雅思写作大作文评分标准(英文版)
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:67.62 KB
- 文档页数:1
雅思作文评分标准细则雅思考试(IELTS),全称国际英语语言测试系统,外文名International English Language Testing System,由剑桥大学考试委员会外语考试部、英国文化协会及IDP教育集团共同管理,是一种针英语能力,下面就是整理的雅思作文评分标准细则,一起来看一下吧。
雅思作文评分标准细则解读1. Task response & Task achievement此项评分标准检测的是考生是否恰当回答了写作要求的程度(degree to which the exam question has been answered properly).Task 1的要求是考生在大约20分钟内完成一篇至少150字的文章,包括:summarize, describe or explain 图表所包含的信息,同时也需要对相关信息进行比较。
因此完成一篇较好的小作文,需要做到以下几点:1)Identify ALL key features (找出图表中所有的关键信息)2)Provide sufficient detail for a meaningful explanation(进行解释说明时提供充分、适量的信息),但是不要太多也不要太少!(突然想起了老外吐槽咱们中国食谱中的加盐“少许”)同时保证在描写趋势和数据时的准确性。
3)A clear overview (一个清晰的概述):summarise significant trends/features(总结出最明显的趋势和特征)Task 2 的要求是考生在大约40分钟内完成一篇至少250字的文章:就某一问题阐述自己的观点,并使用证据来支持此观点。
请注意:task 2 的分值比task 1要高! 那么要完成一篇出色的大作文,需要注意以下几点:1)respond completely to all parts of the question (回答题目中的所有要求)2)develop and support your ideas (提出并使用论据支持自己的观点):不要只提观点!添加explanations, examples or experiences!3)ensure your opinion is clear (保证整篇文章的观点清晰一致)最后,提供考生们在写作时可以运用的一个checklist:标出题目中的关键词;找出问题中有几个部分;保证完成题目中的所有要求;写作之前先梳理出观点并确定其相关性;然后将观点进行分类和排序;严格遵循建议时间(20min+40 min)并达到最低字数要求。
雅思写作的四个评分标准雅思写作是雅思考试中的一项重要组成部分,它的评分标准影响着考生的得分和整体成绩。
对于考生来说,了解雅思写作的评分标准对于提高写作能力和提高分数至关重要。
以下是雅思写作的四个评分标准:1. 任务完成(Task Response)任务完成是评判一篇雅思写作的第一个标准。
它涉及到考生是否能够正确理解题目要求,并能够完全、准确地回答问题。
考试官会根据文章对问题的回答的清晰度、连贯性和准确性来评判考生在任务完成方面的表现。
2. 语言表达(Coherence and Cohesion)语言表达是用来评判一篇雅思写作的连贯性和结构是否清晰。
考生需要有效地运用各种连词、过渡词、句子结构和段落结构,使文章具有逻辑性和一致性,并且能够使读者明白文章的主要观点。
文章应该有清晰的结构,包括引言、主体和结论。
3. 词汇运用(Lexical Resource)词汇运用是用来评判一个考生使用词汇的丰富程度和准确性。
考生需要运用恰当的词汇来表达自己的意思,包括使用合适的时态、语法结构和专业术语。
考生还需要运用多样化的词汇,以避免重复和单调,同时要确保使用词汇符合文章的主题和语境。
4. 语法准确性(Grammatical Range and Accuracy)语法准确性是用来评判一个考生在使用语法结构和句法结构方面的准确性和多样性。
考生需要正确运用各种时态、语态、句式和从句等语法结构,以及正确使用标点符号。
考生还需要避免常见的语法错误,如主谓一致、冠词使用错误等。
在评分过程中,考官会综合这四个标准进行评估,并给出相应的分数。
任务完成和语言表达所占的权重相对较大,而词汇运用和语法准确性所占的权重相对较小。
考生在准备雅思写作时,应注重针对这四个评分标准进行有针对性的训练和练习,以提高自己的写作水平和获得更高的分数。
雅思作文大小作文打分规则英文回答:Scoring criteria for IELTS writing tasks vary slightly between the two tasks: Task 1 (Academic) and Task 2 (both Academic and General Training). Let's start with Task 1.For Task 1, the examiner assesses your ability to accurately describe and summarize visual information presented in the form of a graph, chart, or diagram. The scoring criteria include four main aspects: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy.Task Achievement focuses on how well you address all parts of the task and present a clear overview. It assesses your ability to select and report the main features, make comparisons, and identify significant trends or patterns in the data.Coherence and Cohesion evaluates how well your writingis organized and connected. It looks at the logical progression of ideas, the use of paragraphing, and the appropriate use of linking words and phrases.Lexical Resource examines your vocabulary range and accuracy. It assesses your ability to use a wide range of words appropriately and effectively, as well as yourability to paraphrase and use collocations.Grammatical Range and Accuracy focuses on your controlof grammar and sentence structures. It assesses yourability to use a variety of sentence structures accurately, as well as your ability to use punctuation correctly.Now let's move on to Task 2.Task 2 is an essay task where you need to present and support your opinion on a given topic. The scoring criteria for Task 2 are similar to Task 1, but with some differences. The four main aspects are Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range andAccuracy.Task Response assesses how well you address the task and present a clear position. It looks at the development of ideas, the support of arguments, and the ability to provide relevant examples.Coherence and Cohesion evaluates the organization and connection of ideas, similar to Task 1. It also looks at the logical progression of arguments and the use of cohesive devices.Lexical Resource examines your vocabulary range and accuracy, similar to Task 1. It also assesses your ability to use idiomatic language and expressions appropriately.Grammatical Range and Accuracy focuses on your control of grammar and sentence structures, similar to Task 1. It also assesses your ability to use complex sentences, as well as your ability to use grammatical structures accurately.In conclusion, the scoring criteria for IELTS writing tasks assess various aspects of your writing, including task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range and accuracy. It is important to address all parts of the task, organize your ideas logically, use a wide range of vocabulary appropriately, and demonstrate control of grammar and sentence structures.中文回答:雅思写作任务的评分标准在两个任务之间略有不同,任务1(学术类)和任务2(学术类和培训类通用)。
雅思作文评分标准英文回答:The IELTS Writing test is scored based on four criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammar. Each criterion is worth 25% of the total score, and the scores are averaged to determine the final score.Task Achievement refers to how well you have addressed the prompt and fulfilled the requirements of the task. This includes the content of your essay, the development of your ideas, and the organization of your thoughts. To score well in this criterion, you need to stay on topic, provide relevant examples and details, and present a clear andwell-structured argument.Coherence and Cohesion refers to how well your essay flows and how effectively you use linking words and phrases to connect your ideas. This includes the use of paragraphs, topic sentences, and transitions. To score well in thiscriterion, you need to ensure that your essay is easy to follow and that your ideas are logically connected.Lexical Resource refers to your ability to use a wide range of vocabulary accurately and appropriately. This includes using synonyms, idiomatic expressions, and academic vocabulary. To score well in this criterion, you need to demonstrate a strong command of the English language and use appropriate vocabulary for the task.Grammar refers to your ability to use correct grammar, including sentence structure, verb tenses, and punctuation. To score well in this criterion, you need to demonstrate a good understanding of English grammar and avoid common errors.Overall, to score well on the IELTS Writing test, you need to address the prompt effectively, organize your thoughts logically, use appropriate vocabulary, and demonstrate a strong command of English grammar.中文回答:雅思写作考试的评分标准包括四个方面,任务完成度、连贯与衔接、词汇资源和语法。
雅思大作文四项评分标准考官这样解释是需要雅思成绩的,今天我整理了雅思大作文四项评分标准的相关内容,有需要的同学们赶紧来阅读看看,希望对你有帮助。
1、Task response 即对应题目要求。
简单来说,就是不能偏题。
要回答题目要求你回答的内容。
要求有明确观点,根据题目要求来写,所举的例子都要能论证观点的。
英国作业写作对于本篇作文,考官的观点如下:As I mentioned above, misunderstanding the task (or you understand the task; however, your writing impede the communication) will affect this score.You also need to further develop your answer by giving explanations.(正如之前提到的,你对题目的理解有些偏差,或者说你理解了题目,但是你写出来的文章却有跑题之嫌。
此外,你还需要更深入、更清楚的解释你的观点,可以借助举例来详细的解释你的观点。
)2、Coherence & Cohesion 连贯性和逻辑。
逻辑性就是要求因果之间有较为直接的联系,不要跳跃性的思维。
这点是很多中国考生所忽略的,一定要是直接的原因或者结果才能紧跟其后。
而连贯性的要求就要使用恰当适合的连词,使得文章的联系更为紧密。
这篇文章考官认为:Cohesion of your essay is okay; however, cohesive devices should be used wisely and also need to examine the suggestion I gave to you in your preceding essay, as you made the same mistake again.(这篇文章的逻辑连贯性还算OK,但是连接词的使用还需提高,用法上应该更广泛,更准确。
Marking Criteria of IELTS Academic Writing Task 2IELTS Academic Writing Scripts are marked on four basic criteria, and each one has equal weight.Task Response1. Have you understood the topic of the question and the type of response required?2. Have you answered all the parts of the question?3. Have you developed some main ideas about this topic?4. Have you given examples, reasons or details to support your ideas?5. Have you written at least 250 words?Coherence(连贯性)and Cohesion(衔接)1.Have you written a clear introduction paragraph that explains the topic,and tells the reader the organization of your response?2.Does your response have a clear point of view that is developed throughoutyour answer?1.Does your response have clear paragraphs?4. Does each paragraph have ONE topic and a topic sentence?5. Have you used a variety of appropriate linking expressions to show the structure of your response?6. Have you used pronoun(代词)referencing and synonyms(同义词)to avoid repetition?Grammatical Range and Accuracy1. Have you used a variety of sentence structures?2. Have you used noun phrases to express your ideas?3. Have you used appropriate verb tenses?4. Have you controlled you subject-verb agreement?5. Have you used correct punctuation?6. Overall, is your grammar accurate?Lexical(词汇的) Resource (Vocabulary)1. Have you used a variety of appropriate and academic words?2. Have you used correct word forms?3. Have you spelled the words correctly?。
雅思大作文6分评分标准雅思大作文6分评分标准1. 任务完成情况task response主要包括三个方面:内容(content)是否切题,立场(position)是否鲜明并得到有效阐释,结构(structure)是否有逻辑性。
内容如何做到切题,关键在于审题时要找准题目的主题(topic)以及针对该主题所提出的问题(topic questions)。
一般来说,主题就是题目中反复出现或主句中充当主语或宾语的名词以及名词短语,而问句则通常就是我们要讨论的要点,如果要点理解有误或漏掉某个要点,则都属于没有切题。
譬如:With the increasing use of mobile phones, less people tend to write letters. Some people believe that writing letters will disappear completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree?这个题目当中writing letters出现的频率较高,且都在主句中出现,说明它就是我们要找的主题,如果你过多描述mobile phones给我们带来的好处就跑题了。
另外,题目的写作任务也很清楚:Do you agree that writing letters will disappear completely? 属于“支持或反对”类的题,必须明确表达你的立场,不能既同意又不同意,同时表达你同意或不同意的理由。
立场要做到鲜明并得到有效阐释需要有如下几个内容:topicsentence(主题句),main ideas(论点),supporting points(论据)。
主题句通常放在文章的首段,开门见山地表明你的立场,主题句只能有一个。
论点放在中间段的首句,让读者一目了然,论点应该有两个以上,否则论证就不充分;论据包括evidence(证据)、examples(例子)等,放在论点后面,每个论点都应该有论据作支撑,否则就会显得论据不足。
雅思大作文评分标准细则always ?logically they do impede com municanottio n5?addresses the task only?presents information ?uses a limited ?uses only a partially; ?the format withrange oflimited rangemay be in appropriate insome ?orga ni sati on vocabulary, ?bu of ?structuresplacesbut there may be a t thisis?attemptslackof overallmini mally?expresses a position progressi on adequateforcomplexbut the ?developme nt isthe tasksentencesnot always clear and ?makesin adequate,but ?these tendthere may be noin accurate?may make tobe lesscon clusi ons draw nor?over-useofno ticeable accurate tha n?prese nts some maincohesive deviceserrorssimplein ?spelli ng sentencesideas but these ?are ?may be repetitivean d/or wordlimitedandnotbecause of lack ?of formatio n that?may makesufficie ntly developed; refere ncingandfreque ntmay causethere may be irrelevant substituti ongrammaticalsome difficulty detail?may not write infor the reader?errors andparagraphs,pun ctuati onor ?paragraphing maymay be faulty;be in adequateerrors cancausesomedifficultyfor ?the reader4??responds to the task ??prese nts??uses on ly ??uses only aonly in a ?minimal way in formati on and ideas basic very limitedor thean swerisbut ?these arenotvocabularyrangetangen tial; the formatarran ged cohere ntly which ?may be of ?structuresmay be in appropriateand there is no clear usedwith only rare??prese nts a positi onprogressi onthe ?resp onseinrepetitivelyor useofwhich may be subord in ate but this is ?un clearin appropriateclauses??presents some main??uses somebasicfor the taskcohesive devices ?but someideas but these ?arethesemaybe??has limitedstructures are difficult to identify andin accurateor control ofaccurate but?errorsmaybe repetitive,word ?formatio。
雅思作文评分标准雅思写作分为任务一和任务二两个部分,每部分的评分标准略有不同。
以下是针对雅思写作任务二的评分标准。
1. 任务完成度(Task Achievement):写作是否达到了任务要求。
- 完全达到任务要求:针对题目中的所有要求进行了充分论述,能够清楚地表达自己的观点和观点的支持。
- 基本达到任务要求:描述或论述主题和相关细节,但可能在论述的逻辑上存在一些缺陷。
或者,虽然能够明确表达立场,但细节不一致或不充分。
- 未达到任务要求:没有充分论述题目要求的主题和相关细节;或没有明确表达自己的立场。
2. 语言的运用(Coherence and Cohesion):语言的连贯性和衔接性。
- 连贯性:思路流畅,能够清晰地表达观点、观点间有序的衔接。
- 衔接性:使用恰当的连接词、短语和句子结构来建立段落之间和句子之间的逻辑关系。
3. 词汇(Lexical Resource):词汇的准确性和丰富性。
- 词汇的准确性:使用恰当的词汇来表达意思,并且没有重复使用同一个词或使用错误的词。
- 词汇的丰富性:使用多样的词汇,不仅仅限于基本的词汇,而且能够灵活运用。
4. 语法(Grammatical Range and Accuracy):语法的正确性和多样性。
- 语法的正确性:使用正确的句法结构,并避免语法错误。
- 语法的多样性:使用不同的句型结构和语法结构来表达意思。
以上是雅思写作任务二的评分标准,每个评分标准都有不同的分数范围,取决于候考人的表现。
考生需要在规定的时间内准备和完成一篇有逻辑性和内容完整的写作,同时还要注意语言表达的准确性和多样性。
在备考中,可以通过练习模拟题和参加写作班等方式提高自己的写作水平。
雅思写作评分标准-中英对照The XXX based on a set of criteria。
For the Task 1 Writing n。
there are two main categories: XXX.X of 9 in this category means that the candidate has XXX of the task。
They have developed their response XXX。
XXX's n。
They have also used a wide range of vocabulary and structureswith full XXX。
Any errors made are rare and only XXX.A score of 8 in this category means that the XXX have presented。
highlighted。
and XXX。
They have also managed alln and XXX。
fluently。
XXX are error-free。
and they make only very nal errors.Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A score of 9 in this category means that the XXX grammar。
using structures with full XXX.A score of 8 in this category means that the XXX vocabulary and structures。
presenting them well with n。
They have a good command of grammar。
and any errors made are only XXX.Overall。
雅思写作的评分标准雅思写作是雅思考试的其中一个模块,对于大多数考生而言,写作是一个相对较难的部分。
无论是从表达能力还是语法准确性来说,写作都是需要反复练习和积累的。
为了帮助考生更好地准备雅思写作,以下将介绍雅思写作的评分标准。
一、任务完成 (Task Achievement):5分雅思写作的首要评分标准是任务完成程度。
考生需要理解题目中的要求,并清晰地表达自己的观点和意见。
评判任务完成的关键在于考生是否对题目进行了完整和准确的回答。
二、语法与词汇 (Grammar and Vocabulary):5分语法和词汇的准确性是雅思写作中另一个重要的评分标准。
考生需要能够正确运用各种语法结构和词汇,并通过准确的用词和语法结构表达自己的意思。
拼写和标点符号的正确使用也是此项评分标准的一部分。
三、语言运用 (Coherence and Cohesion):5分语言的连贯性和衔接性对于写作的质量至关重要。
考生需要能够使用适当的连接词、过渡词和句子结构,使全文内容衔接紧密,逻辑清晰。
段落的划分和组织也需要合理,使文章结构清晰明了。
四、适当的表达 (Lexical Resource):5分适当的表达是指考生能够使用多样化的词汇和句式来表达自己的意思。
考生需要使用恰当的词汇和表达方式来丰富文章内容,避免重复使用相同的词语。
此项评分标准也评估考生对于词汇用法的灵活运用能力。
五、思想和观点 (Task Response):5分思想和观点是考生写作中对问题、话题进行分析和讨论的能力。
考生需要具备独立思考的能力,能够提出合理且有说服力的观点。
此项评分标准还评估考生对于问题和话题的深入思考程度。
综上所述,雅思写作的评分标准包括任务完成、语法与词汇、语言运用、适当的表达和思想和观点。
考生需要在写作过程中注重以上几个方面的要求,提高自己的写作水平和能力。
通过不断的练习和积累,相信每个考生都能够在雅思写作中取得不错的成绩。
雅思写作评分标准对照表雅思写作的评分标准,主要根据四个方面进行评定,包括任务响应(Task Response)、连贯性和衔接(Coherence and Cohesion)、词汇和语法(Vocabulary and Grammar)以及发展观点和论证(Ideas, Development, and Support)。
以下是相关标准的详细对照表:任务响应(Task Response):9分:完全符合任务要求,清晰准确地表述自己的观点,并提供具体的例子和论证。
结构合乎逻辑,信息完整、准确、恰如其分。
8分:清晰表达自己的观点,并提供相关的例子和论证,基本符合任务要求,但可能存在一些小的问题,如信息的完整性或准确性。
7分:在一般任务要求下,清晰地表达自己的观点,并提供一定的例子和论证,但可能存在一些问题,如信息的不完全或不准确。
6分:基本履行了任务要求,但可能存在一些不清晰的表达或一些有限的例子和论证。
5分:基本理解了任务,但任务响应存在一些模糊或一些未能提供充分的例子和论证。
4分:理解任务,但表达模糊不清,未能提供有效的例子和论证。
3分:未能有效理解任务要求,只提供了非常基本或不相关的观点。
2分:未能有效参与任务,只提供了非常有限的信息。
1分:未能完成任务,只提供了不相关或不一致的信息。
0分:什么都没有写,或只写了一些不相关的内容。
连贯性和衔接(Coherence and Cohesion):9分:文章结构清晰,段落之间的衔接自然流畅,使用了适当的链接词和短语,使文章整体连贯。
8分:文章结构清晰,段落之间的衔接自然流畅,使用了一些适当的链接词和短语,使文章整体连贯,但可能存在一些不连贯之处。
7分:文章结构基本清晰,段落之间存在一些连贯性问题,但整体上看仍然能够理解。
6分:文章结构基本清晰,但段落之间缺乏明显的衔接,表达不够连贯。
5分:文章结构不太清晰,段落之间缺乏明确的衔接,表达不连贯。
4分:文章结构不清晰,段落之间缺乏明确的衔接,表达不连贯。
雅思大作文评分标准细则 Band Task Response Coherence & Cohesion Lexical resource Grammar range and accuracy 9 ? fully addresses all parts of the ?task ? presents a fully developed ?position in answer to the question with relevant, fully extended and well supported ideas ?uses cohesion in such a way that ?it attracts no attention ?skillfully manages paragraphing ?uses a wide range of vocabulary ?with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor ?errors occur only as ‘slips’ ?uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’
8 ??sufficiently addresses all parts ?of the task ??presents a well-developed response ?to the question with relevant, extended and supported ideas ?sequences information and ideas ?logically ?manages all aspects of cohesion ?well ??uses paragraphing sufficiently and ?appropriately ?uses a wide range of vocabulary ?fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings ?skilfully uses uncommon lexical ?items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation ?produces rare errors in spelling ?and/or word formation ?uses a wide range of structures ??the majority of sentences are ?error-free ??makes only very occasional errors ?or inappropriacies
WRITING TASK 2: Band Descriptors (public version)BandTask responseCoherence and cohesionLexical resourceGrammatical range and accuracy9•fully addresses all parts of the task•presents a fully developed position in answer to the question with relevant, fully extended and well supported ideas•uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention •skilfully manages paragraphing•uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’•uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’8•sufficiently addresses all parts of the task•presents a well-developed response to the question with relevant, extended and supported ideas•sequences information and ideas logically •manages all aspects of cohesion well•uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately•uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings•skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation •produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation •uses a wide range of structures•the majority of sentences are error-free•makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies 7•addresses all parts of the task •presents a clear position throughout the response•presents, extends and supports main ideas, but there maybe a tendency to over-generalise and/or supporting ideasmay lack focus •logically organises information and ideas; there is clearprogression throughout •uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use •presents a clear central topic within each paragraph •uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision•uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation•may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation•uses a variety of complex structures •produces frequent error-free sentences•has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors6•addresses all parts of the task although some parts may be more fully covered than others•presents a relevant position although the conclusions may become unclear or repetitive•presents relevant main ideas but some may be inadequately developed/unclear•arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression•uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical •may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately •uses paragraphing, but not always logically•uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task •attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy•makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication•uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms•makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication5•addresses the task only partially; the format may be inappropriate in places •expresses a position but the development is not always clear and there may be no conclusions drawn •presents some main ideas but these are limited and not sufficiently developed; there may be irrelevant detail •presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of overall progression •makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices •may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution•may not write in paragraphs, or paragraphing may be inadequate•uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task•may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader•uses only a limited range of structures•attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences•may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader4•responds to the task only in a minimal way or the answer is tangential; the format may be inappropriate •presents a position but this is unclear•presents some main ideas but these are difficult to identify and may be repetitive, irrelevant or not well supported•presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in theresponse •uses some basic cohesive devices but these may beinaccurate or repetitive •may not write in paragraphs or their use may be confusing•uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the task •has limited control of word formation and/or spelling; errors may cause strain for the reader •uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses•some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty3•does not adequately address any part of the task •does not express a clear position •presents few ideas, which are largely undeveloped orirrelevant•does not organise ideas logically •may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, andthose used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas •uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word formation and/or spelling •errors may severely distort the message•attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort the meaning2•barely responds to the task •does not express a position•may attempt to present one or two ideas but there is no development•has very little control of organisational features •uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation and/or spelling•cannot use sentence forms except in memorised phrases1•answer is completely unrelated to the task •fails to communicate any message •can only use a few isolated words •cannot use sentence forms at all•does not attend•does not attempt the task in any way •writes a totally memorised responseIELTS is jointly owned by the British Council, IDP: IELTS Australia and the University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (Cambridge ESOL).Page 1 of 1。