文体学正文分析
- 格式:doc
- 大小:90.00 KB
- 文档页数:14
文体学视角下的语篇赏析侯丽琼【摘要】文章以教材中的语篇作为分析素材,通过实例,探讨了在这些语篇中的文体关注及文体分析方法是如何通过作者在作品中的语言来实现的,包括排比、对偶、重复、替代、省略等;对这一问题的研究目的在于说明文体分析是一种有效的语篇分析方法,有利于从不同角度逐步提高阅读和鉴赏能力。
【期刊名称】《兰州教育学院学报》【年(卷),期】2012(028)009【总页数】3页(P49-51)【关键词】语篇;文体关注;文体分析【作者】侯丽琼【作者单位】重庆电子工程职业学院,重庆401331【正文语种】中文【中图分类】H319一、文体和文体分析文体是指某一语篇使用语言的特色和表现风格,狭义的文体指文学文体,广义的文体指包括文学文体在内的各种语言变体[1]。
文体学是一门很实用的学科,语言在特定的社会情境中所产生的表达效果和交际功能,就是文体学通过研究各种语篇在语音、词汇、句法、修辞等多个层面上突出的语言特征以及它们在具体的语境里的文体效果来实现的[2]。
文体学研究的重要方法是文体分析。
文体分析是对特定语篇所选择语言成分的得体性进行分析。
那么,应如何进行文体分析?文体分析分析什么?“如何进行文体分析”,这是文体学研究中的一个重要问题,涉及文体分析的方法问题。
英国文体学家Short(1997)曾把文体分析概括为三个步骤:描写、阐释和评价[3],这三个步骤是互相关联的。
最先适用于文学文体,后来随着语言学的发展,这一模式也可用于非文学文体。
描写主要着眼于语言现象和事实,是对语言本身进行形式上的描述;阐释是与描写联系在一起的,是文本分析重要的核心部分,主要说明语言现象所具有的文体特征以及文体特征在文章中所起的作用和起到什么文体效果;评价是对语言现象和文体效果在具体的语篇中怎样才能获得其特定的意义,挖掘作者的语用意图,达到鉴赏的目的。
“文体分析分析什么”,这是文体学研究中另一重要问题,涉及文体分析的内容或对象。
文体学在文学分析中的运用文体学是研究各种文体的学科,是一种对语言风格研究的学科。
在此所说的文体学是指从语言学的角度对文学作品语篇的整体研究。
所谓文学作品语篇,是指把文学作品看作是一种作为特殊的交际行为而对语言的应用。
作为介于文学批评和语言学之间的交叉学科,文体学是从文学作品的语篇分析与研究中去归纳文学作品的语言和文体特点。
文体学的宝贵之处在于它能在文学作品和读者的语言经验之间建立起一种联系,通过这种联系读者可以感悟生活并拓展其生活经验,达到作品对读者产生影响和共鸣的效果。
一、传统文本分析的局限性传统的文学作品研究是文学评论家和文学理论家的主要工作。
而出于不同的目的,语言学家也把文学作品当作自己的研究对象。
文学评论家主要致力于文学作品的艺术价值、对人生的启示和对现实生活的反映等方面的研究;而语言学家则是从文学作品的语言中寻找和归纳语言规则,或用文学作品中的语言运用来演示语言规则。
1.语法分析的局限性一般来说,语法只研究语言的结构方式、词的组成以及它们的变化,也就是语言的活动信息职能。
它们不管语言材料所适应的交际领域和具体环境,不考虑语言的表现职能。
传统的语言学分析方法是把文学作品看作独立语言应用来进行语法分析,或用文学作品来演示语言规则的应用。
这种分析方法对于文本语法结构层面可以分析得很透彻,有助于我们理解作品结构与语法应用,但是其中也存有一些问题。
虽然大多数文学作品中的大多数语句是符合语法规则的,但是总有一部分语句或词的用法,是不能够用语法去解释的,是不符合语法规则的。
如在英语中,定冠词有几种功能已在英语语法中得到确定。
一般功能是它的“特指”功能,也就是它与其一齐出现的名词或名词性词组共同表示一个具体的物。
这种“特指”功能一般以三种具体形式体现:第一种表示所指物包含在一个前置或后置的修饰语中。
例如:thewhitesculptureinthetemple在该词组中,前置修饰语white和后置修饰语inthetemple确定sculpture是指某个特定的sculpture,我们一般称这种冠词功能是代指后项的。
文体与文体学讲义第一章文体与文体学In this chapter, two major concerns will be presented, one is the definition, the origin, goal, and procedure of stylistics, another the definition of style, which is a heated discussion in academic areas.Part I Stylistics1 Definition of StylisticsStylistics in simple terms means the study of style.Widdowson (1975:3), “By stylistics, I mean the study of literary discourse from a linguistics orientation and I shall take the view that what distinguishes stylistics from literary criticism on the one hand and linguistics on the other hand is that it is essentially a means of linking the two.”Leech, holds a similar view. He defines stylistics as “the study of the use of language in literature”(1969:1), and considers stylistics a “meeting-ground of linguistics and literary study”(1969:2) From what Widdowson and Leech say, we can see that stylistics is an area of study which straddle two disciplines: literary criticism and linguistics.It takes literary discourse (text) as its object of study and uses linguistics as a means to that end. Now stylistics has developed into an interdisciplinary area of study with explicit aims and effective techniques, and promises to offer useful insights into literary criticism and the teaching of literature.English stylistics has developed on the basis of traditional rhetoric which may be traced back to Aristole’s time. Nevertheless, it was the ‘three revolutions’ in social science that brought it to the right track and brought it about its present status.One of the revolutions is the modernist movement in art and literature, lasting from 1890 to the beginning of World War II. To a great extent, the revolution was a break with tradition in the ways it influenced both the content and language of literature. From this movement onwards, creative writers exercise no restraints on the sort of language they use in their writing. In modernist literature, readers could find much to surprise them in respect to content as well as language.Another revolution is the one in literature criticism which has had a profound and radical influence on stylistics. In the 1930’s, the critical theorist, I.A. Richards, expressed his dissatisfaction with those critics of his age. In his opinion, they seemed to be too much preoccupied with literature’s role in educating the readers morally and emotionally. He called for a more objective approach to literary texts. in his famous book, Practical criticism, he established an approach to poetry which depend on close reading of the text. He was joined by scholars such as Willian Empson whose work Seven Types of Ambiguity had a wide influence and promoted the concept of ambiguity as a defining linguistic characteristic of poetry. Their insistence on close reading of the text and analysis of language of the text coincides with the starting point of stylistics, thus greatly facilitating its development.The third revolution took place in linguistic science starting in the late 1950. It was initiated by the work of Noam Chomsky and Michael Halliday whose thoughts were directly or indirectly influenced by the linguistic theory of F. de Sassure, the founder of modern linguistics. Chomsky’s transformational-generative grammar revealed a system of surface structure and deep structure in English syntax. It also brought about a new awareness of how the human mind is innately able to systematize reality by the use of language. Halliday’s systemic grammar has offered many insights into the methods of text analysis, particularly in respect of cohesion between sentences in discourse. The work done in the field of linguistics in the last three decades has provided the stylistician with effective and completely new tools for investigating language in use in both literature and other types of discourse. The above mentioned revolutions, in their own ways, have played a fundamental role in shaping stylistics into the important interdisciplinary field of academic study that it is today.1.2 The origin of stylistics and its research school文体学首先来自于古代的修辞学,来自于亚里斯多得的修辞论。
从文体学角度分析拉迪亚德吉卜林的诗篇《如果》张栋; 冯力【期刊名称】《《湖北成人教育学院学报》》【年(卷),期】2019(025)005【总页数】4页(P89-92)【关键词】主题思想; 音韵; 结构; 修辞【作者】张栋; 冯力【作者单位】长江职业学院武汉430074【正文语种】中文【中图分类】H315众所周知,文体学是一门“既古老又年轻”的学科。
“古老”是因为它是在西方传统修辞学(Rhetoric)基础上发展起来的;“年轻”则是由于直到20世纪初,人们才开始运用现代语言学的原则和分析方法探讨文体的问题。
文体学致力于研究文本的体裁特征,从而发现其内在本质和规律。
它既分析作家的文学风格,研究代表作品特点的语言变体,又运用现代语言学理论研究包括文学文体在内的各类文体,如公文文体、广告文体、新闻报道文体、口语文体以及其他书面文体。
刘世生(1994)根据Carte等的研究,将文体学的发展归为形式文体学、功能文体学、语篇文体学和社会历史文体学等四大类。
本文所分析的诗歌《如果》,属于语篇文体学的领域范围。
拉迪亚德·吉卜林(Rudyard Kipling 1865—1936)是英国小说家和诗人。
他一生共创作了八部诗集、四部长篇小说、二十一部短篇小说集和历史故事集,以及大量散文、随笔和游记等。
由于观察的能力、新颖的想象、雄浑的思想和杰出的叙事才能,拉迪亚德·吉卜林于1907年获得诺贝尔文学奖,成为英国第一位获此奖的作家。
诗篇《如果》原是拉迪亚德·吉卜林写给自己儿子的一首励志诗,用来勉励他要勇于接受挑战,战胜困难。
该诗立意于“克制”和“淡泊”。
本文通过从文体学视角对《如果》诗篇进行解读与分析,让诗歌中所展示的传统价值观再度浮现,以便勉励现代的人们,给这个社会的浮躁降降温。
一、《如果》的主题思想解析拉迪亚德·吉卜林在诗中假设了十四个如果,每个如果都是任何一个人在一生中可能遇到的,涵盖了为人、处事、人格、奋斗、意志以及修养等方面。
从女性主义文体学的角度分析海明威作品《老人与海》与《在密执安北京》的开题报告
女性主义文体学是一种应用女性主义理论于文本分析的方法。
这种方法着重关注文本中的性别问题,探讨作品中的女性形象、性别角色和权力关系等方面。
在海明威的作品中,女性形象并不是主要的话题,但是《老人与海》与《在密执安北京》中存在着可以用女性主义文体学分析的部分。
《老人与海》是一篇以男性为主要主角的小说。
小说中的男性角色桑提亚哥是一个渔夫,他被描写为坚韧、勇敢、坚强的人。
而在小说的情节中,出现了一个女性的形象——桑提亚哥的妻子。
尽管她没有出现在故事的主要情节中,但是她是桑提亚哥生活的一部分,并对他的生活产生了影响。
这个女性形象的存在,可以用女性主义文体学的角度来理解。
虽然这个女性形象在小说中并不是主角,但是她的存在也说明了在男性角色的生活中,女性的地位和角色是存在的。
因此,这种女性形象的存在也与海明威的男性主义立场相矛盾。
《在密执安北京》则更加贴近女性主义问题。
小说中的主角是一个女性,她面对着一系列的性别障碍和歧视。
在小说的情节中,女主角被认为不能胜任行政助手的工作,因为她是女性,并且被指责过于“敏感”。
这个女性主角面对的问题,是女性主义文体学所关注的问题。
小说中描写了女性在社会、职场中所面临的性别歧视和不公平待遇,也呈现了女性对于这些问题的反抗和抵抗。
综上所述,海明威的作品《老人与海》与《在密执安北京》中都存在可以用女性主义文体学分析的部分。
通过女性主义文体学的角度,我们可以更深入地探讨作品中存在的性别问题,也可以对作者的立场和观点进行解读。
从文体学角度分析《橘子和苹果》邱小梅【摘要】<橘子和苹果>是加拿大女作家艾丽丝·门罗的短篇小说.她的小说多集中于描绘加拿大乡村居住者的情感生活.本文试图从文体学角度分析<橘子和苹果>,包括以下两个方面:叙述者和叙述角度:小说中的对话.【期刊名称】《和田师范专科学校学报》【年(卷),期】2010(029)004【总页数】2页(P102-103)【关键词】文体学;叙述者;叙述角度;小说中的对话【作者】邱小梅【作者单位】广西师范大学外国语学院,广西桂林,541004【正文语种】中文艾丽丝·门罗(Alice Munro)也许是世界上最好的在世短篇小说女作家。
她在文坛的地位,好比当代契诃娃——契诃夫的女传人。
在40余年的文学生涯中,门罗女士始终执著地写作短篇小说,锤炼技艺,并以此屡获大奖,其中包括三次加拿大总督奖,两次吉勒奖,以及英联邦作家奖、欧亨利奖、笔会/马拉穆德奖和美国全国书评人奖等。
每年秋天诺贝尔文学奖猜谜大赛,她的大名必在候选人之列。
1968年,37岁的她终于出版了首部短篇小说集《好荫凉之舞》(Dance of the Happy Shades)。
晚熟的果子格外香甜,这本迟到的处女作为她一举赢下加国最高文学奖——总督奖。
此后一帆风顺,三年后再出《女孩与女人们的生活》(Lives of Girls and Women),由于所收篇目内容连贯,因此一度作为“长篇小说”发行。
1978年和1986年,门罗女士先后以《你以为你是谁?》(Who Do You Think You Are?)和《爱的进程》(The Progress of Love),获得了她第二及第三个总督奖。
作家在进行创作时,可以以作家本人真实的身份叙述或描写事态发展,可以假冒他人以“我”的口吻进行叙述;也可以从小说中的某一人物的角度去观察和描写事物;还可以超脱一切,以一个第三者或旁观者的身份来进行客观的描述。
文体分析作者:袁萍来源:《青年与社会》2011年第02期摘要:这篇文章,作者将从文体分析的角度,采用语篇分析模式来对本演讲中的第一、二段内容的语音、词汇、语义、句法特征进行分析,加深对课文的理解和欣赏。
关键词:文体分析;公众演讲;高级英语教学一、公众演讲特点公众演讲有其独特的文体特征,比如,语音方面,各种语音手段的应用如压韵,节奏,重音,停顿的应用在英语演讲中的应用十分常见。
词汇方面,演说者会使用较长的词语,名词短语也经常被使用,是公众演讲通常会使用第一人称代词和第二人称代词,而第三人称代词较少使用。
句法方面,经常使用的句型有陈述句,长句。
语义方面,修辞手法是其重要特点,经常使用的修辞手段有暗喻、明喻、类比、拟人等。
二、对演讲的具体分析(一)语音特征1.头韵alliteration:dull, drilled, docile,也叫头字母押韵,是语音中重复使用某一音而取得突出效果的一种重要方式。
三个词以同样的音开头,更增加了话语的力量,说话者的决心,及对纳粹的厌恶和痛恨,更能激起听众的同感。
2. 拟声词:clanking, heel-clicking 中/kl/音和dull, drilled, docile中的 /d/音,一方面使人联想到军械革履的碰撞声响,另一方面使人意识到战争的冷酷无情。
3. 除此之外,文中还运用了排比增加文章的节奏感。
(二)词汇特征1. 人称代词的使用:使听众感到亲切,更容易说服听众。
在这篇讲话中, 丘吉尔共使用第一人称代词“I,me"16次,复数代词“we, our, us"27次。
在平时的讲话中,用第一人称复数,有时包括受话人,有时不包括受话人,有时还含有一种间接的祈使命令意义。
丘吉尔巧妙将这三种含义都糅合在他的演讲中,使之循序渐进地起到战争动员的作用。
2. 文学词汇大量使用:使演讲更加正式,稳重,让听众感到演讲人对所讲的话题的态度是极其严肃认真的。
例如,在表达演说者对纳粹的痛恨时,他用到了的词汇有:appetite, racial domination, wichkedness, cruelty, ferocious, hideous , onslaught, clanking, heel-clicking, dandified, cow down ,tye down, dull, drilled, docile, brutish, Hun soldier, locustsvillainous说到苏联时,作者用了以下词汇: guard, pray, till, from time immemorial, bread-winner, champion, wring hardly, primordial, madiens, joys, laugh(三)语义特征在这篇演说中,修辞手法是其重要特点,经常使用的修辞手段有暗喻、明喻、提喻、排比。
文学作品分析方法知识点文学作品分析是文学研究的重要内容,通过对作品的深入分析,可以揭示出其中的意义、主题、风格等关键要素。
在文学作品分析中,掌握一些方法和知识点是非常重要的,本文将介绍一些常用的文学作品分析方法知识点,以助于读者更好地进行文学作品的分析和解读。
一、文本分析文本分析是文学作品分析的基础,要对作品进行深入分析,首先应当从文本本身入手。
文本分析方法包括以下几个方面:1. 细读文本通过反复阅读文本,仔细钻研每一个细节,全面理解作品的内容和结构,把握作品的情节发展和人物塑造。
2. 词汇分析分析作品中的重要词汇、词语的含义和使用,对作品的主题和情感表达进行解读。
3. 句法分析分析作品中的句法结构,把握句子的结构和语法规律,进一步理解作品的表达方式和语言风格。
4. 修辞手法分析分析作品中的修辞手法,如比喻、夸张、拟人等,揭示出作品中的修辞艺术和意义。
二、主题分析主题是作品中最核心的思想或意义,通过主题分析可以深入探讨作品所要表达的核心信息。
主题分析方法包括以下几个步骤:1. 提炼主题对作品进行整体把握,概括出作品的主题,即作品所要表达的核心思想。
2. 分析情节和人物通过分析情节的发展和人物的命运,逐步揭示出作品主题的具体内容和内涵。
3. 对比将作品与其他相关作品进行对比,找出共同的主题和不同之处,进一步理解和说明作品的主题。
三、风格分析风格是作品的独特艺术特点和表现方式,通过风格分析可以深入理解作品的艺术价值。
风格分析方法包括以下几个方面:1. 文学流派分析分析作品所属的文学流派,如现实主义、浪漫主义、现代主义等,揭示出作品的风格特点和思想倾向。
2. 描写方式分析分析作品的描写方式和手法,如写实,象征,抒情等,了解作品的情感表达和艺术效果。
3. 对比将作品与其他相关作品进行对比,找出共同的风格特点和不同之处,进一步理解和评价作品的风格。
四、历史背景分析作品创作的历史背景是理解作品的重要线索,通过历史背景分析可以深入理解作品的时代背景和社会语境。
中国文体学:概念辨析与立场确定一、文体学的概念和内涵文体学最早起源于西方文学批评理论体系,主要研究文学作品的风格、形式特征、修辞手法等内容。
在欧洲文论史上,文体学一直是文学批评的一个重要分支,其研究内容丰富多样,具有很强的理论解释和实践指导性。
在中国,一直以来对文体学的理解和研究都受到西方文论的影响,但同时也受到中国文学特有文化传统和语境的制约,因此对于文体学的理解存在着一定程度的局限性。
从概念上看,文体学主要是研究文学作品的风格、形式和语言特征,它关注的是文学作品的外在表现和内在逻辑关系。
文体学的研究范围涵盖了文学作品的体裁、风格特征、修辞手法、语言表达等多个方面,旨在通过对这些内容的分析和解读,揭示出作品的文体特征和表现形式,帮助读者深入理解和鉴赏文学作品的艺术魅力。
文体学也可以通过对不同文学作品的比较研究,揭示出作品之间的文学流派、传统风格等多种文体特征和文化内涵,为文学批评和文学研究提供理论支持和实践指导。
从内涵来看,文体学具有丰富的理论内涵和方法体系。
文体学研究的主要内容包括:文学作品的文体类型、风格特征、语言表达、审美效果等方面的分析与解读;不同文学作品之间、不同文学流派之间的文体比较研究;文学作品与时代文化、社会风貌等因素之间的关联分析等多个层面。
文体学的研究方法主要包括:比较文学、文学理论、修辞学、语言学、文化研究等学科的交叉融合和互补,形成了一套相对完整的文体分析体系和研究方法。
通过这些理论和方法,文体学可以辅助文学创作、文学批评和文学研究,在文学领域具有重要的理论和实践价值。
二、文体学在中国文论研究中的地位和作用文体学在文学教学和文学创作中也发挥着重要的作用。
通过对文学作品的文体分析和风格鉴赏,文体学可以帮助学生和作家更好地理解和把握文学作品的语言特点、表现形式和艺术魅力,并从中汲取创作灵感和营养。
文体学也可以帮助学生和作家提高语言表达能力和文学鉴赏能力,培养良好的文学素养和审美情趣。
被困的尤利西斯:乔伊斯短篇小说《两个浪汉》的功能文体学分析黄荷;于洋欢【摘要】以功能文体学视角,从小句间配列关系形式、逻辑语义关系类型和序列呈现顺序三个方面考察了詹姆斯·乔伊斯《两个浪汉》中的扩展小句复合体.通过分析小句复合体内部结构,并与具有对照性的文体变异体比较后发现:小说文本中小句的络合虽没有过度复杂的结构和显著的偏离特征,却可凸显出主人公莱尼汉微妙的内心活动和异常的行为举止,进而起到准确塑造人物的效果.因此,《两个浪汉》可以且有必要解读为关于莱尼汉的故事——一个在瘫痪的都柏林中陷入物质和精神双重困境的“尤利西斯”.【期刊名称】《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》【年(卷),期】2018(020)004【总页数】8页(P427-434)【关键词】功能文体学;小句复合体;人物塑造;詹姆斯·乔伊斯;《两个浪汉》【作者】黄荷;于洋欢【作者单位】贵州大学外国语学院,贵州贵阳550025;清华大学人文学院,北京100084【正文语种】中文【中图分类】H030《两个浪汉》讲述了两个都柏林人----莱尼汉与科尔利----间的故事。
乔伊斯曾言,《两个浪汉》是《都柏林人》中最为重要的一篇,也是最令他满意的一篇[1]。
国外对《两个浪汉》也是推崇备至,对其写作手法、叙事安排和主题构建等多个方面展开了深入解读[2-3]。
同时,多位国外功能文体学家从经验、人际及语篇三大元功能入手,展开了多维度的分析:肯尼迪(Chris Kennedy)分析了以莱尼汉和科尔利为参与者的小句中的及物性特征,以及两人对话中对语气的不同选择[4];基于肯尼迪的研究,诺加德(Nina Nørgaard)进一步分析了文本中及物性系统,补充了对情态系统和否定结构的研究,并考察了小说中的衔接方式等等[5-6]。
相比之下,国内对《两个浪汉》的研究明显滞后,对小说中语言机制的探讨更是相形见绌。
就笔者所知,国内期刊上仅有一篇关于《两个浪汉》的文章[7]。
摘要文体分析是建立在语言描写基础之上的。
语言描写在特定社会情境中所产生的表达效果和交际功能是通过特定的语音、词汇、句法特征和语义结构予以体现的。
演讲作为公众场合的一种活动,其语言的应用决定了一场演讲的成败。
演讲的语言风格较为正式,但是为了能使一场演讲成功,其语言风格不能太僵硬也不能太亲密。
本文语音、词汇、句法这个方面来分析美国总统尼克松在一场宴会的演讲。
旨在通过研究这次演讲的内容总结出演讲的语言特征,从而为各界人士在准备演讲时提供参考。
TContents1 Introduction (3)2 Theoretical Foundation (4)2.1 The defination of stylistics....................................................... .. (4)2.2 The linguistic features of stylistic (6)3 Introduction to Public speaking (8)3.1 Introduction to Publish speaking (8)3.2 .The feature of public speaking (8)4 Stylistic Analysis of public speaking (9)4.1Analysis of public speaking at the Syntactic Level (9)4.2Analysis of public speaking at the Lexical Level (11)4.3Analysis of the poem at the phonological Level (13)Conclusion (16)1 IntroductionPublic speaking utilizes a variety of language which is directed towards a specific event or topic .In its broad sense , public speaking includes many types such as reli-gious sermons , lectures at universities , political speeches delivered at public meetings , radio and TV talks etc .In its narrow sense , public speaking only refers to the speech made at public meetings .Hereafter , in this essay , public speaking is accordingly discussed in its narrow sense .For the sake of convenience , public speaking and public speech are roughly used interchangeably .As an example , I will take ” The Speech by Presi-dent Nixon of the United States at the Welcoming Ban-quet” (delivered on Fe b .21 , 1972 on his first visit to China)to study its syntax , vocabulary , phonology and the rhetorical device。
2 Theoretical Foundation2.1 The defination of stylisticsStylistic is a branch of linguistics which studies style in a scientific and systematic way concerning manners/linguistic features of different varieties of language at different levels.2.2 The linguistic features of stylistic2.2.1 The Phonological featurePhonology is used in this book to refer to the system of speech sounds in language, which includes the following aspects: elision, the omission of a sound or sounds in speech; sound symbolism, the symbolic meaning of sounds; sound patterning, the matching of identical or similar sounds between two or more words; rhyme, the repetition of identical end sounds; rhythm, the flow of sounds and their rise and fall, and their accents and pauses;pause, brief interruption of the articulatory process which includes silent pause --- silent breaks between words, and filled pause gaps,which are filled by such expressions as um, er, ah; stress:the pronunciation of a word or syllable with more force than the surrounding words or syllables; tempo, the speed of speaking; intonation patterns, patterns of utterance usually expressed by variations in pitch, loudness, syllable length, and speech rhythm; alliteration, the repetition of an initial sound in two or more words that occur close together; assonance, the repetition of internal vowel sounds in successive words; consonance, partial or total identity of consonants in successive words or syllables whose man vowels differ; onomatopoeia, words containing sounds similar to the noises they describe; pitch, the relative height of speech sounds as perceived by a listener.2.2.2 The Graphological featureGraphology is used in this book to refer to the writing forms, and the signs used in a text, which includes the following aspects: punctuation,the use of punctuation marks; capitalization, the use of capital letters; paragraphing, the way in which a text is divided into paragraphs; italics, words leaning to the right; format of printing, the general arrangement of the printing forms; graphic signs, size or shape of letters, tables, pictures, diagrams, drawings, type style, etc; spelling :normal or deliberate misspelling.2.2.3 The Lexical featureLexis is used in this book to refer to the choice of words, which includes the following aspects: general or specific ( superordinate or subordinate; Anglo-Saxon or Latinate; conceptual or associative (denotative or connotative); monosyllabic or polysyllabic; descriptive or evaluative; formal or informal; standard or non-standard;dynamic or static; vulgar or euphemistic; favorable or unfavorable; Archaic or neologism; common or rare; abstract or concrete.2.2.4 The Syntactic featureSyntax is used in this book to refer to rules for ordering and connecting words into sentences. The syntactic categories include the following aspects: sentence type simple or multiple, major or minor, periodic or loose, etc; sentence length, in number of words;sentence complexity;coordination/subordination/parataxis;noun phrases;clause types, SV, SVA, SVO, SVOA, SVC, SVOO, SVOC, finite/nonfinite, verbless,independent/dependent; phrase types, NP, VP, AdjP, AdvP, PrepP; grammatical constructions, comparative or superlative, coordinative or cataloguing, parenthetical,etc; word order, normal or inverted, etc; tenses, the prevailing tense, simple or complicate, etc; voices, active or passive; grammaticality, grammatical or nongrammatical.2.2.5 Semantic featureSemantics is used in this book to refer to the meaning of words, expressions, etc,and by what means the meaning is conveyed from the addresser to the addressee.Here, our concern is mainly the rhetorical devices, especially figures of speech,which can be roughly divided into eight types: figures of comparison, figures of replacement, figures of repetition, figures of contrast/juxtaposition, figures of double meaning, figures of reverse meaning, figures of resemblance, figures of omission.3.Introduction to Public speaking3.1 Introduction to Public speakingPublic speaking utilizes a variety of language which is directed towards a specific event or topic .In its broad sense , public speaking includes many types such as reli-gious sermons , lectures at universities , political speeches delivered at public meetings , radio and TV talks etc3.2 The feature of public speakingPubic speaking has syntactic , lexical, phonological and rhetorical features.The stylistic features of public speaking can be summarized as follows:The language used in public speaking is formal .Public speaking requires that the language and style be stan-dard and neither too frozen nor too intimate .The use of rhetoric devices makes a speech effective and convincing .4.Stylistic Analysis of public speakig4.1Analysis of public speakig at the Syntactic LevelCompared with other varieties of English , the lan-guage of public speaking is more formal .The seriousness of the speaker' s attitude is revealed in this formality .On the other hand , the language used in public speaking is less formal than that of legal documents and scientific English .Public speaking is a variety that is between spo-ken language and written language .A speech is usually written beforehand and the speaker just recites it from memory or alternatively reads the written speech .Here we can assume that the syntax of public speaking is more complicated than that of conversation and scientific Eng-lish .Nixon' s speech consists of 11 paragraphs , 32 sen-tences , 607 words .The average number of words in each paragraph is 55 .18 .Additionally , on average , there are 18 .97 words in each sentence .The longest sentence in this speech contains 69 words while the shortest contains only three .According to linguistic statistics , the average number of words in each written English sentence is 17 .6 (Wang Zuoliang 1987 :230).From this we can deduce that in public speeches , the sentences are somewhat longer than the averagestandard .In conversation , the av-erage number of words in each sentence is below 10 . Table 1 shows the length of sentences in Nixon' s speech :Words in each Sentence Number ofSentence PercentageLess than 10 9 28 .125%10-15 8 25%16-20 3 9.375%21-30 7 21 .875%31-40 3 9.375%More than 40 2 6 .25%Total 32 100%Table 1Sentence structure in public speaking is generally more complex than that in other varieties ofEnglish .In-complete sentences are very common in conversation .But in public speeches sentences are quite complete and grammatical .Among the 32 sentences in Nixon' s speech , 17 of them are complex sentences which make up 53 . 125 %, while compound and complex -compound sen-tences make up 15 .625 %.Simple sentences make up 31 .125 %.Table 2 shows the sentence structure in Nixon' s speech .Sentence Type Number PercentageSimple Sentence 10 31.25%Complex Sentence 17 53 .125 %Complex -CompoundSentence 3 9 .375%Compound 2 6 .25%Total 32 100%Table 2Various tenses are used in public speaking .Gener-ally , the present tense is the most common form .The use of other tenses depends on what the speaker is talking about .That is to say , whether he speaks about the past , present or future .In Nixon' s speech , there are 68 verb forms (excluding infinitives), of which 53 are in simple present tense .Other tenses are used less often than the simple present tense .Table 3 shows the tenses used in Nixon' s speech .Tenses Number PercentageSimple PresentTense 53 77.94%Simple Past Tense 4 5 .88%Present PerfectTense 5 7 .35%Present ContinuousTense 1 1 .47%Future Tense 5 7 .35%Total 68 100%Table3In public speaking , the use of nominal groups is very complicated .The determiners are put both before and after the head words .But in the majority of cases the determiners are put after the head words .This increases the complexity of nominal groups .For example , 13 at-tributive clauses are used in Nixon' s speech .In public speaking , declarative sentences are often employed .This is because the speaker aims at impressing the audience and persuading them to do what he advo-cates .Declarative sentences are quite effective for this purpose .Of course , other sentence types are also used , such as imperative sentences , interrogative sentences and inverted sentences etc .Take Nixon' s speech as an exam-ple , he used several imperative sentence s .Such as “So , let us , in these next five days , start a long march togeth-er , not in lockstep , but on different roads leading to the same goal ...”Interrogative sentences are also used in Nixon' s speech .For example , “What is the world ?” “What l ega-cy shall we leave for our children ?”Inversion is also used in this speech .For example , “Never have I heard Ameri-can music played better in a foreign land .”4.2 Analysis of public speakig at the Lexical LevelVocabulary used in public speaking is quite formal . The length of words also increases .Consequently , in public speaking , “big words” are used extensively .For example , in Nixon' s speech there are 147 words that con-tain more than six letters .This constitutes 24 .21 %of the total number of words .There are 91 words that contain more than seven letters .This makes up 14 .99 % of the total .In conversation , commentary andadvertisement , words of more than 6 letters only make up less than 20 % of the total ..(Wang Zuoliang 1987 :235)Obviously the ratio of long words in public speaking is higher than that of other varieties mentioned previously .The longest word in this speech contains 18 letters .A number of very for-mal words that seldom appear in daily conversation are employed in public specking .Just cite a few as an exam-ple , Nixon used the following words in his speech “distin-guished , incomparable , hospitality , legacy , magnificent , immeasurably , transcend , compromise , lockstep , plague etc .”The use of these words contribut es significantly to the formality of the style .It gives the audience an impres-sion that the speaker is serious about the topic .The use of formal words also makes the speaker sound more con-vincing .Another tendency in the diction of public speaking is the replacement of verbs with nouns and the substitution of adjectives for nouns .For instance ,the sentence “ …At this very moment through the wonder of telecommunica-tions …” ,The noun phrase “the wonder of telecommunica-tions ,is a replacement of the adjectival phrase “ wonderful telecommunications” .It is obvious that abstract words are frequently used in Nixon' s speech .For example , “ hospitality , frank-ness , difference , greatness” , etc .The use of abstract words is due to the fact that the speaker often talks about some abstract doctrines or ideals .The use of abstract words increases the formality of the speech and makes the speech sound lofty and convincing .Another feature of public speaking is the frequent use of personal pronouns .The first person , both singular form and plural form , is extensively used .The second person is also very often used .But the third person sel-dom appears in public speaking .During the course of the speech , the speaker has to mention himself from time to time .It is only natural for him to use “ I” and “me” . “We” or “us” are very helpful words in public speaking . As “we” includes both the speaker and the listeners and the use of “we” and “us” indicates that the speaker puts himself “in the same boat”with t he listeners .To be more exact , the use of “we” and “us” shows clearly that the speaker is on the side of hisaudience .This shortens the distance between the speaker and the audience so that it arouses the audience' s affirmative feelings and sympathet-ic responses .Further more , “we” is a mild way of re-questing and commanding .The speaker calls upon his lis-teners by using “we” .In Nixon' s speech , 40 personal pronouns are used .“I (me)” , “we (us)” are used 34 times .The use of “we” and “us” makes up 60 % of the total .4.3Analysis of public speakig at the Phonological LevelMany phonological devices such as prosody , intona-tion , rhyming , assonance , alliteration etc .are employed in public speaking to intensify the effect .Though a speech is delivered orally , it differs greatly from conversa-tion .All the words are spelt and said in their complete forms .Abbreviations of words and elisions of sounds rarely appear in public speaking .Take Nixon' s speech as an example , such words as “we have , we will , cannot , let us , there is” are not spelt and said as “we' ve , we' ll , can' t , let' s , there' s ” .The absence of abbreviations and elisions maintains the formality of style .Alliteration is employed in Nixon ' s speech to achieve the beauty of sound .For instance , “Mr .Prime Minister , I wish to thank you for your very gracious andeloquent remarks .At this very moment through the won-der of telecommunications , more people are seeing and hearing what we say than on any other such occasion in the whole history of the world .Yet , what we say here will not be long remembered .What we do here can change the world .”In this short paragraph , the sound /w/ is repeat-ed 11 times .When reading the speech we find that it is very rhythmical .Rhythmic speech is easy to read and pleasing to the ears .This can be easily recognized in Nixon' s speech .Take the third paragraph as an example , “As you said in your toast , the Chinese people are a great people , the American people are a great people .If our two peo-ples are enemies the future of this world we share together is dark indeed .But if we can find commonground to work together , the chance for world peace is immeasur-ably increased .”There is a pleasant rhythm in it .The au-thor of the speech has arranged stressed syllables and un-stressed syllables at regular intervals .This adds phonolog-ical beauty to the speech and makes the speech sound very pleasing to the audience .ConclusionIn summary , public speaking is a variety of language which is used on various occasions .Compared with con-versation and unscripted commentary , the language used in public speaking is more formal and solemn .The sen-tence structure of a public speech is complicated but still easy to understand .A variety of rhetorical devices such as alliteration, assonance , simile , metaphor , rhetorical questions , inversion , parallelism , repetition , antithesis , allusion are employed in public speaking to intensify the effect of a speech .The use of rhetoric devices makes a speech effective and convincing .Full preparation and lit-tle external interference enable the language used in pub-lic speaking to be complete in structure and correct in grammar .The mode of delivering a public speech has both the characteristics of oral English and written Eng-lish .It is because of all these features that public speak-ing recognizes itself as an important variety of the English language .References秦秀白. 2002. 英语语体和文体要略. 上海:上海外语教育出版社.徐有志. 2005.英语文体学教程. 北京:高等教育出版社.董启明. 2008. 新编英语文体学教程. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社.张德禄. 2015. 英语文体学重点问题研究.北京:外语教学与研究出版社.Xu Meihua. Stylistic Analysis of “40-Love” Written by McGough[J].Asian Social Science ,2009(6):118-120Appendix40—Lovemiddle agedcouple playingten niswhen thegame endsand theygo homethe netwill stillbe between them①40—Love middle aged couple playing tenniswhen the game ends and theygo home the netwill stillbe between them②。