雅思写作政府类专题
- 格式:doc
- 大小:48.00 KB
- 文档页数:17
雅思大作文6分范文In recent years, the issue of environmental protection has attracted increasing attention from the public. Some people believe that individuals should take more responsibility for protecting the environment, while others argue that it is the government's duty to address this issue. In my opinion, both individuals and the government should work together to protect the environment.On the one hand, individuals play a crucial role in environmental protection. Every person can contribute to the environment in their daily lives by reducing, reusing, and recycling. For example, using reusable bags instead of plastic bags, conserving water and electricity, and sorting and recycling waste can all make a difference. Additionally, individuals can also participate in environmental conservation activities, such as tree planting and beach clean-ups, to help preserve the natural environment. Therefore, it is important for everyone to be aware of their impact on the environment and take steps to minimize it.On the other hand, the government also has a significant responsibility in protecting the environment. It is the government'sduty to create and enforce strict environmental regulations to control pollution and protect natural resources. Moreover, the government should invest in sustainable energy sources and promote green technologies to reduce carbon emissions and combat climate change. Furthermore, the government can also raise public awareness through educational campaigns and provide incentives for businesses to adopt environmentally friendly practices. Without the government's intervention, it would be difficult to achieve significant progress in environmental protection on a larger scale.In conclusion, both individuals and the government have important roles to play in environmental protection. While individuals can make a difference through their daily actions and choices, the government's policies and regulations are essential for addressing larger environmental issues. Therefore, it is crucial for both parties to work together in order to create a sustainable and healthy environment for future generations.。
目录1. 政府是否该支持本土电影 (2)2. 外国游客应该比本地游客花更多钱 (3)3. 现代社会的人变得更独立还是更不独立 (4)4. 选择工作最重要的考虑因素是薪水 (5)5. 动物实验是否应该禁止 (6)6. 政府是否应该支持艺术工作者 (7)7. 青少年是否应该无偿为社区工作 (8)8. 我们为什么需要音乐 (9)9. 电脑游戏是好还是坏呢 (10)10. 平均寿命变长的原因和应对方法 (11)11. 我们应该只关心自己的国家吗 (12)12. 科技是如何影响人们的日常交流的 (13)13. 兴趣爱好应该是很困难的 (14)14. 平等社会和个人成就之间的关系 (15)15. 大学每个科目的男生女生数量应该相等 (16)16. 博物馆的目的应该是娱乐还是教育 (17)17. 应该上大学还是应该直接找工作 (18)18. 政府是否应该出钱保护濒危语言 (19)19. 环境污染的方式以及政府和个人能够做什么 (20)20. 为何幸福很难定义以及如何获得幸福 (21)21. 你是否同意保护野生动物是浪费资源 (22)22. 严厉惩罚交通肇事能提高行驶安全吗 (23)23. 企业除了赚钱以外要承担社会责任 (24)24. 政府如何让城市生活更美好 (25)25. 现在人们更喜欢独居了是好还是坏呢 (26)26. 大学生应该学习自己喜欢的还是对社会有用的 (27)27. 让罪犯用亲身经历告诉青少年不要犯罪 (28)28. 传统思想在当代是否还有用武之地 (29)1.政府是否该支持本土电影Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?范文:It is true that foreign films are more popular in many countries than domestically produced films. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that governments should promote local film-making by subsidising the industry.There are various reasons why many people find foreign films more enjoyable than the films produced in their own countries. Firstly, the established film industries in certain countries have huge budgets for action, special effects and to shoot scenes in spectacular locations. Hollywood blockbusters like ‘Avatar’ or the James Bond films are examples of such productions and the global appeal that they have. Another reason why these big-budget films are so successful is that they often star the most famous actors and actresses, and they are made by the most accomplished producers and directors. The poor quality, low-budget filmmaking in many countries suffers in comparison.In my view, governments should support local film industries financially. In every country, there may be talented amateur film-makers who just need to be given the opportunity to prove themselves. To compete with big-budget productions from overseas, these people need money to pay for film crews, actors and a host of other costs related to producing high-quality films. If governments did help with these costs, they would see an increase in employment in the film industry, income from film sales, and perhaps even a rise in tourist numbers. New Zealand, for example, has seen an increase in tourism related to the 'Lord of the Rings' films, which were partly funded by government subsidies.In conclusion, I believe that increased financial support could help to raise the quality of locally made films and allow them to compete with the foreign productions that currently dominate the market.(295 words, band 9)2.外国游客应该比本地游客花更多钱Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea.The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them.If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the n ation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.(269 words, band 9)3.现代社会的人变得更独立还是更不独立Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.People have different views about whether we are more or less dependent on others nowadays. In my view, modern life forces us to be more independent than people were in the past.There are two main reasons why it could be argued that we are more dependent on each other now. Firstly, life is more complex and difficult, especially because the cost of living has increased so dramatically. For example, young adults tend to rely on their parents for help when buying a house. Property prices are higher than ever, and without help it would be impossible for many people to pay a deposit and a mortgage. Secondly, people seem to be more ambitious nowadays, and they want a better quality of life for their families. This means that both parents usually need to work full-time, and they depend on support from grandparents and babysitters for child care. However, I would agree with those who believe that people are more independent these days. In most countries, families are becoming smaller and more dispersed, which means that people cannot count on relatives as much as they used to. We also have more freedom to travel and live far away from our home towns. For example, many students choose to study abroad instead of going to their local university, and this experience makes them more independent as they learn to live alone. Another factor in this growing independence is technology, which allows us to work alone and from any part of the world.In conclusion, while there are some reasons to believe that people now depend on each other more, my own view is that we are more independent than ever.4.选择工作最重要的考虑因素是薪水When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Many people choose their jobs based on the size of the salary offered. Personally, I disagree with the idea that money is the key consideration when deciding on a career, because I believe that other factors are equally important. On the one hand, I agree that money is necessary in order for people to meet their basic needs. For example, we all need money to pay for housing, food, bills, health care, and education. Most people consider it a priority to at least earn a salary that allows them to cover these needs and have a reasonable quality of life. If people chose their jobs based on enjoyment or other non-financial factors, they might find it difficult to support themselves. Artists and musicians, for instance, are known for choosing a career path that they love, but that does not always provide them with enough money to live comfortably and raise a family.Nevertheless, I believe that other considerations are just as important as what we earn in our jobs. Firstly, personal relationships and the atmosphere in a workplace are extremely important when choosing a job. Having a good manager or friendly colleagues, for example, can make a huge difference to workers’ levels of happiness and general quality of life. Secondly, many people’s f eelings of job satisfaction come from their professional achievements, the skills they learn, and the position they reach, rather than the money they earn. Finally, some people choose a career because they want to help others and contribute something positive to society.In conclusion, while salaries certainly affect people’s choice of profession, I do not believe that money outweighs all other motivators.5.动物实验是否应该禁止Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research. On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.(270 words, band 9)6.政府是否应该支持艺术工作者Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources. Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.7.青少年是否应该无偿为社区工作Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? Many young people work on a volunteer basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion we should not make this compulsory.(250 words, band 9)8.我们为什么需要音乐There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?It is true that a rich variety of musical styles can be found around the world. Music is a vital part of all human cultures for a range of reasons, and I would argue that traditional music is more important than modern, international music.Music is something that accompanies all of us throughout our lives. As children, we are taught songs by our parents and teachers as a means of learning language, or simply as a form of enjoyment. Children delight in singing with others, and it would appear that the act of singing in a group creates a connection between participants, regardless of their age. Later in life, people’s musical preferences develop, and we come to see our favourite songs as part of our life stories. Music both expresses and arouses emotions in a way that words alone cannot. In short, it is difficult to imagine life without it.In my opinion, traditional music should be valued over the international music that has become so popular. International pop music is often catchy and fun, but it is essentially a commercial product that is marketed and sold by business people. Traditional music, by contrast, expresses the culture, customs and history of a country. Traditional styles, such as ...(example)..., connect us to the past and form part of our cultural identity. It would be a real pity if pop music became so predominant that these national styles disappeared.In conclusion, music is a necessary part of human existence, and I believe that traditional music should be given more importance than international music. (261 words, band 9)9.电脑游戏是好还是坏呢Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits?Many people, and children in particular, enjoy playing computer games. While I accept that these games can sometimes have a positive effect on the user, I believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact.On the one hand, video games can be both entertaining and educational. Users, or gamers, are transported into virtual worlds which are often more exciting and engaging than real-life pastimes. From an educational perspective, these games encourage imagination and creativity, as well as concentration, logical thinking and problem solving, all of which are useful skills outside the gaming context. Furthermore, it has been shown that computer simulation games can improve users’ motor skills and help to prepare them for re al-world tasks, such as flying a plane.However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Gaming can be highly addictive because users are constantly given scores, new targets and frequent rewards to keep them playing. Many children now spend hours each day trying to progress through the levels of a game or to get a higher score than their friends. This type of addiction can have effects ranging from lack of sleep to problems at school, when homework is sacrificed for a few more hours on the computer or console. The rise in obesity in recent years has also been linked in part to the sedentary lifestyle and lack of exercise that often accompany gaming addiction.In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more significant than the possible benefits.(258 words, band 9)10.平均寿命变长的原因和应对方法In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations.It is true that people in industrialised nations can expect to live longer than ever before. Although there will undoubtedly be some negative consequences of this trend, societies can take steps to mitigate these potential problems. As people live longer and the populations of developed countries grow older, several related problems can be anticipated. The main issue is that there will obviously be more people of retirement age who will be eligible to receive a pension. The proportion of younger, working adults will be smaller, and governments will therefore receive less money in taxes in relation to the size of the population. In other words, an ageing population will mean a greater tax burden for working adults. Further pressures will include a rise in the demand for healthcare, and the fact young adults will increasingly have to look after their elderly relatives.There are several actions that governments could take to solve the problems described above. Firstly, a simple solution would be to increase the retirement age for working adults, perhaps from 65 to 70. Nowadays, people of this age tend to be healthy enough to continue a productive working life. A second measure would be for governments to encourage immigration in order to increase the number of working adults who pay taxes. Finally, money from national budgets will need to be taken from other areas and spent on vital healthcare, accommodation and transport facilities for the rising numbers of older citizens.In conclusion, various measures can be taken to tackle the problems that are certain to arise as the populations of countries grow older.(265 words, band 9)11.我们应该只关心自己的国家吗We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Some people believe that we should not help people in other countries as long as there are problems in our own society. I disagree with this view because I believe that we should try to help as many people as possible.On the one hand, I accept that it is important to help our neighbours and fellow citizens. In most communities there are people who are impoverished or disadvantaged in some way. It is possible to find homeless people, for example, in even the wealthiest of cities, and for those who are concerned about this problem, there are usually opportunities to volunteer time or give money to support these people. In the UK, people can help in a variety of ways, from donating clothing to serving free food in a soup kitchen. As the problems are on our doorstep, and there are obvious ways to help, I can understand why some people feel that we should prioritise local charity.At the same time, I believe that we have an obligation to help those who live beyond our national borders. In some countries the problems that people face are much more serious than those in our own communities, and it is often even easier to help. For example, when children are dying from curable diseases in African countries, governments and individuals in richer countries can save lives simply by paying for vaccines that already exist. A small donation to an international charity might have a much greater impact than helping in our local area.In conclusion, it is true that we cannot help everyone, but in my opinion national boundaries should not stop us from helping those who are in need. (280 words, band 9)12.科技是如何影响人们的日常交流的Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion there are both positive and negative effects.Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these ‘virtual’ relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionised communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.13.兴趣爱好应该是很困难的Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Some hobbies are relatively easy, while others present more of a challenge. Personally, I believe that both types of hobby can be fun, and I therefore disagree with the statement that hobbies need to be difficult in order to be enjoyable.On the one hand, many people enjoy easy hobbies. One example of an activity that is easy for most people is swimming. This hobby requires very little equipment, it is simple to learn, and it is inexpensive. I remember learning to swim at my local swimming pool when I was a child, and it never felt like a demanding or challenging experience. Another hobby that I find easy and fun is photography. In my opinion, anyone can take interesting pictures without knowing too much about the technicalities of operating a camera. Despite being straightforward, taking photos is a satisfying activity.On the other hand, difficult hobbies can sometimes be more exciting. If an activity is more challenging, we might feel a greater sense of satisfaction when we manage to do it successfully. For example, film editing is a hobby that requires a high level of knowledge and expertise. In my case, it took me around two years before I became competent at this activity, but now I enjoy it much more than I did when I started. I believe that many hobbies give us more pleasure when we reach a higher level of performance because the results are better and the feeling of achievement is greater.In conclusion, simple hobbies can be fun and relaxing, but difficult hobbies can be equally pleasurable for different reasons.14.平等社会和个人成就之间的关系In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits. What is your view of the relationship between equality and personal success?In my opinion, an egalitarian society is one in which everyone has the same rights and the same opportunities. I completely agree that people can achieve more in this kind of society.Education is an important factor with regard to personal success in life. I believe that all children should have access to free schooling, and higher education should be either free or affordable for all those who chose to pursue a university degree. In a society without free schooling or affordable higher education, only children and young adults from wealthier families would have access to the best learning opportunities, and they would therefore be better prepared for the job market. This kind of inequality would ensure the success of some but harm the prospects of others.I would argue that equal rights and opportunities are not in conflict with people’s freedom to succeed or fail. In other words, equality does not mean that people lose their motivation to succeed, or that they are not allowed to fail. On the contrary, I believe that most people would feel more motivated to work hard and reach their potential if they thought that they lived in a fair society. Those who did not make the same effort would know that they had wasted their opportunity. Inequality, on the other hand, would be more likely to demotivate people because they would know that the odds of success were stacked in favour of those from privileged backgrounds.In conclusion, it seems to me that there is a positive relationship between equality and personal success.(260 words)15.大学每个科目的男生女生数量应该相等Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?In my opinion, men and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea of accepting equal proportions of each gender in every university subject.Having the same number of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. Student numbers on any course depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it would need enough applicants of each gender. In reality, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty per cent of the places needed to go to males.Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I also believe that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. Universities should continue to select the best candidates for each course according to their qualifications. In this way, both men and women have the same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful if they work hard to achieve good grades at school. If a female student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.(265 words, band 9)。
慎小嶷:十天突破雅思写作范文大赏精研优秀范文而后反复练习反复修改是雅思写作提升的不二之途。
下面小编给大家带来慎小嶷雅思写作范文赏析,烤鸭加油。
【慎小嶷——十天突破雅思写作】政府类真题7分范文政府类真题【Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their ideas. To what extent do you agree?】第四类真题政府类真题来啦~On the contrary, sometimes these artists tend to be unscrupulous. They convert rumors into facts and present them before us. This might impair the reputation of some illustrious people in today's society. On such occasions, certain restrictions are understandable. Nevertheless, we all do know what is right or wrong. Rules and regulations not always are the solution to how artists present their own ideas. Hence it is wrong-headed to be impetuous and the government should enforce alternative ways to control the media. Respect for one's ideas is not only hypothetical, but must be practised. It is through respect that each one of us can be recognised as a unique person in the world. This can be achieved by looking at the bright side of what the media display for us. Not a day can go by when we don't look out for colorful dreams and a beautiful life when we can find either through music, poetry, films, pictures everything that the creative artists offer us.有些情况下这些艺术家会有些违反道德,他们把流言当做事实来呈现到我们面前。
雅思为各位考生推荐复习材料-剑桥雅思4Test3写作task2要点解析,需要本单元其他阅读篇目的同学,请点击:剑桥雅思阅读4Test1阅读passage1译文;剑桥雅思4Test2阅读passage2原文+译文:澳大利亚的另类疗法。
Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
1. 话题和题型分类
政府类,同意不同意型
2. 题目分析
创作艺术家自由表达观点是否应该受到政府控制
3. 思路提示
A. 同意
有些艺术观点危害大众利益,需要受到限制
部分不当观点具有煽动性,不利于社会稳定
有的艺术创作内容不适宜特定人群欣赏,应该予以指导
B. 不同意
百花齐放、百家争鸣代表了思想的自由和繁荣
自由表达艺术观点可以推动新概念的诞生
欣赏者可以从更大的范围中选择自己可以从中受启发的艺术观点。
英语考试作文雅思写作高分攻略:雅思写作题目类型及思路分析进入雅思备考冲刺阶段,很多考生虽然做到了写作练习,但写作上依然存在很多问题,以至于越练越迷茫。
小站雅思君建议考生按照雅思写作题目类型复习和训练,对于雅思写作有一个全局的把握。
雅思写作题目类型:教育类 1. 教育应该包括哪些内容?母题:It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well-being of societies. What should education consist of to fulfil both these functions? (050312提示:本题围绕教育的两大功能来展开(个人与社会),准备好这篇文章,即可应付教育类话题中的最大分支—教育的功能,做到以不变应万变。
对于社会角度,可以从促进经济发展、增加社会流动性(social mobility)、维护社会稳定这几个方面来展开,对于个人,可以写改变思维模式、有利于就业和便利生活来写。
子题:大学应当教授理论知识还是实践技能?大学的是应当把学生培养成合格的公民还是让他们自己得益?准备未来职业最好的方法是上大学还是尽快离校积累工作经验?大学要不要扩招?中学阶段应当提供通才教育还是专才教育?要不要延长义务教育年限?要不要让农村地区的学生更容易上学?老师要教学生如何判断是非吗?2. 学校的科目谁来选择?母题:Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion. (060916)提示:这类题目采取的策略就是“双批判”,因为题目中提供的两种选择往往都是错误的。
雅思写作大作文范文雅思写作讨论双方观点 economic progress经济发展今天我们雅思写作大作文范文的文章来研究下经济发展。
无论在哪个国家,经济发展都是政府的主要目标之一。
其带来的好处是显而易见的。
一个地区的经济越繁荣,其人民就越有钱,政府就有更多的收入,从而可以提升公共设施和服务的水平。
反而言之,如果一个城市的经济陷入停滞,甚至是倒退,那么这个城市很容易出现社会动荡,治安不良等情况。
但是,政府是否应该只以经济发展为目标呢?换句话说,它是否应该重视环境保护,公民福利,社会进步呢?小编搜集了一篇相应的考官范文,以供大家参考。
雅思写作大作文题目Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.许多政府认为经济发展是他们最为重要的目标。
然而,一些人认为其他方面的发展对于一个国家而言同样重要。
讨论双方观点,并给出你自己的意见。
雅思写作大作文范文People have different views about how governments should measure their countries’progress. While economic progress is, of course, essential, I agree with those who believe that other measures of progress are just as important.人们对于政府应该如何衡量国家的进步持有不同的看法。
英语作文政府支付大学学费篇一:雅思写作头脑风暴:政府支付大学学费智课网IELTS备考资料雅思写作头脑风暴:政府支付大学学费摘要:今天小编为大家带来的主要内容是雅思写作头脑风暴:政府支付大学学费的内容,供大家参考,希望大家能从中得到好的学习方法。
今天小编为大家带来的主要内容是雅思写作头脑风暴:政府支付大学学费的内容,希望大家通过今天小编为大家带来的内容能好好的提高自己的雅思写作成绩。
作文题目IELTS 88The government should pay for the course fees for everyone who wants to study at the university. To what extent do you agree or disagree?题目翻译有人认为政府应该为每一个想在大学学习的人支付学费。
你是否同意,或部分同意这种观点?题目分析这道题目要注意几个关键词:“每一个”、“大学”。
是不是应该为每一个想上的人都支付学费?支付大学的学费和支付其它学费还不一样,因为大学教育是精英教育。
头脑风暴1. 你的国家会为学生支付学费到什么时候?查一下这个政策是如何确立下来的。
用户回答参考:●到初中毕业。
我们国家实施的是九年义务教育,也就是说国家会免费为少年儿童提供义务教育到初中毕业。
1986年4月我国颁布了《中华人民共和国义务教育法》。
这是我国首次把免费的义务的教育用法律的形式固定下来,也就是说适龄的“儿童和少年”必须接受9年的义务教育。
●我们国家实施的是九年义务教育,也就是说国家会免费为少年儿童提供义务教育到初中毕业。
1986年4月我国颁布了《中华人民共和国义务教育法》。
这是我国首次把免费的义务的教育用法律的形式固定下来,也就是说适龄的“儿童和少年”必须接受9年的义务教育。
2. 如果说政府应该为大学生支付学费,你觉得是为什么?用户回答参考:●我觉得那是因为为公民提供教育、交通、医疗等各种基础设施是政府的职责。
Trade and travel would be a lot easier with a single, global currency that we all use.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Would a single currency cause any problems?It is clear to me that the idea of a single global currency is an excellent ideal to work towards. There can be no doubt that trade and travel would be vastly easier. On the other hand I believe that it would cause problems today.The benefits of a single currency can be seen with the use in Europe of the Euro. Whenever you are travelling between countries using the Euro, the problems of currency changing and exchange rates are history. Similarly business between countries using the Euros is so much easier; no more worrying about exchange rate risk and pricing. Everyon e‛s money is the same. The same thing is true with the US dollar. Most countries do not use the US dollar but it is accepted in many places. There are many countries that you can travel to and just take US dollars to use.At present though a global currency would be impossible. Firstly most countries would not accept the idea. Secondly all countries are in different economic states. Some are economically very strong and some are in a state of collapse with inflation ruining the economy. Such countries could not be brought into a world currency as it would cause massive financial instability worldwide. So it is clear that a global currency would indeed cause some serious problems.So, in conclusion I see a global currency as a future ideal but it will not happen in my lifetime. It would make trade and travel much easier but the problems it would cause nowadays would be insurmountable.我很清楚,一个单一的全球货币的想法是一个理想的工作。
写作部分题目观点与思路A 类1.政府是否应该资助理科生,因为科学家为社会贡献大。
For:1.The social development is based on science, as any high technological product derives from scientific theories.2.The payment for those who are engaged in science is still at a low level, which should be changed. Therefore, the support from the government is indispensable.3.Emphasis from the government will ignite the passion of citizens so that science will be promoted to a higher level.Against:Science and arts should be placed equally1.Itcannot b e deniedthatthe m odernmaterial aspect o f civilizationis createdby the modern technology. It is scientists’ hard work that prospers the material life.2.Our life is greatly enriched by the works of arts, such as literature, painting and mu1233.Without the contribution from the workers of the arts, such as social workers, litterateurs and legist, the society cannot remain healthy, peaceful and stable, and people cannot engage in the scientific work in a good environment. Therefore, it is necessary to put equal emphasis on the science and arts.2、衡量政府成功是否以经济繁荣为标志?For:1.The economy is the criterion of a country or government’s success.2.The economy is the fundamental of everything.3.Without economic prosperity, happiness is just the castle in the air.4.The economic situation is the most objective criterion.5.A powerful economy is the cornerstone of social development. With a strong economy, we can have a comprehensive welfare system accessible to all citizens.6.With a sound economy, our people will have sufficient access to free medical care and education.7.Alongwith e co n o m ic prosperity, our national defensesystemwill be g reatly enhanced.Against:1.The criter ion of a country or government’s success should be citizens’ satisfaction to the country or the g overnment.2.The criterion of a country or government’s success should be the country’s comprehensive strength.3.With money while devoid of sense of security, life will become dull and monotonous.4.M o n e y is o m n ip o t e n t,so t h at e co n o m ic le ve l isn’t e ve ryt h in go f a co u nt ry.5.Without a sense of security, a democratic atmosphere, economic prosperity doesn't mean everything.6.It is not uncommon that in some countries that boast so-called economic prosperity, corruption and discrimination are prevalent.3、强迫退休制度For:1.Every one is human with limited energy and vigor; therefore, after an exhaustingworkinglife, one tends to beincreasingly slow bothinmindand action. Remaining in one’s post would undoubtedly impair one’s physical and emotional health.2.When one reaches an old age, he/she tends to be more conservative and reluctant to accept new ideas and innovations. They are likely to adhere to past practices and old ways. One’s originality and creativity will dry out. They always hesitate to strive forward.3.Too many old people remaining in high positions will hinder the developmentof society.4.Offer more employment opportunities and promotion to the young so that they will be able to give full play to their talent.5.If one never stops working, what’s the point of life?Against:1.Different occupations have their diverse traits and distinguishing features. Some jobs call for special psychological requirements. For example, professors, doctors and research fellows are always required to work into their seventies for their richexperience and a cademic achievements, while professional athletes, suchas gymnasts, retire even at the age of twenty.2.Some people think working gives them the mentalsatis fa ct io n/co nte n t me n t anda role in society. If they areobligedtowithdraw from work to complete domesticity, they will feel that they are abandoned by the society and useless. Work brings social and personal esteem.3.It is regarded as a breadwinning process. Retirement will bring about some financial troubles.4.It is unfair to some people who have studied for years to obtain a higher degree. If they are required to retire at the same age as those who receive shorter schooling, the y ca n n o t e njoy thesame l engthof working. It i s also a great waste of talents.5.Thanks to the improvement in medical science, people enjoy a much life sp an/e xp e cta n cy.W e sh ou ld r e d e fin e t h e t e rm“o ld a g e”.6.Chronological age is not always a true indicator of one’s capabilities.7.It would be more economical to some employers to retain the old hands than to spend more time and money training greenhands.8.Older workers usually are more stable, skilled and experienced than younger ones. It is deemed as an economic asset.Conclusion/suggestion:1.One’s retirement age should be decided according to one’s own conditions and willingness. We shall adopt aflexible andrational retirement age sothat different age can have a chance to give play to their talents and wisdom.2.We should implement the policy of mandatory retirement, because it really brings us a good many benefits. The policy is not only good to the old, but also beneficial to the young.4、体罚是否为好的教育方式FOR:1.We should teach children to respect discipline.2.Discipline is the basis of all achievement.3.Children are hardy creatures.4.It moulds strong a n d r eal character.5.It helps to reinforce the authority of teachers and parents.6.Sometimes children will test the patience of their parents and teacher; teachers and parents should not be too permissive; otherwise they will spoil the children.7.Permissiveness results in undisciplined children.8.Parental laxity leads to the spread of juvenile delinquency.Against:1.Children shouldn’t be exposed to parental abuse (emotionally and physically).2.It seriously violates the legal rights and interests of children.3.It is tremendously cold-blooded and unhealthy, resulting in life-long adverse/negative repercussions/rebellious reaction.4.It endangers children’ physical and mental development.5.N o t“yo usp aret h e ro d”b u t“sp are”t h e“re act io nan d a t t e n t io n”an dyou spoil the child. We should employ moderate and appropriate discipline.6.It i s a kind o f brutality and c ruelty whichmay lead t o i njury or evendeathofthe student.7.Achieve the reverse r esult.8.Researchreveals that s t u d e n t s who s uffer fromcorporal p u n i s h m e n t t endtoresort to violence in their future life.5、小孩是学会竞争还是合作For Competition:petition is inevitable; it’s human nature.petition builds character; it strengthens our self-esteem.petition is regarded a s anopenand f air race where success goes to t he swiftest people regardless of their social status.petition is required to help us reach our fullest potential.5.Natural selection and survival of the fittest.For Cooperation:1.Cooperation offers us a break from the pressure and stress of competition.2.A win-win approach tends to fosters exploration of the root causes of the conflict and leads to constructive, sustainable solutions with positive expectation for future encounters.3.Cooperative g r o u p s display more coordinatedefforts, more divisionof labor, more acceptance of other ideas, and fewer communication difficulties than competitive groups.4.Two heads are better than one.5.Cooperation is marvelously successful at helping children to communicate effectively, to trust in others and to accept those who are different from themselves.6、广泛使用机器人是好事还是坏事For:1.The employment of robots on assembly lines saves a lots of labor forces.2.This trend not only improves the work efficiency, but also enhances accuracy.3.Robots can take the place of human beings and work in the dangerous environment or the places not accessible for us.4.Robots can work around the clock, never knowing tiredness.Against:1.As robots are designed by human beings, what they do is just to follow the instruction and preset programming by human being.2.Once there is something wrong with the electric or programms, robot willbecome a good-to-nothing machine.3.Robots cannot work creatively when confronted with complicated situations.4.With the excessive dependence on robots, human beings will degenerate into a kind of animals that only to take food.7、明星高薪是否合理?For:1.The stars are talented p eople.2.Their brilliant performances enrich people’s cultural/spiritual life, which partly contributes to the spiritual c ivilization.3.They bring great pleasure and happiness to ordinary people. They make money by means of their skills and they deserve it. No one forces you to pay for his/her performance. Both are willing.4.Some of the stars also have undergone painstaking training and practice. No pains, nogains. The road t o s uccess m a y not be easy for m ost p op s tars, whichmay set examples for the youngsters.5.Different occupations or professions can command a different amount ofmoney.6.They sacrifice a lot for what they gain including privacy.7.They bring benefits to the tertiary industry and prosper some professions like entertainment and related ventures.8.It is an inevitable outcome of the market economy. We should not make a fuss of it. It is decided by the market.Against:1.We should value the talents who promote the welfare of the society as a whole rather than these pop s tars.2.We c anlive without p opstars, but c ann ot w ithout a doctor or a teacher. Our society can proceed well without these stars.3.The value of knowledge is depreciating.4.Discourage /strike the initiative and zeal of people in other fields.5.Impose an adverse influence on the development of the next generation, which may easily become m oney-oriented.6.This phenomenon, to some extent, even contaminates the order of theday/general mood.7.What they pay cannot equal their gain.8.They make little contribution to the development of the society compared with the scientists.9.Withthe quick- earned money the pop star’s vanity may quickly expand and their souls may be distorted.Conclusion:It is essential that effective measures should be taken to redress such inequality and disparity. The government should levy heavier income tax on these stars in order to narrow the gap between the income of so-called pop stars and that of the ordinary professions such as doctors and teachers.G 类1. 妇女犯罪1.Th e rap idd e ve lo p m e n t o f so cie t y an dt h ech an g e s o f p e o p le’s va lu e o f t h eworld account mainly for the i ssue.2.With the eye-catching development of economy, many young women go out to find a job, which renders them more opportunities to contact the outsideworld.3.Women’s quality attributes partly to the rise of criminal rate.4.The prosperity and luxury in some metropolises are very attractive to some young women.5.Some of women leave the countryside in the hope that they can make a good fortune in the cities, where they often find themselves disappointed for lack of good education or skills.6.The over-description of violence on the media leads young women astray.Suggestion:1.The government should pay more attention to the problem and issue relevant laws to crack down young women crimes.2.We should strengthen education and raise the quality of people, helping them set up a correct outlook of the world.2. 家庭和睦问题Causes:1.Mobility. Nowadays many jobs require workers who are ready and able tomove off the land and to move again whenever necessary.2.Changes in customs and habits have a significant impact on people’s concept of and attitude towards familial life.3.Fierce competition. One has to work and study hard tomeet the d e m a n d of society and face the challenge. Both husband and wife have to go out workfull-t im e t o s u p p o rtt h e fam ily.To o o ccu p ie d t osp are t im e fo r o n e’s fam ily.4.In t his busy modernworld i nwhichmaterial thi ng s are muchvalued, peopleare attaching less importance to emotion and therefore are growing more and more isolated and i ndifferent.5.While fast urban development enables people to enjoy better living conditions, people have to spend more on commuting every day.Suggestion:1.Keep this line of communication open. Frank exchanges are of great importance.2.Eat a s a family. Dinner is a valuable o pportuni ty for the f amily to s pend t imet o g e t h e r.3.Never bring your office work home, and always keep in mind that home is home.4.Share the same p astimes.5.A loving atmosphere. Do what you can to create a tranquil harmonious home.6.When you are out, make sure that you call home regularly.3. 新生总是会由不适应的问题,为什么,如何解决Causes:1.Part of the difficulties they face over this period is due to a changed academic environment.2.When proceeding to a university or a new school overseas, a student may face a different set of academic norms and expectations.3.Challenges also come from their peers. To ensure that their study performance is equal to or better than their fellow students, they need to work very hard, under great psychological pressure.4.For many students, this may be their first foray beyond the borders of the family home, perhaps living in another city or country.5.These new students are likely to find it hard to get used to and blend into the local culture, especially in the case of overseas students.Suggestion:1.School authorities may play an important role in helping students to settlein.2.The orientation program could last long enough to enable students to feelat home.3.Such programs should be on a more individual basis so that new studentscan get a clearer picture of school rules and facilities.4.It would be a good idea for schools to organize some excursions andoutings during the first days.4.私立学校Public School1、 Public education is the fundamental way to prepare children from diverse ethnic,religious ,and class backgrounds to live as responsible citizens in ademocracy 。
雅思写作高分范文(21篇)雅思写作高分篇1也许是交通问题已经困扰世界各国人民太久了,所以各国政府都纷纷在交通建设和改善方面做出了不小的努力。
但是对于政府花钱建设更多的铁路而不是公路这样的`观点,我本人表示不能完全赞成。
It is perhaps the long-disturbing traffic issue that drives governments all over the globe to make great efforts in establishing or improving theirtraffic system. Nevertheless, I still cannot be enrolled in the camp that claims it is wise to construct railway rather than roads. (45 words)首先,我不得不承认修建铁路在某种程度上是一件利国利民的事情。
毕竟与其他交通方式相比,铁路运输的单位时间运载量最大,陆路运输速度最快。
同时,由于铁路运输依靠强大的运营系统控制其运行,几乎不会造成交通拥堵。
显然,修建铁路是一件有益的事情。
Undoubtedly, the railway construction, in a way, can be deemed as a win-win program for both the country and its citizens. After all, pared with other types of transportation, the transporting load of railage in a unit time is the largest and it is also the fastest approach of conveyance on land. Simultaneously, due to its strikingly strong operating system in running, it can scarcely entail any congestion. Evidently, it is advantageous to implement the plan referred to railway establishment. (80 words)但无论是铁路建设还是公路建设,都要取决于很多综合因素,比如城市发展规模、人口流动范围、地址环境等等。
政府类一、定语从句(任意挑两个翻译)1. International aid agencies helping the victims of the devastating cyclone in Burma are losing as much as a fifth of the money that t hey bring into the country because of arbitrary foreign exchange rules imposed by military dictatorship.2. This is a significant boost to the billions already spent by government and the energy companies and means we can now get this vital extra support to the people who really need it in time for the coldest months this winter.3. The Business and Enterprise Committee is due to publish the conclusions of its report on Monday and many in the industry fear that it will call for a Competition Commission inquiry into the sector, which is already under scrutiny from Ofgem in a separate investigation.4. Under the measures, which will be implemented by the end of the year, teenage foreign brides and bridegrooms will be barred from entering Britain on marriage visas. The minimum age at which British citizens can sponsor a foreigner to enter the countryas a spouse is to rise from 18 to 21, as is the minimum age at which a bride or groom can themselves enter on a marriage visa.5. Parents whose children download music and films illegally will be blacklisted and have their Internet access curbed under government reforms to fight online piracy.6. The Anglo-French group, whose shares fell 10 per cent yesterday, believe the strategy is the only way to encourage passengers to make more journeys through the under-used tunnel, which faces a cash crunch in 2006 when government subsidies run out at the same time that the debt repayments ratchet up.7. The evidence suggests that this is exactly what is now happening. Americans are driving less and buying more fuel-efficient cars. Demand growth is slowing in Europe and should even start to moderate in China and India, where government-controlled petrol prices have been raised.8. It was Harold Wilson’s ambition to make Labor the natural party of government. Under the leadership of Tony Blair, this ambition came close to becoming a reality. There was a good reason why it did so.二、核心词汇Public servicesGovernment borrowingResourcesRegulationLegislatorFinanceCriterionProvinceState Development Planning CommissionMinistry of ConstructionThe problem of employmentThe strategy of invigorating China through the development of science and educationScientific verificationExpand/increase domestic demand and stimulate consumptionHealth care reformOverall national strengthWelfareValueDrop out of schoolReeducationOffenderTourUnder-developed regionNatural reserveFree medical careInfrastructureGuaranteeTaxImmigrationLegalizationLaw-enforcing departmentAdvocateAdministrationSupervisionAutonomous regionMinistry of EducationLow-cost housingFundScientific and technological progress The strategy of sustainable development Stimulate economic growthAdvance with the timesTuition feeCommunity serviceCultural heritageEco-tourismMedical systemRe-employment of laid-off workers Well-beingUrban residentsReal estatePovertyBudgetAuthorityImplementSuperviseState-ownedMilitaryObligationInfrastructureInvestmentPrioritizeTax revenueEnact lawWelfare systemBasic human needspublic servicePublic transportationAffordable houseHealth care serviceImpose censorship onNon-profit organizationFinancial aidCombat corruptionBridge the gap between the rich and the poorCreate job opportunitiesImprove the quality of serviceEnsure social equality三、万能思路写作观点:政府有最大的责任。
Causes:1. Every government’s basic obligation: ensure national security, stabilize the society, enhance social welfare system, perfect the public facilities2. be able to pool and dominate various resources3. Give top priority to investments on education, technology and basic human needs, then invest in entertainment facilities to increase emotional wellbeing and enrich one’s cultural life.Eg. 1Some people think rich countries should help the poor countries by giving money directly. Others believe that there are other more effective forms of international aids. What’s your opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.提纲:观点:穷国最需要技术和人才。
原因1:科技是第一生产力。
原因2:富国可以帮助穷国培养人才。
举例:提供奖学金。
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about international aids. However, whether direct financial support of other effective forms should developed countries give to developing countries is a controversial issue. My view is that the read needs ofpoor countries are talents and technologies.First, it is obvious that technology functions as the main power in the process of a country’s development. That means without science and technology, the productivity cannot be effectively enhanced and the wealth cannot be accumulated at a high speed. So, to help the poor, we’d better give them tools of making fortune.Moreover, it is rich countries’ duty to nurture talents for poor countries in order to help them innovate independently in a long run. For example, many countries have already offered scholarships to foreign students to encourage them to accomplish their dreams. Undoubtedly, rich countries have more education resources required to be shared with poor countries, thus, all talented people can get a chance to be well-educated. That is not to say that, under no circumstances, should the rich countries provide aid in the form of money. Indeed, money helps a lot in a financial crisis or other urgent problems. But we can never ensure the financial support given will be spent efficiently under an imperfect supervision system.In conclusion,there are some other types of aids richcountries may choose to provide more efficient help. Meanwhile, if financial aid is offered, we have to make sure that the money is being spent on what people really need and not filling the pockets of corrupt politicians. Only by doing so, can the poor countries become strong soon.Eg.Some people think that good health is essential to every person, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the advantages?It is said that human beings are the only animal that is aware it will one day die. Given such knowledge, we are in a unique position to decide how we live, which in turn affects how long we live. But when we do get sick, should we be in hands of for-profit companies or government? I think ideally it should be some combination of both.For-profit insurance companies have pros and cons. On the one hand, because they want to make money, they might not agree to all the expensive treatments a sick person wants or needs. On the other hand, individuals will be motivated to stay healthy and take care of themselves so they do not have to pay such high insurance rates.Government-run healthcare is also a mixed bag. One advantage is that it ensures all people, regardless of income, have at least some basic medical coverage. The disadvantage, though, is that individuals have no incentive to take good care of their health. After all, if they eat poorly or smoke and get sick, it is not they that have to pay for it.Clearly the ideal choice would be a combination of both private and public health insurance. This way everyone can have basic coverage, but if people have the resources to buy private insurance they are free to do so and it does not place too big a burden on government.So by combining the benefits of both systems we canachieve health care that is complete and fair. This is important because in any society both the government and the individual have responsibilities. When it comes to health, we all have a part to play.Eg.Housing shortages in big cities can have severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Land supplyInterest rateCity planningHousing policyNowadays in big cities all over the world it is not uncommon to hear people complain about the cost of housing. It seems that real estate markets are often out of control and consumers have no say in the matter. As housing is a basic need, governments need to step in to protect consumer rights and make sure the markets are fair.Let us begin by considering the current financial crisis in America. This was partly caused by a real estate bubble. When housing prices go up, people think it is a quick way to get rich and they borrow more money than they should. When the prices fall, they owe more than the house is worth.Also consider that in any city there are many people with low and medium incomes. How can such people be expected to buy expensive real estate when their salaries are not all high? Clearly governments should step in and set reasonable limits on prices so that not only the super rich can afford to live in cities.If governments do not act, the consequences could be severe. If the trend continues then eventually people will stop moving to cities or only the rich will live there and both of these are unrealistic. It takes all types of people to make up a city and all people deserve affordable housing.So finally the responsibility rests with government to place reasonable controls on the real estate market. Housing should be a basic human right, like food and water, but if government does not act soon, it will be a privilege only for the rich. What a shame that would be.Eg.Some people said the government should not spend money on building theaters and sports stadiums. Instead, it should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you agree or disagree?Every government faces a similar dilemma: how it should use its limited resources in the best way. Some people think that large buildings and stadiums are perhaps a waste of money, and that it should be used for more practical things. While every country’s situation varies, generally countries should invest more in things like education and less on eye-catching landmarks.Take the Olympics for example. Of course they were a great success and gave a good impression, but after theywere finished those expensive buildings just sat there empty, after huge amounts of money were spent to build them. If we build amazing buildings but only use them once in while, what is the point?Also consider that theaters and sports stadiums are “wants’and not “needs”. Sure, everyone likes to relax and have some fun, but money should be spent on these things after the more basic and fundamental needs of a society have been met. And when we do build such facilities, we do not have to be overly extravagant—it just is not a necessity.Medical care and education, however, are incredibly important to any society. Everyone deserves to be healthy and have access to qualified doctors in order to feel safe and secure. Education allows people to work hard, save money, raise families and achieve their dreams. It is a basic need in modern society; to be educated is to be able to contribute and lead a good life.So finally, governments must separate “needs”and“wants”, and state-of-the-art sports facilities are certainly wants, not needs. All societies must make education and medical care a priority because they are the foundation for a good life. If these needs are met, we can then consider other things.Eg.Many countries have spent vast sums of money on armament for the sake of self-defense. Some people think they should spend money helping reducing poverty and other issues rather than on weapons. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Every country spends some money on self-defense and its military; it is only natural. But the important consideration is how much money should be spent? Some people think that countries should spend less on the military and more helping to reduce the gap between rich and poor. My view is that each country needs to pay attention to both and find the proper balance.Every country needs to maintain its borders and protectits people. This seems like a no-brainer. Naturally, some countries which are geographically large and share borders with many countries will need to spend more on its military budget, while others can spend less. We should also remember that military not only can be used in self-defense, but also is important in domestic emergencies and natural disasters.This is not to say, however, that we should neglect other important social issues. For a country to be stable and balanced, governments should also do what it can to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor as well as investing in other social programmes. Sometimes the biggest threat is not from other countries, but from social inequality. Government must take a balanced approach to spending its funds.In fact, there are many countries which do a good job of balancing spendin on social programmes and self-defense, like many European countries for example. Another possibility to consider is for countries to form an alliance so they can share the cost of self-defense. Bydoing so, they will have more to spend on other areas.So in the end, each country must strike a balance between dealing with international and domestic threats. Hopefully one day we will live in a more peaceful time and we will not need to spend anything on self-defense. Until then, we should aim for a reasonable middle ground.。