GRE作文北美范文实践是成功的唯一途径
4月份GRE考试已结束，同学们需进入下轮GRE备考中，备考GRE首先要选择好的资料，GRE北美范文对备考GRE写作有一定的指导作用，下面为大家整理了最完整版的GRE北美范文，主要是关于GRE ISSUE作文范文，供大家应用。
"In any realm of life---whether academic, social, business, or political---the only way to succeed is to take a practical, rather than an idealistic, point of view. Pra gmat ic behavior guarantees survival, whereas idealistic views tend to be superceded by simpler, more immediate options."
I agree with the speaker insofar as that a practical, pragmatic approach toward our endeavors can help us survive in the short tenn. However, idealism is just as crucial if not more so--for long-term success in any endeavor, whether it be in academics, business, or political and social reform.
When it comes to academics, students who we would consider pragmatic tend not to pursue an education for its own sake. Instead, they tend to cut whatever corners are needed to optimize their grade average and survive the current academic term. But, is this approach the only way to succeed academically? Certainly not. Students who eamesdy pursue intellectual paths that truly interest them are more likely to come away with a meaningful and lasting education. In fact, a sense of mission about one's area of fascination is strong motivation to participate actively in class and to study earnesdy, both of which contribute to better grades in that area. Thus, although the idealist-student might sacrifice a high overall grade average, the depth of knowledge, academic discipline, and sense of purpose the student gains will serve that student well later in life.
In considering the business world it might be more tempting to agree with the speaker; after all, isn't business fundamentally about pragmatism--that is, "getting the job done" and paying attention to the "bottom line"? Emphatically, no. Admittedly, the everyday machinations of business are very much about meeting mundane short-term goals: deadlines for production, sales quotas, profit margins, and so forth. Yet underpinning these activities is the vision of the company's chief executive--a vision which might extend far beyond mere profit maximization to the ways in which the frrm can make a lasting and meaningful contribution to the community, to the broader economy, and to the society as a whole. Without a dream or vision--that is, without strong idealist leadership--a firm can easily be cast about in the sea of commerce without dear direction, threatening not only the fLrm's bottom line but also its very survival.
Finally, when it comes to the political arena, again at fzrst blush it might appear that pragmatism is the best, if not the only, way to succeed. Most politicians seem driven by their interest in being elected and reelected--that is, in surviving--rather than by any sense of mission, or even obligation to their constituency or country. Diplomatic and legal maneuverings and negotiations often appear intended to meet the practical needs of the parties involved--minimizing costs, preserving options, and so forth. But, it is idealists-not pragmatists--who sway the masses, incite revolutions, and make political ideology reality. Consider idealists such as America's founders, Mahatma Gandhi, or Martin Luther IGng. Had these idealists concerned themselves with short-term survival and immediate needs rather than with their notions of an ideal society, the United States and India might still be British colonies, and African-Americans might still be relegated to the backs of buses.
In short, the statement fails to recognize that idealism--keeping one's eye on an ultimate prize--is the surest path to long-term success in any endeavor. Meeting one's immediate needs, while arguably necessary for short-term survival, accomplishes litde without a sense of mission, a vision, or a dream for the long term.
欢迎您的下载，资料仅供参考！
gre写作超经典范文鉴赏! 想要知道gre写作考试满分作文是肿么写出来的，就非常有必要参考、分析相关范文。出于这样的考虑，在接下来的文章中，天道小编将与您分享一份堪称经典的gre写作范文，相信备战新 gre写作的朋友一定会需要! 以下就是小编准备的gre写作范文啦，备战gre写作的考生们不知道你们准备好了么?提前预祝大家能够在新gre写作考试中取得佳绩! A nationshould require all its students to study the same national curriculum until theyenter college ratherthan allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses tooffer. The speaker would prefer a nationalcurriculum for all children up until college instead of allowing schools in different regionsthe freedom to decide on their own curricula. I agree insofar as some common core curriculumwould serve useful purposes for any nation. At the same time, however, individual statesand communities should have some freedom to augment any such curriculum as theysee fit; otherwise, a nation's educational system might defeat its own purposes in the long term. A national core curriculum would bebeneficial to a nation in a number of respects. First of all,by providing all children withfundamental skills and knowledge, a common core curriculum would help ensure that our childrengrow up to become reasonably informed, productive members of society. In addition, acommon core curriculum would provide a predictable foundation upon which collegeadministrators and faculty could more easily build curricula and select course materials for freshmenthat are neither below nor above their level of educational experience. Finally, a core curriculumwould ensure that all school-children are taught core values upon which any democraticsociety depends to thrive, and even survive--values such as tolerance of others with differentviewpoints, and respect for others. However, a common curriculum that isalso an exclusive one would pose certain problems,which might outweigh the benefits,noted above. First of all, on what basis would certain course work be included or excluded,and who would be the final decision- maker? In all likelihood these decisions would be inthe hands of federal legislators and regulators, who are likely to have their own quirkynotions of what should and should not be taught to children--notions that may or may notreflect those of most communities, schools, or parents. Besides, government officials arenotoriously susceptible to influence-peddling by lobbyists who do not have the best interests ofsociety's children in mind.
GRE试题:GRE北美试题4 GRE试题:GRE北美试题4GRE试题:GRE北美试题4 1. because its average annual rainfall is only about four inches, one of the major tasks faced by the country has been to find ----sources of water. (a) discontinuous (b) natural (c) supplementary (d) pervasive (e) initial 2. both television commercials and programs present ---- view of the material world, one which promotes a standard of living that most of us can probably not attain. (a) an unrealistic (b) an imprudent (c) a standardized (d) a perplexing (e) a banal 3. although it is unusual to denounce museum- goers for not painting, it is quite common, even for those. who are
unenthusiastic about sports, to criticize---- for athletic----. (a) artists.. ignorance (b) spectators.. inactivity (c) athletes.. snobbery (d) scholars.. apathy (e) commentators.. partiality 4. because the order in which the parts of speech appear in the sentences of a given language is decided merely by custom, it is---- to maintain that every departure from that order constitutes a ----of a natural law. (a) traditional.. transformation (b) conventional.. transgression (c) necessary.. prototype (d) unjustifiable.. violation (e) unreasonable.. formulation 5. most people are shameless ---- where the very rich are concerned, ---- curious about how they get their money and how they spend it. (a) prigs.. secretly (b) critics.. endlessly (c) voyeurs.. insatiably (d) exhibitionists.. blatantly
GRE写作分数计算细则 拿到GRE分数后，大家都陆陆续续开始了申请的流程，但是不同的学校对新GRE成绩的要求不尽相同，那么新GRE多少分算高分呢?下面我为大家搜集整理的GRE写作分数计算细则，希望大家喜欢！ GRE写作分数计算细则 新GRE作文在新GRE考试中是比较有难度的，考官对新GRE写作的要求比较高，考查范围也比较广，考生在这些方面要多做准备。那么新GRE 作文部分是如何算分的呢?智课我在此为大家整理出新GRE作文的算法，考生可以参考一下。 新GRE写作要求考生在30分钟+30分钟内分别完成两篇文章，它是美国所有作文考试中时间最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试。新GRE写作的记分方式是这样的，两篇作文总分都是六分，计算公式为你的得分= (Issue的得分+ Argument的得分)2,最终的计分是以0. 5分为一个格。 GRE考试逻辑写作包括两个不同的部分： 1.Issue task(30min),要求作者根据所给题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。 2.Argument task (30min),要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且有力的驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误。 新GRE作文两个部分是如何算分的？ 首先新GRE写作两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的。新GRE作文中有两个项目，最后出的新GRE作文分数是一个，所以如何进行新GRE作文
算分呢？ 由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。 但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分（或高分）o因为如果AA 部分满分的话，AI部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5 分以上。 ETS的评分标准以及作文分数的计算 参照ETS评过分的范文，我们不难发现:无论是ISSUE还是ARGUMENT 在评分标准上都有共同之处，即： 第一，观点要有深度，论证要有说服力； 第二，组织要有条理，表达清晰准确； 第三，语言流利，句式复杂，词汇丰富。 这三条分别说的是行文的〃思想性〃、〃结构性〃和〃表达性〃，众多GRE 考试高分作文的考生大凡都在这三个方面做得很好，我们理所当然也要从这里入手，采取〃各个击破〃的方法解剖新GRE作文的本质，从而得到一个理想分数。新GRE写作的记分方式是这样的，两篇作文总分都是六分，计算公式为你的得分=（Issue的得分^Argument的得分）/2,最终的计分是以0. 5分为一个格。 对于新GRE作文的分数算法我认为，考生只要了解分数算法即可, 没必 要过于纠结其中。GRE考试看重的还是对实力的检验。考生在新GRE 写
新GRE写作Argument范文 来源：互联网 新对于国内考生比较难的一个问题就是中国人的思维与西方人不同，所以的方式也不太一样。因此，大家可以通过参考一些优秀的新GRE的范文来提高自己的写作水平。 Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products. "Previous experience has shown that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build our next new store in Painesville, which has many such residents. Painesville merchants report that sales of running shoes and exercise clothing are at all-time highs. The local health club, which nearly closed five years ago due to lack of business, has more members than ever, and the weight training and aerobics classes are always full. We can even anticipate a new generation of customers: Painesville's schoolchildren are required to participate in a 'fitness for life' program, which emphasizes the benefits of regular exercise at an early age." following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deer haven Acres to all homeowners in Deer haven Acres.
GRE作文5.5分轻松备考：ISSUE习作范文（10） IC： ISSUE36 - "The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries." WORDS： 430(644) TIME： 0：43：00 DATE： 2007-8-10 People usually try to decide the greatness of individuals, who lived before them and in the same time with them. When it comes to the decision of the greatness of individuals, there are always a host of different opinions held by different people in different fields. Should the greatness of individuals be decided by those who live after them or by their contemporaries? Admittedly, mostly their contemporaries may not be able to decide it for some social influence. However, even those who live after them may also make mistakes when deciding their greatness. To begin with, people live in the same time period with individuals whose greatness they want to decide, usually have a biased attitude toward those individuals, not only because of the media, but also due to those people's ability to understand them. Common people always tend to be influenced by others' points of view as well as some social phenomenon. And many great individuals in history had such high competence and genuine capability that they surpassed the society of their time. UFor example, Monet, one of the greatest novelists in history, wrote a large number of novels during his life, but
Argument 12 12、Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors. In this memo Omega University's dean points out that Omega graduates are less successful in getting jobs than Alpha University graduates, despite the fact that during the past 15 years the overall grade average of Omega students has risen by 30%. The dean also points out that during the past 15 years Omega has encouraged its students, by way of a particular procedure, to evaluate the effectiveness of their professors. The dean reasons that this procedure explains the grade-average increase, which in turn has created a perception among employers that Omega graduates are less qualified for jobs. On the basis of this line of reasoning the dean concludes that to enable Omega graduates to find better jobs Omega must terminate its professor-evaluation procedure. This argument contains several logical flaws, which render it unconvincing. A threshold problem with the argument involves the voluntary nature of the evaluation procedure. The dean provides no evidence about the or percentage of Omega students who participate in the procedure. Lacking such evidence it is entirely possible that those numbers are insignificant, in which case terminating the procedure is unlikely to have any effect on the grade average of Omega students or their success in getting jobs after graduation. The argument also assumes unfairly that the grade-average increase is the result of the evaluation procedure--rather than some other phenomenon. The dean ignores a host of other possible explanations for the increase--such as a trend at Omega toward higher or higher quality instruction or facilities. Without ruling out all other possible explanations for the grade-average increase, the dean cannot convince me that by terminating the evaluation procedure Omega would curb its perceived grade inflation let alone help its graduates get jobs. Even if the evaluation procedure has resulted in grade inflation at Omega, the dean's claim that grade inflation explains why Omega graduates are less successful than Alpha graduates in getting jobs is unjustified. The dean overlooks a myriad of other possible reasons for Omega's comparatively poor job-placement record. Perhaps Omega's career services are inadequate; or perhaps Omega's curriculum does not prepare students for the job market as effectively as Alpha's. In short, without accounting for other factors that might contribute to Omega graduates' comparative lack of success in getting jobs, the dean cannot justify the claim that if Omega curbs its grade inflation employers will be more likely to hire Omega graduates. 这段话的内容太重复了这个描述不够清晰 直接说有调查错误 就好了 the survey cited by the author is not reliable. 这篇文章的数据有很多问题，比如30%和average 这个因果关系的 梳理很好这两个原因列举 的很好 划线部分是 让步攻击部分， 即使上面这个逻辑 错误不存在，那么 后面这个也有问题
如何使用gre写作范文2020 当你准备gre写作部分时，你可能会收集一些样本范文。下面就和大家分享如何使用gre写作范文，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。 如何使用gre写作范文 gre考试作文范文虽然需要背诵，但是要选择经典的来背诵，而不是盲目的背诵，追求数量。有一些非常好的例子能够灵活运用是很好的，但是，gre写作重点考察的并不是例子语句的运用，还是对于*题目的论述及说明，所以围绕主题，选取有用的例句才是最重要的。 对于写作，不一定是你例子背得多、反复地用例子来举证论点就能写出一篇好*，最好还是要找一本国外的写作教材来进行参考，弄清楚国外写作的具体要求，像《经济学人》、《时代周刊》这上面的评述类的*都可以拿来进行借鉴，多进行模仿和学习。 在这里像各位同学推荐一本国外教材，叫《分析性写作》，这本书在书店都是可以买到的，大家可以从里面学习如何论证自己的分论点，这些都写得比较详细。
中国学生写作时喜欢写一些大词和长句，觉得句子长了*也就会写得好，但GRE写作却不是这么回事，有可能你自以为自己写的很好，但是逻辑性是不严密的，可能外国人就会觉得很啰嗦，没有什么实质性的内容，结果就会导致分数比较低。 天道gre备考攻略提示，gre写作关键是要反复多练，要仔细地反复地研究备考指导上面的范文，因为只有备考指导上面的*是经过认证的，所以一定要把这些范文研究得分成透彻，达到滚瓜烂熟的程度，掌握它每一个评分标准的要求，研究好为什么会给这篇范文6分而给另一篇3分;另外，学生在做GRE阅读时可以通过模仿这些阅读*来提高自己的写作水平。 gre写作例句虽然需要背诵，但是要选择经典的例句来背诵，而不是盲目的背诵，追求数量。其实例句背诵还有一个最重要的用途便是通过背诵来熟悉英文的叙述方式，通过一些经典语句的背诵，使很多经典语法能够流畅的运用在gre写作当中。 GRE作文范文：知识的影响 The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes. GRE作文范文参考：
36 Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. I agree with the speaker's broad assertion that money spent on research is generally money well invested. However, the speaker unnecessarily extends this broad assertion to embrace research whose results are "controversial," while ignoring certain compelling reasons why some types of research might be unjustifiable. My points of contention with the speaker involves the fundamental objectives and nature of research, as discussed below. I concede that the speaker is on the correct philosophical side of this issue. After all, research is the exploration of the unknown for true answers to our questions, and for lasting solutions to our enduring problems. Research is also the chief means by which we humans attempt to satisfy our insatiable appetite for knowledge, and our craving to understand ourselves and the world around us. Yet, in the very notion of research also lies my first point of contention with the speaker, who illogically presumes that we can know the results of research before we invest in it. To the contrary, if research is to be of any value it must explore uncharted and unpredictable territory. In fact, query whether research whose benefits are immediate and predictable can break any new ground, or whether it can be considered "research" at all. While we must invest in research irrespective of whether the results might be controversial, at the same time we should be circumspect about research whose objectives are too vague and whose potential benefits are too speculative. After all, expensive research always carries significant opportunity costs--in terms of how the money might be spent toward addressing society's more immediate problems that do not require research. One apt illustration of this point involves the so-called "Star Wars" defense initiative, championed by the Reagan administration during the 1980s. In retrospect, this initiative was ill-conceived and largely a waste of taxpayer dollars; and few would dispute that the exorbitant amount of money devoted to the initiative could have gone a long way toward addressing pressing social problems of the day--by establishing after-school programs for delinquent latchkey kids, by enhancing AIDS awareness and education, and so forth. As it turns out, at the end of the Star Wars debacle we were left with rampant gang violence, an AIDS epidemic, and an unprecedented federal budget deficit. The speaker's assertion is troubling in two other aspects as well. First, no amount of research can completely solve the enduring problem of war, poverty, and violence, for the reason that they stem from certain aspects of human nature--such as aggression and greed. Although human genome research might eventually enable us to engineer away those undesirable aspects of our nature, in the meantime it is up to our economists, diplomats, social reformers, and jurists--not our research laboratories--to mitigate these problems. Secondly, for every new research breakthrough that helps reduce human suffering is another that serves primarily to add to that suffering. For example, while some might argue that physics researchers who harnessed the power of the atom have provided us with an alternative source of energy and invaluable "peace-keepers," this argument flies in the face of the hundreds of thousands of innocent people murdered and maimed by atomic blasts, and by nuclear meltdowns. And, in fulfilling the promise of "better living through chemistry" research has given us chemical weapons for human slaughter. In short, so-called "advances" that scientific research has brought about often amount to net losses for humanity. In sum, the speaker's assertion that we should invest in research whose results are 整体评价： 1. 文章整理的论述比较通畅 2. 但是这篇文章的结构存在一些瑕疵，如开头段过长，涵盖了过多的细节，容易和后面的内容雷同 money well invested 用的 很好，很地道这里的论述有些过于细 致，可以放到让步段去详细解释 ing 用词很地道 这段话的精髓就是后面 例子的列举，有效地 证明了盲目投入的 恶果这段话是想说明不要不急后果的投入，中心句可以说的更直白 一点 Ignoring reasonable speculation of research will impede social progress, even bringing more social issues. 这个as well 用的不好，前后内容不是并列的 这段内容说的有些笼统 虽然两个点都有所 涉及，但是没有说 明白第一，这个可以说实验 的结论不完全取决于实验本身 第二，这个可以说下定义，解释说明实验的影 响对不同的人群有不同的影响not 这里少了一个重要的否定词 大家要注意，我们对题目内容的改写一定要准确
2019年GRE考试写作经典范文赏析（二） The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time." The speaker contends that technology's primary goal should be to increase our efficiency for the purpose of affording us more leisure time. I concede that technology has enhanced our efficiency as we go about our everyday lives. Productivity software helps us plan and coordinate projects; intranets, the Internet, and satellite technology make us more efficient messengers; and technology even helps us prepare our food and access entertainment more efficiently. Beyond this concession, however, I find the speaker's contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint. 注意这种新结构：使用了大量的事实作出对原文观点的让步性同意，但是在最后还是有所创新的提出自己的读到见解。这种开头给人一种很爽的感觉——have forcibly posed your viewpoints.让我们记住：The speaker contends that……I concede that……Beyond this concession, however, I find the speaker's contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint. The chief reason for my disaGREement lies in the empirical proof： with technological advancement comes diminished leisure time. In 1960 the average U.S. family included only one breadwinner, who worked just over 40 hours per week. Since then the average work week has increased
智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料
北美满分GRE作文范文精选 复习GRE作文，一定要看美国满分GRE作文范文，为了就是掌握最正宗的英语表述方法，习惯美国人的逻辑思维。研究这些范文，也同时提醒自己，不能出现任何奇怪的表达。想要将GRE作文写好，就要从根本出发，从彻底的思维逻辑方面追却与英文“原产地”的一致性。 The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper: "Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money." Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. GRE首段 This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the