和编码方式。
这样,Cofdm系统可以根据不同的传输需求,对不同子载波进行灵活调整,提供更好的服务质量。
应用场景Cofdm方案在无线通信中有广泛的应用场景。
1.数字电视广播: 在数字电视广播中,Cofdm技术被广泛使用。
通过使用Cofdm系统进行数字电视信号的传输,可以提供更高的频谱利用率和抗干扰能力,提供更高质量的数字电视服务。
光纤通信系统中偏振模色散效应的补偿设计一、引言随着社会的信息化,用户对通信容量的需求日益增加,未来全业务服务中每一用户的容量需求可能超过100 Mb/s。
在这种需求的推动下,作为现代长途干线通信主体的光纤通信一直在朝着高速率、大容量和长距离的方向发展。
在单信道速率不断提升(现已发展到10 Gb/s,正向40 Gb/s甚至160Gb/s发展)的同时,密集波分复用技术(DWDM)也已日趋成熟并商用化。
从技术的角度来看,限制高速率信号长距离传输的因素主要包括光纤衰减、非线性和色散。
掺铒光纤放大器(EDFA)的研制成功,使光纤衰减对系统的传输距离不再起主要限制作用。
而非线性效应和色散对系统传输的影响随着非零色散位移光纤(NZDSF)的引入也逐渐减小和消除。
随着单信道传输速率的提高和模拟信号传输带宽的增加,原来在光纤通信系统中不太被关注的偏振模色散(PMD)问题近来变得十分突出。
与光纤非线性和色散一样,PMD能损害系统的传输性能,限制系统的传输速率和距离,并被认为是限制高速光纤通信系统传输容量和距离的最终因素。
正是由于PMD对高速大容量光纤通信系统有着不可忽视的影响,所以自20世纪90年代以来,已引起业界的广泛关注,并正成为目前国际上光纤通信领域研究的热点。
二、光纤中偏振模色散的定义单模光纤中,基模是由两个相互垂直的偏振模组成的。
两偏振模的群速度由于受到外界一些不稳定因素的影响而产生差异,在传播中两偏振模的迭加使得信号脉冲展宽,从而形成偏振模色散。
PMD是由以下几个方面的因素造成的:光纤所固有的双折射,即光纤在生产过程中产生的几何尺寸不规则和在光纤中残留应力导致折射率分布的各向异性;光缆在铺设使用过程中,由于受到外界的挤压、弯曲、扭转和环境温度变化的影响而产生偏振模耦合效应,从而改变两偏振模各自的传播常数和幅度,导致PMD;另外当光信号通过一些光通信器件如隔离器、耦合器、滤波器时,由于器件结构和材料本身的不完整性,也能导致双折射,产生PMD。
COFDM(coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing),即编码正交频分复用的简称,是目前世界最先进和最具发展潜力的调制技术。
其基本原理就是将高速数据流通过串并转换,分配到传输速率较低的若干子信道中进行传输。
编码(C)是指信道编码采用编码率可变的卷积编码方式,以适应不同重要性数据的保护要求;正交频分(OFD)指使用大量的载波(副载波),它们有相等的频率间隔,都是一个基本震荡频率的整数倍;复用(M)指多路数据源相互交织地分布在上述大量载波上,形成一个频道。
上个世纪中期,人们提出了频带混叠的多载波通信方案,选择相互之间正交的载波频率作子载波,也就是我们所说的COFDM。
这种“正交”表示的是载波频率间精确的数学关系。
按照这种设想,COFDM既能充分利用信道带宽,也可以避免使用高速均衡和抗突发噪声差错。
COFDM是一种特殊的多载波通信方案,单个用户的信息流被串/并变换为多个低速率码流,每个码流都用一个子载波发送。
COFDM不用带通滤波器来分隔子载波,而是通过快速傅立叶变换(FFT)来选用那些即便混叠也能够保持正交的波形。
COFDM技术属于多载波调制(Multi-Carrier Modulation,MCM)技术。
有些文献上将OFDM 和MCM混用,实际上不够严密。
MCM与COFDM常用于无线信道,它们的区别在于:COFDM技术特指将信道划分成正交的子信道,频道利用率高;而MCM,可以是更多种信道划分方法。
COFDM技术的推出其实是为了提高载波的频谱利用率,或者是为了改进对多载波的调制,它的特点是各子载波相互正交,使扩频调制后的频谱可以相互重叠,从而减小了子载波间的相互干扰。
COFDM每个载波所使用的调制方法可以不同。
各个载波能够根据信道状况的不同选择不同的调制方式,比如BPSK、QPSK、8PSK、16QAM、64QAM等等,以频谱利用率和误码率之间的最佳平衡为原则。
COFDM 方案简介COFDM(Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing,编码正交频分复用)是一种用于数字无线通信系统的调制技术。
它通过将数据拆分为多个子载波,并采用正交编码以提高抗干扰性能和频谱效率。
COFDM 方案已被广泛应用于无线广播、无线电视、无线通信等领域。
COFDM 技术原理COFDM 技术的核心原理是将输入的数字信号转换为多个低速数据流,并将这些数据流进行正交编码和调制。
具体来说,COFDM 技术包含以下步骤:1.数据分割:将输入的数字信号分割为多个独立的子信号,用于不同的子载波。
2.正交编码:对每个子信号应用独立的编码方式,以增加信道容量并提高抗干扰性能。
3.帧间差错编码:为增强信号的纠错能力,采用一种差错编码方式,能够检测和纠正接收端的错误。
4.并行调制:将每个子信号调制到独立的子载波上,以避免不同子信号之间的干扰。
5.子载波分配:将各个子信号映射到不同的子载波频率上,并确保这些子载波之间在频域上互相正交。
6.插入保护间隔:在每个子载波之间插入保护间隔,以降低多径衰落引起的干扰。
7.发射端传输:将经过正交编码和调制后的信号发送到发射天线,并通过空中传输。
8.接收端处理:接收天线接收到信号后,进行解调和解码。
对接收到的子载波进行去闪烁、同步、解码和解调,还原原始的数字信号。
COFDM 方案的优势COFDM 方案相对于其他调制技术具有多个优势:1.抗多径干扰:COFDM 方案采用分散的信号频谱进行传输,能够有效抵抗多径衰落引起的干扰。
它通过破坏多径信号的时间相关性,使其具有良好的抗干扰能力。
2.高频谱效率:COFDM 方案将输入信号分割为多个独立的子信号,并将它们分配到不同的子载波上。
这种频域分离使得每个子载波具有较小的带宽,从而提高了频谱效率。
3.高可靠性:通过在信号中引入差错保护编码,COFDM 方案能够有效地纠正接收端的错误,并提高信号的可靠性。
COFDM 技术及应用模式作者:王行建来源:《中国新通信》 2017年第16期一、引言随着信息技术和智能无人技术的飞速发展,人们对无人机空地高清图传的需求越来越迫切。
无线图像传输与普通信号传输不同,具有鲜明的特点:1)数据量大,文本或者语音是Kbps 级别,而图像达到几Mbps 级别;2)实时画面要求时延低;3)加装到无人机设备上,功率受限,要求发射功率低;4)传输距离远;5)无人机经常要在人群密集或者有电磁干扰等环境复杂的情况下进行工作,要求抗干扰能力强;6)无人机信道复杂,是多径信道且具有多普勒频偏。
目前无人机图传主流的技术有3G/4G 技术、WiFi 等。
3G/4G价格高昂、传输速度相对较慢、使用过程中会产生流量费,并且该技术不能在离开公众移动通信网的地方使用。
WIFI传输协议在技术上有很多限定,且不可修改,无法支持多对一,并且传输时延较大,频谱效率低,没有专门针对抗干扰的协议处理机制,抗干扰性能差。
鉴于无人机空地信道是一种具有较大多普勒频移的时变多径衰落信道,而编码正交频分复用能很好的满足复杂场景下的这一要求,成为一种可行的解决方案。
本文阐述了COFDM 技术的基本原理,说明了COFDM技术优点和缺点,介绍了COFDM 技术在无线宽带传输中的应用现状,并列举了几种典型的应用模式。
二、COFDM 技术应用COFDM 技术在高速无线通信领域得到了广泛的使用。
比如数字广播电视系统和高清图传系统。
2.1 地面数字电视广播地面数字电视广播(Digital Video Broadcasting-Terrestrial, DVB-T),是欧洲通用的地面数字电视标准。
DVB-T 标准用于地面广播频道。
地面广播信道由于复杂的地形,存在时变衰落和多径干扰,信噪比低。
DVB-T采用内码交织和卷积编码以及外码交织和RS 编码的前向纠错技术,同时使用COFDM 和格雷码映射4/16/64QAM 调制用于通道处理。
I.J.Modern Education and Computer Science, 2012, 8, 1-8Published Online August 2012 in MECS (/)DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.08.01Simulative Analysis of Influence of Modulation Techniques on COFDM based Radio over FiberTransmissionShikha MahajanDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaEmail: shikhashikha2486@Naresh KumarDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaEmail: naresh_uiet@pu.ac.inAbstract —In this paper, Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (COFDM) based Radio over Fiber (RoF) system is simulated (for different bit rates) for different modulation techniques to observe impact on system parameter [quality factor (Q)]. Influence of increasing bit rates has been observed for 2 km long linear multimode fiber. To reduce dispersion due to multimode fiber, convolutional encoder (code rate ½, generator polynomial 1338, 1718) and viterbi hard decision decoding algorithm are chosen for simulative model of COFDM based RoF system. Transmission of 32 sub-carriers with externally modulated continuous wave laser source gave satisfied results for Q values. Index Terms — RoF, COFDM, MMF, Q-factorI.I NTRODUCTIONRoF technology is a strong potential candidate for distribution of RF and cellular signals for broadband wireless applications and it takes advantages of intrinsic low attenuation and wide bandwidth for transporting RF signals [1]. The applications of RoF technology include cellular networks, satellite communication, Multipoint Video Distribution Services, Mobile Broadband System and Wireless LANs over optical networks [2]. RF signal/power is carried by a strong optical carrier from central station using optical fiber cables in RoF systems. RF signal is radiated by using very high gain antenna unit to remote sites [3]. It is used to transmit an analog intensity modulation (IM) of laser diode and to receive direct detection (DD) performed by a photodiode. It is called IM-DD based RoF system, a very simple and low cost RoF communication system. RoF technology involves the use of optical components and techniques to allocate RF signals from the control stations (CS) to the base stations. Thus, RoF makes it possible to centralize the RF signal processing functions in one shared location (CS) [4]. Particularly, radio over multi mode fiber system (RoMMF) has gained much attention recently for its suitability to deliver high-purity signals in analog and digital format for short-reach coverage such as wireless local area networks and ultrawideband radio signals [5]. It is illustrated that although there were recent studies on RoF performance in single mode fibers [6], multi mode fibers can also be allocated for RoF systems with reasonable fiber distances [7]. Multi Mode Fibers (MMFs) were the first optical fibers to be developed in the early days of optical communications, before the advent of Single-Mode Fibers [8].COFDM has been specified for digital broadcasting systems, Digital Audio Broadcasting, Digital Video Broadcasting [9]. COFDM is particularly well matched to these applications, since it is very tolerant of the effects of multipath (provided a suitable guard interval is used). For short-distance applications, COFDM can be used efficiently for high data rate signal delivery and to tolerate the effect of modal dispersion. Modal dispersion is the dominant performance limiting factor in MMFs. Hence this leads to the need of incorporating COFDM techniques into radio over multi mode fiber systems [9, 10]. In RoF, COFDM impact has been demonstrated with MMF as a promising modulation scheme for mitigating the modal dispersion penalty [11]. Convolutional coding is being used commonly in COFDM systems, and it can give coding gain at different coding rates [12]. By implementing coding and interleaving across sub-carriers, the effect of multipath fading is minimised since interleaving reorganises the number of bits in a way so as to avoid the effects of fading.In present paper, unidirectional transmission of COFDM based RoF system has been successfully realized by simulations over 2 km optical distance with convolutional encoder and viterbi hard decision decoder to reduce error floors and increase reliability. The influence of increasing bit rates on performance of Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) and Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) modulation techniques with optical amplifier on received Q values is studied.2 Simulative Analysis of Influence of Modulation Techniques on COFDM based Radio over Fiber TransmissionA. Simulation Setup for Unidirectional RoF System RoF system is very cost effective because of localization of signal processing in central station and use of a simple base station. It realizes transparent transformation between RF signal and optical signal. Pseudo-random bit sequence generator (PRBSG) data format is used and convolutionally encoded at rate ½ and generator polynomials 1338 and 1718. For downlink simulation, a narrow bandwidth continuous wave (CW) (wavelength 1300 nm) from laser diode is modulated via a Mach-Zehnder Modulator (MZM). An ideal pre amplifier before optoelectronic conversion by PIN-photodetector having centre frequency of 1300 nm and post amplifier is used at uplink simulation. Optical link i.e. a linear multi mode fiber of length 2 km is used. In receiver section, optical signal is detected by a PIN-photodiode. Q-factor values of signals are measured by BER analyzer at base station. Fig 1 shows the implementation approach for transmitting convolutionally encoded data over a multi mode fiber and receiving the decoded data.Fig1. Block diagram of COFDM based RoF system .B. Overview of COFDM SystemThe basic principle of COFDM is to split a high rate data stream into a number of lower rate streamsto be transmitted simultaneously over a number of sub-carriers each of a different frequency and these carriers are orthogonal to each other [13]. The COFDM system consists of threemain elements. These are Channel coding/interleaving, IFFT/FFT and Guard interval/cyclic prefix.Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) divides the channel bandwidth into sub channels and transmits multiple low rate signals by carrying each signal on a separate carrier frequency. To ensure that the signal of one sub channel does not overlap with the signal from an adjacent one, some guard band is necessary which is an obvious loss of spectrum and hence bandwidth. But since carriers are orthogonal to each other in COFDM therefore it offers bandwidth efficiency as no guard band is required as shown in Fig 2.Fig2. Bandwidth conservation (a) FDM(b) OFDM.Orthogonality between sub-carriers is maintained if sinusoids have integer number of cycles in T s (symbol duration) given by (1) below:(1)Where f c is the sub-carrier frequency. The incoming data is first converted from serial to parallel and grouped into x bits each to be modulated by Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM), Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK), or Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK). The required spectrum is then converted back to its time domain signal using an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT), commonly used in most applications. The IFFT performs the transformation very efficiently and provides a simple way of ensuring the carrier signals produced are orthogonal. The signals are then converted back to serial for transmission. The discrete signals are converted back to analog. The receiver performs the inverse process of the transmitter.A guard interval is inserted between every COFDM symbol to avoid Inter symbol Interference (ISI) caused by multipath distortion. This means that in the guard time, the COFDM symbol is cyclically extended to avoid Inter Carrier Interference (ICI) [14]. The guard interval is formed by a cyclic continuation of the signal so the information in the guard interval is actually present in the COFDM symbol [15]. It is actually added by taking the copy of the last portion of the COFDM symbol and placing it at the start of the symbol as illustrated in Fig 3.Fig3. Guard time and Cyclic prefix.The last T g portion of the symbol is appended and transmitted during the guard time. T u is the COFDM symbol time without guard interval. T cp is the duration of the copied information in the guard interval using cyclic prefix. Therefore total COFDM symbol time T s = T u+T cp. Cyclic prefix helps in maintaining orthogonality between sub-carriers by converting linear convolution into circular convolution in multipath environment and also avoids ICI.The Fast Fourier Transform is a very efficient mathematical method for calculating Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) [15]. The direct evaluation of an N-point DFT is done using the following formula (2):(2) Where k = 0, 1, 2…….N-1. DFT requires N2 complex multiplications and N*(N-1) complex additions whereas use of FFT algorithm reduces the number of computations to the order of N/2*log2 (N) complex multiplications and N*log2 (N) additions. Moreover FFT algorithm works efficiently when N is a power of 2, therefore the number of sub-carriers is usually kept as power of 2. IFFT/FFT operation ensures that sub-carriers do not interfere with each other. IFFT is used at the transmitter to obtain the time domain samples of the multicarrier signal. FFT is used to retrieve the data sent on individual sub-carriers. Therefore COFDM has a very simple implementation capability.COFDM system employs conventional forward error correction codes and interleaving for protection against burst errors caused by deep fades in the channel. Often it is concatenated with a block code for improving the performance. A Viterbi decoder for decoding a convolutional code is easy to implement. Codes of different coding rates are used in conjunction with different modulation schemes to support different quality of services. While error correction codes provide coding gain in the system, interleaving provides diversity gain. For OFDM, when a deep fade occurs in the channel, the bits within the deep fade are erased. Interleaving the bits across different frequency bins distributes the energy within a symbol among different sub-carriers. Since distinct sub-carriers undergo different fading conditions, the probability that all the bits corresponding to a symbol are lost, decreases significantly. An uncoded OFDM system cannot exploit frequency diversity, since in frequency selective fading channels, the sub-carriers separated by coherence bandwidth are independent of each other. The frequency diversity can be realized by spreading coded bits over different sub-carriers in such a way that adjacent bits are separated by coherence bandwidth. An interleaver permutes symbols according to a mapping. A corresponding deinterleaver uses the inverse mapping to restore the original sequence of symbols. Interleaving and deinterleaving can be useful for reducing errors caused by burst errors in a communication system. A convolutional interleaver consists of a set of shift registers, each with a fixed delay. Fig 4 shows a convolutional encoder with constraint length L =7.Fig4. Convolutional encoder.C.Viterbi Algorithm for Decoding ConvolutionalCodesViterbi algorithm is a well-known maximum-likelihood algorithm for decoding of convolutional codes. A hard decision decoder receives only bits from the channel (without any reliability estimate). A Viterbi algorithm consists of the following parts:1.Branch metric calculation –calculation of a distance between the input pair of bits and the four possible “ideal” pairs (“00”, “01”, “10”, “11”). F or a hard decision decoder it is a Hamming distance, i.e. a number of differing bits.2.Path metric calculation –for every encoder state, calculate a metric for the survivor path ending in this state (a survivor path is a path with the minimum metric).Fig5. Parts of viterbi algorithmD.COFDM ModelConvolutional Encoder: According to the COFDM standard, information data must be encoded with a convolutional encoder with coding rate R = 1/2, 2/3, or 3/4, corresponding to the desired data rate. The convolutional encoder uses the industry-standard generator polynomials, [1338, 1718] of rate R =1/2 [16]. FFT and IFFT: This sub-block is the heart of COFDM technology. These operations performing linear mappings between N complex data symbols and N complex COFDM symbols result in robustness against fading multipath channel. The reason is to transform the high data rate stream into N low data rate streams, each experiencing a flat fading during the transmission. Length of FFT/IFFT is taken to be 64. Guard Time Insertion: This sub-block is responsible for making COFDM symbols resistant to inter symbol interference. It takes copy of last samples equal to guard interval from each COFDM symbol and place it at the beginning of the COFDM symbol. The guard period used is symbol extension in COFDM model.Viterbi Decoding: For decoding the convolutional codes the Viterbi decoding algorithm [17] is used, which offers best performance according to the maximum likelihood criteria. The input to the Viterbi decoder is hard-decided bits that are 0 or 1, which is referred to as a hard decision.The implementation process of COFDM is as follows:1)The data bits are convolutionally encodedwith a code rate ½.2)The encoded bits are bit-interleaved andthen mapped into in-phase and quadraturecomponents of the complex symbol.3)The complex symbols are modulated byOFDM modulator. Table 1 summarisesCOFDM parameters.Table 1.COFDM parametersParameter ValueCode rate ½Generator polynomials 1338, 1718Constraint length 7The implementation process of Viterbi algorithm to convolutionally decode binary data is as follows:1)Decoded=Vitdec(Code,Trellis,Tblen,Opmode,Dectype)2)The vector Code was decoded using the Viterbialgorithm. Code was assumed to be the outputof a convolutional encoder specified by theMATLAB(R) structure Trellis.3)Poly2trellis was used for a valid Trellis structure.Each symbol in Code consists oflog2(Trellis.numOutputSymbols) bits.4)Decoded is a vector in the same orientation asCode and each of its symbols consists oflog2(TRELLIS.numInputSymbols) bits.5)Tblen is a positive integer scalar that specifiesthe traceback depth. Table 2 summarises theViterbi algorithm parameters.Table 2.Viterbi algorithm parametersParameter ValuenumInputSymbolsnumOutputSymbolsnumStatestblenopmodedectype241287trunchardE.MMF Response ModelThe block diagram of the ROMMF system used for analysis and simulation is shown in Fig 6. In this system the COFDM signal generated out of the OFDM transmitter was directly injected into the laser diode (LD) at the desired signal level. The optical intensity signal out of the LD is fed into an MMF followed by a photodetector. The received COFDM signal will be demodulated and decoded to retrieve the data. This system can be used for analysing the performance of the optical link alone for the OFDM input. Table 3 summarizes MMF parameters.modulation and direct detection.Table 3.MMF parametersParameter Value Fiber dispersion -100 ps/(nm km)Fiber attenuation 1.25 dB/km Wavelength Fiber length1300 nm 2 kmII. R ESULTS AND D ISCUSSIONUp to this moment, the simulation only considers some important combination of parameters that are dominant in optical data transmission. The encoded sequence is split into 32 sub carriers. The data is then modulated using 16 QAM/ 4 bits per symbol or QPSK/ 4 bits per symbol, then carried by different frequencies of each sub carrier to have the orthogonality between the sub carriers. All other parameters that have been used in this transmitter part are already explained in the previous section. Fig 7 and 8 shows the RF spectrum for I (in phase) and Q (quadrature) component of OFDM modulator.Fig7. RF spectrum of I component of OFDM modulator.Fig8. RF spectrum of Q component of OFDM modulator.Further in this section results from the transmission link, which are in optical domain, are presented. The function of transmission link is to convert the electrical domain signal from the transmitter part into optical domain signal so the COFDM signal could be sent through the fiber. To do this CW laser and external modulator i.e. MZM to modulate the signal of COFDM is used. The wavelength for CW laser is set to 1300 nm, while the rest are to be set into default values from the Optisystem. The fiber length for the transmitting the signals is 2 Km. The result from transmission link after COFDM signal was optically modulated by MZM is shown in Fig 9 where the power of the signal is -69.0592dBm.Fig9. COFDM optically modulated by MZMAfter optically modulated, the signal is then transmitted through the pre-amplifier and then fiber link. The signal after MMF can be seen from the Fig 10 below.Fig10. Signal through fiber.From both Fig 9 and 10 it can be seen that the wavelength is 1300 nm but the power from both signals is different. The optically modulated signal is amplified (gain 12 dB) and passed through MMF. From the Fig 10 above it can be analyzed that now signal has increased power from -69.0592dBm to -58.5374 dBm. The amplification is necessary to be done before the signal is transmitted through the optical fiber to reduce the effect of loss possibility from the signal. Further the optical signal from MMF is post-amplified and is shown in the Fig 11. The signal power further increased from -58.5374 dBm to -45.3038 dBm.Fig11. Signal after post-amplification.After optically modulated and being transmitted over fiber link, the optical domain signal is then converted back into electrical domain signal by PIN photodetector at the receiver part. The PIN photodetector used in this simulation has responsivity 1 A/W. Fig 12 and 13 below show the I and Q components of OFDM demodulator using M-ary Sequence Visualizer.Fig12. M-ary sequence of I component of OFDM demodulator.Fig13. M-ary sequence of Q component of OFDM demodulator. BER analyzer, both a visualizer and a receiver component is used, in that it simulates the conversion of electrical pulses into logical 1s and 0s and gives Q factor values. Firstly the simulative model’s performance was analyzed for COFDM/OFDM for radio over multi mode fiber system. The Fig 14 below shows the analysis of COFDM and OFDM with 16 QAM modulation technique based upon the same set of parameters for both the techniques. It can be seen from the Fig below that QAM when used with coded OFDM gives higher values of Q than used with uncoded OFDM, such as at 600 Mbps COFDM (QAM) gives Q = 8.214 while OFDM (QAM) gives Q = 7.447 respectively. Also as the data rate increases the Q factor degrades below the valid Q value (Q = 6 for telecommunication systems) for both COFDM and OFDM. Typical error rates for optical fiber telecommunication systems range from 10-9to 10-12. It is quoted that BER value 10-9 corresponds to a Q value 6 [18].Fig14. Analysis of COFDM and OFDM with 16 QAM.Fig15. Analysis of COFDM and OFDM with QPSK.Then the model was analyzed for its performance with QPSK modulation technique for both COFDM and OFDM. The Fig 15 above shows the analysis of COFDM and OFDM with QPSK modulation technique based upon the same set of parameters. It can be seen from the Fig that QPSK when used with coded OFDM gives higher values of Q than used with uncoded OFDM, such as at 600 Mbps COFDM (QPSK) gives Q = 9.050 while OFDM (QPSK) gives Q = 8.572 and at 700 Mbps COFDM (QPSK) gives Q = 8.070 while OFDM (QPSK) gives Q = 6.550 respectively. Further as the data rate increases the Q factor degrades below the valid Q value (Q = 6 for telecommunication systems) for both COFDM and OFDM. From both the Fig’s 14 and 15 COFDM gave higher values of Q-Factor than OFDM for same set of simulative parameters.From [19] Optical Amplifier gives higher values of Q-Factor than EDFA with either of the modulation techniques (QAM/QPSK). So the performance of the simulative model (COFDM based RoMMF System) was analyzed to find the better modulation technique between QAM and QPSK when used with Optical Amplifier in terms of parameter Q-factor, for same set of simulative parameters.Fig16. Analysis of QAM/QPSK using optical amplifier Here Fig 16 above shows the performance analysis for QAM/QPSK when used with an Optical Amplifier in COFDM based RoMMF system. It can be seen that for bit rates used in simulation QPSK with Optical Amplifier gives higher Quality Factor than QAM gives with Optical Amplifier. As from the Fig at 600 Mbps QAM gives Q = 8.214 while QPSK gives Q = 9.050. Therefore between QPSK and QAM modulation technique when used with Optical Amplifier for this simulative model for same set of simulative parameters, QPSK can be seen as better modulation technique (in terms of Q).III.C ONCLUSIONSThe study of incorporating COFDM modulation technique with RoF technology was essential for nowadays implementation of optical communication. The combination of the advantages from COFDM and RoF provided a medium haul communication network. In this paper, the simulation of COFDM scheme for RoMMF system has been completely done by using software Optisystem and MATLAB(R), for different modulation techniques to observe impact on system parameter [Quality Factor (Q)]. Some consideration has been added to system design in order to meet the applicable design for using in the reality. Influence of increasing bit rates has been observed for 2 km long linear multimode fiber. To reduce loss due to multi mode fiber, convolutional encoder (code rate ½, generator polynomial 1338, 1718) and Viterbi hard decision decoding algorithm are chosen for simulative model of COFDM based RoF system.The model was analyzed for COFDM to be better technique than OFDM for RoMMF system. The analysis showed that QAM/QPSK modulation techniques gave higher Q values (at 600 Mbps COFDM (QAM) gave Q = 8.214 while OFDM (QAM) gave Q = 7.447 respectively and at 600 Mbps COFDM (QPSK) gave Q = 9.050 while OFDM (QPSK) gave Q = 8.572 and at 700 Mbps COFDM (QPSK) gave Q = 8.070 while OFDM (QPSK) gave Q = 6.550 respectively) when used with COFDM rather than with OFDM for same simulative model using same set of parameters (from Fig No. 14 and 15).Since in [19] it was concluded that Optical Amplifier gave higher Q values than EDFA with COFDM based RoMMF system, further analysis using Optical Amplifier was done in this paper to analyse better modulation technique between QAM/QPSK for this simulative model. QPSK modulation technique gave better results (i.e. higher Q values as at 600 Mbps QAM gave Q = 8.214 while QPSK gave Q = 9.050) than QAM modulation technique (from Fig No. 16). This system design is best suitable for medium haul communication using MMF with QPSK modulation technique and using optical amplifier for reducing the signal loss.A CKNOWLEDGMENTIn the name of almighty I would like to give sincere appreciation to Prof. Renu Vig, Director, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University for providing the infrastructure and environment that made everything run smoothly. I am also very grateful to my parents and friends for their worthy co-operation, without their help, it would not have been possible to complete this study.R EFERENCES[1] Hamed Al Raweshidy, Shozo Komaki, Radio over fiber technologies for mobile communications networks, pp. 128-132 (2002).[2]Ng’oma, Design of a radio-over-fiber system for wireless LANs, Report Number: tue wp6 pub 02 v01, (2002).[3] Guennec, Y.l., Pizzinat, A., Meyer, S., et al., Low-cost transparent radio-over-fiber system for in- building distribution of UWB signals, pp. 2649–2657 (2009).[4]E. Sackinger, Broadband Circuits for Optical Fiber Communication, John Wiley & Sons, p. 11 (2005). [5] Stott, J.H., The DVB terrestrial (DVB-T) specification and its implementation in a practical modem, pp. 255-260 (1996).[6]I. Haroun and F. Gouin, WLANs meet fiber optics: evaluating 802.11a WLANs over fiber optic links, http: ///ar/radio−wlans−meet−fiber/. [7]Tolga Kurt, Abbas Yongacoglu and Jean-Yves Chouinard, OFDM and Externally Modulated Multi-mode Fibers in Radio over Fiber Systems, IEEE Transactions on wireless communications, pp. 2669-2674 (2006). [8]D. Gloge and A. J. Marcatili, Multimode theory of graded-core fibers, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 52, p.1563 (1973).[9] A.M. Matarneh, S.S.A. Obayya, Bit-error ratio performance for radio over multimode fiber system using coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, pp. 151–157 (2011).[10]Aser M. Matarneh, S. S. A. Obayya, I. D. Robertson, Coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing transmission over graded index multimode fiber, (2007).[11]Shikha Mahajan and Naresh Kumar, COFDM for Radio over Multimode Fiber: a Review, IJCA special issues on IP Multimedia Communications, pp. 68-71 (2011).[12]Arun Agarwal, Kabita Agarwal, Design and Simulation of COFDM for High Speed Wireless Communication and Performance Analysis, pp. 22-28 (2011).[13]Dixon, B.J., R.D., Iezekiel, S., Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing in wireless communication systems with multimode fiber feeds, pp. 1404–1409 (2001).[14]Weon-cheol Lee, Hyung-Mo Park,Kyung-jin Kang and Kuen-bae Kim, Performance Analysis of Viterbi Decoder Using Channel State Information in COFDM System, IEEE transactions on broadcasting vol. 44, pp. 488-496 (1988).[15]Ramjee Prasad, OFDM for wireless Communications systems, Artech House (2004). [16]William Y. Zou and Yiyan Wu, COFDM: An Overview, IEEE transactions on broadcasting, vol.41, pp 1-8 (1995).[17]Aníbal Luis Intini, Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing for Wireless Networks, University Of California, Santa Barbara (2000).[18] Gerd Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications, McGraw-Hill Series in Electrical Engineering, (2000).[19] Shikha Mahajan, Naresh Kumar, Performance Analysis of Coded OFDM Signal for Radio over Fiber Transmission, IORS Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Volume 1,pp. 49-52 (2012).Shikha Mahajan is currently doing M.Efrom University Institute of Engineeringand Technology, Panjab University,Chandigarh. She has received her B.Techdegree from Punjab Technical University,Jalandhar, India. Her interests include Radio over Fibers and Computer Networks.Naresh Kumar received his M.E.Degree in Electronics Engineering fromPEC, Chandigarh in 2004. Presently heis working as an Assistant Professor atUIET, Panjab University Chandigarhsince 2005. His field of specialization includes Digital & wireless communication, Cognitive Radio Networks , Radio over fiber etc.。