怎样写好国外期刊修改稿的Cover_Letter
- 格式:doc
- 大小:42.00 KB
- 文档页数:7
sci 投稿cover letter写作模板尊敬的SCI杂志编辑:
我谨提交我研究团队的最新论文,题目为《XXX》。
我们深信这篇论文将为贵刊的读者带来新的视角和启发,希望能够得到您的审阅和考虑。
我们的研究主要围绕XXX展开,经过长时间的实验和数据分析,我们得出了令人振奋的结果。
通过本研究,我们不仅深化了对XXX的理解,同时也为相关领域的未来研究提供了有益的参考。
我们选择将这篇论文提交给贵刊,是因为我们深知贵刊在该领域的权威和影响力。
我们期待着能够借助贵刊的平台,与广大同行分享我们的研究成果,并为学术界的发展贡献自己的力量。
在此,我代表全体作者感谢您对我们论文的重视和关注。
我们将非常乐意听取您的意见和建议,希望能够与您携手共同推动学术研究的进步。
再次感谢您抽出时间来审阅我们的论文,期待早日收到您的回复。
谢谢!
此致
作者:XXX
XXX大学
日期:XXXX年XX月XX日。
英文文章coverletter[五篇材料]第一篇:英文文章 cover letter1、什么是cover letter?指的是投稿信2、cover letter的内容主要包括那些?应该简述所投稿件的核心内容、主要发现和意义,拟投期刊,对稿件处理有无特殊要求等(如“not to review” list)。
另外,请附上主要作者的中文姓名、通讯地址、电话、传真和e-mail地址。
此外有的杂志要求推荐几位审稿人及其联系方式。
以及谁已经阅读过该文(当然是牛人)。
我投的那个杂志是要求说明你论文研究的意义,以及与这个杂志的相关性,另外还有的可能要写明你没有一搞多投等。
此外临床实验要求写明符合伦理学要求。
3、如何写cover letter?各个杂志的具体要求是不一样的,在杂志的guide for authors一般会有要求。
如果没有具体的要求,大家可按照通用要求处理。
4、常用模板:(1)Cover letterDear Mr.**1.The work described has not been submitted elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part, and all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.2.I have read and have abided by the statement of ethical standards for manuscripts submitted to Neuroscience.kind regards.Your sincerely,通讯作者(2)Dear Dr.主编name:We submit our manuscript entitled “ 文章title” to 杂志名for publication.接着简单介绍你文章的主要创新点和意义,不易过多,但要突出新意和关键点。
SCI投稿Cover Letter模板初次投稿SCI的科研小白而言,真的需要一份Cover Letter的模板,能尽快的上手。
许多期刊都会要求作者上传手稿的时候附上Cover Letter,主要是写给该期刊的总编辑看到,需要简明扼要的介绍手稿的研究内容与期刊的方向是否一致,有什么新的研究,创新点在哪里,也需要添加期刊要求的声明和披露,最后是投稿人的姓名及联系信息。
下面是简短的一个模板,根据实际需要进行修改。
Dear Prof. Editor(最好是加上编辑的名字,以表示尊重):We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “文章的标题”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “期刊名称”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.This manuscript describes original work and is not under consideration by any other journal.简明扼要的描述实验的主要结果和重要结论,我们相信这项研究的结果将对“期刊名称”的读者特别感兴趣。
SCI的coverletter+催稿信+修稿回复一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated ……(简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail:××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.I f you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor”has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××Dear Editor, I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript which is submitted on Jun 24. The manuscript number is “SERREV-D-14-00023” and title is “Prediction and Structural Analysis of Impact Factor for Journals Indexed in SCI: A Case Study of Nature”. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for me. With best regards Sincerely yoursSCI投稿---稿件状态咨询信四个范例范例一(推荐):邮件标题:Inquire about the status of manuscript (No: XXXX) 正文:Dear Editor,Sorry for disturbing you.I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled "XXXX" (ID: XXXX) although the status of "QUEUED FOR REVIEW" for my manuscript have been lasting for XXXX months.I am just wondering that my manuscript has been send to reviewers or not?I am very pleased to hear from you. Thank you very much for your consideration.Yours sincerely,XXXE-mail: xxx@xxxx范例二:Dear Editor,It has been 4 months since we submitted our manuscript(ID:je-2008-00649n)to the journal office. I write this email to ask whether our paper has been accepted. And if is still being reviewed, when can I get the information of the final result?I would very much appreciate you if you could afford a little time to answer these question. Thank a lot!XXXX范例三:Dear Editor,I'm the first author of the article (No. ********) submitted to your journal about 3 months ago. I'm sorry writing to you to ask about its review progress. Many thanks and looking forward for your reply!Best wishes!Yours sincerely,*******范例四:Dear editor,Paper No.: ***Paper Title: ***We submitted the paper three months ago. Could you give us update information on the current status of our submission? If there is anything that we can do, please let us know. Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much for your time.Yours sincerelyXXXX三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..(写上负责你文章编辑的姓名,显得尊重,因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑,只能用通用的Editors): On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分)List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
写cover letter,可以分大致三四个段落。
第一段,大意就是表明想把什么稿件投到哪个期刊。
这里要注意几个小问题。
第一,还是信件开头的称呼。
如果期刊有公开编辑的信息,可以考虑选择直接致信其中某位编辑,比如“Dear Dr. XX”。
如果找不到这方面的信息,写“T o whom it may concern”也是可以的。
因为在投稿的阶段,作者一般确实无法预知稿件会到哪一位编辑的手里(当然,一旦编辑回复作者,接下来的交流就无疑不要再用Dear Edit or或者To who it may concern之类的模糊语了,直接称呼该位编辑Dear Dr. XX即可)。
第二,要写明自己所投稿件的标题,最好注上最基本的信息,包括总字数,总图(figure)数和总表(T able)数。
第三,要写明所投期刊的全名,比如Journal of Neuroscience,而不是笼统地说“贵刊”。
第二段的任务是大致介绍所投稿件的重要信息。
请注意,这个介绍和摘要(abstract)有所不同,不要把文章摘要原封不动地照抄一边。
介绍的目的不仅是让期刊编辑对论文稿件的基本内容有所了解,也有一些向编辑“推销”(sell)稿件的意味。
在实事求是的基础上,可以用一些比较抓人眼球的用词,以特别强调文章的独特之处,以及其为什么特别值得在该期刊上发表。
同时,应该考虑到期刊编辑虽然一般都具有博士学历,但很可能专业和论文的领域并不一致。
所以,在介绍的时候,要尽量用通俗易懂的方式介绍一些相关基本概念。
而不是在很紧张的写作中,下意识以为无论自己写下什么专业术语,期刊编辑都一定能立刻心领神会。
第三段,按照许多期刊的规定,需要做一些必要的声明。
比如,确认本文没有同时投给其它期刊,作者之间是否存在利益冲突(conflict of interest),确认所有实验遵从道德要求(et hical requirements)等等。
最后,要记得留下联系作者(corresponding author)的联系方式(邮件,电话)。
(文章开头)亲爱的读者,今天我将为你介绍一篇专门为科学论文返修而设计的cover letter模板。
这是一篇旨在帮助科研人员更好地应对论文返修问题的文章,通过详细解析返修cover letter的写作要点,希望能够帮助到大家。
(文章主体)1. 让我们来了解什么是返修的cover letter。
返修是指在发表科学论文时,编辑或审稿人建议对稿件进行修改时,作者需要根据建议进行修订,并提交一份cover letter说明修订的具体内容和原因。
返修的cover letter在整个修改过程中起到了至关重要的作用,它不仅可以解释作者对审稿意见的回应,也可以陈述作者在修订过程中的改动和理由。
2. 针对返修的cover letter,需要注意的写作要点有哪些呢?要清晰地列出审稿人提出的意见和建议,这些要点在cover letter中需要得到充分的关注。
需要对每一条意见进行解释和回应,表明作者对审稿人的建议进行了认真的思考和修改。
要在cover letter中突出说明修订带来的变化对于论文质量的提升和对于问题解决的有效性。
3. 在撰写cover letter时,除了以上要点,还需要考虑一些细节问题。
用词要准确、逻辑要清晰、语气要尊重等等。
还要对修订过程中的关键改动做出适当的强调,让编辑和审稿人能够清晰地理解作者的修改意图。
(文章总结)通过对返修cover letter的写作要点进行详细的讲解,相信读者们对于如何撰写一份高质量的cover letter有了更清晰的认识。
在返修过程中,cover letter能够帮助作者更好地与编辑和审稿人进行沟通,是非常重要的一环。
我们应该在写作过程中认真对待每一份cover letter,在保证专业性和客观性的基础上,突出作者对于审稿意见的积极态度和认真态度。
(个人观点和理解)作为一名科研工作者,我深切地意识到返修cover letter的重要性。
在过去的科研实践中,我也曾多次面对论文返修的情况,逐渐摸索出了一套适合自己的cover letter写作方法。
修改稿cover,letter模板篇一:SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览(Cover letter,催稿信等) 一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of inter est exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not beenpublished previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated ?? (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name AE-mail: ××××@××××2) Name BE-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hearfrom you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..(写上负责你文章编辑的姓名,显得尊重,因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑,只能用通用的Editors):On behalf of my co- authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructivecomments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, whichwe would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分)List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (??简要列出意见??) Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (??简要列出意见??) Response: ××××××。
怎样写好国外期刊修改稿的CoverLetter怎样写好国外期刊修改稿的Cover LetterCover Letter是一篇文章的外衣,对国外投稿能否成功很关键,一般投稿时的Cover Letter并不是很重要,只要说明你稿件的研究方向及创新点,并声明没有在其他期刊发表过.最难写的就是Revised Manuscript中的Cover Letter,这将关系到是否录用你的稿件,或要进一步审稿.国外专家讲求的是精益求精,老外们对文章都很严谨的,一个单词哪怕是一个介词的使用都是很有考究的,因此会提出很多似乎对文章无关紧要的修改意见,但是这你要给予充分的重视.通过国外发表几篇文章后,开始一直失败,但是我没有放弃,通过总结现在将一些经验和大家分享,以免大家走很多不必要的弯路.为了更好理解,我用我发的一篇文章作为例子来说明:这里是期刊审稿人的修改意见:Dear *****,The review of your manuscript, Thermal Decomposition and Kinetics Studies on 1, 4-dinitropiperazine (DNP), submitted to Journal of Hazardous Materials has been completed. The reviewers recommend the need for minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript according to the reviewers' comments attached, and re-submit to me your revised version of the manuscript including an itemized response to each reviewer's comments.Please submit your revised submission before Jul 11, 2007. I will then begin the re-review process.Please note that revised manuscripts will be sent for review because revising a manuscript does not automatically mean it will be accepted for publication.For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.Please ensure that the article conforms to the format of the Journal. In particular make sure that all the articles in your references have titles included. The Journal Guide for Authors is available on the Journal homepage [url]/locate/hazmat[/url]When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.Once again, thank you for your interest in Journal of Hazardous Materials.Yours sincerely,Merv Fingas, PhDEditorJournal of Hazardous MaterialsReviewers' comments:Reviewer #1: The paper reports on the thermal decomposition and kinetics of DNP.It is a welcome addition to the literature and appectable forpublication after some revision:(i) Please provide large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP.(ii) Please assign ALL IR bands of Fig. 5Reviewer #2: authors have carried out work on the thermal analysis of the dinitropiperazine. The new information reported in the paper is scanty. The large amount of data has been already reported by the several researchers on the thermal analysis of dinitropiperazine (See the reference section of the paper and also reviewer has done the scopus search). The only new information reported in this paper is of the T-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to the existing scientific data base. There is not much novelty in the reported work.The Table 1 and figure 1 need to be deleted from the paper since it is already well reported in the literature.Table 2 and figure 3 gives the same information. Authors are requested to delete Table 2 and the same information may be explained in the results and discussion part of the paper.May i also kindly request authors to update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper using Chemical abstracts on disk (CA on CD) data base.The quality and clarity of the figures in the paper need to be improved.English need to be improved.The paper is recommended for short communication after the minor revision.Reviewer #3: The paper is okay in terms of contents.However,since it has been written bya Chinese, the english is very poor and as such requires a lot of corrections and editing by your team.The authors have used ozawa and Kissenger methods to find out activationenergy.However,they have given data for activation energy by ozawa methodonly under 3.4 thermal decomposition kinetics).The data for Eo by Kissenger methods shouldalso be included in the paper.Also,captions of Figs 1,3 &5 are missing.Reviewer #4: This paper is promising but could be improved by better kinetic analysis.1. Kissinger's method is OK as a first approximation, but Friedman's method is the best isoconversional method. Even Ozawa has abandoned his method in favor of Friedman's.2. The method of comparing a large number of kinetic models against data at a single heating rate (page 5) is invalid, discredited, and should not be published. This issue has been discussed in several papers by Vyzovkin and in a international kinetic study published by Brown et al, Thermochemica Acta 355, 125-143, 2000, and following papers. Consequently, there is noreal evidence presented that the equation is first-order. In fact, from my studies of energetic materials, including RDX and HMX, I would have thought that nucleation-growth kinetics would be most appropriate. However, I would have to do a more rigorous kinetic analysis of the data to know for sure.3. The best way to judge a kinetic model is how it compares with data at multiple heating rates (using a single set of parameters). Such a comparison is not present in this paper, so it is difficult to judge the validity of the kinetic parameters.4. The author's discussion of HMX kinetics is good in some respects but out of date in others. More recent papers by multiple institutions place the activation energy for HMX closer to 150 kJ/mol. A commonly cited paper on this is by Wight and Vyazovkin, Ann Rev Phys Chem 48, 119, 1997. A more recent but harder paper to get is by Burnham and Weese in the proceedings of the 2005 ICT conference. Henson has published a correlation in the detonation symposium showing that explosion times scale with an activation energy of about 150 kJ/mol. Active workers in energetic materials should have access to these materials.看完了这个,是不是会觉得很头疼,是的老外就是这么认真.要求很具体仔细,审稿细致深入.下面就是看你怎么样回复这篇审稿意见了.我回复后的第三天就收到论文录用通知,估计他们没有再次送给审稿专家重审.因为我的Cover Letter他很满意,我是这样写的:Dear ***,My manuscript, *********************(论文题目), was revised according to the reviewers' comments, and the itemizedresponse to each reviewer’s comments is attached. Many thanks for your suggestion. I am so sorry to bring you so much trouble because of our careless. Correspondence and phone calls about this paper should be directed to ****(作者)at the following address,phone and e-mail:Address: *********Tel.: ********Fax:*******E-mail: **********Thanks very much again for your attention to our paper.Once again, thank you for your help to our paper processing.Yours sincerely,******For your guidance, itemized response to each reviewer’s comments is appended below.Dear reviewer #1:(i) Suhithi M. Peiris, Richard, etc. (J. Phys. Chem. A, 104 (39), 8898 -8907, 2000. 10.1021) had already reported large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP.(ii) We assigned all IR bands of Fig.5 (now change to fig.8).(iii) Because of the IR study had been reported, the IR spectra (fig.1) was deleted form the paper. Anyway, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.Dear reviewer #2:(i) G. V. Sitonina, etc. (Russian Chemical Bulletin, Vol.28, 284-288) A study has been made of the kinetics of thermaldecomposition of dinitropiperazine, in melts and in solution. As you said, the only new information reported in this paper is of the T-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to the existing scientific data base. Nevertheless, the kinetics study in our paper is a supplement which is with multi-heating rate method.(ii) The Table 1 and figure 1 was deleted from the paper and the correlative references were put forward.(iii) Table 2 was deleted and the same information was explained in the results and discussion part of the paper.(iv) We had update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper and enriched the introduction of the paper.(v) The figures were drawn again and the quality and clarity of them were improved.(vi) English expression w as improved a little and it’s my great honor to ask your help on the language aspect.Dear reviewer #3:(i) As a Chinese, our English is very poor and a few of corrections and editing had done by our team.(ii) Now we only used Ozawa method to find out activation energy and you can check it in our paper again. According to reviewer #4, Kissinger method is invalid, discredited, and should not be published.(iii) Figures and captions of them are changed.(iv) At last, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.Dear reviewer #4:i. This paper was improved by a better kinetic analysis. The kinetic parameters were established by Ozawa's isoconversional method because there is no Friedman's calculation program in our institute.ii. As you just said, the method of comparing a large number of kinetic models against data at a single heating rate is invalid. After the kinetic study by isoconversional method with data at multiple heating rates, we found that nucleation-growth kinetics is more appropriate. You are seasoned in these aspects and it’s my great honor to ask your advice on these sorts of aspects.iii. In order to judge a kinetic model, we did a comparison a single heating rate method with multi-heating method, and at last the kinetic parameters were judged.iv. You are right; the discussion of HMX kinetics is really out of date. The activation energy for HMX is closer to 150 kJ/mol. We had done the improvements in our paper.v. From your comments, it’s obvious that you are an expert in thermo analysis, and there is lots of shortage in our study which need your instruction. At last, I want to thank you sincerely for your suggestions and I feel so sorry that so much of your precious time was wasted on our paper revision.这样的回复看似很复杂,其实这很有必要,你的回答一定要有条理并且要有针对性,针对每一个专家的意见分别做出自己的回应,其实这篇信也叫Response Letter. 这样一来,老外看出了你的一丝不苟,即使还有一些需要修正的小错误,他们也就不在乎了,自己帮你修正了.其实我们所处的专业不同,期刊的要求不同,专家的性格也不一样.但是总的来说就是四个字"一丝不苟",一定要认真对待修改意见.一般论文投到国外,如果满足期刊内容要求的前提下,一般会给你一个修改意见,不会直接拒绝.即使拒绝也是在第一次修改不满足要求的情况下拒绝的.他们想的是你改都改不好,还有什么话说.最后,我希望大家多多发表高质量的科技论文,多到国外投稿,这样不是为了多几篇SCI,是多增加国际交流,给自身的发展创造条件.特别是对于想出国深造的研究学者们.谨以此和大家共勉!本文多有论述不当之处,望大家批评指正!谢谢!。
教你往国外杂志投稿的COVER LETTER如何写我这是转载的,不知道原创是谁..冒犯了.一、投稿信往国外杂志投稿,就是写COVER LETTER,主要内容应该有: 简述所投稿件的核心内容、主要发现和意义,拟投期刊,对稿件处理有无特殊要求等(如“not to review” list)。
另外,请附上主要作者的中文姓名、通讯地址、电话、传真和e-mail地址。
此外有的杂志要求推荐几位审稿人及其联系方式。
以及谁已经阅读过该文(当然是牛人)。
最后给一个模板:Dear Dr. 主编name: We submit our manuscript entitled " 文章title" to 杂志名for publication. 接着简单介绍你文章的主要创新点和意义,不易过多,但要突出新意和关键点。
All authors have seen the manuscript and approved to submit to your journal. Thank you very much for your attention and consideration. Sincerely yours, 通讯作者[search]投稿信[/search] 1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML: I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A: Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are s ubmitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A: Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” b y sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript,and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source. We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors, We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors,It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见 1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below. 2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below. 3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added. 5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - . 6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made somecorrection at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory. 7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker. 8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined. 9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays. 10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that – One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result. 2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission. 3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our ma nuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval. 4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed. 5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red. 6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript 7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence. 8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision. 9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account. 10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper. 11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data. 12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available. 13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section. 14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential. 15. The running title has been changed to “”. 16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase. 17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error. 18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2). 19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added. 20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4. 21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section.These are: 22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication. 23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication. 24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper. 25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees。
SCI论⽂投稿信(CoverLetter)的写法及模版(转)⼀、写法投稿信(Cover Letter)应该简述所投稿件的核⼼内容、主要发现和意义,拟投期刊,对稿件处理有⽆特殊要求等(如“not to review”list)。
另外,请附上主要作者的中⽂姓名、通讯地址、电话、传真和e-mail地址。
此外有的杂志要求推荐⼏位审稿⼈及其联系⽅式。
以及谁已经阅读过该⽂(当然是⽜⼈)。
⼀般来说,杂志通常要求说明你论⽂研究的意义,以及与这个杂志的相关性,另外还有的可能要写明你没有⼀搞多投等。
此外临床实验要求写明符合伦理学要求。
当然各个杂志的具体要求是不⼀样的,在杂志的guide for authors⼀般会有要求。
如果没有具体的要求,⼤家可按照通⽤要求处理。
⼆、模版Dear Prof. XXXXX,Here within enclosed is our paper for consideration to be published on “(Journal name)”. The further information about the paper is in the following:The Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXThe Authors: XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXThe authors claim that none of the material in the paper has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere.I am the corresponding author and my address and other information is as follows,Address: Department of XXXXXXXXX,Tsinghua University,Beijing, 10084,P.R.ChinaE-mail:Tel: 86-10-62785001Fax: 86-10-62785001Thank you very much for consideration!Sincerely Yours,Dr. XXXXXXXXXXX1.第⼀次投稿Cover letter:主要任务是介绍⽂章主要创新以及声明没有⼀稿多投Dear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍⼀下论⽂的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××2.催稿信:询问稿件处理到声明步骤Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: ⽂章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××3.修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..(写上负责你⽂章编辑的姓名,显得尊重,因为第⼀次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑,只能⽤通⽤的Editors):On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: ⽂章稿号). We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××4.修改稿回答审稿⼈的意见(最重要的部分)List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: ⽂章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
SCI论⽂投稿之投稿信(CoverLetter)写法--附真实案例⽂章⽬录1 Cover Letter 是什么?Cover Letter, 即投稿信,是论⽂投递时与论⽂⼀起发送给编辑的信件,其⽬的是让编辑在阅读你的论⽂之前,简单了解你⽂章的基本情况。
2 主要包含什么内容1. 期刊编辑的姓名不知道编辑是谁的情况下直接⽤ Dear editor; 但是,只要⽤⼼⼀点,去期刊官⽹查找,⼀般都能找到的。
2. 投稿⽂章的标题在以第⼀段直接给出⽂章的标题3. 投稿⽂章的类型如 Letter, communications, article, review还是comments。
这个其实也可以不写,因为在投稿时会选择投稿⽂章类型。
4. 论⽂简介简要包括研究背景,发现以及可以发表在期刊上的原因等等5. 作者信息⼀般为通讯作者姓名,所属机构,通讯地址,联系电话,邮箱等经将这⼀部分挪到了投稿⽹站系统上,Cover letter中可以不再列出)讲了这么多,分享⼀个实际的案例吧。
案例–第⼀次投稿怎么写主体内容Dear Dr. Ciaccio, 杂志主编On behalf of all coauthors, I am submitting our manuscript entitled “⽂章标题”for your consideration for publication in Biology and Medicine.我谨代表所有合著者,提交我们题为“⽂章标题”的⼿稿,供您考虑在⽣物学和医学上发表。
Although there has been a large amount of research focusing on medical image segmentation, few studies have focused specifically on the segmentation of tiny organs.The difficulty of tiny organ segmentation is that the shape varies greatly among individuals and the boundary with surrounding tissues is not clear.In the current study, we proposed a ⽅法, which successfully solves the above two difficulties. The experimental resultsshow that our proposed ⽅法 outperforms the state-of-the-art deep learning method in segmenting xxx with respect to accuracy.Another strength of our method is that it requires fewer trainable parameters and imposes a smaller demand on computational resources.The proposed method can potentially assist clinicians in diagnosis and treatment planning by quickly inspecting abnormalities in xxx and further quantitative analysis.虽然已经有⼤量的研究集中在医学图像分割上,但是很少有研究专门针对微⼩器官的分割。
投稿cover letter写作模板Coverletter写作是一项重要的任务,不仅关乎写作者自身的技巧和水平,也关乎发表机构对作者的理解和评判。
为了提升写作者的cover letter写作水平,特别提供以下模板供参考,以帮助作者更准确有效地进行cover letter写作。
一、写作前准备投稿前,首先需要进行充分的文献研究和准备,以及梳理研究文献和论文的相关思路。
1、研究背景:一般来说,在投稿前需要对研究背景进行充分的了解,以更好地把握研究方向,并选择最佳的投稿途径。
2、研究目的:在进行cover letter写作之前,应该先明确研究目的,明晰研究的意义,以便在投稿时表达更清晰。
3、研究方法:熟悉研究方法可以更好地传达研究目的,并有助于表达研究成果。
4、研究总结:研究成果还需要用清晰的表达方式给出总结,以便读者能够快速了解研究内容。
二、投稿的cover letter一份cover letter的写作必须具备精准的信息,突出研究的重点,同时还能够表达出作者的信心,以便读者能够更加准确地了解研究内容。
1、文章概述:在写作cover letter时,作者需要概述论文中文章的主题,构思和观点,以便读者能够快速了解文章主旨。
2、研究成果:作者需要在cover letter中全面介绍论文的主要研究成果,并将这些内容以简洁有力的文字表达出来,以便读者能够把握文章精髓。
3、研究特色:介绍论文的主要特色,比如使用的数据、文献的创新价值等,以便能够更好地表达研究成果的独特之处,同时也能让读者在第一时间了解到论文的创新性。
4、最终评论:在cover letter末尾,作者可以提出自己的最终评论,向读者展示作者对论文的深刻理解和独到见解,以此为发表单位留下深刻的印象。
三、写作技巧cover letter的写作技巧能够帮助作者更好地完成cover letter的写作任务,提升写作水平:1、简洁明了:一份cover letter写作要求简洁明了,不过度拐弯抹角,也不要让文章过于罗唆,简洁有力的文字可以让读者更容易把握文章的精髓;2、语言连贯:cover letter的写作要求做到语言表达连贯,同时也要保证句子表达清晰,使用统一的文体,不要出现不必要的错别字;3、分段有序:每段的内容要有从属关系,要顺序清晰,每一段的内容也要有主题,不要出现无关的内容;4、检查校对:在完成投稿 cover letter的写作之后,作者要及时检查校对,检查文章的表达是否准确,以免影响文章的发表。
英文投稿邮件写作模板一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name AE-mail: ××××@××××2) Name BE-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..(写上负责你文章编辑的姓名,显得尊重,因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑,只能用通用的Editors):On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分)List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
尊敬的编辑委员会:我是XXX,来自XXX大学XXX研究团队的一名研究人员。
我想再次向您提交我们团队对于XXX方面的研究成果。
我理解您之前对我们提交的稿件所提出的拒稿意见,但经过我们团队的再次努力,我们已经对稿件进行了重大改进,并针对您提出的意见进行了深入的修改。
感谢您抽出宝贵的时间来审阅我们的稿件。
在此,我想就我们的研究成果重新提交给您,并就我们的研究成果向您进行较为详细的说明。
1. 研究背景:我国XXX方面的研究热点已经逐渐成为国际学术界关注的焦点。
在XXX的研究中,我们经过了XXX年的努力,已经取得了一系列的重要研究成果。
2. 研究内容:我们的研究主要集中在XXX方面的XXX,并在这一领域取得了重要的突破。
我们利用了XXX的研究方法,通过XXX的实验手段,对XXX进行了深入的探究,并取得了一系列重要的研究结果。
3. 研究意义:我们的研究成果对于XXX领域的进一步发展具有重要的理论和实践意义。
我们的研究成果在XXX方面具有重要的指导意义,并且对XXX的发展具有重要的推动作用。
4. 对于之前拒稿意见的回应:在您之前的拒稿意见中,您提出了XXX方面的意见。
我们在此针对您提出的每一条意见,进行了认真的修改。
我们相信,我们的修改可以符合您的审稿要求。
我们深信我们的研究成果符合贵刊的发表要求,我们诚恳地希望您能再次审阅我们的稿件,并给予我们一次发表的机会。
我们期待能够在贵刊上发表我们的研究成果,与广大学者共同交流,共同促进XXX领域的研究发展。
再次感谢您的审阅,期待您的回复。
此致敬礼XXX 敬上尊敬的编辑委员会:我是XXX,来自XXX大学XXX研究团队的一名研究人员。
非常感谢您在之前对我们提交的稿件进行审阅,并提供宝贵的意见。
经过我们团队的再次努力,我们对稿件进行了重大改进,并认真针对您的意见进行了深入的修改。
我们希望再次向您提交我们团队对于XXX方面的研究成果,期待能够在贵刊上发表我们的研究成果。
下面我将再次就我们的研究成果向您进行较为详细的介绍。
[转载]COVER LETTER(投稿信)实用指南(经验经历分享)(转载零点花园)如何询问稿件及编辑答复!Dear Editor,I'm not sure if it is the right time to contact you again to inquire about the status of my submittedmanuscript(ref:****) although nearly one month have passed since I contacted you last time. Iwould be greatly appreciate ifyou could spend some of your time check the status for me.Best regards***老外的答复:Dear ***,Thank you for your e-mail. We would like to sincerely apologise for the long delay in reviewingyour article. Your article was sent to many different referees, most of whom felt that they wereeither unqualified or their time was too restricted to review the paper. We understand that youmust feel frustrated, and we are sorry for this. Please understand that we rely entirely on thereferee’s to return articles to us speedily. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. It would bemuch appreciated if you could suggest an alternative referee for your article, a person who may beable to review the article in a more appropriate time frame. Please forward this person's contactdetails (e-mail address) to us as soon as possible. We will do our very best to speed up the process.We apologize for any inconvenience that you experienced due to this delay, and we appreciateyour understanding and tried patience in this regard.邀请函上没有老外签名,无法签证背景介绍:老外的签名跟我们的盖章查不多,没有签名的东西是不正式的,我去参加某次国际会议,签证的时候才发现,粗心的老外给我的邀请函没有他的签名,我只好email 给她询问,并要求马上传真给我。
CoverLetter写法及注意事项Cover Letter写法及注意事项 CV是找⼯作的时候⼗分重要的⼀种信件,那么,Cover Letter要怎么写呢?需要注意什么呢?下⾯是⼩编收集整理的Cover Letter写法及注意事项,欢迎阅读。
1、写,还是不写 要考虑这个问题,我们需要弄清的是Cover Letter的⽤处。
Cover Letter,顾名思义,是附在CV前作为“封⾯”的,所以它更像是⼀个简介,⽽不是CV的附加内容。
如果说CV是求职者针对⾃⼰能⼒和经历总结出的⼀个⾻架,那么Cover Letter就是让这个⾻架更加有⾎有⾁。
雇主到底想不想看到Cover Letter呢?有的招聘⼴告会说明需要Cover Letter,否则就要看你的Cover Letter写得如何了。
⼀项调查显⽰: 42.9%的雇主想要看到申请者的Cover Letter 29.8%的雇主觉得Cover Letter并没有什么卵⽤(“让我看这东西我是拒绝的!”) 27.4%的雇主则表⽰⽆所谓 因此,要写Cover Letter就要写好,否则不如不要。
那么怎么才算写得好的Cover Letter呢? 2、写什么,怎么写? 在考虑⼀篇优秀的Cover Letter 怎么写这个问题之前,不妨思考⼀下,既然已经有CV了,那雇主看你的Cover Letter,到底看的是什么?另⼀项调查提到了这个结果: 33% - 公司对这个职位提出的能⼒要求,你符合哪些? 26% - 你的⾏⽂能⼒和表达能⼒是否清晰简洁 20% - 对CV中某些重点的提炼和解释 19% - 你的个⼈价值→为什么要雇佣你? 18% - 拼写和语法 17% - 个⼈亮点 12% - 概括能⼒ 10% - 即使你给了,我也不看Cover Letter 因此,⼤家可以看出来了,Cover Letter最⼤的作⽤应该是两个,⼀是展现你的⽂章表达、概括总结能⼒,⼆是针对性地说明你适合这项⼯作的能⼒和理由。
Cover Letter的内容必须能够激励编辑继续去读你的文章全文。
因此,你工作中的重要内容(例如创新性和在领域内的意义等)需要在Cover Letter中被呈现出来。
一般情况下,Cover Letter的长度在五段以内。
太长的话会让编辑感觉作者心虚,太短的话不足以充分表达文章所做工作的重点内容。
我们现在根据Cover Letter的写作顺序来介绍相关要点。
首先,向编辑简要介绍一下论文的内容以及参与此项研究工作的作者名单。
在这里不需要太详细,即使是工作中包含了一些复杂的实验部分。
其次,重点解释为什么该研究是有创新性的而且会受大家感兴趣。
在这里,你可以介绍有哪些创新性的技术被用到、你的实验样本数量足够多、研究成果将对这个领域有较大影响等。
一些临床国际期刊还要求你介绍这项工作会对将来的实际治疗应用有什么意义。
需要注意的是写作时包含要点而不用仔细解释。
同时,尽量让编辑看到你的工作是和所投期刊非常相关的。
最好是你的工作也刚好验证了别的研究团队在这个期刊以前发表的成果,或者与他们结果相反,而你也用很好的证明。
再次,你可以介绍你和你的研究团队:主要研究人员,实验室的研究方向,以及与这篇文章的关系。
同样,你可以解释为什么要选择这个期刊来投稿。
如果此项工作有与其他实验室合作完成,你也可以在这里介绍相关合作团队。
最后,声明你的文章没有任何利益方面的冲突(查询各期刊在利益冲突政策方面的描述,因为每个期刊有不同的相关规定)。
同时,你需要表明这项研究没有发表过,而且也没同时在别的期刊投稿。
当然,整篇Cover Letter的写作要没有语法和拼写错误,所以你要再三检查。
如果你的母语不是英语,可以让朋友或专业编辑服务公司帮忙较对和润色。
总之,始终带着积极的态度来完成一篇能说服编辑去仔细进行审阅你的论文全文的Cover Letter。
Dear Editors (or his/her first name if available),We would like to submit our (revised) manuscriptTitlebyAuthor listfor publication in the Journal-Name as a(an) article/ letter/ comment/ erratum/ ... .Other information if you want (e.g. for a special issue, not recommended reviewers and reasons, and so on).Sincerely yours,The corresponding author‟s nameAUTHOR'S PHONE NUMBER: 123-456-7890AUTHOR'S FAX NUMBER: 123-456-7890AUTHOR'S EMAIL: ***********************.eduAUTHOR'S POSTAL ADDRESS:Institute, Department, University, City, State, Country, Zip-Code投稿信举例:Dear Dr.:Enclosed are three copies of a manuscript by Rose N .Dipaola,Donna A.Gallo,and Tom N.Roberts titled“Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Long-Term Transfusion Patients”.It is submitted to be considered for publication as a“Original Article" in your journal.This paper is~•Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal.We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal because the study it reports stated the HCV infection rate among long-term transfusion patients is higher than that of the general population and of short-term transfusion patients.Correspondence and phone calls about the paper should be directed to Rose N.Dipaola at the following address,phone and fax number,and e-mail address:Rose N .Dipaola,MDInstitute of Internal MedicineCleveland Clinic Foundation9500 Euclid Ave.Cleveland,OH44195,USATel:1-216-444-5360Fax:1-216-444-9580E-mail:dipao@cesmtp .ccf. OrgThanks very much for your attention to our paper.Sincerely yours,Rose N.Dipaola给个短的Dear Professor ×××:One of my paper, which has a title of “××××”, is hoped to be published in your journal . Please take it into your consideration for publication.If you need any more information concerning the manuscript please write to me. I am looking forward to hearing from you.Best regards××××英文投稿的模版信3Dear Sir,We are submitting a manuscript entitled “XXXXX” for your kind consideration forpublication in XXXX.In this manuscript, we report a novel approach ..............We would be grateful if the manuscript could be reviewed and considered for publication in this journal.Sincerely yours,A cover letter is the one you write to the editorial board of the journals when you submit your manuscript.One cover letter generally should include the following parts:(1)The correspondence information of the correspondent;(2)The title of the manuscript, the numbers of tables, figures, charts, plates and so on;(3)The statement that this manuscript has never been partly or wholely published in or submitted to any other journals;(4)The statement that all authors in the manuscript have agreed to submit it to this journal and it's better to have each one's signature;(5)The statement that the research in the manuscript has been conducted under the guidance of international ethical standards if the research uses animals as experimental materials;(7)Suggested reviewers you think that are appropriate for this manuscript;(8)The statement on the inappropriate reviewers for this manuscript, and it's better to state the reasons in concise words;(9)Some journals require the authors to briefly introduce his research purposes, methods and results.The following is one cover letter I wrote with a plate given by the two professors.Zhang San, Ph DEnvironment and Architecture School,Sichuan UniversityMozhiqiao, Ring One Road, Chengdu, SichuanThe People‟s Republic of ChinaZip code: 610088E-mail:*************.cnDear Dr. RichardI enclose a manuscript entitled The Preparation of the Monokaryon Protoplast and its Regeneration in Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus), which I submit for possible publication in the Jounal of Biosource Technology. All of the authors agree to the submission of this paper.The text includes 20 pages, 3 tables, and 2 figures prepared using Microsoft Word Processing 2003 according to the journal's Instructions to Authors. We have provided all required supporting documentation.We respectfully submit that the following individuals would be suitable peer reviewers based on their expertise in the field:Li Y u, Microbiological Research Institute, Chinese Acadmey of Agricutlureal Sciences. E-mail: **************Zhang Jun, Resources and Environmental Protection School, Sichuan Agricultural University. E-mail:*****************Chen Wei, SchoolofHorticulture,ChinaAgriculturalUniversity.E-mail:****************In recent years, our research group has had some conflicts with Li Haha and Wang Chuachua in Sichuan Institute of Microbiology in project application. We request that these individuals not be consulted.We thank you for considering this work and look forward to your response. Please direct all correspondenceaboutthismanuscripttome(orDr.ZhangSan,e-amil:*****************).SincerelyZhang Shane-mail:******************.cnThe following are all the authors in this paper and their signature.Zhang San XXXLi Si XXXWang Wu XXXY ang Y u XXXMore examples about how to write a cover letter!COVER LETTER(投稿信)实用指南来源于:/blog/user_content.aspx?id=90791、什么是cover letter?指的是投稿信2、cover letter的内容主要包括那些?应该简述所投稿件的核心内容、主要发现和意义,拟投期刊,对稿件处理有无特殊要求等(如“not to review” list)。
Cover Letter是一篇文章的外衣,对国外投稿能否成功很关键,一般投稿时的Cover Letter并不是很重要,只要说明你稿件的研究方向及创新点,并声明没有在其他期刊发表过.最难写的就是Revised Manuscript中的Cover Letter,这将关系到是否录用你的稿件,或要进一步审稿.国外专家讲求的是精益求精,老外们对文章都很严谨的,一个单词哪怕是一个介词的使用都是很有考究的,因此会提出很多似乎对文章无关紧要的修改意见,但是这你要给予充分的重视.通过国外发表几篇文章后,开始一直失败,但是我没有放弃,通过总结现在将一些经验和大家分享,以免大家走很多不必要的弯路.为了更好理解,我用我发的一篇文章作为例子来说明:这里是期刊审稿人的修改意见:Dear *****,The review of your manuscript, Thermal Decomposition and Kinetics Studies on 1, 4-dinitropiperazine (DNP), submitted to Journal of Hazardous Materials has been completed. The reviewers recommend the need for minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript according to the reviewers' comments attached, and re-submit to me your revised version of the manuscript including an itemized response to each reviewer's comments.Please submit your revised submission before Jul 11, 2007. I will then begin the re-review process.Please note that revised manuscripts will be sent for review because revising a manuscript does not automatically mean it will be accepted for publication.For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.Please ensure that the article conforms to the format of the Journal. In particular make sure that all the articles in your references have titles included. The Journal Guide for Authors is available on the Journal homepage/locate/hazmatWhen submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.Once again, thank you for your interest in Journal of Hazardous Materials.Yours sincerely,Merv Fingas, PhDEditorJournal of Hazardous MaterialsReviewers' comments:Reviewer #1: The paper reports on the thermal decomposition and kinetics of DNP.It is a welcome addition to the literature and appectable for publication after some revision:(i) Please provide large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP.(ii) Please assign ALL IR bands of Fig. 5Reviewer #2: authors have carried out work on the thermal analysis of the dinitropiperazine. The new information reported in the paper is scanty. The large amount of data has been already reported by the several researchers on the thermal analysis of dinitropiperazine (See the reference section of the paper and also reviewer has done the scopus search). The only new information reported in this paper is of theT-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to the existing scientific data base. There is not much novelty in the reported work.The Table 1 and figure 1 need to be deleted from the paper since it is already well reported in the literature.Table 2 and figure 3 gives the same information. Authors are requested to delete Table 2 and the same information may be explained in the results and discussion part of the paper.May i also kindly request authors to update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper using Chemical abstracts on disk (CA on CD) data base.The quality and clarity of the figures in the paper need to be improved.English need to be improved.The paper is recommended for short communication after the minor revision.Reviewer #3: The paper is okay in terms of contents.However,since it has been written bya Chinese, the english is very poor and as such requires a lot of corrections and editing by your team.The authors have used ozawa and Kissenger methods to find out activation energy.However,they have given data for activation energy by ozawa methodonly under 3.4 thermal decomposition kinetics).The data for Eo by Kissenger methods shouldalso be included in the paper.Also,captions of Figs 1,3 &5 are missing.Reviewer #4: This paper is promising but could be improved by better kinetic analysis.1. Kissinger's method is OK as a first approximation, but Friedman's method is the best isoconversional method. Even Ozawa has abandoned his method in favor of Friedman's.2. The method of comparing a large number of kinetic models against data at a single heating rate (page 5) is invalid, discredited, and should not be published. This issue has been discussed in several papers by Vyzovkin and in a international kinetic study published by Brown et al, Thermochemica Acta 355, 125-143, 2000, and following papers. Consequently, there is no real evidence presented that the equation is first-order. In fact, from my studies of energetic materials, including RDX and HMX, I would have thought that nucleation-growth kinetics would be most appropriate. However, I would have to do a more rigorous kinetic analysis of the data to know for sure.3. The best way to judge a kinetic model is how it compares with data at multiple heating rates (using a single set of parameters). Such a comparison is not present in this paper, so it is difficult to judge the validity of the kinetic parameters.4. The author's discussion of HMX kinetics is good in some respects but out of date in others. More recent papers by multiple institutions place the activation energy for HMX closer to 150 kJ/mol. A commonly cited paper on this is by Wight and Vyazovkin, Ann Rev Phys Chem 48, 119, 1997. A more recent but harder paper to get is by Burnham and Weese in the proceedings of the 2005 ICT conference. Henson has published a correlation in the detonation symposium showing that explosion times scale with an activation energy of about 150 kJ/mol. Active workers in energetic materials should have access to these materials.看完了这个,是不是会觉得很头疼,是的老外就是这么认真.要求很具体仔细,审稿细致深入.下面就是看你怎么样回复这篇审稿意见了.我回复后的第三天就收到论文录用通知,估计他们没有再次送给审稿专家重审.因为我的Cover Letter他很满意,我是这样写的:Dear ***,My manuscript, *********************(论文题目), was revised according to the reviewers' comments, and the itemized respons e to each reviewer’s comments is attached. Many thanks for your suggestion. I am so sorry to bring you so much trouble because of our careless. Correspondence and phone calls about this paper should be directed to ****(作者)at the following address,phone and e-mail:Address: *********Tel.: ********Fax:*******E-mail: **********Thanks very much again for your attention to our paper.Once again, thank you for your help to our paper processing.Yours sincerely,******For your guidance, itemized response to each reviewer’s comments is appended below.♥ Dear reviewer #1:(i) Suhithi M. Peiris, Richard, etc. (J. Phys. Chem. A, 104 (39), 8898 -8907, 2000.10.1021) had already reported large basis-set DFT calculations to support the assignment of the IR bands of DNP.(ii) We assigned all IR bands of Fig.5 (now change to fig.8).(iii) Because of the IR study had been reported, the IR spectra (fig.1) was deleted form the paper. Anyway, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.♥ Dear reviewer #2:(i) G. V. Sitonina, etc. (Russian Chemical Bulletin, V ol.28, 284-288) A study has been made of the kinetics of thermal decomposition of dinitropiperazine, in melts and in solution. As you said, the only new information reported in this paper is of the T-Jump IR studies and DSC studies under different pressures, which may adds on to the existing scientific data base. Nevertheless, the kinetics study in our paper is a supplement which is with multi-heating rate method.(ii) The Table 1 and figure 1 was deleted from the paper and the correlative references were put forward.(iii) Table 2 was deleted and the same information was explained in the results and discussion part of the paper.(iv) We had update the literature survey till date on DNP in the introduction part of the paper and enriched the introduction of the paper.(v) The figures were drawn again and the quality and clarity of them were improved. (vi) English expression was improved a little and it’s my great honor to ask your help on the language aspect.♥ Dear reviewer #3:(i) As a Chinese, our English is very poor and a few of corrections and editing had done by our team.(ii) Now we only used Ozawa method to find out activation energy and you can check it in our paper again. According to reviewer #4, Kissinger method is invalid, discredited, and should not be published.(iii) Figures and captions of them are changed.(iv) At last, thank you for your arduous work and instructive advice.♥ Dear reviewer #4:i. This paper was improved by a better kinetic analysis. The kinetic parameters were established by Ozawa's isoconversional method because there is no Friedman's calculation program in our institute.ii. As you just said, the method of comparing a large number of kinetic models againstdata at a single heating rate is invalid. After the kinetic study by isoconversional method with data at multiple heating rates, we found that nucleation-growth kinetics is more appropriate. You are seasoned in these aspects and it’s my great honor to ask your advice on these sorts of aspects.iii. In order to judge a kinetic model, we did a comparison a single heating rate method with multi-heating method, and at last the kinetic parameters were judged. iv. You are right; the discussion of HMX kinetics is really out of date. The activation energy for HMX is closer to 150 kJ/mol. We had done the improvements in our paper. v. From your comments, it’s obvious that you are an expert in thermo analysi s, and there is lots of shortage in our study which need your instruction. At last, I want to thank you sincerely for your suggestions and I feel so sorry that so much of your precious time was wasted on our paper revision.这样的回复看似很复杂,其实这很有必要,你的回答一定要有条理并且要有针对性,针对每一个专家的意见分别做出自己的回应,其实这篇信也叫Response Letter. 这样一来,老外看出了你的一丝不苟,即使还有一些需要修正的小错误,他们也就不在乎了,自己帮你修正了.其实我们所处的专业不同,期刊的要求不同,专家的性格也不一样.但是总的来说就是四个字"一丝不苟",一定要认真对待修改意见.一般论文投到国外,如果满足期刊内容要求的前提下,一般会给你一个修改意见,不会直接拒绝.即使拒绝也是在第一次修改不满足要求的情况下拒绝的.他们想的是你改都改不好,还有什么话说. 最后,我希望大家多多发表高质量的科技论文,多到国外投稿,这样不是为了多几篇SCI,是多增加国际交流,给自身的发展创造条件.特别是对于想出国深造的研究学者们.谨以此和大家共勉!本文多有论述不当之处,望大家批评指正!谢谢!。