Gravitational collapse on the brane a no-go theorem
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:123.98 KB
- 文档页数:4
宇宙科学潮汐锁定的英语范文Title: The Intriguing Phenomenon of Tidal Locking in the Cosmos.Tidal locking, a fascinating astrophysical process, occurs when one celestial body in a binary system synchronizes its rotation rate with the orbital motion of its companion. This alignment results in a state where the same face of the tidally locked body always faces its partner, creating a unique and often breathtaking view of the cosmos. In this article, we delve into the science behind tidal locking, its implications for understanding our universe, and the remarkable examples we have observed throughout the cosmos.The Basics of Tidal Locking.Tidal locking, also known as synchronous rotation, occurs when the gravitational pull of one celestial body on another is strong enough to affect the rotation of thelatter. Over time, this interaction causes the rotationrate of the smaller body to slow down until it matches the orbital period of the larger body. Once this alignment is achieved, the smaller body effectively "locks" into place, with the same side always facing its companion.The mechanism behind this phenomenon can be traced to the uneven distribution of mass within the binary system.As the larger body orbits the smaller one, it creates atidal force that tugs on the smaller body's surface. This force is strongest on the side closest to the larger body, causing it to bulge slightly. Over time, the continuouspull of the larger body's gravity on this bulge slows down the rotation of the smaller body until it matches theorbital period.Implications for Understanding the Universe.Tidal locking provides valuable insights into the dynamics of binary systems and the evolution of celestial bodies. By studying these systems, astronomers can gain insights into the formation and evolution of planets, moons,and stars. For instance, tidal locking may have played a crucial role in the formation of the moon's characteristic features, such as its flat face always facing the earth.Moreover, tidal locking can also affect the atmospheres and geologies of tidally locked bodies. The constant exposure of one side to the radiation and gases of its companion can lead to unique atmospheric and geological features. This interaction can even influence the potential for life to exist on these bodies, as the constant exposure of one side to sunlight can create a habitable environment.Remarkable Examples of Tidal Locking.One of the most striking examples of tidal locking in our solar system is the moon. As the moon orbits the earth, it rotates on its axis once for every orbit, ensuring that we always see the same face of the moon. This alignment is thought to have occurred early in the moon's history, when its rotation rate was affected by the strong gravitational pull of the earth.Outside our solar system, tidal locking is even more common. Many moons of gas giants in our galaxy, such as those of Jupiter and Saturn, are tidally locked to their parent planets. This alignment creates a stunning view when observed through telescopes, with one side of the moon always illuminated, while the other remains in perpetual darkness.In addition to moons, some binary star systems also exhibit tidal locking. These systems, known as eclipsing binaries, consist of two stars orbiting each other soclosely that their gravitational pull affects theirrotation rates. As a result, the stars are locked into a synchronous rotation, with one star always facing the other.Conclusion.Tidal locking is a fascinating astrophysical phenomenon that occurs when the gravitational pull of one celestial body affects the rotation rate of its companion. This alignment creates a unique and often breathtaking view ofthe cosmos, providing valuable insights into the dynamicsof binary systems and the evolution of celestial bodies. As we continue to explore the universe, tidal locking remains an important tool for understanding the intricate dance of gravity and motion that shapes our vast and wondrous cosmos.。
a rXiv:h ep-th/95112v14J an1995IC/94/401International Atomic Energy Agency and United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS Gravitational Lorentz anomaly from the overlap formula in 2-dimensions S.Randjbar-Daemi and J.StrathdeeInternational Centre for Theoretical PhysicsDecember 1994Gravitational Lorentz anomalyfrom the overlap formula in2-dimensionsS.Randjbar-DaemiInternational Centre for Theoretical Physics,Trieste34100,ItalyandJ.StrathdeeInternational Centre for Theoretical Physics,Trieste34100,ItalyDecember1994AbstractIn this letter we show that the overlap formulation of chiral gauge theories cor-rectly reproduces the gravitational Lorentz anomaly in2-dimensions.This formu-lation has been recently suggested as a solution to the fermion doubling problem on the lattice.The well known response to general coordinate transformations of the effective action of Weyl fermions coupled to gravity in2-dimensions can also be recovered.The formulation of lattice chiral gauge theories has been an outstanding problem for many years[1].In a recent paper a new formulation of this problem has been suggested[2]. One of the necessary steps in checking the viability of this suggestion is to show that it correctly reproduces the chiral anomalies in the continuum limit.For the case of a U(1) gauge theory in2-dimensions this was done in[3],and its generalization to non-abelian chiral anomalies in4-dimensions is contained in[4].In this letter we would like to use the notation and formalism developed in[4]to examine the anomalous coupling of Weyl fermions to a background gravitationalfield in2dimensions.It will be shown that the overlap formalism proposed in[2]correctly reproduces the chiral anomaly in this system.Our starting point will be the Hamiltonian of a2-component”massive”fermion cou-pled to a gravitationalfield eµa in2+1dimensionsH= d2xψ†(x)σ3(σa eµa∇µ+Λ)ψ(x)(1)∂µln e,with whereσa,a=1,2andσ3are the Pauli spin matrices and∇µ=∂µ−i2ωµbeing the spin connection derived from the zweibein eµa and e−1=deteµa.All thefields in(1)depend only on the2-dimensional coordinates.The Hamiltonian(1)is invariant under general coordinate transformations xµ→fµ(x1,x2) provided the2-component spinorfieldψtransforms as a scalar density of weight1θ(x)σ3ψ(x).2It was shown in[4]that in the limit of|Λ|→∞the Hamiltonians of the type(1) can be used to recover the Green’s functions of a massless chiral gauge theory.It is well known that the gravitational coupling of such fermions is anomalous[5].Here we would like to rederive this anomaly in the local frame rotations as|Λ|→∞.The overlap formulation of[2]defines the effective actionΓ[e]byΓ[e]=−ln<e;+|e;−>where|e;+>and|e;−>are the Dirac ground states of the two Hamiltonians H(+Λ) and H(−Λ),respectively.To study the behaviour ofΓ[e]under local frame rotations wemust test the response of the two ground states with respect to such transformations. Acting on the Schr¨o dinger picturefields these transformations are realized by unitary operators U(θ),U(θ)−1ψ(x)U(θ)=e i2σ3θ(x)ψ(x)[1−12ωµ+12σ3θ(x)ψ(x)|n>1where the sums are restricted to 2-particle intermediate states,n |n ><n |=1Ω k (b ±u ±(k )+d †±v ±(k ))eikx where Ωis the volume of a 2-box and u ’s and v ’s are the positive and the negative energy eigenvectors of H 0±(k )=σ3(iσµk µ±|Λ|),H 0±(k )u ±(k )=ω(k )u ±(k ),H 0±(k )v ±(k )=−ω(k )v ±(k )where ω(k )=(k 2+Λ2)1δθ(x )=iω(k 1)+ω(k 2)T rσ3U (k 1)σ3σµ{˜ω(k 1−k 2)σ3+(k 1−k 2)µ˜h (k 1−k 2)−2k 2ν˜h νµ((k 1−k 2)}V (k 2) where U (k )=ω(k )+σ3(iσµk µ+Λ)δθ(x )=Λ d 2p2(π)2k µk ν2)ω(k −p2)+ω(k −p|Λ|and obtainF µν(p )=|Λ|2(π)2q µq ν8p 28(q.p )2where all the terms not indicated explicitly are given by convergent integrals and vanish as|Λ|→∞.The leading term inside the bracket on the right-hand side makes a divergent contribution which must be subtracted in the usual way by a suitable counterterm.It should be noted that this contribution is independent of p and therefore will not contribute to the terms involving the derivatives of hµν.Those of the convergent integrals which contribute in the limit ofΛ→∞produceFµν(p)=1δθ(x)=Λ48π(∂2δµν−∂µ∂ν)hνµ(x)(7)To see that this is the standard result we only need to make use of the geometric relations ωµ=−1e∂βe aαand∂µων−∂νωµ=εµνRδθ(x)=Λ96πR(8)This agrees with the well known result for the Lorentz anomaly[6].In a similar way we can study the response of the overlap to general coordinate transformations of2-dimensional manifold and recover the result of[6]for the anomalous divergence of the energy momentum tensor.References[1]L.H.Karsten,Phys.Lett.104B,315(1981);L.H.Karsten and J.Smit,Nucl.Phys B183,103(1981);H.B.Nielsen and M.Ninomya,Nucl.Phys B185,20(1981);Nucl.Phys B193,173(1981);Phys.Lett.105B,219(1981)[2]R.Narayanan and H.Neuberger,“A construction of lattice chiral gauge theories”,ISSNS-HEP-94/99,RU-94-93[3]R.Narayanan and H.Neuberger,Nucl.Phys B412,574(1994)[4]S.Randjbar-Daemi and J.Strathdee,“On the overlap formulation of chiral gaugetheory”,ICTP preprint IC/94/396,hep-th9412165;S.Randjbar-Daemi and J.Strathdee,paper in preparation[5]L.Alvarez-Gaum´e and E.Witten,Nucl.Phys B234,269(1983);W.Bardeen and B.Zumino,Nucl.Phys B244,421(1984)[6]H.Leutwyler,Phys.Lett.153B,65(1985)。
重力场现象英语Dive into the enigmatic realm of gravity, a force so fundamental yet so mysterious, that it shapes the very fabric of our universe. From the majestic dance of celestial bodies to the humble apple falling to the ground, gravity is the silent orchestrator of our physical world. It's a force that has captivated the minds of scientists for centuries, from Newton's apple to Einstein's theory of general relativity, and continues to baffle and inspire us.Gravity, the invisible hand that pulls everything with mass towards each other, is a phenomenon that is as omnipresent as it is elusive. It's the reason why we stay grounded on Earth and why the Earth orbits the Sun. It's the force that holds galaxies together, yet it's so weak compared to the other fundamental forces that it can be easily overcome by other interactions at the atomic level.The gravity field, as it's known in scientific terms, is not uniform across the universe. It varies in strength depending on the mass of the objects involved and the distance between them. This variation is what gives rise to the complex dynamics of planetary motion, the formation of black holes, and the bending of light around massive objects.But gravity is not just a cosmic force; it's deeply intertwined with the structure of spacetime itself. According to Einstein, gravity is not an interaction between masses buta curvature of spacetime caused by mass. This curvature tells matter how to move, and matter tells spacetime how to curve. It's a beautiful, interwoven relationship that defies our everyday intuition.In our quest to understand gravity, we've discovered that it is the key to unlocking the mysteries of the cosmos. It dictates the life cycle of stars, the expansion of the universe, and the formation of cosmic structures. Yet, despite its significance, gravity remains the least understood of all fundamental forces, with many questionsstill unanswered, such as the nature of dark matter and dark energy, which seem to influence the gravitational field in ways we are only beginning to comprehend.The gravity field is a testament to the elegance and complexity of the universe. It's a force that, while seemingly simple in its action, is intricate in its implications. As we continue to explore the cosmos and delve deeper into the heart of gravity, we may yet uncover the secrets that will revolutionize our understanding of the universe and our place within it.。
a rXiv:h ep-th/032v29M ar2IFT-UAM/CSIC-00-11hep-th/0003002February 1,2008Brane World with Bulk Horizons C´e sar G´o mez,1Bert Janssen 2and Pedro J.Silva 3Instituto de F´ısica Te´o rica,C-XVI,Departamento de F´ısica Te´o rica,C-XI,Universidad Aut´o noma de Madrid E-28006Madrid,Spain ABSTRACT A brane world in the presence of a bulk black hole is constructed.The brane tension is fine tuned in terms of the black hole mass and cosmological constant.Gravitational perturbations localized on the brane world are discussed.1.IntroductionA brane world with induced four dimensional gravity wasfirst introduced in[1,2]on the basis of a AdS5bulk geometry.In this scheme normalizable gravitational zero modes are allowed due to the ultraviolet cutoffinduced by the brane wall.The dilatonfield is constant and the holographic degrees of freedom on the wall define a conformalfield theory coupled to gravity[3].In a series of recent papers[4,5,6,7,8]this framework was extended to the non conformal case i.e to dilatonic domain walls.In these cases, both with vanishing and non vanishing cosmological constant,we observe the phenomena of induced four dimensional gravity,however a naked curvature singularity is induced by the non constant dilaton in the bulk at afinite proper distance from the brane wall.The physics interpretation of such a singularity from the four dimensional point of view is still an open problem.In this letter we will look for a Randall-Sundrum scenario but this time in the bulk geometry of a real black hole with the singularity inside a trapped surface.A similar analysis was with a non static Ansatz wasfirst by[9,10]in the framework of cosmological models.We will work out the static case in a Schwarzschild-AdS bulk metric.This will correspond to a brane world in a thermal bath at the Hawking temperature.Thefirst question we will address would be thefine tuning relations between the brane wall tension and the parametersΛand M characterizing the Schwarzschild-AdS metric.Thesefine tuning relations would be obtained by solving the corresponding jump equations once we introduce the wall as an ultraviolet cutoffanalogously to the AdS case.Since our space is asymptotically AdS this cutoffcould be enough to induce four dimensional gravity on the wall in terms of normalizable graviton zero modes.2.Construction of the solutionOur starting point is the followingfive-dimensional action of gravity in the presence of a cosmological constantΛwith a domain wall source term given by:S=1|g| R−Λ + d4xr2)dt2−1r2)dr2−r2dΩ23.(2)where R=12Λ−1and M is basically the black hole mass.In order to apply the Randall-Sundrum program to this type of metrics,we consider a new set of coordinates defined by,dz=11+R−2r2−2Mtherefore ending up in a holographic-like frameds 2=A 2(z )dt 2+B 2(z )d Ω23−dz 2,(4)where A (z )and B (z )are function of the holografic coordinate z ,implicitly given byA (r )= r 2,B (r )=r ,(5)with r a function of z ,defined by the relation (3).UsingthisAnsatz(4)in the correspond-ing equations of motion of (1),we get the following system of equations:B −2Λ−B −2(B ′)2−A −1A ′B −1B ′=0,−B −2+B −1B ′′+B −2(B ′)2+Λ+12B 2Λ+A −1B 2A ′′+2BB ′′+(B ′)2+2A −1A ′BB ′+12log 2R −1rA +2R −2r 2+11+8MR −2 (7)where ¯z =z 0−z ,which translates into:d |¯z |=−11+R −2r 2−2M κr (0) r (0)2(9)If the black hole horizon is smaller than the AdS radius M <R 2,we could choose to do the cutoffat r (¯z =0)=R and the above formula reduces to:V 0=62R 2−2M =−1−Λ12M Λ)(10)3singularity horizon braneFigure1:Graviton profile on the Schwarzschild-AdS space-time.For large r the graviton behaves like in ordinary AdS space and is not normalizable.A cutoffin form of a brane is needed at r=r0.For small values of r,the graviton also diverges,but is hidden behind a horizon.Note that in the limit M→0,we recover the Randall-Sundrum relation between V0and Λ[1,2]4.In summary what we have done is basically to consider Schwarzschild-AdS space time with a brane located at a given distance r(0)from the event horizon.Then replace the part of the space time outside the brane(r>r(0))with a copy of the inner part,ending up with afinite range for the radial variable.It is important to note that this space time comes with two space-like singularities hidden inside the event parison with the dilatonic solution found on previous work[7],shows that the role of the singularity on those solutions is replaced by the event horizon in this new model.Nevertheless we also have a non isotropic worldbrane,the time direction scales differently than the space directions under radialflow.3.Gravitational perturbationsTo calculate the behavior of the graviton we add smallfluctuations hµνto the above background,choosing the following gauge:ˆgµν=gµν+hαβδαµδβν,(11) whereα,βrun over the coordinates t and the angular coordinates x m.Furthermore wer2−2M.4branesingularity horizon horizon singularityFigure2:The profile of normalized graviton after the cut off.The thrown away part is replaced by a copy of the space with z<z0.The graviton is localized around the brane.The space-time ends in two singularities which do not harm the causal structure of the brane world,since they are hidden by event horizons.have h=gµνhµν=A−2h tt+B−2¯h and∇h=0,¯∇m h mµ=0,where¯∇m stands for the covariant derivative of the angular coordinates.Notice that this is not the usual de Donder gauge since the perturbation is not traceless.Nevertheless if we are interested in a real graviton with two helicity states more constraints should be added.The equation of motion,on this gauge for thefluctuation hµνis:∇2hµν−2∇ρ∇(µhν)ρ+12Λgµνh=0,(12) Introducing the background(4),the components{tt}and{zz}of the above equation, reduce to:A−3A′∂z h tt−2A−4(A′)2h tt+B−3B′∂z¯h−2B−4(B′)2¯h=0∂2z h tt+A−2∂2t h tt−B−2¯∇2h tt3(B−1B′−A−1A′)∂z h tt+(4A−2(A′)2−12A2h=0(13) To describe four-dimensional zero modes,we consider eigenfunction of the world brane variables xα,satisfyingA−2∂2t h tt−B−2¯∇2h tt=0.(14) Under these conditions wefind a very simple solution:h tt=A2,¯h=B2(15)5In principle we could turn on more degrees of freedom,to determine a more realistic graviton,nevertheless this mode shows the correct behavior to illustrate the location of the perturbation,and its normalizability.Note that the specific form of our perturbation reproduces the desired localization on the brane(seefig.1,2)as well as the normalizability condition.To end this letter we would like to relate the world brane Newton constant with thefive dimensional Newton constant.To proceed on this direction we note that a straightforward definition is not possible since the obvious Kaluza-Klein reduction gives no terms in the effective action that could be related to the Einstein term.This is a consequence of the anisotropy of the world brane.Fortunately far from the event horizon this space time looks like AdS,therefore our brane becomes isotropic with warp factor A2.Then we can proceed as usual to define the Newton constant.The Newton constant,far from the horizon is essentially AdS in static coordinates plus a correction coming from the black hole:=M35 z00dz A2(r(¯z))=r0 1+r20r20 (16) M24For r0=R and M≪R1M24=M35 3Λ 1−[7]C.G´o mez,B.Janssen,P.Silva,Dilatonic Randall-Sundrum Theory and renormaliza-tion group,hep-th/0002042[8]S.Kachru,M.Schulz,E.Silverstein,Bounds on curved domain walls in5d gravity,hep-th/0002121[9]P.Kraus,JHEP9912(1999)011,hep-th/9910149[10]A.Kehagias,E.Kiritsis,JHEP9911(1999)022,hep-th/9910174[11]S.Hawking,D.Page,Commun.Math.Phys.87(1983)5777。
牛顿万有引力定律的英语In the realm of physics, Sir Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation stands as a cornerstone of understanding the forces that govern celestial bodies. It elegantly explains how every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force that is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.This fundamental principle, first articulated in the late 17th century, has withstood the test of time, shaping our comprehension of how planets orbit the sun, how moons orbit planets, and even how tides are influenced by the gravitational pull of the moon and the sun.Newton's law of universal gravitation is encapsulated in the equation \( F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2} \), where \( F \) is the force of attraction, \( G \) is the gravitational constant, \( m_1 \) and \( m_2 \) are the masses of the two objects, and \( r \) is the distance between their centers. It's a formula that has guided countless scientific endeavors and space missions.Despite its simplicity, the implications of this law are profound. It has been instrumental in the development of modern astronomy and has been a key factor in the design of spacecraft trajectories, ensuring that they can navigate the vast distances of space with precision.As we delve deeper into the cosmos, the law of universal gravitation remains a vital tool in our scientific arsenal. It is a testament to Newton's genius and the enduring legacy of his work, which continues to inspire new generations of scientists and thinkers to explore the mysteries of the universe.。
重力的束缚英语作文Title: The Constraints of Gravity。
Gravity, an omnipresent force that governs the motionsof celestial bodies, shapes the very fabric of our universe. From the graceful dance of planets around stars to the fall of an apple from a tree, its influence is undeniable. Inthis essay, we will delve into the constraints imposed by gravity and explore its profound impact on various aspectsof existence.First and foremost, gravity is a fundamental force that binds objects with mass together. According to Newton's law of universal gravitation, every particle of matter in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. This law encapsulates the essence of gravity's binding power, dictating the trajectories of celestial bodies and ensuring the stability of cosmicstructures.On a cosmic scale, gravity plays a pivotal role in shaping the dynamics of galaxies. Within these vast cosmic conglomerations, gravitational interactions between stars, gas, and dust govern their motions and configurations. The gravitational pull of massive galactic cores anchorsswirling spiral arms, sculpting majestic galactic spirals that adorn the cosmos. Moreover, gravitational lensing, an effect predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, serves as a cosmic magnifying glass, allowing astronomersto peer into the depths of space and unveil the secrets of distant galaxies.Closer to home, gravity exerts its influence on the celestial body we call home: Earth. The gravitational pullof our planet gives rise to phenomena such as tides, which result from the gravitational interaction between the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun. The Moon's gravitational tug causes the oceans to bulge outwards, leading to the rhythmic rise and fall of tides along coastlines worldwide. Furthermore, gravity dictates the trajectory of projectiles launchedinto the sky, shaping the science of ballistics andenabling feats of human ingenuity such as space exploration.Beyond the realm of astrophysics, gravity profoundly impacts life on Earth in myriad ways. The human body,finely tuned by evolution, has adapted to contend with the constant downward pull of gravity. From the skeletal system, which provides structural support against gravity's relentless force, to the cardiovascular system, which must work against gravity to circulate blood throughout the body, every aspect of human physiology bears the imprint ofgravity's influence. Moreover, the study of gravitational biology seeks to unravel the intricate interplay between gravity and living organisms, offering insights into phenomena ranging from plant growth to bone density loss in space.In the realm of technology, gravity poses both challenges and opportunities for innovation. The field of aerospace engineering grapples with the formidable task of overcoming Earth's gravity to propel spacecraft beyond the confines of our planet. Rocket propulsion systems, fueledby the combustion of propellants, generate enough thrust to counteract gravity and achieve escape velocity. Furthermore, concepts such as space elevators, which utilize tensile structures anchored to the Earth's surface and extendinginto space, offer tantalizing prospects for revolutionizing space travel by bypassing the need for traditional rocket propulsion.In conclusion, gravity serves as a ubiquitous forcethat shapes the cosmos and permeates every aspect of our existence. From the grandeur of galaxies to the intricacies of human physiology, its influence is profound and far-reaching. By understanding the constraints imposed by gravity, humanity can unlock new frontiers of knowledge and endeavor to transcend the gravitational shackles that bind us to our celestial home.。
牛顿的万有引力定律英语Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation is a fundamental principle in physics that describes the gravitational force between any two objects in the universe. This law was formulated by the renowned English mathematician and physicist Sir Isaac Newton in the late 17th century and has since become a cornerstone of classical mechanics.The origins of Newton's work on gravity can be traced back to his early life and education. Born in 1642 in Woolsthorpe Manor, Lincolnshire, England, Newton was a precocious child with a keen interest in the natural world. As a student at the University of Cambridge, he began to develop his theories on the motion of celestial bodies, building upon the work of earlier scientists such as Galileo Galilei and Johannes Kepler.One of the key events that led to the formulation of the Law of Universal Gravitation was the observation of the motion of the planets around the Sun. Kepler had already established three laws of planetary motion, but the underlying cause of these patterns remained a mystery. Newton, through his mathematical and scientificprowess, was able to unify these observations into a single, comprehensive theory.The essence of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation can be summarized as follows: every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This can be expressed mathematically as the equation:F =G * (m1 * m2) / r^2Where F is the force of gravity between the two objects, G is the gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between them.The implications of this law are far-reaching and have had a profound impact on our understanding of the universe. It explains the motion of the planets around the Sun, the behavior of tides, the acceleration due to gravity on Earth, and even the motion of galaxies and the large-scale structure of the cosmos.One of the most remarkable aspects of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation is its universality. It applies not only to the motion of celestial bodies but also to everyday objects on Earth. The sameforce that keeps the Moon in orbit around the Earth also governs the fall of an apple from a tree. This unification of the terrestrial and celestial realms was a groundbreaking achievement that revolutionized our understanding of the physical world.Newton's work on gravity also had a significant impact on the development of other areas of physics. His laws of motion, which describe the relationship between an object's mass, acceleration, and the forces acting upon it, are fundamental to the study of classical mechanics. These laws, combined with the Law of Universal Gravitation, form the foundation of Newtonian mechanics, which dominated the field of physics for over two centuries.Despite the enduring success of Newton's theory, it is important to note that it is not a complete or perfect description of gravity. In the early 20th century, Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity provided a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of gravitational phenomena, particularly in the realm of high-energy physics and the behavior of massive objects in the universe.General relativity, which describes gravity as a distortion of space-time rather than a force, has been extensively tested and verified through numerous experiments and observations. However, Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation remains a highly useful and accurate approximation for the vast majority of everyday situationsand is still widely used in various fields, such as astronomy, engineering, and space exploration.In conclusion, Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation is a landmark achievement in the history of science that has profoundly shaped our understanding of the physical world. Its simplicity, elegance, and universal applicability have made it a cornerstone of classical physics, and its influence continues to be felt in the ongoing pursuit of scientific knowledge and the exploration of the universe.。
a r X i v :g r -q c /0108013v 2 26 O c t 2001Gravitational collapse on the brane:a no-go theoremMarco Bruni,Cristiano Germani and Roy MaartensRelativity and Cosmology Group,School of Computer Science and Mathematics,Portsmouth University,Portsmouth PO12EG,Britain We investigate how braneworld gravity affects gravitational collapse and black hole formation by studying Oppenheimer-Snyder-like collapse on a Randall-Sundrum type brane.Without making any assumptions about the bulk,we prove a no-go theorem:the exterior spacetime on the brane cannot be static,which is in stark contrast with general relativity.We also consider the role of Kaluza-Klein energy density in collapse,using a toy model.The study of gravitational collapse in general relativ-ity (GR)is fundamental to understanding the behaviour of the theory at high energies.The Oppenheimer-Snyder (OS)model still provides a paradigmatic example that serves as a good qualitative guide to the general col-lapse problem in GR.It can be solved analytically,as it simply assumes a collapsing homogeneous dust cloud of finite mass and radius,described by a Robertson-Walker metric and surrounded by a vacuum exterior.In GR,this exterior is necessarily static and given by the Schwarzschild solution [1].In other theories of gravity that differ from GR at high energies,it is natural to look for similar examples.Braneworld scenarios of Randall-Sundrum type [2,3]lead to modified Einstein equations as the effective 4D field equations on the brane.In this Letter we analyze an OS-like collapse in this setting,in order to shed light on some fundamental differences be-tween collapse in GR and on the brane.In string theory and M-theory,which may provide a route towards quantum gravity,gravity is a truly higher-dimensional interaction,which becomes effectively 4D at low enough energies.Simple braneworld models inspired by these theories describe the observable universe as a 3-brane boundary of a 4D space (the bulk),with mat-ter fields confined on the brane.Gravity propagates in all 4spatial dimensions,but must be localized near the brane at low energies,in order to reproduce the success-ful predictions of GR.This is most obviously achieved via a small compact extra dimension,as in Kaluza-Klein (KK)theories,but the Randall-Sundrum model [2]lo-calizes gravity by the curvature of the bulk,even with a noncompact extra dimension.The bulk metric,which is anti-de Sitter (AdS 5),satisfies the 5-dimensional Einstein equations with negative cosmological constant.Their model,with vacuum Minkowski brane,has been general-ized to allow for arbitrary energy-momentum tensor on the brane,and the effective field equations on the brane are modified Einstein equations [3].Perturbative analysis of the gravitational field due to a compact source on the brane has been performed [2,4,5].In particular,in the weak-field limit there is a 5D correc-tion to the Newtonian potential on the brane which toleading order givesΦ=(GM/r ) 1+2ℓ2/3r 2,(1)where ℓis the curvature scale of AdS 5.Brane solu-tions of static black hole and stellar exteriors with 5-dimensional corrections to the Schwarzschild metric have been found [6,7],but the bulk metric for these solutions has not been found.The Schwarzschild black string bulk metric has a Schwarzschild black hole on the brane,but cannot describe the end state of gravitational collapse [8].Numerical integration into the bulk,starting from static black hole solutions on the brane,is plagued with diffi-culties [9].In summary,very little is known about as-trophysical black holes and stars on the brane,even in the static case.Even less is known about astrophysical gravitational collapse on the brane to a black hole.Braneworld gravitational collapse is complicated by a number of factors.The confinement of matter to the brane,while the gravitational field can access the extra dimension,is at the root of the difficulties relative to Einstein’s theory,and this is compounded by the grav-itational interaction between the brane and the bulk.Matching conditions on the brane are more complicated to implement [7],and one also has to impose regular-ity and asymptotic conditions on the bulk,and it is not obvious what these should be.In GR,the OS model of collapsing dust has a Robertson-Walker interior matched to a Schwarzschild exterior.We show that even this simplest case is much more complicated on the brane.However,it does have a striking new property,which may be part of the generic collapse problem on the brane.The exterior is not Schwarzschild,and nor could we expect it to be,as dis-cussed above,but the exterior is not even static ,as shown by our no-go theorem.The reason for this lies in the na-ture of the braneworld modifications to GR.The field equations on a generalized Randall-Sundrum brane are [3]G µν=−Λg µν+8πGT µν+48πGS µν/λ−E µν,(2)where λis the brane tension (λ>108GeV 4)and the brane cosmological constant Λhas contributions from the 1tension and the bulk cosmological constant.The tensorSµνis quadratic in the energy-momentum tensor Tµν, and Eµνis the projection of the bulk Weyl tensor.Theenergy-momentum tensor satisfies the usual conservation equations,and the Bianchi identities on the brane thenimply a“conservation”equation for the tracefree Eµν:∇νTµν=0,∇νEµν=48πG∇νSµν/λ,Eµµ=0.(3) The general1+3form of these equations is given in[10].Five-dimensional corrections to thefield equations of GRare of two types[3,10].(1)High-energy corrections,given by Eµν,arise from5D gravi-ton stresses,and are constrained by Eq.(3).In the lin-earized regime they are known as massive KK modes of the graviton[2];in general,they are a signature of non-linear KK modes in the bulk.For brane-bound observers, these stresses are nonlocal:local density inhomogeneitieson the brane generate Weyl curvature in the bulk that“backreacts”nonlocally on the brane[10].Even in the absence of matter,Eµνmay be nonzero(provided that∇νEµν=0),since there may be5D Weyl curvature in the bulk,e.g.sourced by a bulk black hole,as in cos-mological braneworld models[11,12].The KK stressesfurther complicate the matching problem on the brane, since they in general contribute to the effective radial pressure at the surface.Equations(2)and(3)are the complete set of equations on the brane.They are not closed,since Eµνcontains 5D degrees of freedom that cannot be determined on the brane.A further set of5D equations[3]makes up the full closed system.However,using only the4D projected equations,we prove a no-go theorem valid for the full5D problem:given the standard matching conditions on the brane,the exterior of a collapsing dust cloud cannot be static.We are not able to determine the non-static ex-terior metric,but we expect on general physical grounds that the non-static behaviour will be transient,so that the exterior tends to a static form.The collapsing region in general contains dust and alsoenergy density on the brane from KK stresses in the bulk (this is called“dark radiation”in cosmology[11,12]).We show that in the extreme case where there is no mat-ter but only collapsing homogeneous KK energy density, there is a unique exterior which is static for physically reasonable values of the parameters.Since there is no matter on the brane to generate KK stresses,the KK energy density on the brane must arise from bulk Weyl curvature.In this case,the bulk could be pathological. The collapsing KK energy density can either bounce or form a black hole with a5D gravitational potential,and the exterior is of the Weyl-charged de Sitter type(given in[6]forΛ=0),but with no mass.The collapse region has a Robertson-Walker metric ds2=−dτ2+a(τ)2(1+13πGρ(1+ρ/2λ)+C/λa4−k/a2+14kr2).The col-lapsing boundary surfaceΣis given in the interior comov-ing coordinates as a free-fall surface,i.e.r=r0=const, so that RΣ(τ)=r0a(τ)/(1+13πa30r30ρ0(1+14kr20)−4,(7) and the“energy”per unit mass is given byE=−kr20(1+1metrics,and the radial geodesic equation for the exte-rior metric gives ˙R2=−A (R )+˜E/F (R )2,where ˜E is a constant and the dot denotes a proper time derivative,as paring this with Eq.(6)gives one con-dition.The second condition is easier to derive if we change to null coordinates.The exterior static metric,with dv =dt +dR/[F (1−2Gm/R )],becomesds 2=−F 2Adv 2+2F dvdR +R 2d Ω2.(10)The interior Robertson-Walker metric takes the form [14]ds 2=−τ2,v1−(k +˙a 2)R 2/a 2 dv 2/(1−kR 2/a 2)+2τ,v dvdR/4kr2)dR/[r ˙a −1+13/Λ.For Λ=0it is the special case M =0of the so-lutions given in [6],and the length scale H −1Q =:The cloud collapses for all E ,with hori-zon at R h =H −1Q = Q/(λ|E |)>Rh .Q <0,Λ=0|Q |/(λE ).For Λ>0,the potential is given by V/V c =−(R/R c )2 1+ǫ(R c /R )4,where V c =H/H Q ,R c =1/1−4ǫV 2c /2V c .(18)If ǫ>0there may be two horizons;then R −h is theblack hole horizon and R +h is a modified de Sitter hori-zon.When they coincide the exterior is no longer static,3but there is a black hole horizon.Ifǫ<0there is always one de Sitter-like horizon,R+h.FIG.1.The potential V(R)forΛ>0,with R given in units of R c and V given in units of V c.Q>0,Λ>02,i.e.Q>3λ/4Λ,there is no horizon,and a nakedsingularity forms.For for V c=12.If E≤−2V c,then Eq.(8) implies V c<1E2−4ǫV2c /2V c.(19) Q<0,Λ>0,we have explored the consequences for gravitational collapse of braneworld gravity effects,using the simplest possible model,i.e.an OS-like collapse on a generalized Randall-Sundrum type brane.Even in this simplest case,extra-dimensional gravity introduces new ing only the projected4D equations,we have shown,independent of the nature of the bulk,that the exterior vacuum on the brane is necessarily non-static. This contrasts strongly with GR,where the exterior is a static Schwarzschild spacetime.Although we have not found the exterior metric,we know that its non-static nature arises from(a)5D bulk graviton stresses,which transmit effects nonlocally from the interior to the exte-rior,and(b)the non-vanishing of the effective pressure at the boundary,which means that dynamical informa-tion on the interior side can be conveyed outside.Our results suggest that gravitational collapse on the brane may leave a signature in the exterior,dependent upon the dynamics of collapse,so that astrophysical black holes on the brane may in principle have KK hair.We expect that the non-static exterior will be transient and non-radiative,as follows from a perturbative study of non-static compact objects,showing that the Weyl term Eµνin the far-field region falls offmuch more rapidly than a radiative term[4].It is reasonable to assume that the exterior metric will be static at late times and tend to Schwarzschild,at least at large distances.We have analyzed the idealized collapse of homoge-neous KK energy density whose exterior is static and has purely5D gravitational potential.The collapse can ei-ther come to a halt and bounce,or form a black hole or a naked singularity,depending on the parameter values. This may be seen as a limiting idealization of a more general spherically symmetric but inhomogeneous case. The case that includes matter may be relevant to the formation of primordial black holes in which nonlinear KK energy density could play an important role.CG is supported by a PPARC studentship.MB and RM thank the Mathematical Cosmology Programme at ESI,Vienna,where part of this work was done.。