LSAT考试分析推理题：重点问题

最新LSAT逻辑推理练习题我们都知道一般法学院要求151分，知名的法学院往往要求163分以上。

若申请者的LSAT成绩没有达到一定要求，有些学校甚至不会看其申请材料。

怎么办？我们只能练题来提高自己的分数了，LSAT逻辑推理练习题分享给大家！注意：LSAT考试满分为180分，最低分为120分，其计算方法是根据选择的正确的答案的数目来确定。

总共99-101道，题选对25个左右，分数大概为130分；选对39个左右，分数大概为140分；选对55个，分数大概为150分；选对72个，分数为160；选对87个，分数为170分；选对98个以上，分数为满分180分。

LSAT 逻辑游戏题On Wednesday, a legislator remembers that she must vote on seven bills-defense, environment, free trade, gun control, health care, immigration, and judicial activism-by the end of the week. Because the legislator wants to align herself with a major political party, she will vote on the seven bills in accordance with the following conditions:She votes for the gun control bill only if she votes against the environment bill.Unless she votes against the judicial activism bill, she will vote for the immigration bill.She will vote for either the environment bill, the judicial activism bill, or both.She votes for the gun control bill if she votes for both the health care bill and the defense bill.1. Which one of the following could be a complete and accurate list of the bills the legislator votes against?(A) free trade, gun control, immigration, judicial activism(B) defense, free trade, gun control, health care, immigration(C) free trade, health care, immigration, judicial activism(D) environment, gun control, health care, judicial activism(E) defense, environment, gun control, health care2. If the legislator votes against the judicial activism bill, then which one of the following CANNOT be true?(A) She votes against both the defense bill and the gun control bill.(B) She votes against both the gun control bill and the health care bill.(C) She votes for both the health care bill and the defense bill.(D) She votes for both the health care bill and the environment bill.(E) She votes for both the environment bill and the free trade bill.3. Which one of the following CANNOT be true?(A) The legislator votes for neither the gun control bill nor the immigration bill.(B) The legislator votes for neither the environment bill nor the immigration bill.(C) The legislator votes for neither the gun control bill nor the health care bill.(D) The legislator votes for neither the health care bill nor the free trade bill.(E) The legislator votes for neither the free trade bill nor the immigration bill.4. If the legislator votes against the immigration bill, then which one of the following is the minimum number of the seven bills she must also vote against?(A) one(B) two(C) three(D) four(E) five5. If the legislator votes for the gun control bill, then which one of the following must be true?(A) She votes for the health care bill or the defense bill.(B) She votes against the health care bill or the defense bill.(C) She votes against the judicial activism bill.(D) She votes for the immigration bill.(E) She votes against the immigration bill.6. If the legislator votes against the judicial activism bill, then each of the following could be true EXCEPT:(A) She votes against the health care bill and the defense bill.(B) She votes for the health care bill and the defense bill.(C) She votes against the health care bill and the gun control bill.(D) She votes against the free trade bill and the gun control bill.(E) She votes for the environment bill and the free trade bill.7. Suppose the condition is added that if the legislator votes for the free trade bill, then she will vote against the judicial activism bill. If all other conditions remain in effect, then each of the following must be true EXCEPT:(A) If she votes for the free trade bill, then she votes against the gun control bill.(B) If she votes against the environment bill, then she also votes against the free trade bill.(C) If she votes against the immigration bill, then she votes for the free trade bill.(D) If she votes against the judicial activism bill, then she also votes against the gun control bill.(E) If she votes against the immigration bill, then she also votes against at least three other bills.除了刷真题以外，我觉得大家忽略了一点：这是一个临场发挥的考试，因此考试的状态是最关键的。

LSAT逻辑题考查内容及题型(一)LSAT逻辑题考查内容及题型(一)LSAT逻辑题考查内容及题型(一)逻辑推理题主要考查以下推理能力：1）进行论证的能力2）评价论述的能力3）形成或评价行动方案的能力按照美国ets命题人员的说法，逻辑推理题主要考查考生在以下三个方面能否进行有效推理的能力。

一、论点构建（argumentconstruction）这一方面产问题主要让你去识别或找到：（一）论述的基本结构（thebasicstructureofanargument）（二）正确得到的结论（properlydrawnconclusion）（三）基于的假设（underlyingassumption）（四）被强有力支持的解释性假说（well-supportedexplanatoryhypotheses）（五）结构上相似的论点的平行结构（parallelsbetweenstructurallysimilararguments）二、论点评价（argumentevaluation）这一方面的问题主要让你在分析既定的论点基础之上去识别：（一）加强或削弱既定论点的因素（factorsthatwouldstrengthen,orweaken,thegivenargume nt）（二）在进行论述时所犯的推理错误（reasoningerrorscommittedinmakingthatargument）（三）进行论述所使用的方法（themethodbywhichtheargumentproceeds）三、形成并且评价行动方案（formulatingandevaluatingaplanofaction）这方面的问题主要让你去识别：（一）不同行动方案的相对合适性、有效性或效率（therelativeappropriateness,effectiveness,orefficiencyofdifferentplansofaction）（二）加强或削弱拟议行动方案成功可能的因素（factorsthatwouldstrengthen,orweaken,theprospectsofsuccessforaproposedplanofaction）（三）拟议行动计划所基于的假设（assumptionsunderlyingaproposedplanofaction）根据逻辑推理题的考查内容，我们认为熟悉逻辑推理的主要题型对你大有裨益，下面是我们在考试中将遇到的十一类逻辑推理题。

LSAT分析推理篇分析推理部分一般分四组，共有24个问题。

每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况。

例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等等。

这部分试题主要测试考生理解有关关系结构并推出结论的能力，于GRE考试逻辑部分极为相象。

【题型概况】1.有关分布的题型Six campers:Alice,Betty,Carmen,Dora,Gina,and Harriet are arranging a dishwashing schedule for the six days of their camping trip so that each of them will wash dishes on only one day.Betty washes either on day 2 or day 6.If Alice washes on day I,Carmen washes on day 4;Carmen does not wash on day 4 unless Alice washes on day I.If Alice washes on day I, Harriet washes on day 5; Harriet does not wash on day 5 unless Alice washes on day 1.If Gina does not wash on day 3, Alice washes on day 3.If Alice washes on day 4, Dora washes on day 5.If Betty washes on day 2, Gina washes on day 5.If Harriet washes on day 6, Dora washes on day 4.Question:*Which one of the following is an acceptable order in which the campers can wash dishes from the first to the last day?(A) Dora, Betty, Alice, Gina, Carmen, Harriet(B) Betty, Alice, Harriet, Carmen, Gina, Dora(C) Harriet, Gina, Betty, Carmen, Dora, Alice(D) Carmen, Betty, Alice, Dora, Gina, Harriet(E) Alice, Betty, Dora, Carmen, Gina, Harriet*If Dora washes on day 6, on which day does Carmen wash?(A) I (B) 2 (C)3 (D) 4 (E) 52.有关排列次序的问题Each of seven travelers—Norris,Oribe,Paulsen,Rosen,Semonelli, Tan, and Underwood—will be assigned to exactly one of nine airplane seats. The seats are numbered from 1 through 9 and arranged in rows as follows:Front row: 1 2 3Middle row: 4 5 6Last row: 7 8 9Only seats in the same row as each other are immediately beside each other. Seat assignments must meet the following conditions: Oribe’s seat is in the last row.Paulsen’s seat is immediately beside Rosen’s seat and also immediately beside an unassigned seat.Rosen’s seat is in the row immediately behind the row in which Norris’seat is located.Neither Semonelli nor Underwood is seated immediately beside Norris.Question:*Which one of the following is a pair of travelers who could be assigned to seats 2 and 8, respectively?(A) Norris, Semonelli(B) Oribe, Underwood(C) Paulsen, Oribe(D) Rosen, Semonelli(E) Underwood, Tan*If Semonelli and Underwood are not assigned to seats in the same row as each other, which one of the following must be false?(A) Norris is assigned to seat 2.(B) Paulsen is assigned to seat 5.(C) Rosen is assigned to seat 4.(D) Tan is assigned to seat 2.(E) Underwood is assigned to seat 1.3.有关编组的问题A jeweler makes a single strand of beads by threading onto a string in a single direction from a clasp a series of solid-colored beads. Each bead is either green, orange, purple, red, or yellow. The resulting strand satisfies the following specifications: If a purple bead is adjacent to a yellow bead, any bead that immediately follows and any bead that immediately precedes that pair must be red.Any pair of beads adjacent to each other that are the same color as each other must be green.No orange bead can be adjacent to any red bead.Any portion of the strand containing eight consecutive beads must include at least one bead of each color.Question:*If the strand has exactly eight beads, which one of the following is an acceptable order,starting from the clasp,for the eight beads?(A) green, red, purple, yellow, red, orange, green,purple(B) orange, yellow, red, red, yellow, purple, red,green(C) purple, yellow, red, green, green, orange,yellow, orange(D) red, orange, red, yellow, purple, green, yellow,green(E) red, yellow, purple, red, green, red, green, green*If an orange bead is the fourth bead from the clasp, which one of the following is a pair that could be the second and third beads, respectively?(A) green, orange(B) green, red(C) purple, purple(D) yellow, green(E) yellow, purple4.有关空间分布的问题At an evening concert, a total of six songs—O, P,T, X, Y, and Z—will be performed by three vocalists—George, Helen, and Leslie. The songs will be sung consecutively as solos, and each will be performed exactly once.The following constraints govern the composition of the concert program:Y must be performed earlier than T and earlier than O.P must be performed earlier than Z and later than O.George can perform only X, Y, and Z.Helen can perform only T, P, and X.Leslie can perform only O, P, and X.The vocalist who performs first must be different from the vocalist who performs last.Question:*Which one of the following is an acceptable schedule for the performance of the songs,in order from the first to last song performed?(A) X, T, Y, O, P, Z(B) X, Z, Y, T, O, P(C) Y, O, P, X, T, Z(D) Y, P, O, Z, T, X(E) Y, X, O, P, Z, T*Which one of the following must be true about the program?(A) George performs X.(B) Helen performs O.(C) Helen performs T.(D) Leslie performs P.(E) Leslie performs X.【解题技巧】1.在解答每一组问题时，将其作为一个单元。

最全LSAT考试详解（2）最全LSAT考试详解逻辑推理LSAT的逻辑推理试题共有两个部分，常被称为“辩论题”，考察应试人分析辩题的能力。

每部分有24-26道试题。

一般每道题都有一篇小的短文或对话，然后针对此短文或对话提出问题、选择针对辩论的另一种结论、发现辩题中的谬误、找到相同逻辑的另一种辩题、或找到一个可以强化/弱化辩题的证例。

绝大多数短文都有一道问题，有的则由两道。

短文或对话涉及的范围很广，包括哲学、文学、政治、科技、艺术、历史、体育等等。

逻辑推理试题主要测试考生的以下能力：1.确定中心思想2.找出推理中的假设3.从已知事实或前提得出合理结论4.确定推理的准则并将之应用于新的论证5.确定推理的方法或结构6.找出推理的错误及误解7.确定新的事实或论证对现有论证或结论的加强或削弱8.对论证进行分析分析推理目前的LSAT有一个分析推理部分，一般分四组，共有22–24个问题。

每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况，例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等等，类型包括分组、对比、顺序。

这部分试题主要测试考生理解有关关系结构并推出结论的能力。

考题以划定前提开始(“可能有5人出席下午的会议”)，然后建立彼此之间的关系(“如果Amy出席，那么Bob不出席;如果Cathy出席，那么Dan也出席...”)考生要求从中得到结论(“出席的最大人数是多少?”)。

挑战性在于规则不会只有“独一”的“正确”答案;相反，考生被要求从规则中找到一系列的可能性。

有时，一些问题可能会改变、增加规则，要求考生迅速整理已知信息。

不计分部分目前的考试包含一个实验部分，即法律服务所说的“可变部分”。

它为以后的考试测试新题型。

考生在这部分上的表现不会计入总成绩。

考生不会被告知哪部分是实验题，否则会影响数据收集。

在此之前，这部分考试总是列在前三部分之中，但是在2011年10月以来，LSAT 的实验部分可能会出现在前三部分之外。

LSAT考试科目：LSAT分析推理是什么LSAT分析推理是什么呢？分析推理是LSAT考试的一门课程，一般分四组，共有24个问题。

每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况，例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等。

LSAT分析推理是什么，更多知识等你来看！LSAT考试由五个35分钟的section组成，这些section包括1个阅读理解、1个分析推理和2个逻辑推理，以及一个不计入成绩的加试section。

加试有可能是上述任一种题型。

LSAT分析推理每个section围绕一个单独的段落。

以下是LSAC官方关于分析推理的介绍：Analytical Reasoning questions are designed to assess the ability to consider a group of facts and rules, and, given those facts and rules, determine what could or must be true. The specific scenarios associated with these questions are usually unrelated to law, since they are intended to be accessible to a wide range of test takers. However, the skills tested parallel those involved in determining what could or must be the case given a set of regulations, the terms of a contract, or the facts of a legal case in relation to the law. In Analytical Reasoning questions, you are asked to reason deductively from a set of statements and rules or principles that describe relationships among persons, things, or events.Analytical Reasoning questions appear in sets, with each set based on a single passage. The passage used for each set of questions describes common ordering relationships or grouping relationships, or a combination of both types of relationships. Examples include scheduling employees for work shifts, assigning instructors to class sections, ordering tasks according to priority, and distributing grants for projects.Analytical Reasoning questions test a range of deductive reasoning skills. These include:Comprehending the basic structure of a set of relationships by determining a complete solution to the problem posed (for example, an acceptable seating arrangement of all six diplomats around a table)Reasoning with conditional (“if-then”) statements and recognizing logically equiva lent formulations of such statementsInferring what could be true or must be true from given facts and rulesInferring what could be true or must be true from given facts and rules together with new information in the form of an additional or substitute fact or ruleRecognizing when two statements are logically equivalent in context by identifying a condition or rule that could replace one of the original conditions while still resulting in the same possible outcomesAnalytical Reasoning questions reflect the kinds of detailed analyses of relationships and sets of constraints that a law student must perform in legal problem solving. For example, an Analytical Reasoning passage might describe six diplomats being seated around a table, following certain rules of protocol as to who can sit where. You, the test taker, must answer questions about the logical implications of given and new information. For example, you may be asked who can sit between diplomats X and Y, or who cannot sit next to X if W sits next to Y. Similarly, if you were a student in law school, you might be asked to analyze a scenario involving a set of particular circumstances and a set of governing rules in the form of constitutional provisions, statutes, administrative codes, or prior rulings that have been upheld. You might then be asked to determine the legal options in the scenario: what is required given the scenario, what is permissible given the scenario, and what is prohibited given the scenario. Or you might be asked to develop a “theory” for the case: when faced with an incomplete set of facts about the case, you must fill in the picture based on what is implied by the facts that are known. The problem could be elaborated by the addition of new information or hypotheticals.No formal training in logic is required to answer these questions correctly. Analytical Reasoning questions are intended to be answered using knowledge, skills, and reasoning ability generally expected of college students and graduates.。

最新LSAT考试逻辑推理模拟试题(一)TEST 1SECTION ITime 35 minutes 25 QuestionsDirections: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by commonsense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. After you have chosen the best answer, blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.1. Mr. West: Well, Ms. Smith, by how much do you plan to increase your donation to the cultural society this year? You know how many worthwhile projects we do.Ms. Smith: I’m not so sure of that. I was very upset about the statue you purchased last month. I think I’ll give no more money to your cause.Mr. West: That’s all right: we’ll just put you down for the same amount that you gave last year. Which one of the following words or phrases has been misinterpreted in the conversation?(A) “increase”(B) “you know”(C) “worthwhile”(D) “no more”（D）(E) “same amount”2. Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type.(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts.(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it.(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.（E）(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.Questions 3-4The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.3. Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?(A) Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.(B) Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.(C) The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.(D) A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.（C）(E) Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.4. Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively undermine the author’s argument?(A) Although the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is very small, the total number of lightning fatalities is many times greater.(B) Electric blenders are among the safest household appliances; were the author to compare fatalities from electrical appliances in general, she would get a much higher figure.(C) Most people would rather take their chances with blenders and golf games than with grizzly bears.(D) Bears in general—including black, brown, and cinnamon bears, as well as grizzly bears—kill many more people than do electric blenders.（E）(E) Statistics show that the number of times people use electric blenders each year exceeds the number of times people play golf each year, which in turn far exceeds the number of contacts people have with grizzly bears each year.5. Emperor: The enemy empire across the sea has harassed us for centuries. I want to conquer it and stop it once and for all. What advice can you give me?Admiral: If you cross the sea, a mighty empire will fall.Emperor: In that case, prepare the troops. We set sail tonight.Of the following, the strongest criticism of the Emperor’s decision to invade would be that it(A) is certain to lead to the emperor’s defeat(B) is based on opinion rather than objective facts about troop strength(C) contradicts the Admiral’s statement(D) fails to cons ider fully the possible meanings of the Admiral’s advice（D）(E) is a futile strategy for solving the problem at hand6. No senator spoke at the convention unless he or she was a Democrat. No Democrat both spoke at the convention and was a senator.Which one of the following conclusions can be correctly drawn from the statements above?(A) No one but senators spoke at the convention.(B) No Democrat spoke at the convention.(C) Only Democrats spoke at the convention.(D) No senator spoke at the convention.（D）(E) Some Democrat senators spoke at the convention.7. If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous. She is not a concert pianist since she is not famous.The conclusion above is unsound because the author does not consider that(A) Sarah could be a famous actress.(B) Sarah could be a harpist for a major orchestra.(C) Sarah could be a pianist with a rock group.(D) Sarah could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra.（D）(E) Sarah could be famous for another reason.8. Neuroscientists are making progress in discovering more about the cause of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s disease patients suffer from dementia and sever memory loss. Autopsies performed on such patients have revealed the presence of brain lesions caused by abnormal protein deposits. Similar deposits are also found in the brains of elderly patients who do not suffer from Alzheimer’s disease. It follows that everyone who lives long enough will eventually develop Alzheimer’s disease.Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion that everyone who lives long enough will eventually develop Alzheimer’s disease?(A) The lesions found in the brains of non-Alzheimer’s disease patients are far less extensiv e than those found in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients.(B) The developing brain produces a greater number of cells than it will ever use. The extra cells are later destroyed by what biologists call “programmed cell death.”(C) The procedure that allows scientists to discover the presence of protein deposits during an autopsy is not yet refined enough to ensure detection of the lesions in all patients.(D) Autopsies have shown that some people lack the chemical necessary for protein deposits to cause brain lesions.（D）(E) Though most Alzheimer’s disease patients develop the disease when they are in their late fifties to early seventies, the frequency of patients who develop the disease in their forties is on the rise.9. Free public education is the best form of education there is. Therefore, we must fight to ensure its continued existence; that is, we must be ready to defend the principle of equality of educational opportunity. Because this principle is we worth defending, it is clear that free public education is better than any other form of education.Which one of the following illustrates the same weak reasoning as found in the passage?(A) I love music, and that’s why I listen to it constantly. I have my stereo or radio on every waking minute. Since I play music all the time, I must really love it.(B) Books are my most valuable possessions. My books are like my friends—each pleases me in different ways. Just as I would give up everything to save my friends, so too with my books. (C) I would much rather be poor and respected than be rich and despised. To have the respect of others is far more valuable than to have millions of dollars.(D) I have never been betrayed by any of my friends. They have been true to me through good times and bad. Therefore I will never betray any of my friends.（A）(E) Because every plant I have ever seen has green leaves, I have concluded that all plants must have green leaves. This looks like a plant but it does not have green leaves, so it cannot be a plant.10. Some people say that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’s resources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysis fails to recognize,however, that much of the world’s agricultural resources are use d to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States, for example, almost one-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. A steer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensive meat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resources and population growth.Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn?(A) People prefer eating meat to eating grain.(B) Meat is twenty-one times more expensive than grain.(C) The limits of the earth’s agricultural resources are not finite.(D) More than one-half of the agricultural acreage in the United States is devoted to crops fed to humans.（E）(E) Growing crops for human consumption on the acreage currently devoted to crops for livestock will yield more food for more people.SECTION IVTime 35 minutes 26 QuestionsDirections: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages...1. The government should enact a bill that would prohibit the sale and consumption of alcohol on commuter trains. Recently, the state, exercising its legitimate authority, passed a law to protect the health of commuters by prohibiting smoking on the commuter line. When intoxicated riders get off the train, get in their cars, and drive, the public is exposed to at least as much danger as are nonsmoking rail passengers who are forced to inhale cigarette smoke.In arguing that alcohol consumption on commuter trains should be banned, the author relies on(A) the fact that drinking alcohol is dangerous to one’s health(B) the principle that people need to be protected from their own actions(C) the use of emotionally charged descriptions of smoking and drinking alcohol(D) the reader’s sympathy for the problems of commuters（E）(E) a comparison between the effects of smoking and the effects of drinking alcohol2. Creating false marble is an art at which only those with a light hand can excel. Picasso, however, was a great artist, so while he did not have a light hand he could have excelled at creating false marble.Which one of the following contains a logical error that most closely resembles the logical error contained in the passage?(A) The police have determined that the murderer left his fingerprints on the knife. Ira’s fingerprints do not match those on the knife, so we can eliminate him as a suspect.(B) It is true that it is necessary to work hard in order to succeed. However, smith was governor of the state, so it was possible for him to succeed without working hard.(C) Whenever I eat nuts of any kind I break out in hives. After eating the pie I did not break out, so I know it could not have been real pecan pie.(D) If the inventory can be sold within the next few months the business can be saved. However,since a sale cannot be concluded quickly, the business will go under.（B）(E) Only the brave deserve the spoils. Major Wilson has distinguished himself several times for bravery, so surely he deserves the spoils.3. Cass: War and peace are mutually exclusive. Therefore, a nation cannot be preparing for both war and peace simultaneously.Stanislaus: But aren’t the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. doing precisely that? They are spending vast amounts of money on war research and armaments while at the same time they are negotiating trade agreements and nuclear arms treaties that are designed to secure peace. Although they are maintaining a shaky peaceful coexistence, they are preparing for both war and peace simultaneously.In order to refute Cass’s conclusion, Stanislaus(A) demonstrates that a nation can be at war and at peace at the same time(B) points out that there are several different meanings to the words “war” and “peace”(C) uses a different meaning for the te rm “simultaneously” than Cass does(D) shows that preparing for war and preparing for peace are not mutually exclusive（D）(E) changes an argument based on a definition into one based on an ethical consideration4. According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.（C）(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.Questions 5-6Patient: Doctor, I read an article that claimed that the first few hours after birth are very important to establishing a mother-infant bond, which is the first step in building a healthy relationship. Can you assure me that my relationship with my baby has not been permanently harmed by our separation for several days after his birth?Physician: Your relationship with your child has not been harmed by the separation. Mother-infant bonding is not like an “instant glue” that cements your relationship forever. Having your infant with you during the period immediately after birth does give your relationship a head start, but many factors are involved in building a strong and lasting relationship between a mother and her child.5. If everything the doctor says is correct, which one of the following must be true?(A) The best relationships between mothers and their children are caused by immediate mother-infant bonding.(B) There is a high degree of correlation between the best relationships between mothers and their children and those that began with immediate mother-infant bonding.(C) A strong and lasting relationship is necessary for mother-infant bonding.(D) Where immediate mother-infant bonding takes place, a strong and lasting relationship between a mother and her child will be assured.（E）(E) Immediate mother-infant bonding is not necessary for a strong and lasting relationship between a mother and her child.6. The doctor does which one of the following in her reply to her patient?(A) She rejects an analogy in an attempt to reduce the patient’s concern.(B) She cites evidence to show that the patient’s worry is unfounded.(C) She misinterprets the patient’s explanation of her concern.(D) She establishes that the article that the patient read was in error.（A）(E) She names other factors that are more important in creating a mother-infant bond.7. A recent survey showed that many workers in a certain company are dissatisfied with their jobs. The survey also showed that most of the dissatisfied workers believe that they have little control over their job assignments. Therefore, to increase workers job satisfaction the company’s management need only concentrate on changing workers’ beliefs regarding the degree of control they have over their job assignments.Which one of the following, if also shown by the survey, would most seriously call into question the conclusion made by the author of the passage?(A) The dissatisfied workers feel that their wages are too low and working conditions are unsatisfactory.(B) The number of workers in the company who are satisfied with their jobs is greater than the number who are dissatisfied.(C) The workers in the company are more dissatisfied than workers in other companies.(D) Most people in company management believe that the workers already have too much control over their work.（A）(E) The workers in the company who are satisfied with their jobs believe that they have a lot of control over their job assignments.8. Dr. Sheila Porter plans to run an experiment using nursing students. Each student will be shown either a pleasant nature film or a disturbing horror film. Each student will be observed by someone who—looking only at the student’s facial expressions—must ascertain which film is being shown. Students shown the horror movie are told to hide their feelings in order to convince the observer that they are watching a pleasant film. Dr. Porter hypothesizes that all the students in the experiment who are convincing will be among the best at working with patients. The hypothesis will be tested by comparing the convincing students and unconvincing students in terms of their performance with patents.Which one of the following incidents best illustrates Dr. Porter’s hypothesis?(A) Niles, the most convincing student in the experiment, later went on to become a physician.(B) After graduating, Yoshiro, a nursing student who was convincing in the experiment, helped care for Bram, a patient at a hospital. Bram recovered from his operation.(C) After graduating, Kim, a nursing student in the experiment who watched the nature film, was removed from the staff of a hospital for unacceptable performance in patient care.(D) Daria, a nursing student who was convincing in the experiment, later received “A’s” in those classes in which working with patients in a teaching hospital was the sole basis of her grades.（D）(E) Marite, a nursing student who was not convincing in the experiment, later quit nursing school.9. Those who think with a hierarchical mentality strive for situations in which their side is dominant and the other side is submissive. In contrast, communal thinkers strive for parity among all sides. Therefore, achieving parity of nuclear weaponry between the East and the West is not enough for Western military generals.Which one of the following assumptions would provide the most support for the conclusion above?(A) Western military generals do not have the same mentality as do Eastern military generals.(B) Parity in nuclear weaponry requires that military generals from both the East and the West think in communal terms.(C) Western military generals want parity with respect to strength in nuclear weaponry between the East and the West.(D) Western military generals’ thinking about relative strength in nuclear weaponry is hierarchical.（D）(E) The thinking of military generals with respect to relative strength in nuclear weaponry is either hierarchical or communal.10. It has always been difficult to understand the basis of politics in the People’s Republic of China. Because the system is effectively closed, it is impossible to know with any degree of confidence who is allied with whom and for what reasons. Yet Chinese politics does exhibit many of the external character istics of factional political systems, as found in more open societies. It is legitimate to conclude, therefore, that China has a factional political system.Which one of the following, if true, would confirm the author’s conclusion that China has a factional political system?(A) All open political systems are factional political systems.(B) All factional political systems are closed political systems.(C) All closed political systems are factional political systems.(D) China’s political system is more open than many existing factional political systems.（C）(E) China’s political system is more closed than all existing factional political systems.TEST 2SECTION IITime 35 minutes 24 QuestionsDirections: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages.1. Some people believe that witnessing violence in movies will discharge aggressive energy. Does watching someone else eat fill one’s own stomach?In which one of the following does the reasoning most closely parallel that employed in the passage?(A) Some people think appropriating supplies at work for their own personal use is morally wrong. Isn’t shoplifting morally wrong?(B) Some people think nationalism is defensible. Hasn’t nationalism been the excuse for committing abominable crimes?(C) Some people think that boxing is fixed just because wrestling usually is. Are the two sports managed by the same sort of people?(D) Some people think that economists can control inflation. Can meteorologists make the sun shine?（D）(E) Some people think workaholics are compensating for a lack of interpersonal skills. However, aren’t most doctors workaholics?2. Ann: All the campers at Camp Winnehatchee go to Tri-Cities High SchoolBill: That’s not true. Some Tri-Cities students are campers at Camp Lakemont.Bill’s answer can be best explained on the assumption that he has interpreted Ann’s remark to mean that(A) most of the campers at Camp Lakemont come from high schools other than Tri-Cities(B) most Tri-Cities High School students are campers at Camp Winnehatchee(C) some Tri-Cities High School students have withdrawn from Camp Lakemont(D) all Tri-Cities High School students have withdrawn from Camp Lakemont（E）(E) only campers at Camp Winnehatchee are students at Tri-Cities High School3. More than a year ago, the city announced that police would crack down on illegally parked cars and that resources would be diverted from writing speeding tickets to ticketing illegally parked cars. But no crackdown has taken place. The police chief claims that resources have had to be diverted from writing speeding tickets to combating the city’s staggering drug problem. Yet the police are still writing as many speeding tickets as ever. Therefore, the excuse about resources being tied up in fighting drug-related crime simply is not true.The conclusion in the passage depends on the assumption that(A) every member of the police force is qualified to work on combating the city’s drug problem(B) drug-related crime is not as serious a problem for the city as the police chief claims it is(C) writing speeding tickets should be as important a priority for the city as combating drug-related crime(D) the police could be cracking down on illegally parked cars and combating the drug problem without having to reduce writing speeding tickets（E）(E) the police cannot continue writing as many speeding tickets as ever while diverting resources to combating drug-related crime4. Dried grass clippings mixed into garden soil gradually decompose, providing nutrients for beneficial soil bacteria. This results in better-than-average plant growth. Yet mixing fresh grass clippings into garden soil usually causes poorer-than-average plant growth.Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the difference in plant growth described above?(A) The number of beneficial soil bacteria increases whenever any kind of plant material is mixed into garden soil.(B) Nutrients released by dried grass clippings are immediately available to beneficial soil bacteria.(C) Some dried grass clippings retain nutrients originally derived from commercial lawn fertilizers, and thus provide additional enrichment to the soil.(D) Fresh grass clippings mixed into soil decompose rapidly, generating high levels of heat that kill beneficial soil bacteria.（D）(E) When a mix of fresh and dried grass clippings is mixed into garden soil, plant growth often decreases.5. A gas tax of one cent per gallon would raise one billion dollars per year at current consumption rates. Since a tax of fifty cents per gallon would therefore raise fifty billion dollars per year, it seems a perfect way to deal with the federal budget deficit. This tax would have the additional advantage that the resulting drop in the demand for gasoline would be ecologically sound and would keep our country from being too dependent on foreign oil producers.Which one of the following most clearly identifies an error in the author’s reasoning?(A) The author cites irrelevant data.(B) The author relies on incorrect current consumption figures.(C) The author makes incompatible assumptions.(D) The author mistakes an effect for a cause.（C）(E) The author appeals to conscience rather than reason.6. As symbols of the freedom of the wilderness, bald eagles have the unique capacity to inspire people and foster in them a sympathetic attitude toward the needs of other threatened species. Clearly, without that sympathy and the political will it engenders, the needs of more obscure species will go unmet. The conservation needs of many obscure species can only be met by beginning with the conservation of this symbolic species, the bald eagle.Which one of the following is the main point of the passage as a whole?(A) Because bald eagles symbolize freedom, conservation efforts should be concentrated on them rather than on other, more obscure species.(B) The conservation of bald eagles is the first necessary step in conserving other endangered species.(C) Without increased public sympathy for conservation, the needs of many symbolic species will go unmet.(D) People’s love of the wilderness can be used to engender political support for conservation efforts.（B）(E) Other threatened species do not inspire people or foster sympathy as much as do bald eagles.7. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific finding, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientist, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct the experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.（A）(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.8. Alice: Quotas on automobile imports to the United States should be eliminated. Then domestic producers would have to compete directly with Japanese manufacturers and would be forced to produce higher-quality cars. Such competition would be good for consumers.David: You fail to realize, Alice, that quotas on automobile imports are pervasive worldwide. Since German, Britain, and France have quotas, so should the United States.Which one of the following most accurately character izes David’s response to Alice’s statement?(A) David falsely accuses Alice of contradicting herself.(B) David unfairly directs his argument against Alice personally.(C) David uncovers a hidden assumption underlying Alice’s position.(D) David takes a position that is similar to the one Alice has taken.（E）(E) David fails to address the reasons Alice cites in favor of her conclusion.9. Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of child-care services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?(A) The quality of child care will improve.(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care.(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.（B）(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.10. Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that。

lsattr 题目【原创实用版】目录1.LSAT 简介2.LSAT 的结构和内容3.LSAT 的备考策略4.LSAT 对法学院申请的重要性正文1.LSAT 简介LSAT（Law School Admission Test）即法学院入学考试，是美国和加拿大法学院的入学考试，用于评估潜在法学院学生的逻辑和分析能力。

该考试由美国法学院考试委员会（Law School Admission Council，简称LSAC）主办，是申请进入这两个国家法学院的重要标准之一。

2.LSAT 的结构和内容LSAT 分为三个部分：阅读理解、逻辑推理和分析性写作。

此外，考试还包含一个不计入成绩的实验部分。

（1）阅读理解：这部分包括三篇文章，每篇文章后附有五道问题。

主要测试考生的阅读理解、分析和推理能力。

（2）逻辑推理：这部分包括约 20 道题目，要求考生根据给定的信息进行推理和判断，测试考生的逻辑分析能力。

（3）分析性写作：这部分要求考生在 30 分钟内完成一篇短文，对给定的论点进行分析和评价，测试考生的写作和批判性思维能力。

3.LSAT 的备考策略（1）熟悉考试结构和题型：考生需要了解 LSAT 的各个部分和题型，以便更好地应对考试。

（2）提高阅读速度和理解能力：阅读是 LSAT 的重要部分，考生需要通过大量阅读来提高自己的阅读速度和理解能力。

（3）加强逻辑推理训练：逻辑推理部分是 LSAT 的关键，考生需要通过练习逻辑题来提高自己的逻辑分析能力。

（4）锻炼写作能力：分析性写作部分需要考生具备较强的写作和批判性思维能力，考生需要多进行写作练习，提高自己的写作水平。

4.LSAT 对法学院申请的重要性LSAT 成绩是申请法学院的重要依据之一，它直接影响到考生能否被录取以及获得的奖学金数额。

因此，对于有意申请法学院的考生来说，取得优异的 LSAT 成绩至关重要。

lsat infer题目LSAT（Logical Reasoning）推理题目是法学院入学考试（Law School Admission Test）中的一部分，主要考察考生的逻辑推理和批判性思维能力。

以下是几个LSAT推理题目的示例：1. A city has two hospitals: the General Hospital and the Children's Hospital. The General Hospital treats adults, while the Children's Hospital treats only children. Each hospital has a waiting room. One day, a family with three children enters the General Hospital's waiting room. Explain how this is possible.2. A police officer pulled over a speeding car and wrote a ticket for the driver. When the officer returned to his patrol car, he found that someone had set fire to it. Explain how this is possible.3. A restaurant owner claims that the best way to prepare a turkey is to roast it in the oven at 350 degrees Fahrenheit for two hours per pound. A customer challenges this claim, saying that a turkey should be cooked at 450 degrees Fahrenheit for one hour per pound. Who is correct? Explain why.4. A group of explorers enters a cave and finds a set of hieroglyphics on the wall. They cannot read them, so they take pictures and leave. Later, an Egyptologist examines the pictures and determines that the hieroglyphics say "Death to all who enter here." How did the Egyptologist know this? Explain why hieroglyphics were used by ancient Egyptians.这些题目都是基于现实生活中的场景或情境，要求考生通过逻辑推理和分析，找出合理的解释或推断出正确的结论。

可乐留学网 留学可以很快乐第1页 / 可乐留学网 最实用的LSAT 逻辑推理解题技巧大家都知道想进入美国的法学院就读并不是一件容易的事情，必须参加法学院入学考试LSAT ，而这项考试并不是那么容易，每一门都需要投入时间和精力。

考试过程中所运用的各种策略，考试技巧不能从根本上提高你的学习，但如果考试技巧不够好，你考试时必然要吃亏。

那么LSAT 逻辑推理解题技巧是什么呢？1、考试的时候不要想你能得多少分，不要想后面试题的内容，集中全部的精力在你面前的每一道试题上。

记住一次只注意一道题。

2、现在花几分钟去回想一下你准备考试的过程，想一想你比以前提高了多少，这会使你建立起自信心。

你的态度和表现对你考试当天的成绩起着决定性的作用。

3、在做逻辑推理和阅读理解部分时，要先把五个备选答案看一遍。

尤其是逻辑题，经过筛选后要选择从客观语法上看起来正确的答案。

4、考试第三部分和第四部分的间歇通常会引起人们的紧张，其实你不必太在意，别人并不比你准备的充分或有更多的考试经验。

忽略这一切，带上随身听，听一听能让你兴奋和放松的音乐。

5、不要在考试的时候去算哪部分不能得分，这对你没有任何帮助，只会让你出错。

考试的时候就要把精力放在每一道题上，这样你才能成功。

6、做题前你应该把试卷全部浏览一遍，然后决定从哪一部分开始做。

7、不要在任何一部分上纠缠，也许每一部分的最后是最容易的，先去做它们。

如果你在做某个部分的开始时遇到了难题，不用惊慌，尤其是在逻辑推理的部分。

如果遇到这种情况，就先做简单的，把难题放在最后做。

8、在休息时最大限度的放松自己，吃一些高能量带糖的食品，比如苹果、香焦、坚果等。

9、你不需要答对所有的题才得到很高的分数，即使错20道题你也 可得到163分，那么就有90%的人得分在你以下。

有五分之一的题没来得及也没关系，反正大家都一样，放松点，遇见难题也不要惊慌失措，蒙就成了。

10、在考试前充分地做实战练习，打破考试时的神秘感。

LSAT题型LSAT（Law School Admission Test）是美国法学院入学考试。

作为申请者进入美国法学院的必备考试之一，LSAT考试主要用于评估申请者的逻辑推理、阅读理解和分析问题的能力。

一、LSAT题型概述LSAT考试涵盖了多个题型，包括逻辑推理、阅读理解和分析问题。

每个题型都测试不同的能力和技巧，考生需要针对不同题型制定相应的解题策略。

以下是LSAT 常见的题型：1. 逻辑推理题逻辑推理题主要考察考生的逻辑思维和分析能力。

题干通常会给出一段逻辑论证的论据和结论，考生需要根据所给信息判断论证的有效性、推理的合理性等。

2. 阅读理解题阅读理解题考察考生的阅读理解和理解能力。

考生需要在规定的时间内阅读文章，并回答与文章内容相关的问题。

文章内容涉及法律、哲学、社会科学等多个领域。

3. 分析问题题分析问题题主要考察考生分析问题和解决问题的能力。

题干通常给出一个问题和相关信息，考生需要根据所给信息作出推理、分析和判断。

二、LSAT题型分析接下来将分别对LSAT的三个常见题型进行详细分析。

1. 逻辑推理题分析逻辑推理题是LSAT考试中最常见的题型，占据了考试的很大比例。

逻辑推理题要求考生根据所给的事实和推理进行逻辑推理，判断陈述的真伪、条件的充分性等。

解答这类题目的关键是理解论据和结论，并进行合理的推理。

逻辑推理题可以分为几个常见的类型，包括：•假设题：要求考生根据所给的假设条件判断结论的合理性。

•推理题：要求考生根据所给的事实和条件推理结论。

•强弱化题：要求考生根据所给的信息判断某一论证的论据或结论的强弱。

•概括题：要求考生根据所给的论证内容判断最适合的概括。

在解答逻辑推理题时，考生需要注意判断过程的逻辑合理性，善于分析论证的结构和推理方式，避免被干扰选项所迷惑。

2. 阅读理解题分析阅读理解题在LSAT考试中是必不可少的一部分，考察考生的阅读理解和分析能力。

阅读理解题通常要求考生在规定时间内阅读一篇文章，并回答与文章内容相关的问题。

LSAT三大解题步骤
LSAT三大解题步骤LSAT三大解题步骤做逻辑题，可以参考以下三大步骤：
问题，明晰问题目的，从而迅速确定解题方向
先读问题而非段落似乎有违常理，但这样可以事先了解题目类型。

只有知道了问题目的类型，阅读段落才能更具有针对性。

另外，问题目的本身变化不多，往往一眼就可以看出题型。

注意：警惕选项中出现的not，unless，except，least等词，许多人由于漏看了这些小词而与正确答案无缘。

读段落，根据不同的问题目的确定不同的解题重点
如问题属于假设、支持、反对、评价类，读段落时重在找出论点的前提与结论。

边读边思考：从前提中能否推出结论？结论成立还需要哪些假设？
如问题属于归纳类，读段落时要注重其逻辑层次结构及去向，边读边琢磨：作者想要说明什么？
如问题属于逻辑应用与技法类，读段落时分清前提与结论。

边读边考虑：段落推理犯了哪种逻辑错误？结论的成立还需要哪些假设？假设的合理性如何等？
如问题属于解释类，读段落时要格外关注要解释的对象以及解释对象的特点。

边读边斟酌：怎么样才能找一个与要解释的内容直接相关的答案？
找答案，注意有些题型可调整看选项的顺序
读完问题与段落之后，寻读五个选项，选出正确答案。

有时，阅读选项时要放慢速度，有时甚至应反复掂量。

当然，若费时过多，猜测并非下策。

而像假设的某类题型（后有详述）以及except题型，可以调整看选项顺序。

LSAT三大解题步骤相关内容:。

分析推理（组题）讲义 2二、分组题部分分组（从给出的元素中选出一部分进行分组）： 4 个原则：（根本原则就是要把条件从数字的角度加以理解） 1. 首先想到需要扔掉几个； 2. 若箭头两端提到的是同一类型的元素，则此条件非常重要； 3. 对于 A->~B 这样的条件，箭头两端的元素至少要扔掉一个； 4. 对于 A->B 这样的条件，当根据其他条件知道最多只能再扔掉一个元素时，条件右端 的元素都不能扔掉。

（重点考察满足原则 2 的条件） 例： （W，X，Y，Z）中选 2 个，（G，H，J，K，L）中选 3 个，需遵守下列条件： G->~Y,~L H->K->X J->W 问题：Y 入选则谁也肯定入选？例： 7 个法官，分为 3 类：C，M 和 L。

其中 C 类 2 个，M 类 2 个，L 类 3 个。

现在他们要投票 表决某 法案，每个人不是支持就是反对。

同时要满足 下列条件： 若两个 C 和至少一个 L 态度一样，则两个 M 也会以那种方式投票。

2C+L -> 2M 若 3 个 L 的态度一样，则 C 与他们的态度不同。

3L -> ~C 每个法案至少有两个人支持，也至少有两个人反对。

反对的法官中有一个是 C。

问题：若当前有两个法官投了反对票，则谁必定投赞成票？ 分析：此题并不是部分分组题，但它应用了解部分分组题的一个重要原则，即原则 3。

现在按步骤分析问题。

问题提到了反对，找条件中与反对有关的，找到“至少有两个人 反对”和“反对的法官中有一个是 C” 两个，继续找与 C 有关的条件，发现条件 1、2 都与 C 相关，但条件 1 涉及 3 类法官，条件 2 只涉及 2 类法官，由自由度最小原则，我们由条件 2 着手。

由于已知一个 C 是反对，我们只考察 3 个 L 和剩下的那一个 C 之间的关系。

由原则 3，我 们 知道，3 个 L 和 1 个 C 的态度肯定不一致， 里面至少有一个人态度与其他人不同（~3L 与~C 至少有一种情况存在）。

2023年LSAT考试真题2023年LSAT考试真题已经公布，这是一次备受关注的考试。

LSAT（美国法学入学考试）是许多想要在美国攻读法学硕士（JD）学位的学生必须参加的考试。

在这个真题里，我们将探讨一些题目类型和例题。

希望以下内容对你有所帮助。

题目一：逻辑推理逻辑推理是LSAT考试中的重要部分。

在这一部分，学生需要根据一些给定的条件进行分析和推理，以确定哪个选项是最符合逻辑的。

以下是一个例题："如果马丁是个音乐家，那么他会擅长吉他。

马丁不擅长吉他。

所以，他不是音乐家。

"根据上述陈述，学生需要选出以下哪个选项是最恰当的：A. 马丁是个音乐家，同时也擅长吉他。

B. 马丁是个音乐家，但并不擅长吉他。

C. 马丁不是音乐家，但擅长吉他。

D. 马丁不是音乐家，同时也不擅长吉他。

通过推理，我们可以得出答案是D。

因为题目中给出的条件是，如果马丁是音乐家，那么他会擅长吉他。

而题目中明确告诉我们，他不擅长吉他，因此可以判断他不是音乐家。

题目二：阅读理解阅读理解是LSAT考试的另一个重要部分。

在这一部分，学生需要阅读一篇文章，然后回答相关问题。

以下是一个例题：阅读下面这段短文，并回答问题。

"根据最新的研究，饮食和健康之间存在紧密的关联。

科学家们发现，均衡的饮食可以提供人体所需的营养物质，并降低患病风险。

然而，目前的问题在于，很多人的饮食习惯不健康，充斥着高糖、高盐和高脂肪的食物。

为了改善这种情况，人们应该学会选择更健康的食物，并培养良好的饮食习惯。

"问题：根据短文，为什么人们应该选择更健康的食物？通过阅读短文，我们可以看出，科学家们发现均衡的饮食可以提供人体所需的营养物质，并降低患病风险。

因此，人们应该选择更健康的食物来改善他们的饮食习惯。

题目三：逻辑游戏逻辑游戏是LSAT考试中的另一个题型。

这种题型要求学生通过解决一些逻辑问题和条件制约，来确定最终的结果。

以下是一个例题：四名游戏选手Dave，Jane，Mark和Sue，根据一些条件，你需要确定每个人的游戏顺序。

LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题LSAT考试是美国法学院申请入学的参考条件之一,该成绩作为预估申请入学者在法学院是与否有正确且合理的推论与判断能力、分析及评估能力而进行的考试。

本文整理了LSAT考试分析推理题。

快来看看吧~LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题-1-1-14. Either Perry’s faction or Tucker’s faction, but not both, will win control of the government. If Perry’s faction wins, the nation will suffer economically. If Tucker’s faction wins, the nation will suffer militarily.Given the statements in the passage, which one of the following statements must be true?(A) It is possible, but not certain, that the nation will neither suffer economically nor suffer militarily.(B) If the nation suffers economically, it is certain that Perry’s faction has won control of the government.(C) It is certain that the nation will suffer either economically or militarily, and also certain that it will not suffer both.(D) If the nation suffers militarily, it is possible, but not certain, that Tucker’s faction has won control of the government.(E) If the nation suffers both economically and militarily, it is certain that neither Perry’s faction nor Tucker’s has won control of the government.由原文，可得1。

LSAT分析推理真题精选及详解Directions:Each group of questions in this section is based on a set of conditions. In answering some of the questions, it may be useful to draw a rough diagram. Choose the response that most accurately and completely answers each question and blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.A company employee generates a series of five-digit product codes in accordance with the following rules:the codes use the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, and no others.Each digit occurs exactly once in any code.the second digit has a value exactly twice that of the first digit.the value of the third digit is less than the value of the fifth digit.1. If the last digit of an acceptable product code is 1, it must be true that the(A) first digit is 2(B) second digit is 0(C) third digit is 3(D) fourth digit is 4(E) fourth digit is 0答案：A解析：如果1在最后一位，第三位比1还小只能是0，而由于前两位必须是倍数关系，那么前两位必然是2和4。

LSAT逻辑单题的方法讲解大家知道LSAT逻辑单题的方法吗?逻辑推理试题共有两个部分，每部分有24-26道试题。

一般每道题都有一篇小的短文或对话，然后针对此短文或对话提出问题。

短文或对话涉及的范围很广，包括哲学、文学、政治、科技、艺术、历史、体育等等。

逻辑推理试题主要测试：确定中心思想找出推理中的假设从已知事实或前提得出合理结论确定推理的准则并将之应用于新的论证确定推理的方法或结构找出推理的错误及误解确定新的事实或论证对现有论证或结论的加强或削弱对论证进行分析对待LSAT逻辑单题：关键是找出主要的因果关系，矛盾问题所在，或者是说找出差异所在，所有的逻辑单题如果错都是原于概念或是范围的差异，然后再驳斥他，主要有几点，1反对原因，2 直接反对结论，3反对论证过程，也就是两种，a 找个他因，b无因有果。

如果是支持的话，就是相对的情况，a 排除他因。

b，无因无果。

这就是主要的几种论证方法，还有的就是归谬法，也就是先假设其结论成立，根据这个结论推出来一个与原因相矛盾的情况，那就反对了这个原因。

还有的就是因果倒置的问题，也就是把原因当作结果，把结果当作原因，比如：盗版的问题，促使软件的价格比较高，但是也可以反对他说，是软件的价格高导致盗版的出现。

关于其他的几种题型，1 画线句子题，这是一种比较新的题型，一般来说是要判断其在逻辑论证中所起的作用，无非几种情况，a 论点b 论据〈as an evidence to support of weaken the conclusion c 论证过程2 图表题，这种题关键是要看出区别所在，差异所在，也就是要注意几点，a最高点b最低点c转折点。

还有如果是两条线，要看出斜率大小，还有起点的差异，几条线之间的距离的变化，如果是其他图形，也就是一条：找出差异，然后如果要支持就减小差异，如果是解释，就指出差异，如果是反对就拉大其差异。

3提出解决办法题，这也是一种比较不大常见的题，也就是找出逻辑论证中的差异，或者是导致某中现象的原因，然后提出一种办法能够消除这种差异或是这个原因就对了，比如：龙虾减少了，原因是扑虾船连小龙虾都扑，导致龙虾的繁衍减少。

如何准备LSAT分析推理题如何准备LSAT分析推理题LSAT考试中的分析推理题部分一直被同学认为是小菜一碟，但考试中考生往往卡壳的也是分析推理题。

的确这一部分对考生尤其是中国学生来说对阅读能力的要求不是太高，考生平时在练习时做得最爽的就是分析推理题。

而逻辑分析题相对要求更高的阅读能力，因此考生在复习开始阶段也是分析推理题错得少，而逻辑推理题错得多。

但ETS看到逻辑推理题变难并没有难倒中国考生，于是又从另一个角度即分析推理题来为难中国考生。

当然再难也难不倒咱中国人，我这里只是想提醒将要参加考试或正在复习的同学们不要轻视了分析推理题。

分析推理题大多针对若干元素被分组或被安排前后顺序等一些基本问题。

它和逻辑推理题不同，它没有较为详细的背景段落信息而只有一些貌似凌乱的涉及到时间、位置等属性的分组条件，排列条件，挑选条件。

解题的关键就是在尽可能短的时间里从这些条件中理出头绪。

因此分析推理题讲究的是解题方法和解题速度。

而速度一是靠方法来提高，另一个则是靠练习。

要将原文条件熟记在心应用自如而不需要在解题过程中总是回过头来看原文条件，这就需要一定时间的练习来达到。

元素之间的关系是由条件来描述的。

逻辑题中的条件分两种，一种是原文条件，一种是题干条件或选项条件。

做分析推理题首先要读的是原文条件，即题目之前所给出的所有条件。

这部分条件包括背景段落和条件。

因此解分析推理题第一步是读懂背景段落，从背景段落中你必须清楚这道题涉及几个元素，这些元素分成几类，这些元素有什么属性比如时间，位置等。

因此第一步要高度注意的条件就是数字限制。

下一步则是读懂条件。

这部分条件主要是给定一部分或所有元素被处理的构架。

这部分条件分成限制性条件和确定性条件。

限制性条件就是没有涉及具体元素而是给定处理所有元素的要求。

确定性条件则是针对具体元素的条件。

根据对解题的作用又将分析推理题条件分成显性条件和隐含条件，固定条件和不固定条件，充分条件和必要条件。