Therapeutic targets for malaria_ adjunctive therapies
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:649.02 KB
- 文档页数:12
治疗目标试验治疗目标试验(Therapeutic Target Experiment)随着现代医学的不断发展和进步,治疗目标试验也逐渐成为了临床研究领域中一个重要的研究手段。
治疗目标试验是指通过对疾病患者进行特定治疗措施,观察和评估其对患者病情的治疗作用和效果,从而寻找并验证合理的治疗目标和策略。
下面就让我们一起来看看治疗目标试验的意义、方法和应用。
治疗目标试验的最大意义就是能够帮助临床医生和研究者找到有效的治疗方法并验证其疗效,从而为临床实践提供可靠的依据。
通过治疗目标试验可以明确特定目标治疗是否可以显著改善患者病情,是否可以减少疾病相关的并发症和不良影响,以及是否可以提高患者的生活质量。
换句话说,治疗目标试验的目的就是帮助医生更好地理解和处理患者的病情,实现个体化治疗和优质医疗。
那么,治疗目标试验的方法又是如何进行的呢?通常来说,治疗目标试验可以分为观察性研究和实验性研究两种。
观察性研究是收集和分析患者的临床数据,对比不同治疗方法的效果,推论出最佳的治疗目标。
而实验性研究则是在真实临床环境中,对患者进行特定治疗干预,观察和评估干预对患者病情的影响。
常用的实验性研究方法包括随机对照试验、单病例试验和队列研究等。
这些研究方法可以帮助医生和研究者更加客观和准确地评估治疗效果,找到最适合患者的个体化治疗目标。
除了方法上的不同外,治疗目标试验在临床实践中也有广泛的应用。
例如,在肿瘤治疗领域,治疗目标试验可以帮助医生确定最佳的化疗和靶向治疗策略,以提高患者的生存率和生活质量。
在心脑血管疾病领域,治疗目标试验可以帮助医生确定最佳的降压和降脂治疗目标,以预防心脑血管事件的发生。
在慢性疼痛管理中,治疗目标试验可以帮助医生确定最佳的镇痛药物和治疗策略,以减轻患者的痛苦和提高日常生活功能。
总之,治疗目标试验是一个重要的临床研究手段,可以帮助医生和研究者明确并验证治疗目标和策略。
通过治疗目标试验,我们可以更加客观地评估治疗效果,找到最适合患者的个体化治疗目标,提高患者的生活质量和医疗效果。
2024贝伐珠单抗长期治疗诱导胶质母细胞瘤侵袭转移的研究进展要点(全文)胶质母细胞瘤(glioblasto ma,GBM)是最常见和最具侵袭性的原发性脑肿瘤。
尽管对GBM进行手术、放疗和化疗,但其复发仍不可避免。
目前标准治疗方案是最大程度地安全切除,然后进行放化疗(CRT)。
放射治疗总剂量60Gy,在6周内分30次完成,同时每日使用替莫嗤胺,后续辅助替莫嗤胺治疗6个月。
诊断和治疗后的中位生存期为12~15个月。
美国目前GBM5年生存率约为5%。
在替莫嗤胺之外,美国食品药品监督管理局千2009年快速批准贝伐株单抗(bevacizumab,BVZ)用千治疗GBM。
BVZ是一种靶向抑制血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growth factor, VEG F)的特异性抗体,其试图阻止肿瘤血管生成,从而减少肿瘤血液供应,减缓肿瘤细胞扩散。
然而随着研究不断深入,研究发现:B VZ 对胶质瘤仅发挥轻微的抗肿瘤作用,主要用千症状控制,在总生存率方面无显著益处,反而会增强肿瘤侵袭性。
本文就BV Z治疗GBM诱发侵袭转移的机制,以及用千预测BVZ治疗反应的特异性标志物展开论述。
1.BVZ在G BM的应用BVZ治疗GBM的首次临床试验是2009年的“AVF3708g/BRAIN"和“NCI06-C-0064E二期试验。
在试验中,BVZ单药或联合伊立替康治疗GBM的客观有效率为28%~40%,6个月无进展生存率为40%~50%,与较高的历史对照组相比改善显著,但总体生存率为38%~40%并无改善。
随后,2014年完成的两项田期临床试验评估在原发GBM中应用BV Z 辅助标准放化疗方案的价值,研究结果显示:应用BVZ联合标准放化疗治疗的病人与仅采用标准放化疗方案的病人相比,无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS)有显著改善(10.6个月VS6.2个月),但总生存期(o verall survival, OS)并无显著差异(16.7个月VS 16.8个月)。
核酸协同姜黄素靶向富集技术及在光动力防脱生发中的应用哎呀,今天我们来聊聊一个有趣又神奇的话题:核酸和姜黄素的搭配,听起来是不是很高大上?它的背后可是有不少故事和惊喜的。
你们知道吗,脱发问题真的是让很多人感到头疼,尤其是那些还年轻的朋友们,心里那种感觉就像是夏天没空调一样难受。
可是,别担心,咱们今天要讨论的这项技术,有可能让你的头发重新焕发生机。
咱们得说说“核酸”。
别看这个名字听起来像是化学课上的公式,实际上,它在咱们身体里可是个重要角色。
想象一下,核酸就像是身体里的小工匠,忙忙碌碌地修补和维护咱们的细胞。
头发的生长也和它有密切关系,缺了它,头发就可能“罢工”。
而姜黄素呢,哎呀,大家应该都听说过,那个黄色的粉末,不仅是厨房里的好帮手,还有着很强的抗氧化和抗炎作用,简直是个小英雄。
好,咱们现在把这两位角色结合起来。
核酸协同姜黄素靶向富集技术,这可不是简单的“你加我,我加你”。
它们结合后,就像是爱情故事里的完美搭档,互相补充,实力倍增。
姜黄素能把核酸送到需要的地方,帮助头发更好地吸收营养,这样一来,头发不仅长得快,还健康得多。
试想一下,满头秀发在阳光下闪闪发光的样子,谁不想要呢?现在,让我们来看看这项技术在光动力防脱生发中的应用。
听起来是不是很酷?这就是借助光线的力量,促进咱们头发的生长。
想象一下,咱们坐在那儿,享受着温暖的阳光,心里美滋滋的,头发也在悄悄地长长。
通过这种技术,光能激发咱们头皮里的活性,让那些懒洋洋的毛囊重新振作,开始工作。
就像是冬眠的熊被叫醒了,哗啦啦,头发开始茁壮成长。
光动力的过程也不乏乐趣哦。
咱们可以把它当成一种养生的方式,轻松又愉快。
你想啊,躺在舒适的沙发上,听着轻音乐,享受着光的滋养,真是一种享受。
配合着姜黄素和核酸的神奇组合,效果更是事半功倍。
头发不仅变得浓密,而且还会变得更加光滑,根本不需要再担心那些毛躁的问题。
咱们也不能忽视日常的护理。
毕竟,万事开头难,光靠技术不行,日常护理也得跟上。
强直性脊柱炎患者福利新药已获国家批准1月4日,西安杨森制药有限公司今天宣布,国家食品药品监督管理总局已经批准欣普(SIMPONI),即戈利木单抗注射液,用于治疗活动性强直性脊柱炎成年患者;也可联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗对MTX在内的改善病情抗风湿药物疗效不佳的中到重度活动性类风湿关节炎成年患者。
欣普尼是全人源化抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)单克隆抗体,是中国首个获批的每月皮下注射一次的抗风湿生物制剂。
在我国,强直性脊柱炎的患病率为0.3%,多发于20-30岁的年轻人,主要累及脊椎,也可侵犯关节外的其他脏器和组织,如眼、皮肤、肾脏、肺、心脏等;而类风湿关节炎的患病率为0.2-0.4%,好发于30-50岁,女性多于男性,多表现为手、足小关节的多关节、对称性的慢性炎症性病变。
这两种慢性疾病的患者通常要长期忍受炎症所造成的如影随形的疼痛,有些还需应对关节损伤和残疾。
很多患者感到疲劳、沮丧,需要频繁就医治疗,学习、生活、工作、社交等诸多方面受到不同程度的影响。
西安杨森制药有限公司总裁AsgarRangoonwala表示:“在西安杨森,‘以患者为中心’是我们开展所有工作的核心,我们会尽一切努力加速上市欣普尼这款创新产品,进一步增强我们的免疫产品线,从而更好地服务中国千万饱受疼痛困扰的慢性免疫病患者。
”据了解,欣普尼已在94个国家获批。
@医务室(yiwushi120)。
论著自发性脑出血后脑组织差异基因的生物信息学分析郑诗豪1,黄绍崧1,陈忠仪1,张扬1,刘宇清1,洪文瑶1,黄俊鹏2(1.福建省立医院 神经外科,福州 350001;2.福建省立医院 肿瘤内科,福州350001)[摘要]目的利用基因表达数据库(gene expression omnibus,GEO)探究自发性脑出血后脑组织中的差异表达基因,为探寻脑出血后脑组织继发性脑损伤的发病机制提供新思路,为脑出血的治疗提供新的治疗靶点。
方法选取数据库中编号为GSE24265的芯片作为研究对象,应用R语言中的相关函数筛选出芯片中符合条件的差异基因,进一步对差异基因进行功能富集分析,并构建差异基因对应的蛋白质间相互作用网络图,根据蛋白质间相互作用的关系作用对数筛选关键差异基因。
结果筛选出脑出血后脑组织中差异表达的基因70个,其中表达上调基因62个,表达下调基因8个。
基因本体(geneontology,GO )富集分析结果显示差异基因主要分布在细胞的胞质囊腔、特定分泌颗粒、分泌颗粒内腔、分泌颗粒膜、血红蛋白与珠蛋白复合体、内吞作用囊泡上,中性粒细胞激活、中性粒细胞介导的免疫反应、白细胞、粒细胞的驱化生物过程中,以及趋化因子活性、趋化因子受体结合、G蛋白耦联受体、细胞因子活性、细胞因子受体结合、氧载体活性、葡萄糖跨膜转运蛋白活性等功能活动中。
京都基因与基因组百科全书(kyoto encyclopediaof genes and genomes,KEGG)通路富集分析显示,差异基因主要介导Toll受体转导通路、肿瘤坏死因子(tumor necrosis factor,TNF)信号通路、沙门菌感染、吞噬体、疟疾、军团病、细胞因子受体相互作用、趋化因子信号通路、南美锥虫病趋化因子等信号通路。
通过蛋白质相互作用网络,进一步挖掘得到可能在脑出血后参与脑组织继发性脑损伤进程的20个关键基因,包括CXCL8、IL6、TLR2、CXCL1、CCL4、SERPINE1、CCL20、PPBP、TIMP1、TREM1、CD163、HMOX1等。
专利名称:Therapeutic Target for Musculoskeletal Inflammation发明人:Anna Plaas,Vincent Wang,JohnSandy,Rebecca Bell,Jorge Galante,Katie J.Trella申请号:US15111395申请日:20150114公开号:US20160333410A1公开日:20161117专利内容由知识产权出版社提供摘要:A method for monitoring a treatment of a subject having a musculoskeletal disorder is provided. The method includes measuring a first expression level of at least two biomarkers at a treatment site prior to the treatment and measuring a second expression level of the at least two biomarkers at the treatment site after the treatment begins. The method further includes comparing the first expression level of the at least two biomarkers prior to the treatment to the second expression level of the at least two biomarkers post treatment and continuing the treatment, altering the treatment or stopping the treatment based on the comparison. A method of treating a musculoskeletal disorder in a subject is also provided. The method includes removing a aggrecan-hyaluronan matrix from a treatment site in the subject.申请人:RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER,THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS地址:Chicago IL US,Urbana IL US国籍:US,US更多信息请下载全文后查看。
2020.11科学技术创新SET 蛋白在肿瘤中的作用及其治疗潜力赵娜郭长缨*(中国药科大学,江苏南京210000)SET ,根据其功能也称为模板激活因子-I β(TAF-I β),蛋白磷酸酶抑制剂2(I2PP2A ),IGAAD 和PHAPII ,在人体组织中普遍表达,是一种涉及多功能的癌蛋白,主要包括凋亡,基因转录与复制,DNA 损伤修复,核小体装配,组蛋白伴侣和雄激素合成等。
与在不同细胞类型中变化的SET-α相比,SET-β的表达更广泛且相对恒定。
SET-β启动子不含TATA ,并且富含G /C 。
MYC ,SP1,RUNX1和GATA2形成调节SET-β转录激活的多蛋白转录复合物,同时近端启动子区域中4个锌指和X 连锁因子(ZFX )结合位点对于SET-β的反式激活至关重要[1]。
SET 首先被鉴定为与急性未分化白血病患者的CAN 基因融合的易位基因,对该融合基因的研究揭示了SET 与癌症发生及其转移之间的联系。
另外,由于其在细胞功能中的作用,其失调,尤其是过表达,还能导致阿尔茨海默症,多囊卵巢综合征[2]等。
SET 被普遍认定为一种细胞核蛋白,在稳态条件下,SET 蛋白的一部分以随机的方式转移到细胞质中。
已经鉴定6AKVSKK 11和168KRSSQTQNKASRKR 181为SET 蛋白的核定位信号。
除核定位信号,SET β的亚细胞定位受磷酸化,K68位SUMO 酰化[3],蛋白酶切割(例如GZMA 和AEP )及其酸性尾部的调控。
最近,在了解SET 的生理和病理功能方面已经取得了重大进展。
在这种情况下,我们将SET 与功能病理的联系及其作为潜在治疗靶标的前景作一综述。
1SET 与肿瘤SET 在快速分裂的细胞中表达高,并且能起癌基因的作用,促进肿瘤发生[4,5],且SET 蛋白已被证明在不同类型恶性肿瘤中过表达,例如乳腺癌[6],卵巢癌[7],肝癌[8],非小细胞肺癌[9]等。
SET 在肿瘤发生与进展中发挥重要作用的可能机制如下:1.1PP2A 抑制剂PP2A 通过负调节许多致癌相关信号通路,在肿瘤转化中发挥关键作用[10],并可作为治疗靶标。
益生菌对阿尔茨海默病作用的研究进展发布时间:2021-12-14T06:08:15.523Z 来源:《中国结合医学杂志》2021年12期作者:宋鑫萍1,2,李盛钰2,金清1[导读] 阿尔茨海默病已成为威胁全球老年人生命健康的主要疾病之一,患者数量逐年攀升,其护理的经济成本高,给全球经济造成重大挑战。
近年来研究显示,益生菌在适量使用时作为有益于宿主健康的微生物,在防治阿尔茨海默病方面具有积极影响,其作用机制可能通过调节肠道菌群,影响神经免疫系统,调控神经活性物质以及代谢产物,通过肠-脑轴影响该病发生和发展。
宋鑫萍1,2,李盛钰2,金清11.延边大学农学院,吉林延吉 1330022.吉林省农业科学院农产品加工研究所,吉林长春 130033摘要:阿尔茨海默病已成为威胁全球老年人生命健康的主要疾病之一,患者数量逐年攀升,其护理的经济成本高,给全球经济造成重大挑战。
近年来研究显示,益生菌在适量使用时作为有益于宿主健康的微生物,在防治阿尔茨海默病方面具有积极影响,其作用机制可能通过调节肠道菌群,影响神经免疫系统,调控神经活性物质以及代谢产物,通过肠-脑轴影响该病发生和发展。
本文综述了近几年来国内外益生菌对阿尔茨海默病的作用进展,以及其预防和治疗阿尔茨海默病的潜在作用机制。
关键词:益生菌;阿尔茨海默病;肠道菌群;机制Recent Progress in Research on Probiotics Effect on Alzheimer’s DiseaseSONG Xinping1,2,LI Shengyu2,JI Qing1*(1.College of Agricultural, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002,China)(2.Institute of Agro-food Technology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chanchun 130033, China)Abstract:Alzheimer’s disease has become one of the major diseases threatening the life and health of the global elderly. The number of patients is increasing year by year, and the economic cost of nursing is high, which poses a major challenge to the global economy. In recent years, studies have shown that probiotics, as microorganisms beneficial to the health of the host, have a positive impact on the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Its mechanism may be through regulating intestinal flora, affecting the nervous immune system, regulating the neuroactive substances and metabolites, and affecting the occurrence and development of the disease through thegut- brain axis. This paper reviews the progress of probiotics on Alzheimer’s disease at home and abroad in recent years, as well as its potential mechanism of prevention and treatment.Key words:probiotics; Alzheimer’s disease; gut microbiota; mechanism阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer’s disease, AD),系中枢神经系统退行性疾病,属于老年期痴呆常见类型,临床特征主要包括:记忆力减退、认知功能障碍、行为改变、焦虑和抑郁等。
默克瞄准肿瘤新药,爱必妥®再添适应症,全国数百家医院可⽤作者:雷公来源:健识局(jianshiju01)全⽂3677字,阅读需10分钟德国默克公司旗下西妥昔单抗注射液(商品名:爱必妥®)获批的新适应症近期已在全国同步上市。
健识局获悉,此次爱必妥®所获批的适应症是:与铂类和氟尿嘧啶化疗联合,⽤于⼀线治疗复发和/或转移性头颈部鳞癌。
这也是继爱必妥®获批⼀线治疗RAS基因野⽣型转移性结直肠癌后,再添⼜⼀临床适应症。
按照默克中国⽣物业务董事总经理罗杰仁的设想,预计在5 年之后,实现改变4000万中国患者⽣命的⽬标。
他告诉健识局,中国是默克全球的战略市场之⼀,公司希望能够帮助中国更多的患者延长⽣存时间,改善⽣活质量。
此番爱必妥®的获批,不仅填补了中国头颈部鳞癌领域靶向治疗的空⽩,更为关键的是,默克已吹响了全⾯进军肿瘤领域的号⾓。
5⽉29⽇,默克公司在美国临床肿瘤学会年会(ASCO)上公布了多款肿瘤创新产品的临床试验阶段性成果,例如⼝服MET抑制剂Tepotinib的VISION研究以及新⼀代PD-L1抑制剂Avelumab的JAVELIN Bladder 100研究,结果均取得了重⼤突破性的进展。
随着中国医药市场药品审评审批不断加速,默克将扩⼤现有肿瘤治疗药物的可及性,以及⼀系列丰富的在研创新产品管线,以应对癌症的挑战,满⾜未被满⾜的治疗需求。
罗杰仁认为,中国的医药政策环境、监管环境和商业环境的发展变化将为医药企业的发展释放巨⼤潜⼒。
在未来10年甚⾄更长时间,中国医疗⾏业的“创新驱动发展”战略将会持续。
爱必妥®新添适应症国内已覆盖200-300家医院据相关数据显⽰,2020年全球头颈部肿瘤(包含⿐咽癌)患者⼈数预计将达到83.3万例。
在中国,头颈部肿瘤的发病率和死亡率均排名第七位,其中90%以上的病理类型为鳞癌。
相对于其他⾼发癌症类型,头颈肿瘤在中国的知晓率并不是很⾼。
Editorial Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, Vol. 20, No. 13 1621EditorialComplexity against Complexity: Multitarget Drugs Since the formulation of the metaphor of drugs as “magic bullets” by Paul Ehrlich at the beginning of the 20th century the concept of effective and safe drugs as those compounds displaying an exquisite selectivity toward a specific individual disease-causing biological target and the resulting “one molecule – one target – one disease” philosophy remains the dominant para-digm in drug discovery. Undoubtedly, this approach has derived successful drugs, but many drug candidates that specifically hit a particular molecular target involved in the underlying mechanisms of a disease have resulted less effective or safe than ex-pected. Indeed, an ever-increasing rate of failure during late-stage clinical development of selective single-target drug candi-dates is due to lack of clinical efficacy and safety, thus challenging this paradigm.Many common diseases such as cancer or cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurodegenerative diseases do not result from a single disease-causing molecular abnormality but from multiple molecular defects. Moreover, living systems are characterized by an interconnected network of multiple molecular components possessing inherent robustness against perturbations and re-dundancy, which make available alternative compensatory signaling pathways to bypass the modulation of an individual target of the network by a drug, thus leaving it without effect. The complexity, robustness, and compensatory mechanisms of a patho-logical network structure might be more successfully tackled through a more complex pharmacological approach than a single-target drug strategy, namely a therapeutic intervention aimed at modulating simultaneously the activity of multiple targets of the complex disease network. Polypharmacology is thus emerging as a powerful alternative paradigm in drug discovery. Multi-target therapies are intended to address the complex biological network of human disease instead of an individual molecular target thereof, which should result in improved clinical efficacy and safety, and hopefully, in a lower clinical attrition.In the first three review articles of this issue, the rationale behind the polypharmacological or multitarget approach to drug discovery will be addressed in terms of multiple modulation of disease network structures and the different types of polyphar-macological interventions will be presented. Viayna et al. open the issue with a claim for the use of multitarget vs. single-target therapies not only as a more efficacious and safer, but also as a more realistic way to treat human disease [1]. The most classi-cal versions of multitarget therapies, i.e. drug cocktails and fixed-dose combinations, are originally discussed by Wertheimer from a historical and economical perspective [2], whereas Bolognesi very critically discusses the advantages of single-molecule multitarget drugs over the previously presented multi-drug approaches [3].The two main procedures for discovering multitarget drugs, i.e. multipotency screening for known drugs and rational design of novel multitarget drugs, will be elaborated in the following review articles. An increasing body of evidence indicates that an unforeseen multitarget profile is a key factor to the efficacy of a number of marketed drugs. Given the multitarget profile seren-dipitously found for many approved drugs, in most cases in a retrospective manner, and the clear clinical interest of multitarget drugs, recent efforts are being made to develop in silico methodologies which make it possible to predict new biological targets for known drugs as a way for discovering multitarget drugs and for finding new therapeutic applications of existing drugs. Re-cent progresses in these in silico methods are discussed by Liu et al. [4]. Screening or prediction of the multitarget profile of known drugs is a very interesting and profitable practice. However, most efforts in multitarget drug discovery are devoted to the rational design of new agents by combination into a single molecule of different pharmacophoric moieties (molecular hy-bridization or framework combination strategy), to enable the new molecules to simultaneously hit different molecular targets. Geldenhuys and Van der Schyf report on multitarget compounds that bear polycyclic cage, thiazolidinedione, stilbene, xan-thine, coumarin or chromone scaffolds, among others, which exhibit original combinations of activities of interest for the treat-ment of neurodegenerative diseases [5]. Chen and Decker review the rational design of novel multitarget compounds to treat central nervous system disorders, which contain one or more pharmacophoric moieties derived from natural products [6], whereas Russo et al. in their review focus on some inherently multitarget natural products, present in plants mainly of the gen-era Crocus, Gingkgo, Salvia and Huperzia, which are of interest for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [7]. Chemotherapy of cancer and infectious diseases is an area where multitarget drugs can be particularly interesting, especially to overcome drug resistance that is undermining the clinical effectiveness of traditionally used drugs. Chen et al. describe the combination of dif-ferent pharmacophoric moieties, mainly derived from the quinazoline, phenylaminopyrimidine, anthracycline and naph-thalimide scaffolds, into novel anticancer compounds endowed with particular combinations of activities [8]. Mbugua Njogu and Chibale systematically review the rational design of hybrid compounds against the major protozoan infections of humans, namely malaria, Chagas disease, human African trypanosomiasis, and leishmaniasis [9]. Finally, Zhan and Liu report on the discovery of novel multitarget anti-HIV agents by rational framework combination approaches, but also through in silico meth-ods and serendipity screening [10]. The use of natural product-derived pharmacophoric motifs in multitarget drug design is again considered by Bisi et al. in the cardiovascular arena [11]. This issue closes with a comprehensive review by Hwang et al. on the three pathways of the arachidonic acid cascade, namely the cyclooxygenase, the lipoxygenase, and the cytochrome P450/soluble epoxide hydrolase pathways, and their crosstalk as the rational basis for the design of multitarget drugs against eicosanoid driven inflammation and pain [12].1622 Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, Vol. 20, No. 13EditorialWe are witnessing a gradual shift toward a multitarget therapeutic approach both in industry and academy, although re-search interests of big pharmaceutical companies are still mainly focusing on the single-target drug discovery paradigm. I hope that this Hot Topic issue of Current Medicinal Chemistry may not only contribute to spreading the benefits, but also the chal-lenges, of developing multitarget drugs with the hope that such strategy become commonplace in pharmaceutical industry and finally in medical practice.REFERENCES[1] Viayna, E.; Sola, I.; Di Pietro, O.; Muñoz-Torrero, D. Human disease and drug pharmacology, complex as real life. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20,1623-1634.[2] Wertheimer, A.I. The economics of polypharmacology: Fixed dose combinations and drug cocktails. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1635-1638.[3] Bolognesi, M.L. Polypharmacology in a single drug: multitarget drugs. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1639-1645.[4] Liu, X.; Zhu, F.; Ma, X.H.; Shi, Z.; Yang, S.Y.; Wei, Y.Q.; Chen, Y.Z. Predicting targeted polypharmacology for drug repositioning and multi-targetdrug discovery. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1646-1661.[5] Geldenhuys, W.J.; Van der Schyf, C.J. Rationally designed multi-targeted agents against neurodegenerative diseases. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20,1662-1672.[6] Chen, X.; Decker, M. Multi-target compounds acting in the central nervous system designed from natural products. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1673-1685.[7] Russo, P.; Frustaci, A.; Fini, M.; Cesario, A. Multitarget drugs of plants origin acting on Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1686-1693.[8] Chen, Z.; Han, L.; Xu, M.; Xu, Y.; Qian, X. Rationally designed multitarget anticancer agents. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1694-1714.[9] Mbugua Njogu, P.; Chibale, K. Recent developments in rationally designed multitarget antiprotozoan agents. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1715-1742.[10] Zhan, P.; Liu, X. Rationally designed multitarget anti-HIV agents. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1743-1758.[11] Bisi, A.; Gobbi, S.; Belluti, F.; Rampa, A. Design of multifunctional compounds for cardiovascular disease: from natural scaffolds to “classical” multi-target approach. Curr. Med. Chem., 2013, 20, 1759-1782.[12] Hwang, S.H.; Wecksler, A.T.; Wagner, K.; Hammock, B.D. Rationally designed multitarget agents against inflammation and pain. Curr. Med. Chem.,2013, 20, 1783-1799.Diego Muñoz-TorreroGuest EditorLaboratori de Química Farmacèutica, Facultat de FarmàciaUniversitat de BarcelonaAv. Diagonal 643, E-08028-BarcelonaSpainTel: +34-93-4024533Fax +34-93-4035941E-mail: dmunoztorrero@。
达格列净在2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病中的应用效果戴彧君① 曹芳① 吉惠① 佘艳军① 【摘要】 目的:探讨达格列净在2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病中的治疗效果。
方法:选取2021年1月—2022年1月云南省滇南中心医院收治的106例2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者,使用随机数字表法将其分为观察组(n=53)及对照组(n=53)。
对照组接受氯沙坦治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用达格列净。
对比两组治疗总有效率、肾功能指标、血糖水平及血管内皮功能指标。
结果:观察组的治疗总有效率(94.34%)高于对照组(81.13%)(P<0.05)。
治疗前,两组的血尿素氮(BUN)、血清肌酐(Scr)、尿白蛋白排泄率(UAER)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)及肌酐清除率(Ccr)水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组的BUN、Scr及24 h UAER较治疗前均降低,且观察组均低于对照组(P<0.05);GFR及Ccr较治疗前均升高,且观察组均高于对照组(P<0.05)。
治疗前,两组的空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血管紧张素Ⅱ(AngⅡ)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、内皮素-1(ET-1)水平相比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组的上述指标较治疗前均降低,且观察组均低于对照组(P<0.05)。
结论:达格列净联合氯沙坦可显著改善2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者的肾功能、降低血糖水平,优化血管内皮功能,效果显著。
【关键词】 2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病 氯沙坦 达格列净 肾功能 Application Effect of Dapagflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complicated with Chronic KidneyDisease/DAI Yujun, CAO Fang, JI Hui, SHE Yanjun. //Medical Innovation of China, 2023, 20(33): 025-029 [Abstract] Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of Dapagflozin in type 2 diabetes mellituscomplicated with chronic kidney disease. Method: A total of one hundred and six patients with type 2 diabetesmellitus complicated with chronic kidney disease admitted to Southern Central Hospital of Yunnan Province fromJanuary 2021 to January 2022 were selected, and divided into observation group (n=53) and control group (n=53)using the random number table method. The control group was treated with Losartan, and the observation groupwas treated with Dapagflozin on the basis of the control group. The total effective rate of treatment, renal functionindicators , blood glucose level and vascular endothelial function indicators of the two groups were compared.Result: The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group (94.34%) was higher than that in the controlgroup (81.13%) (P<0.05). Before treatment, the levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (Scr), urinaryalbumin excretion rate (UAER), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) were notsignificantly different between the two groups (P>0.05); after treatment, BUN, Scr and 24 h UAER in both groupswere decreased compared with those before treatment, and those in the observation group were lower than those inthe control group (P<0.05), the GFR and Ccr were both increased compared with those before treatment, and thosein the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Before treatment, the levels of fastingplasma glucose (FPG), 2 h postprandial blood glucose (2 h PG), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), angiotensinⅡ(AngⅡ), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) were not significantly differentbetween the two groups (P>0.05); after treatment, all above indicators in both groups were reduced compared withthose before treatment, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion: Dapagflozin combined with losartan can significantly improve renal function, reduce blood glucoselevels and optimize vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with chronickidney disease, with significant effects.①云南省滇南中心医院(云南省红河州第一人民医院) 云南 蒙自 661100通信作者:佘艳军- 25 - 糖尿病是临床常见的慢性疾病,其中2型糖尿病是其主要类型。
2024年苯甲酸利扎曲坦市场策略引言本文旨在介绍苯甲酸利扎曲坦的市场策略。
苯甲酸利扎曲坦是一种治疗特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)的药物。
通过分析市场需求、竞争状况和潜在机会,本文将提供有关2024年苯甲酸利扎曲坦市场策略的详细信息。
市场需求分析ITP是一种免疫性血液疾病,其中人体的免疫系统错误地攻击血小板,导致血小板减少和出血倾向。
苯甲酸利扎曲坦是一种促进血小板增加的药物,已被证明在治疗ITP患者中非常有效。
目前,全球范围内ITP患者数量不断增加,市场需求逐渐增加。
苯甲酸利扎曲坦作为一种有效的治疗方法,受到医生和患者的广泛关注和接受。
竞争分析目前,苯甲酸利扎曲坦市场存在一些竞争对手。
其中一些竞争对手是传统的药物治疗方法,如肾上腺皮质激素。
而另一些竞争对手是其他新型治疗方法,如静脉免疫球蛋白。
然而,苯甲酸利扎曲坦具有一些优势,可以使其在竞争中脱颖而出。
首先,苯甲酸利扎曲坦对ITP患者的疗效高。
其次,苯甲酸利扎曲坦具有较少的副作用和更好的耐受性。
这些优势使得医生和患者更倾向于选择苯甲酸利扎曲坦作为ITP治疗的首选药物。
市场定位和目标受众苯甲酸利扎曲坦的市场定位是作为一种高效、安全的ITP治疗药物。
目标受众是ITP患者和医生。
针对患者,我们通过多种渠道传播苯甲酸利扎曲坦的信息,包括医院宣传和在线健康平台等。
我们将强调苯甲酸利扎曲坦的优势,如高疗效和良好的耐受性,以吸引患者选择该药物治疗ITP。
对于医生,我们将进行学术推广和会议宣传,在医学界传播苯甲酸利扎曲坦的临床数据和优势。
通过与医生的密切合作,我们将提供培训和教育,以确保他们对药物的正确应用和患者的有效治疗。
市场推广策略为了达到市场推广的目标,我们将采取以下策略:1.多渠道宣传:通过医院宣传、电视广告、网络媒体等多种渠道传播苯甲酸利扎曲坦的信息。
2.学术推广:参加相关学术会议,发表研究论文,增加苯甲酸利扎曲坦的知名度和认可度。
3.医生教育:提供全面的培训和教育,确保医生了解苯甲酸利扎曲坦的临床应用和患者选择该药物的决策。
thernostics under reviewTitle: Understanding and Analyzing the Role of TheragnosticsIntroduction:Theragnostics, an emerging field in medicine, combines therapeutics and diagnostics to provide personalized treatment options for patients. It revolutionizes the healthcare industry by tailoring treatment plans for individuals based on their unique genetic makeup, disease characteristics, and response to treatment. This article aims to explore the concept, development, challenges, and potential applications of theragnostics.I. Defining Theragnostics:Theragnostics, often referred to as theranostics, is a fusion of therapeutics and diagnostics. It encompasses the integration of diagnostic tools, such as medical imaging and biomarker analysis, with targeted therapy interventions. By integrating diagnosis and therapy, theragnostics ensures a more precise and individualized approach to healthcare.II. Evolution of Theragnostics:The concept of theragnostics can be traced back to the late 1990swhen researchers recognized the need for personalized medicine. Advances in genomics, proteomics, and imaging techniques laid the groundwork for the development of theragnostics. It was a paradigm shift from the traditional one-size-fits-all approach to a patient-centric model.III. Key Diagnostic Modalities in Theragnostics:a. Medical Imaging: Various imaging techniques, including positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are used to visualize and diagnose diseases. Imaging agents tagged with radioisotopes or paramagnetic substances enable accurate detection and localization of targets for subsequent therapy.b. Biomarkers: These are molecular indicators that provide specific information about a disease or its response to treatment. Biomarkers play a vital role in tailoring therapies for patients.IV. Therapeutic Approaches in Theragnostics:a. Targeted Drug Delivery: Theragnostics helps in delivering drugs directly to tumor sites, minimizing side effects. This is achieved through nanoparticles, liposomes, or antibody-drug conjugates, which are designed to specifically recognize and delivertherapeutics to diseased tissues.b. Radiopharmaceutical Therapy: Radioactive isotopes are attached to specific molecules, which selectively target cancer cells. Once targeted, the radioactive isotopes emit radiation, killing or damaging cancer cells while sparing healthy tissues.V. Challenges in Theragnostics:a. Regulatory Approval: Developing and validating tests, imaging agents, and therapeutic compounds is a complex process that requires regulatory approval. Ensuring accuracy, safety, and efficacy of theragnostics is essential for widespread adoption.b. Cost and Affordability: Theragnostics, being a relatively new and advanced field, can be expensive. Widespread adoption may be hindered due to high costs, especially in resource-constrained settings.c. Technology Integration: Integration of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches requires coordination between different disciplines, including radiology, pathology, and pharmaceuticals. Coordinated efforts are essential for seamless implementation and realization of its potential.VI. Potential Applications:a. Cancer Treatment: Theragnostics plays a crucial role in identifying tumor markers, determining response to treatment, and providing targeted therapy options. It aids in monitoring treatment response and adjusting therapies accordingly.b. Neurological Disorders: Theragnostics has the potential to help in early diagnosis and monitoring the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. It enables targeted drug delivery to specific brain regions, minimizing off-target effects.c. Cardiovascular Diseases: By identifying high-risk patients, tracking disease progression, and providing personalized treatment plans, theragnostics can significantly impact cardiovascular healthcare.Conclusion:Theragnostics represents an innovative approach revolutionizing personalized medicine. By integrating diagnostics with targeted therapeutics, theragnostics provides valuable opportunities for accurate disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Further research, technological advancements, and widespread adoption are necessary for maximizing its potential and improving patient outcomes.。
CONTENTSsummary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .275 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .275 Targets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .276 references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .281SUMMARYAntimalarial drugs unequivocally reduce mortality in patients with fal-ciparum malaria. However, they have proven ineffective in some patients with severe disease, in whom a tipping point has been breached and a rampant systemic inflammatory response has begun that overwhelms host control mechanisms. Unabated, this immune response triggers a chain of pathological events, compounded by the parasite’s presence and immunomodulatory capacity, which often results in death. Host-directed adjunctive therapies, that is therapies administered in combination with an antiparasitic agent that are designed to prevent these pathological processes, are considered the only way to reduce morbidity and mortality, but none has yet demon-strated absolute efficacy in clinical trials. In this review, we present the key targets of adjunctive therapies for the management of severe cere-bral malaria.Key words:severe malaria – cerebral malaria – Plasmodium falci-parum– Drug targets – Immunomodulation – Immunopathogenesis INTRODUCTIONMalaria is an infectious disease caused by obligate intracellular pro-tozoa of the genus Plasmodium. It is transmitted from person to per-son through the bite of a female Anopheles mosquito. of the five species of plasmodia that are known to infect humans, Plasmodium falciparum is the most highly pathogenic. It causes only about half of all malaria infections, but 91% of its deaths. In 2010 alone, it was responsible for almost 600,000 patients, the vast majority of whom were in sub-saharan africa, where falciparum malaria is directly responsible for 1 in 5 childhood deaths and indirectly contributes to morbidity and mortality from anemia, respiratory infections, diarrhea and malnutrition (1, 2).In individuals without naturally acquired immunity, P. falciparum infection is almost always symptomatic, and clinical symptoms can develop even at very low parasitemias. Without prompt treatment with specific drugs, the disease rapidly progresses to a severe illness that is frequently fatal (mortality is conservatively estimated at 30%) (3). Even with appropriate treatment, mortality rates in naive individ-uals are between 0.6% and 3.8%, and for severe malaria they may exceed 20%, even when managed in intensive care units (4).In areas of intense transmission, children gradually acquire immuni-ty that protects them against high parasitemia and the risk of severe disease. Immunity is generally acquired by the onset of puberty, after which severe disease rarely occurs. sterilizing immunity, however, is never fully achieved and adults remain asymptomatic carriers of par-asites (3).symptoms of falciparum malaria usually develop 11 days after an infectious bite (range: 6-14 days), although parasites can be detect-ed in the blood after 10 days (range: 5-10 days). Patients generally present with fever (92% of cases), chills (79%), headache (70%) and diaphoresis (64%). clinical deterioration to severe malaria usually occurs 3-7 days after the onset of fever (4). children commonly develop severe anemia and hypoglycemia, while adults tend to pres-ent with jaundice and progress to renal failure and respiratory dis-tress due to pulmonary edema (5). about 7% of P. falciparum malar-ia cases develop cerebral malaria (6). cerebral malaria is caused only by P. falciparum and is responsible for up to 40% of the mortal-ity attributable to severe malaria (7). Initial symptoms of brain involvement include acute headache, irritability, agitation and psy-chosis. seizures occur in 80% of children, but only 15-20% of adults. The onset of coma is rapid in children, but only gradual in adults, and can last several hours to several days (8). generally, the deeper the coma, the worse the prognosis (4). If the patient survives, neuro-logical sequelae (e.g., movement disorders, paralysis, difficulty in walking, speech impairment, blindness, deafness, epilepsy, mental disorders and behavioral abnormalities) are present in 6-29% of children and 3-10% of adults (8). Mortality from cerebral malaria ranges from 10-50%, even with treatment (4).since 2011, the World health organization (Who) has advocated intravenous artesunate for the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in both children and adults (9), based on the results of two multicenter randomized trials (10, 11).Drugs of the Future 2014, 39(4): 275-286copyright © 2014 Prous science, s.a.U. or its licensors. all rights reserved.ccc: 0377-8282/20014DoI: 10.1358/dof.2014.39.4.2141023TargETs To WaTchThEraPEUTIc TargETs For MaLarIa: aDJUNcTIVE ThEraPIEsA.E. Brown and L.A. SorberaThomson reuters, Barcelona, spainCorrespondence:E-mail: lisa.sorbera@.although these trials showed that artesunate offered a significant survival advantage over its predecessor quinine (relative reduction in mortality of 22.5% for african children and 34.7% for southeast asian adults), death rates remained high (8.5% in children and 14.7% in adults), and neither trial reported any impact in preventing the development of neurological sequelae. It is clear then that even using the best available antiparasitic agents under optimum trial conditions, targeting the parasite alone is not sufficient to prevent the high mortality associated with severe disease.severe and cerebral malaria are now thought of as multisystem dis-orders that develop as a result of the host’s response to P. falciparum infection —death occurs as a consequence of infection rather than because of it. adjunctive therapies administered in combination with antimalarial drugs, which are designed to specifically block these pathological events, may be the only means of reducing morbidity and mortality, but none have demonstrated unequivocal efficacy in clinical trials (reviewed in references 8and 12).The pathogenesis of malaria depends on various host and parasite factors, and on interactions between the parasite and its host’s immune system throughout its life cycle (Figure 1). The ultimate out-come of the disease, and whether severe and cerebral malaria devel-ops, is a fine balance between the beneficial and harmful effects of these immune responses.Infection starts with a bite of an infected mosquito, when the motile sporozoite is introduced into the skin together with mosquito saliva. The sporozoite enters the bloodstream and is rapidly carried to the liver, where it invades a hepatocyte. Parasite development in the liver goes largely unnoticed and causes little or no pathology. During this phase of its life cycle, the parasite actively exports proteins across the vacuolar membrane into the cytosol and nucleus of the hepatocyte, which modulate host gene expression and create a favorable environment for its development. Within the hepatocyte, merozoites develop and are released into the bloodstream within a host cell-derived cloak, the merosome, which largely hides them from immune recognition (13). P. falciparum is unique among human malaria parasites because it uses multiple, often functionally redun-dant, host cell receptors to invade red blood cells (rBcs) of any age (14). Plasmodium parasites export hundreds of remodeling and viru-lence proteins into the erythrocyte in order to establish and maintain infection (15, 16). over the course of 48 hours, each parasite actively consumes intracellular proteins to produce 8-32 daughter mero-zoites (average of 10) that develop within a membrane-derived com-partment, the parasitophorous vacuole, which is established during the invasion process. These merozoites must destroy their host cell in order to gain access to fresh rBcs and perpetuate the infection. Lysis of the rBc releases hundreds of parasite products, some of which (i.e., the glycosylphosphatidylinositol [gPI] anchor or hemo-zoin [hZ; malaria toxin], a detoxified crystalline form of heme pro-duced by the parasite following the catabolism of hemoglobin) orchestrate the release of proinflammatory and pyrogenic cytokines, (i.e., TNF-α, interleukin-6 [IL-6] and IL-1) (17-21). These cytokines ini-tially serve to control parasitemia and are responsible for the symp-toms of mild malaria: headache, chills, fever and lethargy (22). subsequent activation of cD4+T cells and natural killer (NK) cells triggers further cytokine production (i.e., interferon-γ[IFN-γ]), which activates macrophages and induces the infiltration of immune cells (i.e., neutrophils, monocytes and cD8+T cells) that precipitate para-site clearance and permit the development of immunological mem-ory for subsequent infection (23, 24). however, during a severe malarial infection, the enormous parasite load can overwhelm the capacity of the mononuclear phagocyte system to eliminate it and circulating immune cells become hyperactivated and release large amounts of proinflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12 and IL-18). Macrophages and dendritic cells also become laden with indigestible material (i.e., hemozoin), which impinges upon their ability to act as antigen-presenting cells (aPcs) (25). Thus, the excessive production of cytokines without appropriate reg-ulatory controls (i.e., well-developed antibody responses, downreg-ulation of cytotoxic immune mechanisms and regulatory cytokine production) induces multiple pathological changes in host tissues that Plasmodium exploits to perpetuate the development of severe pathology (26-31).Proinflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNF-α, IFN-γand IL-6) induce the upregulation of cell adhesion molecules (i.e., intercellular adhesion molecule 1 [IcaM-1], cD36, vascular cell adhesion protein 1 [VcaM-1] and E- and P-selectin [32-36]) on endothelial cells that mediate the binding and sequestration of rBcs via PfEMP1(37-41). PfEMP1 is inserted into the erythrocyte membrane by the parasite during this stage of its life cycle as a survival mechanism to prevent the removal of parasitized erythrocytes (PEs) by the spleen (42, 43). It can also induce the formation of clusters of uninfected rBcs (termed rosettes) within the bloodstream. The sequestration of rBcs in the microvasculature of organs is one of the key pathogenic drivers of severe, cerebral and pregnancy-associated malaria (44-53). Parasite sequestration and local inflammation lead to endothelial activation and dysfunction, and cause disruption to the blood−brain barrier (54), that may be sufficient to perturb vital organ function and allow metabolites to impair consciousness or induce seizures (8).here, we review the therapeutic targets of adjunctive therapies for the treatment of severe and cerebral malaria (including targets under active development, as well as candidate and investigational targets). Figure 2 depicts these targets in the context of disease pathology. Table I provides a selection of patents for selected tar-gets.TARGETSToll-like receptor 9 (TLR9)TLr9 is an intracellular pattern recognition receptor that plays a key role in innate immune responses to Plasmodium infection. It specifi-cally recognizes non-methylated cytosine-guanosine (cpg) motifs that are common to viral and bacterial genomes but largely absent from those of vertebrates, in whom cpg dinucleotides are highly methylated (55). Despite being extremely aT rich, the P. falciparum genome comprises multiple cpg B-class motifs in subtelomeric regions (56). It also contains a number of non-cpg motifs (5’-aTTTTTac-3’) that have been shown to activate TLr9 signaling (56, 57). Both hemozoin (19, 56, 58) and parasite nucleosomes have been implicated as sources of these signals (59, 60).TLr9 is expressed only on B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDcs) (61). In resting cells, it resides within the endoplasmic reticu-ThEraPEUTIc TargETs For MaLarIa: aDJUNcTIVE ThEraPIEs A.E. Brown and L.A. SorberaA.E. Brown and L.A. Sorbera ThEraPEUTIc TargETs For MaLarIa: aDJUNcTIVE ThEraPIEsFigure 1.The life cycle of Plasmodium falciparum and its interplay with the host immune system. Plasmodium parasites are transmitted to a vertebrate host following the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito. The majority of sporozoites remain in the dermis trapped by antibodies; however, a small propor-tion are able to enter blood capillaries or lymph vessels, from which they are carried to lymph nodes and prime T and B cells, or to the liver. sporozoites typi-cally take 15-30 minutes to migrate from the skin to the liver, and after initially passing through Kupffer cells, they enter hepatocytes. here, the parasite devel-ops and multiplies within a host cell-derived vacuole the merosome that protects them from immune recognition. During this period the parasite also releases proteins that interfere with host cell ribosome function and inhibit hepatocyte death and prevent killing by cD4+and cD8+T cells, thereby promoting mero-some survival. after ~8 days, the parasite induces its host hepatocyte death and merozoites are released into the bloodstream. Each merozoite invades an ery-throcyte within 30 seconds of being released and undergoes a period of growth and multiplication to produce a schizont. after ~48 hours, the red blood cell (rBc) ruptures and releases 8-32 merozoites, which are freed to invade new erythrocytes and repeat the erythrocytic cycle. rBc lysis also releases parasite protein, DNa and metabolites (i.e., glycosylphosphatidylinositol [gPI], hemozoin, nucleosome) that are recognized by Toll-like receptors (TLrs) (i.e., TLr9 and TLr2) on dendritic cells, and stimulates the production of proinflammatory and pyrogenic cytokines. These cytokines direct Th1 cD4+T cell differentiation and promote the development of antibody responses to merozoite surface proteins or parasite proteins (i.e., PfEMP1) that are expressed on the surface of erythro-cytes during their intracellular development. IFN-γexpression by cD4+cells also activates macrophages that phagocytose and kill opsonized merozoites or parasitized erythrocytes. Local cytokine production also induces the expression of adhesion molecules (e.g., IcaM-1) on endothelial cells to which PfEMP1 expressed on parasitized erythrocytes (PEs) binds in order to prevent their clearance by the spleen. after a number of intraerythrocytic cycles, a proportion of merozoites terminally differentiate into gametocytes and are acquired by the mosquito upon blood-feeding. Within the mosquito they undergo their sexual developmental, which produces fresh sporozoites ready to initiate a new cycle of infection after approximately 9-12 days.ThEraPEUTIc TargETs For MaLarIa: aDJUNcTIVE ThEraPIEs A.E. Brown and L.A. Sorbera Figure 2.Malaria: adjunctive Therapy Targetscape. a diagram showing an overall cellular and molecular landscape or comprehensive network of connections among the current therapeutic targets for malarial adjunctive therapy and their biological actions. gray or lighter symbols are targets that are not validated (i.e., targets not associated with a product that is currently under active development for malarial adjunctive therapy). abbreviations: BBB, blood-brain barri-er; gPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; 15-hETE, 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid; 13-hoDE, 13-(S)-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid; hMgB1, high mobility group box protein 1; IcaM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; IL, interleukin; NF-κB, nuclear factor NF-kappa-B; PParγ,peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; rhoa, ras homolog gene family, member a; rocK, rho-associated protein kinase (nonspecified subtype); ros, reactive oxygen species; sIL-6r, sol-uble interleukin 6 receptor; TLr, Toll-like receptor.lum, but upon stimulation translocates to the site of cellular cpg-DNa uptake, the endosome, where signal transduction is initiated via myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), an adaptor molecule shared by all TLrs (62). TLr9 stimulation induces the expression of type I IFNs (i.e., IFN-αand IFN-β) (63, 64) and cytokines and chemokines (i.e., IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α) with a predominately T helper 1 (Th1) profile (65). a number of single nucleotide polymor-phisms (sNPs) in the promoter region of TLr9 have been identified that modulate disease outcome and cytokine expression profiles during severe malarial infections (66-70). It also upregulates the expression of co-stimulatory molecules (i.e., cD40, B7-1 [cD80], B7-2 [cD86]) and Mhc class II on pDcs and B cells that promote the expansion of cD8+cytotoxic T lymphocytes (cTLs) and Th1 cD4+T cells (71), and induces the differentiation of pDcs into aPcs capable of inducing effector/memory cD8+T-cell responses (72); TLr9 is central to the development of protective immunity to malaria in ani-mal models (73) and naive humans (74).activation of TLr9 on pDcs induces the production of cD4+cD25+T regulatory (Treg) cells that are capable of suppressing naive T cell differentiation (75). It is a mechanism Plasmodium exploits for immune evasion (76-78), where rapid parasite growth correlates with the upregulation of Tregs during infection in humans (79).TLr9 has been implicated in both the initiation (73,80,81) and the perpetuation of the immune response to Plasmodium(82,83); the cytokine milieu (i.e., IFN-γand IL-12) released during Plasmodium infection is proposed to prime TLr immune responses that can lead to deleterious hyperinflammation upon their subsequent reactivation. consistent with this, TLR9−/−mice are partially protect-ed from lethal lipopolysaccharide-induced shock during infection with the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi (80). The small-molecule antagonist E-6446 confers even greater protection (86% survival vs. 38% for TLR9−/−mice) and can significantly improve survival of mice following infection with the murine malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. It can also prevent the development of cerebral malaria, even when administered to mice with established disease (i.e., 3-6 days post-infection) but not in those already exhibiting cerebral pathology (i.e., > 6 days post-infection) (84).A.E. Brown and L.A. Sorbera ThEraPEUTIc TargETs For MaLarIa: aDJUNcTIVE ThEraPIEsanother potential TLr9 antagonist is chloroquine. chloroquine is an inhibitor of endosomal acidification and blocks the TLr9-cpg-DNa interaction and attenuates TLr9-mediated signal transduction (85),albeit with an eightfold lower Ic50than E-6446 (mean Ic50= 0.01 vs.0.08 mM) (84). It has successfully been used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (ra) and systemic lupus erythromatosus (sLE) and canTable II. selected patents for targets being pursued or explored as adjunctive therapies for malaria (from Thomson reuters Integrity sM).ThEraPEUTIc TargETs For MaLarIa: aDJUNcTIVE ThEraPIEs A.E. Brown and L.A. Sorberaattenuate proinflammatory cytokine release in mice with sepsis (86). It may be worth reconsidering chloroquine for the treatment of severe malaria, not for its anti-parasitic activity, which is compro-mised anyway because of resistance, but for its adjuvant effect. It has, like E-664, however, proven ineffective in preventing the devel-opment of cerebral malaria in late-stage disease (87).Interleukin-6 (IL-6)IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine and one of the earliest secreted by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMcs) (88, 89) following TLr-mediated recognition of Plasmodium-specific patterns like gPI and parasite DNa (84, 89). IL-6 plays a key role in controlling parasite density (90) by promoting monocyte recruitment (91,92). hyperparasitemia is associated with significantly lower levels of IL-6 (27), and polymorphisms in the promoter of IL-6 have been associat-ed with the relative resistance and significantly lower parasite rates of the Fulani people of Mali and Burkina Faso (93, 94), compared to other sympatric ethnic groups (95). IL-6 also induces IL-21 produc-tion, which promotes the differentiation of B helper cD4+T cells (96, 97), which are necessary for the proper development of anti-Plasmodium antibody responses (98-100).IL-6 exerts its biological activity through two molecules: IL-6r (IL-6 receptor) and membrane glycoprotein 130 (gp130). mIL-6r (mem-brane-bound IL-6r) is expressed on the surface of hepatocytes and leukocytes (i.e., neutrophils, macrophages and some T cells) and mediates IL-6 classic signaling (101). a soluble form of IL-6r (sIL-6r) is also found in serum and mediates IL-6 trans-signaling. sIL-6r is produced by proteolytic cleavage (“shedding”) of the ectodomain of mIL-6r by aDaM 10 and aDaM 17 (102-104) and can bind free IL-6r and activate any gp130 (gp130 is expressed on the surface of most cells). When IL-6 binds to IL-6r, it stimulates the homodimerization of gp130 and induces the JaK/sTaT3 and ras/ErK/c/EBP path-ways (105). a soluble form of gp130, sgp130, is also found in serum and is believed to antagonize the bioactivity of IL-6 by blocking the soluble IL-6–IL-6r complex from attaching to membrane-bound gp130 (106).Levels of IL-6 and sIL-6r are increased in patients with severe and cerebral malaria (107) and IL-6 levels correlate with disease severity and mortality (27, 108). Those of sgp130, however, remain unchanged (107), suggesting that aberrant IL-6 trans-signaling may be responsible for the pathogenesis of malaria, as is observed in a number of inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (109), ra (110) and sepsis (111). consistent with this, inhibi-tion of IL-6 using sgp130Fc, a recombinant fusion protein comprising the extracellular domain of gp130 (domains 1-6) fused to human Igg Fc (112), significantly increased survival of mice following lethal P. chabaudi infection (113). IL-6 trans-signaling is presumably initiat-ed following the proteolytic processing of IL-6r from neutrophils recruited to endothelial cells by chemokines (i.e., cXcL1) (83) released following pleural effusion (PE) sequestration. IL-6 trans-signaling would subsequently stimulate endothelial cells to express monocytes (i.e., ccL2/McP-1, ccL8/McP-2, cXcL5/ENa-78 and cXcL6/gcP-2), T cell-attracting chemokines (i.e., ccL4/MIP-1-beta, ccL5/raNTEs, ccL17/Tarc and cXcL10/IP-10) and cell adhesion molecules (i.e., IcaM-1) (114, 115) that would perpetuate the inflam-matory response and amplify PE sequestration, ultimately leading to endothelial dysfunction (116, 117).Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) PPar-γis a ligand-activated transcription factor of the nuclear hor-mone receptor superfamily that modulates metabolic and immune functions. During malaria infection it is probably activated as a homeostatic response in an attempt to attenuate (hyper)inflamma-tion and oxidative stress and prevent its pathological consequences. In a genetic screen in mice to identify genes involved in susceptibili-ty and resistance to P. berghei infection, Pparg was one of only two genes identified in a locus on chromosome 6 that modifies survival and prevents the development of cerebral malaria (118).PPar-γis activated by the hydroxy-polyunsaturated fatty acids 15-hydroxyecosatetraenoic acid (15-hETE) and 13-hydroxyoctadeca-dienoic acid (13-hoDE), which are produced following the interac-tion of Plasmodium hemozoin with membrane phospholipids (119-121). Upon ligand binding, PPar-γforms a heterodimeric complex with the retinoid X receptor that binds to cis-acting peroxisome pro-liferator response elements on DNa to regulate the transcription of target genes (122).PPar-γnormally acts as a transcriptional activator of genes involved in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism (123). however, it can also sequester transcription factors, such as nuclear factor NF-κB, aP-1, c/EBP beta, sTaT1 and NFaT (122), and thereby inhibits the expres-sion of proinflammatory cytokines (124, 125) and prevents the pro-duction of ros by monocytes and macrophages (126). It can also block the expression of IcaM-1 and VcaM-1 (127), and attenuate the expression of inducible proinflammatory proteins in endothelial cells, including cyclooxygenase-2 (coX-2), cytosolic phospholipase a2 (cPLa2) and nitric oxide synthase, inducible (iNos) (126, 128, 129). PPar-γplays a critical role in protecting blood vessels, and interference with PPar-γsignaling produces cerebral arteriolar endothelial dysfunction via a mechanism involving oxidative stress (130). Furthermore, PPar-γagonists have been shown to prevent inflammation and neuronal death after focal cerebral ischemia in rodents (131-135). consistent with this, mice treated with rosiglita-zone were protected from developing cerebral malaria, even when it was administered just prior to the development of cerebral patholo-gy (i.e., 5 days post-infection) (136). rosligitazone also offers bene-fits in addition to its immunomodulatory properties. a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I/IIa trial testing the safety, tolerability and efficacy of rosiglitazone adjunctive therapy in Thai patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria, showed that rosiglitazone in combination with atovaquone/proguanil significant-ly reduced parasite clearance times compared to atovaquone/ proguanil alone (137), probably because of increased phagocytosis as a direct result of PPar-γ-mediated upregulation of the scavenger receptor cD36 on macrophages (136, 138).Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B (NF-κB)NF-κB is a dimeric protein composed of members of the rel family of transcription factors that regulate the expression of many inflam-matory genes. a gene expression analysis of human brain endothe-lium after interaction with P. falciparum revealed that the NF-κB pathway was central to the host response (83).humans express 5 rel/NF-κB proteins (rela/p65, c-rel, rel-B, p50 [NF-κB1] and p52 [NF-κB2]), the specific combination of whichdetermine the specificity of transcriptional activation (139-141). For example, E-selectin (142-144) and VcaM-1 (145, 146) DNa κB sites preferentially bind p50/p65 heterodimers, while the IcaM-1 ele-ment preferentially binds p50/crel heterodimers or c-rel homod-imers (147). In unstimulated cells, the NF-κB complex is sequestered in the cytoplasm by an inhibitory protein, I-κB that masks its C-ter-minal transactivation domain (148, 149). Upon stimulation, NF-κB is activated in a ubiquitin-dependent process which requires the phosphorylation of IκB by IkappaB kinase (IKK) (150, 151). Following degradation of IκB by the 26s proteosome, NF-κB is freed to enter the nucleus and activate the expression of inflammatory mediators (152, 153).as a class of drugs, antioxidants have demonstrated efficacy in pre-venting experimental cerebral malaria (154). (–)-Epigallocatechin gallate (Egcg) is a green tea-derived polyphenol that can regulate NF-κB activation by inhibiting IKK activity (155, 156). The (+)-Egcg enantiomer acts as an inhibitor of cytoadherence. It has a similar structure to the DE loop (Leu42-arg49) of IcaM-1, which is likely to be a key domain in its interaction with PfEMP1 (157, 158), and can block the binding of PEs of field-derived Plasmodium isolates to IcaM-1-Fc in vitro by up to 80% at micromolar concentrations (158)(Ic50= 5-10 mM) (157). Egcg also possesses intrinsic anti-Plasmodium activity and can attenuate sporozoite gliding motility(Ic50= 137 mM) and induce sporozoite death (Ic50= 1,095 mM at 6hours; 118 mM at 12 hours) (159).curcumin, a polyphenol derived from turmeric, binds p50 and inhibits IκBαdegradation following stimulation by IL-1 and TNF-α(160). It can prevent the development of cerebral malaria in mice fol-lowing lethal P. berghei challenge (161).Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTc) is an inhibitor of p50, p52, c-rel and rel-B (162) that can block gPI-induced upregulation of IcaM-1, VcaM-1 and E-selectin on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (hUVEcs) and attenuate parasite cytoadherence (163).N-acetyl-L-cysteine (Nac) is a suppressor of IKKαand IKKβactiva-tion (164) that can protect the brain from free radical injury, apopto-sis and inflammation after focal cerebral ischemia in rodents (165, 166). clinical trials testing its potential as an adjunctive treatment for falciparum malaria, however, have failed to demonstrate any sur-vival benefit (167, 168).Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK)rhoa gTPase is activated upon adherence of PEs to human lung endothelial cells in vitro (169). rhoa is the major activator of actin-myosin contraction in endothelial cells and thereby a key determi-nant of increased endothelial cell permeability (170-172). Endothelial cells line the intima of microvesicles and form a semi-permeable barrier that controls the exchange of macromolecules and fluids between the blood and interstitial space. Precise regula-tion of this barrier is necessary to maintain circulatory homeostasis and proper organ function (173). Postmortem histological studies of adults with cerebral malaria show widespread vascular endothelial cell activation, as evidenced by higher blood levels of angiopoietin-2 (aNg-2) (174) and circulating Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs) (175, 176) and disruption of cell junction proteins, particularly in vessels containing PEs (177).Upon rhoa activation, its effector kinases rocK-I and rocK-II phosphorylate and inhibit myosin light chain phosphatase (MLcP), resulting in a net increase in phosphorylated myosin light chain (MLc) that induces actin–myosin contraction and intracellular gap formation (178). rhoa is activated by some inflammatory agonists released during Plasmodium infection. ros are released by activat-ed neutrophils bound to the vascular endothelium and induce endothelial contraction by activating rhoa directly (178-181). TNF-αis believed to increase barrier permeability directly by activating rhoa (178, 182) and indirectly by upregulating the expression of endothelial adhesion molecules (i.e., IcaM-1 and E-selectin), there-by promoting neutrophil adhesion and ros production at the endothelium (183-185). The rocK inhibitor fasudil (ha-1077) can restore endothelial monolayer integrity and prevent apoptosis in vitro following exposure to PEs or TNF-α(169, 186). It has also been shown to arrest the development of cerebral malaria in mice (161). DISCLOSURESThe authors state no conflicts of interest.Submitted: March 21, 2014. Accepted: April 3, 2014.REFERENCESglobal health observatory Data repository: Malaria 2010. World health 1.organization, geneva, switzerland. available online. accessed 26 January 26, 2013.World Malaria report 2008: World health organization, geneva, 2.switzerland 2008. IsBN: 9789241563697. available online. accessed 26 January 26, 2013.Doolan, D.L., Dobaño, c., Baird, J.K. Acquired immunity to malaria. clin 3.Microbiol rev 2009, 22(1): 13-36.Trampuz, a., Jereb, M., Muzlovic, I., Prabhu, r.M. Clinical review: Severe 4.malaria. crit care 2003, 7(4): 315-23.Perkins, D.J., Were, T., Davenport, g.c., Kempaiah, P., hittner, J.B., 5.ong’echa, J.M. Severe malarial anemia: Innate immunity and pathogene-sis. Int J Biol sci 2011, 7(9): 1427-42.Maitland, K., Newton, c.r. Acidosis of severe falciparum malaria: Heading 6.for a shock?Trends Parasitol 2005, 21(1): 11-6.Severe falciparum malaria. World Health Organization, Communicable 7.Diseases Cluster. Trans r soc Trop Med hyg 2000, 94(suppl. 1): s1-90.Mishra, s.K., Newton, c.r. Diagnosis and management of the neurologi-8.cal complications of falciparum malaria. Nat rev Neurol 2009, 5(4): 189-98.World health organization, guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria, 2nd 9.edition, IsBN: 9789241547925, World health organization geneva 2011.available online. accessed January 27, 2013.Dondorp, a.M., Fanello, c.I., hendriksen, I.c. et al. Artesunate versus qui-10.nine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): An open-label, randomised ncet 2010, 376(9753): 1647-57.Dondorp, a., Nosten, F., stepniewska K. et al. South East Asian Quinine 11.Artesunate Malaria Trial (SEAQUAMAT) group. Artesunate versus quinine for treatment of severe falciparum malaria: A randomised ncet 2005, 366(9487): 717-25.John, c.c., Kutamba, E., Mugarura, K., opoka, r.o. Adjunctive therapy for 12.cerebral malaria and other severe forms of Plasmodium falciparum malar-ia. Expert rev anti Infect Ther 2010, 8(9): 997-1008.A.E. Brown and L.A. Sorbera ThEraPEUTIc TargETs For MaLarIa: aDJUNcTIVE ThEraPIEs。