IQ

IQ:
定义：不能狭隘IQ is the ability to know and understand the objective things and to use knowledge, experience, to solve the problem by memory, observation, imagination, thinking, judgment, etc.
1.(person2point1)Our main point is IQ is more important than EQ because IQ is the basis, the
source, or to say the fundamental of success.
2.（person1point2）IQ is more important than EQ because The modern society need high IQ.
Einstein is a good example, he is not good at dealing with others, but discovered the great theory of special and general relativity. It actually just reveals his high concentration on science research that he even has no time left for interpersonal interactions. They are not good at managing emotions, but they’re really interested in their research that the passion has surpassed the rest of life.
3.（person1point1）One point we want to emphasize especially is that IQ can’t be narrowly
defined, it’s not a simple number that produced by a test machine. It is not born to be fixed or inherent but contains the experience and knowledge that can be developed by learning.
Just like Darwin said, “I can succeed on science, due to my love to science and constant observation, thinking and practice.” He is not born to be an intelligent scientist but through efforts
4.(Person2point1support) 5 Warring States period, the famous politician Su Qin was quite good
at getting along with others and lobbied around in many countries which seems credited his success for high EQ. But seldom do people know that at a young age, due to his limited knowledge, Su Qin went to many places to do things, but the result was he couldn’t be taken seriously by others. After that, he knew the importance of knowledge, so, every day he got "the head hang beam, the awl stab”to study hard and eventually became an outstanding politician.
可能的rebuttal:
The opponent friend narrow understands the definition of IQ, what IQ is? IQ is a measurement of a man’s understanding on objective things and the ability to use the knowledge solve actual problems. It is the product of the interaction of three factors ：inherent quality, education and individual effort. So, please don't narrowly get IQ understood as a fixed and innate quality.
1.The argument is which is more important, not which is not important. We admit EQ do make
sense to one’s success, but IQ is the fundamental which is more crucial.
2.The progress of the society is relying on the progress of science and technology, if there is no
social progress, to talk about personal success is meaningless and it’s a nonsense. Can the primitive society give you any space self develop or any objective conditions for success? 3.If a company can be operated well only with a group of people with high emotional
intelligence, then who takes responsibility for product research and improvement? Then why we still need so-called professional talents? After all, the think-tank is the core of a company that promise the company constant survival in fierce market competition to bring source and energy.。