当前位置:文档之家› NSAIDs相关性消化性溃疡出血_省略_Ds消化性溃疡出血的临床对照研究_宗晔

NSAIDs相关性消化性溃疡出血_省略_Ds消化性溃疡出血的临床对照研究_宗晔

NSAIDs相关性消化性溃疡出血与非NSAIDs论著消化性溃疡出血的临床对照研究

宗晔赵海英王青釭吴咏冬张澍田

(首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院消化内科北京市消化疾病北京100050)

【摘要】目的探讨非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)相关性溃疡出血与非NSAIDs消化性溃疡出血的差异。方法通

过临床对照研究,比较46例NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血与88例非NSAIDs消化性溃疡出血的临床资料。结果NSAIDs组

年龄显著高于非NSAIDs组,女性患者比率高于非NSAIDs组;NSAIDs组具有心脑血管和/或风湿免疫性疾病的患者多

于非NSAIDs组,而既往具有消化性溃疡病史的患者低于非NSAIDs组;NSAIDs组上腹痛症状显著低于非NSAIDs组;

NSAIDs组发病时血糖高于非NSAIDs组;NSAIDs组胃溃疡比率显著高于非NSAIDs组。以上差异均有统计学意义(P

<0.05)。结论NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血发病年龄、性别、临床表现及溃疡的发生部位与非NSAIDs溃疡患者均有差

异,熟悉NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血的特点有利于临床诊治。

【关键词】消化性溃疡非甾体抗炎药上消化道出血

A case-control study on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)induced and NSAIDs unrelated peptic ulcer with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.ZONG Ye,ZHAO Hai-ying,WANG Qing-gang,et al.Department of Gastroenterology,Beijing Friendship Hospital,

Capital Medical University,Beijing100050,China.

【Abstract】Objective To explore the difference in clinical characteristics between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)

induced and NSAIDs unrelated peptic ulcer with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods The case-control study was used to analyze the clini-

cal data of forty-six patients with NSAIDs induced and eighty-eight patients with NSAIDs unrelated peptic ulcer with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Results The age range of patients in NSAIDs induced group was older than that of NSAIDs unrelated group.Female patients in NSAIDs

induced group were more than those in NSAIDs unrelated group.More patients in NSAIDs induced group had the history of cardio-cerebral-vas-

cular diseases or rheumatic diseases,fewer patients in NSAIDs induced group had the history of peptic ulcer and epigastric pain.The level of blood

sugar in NSAIDs induced group was higher than that of NSAIDs unrelated group.The number of patients with gastric ulcer in NSAIDs induced

group was more than that of NSAIDs unrelated group.Their difference was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion There was significant difference

between NSAIDs induced group and NSAIDs unrelated group with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in age,gender,previous history of peptic ulcer or

cardio-cerebral-vascular disease or rheumatic disease,clinical symptoms and types of ulcer.The clinical characteristics of NSAIDs induced up-

per gastrointestinal bleeding should be better understood in order to get earlier diagnosis and treatment.

【Key words】Peptic ulcer;Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs);Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

消化性溃疡出血目前仍然是上消化道出血的主要原因,而消化性溃疡出血相当一部分是由于服用非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)药物引起。那么为了进一步了解NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血的临床特点,我们进行了一项NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血与非NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血的临床对照研究。

1资料与方法

1.1临床资料2010年1月至2010年12月因黑便(血便)和∕或呕咖啡样物(呕血)在首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院行急诊内镜,确诊为消化性溃疡出血的患者纳入研究。排除食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血、消化道肿瘤等引起的消化道出血的患者。共纳入134例患者。1.2研究方法根据发病10天前是否服用NSAIDs药物分为NSAIDs组和非NSAIDs组,其中NSAIDs组46例,非NSAIDs组88例。比较两组之间一般资料、临床症状、实验室检查及内镜结果。

1.3统计学处理本研究采用SPSS统计软件进行数据分析,计数资料用个体例数及率表示,采用卡方检验;计数资料以均数?标准差(珋x?s)表示,采用t检验,P <0.05为差异有统计学意义。

2结果2.1NSAIDs组和非NSAIDs组年龄和性别的比较NSAIDs组年龄42 82岁,平均年龄(66?11)岁;非NSAIDs 组16 83岁,平均年龄(52?18)岁;NSAIDs组年龄高于非NSAIDs组,差异有统计学意义(t=5.407,P<0.05)。NSAIDs组男性32例,女性14例;非NSAIDs组男性75例,女性13例;NSAIDs组女性患者比率明显高于非NSAIDs 组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.606,P<0.05)。

2.2NSAIDs组和非NSAIDs组基础疾病的比较NSAIDs 组中,10例(21.7%)有消化性溃疡病史;34例(73.9%)有心脑血管疾病史,包括高血压病、冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病、心肌梗死、脑梗死;8例(17.4%)有风湿免疫性疾病,包括类风湿关节炎、痛风;6例(13.0%)有糖尿病。非NSAIDs 组中,40例(45.5%)有消化性溃疡病史;21例(23.9%)有心脑血管疾病史;2例(2.3%)有风湿免疫性疾病,包括类风湿关节炎、痛风;12例(13.6%)有糖尿病。两组比较,NSAIDs组具有心脑血管病史及风湿免疫疾病的患者较非NSAIDs组多(χ2分别为31.272、9.999,P<0.05),而具有消化性溃疡病史的患者较非NSAIDs患者少(χ2=7.264,P <0.05)。两组有糖尿病史的患者无显著差异(χ2=0.009,P>0.05)。

2.3NSAIDs组和非NSAIDs组临床症状的比较比较

·

828

·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Vol.11,No.11Jun.2012

两组患者上腹痛(包括上腹不适、烧灼感、空腹痛)、恶心、头晕心悸症状出现的例数,两组之间上腹痛患者的例数有显著性差异(P<0.05),其他症状两组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。见表1。

表1两组临床症状比较[例(%)]

症状NSAIDs组非NSAIDs组χ2值P值

上腹痛烧心8(17.4)33(37.5)5.7520.018

恶心6(13.0)12(13.6)0.0091.000

头晕心悸14(30.4)28(31.8)0.0271.000

2.4NSAIDs组和非NSAIDs组实验室指标的比较比较两组间患者红细胞计数、血红蛋白、血细胞比容、尿素氮、血糖、白蛋白的差异,NSAIDs组红细胞计数、血红蛋白、血细胞比容略低于非NSAIDs组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),NSAIDs组尿素氮高于非NSAIDs组,但差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05);血糖明显高于非NSAIDs组(P<0.05)。白蛋白两组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。见表2。

表2两组实验室指标的比较(珋x?s)

实验室检查NSAIDs组非NSAIDs组t值P值血红蛋白(g/L)97.00?16.0099.00?20.00-0.3020.79血红细胞计数(?1012/L)3.17?0.763.17?0.76-1.0840.33血细胞比容(%)28.33?6.7827.44?10.190.5360.54尿素氮(mmol/L)13.51?6.4511.87?6.051.4520.15血糖(mmol/L)10.52?5.298.31?2.742.6490.02白蛋白(g/L)35.12?3.7535.50?4.65-0.5030.64 2.5NSAIDs组和非NSAIDs组消化性溃疡类别的比较NSAIDs组胃溃疡19例,球溃疡21例,复合性溃疡6例;非NSAIDs组胃溃疡16例,球溃疡66例,复合性溃疡6例。NSAIDs组胃溃疡比率显著高于非NSAIDs组(χ2=10.294,P<0.05)。

3讨论

3.1NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血的临床特点本研究比较了NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血与非NSAIDs消化性溃疡出血的差异,总结了NSAIDs相关性消化性溃疡出血的临床特点:(1)NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血女性患者比率增加;以老年人多见,这与既往的报道相符[1]。其原因可能为:①老年人心脑血管疾病多,服用NSAIDs药物较年轻人多;②老年人前列腺素合成减少,黏膜血流灌注减低,上皮修复能力下降,胃黏膜的防御机制降低,服用NSAIDs容易出现消化道黏膜的损伤。(2)NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血患者出现典型的消化性溃疡的症状并不多见,常常以出血为首发症状。(3)NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血患者既往有消化性溃疡病史的少见,而多存在心脑血管疾病和/或风湿免疫性疾病。(4)NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血患者出现胃溃疡的比率明显增高。

3.2NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血的临床特点对临床诊断的意义NSAIDs组患者多数无消化性溃疡病史,且在出现消化道出血症状之前上腹规律性疼痛、烧心等消化性溃疡的表现明显低于非NSAIDs组,尤其是老年人,往往以黑便为首发症状[2],所以对于服用NSAIDs患者,根据既往史和临床表现可能不能及时地作出消化性溃疡的诊断,而对患者宣传教育,提醒患者注意大便颜色的变化,可能有助于患者的及时诊治。

非NSAIDs溃疡以十二指肠球溃疡为主,而NSAIDs 相关性溃疡胃溃疡明显增加,这是因为NSAIDs导致消化性溃疡的发病机制相关,其不仅与胃酸密切相关[3],与削弱胃黏膜的防御机制也密切相关[4],其主要通过抑制环氧化酶-1的活性,减少前列腺素的合成。所以在治疗中除了抑制胃酸的分泌外,合理地加用保护胃黏膜的药物也是非常必要的。

4结论

NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血从发病年龄、性别、临床表现及溃疡的发生部位与非NSAIDs溃疡患者均有差异,熟悉NSAIDs相关性溃疡出血的特点有利于临床诊治。参考文献

[1]张莉,吕愈敏,丁士刚,等.非甾体抗炎药相关性溃疡并出血的临床特点[J].中华消化杂志,2003,42(4):258-260.

[2]吴开春,刘震雄.非甾体类抗炎药与消化性溃疡[J].中华消化杂志,2008,28(7):439-441.

[3]Chiba T,Sato K,Kudara N,et al.Upper gastrointestinal disorders in-duced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs[J].Inflammop-

harmacology,2008,16(1):16-20.

[4]Hunt RH,Yuan Y.Acid-NSAIDs/aspirin interaction in peptic ulcer disease[J].Dig Dis,2011,29(5):465-458.

(收稿日期:2012-04-27)

櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥櫥

(上接第827页)

[2]王华燕,许国英,王宝婵,等.动态脑电图在原发性癫痫治疗过程的随访研究[J].临床神经病学杂志,2002,15(6):363-364.[3]Khan YU,Gotman J.Wavelet based automatic seizure detection in in-tracerebral electroencephalogram[J].Clin Neurophysiol,2003,114(5):898-908.

[4]张海军,王浩川,赵雨斌.基于小波包技术的EEG信号特征波提取分析[J].计算机工程与应用,2008,45(23):246-248.

[5]夏猛,张丽萍.脑电图在癫痫诊断和治疗中的研究进展[J].时珍国医国药,2006,17(5):682-683.

[6]薛杉,周谷兰,张新伟,等.皮层脑电图监测与原发性难治性癫痫手术预后相关性分析[J].实用医学杂志,2010,39(12):2074-

2076.

[7]Srinivasan V,Eswaran C,Sriraam N.Approximate entropy-based epi-leptic EEG detection using artificial neural networks[J].IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed,2007,11(3):288-295.

[8]Gigola S,Ortiz F,D'A ttellis CE,et al.Prediction of epileptic seizures using accumulated energy in a multiresolution framework[J].J Neurosci Methods,2004,138(1-2):107-111.

[9]Esteller R,Echauz J,D'A lessandro M,et al.Continuous energy varia-tion during the seizure cycle:towards an on-line accumulated energy [J].Clin Neurophysiol,2005,116(3):517-526.

(收稿日期:2011-12-13)

·

928

·

临床和实验医学杂志2012年6月第11卷第11期

相关主题
文本预览
相关文档 最新文档