6.12.17雅思真题大作文7分范文

雅思真题作文2017年雅思真题作文当今世界有许多不同类型的音乐。

为什么我们需要音乐?一个国家的传统音乐和现在随处听到的国际音乐谁更重要?你有答案?下面是店铺整理的雅思英语作文，大家可以参考参考。

雅思作文范文【1】题目：There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?范文：It is true that a rich variety of musical styles can be found around the world. Music is a vital part of all human cultures for a range of reasons, and I would argue that traditional music is more important than modern, international music.Music is something that accompanies all of us throughout our lives. As children, we are taught songs by our parents and teachers as a means of learning language, or simply as a form of enjoyment. Children delight in singing with others, and it would appear that the act of singing in a group creates a connection between participants, regardless of their age. Later in life, people’s musical pr eferences develop, and we come to see our favourite songs as part of our life stories. Music both expresses and arouses emotions in a way that words alone cannot. In short, it is difficult to imagine life without it.In my opinion, traditional music should be valued over the international music that has become so popular. International pop music is often catchy and fun, but it is essentially a commercial product that is marketed and sold by businesspeople. Traditional music, by contrast, expresses the culture, customs and history of a country. Traditional styles, such as ...(example)..., connect us to the past and form part of our cultural identity. It would be a real pity if pop music became so predominant that these national styles disappeared.In conclusion, music is a necessary part of human existence, and I believe that traditional music should be given more importance than international music.(261 words, band 9)雅思作文范文【2】题目：Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits?范文：Many people, and children in particular, enjoy playing computer games. While I accept that these games can sometimes have a positive effect on the user, I believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact.On the one hand, video games can be both entertaining and educational. Users, or gamers, are transported into virtual worlds which are often more exciting and engaging than real-life pastimes. From an educational perspective, these games encourage imagination and creativity, as well as concentration, logical thinking and problem solving, all of which are useful skills outside the gaming context. Furthermore, it has been shown that computer simulation games can improve users’ motor skills and help to prepare them for real-world tasks, such as flying a plane.However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighedby the drawbacks. Gaming can be highly addictive because users are constantly given scores, new targets and frequent rewards to keep them playing. Many children now spend hours each day trying to progress through the levels of a game or to get a higher score than their friends. This type of addiction can have effects ranging from lack of sleep to problems at school, when homework is sacrificed for a few more hours on the computer or console. The rise in obesity in recent years has also been linked in part to the sedentary lifestyle and lack of exercise that often accompany gaming addiction.In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more significant than the possible benefits.(258 words, band 9)【2017年雅思真题作文】。

In counties, where there is a high rate of unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the importance of education in modern society. The issue of high rate of unemployment has been a controversial and much disputed subject. I believe that there is a definite link between higher education and rate of unemployment.Firstly, secondary education is of overriding importance for moral education to pupils who have immature mind. If they choose to give up entering higher level of education, or if secondary education was interrupted, they are highly likely to go astray, and misguided by experienced lawless people, which leads to numerous ominous results and social problems, even social turbulence. Furthermore, the rate of juvenile delinquency has grown, to great extent, due to reason that they are lack of strict, regular, and principal stage of secondary education, in which are able to provide the pupils with educations of higher quality, because there have students in the learning atmosphere can be deeply developed themselves’potential, and interests, obviously, this is positive cycle.In a long run, if the pupils can receive better education, they may have far more opportunities to find a better job, in addition to, education can do a favor to enhance personal fundamental quality, which can boost the quality of labor force, and thereby, promote production efficiency and social development, lastly, the issue of higher rate of unemployment can be root and branch reformed, mitigated, and advanced.All in all, the function of education is not limited in job hunting, which can continue to people’s better development, otherwise the motivation and goal of all round development will be curbed.Unlike other countries, police in UK do not carry guns. Some think it leaves citizen unprotected, while others think it reduces the overall violence in our society. Discuss both of views and give your own opinions.It is increasingly difficult to ignore the social issue that whether police should carry guns or not in UK, due to the reason that the voice of rebel has grown in recent conflicts with violence between police and citizens. Some believe that police with no guns in UK will leaves citizens in danger, others claim that it dwindle the whole violence in our lives. People’s options towards varied, I will attempt to remedy this problem.Traditionally, ordinary police in UK do not carry guns due to the reason that the weapon exist potential danger and citizens hard to accept the aggressive images when police carry guns. Although more than half police confronted at least one time life-threatened condition during the process of implementing task (mission), simultaneously, over 40% police suffer violent attack during the process of arresting criminal suspects, however, over 77% police refuse to carry guns, people fear that police carrying guns maybe kill some innocent people, so, police have once stuck in between the maintaining the social stability and concerning about public images.Furthermore, had on conflict involving guns can only lead to more bloodshed, which are highly likely to bring about social turbulence and citizen protest, it not only beget more violence, numerous innocent people involved will directly damage government reputation, but also citizens no longer trust and advocate police’s daily working, so the social order will not be guaranteed, obviously, this is a vicious cycle.On the other hand, it is not a single measure to deter crimes when police carrying guns walk on the streets. I believe that the most effective and appropriate way to hinder the criminal rate is enhancing the educational degree and amend more feasible and efficient punishment law. As both of them integrated, increasing of people will beconsciously aware of the importance of abiding by discipline and rules.The function and aim of carrying guns is to act as deterrent to would-be criminals and criminal suspects. However, sometimes, this value have already been diminished, for those potential criminals are usually heavily armed, and they have probably grasp the capacity of counter-reconnaissance。

雅思7分作文1．The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive. What are your opinions on this?The Internet has brought significant changes to our lives in recent years. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this technology has been positive or negative. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that the benefits of the Internet far outweigh its drawbacks. These benefits are twofold.First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the Internet has revolutionized the way we communicate. Despite the risk of social isolation—a problem occasionally seen in people who spend too much time at their computer terminal rather than relating to people in the real world--- most of us have benefited greatly from e-mail and internet chat programs like MSN Messenger. These incredibly useful and powerful tools of communication facilitate both contact with loved ones in faraway places and global trade.Equally importantly, though, the Internet has placed the entire world (and all of the information in it) at our fingertips. In earlier times, conducting research entailed long hours searching library shelves. Now, however, the same information can be accessed at the click of a button. Admittedly, not all of the information available on the Internet is reliable or helpful---there is a vast amount of material online that some would consider offensive or dangerous, ranging from pornography to instructions on how to make bombs. Nonetheless, I would contend that this free flow of information has generally been a very positive development.By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that the Internet has had a positive impact on modern life because of its influence on communication and the flow of information.2．Fast food is now universally available in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this?The past 50 years have seen a dramatic increase in the availability of fast food. Some laud its convenience and relatively low cost; however, in this essay I intend to argue that this kind of food is detrimental both to the individuals that consume it and to society at large. There are two primary reasons for this.First of that, it is an undeniable fact that consuming fast food to excess results in serious health problems. Foods such as fried chicken, hamburgers and chips---which are incredibly high in fat and salt---are responsible for such ailments as high blood pressure, obesity and heart disease. Moreover, although I certainly agree that fast food is both affordable and convenient, the cost and inconvenience of treating the illnesses it causes in later life are significant. In order words, while fast food is beneficial in the short term, its long-term effects are generally negative.Further and even more importantly, though, some fast food chains deliberately attempt to attract children in order to shape their future eating habits. One particularly good example of this is the character Ronald McDonald---the bright clothes and smile of the McDonald clown are a beacon to children. Having grown up eating in McDonald restaurants, people are likely to continue eating there throughout their adult lives. It is also interesting to note that McDonald provides playgrounds and frequently holds children’s birthday parties in order to attract young children and their parents.By way of conclusion, I believe that fast food will continue to become more popular as the pace of life increases. Given the health risks associated with this trend, I believe that public education campaigns warning people about the dangers of fast food would be warranted.3．International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a position trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this?The past 50 years have seen a considerable increase in global tourism. Despite the undeniable economic prosperity it has brought to many host countries, I would argue that the overall impact of international holidaymaking has in fact been negative. Two of the primary drawbacks associated with this trend are as follows.First of all, global tourism tends to export many negative aspects of western culture. Since it is only the wealthy who can afford to travel abroad, developing countries like Thailand and Indonesia have become the playgrounds of tourists from more affluent ones. In many such nations, this influx of mainly western tourists has brought with it problems such as prostitution as well as alcoholism and drug abuse. Admittedly, international tourism does have the potential to foster greater understanding and tolerance between people of different cultures. However, this is unlikely to occur while it remains such a potent symbol of western cultural domination and moral decadence.Even more disturbing, though, is the environmental degradation that international tourism has caused in many parts of the world. One particularly salient example of this is the Great Barrier Reef in Australia --- the countless boats, divers and snorkelers that have visited the reef over the past few decades have gradually destroyed vast sections of coral. Similarly, world renowned Kuta Beach in Bali has become heavily polluted in recent years. In order to be sustainable, greater regulation of global tourism is required.In conclusion, the challenges presented by the booming international tourist industry are numerous and complex. Although they are by no means insurmountable, it is highly unlikely that they will be resolved in the foreseeable future.4. Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order to become integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon their old ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior. Do you agree or disagree?These days, it seems that more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. This raises certain questions about the integration of newcomers into society. Although there are valid arguments to the contrary, in this paper I will argue that it is the responsibility of immigrants to adapt to accepted rules of behavior in their adopted country, both written and unwritten. The reasons for this are twofold.Firstly, it is vitally important that newcomers observe the laws of their adopted country for the sake of social order. Imagine the chaos that would ensure if people refused to drive on the same side of the road. It is, therefore, necessary for all immigrants to ensure that they observe the law in their new country regardless of any differences to laws in their home country. Two further instances of practices which are permitted in some countries but prohibited in orders are the possession of firearms and gambling.Secondly and more importantly, though, in order to maintain societal cohesion it is essential that newcomers respect the social norms of their adopted country. Of course, having a mixture of different cultures and traditions gives a country colour and vibrancy; however, I would contend that too much cultural diversity undermines a society by alienating people from each other. It is my belief that similarities unite people, whereas differences have a tendency to divide. A strong society is a homogenous society with shared values and goals.By way of conclusion, I believe that this issue is likely to become even more important in the future as borders between countries become increasingly blurred. It, therefore, demands our further consideration.5. Men and women are difficult in terms of their characteristics and abilities. For this reason, some jobs are better done by men and others by women. Do you agree or disagree?These days, it seems that more women are entering “male occupations” than ever before and vice versa. While some still hold to the conservative view that certain jobs are better performed by men and others by women, it is my personal belief that people of either sex are capable of doing any job effectively. The reasons for my position are as follows.First of all, I believe it is a mistake to base our views on broad generalizations about the characteristics of men and women as such stereotypes are often inaccurate. Although there are certainly traits which are typical of men and others which are typical of women, there are exceptions to every rule. Not all women are physically weak, just as not all men are poor interpersonal communicators; conventional gender roles are not appropriate for everybody. If a man or woman desires to pursue a career which is traditionally reserved for the opposite sex, I believe he/she should be provided the opportunity to prove him/herself capable.Secondly, I would contend that the presence of both males and females in a workplace brings a sense of balance. Men and women frequently, though by no means always, have different methods of doing things. Rather than judging these differences to be weaknesses, I feel that we should view them as opportunities for innovation and the discovery of more effective and efficient work practices. A person’s weaknesses can thus be transformed into strengths.In summary, I once again reaffirm my position that both male and female employees are an asset to any industry and as our stereotypes about men and women are not always appropriate, we must not discourage anyone from choosing an occupation simply because of his/her gender.6. Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. Do you agree or disagree?There are widely differing views on the issue of whether tobacco should be banned or not. Some people would suggest that it is their right to smoke and that prohibiting cigarettes would be a violation of their civil liberties; however, I personally believe that tobacco should indeed be made illegal. There are two principal reasons for this.One point which I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that tobacco is a drug. The majority of governments around the world take a prohibitionist approach to the problem of substance abu se. If governments wish to be consistent in pursuing their “war on drugs”, therefore, I believe they must ban tobacco as well. This is particularly heroin and marijuana---have legitimate medical applications, while tobacco has none.However, perhaps the strongest argument in favor of banning cigarettes and other tobacco products is that of public health. It is an irrefutable fact that smoking leads to lung cancer and other such potentially fatal diseases. Pro-smoking groups would no doubt argue that each individual has the right to determine what goes into his/her own body. Nevertheless, I would suggest that the interests and rights of society at large must override those of the individual. The medical treatment that smokers require is often incredibly costly, and it is frequently governments and society that cover these costs rather than the individual smoker. Hence, I feel that laws prohibiting smoking would be entirely justified.In reality, of course, the widespread prohibition of smoking is unlikely in the near future. However, given the seriousness of the problems that it causes, I believe that this should be the ultimate goal.7. Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources. Do you agree or disagree?The issue of whether we should attempt to save endangered species from extinction or not is certainly a contentious one. Despite the arguments of some people that such animals serve no useful purpose and should be allowed to die out just as many others (including the dinosaurs) have in the past, it is my personal belief that they should in fact be preserved. Two of the principal reasons for this are as follows.Firstly, it is vital that we appreciate the importance of endangered species in maintaining the balance of nature. Ecosystems are delicate arrangements where plants and animals all depend on each other for survival. The disappearance or introduction of any animal species disrupts the balance and negatively impacts upon other plants and animals by breaking the food chain and altering the habitat in which they live. Such imbalances frequently return to haunt us in unexpected ways. Just as rabbits that were introduced to Australia soon after European settlement now compete with native species for food and destroy farmers’ crops, the extinction of a predator can cause plagues by allowing its prey to multiply unchecked. Therefore, since ecological change constitutes a potential risk to us and our environment, it is clearly I our own interests to protect endangered species.Yet, perhaps the strongest argument in favor of preserving endangered species is that all life has intrinsic value; even if endangered species are not useful to us in any practical way they should be preserved nevertheless. Further, given that we humans are responsible for destroying the natural habitat of many endangered animals, we should make every possible effort to save them.In conclusion, I once again restate my view that saving endangered species is worthwhile. Not only do they help to maintain the balance of nature, but they also have value in and of themselves.8. With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted that families today are not as close as they used to be. Discuss the causes of this problem and offer some possible solutions to it.Divorce and family breakdown were virtually unheard of just 100 years ago. Now, however, almost half of all marriages fail. This phenomenon is symptomatic of the growing distance between family members in modern society. In this essay, I intend to explore the sources of this problem along with some possible solutions to it.Chief among the causes of this problem is the modern lifestyle. Today’s parents have to work harder than those of previous generations to support their families. Traditionally, one parent assumed the role of breadwinner, while the other---typically the mother----acted as the homemaker. Recently, though, double income families have become the norm. Consequently, an increasing number of children now grow up in a parentless environment. Little wonder, then, that they feel alienated. Another contributing factor is the passive and solitary nature of many modern forms of entertainment.In order to resolve this sense of alienation within families, I believe we must first address its root causes. Perhaps the most effective method of doing this would be for governments to offer financial incentives to parents who choose to remain at home and take care of their families. Admittedly, such incentives would probably not full compensate couples for lost income; however, they would at least soften the hardship of living on a single income and provide an alternative for parents who would rather remain at home but are unable to do so because of financial constraints. One further measure would be to promote more interactive leisure activities in the community through public education campaigns.In conclusion, I believe that this is clearly a problem of such complexity that to no solution is likely in the short term. However, I believe that the measures outlined above would constitute a good first step.。

我的托福雅思必过雅思大作文7高分范文-教育类环球教研团队今天给大家带来了雅思大作文7+高分范文-教育类的内容，感兴趣的同学赶紧过来看看。

题目Some people think language should be taught in a small class, but others believe that the number of students does not matter. Discuss both and present your opinion范文In which way should we teach language - in a small class which restricts the number of students or a large class where the number does not matter? Personally, it should be content-based, all about making the contents into priority.When it comes to classroom teaching, classroom management has always been brought up. Then in a small class, it will be more flexible and feasible for teachers to observe each student’s performance and give personal feedback. For instance, the teacher will be able to have interactions with students, be it in grammar teaching or clarifying pronunciation, which helps identify problems of each one and make re-demonstrations. Then, the teacher can personalize the solutions.Quite apart from this, many others would argue that the number actually does not affect the learning process. Further, they stress that language, more than knowledge, is preciously the ability, with which one is able to integrate into the target community. Then, it is always about how to use in a real life situation where the number of people can be barely calculated. Besides, language expressions are diverse and the meaning is directly related to the speaker. Therefore, language learning should not be confined to a small scale.In conclusion, from my own knowledge, language with its own linguistic properties is rather a complicated system, with syntax, phonetics, semantics and pragmatics, and covers four language skills - reading, listening, speaking and writing. Therefore, I believe it is the goal of teaching and contents that actually determine the numbers of students.以上就是雅思写作7+范文的详细内容，想要了解更多雅思写作考试资讯请继续关注雅思频道。

雅思写作7分2014雅思写作7分范文雅思写作7分范文第1篇：国家差异消失的优缺点Nowadays we can enjoy the same films, fashions, brands, advertisements and TV channels. The evident difference between countries is disappearing. To what extent do you think the disadvantages overweight the advantages of this?Globalization creates conditions for widening international exchanges, strengthening mutual understanding between nations, expanding cultural, educational, and scientific cooperation between nations and countries, enjoying the cultural achievements of people around the world which encourages the process of modernization and the enrichment of national culture.However, these conditions also create the possible danger of diminishing the national culture with a negative impact on the pre123vation of national identity. Through globalization and an open door policy, erroneous concepts and a lowering of ethical standards, a selfish and individualistic lifestyle and harmful cultural products can easily be imported into the country. At present, modern information technology which in the main is controlled by US is hourly and intensively disseminating US ideology, way of life, culture and films across the world. Even US food is promoted so that some people consider globalization as global Americanization.During the process of economic globalization, inequality between developed and developing countries has been increasing and the gap between the rich and the poor has become wider, most of the result of globalization go to assist developed countries. Globalization does not pose equal interestsand risks to all nations. With an overwhelming advantage compared to most of the developing countries in terms of finance and the level of science and technology, developed ca123alist countries control the situation of economic globalization.For these reasons, globalization is a fierce and complicated struggle in both cultural and ideological fields. We take the initiative in international economic integration but also have to take the initiative in fighting to keep our distinct culture resisting pro-foreign and cross-bred phenomena, and overcoming the psychology of preferring money over ethical values.雅思写作7分范文第2篇：说谎有没有必要Telling lie is usually looked upon as an evil, because some people try to get benefit from dishonest means or try to conceal their faults. On the other hand,honesty is widely recognized as the best policy.Parents always try to prove the benefits of being honest when you are a little child. A good story in this regard is .One day the child Washington chop down his farther’ s favorite cherry tree; although knowing he would deserve to be punished, he told his father the truth. Unexpected, his farther apprised him rather than executing a punishment; moreover, he was encouraged to maintain the good manner all the time. As known to all, the honest boy eventually became one of the greatest presidents in American history.However, telling lie,despite its negative effects, sometimes is essential in our daily life. First, the liar itself will benefit from the lie by escaping from the pressure of unnecessary embarrassment. On the other hand, the listener will feel more comfortable by reasonable excuses. For example, if a little girl’s farther died inan accident, her mother would comfort her by saying" farther has gone to another beautiful land". In such cases, a lie with original goodwill is like a naught angel who might make the cruel nice. Furthermore, To some extent, the skills of telling lie can be regard as a capacity of creation and imagination.Taking all those factors into consideration, we can definitely come to the conclusion that whether telling lie is harmful depends on its original intention and the ultimate result it will bring. If one is honest with oneself, one always learns from mistakes, can correct a concept or a hypothesis and work further, and reach the goal finally.雅思写作7分范文第3篇：环境问题In a world today of immense technology, increasing population and flourishing economic , investigations have shown that the global economy was outgrowing the earth’s ecosystems. The whole industrial process which makes many of the goods and machines we need and use in daily lives, is bound to create a number of waste products which upset the environmental balance.As mass production is the core principle of industrial economy, mass consumption and mass abandonment become the core principle in industrial age. Many of these waste products can be prevented or disposed of sensibly, but clearly while more and more new goods are produced and made more complex, there will be new wastes to be disposed of. The rise of wastes has led to an unparalleled debate between environmental protection and economic development.However, they often ignore that the real victim of pollutions is not the citizen, because the rubbishes usually be gathered together and moved to an area far from the cities. As a result, inthese areas the usable fields will be destructed, the air will be polluted, wild life, including both plants and animals will be put at risk, moreover, many inhabitants will be weaken on account of the waste despoil with poisonous materials from industrial companies.下载文档。

ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ,ÿÿÿÿÿQÿÿ154366788好的东西，和大家分享，看这个帖子的人肯定比较多，大家别冒险背诵，了解一下范文的思路好了。

这样好的东西，可惜不是我整理的，是一个叫landfish姑娘收集的，厉害！v105some people claim that the disadvantages of the car are more than the advantages,do you agree or disagree?范文1the birth of cars have made an enormous change to our life.in the past,we travel from one place to another only by foot,nowaday,cars can do it.its goes withour saying that the invention of cars bring great benefit to all of us.but as proverb goes:no garden without weeds.car is not exception.owing a car has a lot of advantages.for one thing,car provide us the most convient way of transportation.we can get around freely without spenting a lot of time.emotionally,i always found driving is so exciting.for another,its the comfortable to drive a car.In winter.drivers always can stay warm and dry even in rainy whether,in addition,drivers are usually safe in their cars when they are out at night.Cars bring the human merits,their side-effects graudually come to the surface.firstly,to run a car need a lot of oil,which is getting less and less.the increasing number of cars contribute the lacking of energy.secondlly,as more and more cars are used,the traffic ecpecially in big cities is getting heaver and heavier,which lead to the serious social problem--traffic jam.in addition,the inceasing numbers of cars,which excaust sent a huge quantities of carbon monoxide into atmosphere.it make the air of cities unbreathabe,it strip people contact with frensh air.therefore,the new energy should be explored to replace the oil so that our envionmental pollution can be avioded.and the strick law should be issued to keep the numbers of cars under control.thus,our heavier traffic can be solluted!范文2Private cars vs Public trafficAs traffic problems become more and more serious in many cities of developed and developing countries,their governments have to try hard and loads of money and energy have been spent to deal with them.Firstly,it is not efficient for the commuters to use their private cars to and back from their workplaces.Occasionally we can see they have to sit on the wheels wasting time and fuel in a heavy traffic jam.At the same time,through burning the fossil fuels,green house gas CO2,CO1,acid rain gas SO2,fumes and dusts are being released into the atmosphere,all of which heavily overload the environment.Thirdly,with the increase of private cars,the road traffic accidents are also rise dramatically.For example,in a city with5000cars,there will be at least250accidents happening everyday,which also burden the public healthy services.On the contrary,expected public traffic may be an ideal solution to these problems.For example city buses and railways are widely used or being constructed by many cities.People can take buses easily,which can be found every10minutes or less in the peak time.Actually,Nottingham Transport Company is building its own light railway in the city,which is announced by the speak man of the company,“It will be completed in the next year,the tickets will be very competitive and at the same time the travel will be very safe and comfortable.”On the other hand,public traffic had its own ually it cannot provide door-to-door service.It is inconvenient to go shopping by public vehicles.Sometimes you must wait a long time for the train.And quite a lot of people prefer to enjoy driving.In conclusion,developing the public traffic is a useful approach to deal with these difficulties.One possible way,if not the best,is to taxi private cars heavily and use these revenues to provide citizens cheaper public traffic services.雅思口语外教一对一陪练，免费试听：ｗｗｗ．２ｕｅｄｕ．ｃｎ；淘宝店：２ｕｅｄｕ．ｔａｏｂａｏ．ｃｎ；Ｑ群：１５４３６６７８８范文3With the development of science and technology,the cars have already become the important component in our daily life gradually.Cars make our life convenient and swift.However,too many cars have caused very serious social problems.Some people claim that the disadvantages of car are more than the advantages.I doubt whether the argument can bear much analysis.Since one century[ago],the auto industry has[been]developed at full speed worldwide,and has brought the enormous progresses to our life.For example,the car is the most convenient tool of transportation.We can[be]on and off duty by car every day,we can go to travel by car on the vacation,we can utilize the cars to deal with some emergency too.The car[is]playing an important role in our daily life.They make our rhythm of life faster and faster,make our business become more and more efficient.On the other hand,the development of the automobile has brought a lot of infant industry to people,Give people countless employment opportunities too.Such as,manufacturing industry,repairing industry and maintaining industry.We are enjoying the convenience that the cars bring to us;at the same time we can utilize the auto industry to support ourselves.However,we can not ignore that too many cars cause enormous social problems,for example,traffic jam,air pollution,traffic accident,to which we have to find a solution.In a word,the cars have brought enormous change to our life;the advantages are far more than the disadvantages.We should recognize the merit of the cars,and do our best to solve the problems.If so,our life will be brighter.Version00106范文1Nowhere in the world has the issue of tobacco been so much debated as inour society.Nowadays,tobacco is more harmful than drug to people’shealth,therefore many people think that smoking is legal that is a direct andprimary reason to induce this kind of problem.The above point is certainlytrue;this essay will outline three reasons.The main reason is that tobacco is a silent killer to smokers.Tobacco isknown to be the probable cause of some25different diseases,and for some,such as lung cancer,bronchitis and emphysema,it is the main cause.According to a WHO report four million people die yearly from tobacco-related diseases,that is one death every eight seconds.Tobacco is significantlybecoming a greater cause of death and disability than any other single cause.Another reason is that more and more young people are under18years old who smoke cigarette have been blinded by the deceit of tobacconists.Tobacco among adolescents remains stubbornly persistent.Smoking among adolescents rose in the1990s in several developed countries，such as China,Vietnam and Thailand.While new markets are being opened by the tobacco industry actions,old markets have not been closed.Tobacco is a global threat.Last but not the least reason is the increase in cigarette smuggling.Becauseof tobacco smuggling,the legal retailing and distribution systems are badlyaffected,and faced with increased lawlessness and heavy tax losses.This behavior severely affects the economy.In conclusion,the tobacco should be considered illegal.Perhaps a pack ofcigarettes is less harmful than another drug,but tobacco is actually thebiggest killer of all the drugs.=================================================范文2Advertisements of tobacco and those of“smoking is harmful”are often seentogether.But there has been an on-going argument about whether or not雅思口语外教一对一陪练，免费试听：ｗｗｗ．２ｕｅｄｕ．ｃｎ；淘宝店：２ｕｅｄｕ．ｔａｏｂａｏ．ｃｎ；Ｑ群：１５４３６６７８８tobacco should be forbidden and made illegal.I have always believed thatsmoking should be illegal for the following reasons.First,smoking does great harm to human health and causes many diseases.It is reported that more than70%of lung cancer sufferers are smokers,andthe average life-span of smokers is seven years less than that of non-smokers.Moreover,it hurts not only smokers,but also the ones around thesmokers.Many researchers claim that breathing“second-hand smoke”maybe even more harmful than smoking.Second,many social problems and disasters can be attributed to smoking.For instance,many wives cannot bear their husbands’smoking all the time,which causes many quarrels,or even divorces.Furthermore,the biggest firedisaster in China,the Daxinganling fire disaster,was caused by a burningcigarette end,and the cost of the resulting loss was unimaginable.Last,smoking tobaccos is a main source of air pollution.A magazine said thatfor every cigarette smoked each day,a whole tree is needed to clean the air.In other words,smoking one less cigar every day equals planting a tree.Itis a brilliant contribution to the earth we are living on.In a word,all the above demonstrate that smoking harms yourselves as wellas your neighbors,pollutes the air we ourselves are breathing,and evenagitates the social peace.So,in my opinion,tobacco should be strictlyforbidden,and smoking should be made illegal.范文3there has long been controversy over the legality and apparent acceptance of tobacco in society.some hold that cigarettes and other tobacco containing products should be banned,that is,treated as narcotics.personally,i agree with this point of view for the following reasons:although cigarettes do not offer as intense an effect as drugs like heroin and cocaine,they rank higher in the level of dependence it creates in the user.thousands of smokers try to rid themselves of cigarettes but cannot,because of the physiological dependence they developed,chiefly imputable to its chemical nicotine.this explains why smokers continue their habit despite the numerous health warnings.furthermore,medical science has now proved beyond a doubt that smoking kills.with all the other causes of preventable deaths such as alcohol,illegal drugs,aids,suicide,road accidents,fire,and guns,cigarettes still account for more preventable deaths than all of those combined.more disturbingly,whilst the use of heroin is dangerous solely to the users,the use of tobacco endangers those who are in their vicinity as well.this phenomenon,known as passive smoking,nulls the counter-argument that putting one's own health at risk through smoking should be up to one's own individual choice.reports have shown that the amount of second-hand smoke inhaled by a typical nonsmoker is equivalent to one cigarette smoked per day,and what is more,passive smoking can increase a nonsmoker's chance of getting cancer by ten to thirty two per cent.there are those who will say that the black market created by outlawing tobacco will produce deadlier cigarettes because the product standards of the bootleggers are not as high.however,we should all bear in mind that legal cigarettes cause roughly four hundred thousand deaths a year.it is hard to imagine the limited distribution provided by the criminal underworld could compete with this tragic figure.to sum up,the harm visited upon our society by tobacco usage is substantial.there will be no solution other than to control tobacco much in the same way that the government now controls drugs which could allow people to remain attentive to the seriousness of the effects of these substances,and hopefully to prohibit their usage.范文4Apparently,it would seem that tobacco is totally different substance from drugs,and it can be used freedom by public.In fact,however,our authority should make tobacco illegal as well as drugs,and using of tobacco should be controlled strictly.雅思口语外教一对一陪练，免费试听：ｗｗｗ．２ｕｅｄｕ．ｃｎ；淘宝店：２ｕｅｄｕ．ｔａｏｂａｏ．ｃｎ；Ｑ群：１５４３６６７８８Tobacco only can be used for research and medical purpose.As far as I am concerned,as a kind of dope,tobacco has been widely used to help patients alleviate their pain in surgery.At the same time,ordinary people should not be allowed to access it legally for two main reasons.Among countless factors which influence my inclination,there is a most conspicuous one:it is harmful that smokers addict to tobacco.Many decades ago,scientists have already found that there is a definite link between smoking and bronchial troubles,cardiac disease and lung cancer.More seriously,it not only has negative influence for smokers,but others living or working in same surrounding,even the next generation of a smoking pregnant women may be harmed by so-called“second hand smoking”.Research shows that sometimes“second hand smoking”is more dangerous than smoking directly,because,at least smokers can get the protection from filter tips to some extent.Thus,compared to the hazard of drugs,tobacco can involve more other innocent people and harm their health unknowingly.The second aspect relates to the problem that our natural resources and money are wasted senselessly during the course of planting,transporting and manufacturing tobacco.In light of a statistics,China consumes nearly1,000tons of wood fibers to produce cigarettes annually.Besides,the investment absorbed by tobacco manufacturers every year,is enough to solve all financial troubles that higher education have to face.Obviously,if tobacco is banned by our governments,it means that considerable money will be saved.In summary,judging from all the evidence offered,we may safely arrive at the conclusion that tobacco should be forbidden as well as drugs except for a few special purposes,such as research and medicine.补充With the development of society,our life and working pressure are greater and greater.In this way,a lot of people have become smokers.Tobacco,as a kind of drugs,prevails in the society.Some people hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedom be use,but others,in contrast,deem it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs and that is also my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases,lung cancer,and the immune system diseases.These diseases are all mankind's healthy enemies.The statistics have showed that people who die of the lung cancer,over90%are smokers.In these smokers,85%are chain smoker.So,obviously,there is enormous danger to the human health in smoking.In addition,smoking not only dangerous to smoker,but also do harm to people at smoker's side.The tobacco contains a large number of noxious substances,such as nicotine.Just as a famous physician says,smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chronically.However,the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve,within short time.People,especially,who have heavy working pressure,are prone to produce sense of relying on to cigarette.Moreover,as everyone knows,a lot of countries impose the heavy taxation to tobacco manufacturer and seller,thus,if the tobacco business is considered as the illegal activities,the revenues of the country will be reduced correspondingly.In a word,the danger to people of cigarette is obvious.Though it can help us flee away from pressure,this to use health as cost.Our government should forbid the production of the tobacco,make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.With the development of society,our life and working pressure are[getting]greater and greater.In this way,a lot of people have become smokers.Tobacco,as a kind of drugs,prevails in the society.Some people hold the opinion that tobacco should be given freedom[to]be[used,but others,in contrast,deem[that]it should be made[as]illegal as the same way as other drugs and that is also my point.Medical science proves that smoking can cause the heart diseases,lung cancer,and the immune system diseases.[all of these diseases are enemies of mankind's healthy].The statistics have showed that people who die of the lung cancer,over90%,are smokers.[Among]these smokers,85%are chain smokers.So,obviously,there is enormous danger to the human health in smoking.In addition,smoking not only dangerous to smokers,but also[does]harm to people at smoker's side.The tobacco contains a large number of noxious substances,such as nicotine.Just as a famous physician says,smoking is equivalent to commit suicide chronically.However,the cigarette can really relax our nervous nerve,within short time.People,especially,who have heavy working pressure,are prone to produce sense of relying on to cigarette.Moreover,as everyone knows,a lot of countries impose the heavy taxation to tobacco manufacturer and seller,thus,if the tobacco business is considered as the illegal activities,the revenues of the country will be reduced correspondingly.雅思口语外教一对一陪练，免费试听：ｗｗｗ．２ｕｅｄｕ．ｃｎ；淘宝店：２ｕｅｄｕ．ｔａｏｂａｏ．ｃｎ；Ｑ群：１５４３６６７８８To sum up,the danger to people of cigarette is obvious.Though it can help us flee away from pressure,this to use health as cost.Our government should forbid the production of the tobacco,make our world fresh and nonpoisonous.Although it is a freedom to use tobacco{烟草}while some people think it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs.To what extent do you agree or disagree？What’s your opinion?A:Tobacco should be made illegal,I agree with this idea personally.I hope most drugs can be made illegal,because,as far as I know,they are bad to our health.However,currently most countries still keep it free to use tobacco,and this situation seems to be very hard to change in a short time.From my own experience,using tobacco is not a good thing,especially using is for a long time.It will lead to many kinds of diseases,more importantly,many of them are fatale.One of my friends died from using too much tobacco,and it is believed there are many more people like this.The other thing that I am concerned of is,if a country doesn’t make using tobacco illegal,many young people will have a chance to use it,i.e.students.It is very dangerous,because if someone gets addicted to this when he is very young,he will then almost surely have a big health problem when he is old.I am happy to see that,although it is free to use tobacco in many countries,most of those countries still somehow try not to encourage people using it.For example,tobacco advertisement is banned in many countries,and for many countries,smoking is banned in public places.Overall,most countries are trying to stop the use of tobacco,though it will take sometime.In my opinion,it is essential to limit the use of tobacco,and I hope everyone doesn’t use.Version00108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatersand sports stadiums;they should spend more money on medical care andeducation.Agree or not agree?=================================================范文1Nowadays,the gap between the city and the countryside becomes more and more overt,which arouses colossal concerns.To understand the solution,let’s take a closer look at the causes of the gap at first.The main reason of the gap is the unequal investment between city and rural area.China is a typical example.While more and more money is being invested to the coastal areas and big cities,such as Beijing and Shanghai,the lack of investment barriers greatly the society development of rural area and western regionsThe low education level partly sharps the gap.There is no doubt that the prime force of productivity is education.However,because of poverty,thousands of people go to work without graduating from primary school.The poorer,the few children go to school.This bad cycle finally leads to the dream of rich becoming a dream that is hard to realize.Moreover,the rural area is short of people with high quality.A survey proved that most of university students,whether they come from city or countryside,choose big cities instead of poor areas to work.The rural area can neither adept talent man nor attract talent man.No wonder the gap is increasing largely.Hence,The government ought to knock itself out to decrease the gap as soon as possible.First,balance the investment between city and rural area.In addition,the education level should be improved,especially pay attention on raising high quality people.Besides,let more people realize the latent capacity of rural area in order to attract talent and investment.The set up of CCTV channel12-western region channel is a good example.Only when the ways mentioned above are realized step by step,can the gap between the cities and the countryside be bridged.范文2Nowadays,many people argue against the government putting money onbuilding theaters and sports stadiums.They have claimed that medical careand education would benefit the citizens and the country much more.However,I believe it is worth building more theaters and arenas.雅思口语外教一对一陪练，免费试听：ｗｗｗ．２ｕｅｄｕ．ｃｎ；淘宝店：２ｕｅｄｕ．ｔａｏｂａｏ．ｃｎ；Ｑ群：１５４３６６７８８First,stadiums and arenas provide ideal places for people to have physicalexercises and entertainment.After a whole week’s hardworking,people canenjoy a wonderful football game in the weekend,and refresh themselveswith a good relaxation there.Moreover,the physical exercises are good forpeople’s health,which will ease the pressure of medical care.Second,theaters and museums can be used as base areas of culture and history education.The British Museum,which is the largest one in the world,provides visitors with knowledge about the world culture and the arts.Thevisitors to the museum are all overwhelmed by the magnificence of thecultural and historical displays featuring mankind’s achievements.In addition,the performances shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of citizens.People can enjoy ballet,symphony,and Peking Opera in a theater,which contain the soul of Chinese and western cultures.Third,running theaters and stadiums can earn much money.And this amountof money can do great contribution in other fields,including medical care,and education.After winning the Olympic2008,Beijing made a plan to spend160billion RMB building an Olympic Village.This will surely attract manysports fans to China,which would be much rewarded,not only in economybut the whole society.You can tell form my commentary above,since building theaters and stadiumsbenefit not only individuals but also the state,it is very worthy of theseexpenses.And the government should speed up the pace of the constructions.范文3An argument often heard these days is that whether or not the government should put money on building theaters and stadiums.Some believe that instead of spending money on this area,Medical care and education,both of which are basic developing factors of one country should be spent more money on.After weighting the pros and cons,I disagree with this opinion.Firstly,theaters and stadiums are best choice for people relaxing.Most of workers,especially white collar who often feel nervous after one day’s hard work,need to relax both mentally and pared with staying at home,it is much better way to stay in comfortable theater and listen to a wonderful concert.In addition,going to theaters and stadiums affect the same effect as education and medical care.Having more chances to go to theaters can help them mold character.There is no better way to keep healthy than doing proper sports in the daily.In this way,the culture and health will be improved greatly,which plays the same role of education and medical care.Moreover,theaters and stadiums are basis essential facilities to a developed city.Take holding an Olympic games as an example,it is no doubt it will take millions of money to build stadiums.Why the winner country is proud of that.Because this is a confirmation given by whole world.Of course I don’t mean that the more theaters and stadiums,the better society will be,after all,nothing can take the important place of medical care and education.In summary,the key point is to keep both of this two part developing.Only in this way,can all people live better in future.V108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sports stadiums;they should spend more money on medical care and education.Agree or not agree?Recently,a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much money on building theaters and sports stadiums.They maintain that medical care and education would benefit the citizens and the country much more.However,I advocate building more theaters and arenas.Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building theaters and arenas,but here are two main reasons:What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places for people to build up a world of relaxation.After five days of hardworking,people can refresh themselves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game there.Meanwhile,exercises is to health what water is to fish.The physical exercises can benefit people’s health,which will surely ease the pressure of medical care.Moreover,it provides people a good opportunity to enter into communion with each other,which will benefit people’s mental health.雅思口语外教一对一陪练，免费试听：ｗｗｗ．２ｕｅｄｕ．ｃｎ；淘宝店：２ｕｅｄｕ．ｔａｏｂａｏ．ｃｎ；Ｑ群：１５４３６６７８８Beyond this,it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the“social classroom”of culture and history education.The Sydney Opera House,which is the mother and father of all modern landmark buildings,has come to define not only a city,but also an entire nation and continent.The opera house shows the concept of modernism and the never properly finished inside provides visitors with a story of its creator Jorn Utzon.In addition,the performances which contain the soul of human civilization shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of people from all over the world.Certainly,medical care and education both play dominant roles,but building theaters and sports stadiums will benefit not only the individual both mentally and physically,but a nation and continent permanentlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theaters and sports stadiums;they should spend more money on medical care and education.Agree or not agree?Recently,a criticism often heard is that the government tends to put too much money on building theaters and sports stadiums.They maintain that medical care and education would benefit the citizens and the country much more.However,I advocate building more theaters and arenas.Numerous circumstances lead to the worth of building theaters and arenas,but here are two main reasons:What strikes me most of all is that theaters and sports stadiums provide ideal places for people to build up a world of relaxation.After five days of hardworking,people can refresh themselves by taking physical exercises and enjoining a football game there.Meanwhile,exercises is to health what water is to fish.The physical exercises can benefit people’s health,which will surely ease the pressure of medical care.Moreover,it provides people a good opportunity to enter into communion with each other,which will benefit people’s mental health.Beyond this,it is also of paramount importance to use theaters and museums as the“social classroom”of culture and history education.The Sydney Opera House,which is the mother and father of all modern landmark buildings,has come to define not only a city,but also an entire nation and continent.The opera house shows the concept of modernism and the never properly finished inside provides visitors with a story of its creator Jorn Utzon.In addition,the performances which contain the soul of human civilization shown in the theaters will also greatly enrich the lives of people from all over the world.Certainly,medical care and education both play dominant roles,but building theaters and sports stadiums will benefit not only the individual both mentally and physically,but a nation and continent permanentlyV108Some people said the government shouldn't put money on building theatres and sports stadiums,they should spend more money on medical care and education.Agree or not agree?Government,as the controller of the macroeconomy,usually put large amount of money on building theatres and sports stadiums to stimulate the consumption.Especially when globle economy is in recession,stimulation is one of the methods for government to catch the economy’s fall.However,to my opinion,government should spend more money on medical care and education.For men,health and education are the basic elements for development.We often say health is the best wealth.Without health,even if you are a millionaire you will not enjoy your life.The society needs more medical care to ensure people to live happily and create more fortune.This is a physical base for development of society.The spiritual foundation should be obtained from education.Only with more knowledge,can we catch up with the improvement of economy,society and technology.We need healthy people and brilliant minds to change our world into a better one.Theatres and sports stadiums are signs for higher standard of pared with the basic development factors,they are minor.Insufficiency in medical care and education will impose great stress on poor people and produce unstable factors for society.If government invested too much on recreational places,it has to lessen the expenditure on medical care and education since the total amount of distributable money will not be changed.Such action will do little influence on riches,but affect poors greatly.They can’t take out money from their own pockets to see doctors nor pursue higher education.Dissatisfaction for government will arise gradually.Then,how long the government can exist with the society fluctuated?雅思口语外教一对一陪练，免费试听：ｗｗｗ．２ｕｅｄｕ．ｃｎ；淘宝店：２ｕｅｄｕ．ｔａｏｂａｏ．ｃｎ；Ｑ群：１５４３６６７８８。

【精编范文】G类雅思写作7分范文欣赏-实用word文档本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==G类雅思写作7分范文欣赏Some people say that older people should live with their adult children . Others say that they shouldnt . Which do you think is good practice .One of the topics in daily life is whether or not the older people should live with their adult children . My answer is the question is that it is better for them not to .Firstly , people of different ages have different ways of life . The old people like a quiet , peaceful and regular life whereas the young prefer noises , activities and unrestrained enjoyment . If they live together , old may feel that they are always disturbed and the young may feel that they are often handicapped .Secondly , people of different generations have different views and values . What is quite normal to the parents may seem to be old - fashioned or wrong to the children . When they live together , they may disagree on matters ranging from minor domestic matters to national and international issues . Consequently , family life may be unpleasant or even unbearable to both the old and the young .Last but not the least , adult children , like their parents , love independence and freedom , but their parents still take them as children and unintentionally interfere in their affairs . The situation will be worse if the adult children are already married . In this case , the children have already built a new and closed world and any outside interference may lead to conflicts .。

雅思大作文真题范文精选雅思大作文真题范文：怎样增加年轻人对本国历史人物的兴趣程度?下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

雅思大作文真题范文：怎样增加年轻人对本国历史人物的兴趣程度?Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country.Why is this?What can be done to increase young people’s interest in famous people in the history of their country?今天许多年轻人对国际流行音乐和电影明星的了解比他们国家历史上的名人还要多。

这是为什么呢?怎样做才能提高年轻人对本国历史上名人的兴趣?类型媒体类题目Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country.Why is this?What can be done to increase young people’s interest in famous people in the history of their country?范文解析本题讨论现在的年轻人对国际娱乐明星比对他们自己国家的名人感兴趣的原因以及如何提高年轻人对历史名人兴趣。

题目类型是议论文的现象类题目，题目的问法是“ Why is this? What can be done...”类型，可以采用4段式作文结构。

文章结构P1：引入话题+指出原因P2：指出主要原因之一：大众媒体过度宣传以及邀请国际娱乐明星做广告是引起这一现象的主要原因。

雅思写作7分范文构造雅思写作7分范文构造It is right that college graduates earn higher salaries than the lesswell-educated in the munity. But they should also pay the full cost of theirstudy. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Some conclude that college students should bear total expenses for theirhigher learning on the generalization that college graduates usually receivehigher salaries for similar jobs than those without a college degree. We cannotdeny that higher level of education, indeed, does associate with better ine.Still, built on such fact alone, the conclusion remains questionable.The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always thecase that people with higher education make more money than those lesswell-educated. But salary or ine is, in most cases, based on contributionsmade by employees to panies or organizations in which they work for.Statistics in the labor market indicate thatpeople with professional trainingtend to find jobs easier than college graduates do and that blue-collar workerswho do not hold college degrees are being the hotties in the labor market.Employers prefer to hire and pay more to highly skilled and specially trainedpeople rather than fresh college graduates. In the auto industry, for instance,skilled technicians make two or three times more than their college educatedcounterparts who make the average salaries in other panies. And it is widelyaccepted that people’s ine is determined more by talent, hard work, andwillingness to take risks than solely by certain qualifications such as collegeeducation. Otherwise, the unemployment rate of college graduates would not beincreasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of powerin controlling the labor market. Admittedly in some knowledge extensive fieldsuch as research, teaching, and practice of law the labor force are primarilyconsists of highly educated professionals. But such people make up only afraction of the labor market and are thus unrepresentative of the wholeemployment in general.Considering the goal of education, we find that it is even more problematicfor the country to throw all the responsibility of financing college educationto college students. The goal of higher education of a nation is to improve andstrengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of itslabor force, thereby increasing the petency of the nation in the globaleconomy. As tax payers, parents all contributes to the education system andcountry in various ways. It is only reasonable and necessary that the countrygives some forms of financially assistance to students to ease the burden ofrising education costs. Such help should go not only to students from needy orimpoverished families but also to outstanding students from affluentbackgrounds. Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children frommillions of families to engage in higher level of study. It is understandablethat the general quality of people in a country will improve and its economywill benefit both now and in years to follow.If the burden of supporting children’s higher education is dumped on parentsand students, thousands of brilliant students will be deprived of chances topursue their academic inspiration. Among those who suffer would definitely befuture great scientists, business managers,artists and statesmen. The loss willbe disastrous and irreversible.In conclusion, the idea that students should also pay the full cost of theirstudy is wrong and harmful because it is wrong to assume that higher educationnecessarily equalize high ine. Moreover, it is in the best interest of anation to take responsibility in financing college education so that the goal ofhigher education will be better met.雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A person should never make an important decision alone.Model Answer:From my everyday experience and observation I can claim that discussion of animportant decision with other people bring many benefits. In the followingparagraphs I will give my reasons to defend this statement.First of all, different people have different opinions. In order to make theright choice people should discuss every possible decision and its consequences.Making an important decision alone can bring many negative aspects. Forinstance, a person can reveal his selfishness or impatience and the consequencesof that decision can affect many people in the future. I think that a good andwise decision can be born only in discussion because people can share theirknowledge and experiences a look at the problem from different sides andaspects.Second of all, I think that making decision alone is unacceptable especiallyfor a pany. Imagine that a chief makes the decision about increasing aproduction line without discussing it with his employees. In this case a part ofpany's profit will be spending on extended purchase of raw materials. So,share holders will be left without dividends. This decision may lead to gettingrid of pany's shares and as a result of this declining the value of a panyas a whole.To sum up, I think that a person should always consult his relatives orcolleges when making an important decision to avoid possible mistakes.雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文What discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people inyour country?Model Answer:I am from Russia. From my opinion the most beneficial discovery for people inour country has been the discovery of the outer space. Russia is the firstcountry that launched a spacecraft with a man on the board into the space. Thisevent was a big step towards the new discoveries and brought many benefits notonly for people in my country. Bellow I will give my reasons to support myanswer.First of all, all humankind made a huge step towards the mystery of ourcreation. Scientists had the opportunity to do the new research and experiments.Many new discoveries were made on the boards of the spacecrafts in the outerspace. People from all over the world watched these events. Many books with realcolorful photos were written about the beginning of the space exploration.Nowadays we have a big station called “Mir” in the outer space created on thebase of collaboration USA and Russia. Many people work there doing amazingexperiments.Second of all, the world became “smaller”. People learnt how to exchangeinformation very quickly by use of satellites. Television is broad-casted allover the world by use of satellites. Here in Houston I can watch Russianprograms. People got the opportunity to exchange news very quickly.To sum up, I believe that space exploration will bring much more benefits inthe future and someday we will learn what is beyond our current galaxy.。

雅思7分作文1．The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive. What are your opinions on this?The Internet has brought significant changes to our lives in recent years. Yet, there remains some disagreementas to whether the overall effect of this technology has been positive or negative. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that the benefits of the Internet far outweigh its drawbacks. These benefits are twofold.First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the Internet has revolutionized the way we communicate. Despite therisk of social isolation—a problem occasionally seen in people who spend too much time at their computer terminal rather than relating to people in the real world--- most of us have benefited greatly from e-mail and internet chat programs like MSN Messenger. These incredibly useful and powerful tools of communication facilitate both contact with loved ones in faraway places and global trade.Equally importantly, though, the Internet has placed the entire world (and all of the information in it) at our fingertips. In earlier times, conducting research entailed long hours searching library shelves. Now, however, thesame information can be accessed at the click of a button. Admittedly, not all of the information available on theInternet is reliable or helpful---there is a vast amount of material online that some would consider offensive or dangerous, ranging from pornography to instructions on how to make bombs. Nonetheless, I would contend thatthis free flow of information has generally been a very positive development.By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that the Internet has had a positive impact on modernlife because of its influence on communication and the flow of information.2．Fast food is now universally available in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this?The past 50 years have seen a dramatic increase in the availability of fast food. Some laud its convenience and relatively low cost; however, in this essay I intend to argue that this kind of food is detrimental both to the individuals that consume it and to society at large. There are two primary reasons for this.First of that, it is an undeniable fact that consuming fast food to excess results in serious health problems. Foodssuch as fried chicken, hamburgers and chips---which are incredibly high in fat and salt---are responsible for such ailments as high blood pressure, obesity and heart disease. Moreover, although I certainly agree that fast food isboth affordable and convenient, the cost and inconvenience of treating the illnesses it causes in later life are significant. In order words, while fast food is beneficial in the short term, its long-term effects are generally negative.Further and even more importantly, though, some fast food chains deliberately attempt to attract children in order to shape their future eating habits. One particularly good example of this is the character Ronald McDonald---the bright clothes and smile of the McDonald clown are a beacon to children. Having grown up eating in McDonald restaurants, people are likely to continue eating there throughout their adult lives. It is also interesting to note that McDonald provides playgrounds and frequently holds children’s birthday parties in order to attract young childrenand their parents.By way of conclusion, I believe that fast food will continue to become more popular as the pace of life increases.Given the health risks associated with this trend, I believe that public education campaigns warning people aboutthe dangers of fast food would be warranted.3．International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a position trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this?The past 50 years have seen a considerable increase in global tourism. Despite the undeniable economic prosperity it has brought to many host countries, I would argue that the overall impact of international holidaymaking has in fact been negative. Two of the primary drawbacks associated with this trend are as follows.First of all, global tourism tends to export many negative aspects of western culture. Since it is only the wealthy who can afford to travel abroad, developing countries like Thailand and Indonesia have become the playgrounds of tourists from more affluent ones. In many such nations, this influx of mainly western tourists hasbrought with it problems such as prostitution as well as alcoholism and drug abuse. Admittedly, international tourism does have the potential to foster greater understanding and tolerance between people of different cultures. However, this is unlikely to occur while it remains such a potent symbol of western cultural domination and moral decadence.Even more disturbing, though, is the environmental degradation that international tourism has caused in manyparts of the world. One particularly salient example of this is the Great Barrier Reef in Australia --- the countlessboats, divers and snorkelers that have visited the reef over the past few decades have gradually destroyed vast sections of coral. Similarly, world renowned Kuta Beach in Bali has become heavily polluted in recent years. Inorder to be sustainable, greater regulation of global tourism is required.In conclusion, the challenges presented by the booming international tourist industry are numerous and complex. Although they are by no means insurmountable, it is highly unlikely that they will be resolved in the foreseeable future.4. Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order to become integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon their old ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior. Do you agree or disagree?These days, it seems that more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. This raises certain questions about the integration of newcomers into society. Although there are valid arguments to the contrary, inthis paper I will argue that it is the responsibility of immigrants to adapt to accepted rules of behavior in their adopted country, both written and unwritten. The reasons for this are twofold.Firstly, it is vitally important that newcomers observe the laws of their adopted country for the sake of socialorder. Imagine the chaos that would ensure if people refused to drive on the same side of the road. It is, therefore, necessary for all immigrants to ensure that they observe the law in their new country regardless of any differencesto laws in their home country. Two further instances of practices which are permitted in some countries but prohibited in orders are the possession of firearms and gambling.Secondly and more importantly, though, in order to maintain societal cohesion it is essential that newcomersrespect the social norms of their adopted country. Of course, having a mixture of different cultures and traditionsgives a country colour and vibrancy; however, I would contend that too much cultural diversity undermines a society by alienating people from each other. It is my belief that similarities unite people, whereas differences havea tendency to divide. A strong society is a homogenous society with shared values and goals.By way of conclusion, I believe that this issue is likely to become even more important in the future as bordersbetween countries become increasingly blurred. It, therefore, demands our further consideration.5. Men and women are difficult in terms of their characteristics and abilities. For this reason,some jobs are better done by men and others by women. Do you agree or disagree?These days, it seems that more women are entering “male occupations” than ever before and vice vers some still hold to the conservative view that certain jobs are better performed by men and others by women, it ismy personal belief that people of either sex are capable of doing any job effectively. The reasons for my positionare as follows.First of all, I believe it is a mistake to base our views on broad generalizations about the characteristics of menand women as such stereotypes are often inaccurate. Although there are certainly traits which are typical of menand others which are typical of women, there are exceptions to every rule. Not all women are physically weak, justas not all men are poor interpersonal communicators; conventional gender roles are not appropriate for everybody.If a man or woman desires to pursue a career which is traditionally reserved for the opposite sex, I believe he/sheshould be provided the opportunity to prove him/herself capable.Secondly, I would contend that the presence of both males and females in a workplace brings a sense ofbalance. Men and women frequently, though by no means always, have different methods of doing things. Ratherthan judging these differences to be weaknesses, I feel that we should view them as opportunities for innovationand the discovery of more effective and efficient work practices. A person’s weaknesses can thus be transformedinto strengths.In summary, I once again reaffirm my position that both male and female employees are an asset to anyindustry and as our stereotypes about men and women are not always appropriate, we must not discourage anyonefrom choosing an occupation simply because of his/her gender.6. Smoking i s a major cause o f serious i llness and death throughout the world today. In theinterest of public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. Do you agree or disagree?There are widely differing views on the issue of whether tobacco should be banned or not.Some people would suggest that it is their right to smoke and that prohibiting cigarettes would be aviolation of their civil liberties; however, I personally believe that tobacco should indeed be madeillegal. There are two principal reasons for this.One point which I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that tobacco is a drug. Themajority of governments around the world take a prohibitionist approach to the problem of substanceI believeabu se. If governments wish to be consistent in pursuing their “war on drugs”, therefore,they must ban tobacco as well. This is particularly heroin and marijuana---have legitimate medical applications, while tobacco has none.However, perhaps the strongest argument in favor of banning cigarettes and other tobaccoproducts is that of public health. It is an irrefutable fact that smoking leads to lung cancer and othersuch potentially fatal diseases. Pro-smoking groups would no doubt argue that each individual hasthe right to determine what goes into his/her own body. Nevertheless, I would suggest that theinterests and rights of society at large must override those of the individual. The medical treatmentthat smokers require is often incredibly costly, and it is frequently governments and society thatcover these costs rather than the individual smoker. Hence, I feel that laws prohibiting smokingwould be entirely justified.In reality, of course, the widespread prohibition of smoking is unlikely in the near future. However, given the seriousness o f the problems that it causes, I believe that this should be theultimate goal.7. Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources. Do you agree or disagree?The issue of whether we should attempt to save endangered species from extinction or not is certainly a contentious one. Despite the arguments of some people that such animals serve no useful purpose and should beallowed to die out just as many others (including the dinosaurs) have in the past, it is my personal belief that theyshould in fact be preserved. Two of the principal reasons for this are as follows.Firstly, it is vital that we appreciate the importance of endangered species in maintaining the balance of nature. Ecosystems are delicate arrangements where plants and animals all depend on each other for survival. The disappearance or introduction of any animal species disrupts the balance and negatively impacts upon otherplants and animals by breaking the food chain and altering the habitat in which they live. Such imbalances frequently return to haunt us in unexpected ways. Just as rabbits that were introduced to Australia soon after European settlement now compete with native species for food and destroy farmers’ crops, the extinction of apredator can cause plagues by allowing its prey to multiply unchecked. Therefore, since ecological change constitutes a potential risk to us and our environment, it is clearly I our own interests to protect endangered species.Yet, perhaps the strongest argument in favor of preserving endangered species is that all life has intrinsic value; even if endangered species are not useful to us in any practical way they should be preserved nevertheless.Further, given that we humans are responsible for destroying the natural habitat of many endangered animals, weshould make every possible effort to save them.In conclusion, I once again restate my view that saving endangered species is worthwhile. Not only do theyhelp to maintain the balance of nature, but they also have value in and of themselves.8. With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted that families today are not as close as they used to be. Discuss the causes of this problem and offer some possible solutions to it.Divorce and family breakdown were virtually unheard of just 100 years ago. Now, however, almost half of allmarriages fail. This phenomenon is symptomatic of the growing distance between family members in modern society. In this essay, I intend to explore the sources of this problem along with some possible solutions to it.Chief among the causes of this problem is the modern lifestyle. Today’s parents have to work harder thanthose of previous generations to support their families. Traditionally, one parent assumed the role of breadwinner,while the other---typically the mother----acted as the homemaker. Recently, though, double income families havebecome the norm. Consequently, an increasing number of children now grow up in a parentless environment.Little wonder, then, that they feel alienated. Another contributing factor is the passive and solitary nature of manymodern forms of entertainment.In order to resolve this sense of alienation within families, I believe we must first address its root causes. Perhaps the most effective method of doing this would be for governments to offer financial incentives to parentswho choose to remain at home and take care of their families. Admittedly, such incentives would probably not full compensate couples for lost income; however, they would at least soften the hardship of living on a single incomeand provide an alternative for parents who would rather remain at home but are unable to do so because of financial constraints. One further measure would be to promote more interactive leisure activities in the community through public education campaigns.In conclusion, I believe that this is clearly a problem of such complexity that to no solution is likely in theshort term. However, I believe that the measures outlined above would constitute a good first step.。