财务报表附注披露的分析【外文翻译】
- 格式:doc
- 大小:60.50 KB
- 文档页数:15
财务报表附注英语Financial report notes are additional disclosures that provide detailed information related to the financial statements. These notes are an integral part of any financial statement and provide insight into the financial condition, performance, and cash flow of an organization. The following are some common contents that may be included in financial report notes:1. Accounting Policies: The summary of accounting policies that the organization uses to prepare its financial statements.2. Business Segment Information: A disclosure of revenue, operating profit, and assets by business segment.3. Contingent liabilities: A description of potential liabilities that depend on the occurrence of an uncertain event.4. Depreciation: A detailed breakdown of the methods used to calculate depreciation expense.5. Earnings Per Share (EPS): A calculation of earnings per share for the period.6. Financial Instruments: A comprehensive overview of the financial instruments used in the reporting period, including information on the fair value measurement and the risks involved.7. Goodwill: A detailed valuation of goodwill, along with any impairment charges.8. Inventories: A detailed breakdown of inventory values, including raw materials, work-in-progress, and finished goods.9. Leases: A description of the leased assets and liabilities of the organization.10. Related party transactions: A disclosure of transactions between related parties and the impact on the financial statements.11. Restructuring: A breakdown of the cost associated with restructuring activities, including charges related to employee severance and facility closures.12. Revenue Recognition: A detailed overview of the revenue recognition policies of the organization.Overall, financial report notes provide important context and details to the financial statements that can aid in the interpretation and analysis of the financial health of an organization.。
财务报表附注汉英翻译报告
随着经济全球化进程加速,中国政府鼓励越来越多的中国企业"走出去",寻求国际合作。
在国际合作中,财务报表承担着披露企业经济活动、财务业绩以及经济优势的责任。
因此,好的财务报表翻译尤其重要。
目前,对财务报表的翻译研究主要集中在英汉翻译和词汇翻译两个方面。
本报告基于一份审计报告的汉英翻译实践。
审计报告包括审计意见和财务报表两部分。
翻译实践原文为财务报表附注的部分内容,财务报表附注是财务报表的主要组成部分。
本报告研究了奈达功能对等理论对财务报表翻译的指导作用。
本报告共包括四个部分:第一章介绍了翻译任务以及财务报表;第二章描述了翻译过程,包括译前准备,译中翻译难点以及译后反馈三个部分;第三章首先介绍了功能对等理论和提出翻译过程中所用到的翻译原则;然后通过案例分析,解释了翻译原则及方法的运用;报告最后进行了总结。
研究方法包括举例子和理论解释。
报告希望能为从事财务报表翻译的译者提供一定的参考。
第1篇Executive SummaryThis analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the financial performance of XYZ Corporation over the past fiscal year. By examining the financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, we can gain insights into the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and overall financial health. This report will be presented in both English and Chinese, with key findings and conclusions translated for clarity.I. IntroductionXYZ Corporation, a leading company in the technology industry, has released its financial report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. The report provides a detailed account of the company's financial activities, performance, and position during the period. This analysis will focus on the key financial indicators and ratios, highlighting the company's strengths and weaknesses, and offering recommendations for improvement.II. Financial Statements AnalysisA. Balance SheetThe balance sheet provides a snapshot of the company's financialposition at a specific point in time. The following analysis will focus on the key components of the balance sheet:1. Assets: XYZ Corporation's total assets increased by 15% from the previous fiscal year, driven by a 20% growth in current assets and a 10% increase in non-current assets. This indicates that the company has been successful in expanding its asset base.2. Liabilities: The total liabilities of XYZ Corporation also increased by 12%, with current liabilities growing by 15% and non-currentliabilities by 10%. This suggests that the company has taken on additional debt to finance its growth.3. Equity: The equity of XYZ Corporation increased by 18% over thefiscal year, reflecting the company's profitability and reinvestment in the business.B. Income StatementThe income statement shows the company's revenue, expenses, and net income over a specific period. The following points highlight the key aspects of the income statement:1. Revenue: XYZ Corporation's revenue increased by 20% from the previous fiscal year, driven by strong sales in the technology sector.2. Expenses: The company's expenses increased by 15%, with cost of goods sold (COGS) increasing by 18% and selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) increasing by 12%. This indicates that the company has been able to control its cost of goods sold but has experienced some increases in SG&A expenses.3. Net Income: XYZ Corporation's net income increased by 25% over the fiscal year, reflecting the company's strong operational performance.C. Cash Flow StatementThe cash flow statement provides insights into the company's cashinflows and outflows. The following analysis focuses on the key components of the cash flow statement:1. Operating Cash Flow: XYZ Corporation's operating cash flow increased by 30% over the fiscal year, indicating strong cash-generating capabilities.2. Investing Cash Flow: The company's investing cash flow decreased by 5%, primarily due to lower capital expenditures.3. Financing Cash Flow: Financing cash flow increased by 20%, driven by higher dividends paid to shareholders and an increase in long-term debt.III. Financial Ratios AnalysisA. Liquidity Ratios1. Current Ratio: XYZ Corporation's current ratio increased from 1.5 to 1.8, indicating improved short-term liquidity.2. Quick Ratio: The quick ratio improved from 1.2 to 1.5, suggestingthat the company has a strong ability to meet its short-term obligations.B. Solvency Ratios1. Debt-to-Equity Ratio: The debt-to-equity ratio decreased from 1.2 to 1.0, indicating a more conservative financial structure.2. Interest Coverage Ratio: The interest coverage ratio improved from 5.0 to 6.0, reflecting the company's ability to cover its interest expenses.C. Profitability Ratios1. Gross Profit Margin: The gross profit margin remained stable at 40%, indicating efficient cost management.2. Net Profit Margin: The net profit margin increased from 15% to 20%, reflecting the company's improved profitability.IV. ConclusionXYZ Corporation has demonstrated strong financial performance over the past fiscal year, with significant growth in revenue, net income, and operating cash flow. The company's liquidity and solvency ratios are also healthy, indicating a strong financial position. However, there are areas of concern, such as the increase in SG&A expenses and the need to manage long-term debt.V. Recommendations1. Cost Control: XYZ Corporation should focus on managing SG&A expenses to improve profitability.2. Debt Management: The company should consider strategies to manage long-term debt, such as refinancing or paying down existing debt.3. Investment in Research and Development: Investing in research and development can help the company stay competitive in the technology industry.VI. 中文摘要本报告旨在全面分析XYZ公司过去一个财年的财务表现。
****** CO., LTDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013(All amounts in RMB Yuan)I. Company Profile******* Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") is a limited liability company (Sino-foreign joint venture) jointly invested and established by **** Co., Ltd. and ******* Limited on 24 June 2013. On December 26, 2013, the shareholders have been changed to ***** CO., LTD and ******* LIMITED.Business License of Enterprise Legal Person License No.:Legal Representative:Registered Capital: RMB (Paid-in Capital: RMB )Address:Business Scope: Financing and leasing business; leasing business; purchase of leased property from home and abroad; residue value treatment and maintenance of leased property; consulting and guarantees of lease transaction (articles involved in the industry license management would be dealt in terms of national relevant stipulations) II. Declaration on following Accounting Standard for Business EnterprisesThe financial statements made by the Company are in accordance with the requirements of Accounting Standard for Business Enterprises, which reflects the financial position, financial performance and cash flow of the Company truly and completely.III. Basic of preparation of financial statementsThe Company implements the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises (,Finance and Accounting [2006] No. 3”) issued by the Ministry of Finance on February 15, 2006 and the successive regulations. The Company prepares its financial statements on a going concern basis, and recognizes and measures i ts accounting items in compliance with the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises – Basic Standards and other relevant accounting standards, application guidelines and criteria for interpretation of provisions as well as the significant accounting policies and accounting estimates on the basis of actual transactions and events.IV. The main accounting policies, accounting estimates and changesFiscal yearThe Company adopts the calendar year as its fiscal year from January 1 to December 31.Functional currencyRMB was the functional currency of the Company.Accounting measurement attributeThe Company adopts the accrual basis for accounting treatments and double-entry bookkeeping of borrowing for financial accounting. The historical cost is generally as the measurement attribute, and when accounting elements determined are in line with the requirements of Accounting Standards for Enterprises and can be reliably measured, t he replacement cost, net realizable value and fair value can be used for measurement.Accounting method of foreign currency transactionsThe Company?s foreign currency transactions adopt approximate spot exchange rate of the transaction date to convert into RMB in accordance with systematic and rational method; on the balance sheet date, the foreign currency monetary items use the spot exchange rate of the balance sheet date. All balances of exchange arising from differences between the balance sheet date spot exchange rate and the initial recognition or the former balance sheet date spot exchange rate, except that the exchange gains and losses arising by borrowing foreign currency for the construction or production of assets e ligible for capitalization are transacted i n accordance w ith capitalization principles, are included in profit or loss in this period; the foreign currency non-monetary items measured at historical cost will still be converted with the spot exchange rate of the transaction date.The standard for recognizing cash equivalentWhen making the cash flow statement, cash on hand and deposits readily to be paid will be recognized as cash, and short-term (usually no more than three months), highly liquid and readily convertible to known amounts of cash with insignificant riskof changes in value are recognized as cash equivalent.Financial InstrumentsClassification, recognition and measurement of financial assets- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial assets divides it into the following four categories: financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period, loans and receivables, financial assets available for sale and held-to-maturity investments. Financial assets are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other categories of financial assets are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period refer to the short-term sales financial assets, including financial assets held for trading or financial assets measured at fair value with changes i ncluded in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition by the management. Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are subsequently measured at fair value, and the interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value at the end of this period are recognized in the profit or loss in this period. When it is disposed, the difference between the fair value and the initial recorded amount is recognized as investment income, while adjusting gains from changes in the fair value.--Loans and receivables: the non-derivative financial assets w ithout the price in an active market and with fixed and determinable recovery cost are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent measurement, and gains or losses arising from derecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.-- Financial assets available for sale: including non-derivative financial assets available for sale recognized initially and other non-derivative financial assets except for loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments and trading financial assets. Financial assets available for sale are subsequently measured at fair value, and interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and gains or losses arising from the changes in fair value at the end of this period are recognized directly in owners' equity until the financial asset is derecognized or impaired and then is recognized as the profit or loss in this period.-- Held-to-maturity investments: the non-derivative financial assets with clear intention and ability to hold to maturity by the management of the company, a fixed maturity date and fixed or determinable payments are classified as held-to-maturity investments. Held-to-maturity investments adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent m easurement, a nd gains or losses arising from derecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.Classification, recognition and measurement of financial liabilities- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial liabilities divides it intothe following two categories: financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period and other financial liabilities. Financial liabilities are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profitor loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other financial liabilities are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial liabilities measured a t fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period include the trading financial liabilities and financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition. Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at fair value, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value are recognized in the profit or loss in this period.-- Other financial liabilities: adopting the effective interest method and taking amortized cost for subsequent measurement. The gains or losses arising from derecognition or amortization is included in the profit or loss of this period. Requirements for derecognition of financial liabilitiesFinancial liabilities shall be entirely or partially derecognized if the present obligations derived from them are entirely or partially discharged. Where the Company enters into an agreement with a creditor so as to substitute the current financial liabilities with new ones, and the contract clauses of which are substantially different from those of the current ones, it shall recognize the new financial liabilitiesin place of the current ones. Where substantial revisions are made to some or all of the contract clauses of the current financial liabilities, the Company shall recognize the new financial liabilities after revision of the contract clauses in place of the currentones entirely or partially.Upon entire or partial derecognition of financial liabilities, differences between thecarrying amounts of the derecognized financial liabilities and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered or new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period.Where the Company redeems part of its financial liabilities, it shall allocate the carrying amounts of the entire financial liabilities between the relative fair values ofthe parts that continue to be recognized and the derecognized parts on the redemption date. Differences between the carrying amounts allocated to the derecognized parts and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered and the new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period. Recognition and measurement for transfer of financial assetsIf the Company has transferred nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets t o the transferee, they shall be derecognized. I f it retains nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets, they shall not be derecognized and will be recognized as a financial liability. If the Company has not transferred nor retained nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets:(1) to give up the control of the financial assets to be derecognized; (2) not giving up control of the financial asset to be recognized based on the extent of its continuing involvement in the transferred financial assets and liabilities are recognized accordingly.If the transfer of entire financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, differences between the amounts of the following two items shall be recognized in profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amount of the transferred financial asset; (2) the aggregate consideration received from the transfer plus the cumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values originally recognized in the owners? equity. If the partial transfer of financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, the carrying amounts of the entire financial assets transferred shall be split into the derecognized and recognized parts according to their respective fair values and differences between the amounts of the following two items are charged to profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amounts of the derecognized parts;(2) The aggregate consideration for the derecognized parts plus the portion of the accumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values of the derecognized parts which are originally recognized in the owners? equity.Determination of the fair value of financial instruments- If financial instruments trade in an active market, the quoted price in an active market determines its fair value; if financial instrument trade not in an active market, the valuation techniques determine the fair value. Valuation techniques include recent market transaction price reference to the familiar situation and volunteer transaction, current fair value reference to other substantially similar financial instruments, discounted cash flow method and option pricing model and so on.Test and Provisions for impairment loss on financial assets--Except trading financial assets, the Company makes assessment o n the carrying values of financial assets at the balance sheet date. If there is evidence that the fair value of specific financial asset has been impaired, provisions for impairment loss is made accordingly.-- Measurement of impairment of financial assets measured at amortized costIf there is objective evidence that the financial asset measured at amortized cost has been impaired, the carrying amount of the financial asset is written down to the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not yet occurred), and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the profit or loss of this period. The Company carries out the impairment test of significant single financial asset separately, carries out the impairment test on insignificant single financial asset from a single or combination of angles, and carries out the impairment test on single asset without objective evidence of impairment along with the financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics to constitute a combination, but does not carry out the impairment test on the provisionfor impairment of financial assets based on the single in the portfolio. In the subsequent period, if there is objective evidence that the value of financial asset has been restored and recognized relevant to the objective matters occurring after the impairment, previously recognized impairment loss shall be reversed and charged into the profit or loss of this period. But the book value after the reversal should not exceed the amortized cost at the reversal date of the financial assets supposed no provision for impairment. When the financial assets measured at amortized cost actually occur loss, offset against the related provision for impairment.--Available for sale financial assetsIf there is objective evidence that an impairment of available for sale financial assets occurs, even though the financial asset has not been derecognised, the cumulative loss of decrease o f the faire value originally recorded in the owner's equity should be transferred out and charged into the current profit and loss. The cumulative loss is the initial acquisition cost of available for sale financial assets, deducting the fair value of the withdrawing principal and amortization amount and impairment loss as well as net impairment amount originally charged into the profit or loss.Recognition and provision for bad debts of accounts receivableIf there is objective evidence that receivables are impaired at the end of this period,the carrying value will be written down to its present value of estimated future cash flows, and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the current profit or loss. Present value of estimated future cash flows is determined through future cash flows (excluding credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the original effective interest rate, taking into account the value of related collateral (less estimated disposal costs, etc.). Original effective interest rate is the actual interest rate when the receivables are recognized initially. The estimated future cash flows of short-term receivables have small difference from the present value, and the estimated future cash flows are not discounted in determining the related impairment loss.The significant single receivables are separately carried out impairment test at the end of this period, and if there is objective evidence that the impairment has occurred, based on the difference of the present value of future cash flows less than the book value, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision of bad debts is done. The significant single amount refers to top five receivable balances or the sum ofpayments accounting for more than 10% of receivable balances.If there is objective evidence that the individual non-significant receivables impairment has occurred, separate impairment test is done, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision for bad debts is done; other individual non-significant receivables and receivables not impaired after separate test are together divided into several combinations for impairment testing with aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, to determine the impairment loss and do provision for bad debts.In addition to separate provision for impairment of receivables, the company is based on the actual loss rate of receivable portfolio with the same or similar to the previous year and aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, and combines the current situation to determine the ratio of provision for bad debts as follows:Aging Ratio of provisionWithin one year 5%1 –2 years 20%2 –3 years 50%Over 3 years 80%Fixed assets and depreciation accounting methodRecognition criteria of fixed assets: fixed assets refer to tangible assets held for the purpose of producing commodities, providing services, renting or business management with useful lives exceeding one accounting year and high unit value. Classification of fixed assets: buildings and constructions, machinery equipment, transport equipment and office equipment.Fixed assets pricing and depreciation method: the fixed assets is priced based on actual cost and depreciated in a straight-line method. The estimated useful lives, estimated residual rate and annual depreciation rate of various categories of fixed assets are listed as follows:Category of fixed assets Estimateduseful lives(year)Estimated residualrate (year)Annualdepreciation rate(%)Buildings andconstructions20 10 4.5machinery equipment 10 5 9.5transport equipment 5 5 19office equipment 5 5 19Impairment of fixed assets: the Company checks the fixed assets term by term at the end of the reporting period, and if the market continuing to fall or technological obsolescence, damage, long-term idle and other reasons result in fixed assets recoverable amount lower than its book value, in accordance with the difference provision for impairment of fixed assets, the impairment loss is recognized in fixed assets a nd can not be reversed in a subsequent a ccounting period. The recoverable amount is recognized based on the fair value of the assets deducting the net amount after disposal expenses a nd the present value of cash flows of the estimated future assets. The present value of the future cash flows of the asset is determined in accordance with the resulting estimated future cash flows in the process of continuoususe and final disposal to select its appropriate discount rate and the amount of the discount.Accounting method of construction in progressThe construction in progress is priced on the actual cost, to temporarily transfer to fixed assets when reaching the intended use state in accordance with the project budget and the actual cost of the project, and to adjust the book value of fixed assets according to the actual cost after handling final settlement of accounts. Acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or the interest on general borrowing costs and auxiliary expenses of specific borrowings occurred can be included in the cost of capital assets and subsequently recognized in the current profit or loss before the acquisition, construction or production of the qualifying asset reaches the intended use state or the sale state.Impairment of construction in progress: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection of construction in progress at the end of the reporting period; if the construction in process is stopped for long time and will not be constructed in the next three years and the construction in progress brings great uncertainty to the economic benefits of enterprises due to backward performance or techniques and the construction in progress occurs impairment, the balance of recoverable amount of single construction in progress lower than the book value of construction in progressis for impairment provisions of construction in progress. Impairment loss on the construction in progress shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.The pricing and amortizing of intangible assetsPricing of the intangible assets---The cost of outsourcing intangible assets shall be priced based on the actual expenditure directly attributable to intangible assets for the expected purpose.--- Expenditure on internal research and development projects is charged into the current profit or loss, and expense in the development stage can be recognized as intangible costs if meeting the criteria for capitalization.--- Intangible assets of investment is in accordance with the agreed value of the investment contract or agreement as costs, excluding not fair agreed value of the contract or agreement.--- Intangible assets of the debtor obtained in the non-cash asset cover debt method can be accepted; if the receivable creditor?s right is changed into intangible assets, then record according to the fair value of intangible assets.--- For non-monetary transaction intangible assets, t he fair value and related taxes payable of non-monetary assets should be the accounting cost.Amortization of intangible assets: as for the intangible assets with limited service life, it is amortized by straight-line method when it is available for use within the service period. As for unforeseeable period of intangible assets bringing future economic benefits to the company, it is regarded as intangible assets with uncertain service life, and intangible assets with uncertain service life can not be amortized. The Company?s intangible assets include land use rights, forest land use rights and the production and marketing information management software. The land use rights are amortizedaveragely in accordance with 50 years of service life, forest land use rights are amortized averagely in accordance with 30 years of service life, and the production and marketing information management software are amortized averagely in accordance with 5 years of service life.Expenditures arising from development phase on internal research and development projects can be recognized as intangible assets w hen satisfying all of the following conditions: (1) there is technical feasibility of completing the intangible assets so that they will be available for use or sale; (2) there is intention to complete and use or sell the intangible assets; (3) the method that the intangible assets g enerate economic benefits, including existence of a market for products produced by the intangible assets or for the intangible assets themselves, shall be proved. Or, if to be used internally, the usefulness of the intangible assets shall be proved; (4) adequate technical, financial, and other resources are available to complete the development of intangible assets, and the Company has the ability to use or sell the intangible assets;(5) the expenditures arising from development phase of the intangible assets can be measured reliably.Impairment of intangible assets: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection on intangible assets a t the end of the reporting period. If the intangible assets h ave been replaced by other new technologies so as to seriously affect its capacity to create economic benefits for the enterprise, the market value of certain intangible assets sharply fall and is not expected to recover in the remaining amortization period, certain intangible asset has exceeded the legal time limit but still has some value in use as well as the intangible asset impairment has occurred, the provision for impairment is done according to the difference between the individual estimated recoverable amount and the book value. Impairment loss on the intangible asset shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.Accounting method of capitalization of borrowing costsBorrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization should be charged into the relevant costs of assets and therefore should be capitalized. Borrowing costs incurred after qualifying assets for capitalization reaches the estimated use state are charged to profit or loss in the current period. Other borrowing costs are recognized as expenses based on the accrual and are charged to profit or loss in the current period.Capitalization of borrowing costs should meet the following conditions: expenditures are being incurred, which comprise disbursements incurred in the form of paymentsof cash, transfer of non-monetary assets o r assumption of interest-bearing debts for the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization; borrowing costs are being incurred; purchase, construction or manufacturing activities that are necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use or sale are in progress. Capitalization amount of borrowing interest: the borrowing interest incurred from the acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or generally should be determined the capitalization amount according to the following method before the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset reaching its intended use or sale state:---Where funds are borrowed specifically for purchase, construction or manufacturingof assets eligible for capitalization, costs eligible for capitalization are the actual interest costs incurred in current period less the interest income of unused borrowing funds deposited in the bank or any income earned on the temporary investment of such borrowings.---Where funds allocated for purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization are part of a general pool, the eligible capitalization interest amounts are determined by multiplying a capitalization rate of general borrowing bythe weighted average of accumulated capital expenditures over those on specific borrowings. The capitalization rate will be determined based on the weighted average rate of the borrowing costs applicable to the general pool.Suspension for capitalization: Capitalization of borrowing costs should be suspended during periods in which purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization is interrupted abnormally with the interruption time exceeding three months continuously. Borrowing costs incurred during the interruption should be charged to profit or loss for the current period, and should continue to be capitalized when purchase, construction or manufacturing of the relevant assets resumes. If the interruption is the necessary procedure to prepare the assets purchased, constructed or manufactured eligible for capitalization for their intended use or sale, the borrowing costs should continue to be capitalized.Recognition criteria and measurement method of estimated liabilities Recognition criteria of estimated liabilities: when the external security, pending litigation or arbitration, product quality assurance, layoffs, loss of contracts, restructuring obligations, fixed asset retirement obligations and other pertinent business meet the following conditions, it can be recognized as the liability: (1) the obligation is a present obligation of the Company; (2)it is probable that settlement of such an obligation will result in the economic benefit to flow out from the Company; (3) the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably.Measurement method of estimated liabilities: The Company?s estimated liabilities shall be initially measured at the best estimates of the necessary expenditures for the fulfillment of the present obligations. To determine the best estimates, the Company shall take into full account the risks, uncertainties, time value of money, and other factors relating to the contingencies. If the time value of money is significant, the best estimates shall be determined after discounting the relevant future cash outflows. If there is a continuous range for the necessary expenses, and probabilities of occurrence of all the outcomes within this range are equal, the best estimate shall be determinedat the average amount within the range. The best estimates shall be determined as follows in other circumstances: (1) if the contingency involves a single item, the best estimate shall be determined at the most likely outcome; (2) if the contingency involves two or more items, the best estimate should be determined according to allthe possible outcomes with their relevant probabilities; (3) when all or part of the expenses necessary f or the settlement of estimated liabilities of the Company are expected to be compensated by a third parties, the compensations should be separately recognized as assets only when it is virtually certain that the compensations will be。
《国际会计准则指南》英文词汇本词汇表涵盖了国际会计准则委员会的词汇表,经许可包括在其中。
同时也包括在其他会计文献中出现的会计术语。
读者应注意:如果要求给出某一术语的准确定义,特别是当上下文可能影响对特定词汇的理解,应阅读特定准则。
译文中的黑体字表明该术语已在本词汇表中其他地方给已定义。
Absorption costing摊配成本计算法:是一种在存货的成本中包括一定比例的变动成本和固定成本的计算方法。
固定成本的分摊以正常营运能力为基础。
Accounting concepts会计概念指企业编制财务报表(Financial Statement)所依据的基本假设。
Accounting income会计收益指损益表中所列示的某一会计期间的总收益(Income)或亏损(Loss),包括非常项目(Extraordinary),但未扣除所得税费用或加上所得税节省。
Accounting method会计方法见会计程序(Accounting Procedure)。
Accounting policies会计政策指企业编制财务报表(Financial Statement)时所采用的特定原则、基础、惯例、规则和做法。
Accounting principles会计原则是关于经济信息的计量、分类和说明以及通过财务报表(Financial Statement)传递企业财务成果时的指导原则。
Accounting procedures会计程序企业应用会计原则(Accounting Principle)时所采用的方法。
Accounting profit会计利润某一会计期间未扣减所得税之前的净收益或净亏损。
Accounting standards会计准则经准则制定机构正式确认的会计原则(Accounting Principle)。
Accounts payable应付帐款指因购买商品或接受劳务而应支付给其他企业的货币性负债(Liability)。
本科毕业论文(设计)外文翻译外文题目 The value-relevance of financial statementrecognition versus note disclosure: evidencefrom goodwill accounting外文出处European Accounting Review,2009(1) :123-140 外文作者Al Jifri, khaled Citron, David原文:The Value-Relevance of Financial Statement Recognition Versus NoteDisclosure: Evidence From Goodwill AccountingABSTRACT The relative significance of financial statement recognition andnote disclosure is an important issue for accounting regulators, preparers and auditors.While standard-setters priorities financial recognition over disclosure, the empiricalevidence on the value-relevance of note disclosures is mixed. This is partly due to thesevere methodological problems inherent in comparing the two modes of presentation.This paper examines this issue in a new context by exploiting the UK regulatoryenvironment where old pre-FRS 10 goodwill continues to be disclosed in the notesto the accounts at the same time as new post-FRS 10 goodwill is capitalized. It thususes a within-firm research method to examine the relative significance of the twogoodwill amounts. The analysis is based on a sample of 243 non-financial firmscontaining amounts of both recognized and disclosed goodwill in their 2002 financialstatements. Both variables are significantly associated with share price. In addition,for firms engaging in R&D, there is no significant difference between thecontributions of disclosed and recognized goodwill in explaining market value, aresult consistent with the markets efficiently incorporating goodwill informationirrespective of where it appears in the annual report.This paper examines whether the market values goodwill disclosed only in the notes to the accounts equivalently to goodwill recognized in the balance sheet. It exploits the unique UK regulatory framework in which accounting for goodwill moved from note disclosure to balance sheet recognition. This context enables the study to contribute to the recognition vs. disclosure debate without encountering the self-selection bias introduced when firms have a choice about the reporting method or the influence of contemporaneous events if recognized and disclosed amounts are observed at different points in time.This issue is important for a number of reasons. Firstly, the question as to whether share prices reflect amounts disclosed in the notes and those recognized in the financial statements similarly, as would be expected in efficient markets, is of interest to regulators, accounts preparers and auditors. In this connection, regulators appear to priorities recognition over disclosure. Thus the UK Accounting Standards Board’s conceptual framework favors recognition when it states:” ... disclosure of information in the notes is not a substitute for recognition and does not correct or justify any misrepresentation in or omission from the primary financial statements’(ASB,1999,para.7.5).Si milarly, in its conceptual framework the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board)states that note disclosure is not a substitute for financial statement recognition (Alfredson et al. , 2005);and in the USA the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board)has argued, in the context of accounting for post-retirement benefits, that disclosure is not a substitute for recognition (SFAS No.106,para.164,cited by Davis-Friday etal. , 1999). On the other hand, as Schipper (2007) points out, these comments in t he regulators’ conceptual framework documents neither set out the conceptual role of mandatory disclosures nor do they provide clear guidance as to the fundamental distinction between disclosure and recognition. Efficient markets theory does suggest that the markets adopt a substance over form approach and incorporate all publicly available information, irrespective of the mode of disclosure. However, there are conditions under which note disclosures are less strongly associated with market values (Bernard and Schipper, 1994; Davis-Friday et al., 1999; Ahmed et al., 2006). One of these is ifinvestors inappropriately undervalue disclosed amounts either through lack of expertise or due to the cost of processing note information. Secondly, recognition may imply greater relevance or reliability, in which case users correctly assign lower weight to disclosed amounts. For example, auditors or management may require more stringent standards for recognized values. In the absence of a clear theory relating to disclosures, this paper seeks to provide empirical evidence as to whether these two modes of reporting have a differential effect on share prices.Secondly, goodwill accounting is itself a controversial issue, with standard setters changing required accounting methods on a regular basis. Many studies have investigated the value-relevance of recognized goodwill amounts (for example, McCarthy and Schneider, 1995; Barth and Clinch, 1996; Jennings et al., 1996; Godfrey and Koh, 2001). More recently the introduction of SFAS 142 (FASB, 2001) in the USA has triggered research into whether the new standard has improved the reliability of recognized goodwill amounts. Results are mixed with Ahmed and Guler (2007) finding that it has while Chambers (2007) has contrary results. Other studies (e.g. Beatty and Weber, 2006; Guler, 2007) find that management incentives and corporate governance structures affect the recognition of impairment charges under SFAS 142. While these studies have focused on the value-relevance of goodwill recognized on the face of the financial statements, this paper investigates whether accounting for goodwill via note disclosure vs. financial statement recognition affects investors’ decisions, a feature of goodwill accounting not examined hitherto.The paper addresses some key methodological problems inherent in researching this issue. It examines the differential market valuation of goodwill in the notes vs. that in the balance sheet in a context in which firms, firstly, had no choice about the method of reporting, thus eliminating the self-selection problem; secondly, in which both sets of amounts are reported at the same time so that differences in contemporaneous disclosures do not distort the results; and thirdly, by addressing, if only partially, potential differential reliability of disclosed and recognized amounts。
****** CO., LTDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013(All amounts in RMB Yuan) I. Company Profile******* Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") is a limited liability company (Sino-foreign joint venture) jointly invested and established by **** Co., Ltd. and ******* Limited on 24 June 2013. On December 26, 2013, the shareholders have been changed to ***** CO., LTD and ******* LIMITED.Business License of Enterprise Legal Person License No.:Legal Representative:Registered Capital: RMB (Paid-in Capital: RMB )Address:Business Scope: Financing and leasing business; leasing business; purchase of leased property from home and abroad; residue value treatment and maintenance of leased property; consulting and guarantees of lease transaction (articles involved in the industry license management would be dealt in terms of national relevant stipulations) II. Declaration on following Accounting Standard for Business EnterprisesThe financial statements made by the Company are in accordance with the requirements of Accounting Standard for Business Enterprises, which reflects the financial position, financial performance and cash flow of the Company truly and completely.III. Basic of preparation of financial statementsThe Company implements the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises(‘Finance and Accounting [2006] No. 3”) issued by the Ministry of Finance on February 15, 2006 and the successive regulations. The Company prepares its financial statements on a going concern basis, and recognizes and measures its accounting items in compliance with the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises – Basic Standards and other relevant accounting standards, application guidelines and criteria for interpretation of provisions as well as the significant accounting policies and accounting estimates on the basis of actual transactions and events.IV. The main accounting policies, accounting estimates and changesFiscal yearThe Company adopts the calendar year as its fiscal year from January 1 to December 31.Functional currencyRMB was the functional currency of the Company.Accounting measurement attributeThe Company adopts the accrual basis for accounting treatments and double-entry bookkeeping of borrowing for financial accounting. The historical cost is generally as the measurement attribute, and when accounting elements determined are in line with the requirements of Accounting Standards for Enterprises and can be reliablymeasured, the replacement cost, net realizable value and fair value can be used for measurement.Accounting method of foreign currency transactionsThe Company’s fo reign currency transactions adopt approximate spot exchange rate of the transaction date to convert into RMB in accordance with systematic and rational method; on the balance sheet date, the foreign currency monetary items use the spot exchange rate of the balance sheet date. All balances of exchange arising from differences between the balance sheet date spot exchange rate and the initial recognition or the former balance sheet date spot exchange rate, except that the exchange gains and losses arising by borrowing foreign currency for the construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization are transacted in accordance with capitalization principles, are included in profit or loss in this period; the foreign currency non-monetary items measured at historical cost will still be converted with the spot exchange rate of the transaction date.The standard for recognizing cash equivalentWhen making the cash flow statement, cash on hand and deposits readily to be paid will be recognized as cash, and short-term (usually no more than three months), highly liquid and readily convertible to known amounts of cash with insignificant risk of changes in value are recognized as cash equivalent.Financial InstrumentsClassification, recognition and measurement of financial assets- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial assets divides it into the following four categories: financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period, loans and receivables, financial assets available for sale and held-to-maturity investments. Financial assets are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other categories of financial assets are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period refer to the short-term sales financial assets, including financial assets held for trading or financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition by the management. Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are subsequently measured at fair value, and the interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value at the end of this period are recognized in the profit or loss in this period. When it is disposed, the difference between the fair value and the initial recorded amount is recognized as investment income, while adjusting gains from changes in the fair value.--Loans and receivables: the non-derivative financial assets without the price in an active market and with fixed and determinable recovery cost are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent measurement, and gains or losses arising fromderecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.-- Financial assets available for sale: including non-derivative financial assets available for sale recognized initially and other non-derivative financial assets except for loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments and trading financial assets. Financial assets available for sale are subsequently measured at fair value, and interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and gains or losses arising from the changes in fair value at the end of this period are recognized directly in owners' equity until the financial asset is derecognized or impaired and then is recognized as the profit or loss in this period.-- Held-to-maturity investments: the non-derivative financial assets with clear intention and ability to hold to maturity by the management of the company, a fixed maturity date and fixed or determinable payments are classified as held-to-maturity investments. Held-to-maturity investments adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent measurement, and gains or losses arising from derecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.Classification, recognition and measurement of financial liabilities- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial liabilities divides it into the following two categories: financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period and other financial liabilities. Financial liabilities are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other financial liabilities are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period include the trading financial liabilities and financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition. Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at fair value, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value are recognized in the profit or loss in this period.-- Other financial liabilities: adopting the effective interest method and taking amortized cost for subsequent measurement. The gains or losses arising from derecognition or amortization is included in the profit or loss of this period. Requirements for derecognition of financial liabilitiesFinancial liabilities shall be entirely or partially derecognized if the present obligations derived from them are entirely or partially discharged. Where the Company enters into an agreement with a creditor so as to substitute the current financial liabilities with new ones, and the contract clauses of which are substantially different from those of the current ones, it shall recognize the new financial liabilities in place of the current ones. Where substantial revisions are made to some or all of the contract clauses of the current financial liabilities, the Company shall recognize thenew financial liabilities after revision of the contract clauses in place of the current ones entirely or partially.Upon entire or partial derecognition of financial liabilities, differences between the carrying amounts of the derecognized financial liabilities and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered or new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period.Where the Company redeems part of its financial liabilities, it shall allocate the carrying amounts of the entire financial liabilities between the relative fair values of the parts that continue to be recognized and the derecognized parts on the redemption date. Differences between the carrying amounts allocated to the derecognized parts and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered and the new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period. Recognition and measurement for transfer of financial assetsIf the Company has transferred nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets to the transferee, they shall be derecognized. If it retains nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets, they shall not be derecognized and will be recognized as a financial liability. If the Company has not transferred nor retained nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets:(1) to give up the control of the financial assets to be derecognized; (2) not giving up control of the financial asset to be recognized based on the extent of its continuing involvement in the transferred financial assets and liabilities are recognized accordingly.If the transfer of entire financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, differences between the amounts of the following two items shall be recognized in profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amount of the transferred financial asset; (2) the aggregate consideration received from the transfer plus the cumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values originally recognized in the owners’ equity. If the partial transfer of financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, the carrying amounts of the entire financial assets transferred shall be split into the derecognized and recognized parts according to their respective fair values and differences between the amounts of the following two items are charged to profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amounts of the derecognized parts;(2) The aggregate consideration for the derecognized parts plus the portion of the accumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values of the derecognized parts which are originally recognized in the owners’ equity.Determination of the fair value of financial instruments- If financial instruments trade in an active market, the quoted price in an active market determines its fair value; if financial instrument trade not in an active market, the valuation techniques determine the fair value. Valuation techniques include recent market transaction price reference to the familiar situation and volunteer transaction, current fair value reference to other substantially similar financial instruments, discounted cash flow method and option pricing model and so on.Test and Provisions for impairment loss on financial assets--Except trading financial assets, the Company makes assessment on the carrying values of financial assets at the balance sheet date. If there is evidence that the fair value of specific financial asset has been impaired, provisions for impairment loss is made accordingly.-- Measurement of impairment of financial assets measured at amortized costIf there is objective evidence that the financial asset measured at amortized cost has been impaired, the carrying amount of the financial asset is written down to the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not yet occurred), and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the profit or loss of this period. The Company carries out the impairment test of significant single financial asset separately, carries out the impairment test on insignificant single financial asset from a single or combination of angles, and carries out the impairment test on single asset without objective evidence of impairment along with the financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics to constitute a combination, but does not carry out the impairment test on the provision for impairment of financial assets based on the single in the portfolio. In the subsequent period, if there is objective evidence that the value of financial asset has been restored and recognized relevant to the objective matters occurring after the impairment, previously recognized impairment loss shall be reversed and charged into the profit or loss of this period. But the book value after the reversal should not exceed the amortized cost at the reversal date of the financial assets supposed no provision for impairment. When the financial assets measured at amortized cost actually occur loss, offset against the related provision for impairment.--Available for sale financial assetsIf there is objective evidence that an impairment of available for sale financial assets occurs, even though the financial asset has not been derecognised, the cumulative loss of decrease of the faire value originally recorded in the owner's equity should be transferred out and charged into the current profit and loss. The cumulative loss is the initial acquisition cost of available for sale financial assets, deducting the fair value of the withdrawing principal and amortization amount and impairment loss as well as net impairment amount originally charged into the profit or loss.Recognition and provision for bad debts of accounts receivableIf there is objective evidence that receivables are impaired at the end of this period, the carrying value will be written down to its present value of estimated future cash flows, and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the current profit or loss. Present value of estimated future cash flows is determined through future cash flows (excluding credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the original effective interest rate, taking into account the value of related collateral (less estimated disposal costs, etc.). Original effective interest rate is the actual interest rate when the receivables are recognized initially. The estimated future cash flows of short-term receivables have small difference from the present value, and the estimated future cash flows are not discounted in determining the related impairment loss.The significant single receivables are separately carried out impairment test at the end of this period, and if there is objective evidence that the impairment has occurred, based on the difference of the present value of future cash flows less than the book value, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision of bad debts is done. The significant single amount refers to top five receivable balances or the sum of payments accounting for more than 10% of receivable balances.If there is objective evidence that the individual non-significant receivables impairment has occurred, separate impairment test is done, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision for bad debts is done; other individual non-significant receivables and receivables not impaired after separate test are together divided into several combinations for impairment testing with aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, to determine the impairment loss and do provision for bad debts.In addition to separate provision for impairment of receivables, the company is based on the actual loss rate of receivable portfolio with the same or similar to the previous year and aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, and combines the currentFixed assets and depreciation accounting methodRecognition criteria of fixed assets: fixed assets refer to tangible assets held for the purpose of producing commodities, providing services, renting or business management with useful lives exceeding one accounting year and high unit value. Classification of fixed assets: buildings and constructions, machinery equipment, transport equipment and office equipment.Fixed assets pricing and depreciation method: the fixed assets is priced based on actual cost and depreciated in a straight-line method. The estimated useful lives, estimated residual rate and annual depreciation rate of various categories of fixedend of the reporting period, and if the market continuing to fall or technological obsolescence, damage, long-term idle and other reasons result in fixed assets recoverable amount lower than its book value, in accordance with the difference provision for impairment of fixed assets, the impairment loss is recognized in fixedassets and can not be reversed in a subsequent accounting period. The recoverable amount is recognized based on the fair value of the assets deducting the net amount after disposal expenses and the present value of cash flows of the estimated future assets. The present value of the future cash flows of the asset is determined in accordance with the resulting estimated future cash flows in the process of continuous use and final disposal to select its appropriate discount rate and the amount of the discount.Accounting method of construction in progressThe construction in progress is priced on the actual cost, to temporarily transfer to fixed assets when reaching the intended use state in accordance with the project budget and the actual cost of the project, and to adjust the book value of fixed assets according to the actual cost after handling final settlement of accounts. Acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or the interest on general borrowing costs and auxiliary expenses of specific borrowings occurred can be included in the cost of capital assets and subsequently recognized in the current profit or loss before the acquisition, construction or production of the qualifying asset reaches the intended use state or the sale state.Impairment of construction in progress: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection of construction in progress at the end of the reporting period; if the construction in process is stopped for long time and will not be constructed in the next three years and the construction in progress brings great uncertainty to the economic benefits of enterprises due to backward performance or techniques and the construction in progress occurs impairment, the balance of recoverable amount of single construction in progress lower than the book value of construction in progress is for impairment provisions of construction in progress. Impairment loss on the construction in progress shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.The pricing and amortizing of intangible assetsPricing of the intangible assets---The cost of outsourcing intangible assets shall be priced based on the actual expenditure directly attributable to intangible assets for the expected purpose.--- Expenditure on internal research and development projects is charged into the current profit or loss, and expense in the development stage can be recognized as intangible costs if meeting the criteria for capitalization.--- Intangible assets of investment is in accordance with the agreed value of the investment contract or agreement as costs, excluding not fair agreed value of the contract or agreement.--- Intangible assets of the debtor obtained in the non-cash asset cover debt method can be accepted; if the receivable creditor’s right is changed into intangible assets, then record according to the fair value of intangible assets.--- For non-monetary transaction intangible assets, the fair value and related taxes payable of non-monetary assets should be the accounting cost.Amortization of intangible assets: as for the intangible assets with limited service life, it is amortized by straight-line method when it is available for use within the serviceperiod. As for unforeseeable period of intangible assets bringing future economic benefits to the company, it is regarded as intangible assets with uncertain service life, and intangible assets with uncertain service life can not be amortized. The Company’s intangible assets include land use rights, forest land use rights and the production and marketing information management software. The land use rights are amortized averagely in accordance with 50 years of service life, forest land use rights are amortized averagely in accordance with 30 years of service life, and the production and marketing information management software are amortized averagely in accordance with 5 years of service life.Expenditures arising from development phase on internal research and development projects can be recognized as intangible assets when satisfying all of the following conditions: (1) there is technical feasibility of completing the intangible assets so that they will be available for use or sale; (2) there is intention to complete and use or sell the intangible assets; (3) the method that the intangible assets generate economic benefits, including existence of a market for products produced by the intangible assets or for the intangible assets themselves, shall be proved. Or, if to be used internally, the usefulness of the intangible assets shall be proved; (4) adequate technical, financial, and other resources are available to complete the development of intangible assets, and the Company has the ability to use or sell the intangible assets;(5) the expenditures arising from development phase of the intangible assets can be measured reliably.Impairment of intangible assets: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection on intangible assets at the end of the reporting period. If the intangible assets have been replaced by other new technologies so as to seriously affect its capacity to create economic benefits for the enterprise, the market value of certain intangible assets sharply fall and is not expected to recover in the remaining amortization period, certain intangible asset has exceeded the legal time limit but still has some value in use as well as the intangible asset impairment has occurred, the provision for impairment is done according to the difference between the individual estimated recoverable amount and the book value. Impairment loss on the intangible asset shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.Accounting method of capitalization of borrowing costsBorrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization should be charged into the relevant costs of assets and therefore should be capitalized. Borrowing costs incurred after qualifying assets for capitalization reaches the estimated use state are charged to profit or loss in the current period. Other borrowing costs are recognized as expenses based on the accrual and are charged to profit or loss in the current period.Capitalization of borrowing costs should meet the following conditions: expenditures are being incurred, which comprise disbursements incurred in the form of payments of cash, transfer of non-monetary assets or assumption of interest-bearing debts for the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization; borrowing costs are being incurred; purchase, construction or manufacturing activities that are necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use or sale are in progress.Capitalization amount of borrowing interest: the borrowing interest incurred from the acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or generally should be determined the capitalization amount according to the following method before the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset reaching its intended use or sale state:---Where funds are borrowed specifically for purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization, costs eligible for capitalization are the actual interest costs incurred in current period less the interest income of unused borrowing funds deposited in the bank or any income earned on the temporary investment of such borrowings.---Where funds allocated for purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization are part of a general pool, the eligible capitalization interest amounts are determined by multiplying a capitalization rate of general borrowing by the weighted average of accumulated capital expenditures over those on specific borrowings. The capitalization rate will be determined based on the weighted average rate of the borrowing costs applicable to the general pool.Suspension for capitalization: Capitalization of borrowing costs should be suspended during periods in which purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization is interrupted abnormally with the interruption time exceeding three months continuously. Borrowing costs incurred during the interruption should be charged to profit or loss for the current period, and should continue to be capitalized when purchase, construction or manufacturing of the relevant assets resumes. If the interruption is the necessary procedure to prepare the assets purchased, constructed or manufactured eligible for capitalization for their intended use or sale, the borrowing costs should continue to be capitalized.Recognition criteria and measurement method of estimated liabilities Recognition criteria of estimated liabilities: when the external security, pending litigation or arbitration, product quality assurance, layoffs, loss of contracts, restructuring obligations, fixed asset retirement obligations and other pertinent business meet the following conditions, it can be recognized as the liability: (1) the obligation is a present obligation of the Company; (2)it is probable that settlement of such an obligation will result in the economic benefit to flow out from the Company;(3) the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably.Measurement method of estimated liabilities: The Company’s estimated liabilities shall be initially measured at the best estimates of the necessary expenditures for the fulfillment of the present obligations. To determine the best estimates, the Company shall take into full account the risks, uncertainties, time value of money, and other factors relating to the contingencies. If the time value of money is significant, the best estimates shall be determined after discounting the relevant future cash outflows. If there is a continuous range for the necessary expenses, and probabilities of occurrence of all the outcomes within this range are equal, the best estimate shall be determined at the average amount within the range. The best estimates shall be determined as follows in other circumstances: (1) if the contingency involves a single item, the best estimate shall be determined at the most likely outcome; (2) if the contingency。
财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献编辑Introduction:Financial statement analysis is an essential tool used by businesses and investors to evaluate the financial performance and position of a company. It involves the examination of financial statements such as the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement to assess the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. In this document, we will provide a detailed analysis and translation of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis.1. Importance of Financial Statement Analysis:Financial statement analysis provides valuable insights into a company's financial health and helps stakeholders make informed decisions. It enables investors to assess the profitability and growth potential of a company before making investment decisions. Additionally, it helps creditors evaluate the creditworthiness and repayment capacity of a company before extending credit. Furthermore, financial statement analysis assists management in identifying areas of improvement and making strategic decisions to enhance the company's performance.2. Key Elements of Financial Statement Analysis:a) Balance Sheet Analysis:The balance sheet provides a snapshot of a company's financial position at a specific point in time. It presents the company's assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity. By analyzing the balance sheet, stakeholders can assess the company's liquidity, solvency, and financial stability.b) Income Statement Analysis:The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, presents the company's revenues, expenses, and net income over a specific period. It helps stakeholders evaluate the company's profitability, revenue growth, and cost management.c) Cash Flow Statement Analysis:The cash flow statement details the inflows and outflows of cash during a specific period. It provides insights into the company's operating, investing, and financing activities. By analyzing the cash flow statement, stakeholders can assess the company's ability to generate cash, meet its financial obligations, and fund its growth.3. Financial Ratios for Analysis:Financial ratios are essential tools used in financial statement analysis to assess a company's performance and compare it with industry benchmarks. Some commonly used financial ratios include:a) Liquidity Ratios:- Current Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations.- Quick Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory.b) Solvency Ratios:- Debt-to-Equity Ratio: Measures the proportion of debt to equity in a company's capital structure.- Interest Coverage Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet interest payments on its debt.c) Profitability Ratios:- Gross Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company's core operations.- Net Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company after all expenses, including taxes.d) Efficiency Ratios:- Inventory Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company sells its inventory.- Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company collects cash from its customers.4. Translation of Foreign Literature:In this section, we will provide a translation of key points from foreign literature related to financial statement analysis. The literature emphasizes the importance of accurate financial reporting, the use of financial ratios for analysis, and the interpretation of financial statements to make informed decisions.Conclusion:Financial statement analysis is a crucial process for evaluating a company's financial performance and position. It provides valuable insights into a company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. By analyzing financial statements and using financial ratios, stakeholders can make informed decisions regarding investments, credit extension, and strategic planning. Accurate translation and understanding of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis can further enhance the effectiveness of this process.。
财务报表分析外文文献及翻译LNTU---Acc附录A财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值比率摘要关键词:财政杠杆;运营债务杠杆;股本回报率;值比率传统观点认为,杠杆效应是从金融活动中产生的:公司通过借贷来增加运营的资金。
杠杆作用的衡量标准是负债总额与股东权益。
然而,一些负债——如银行贷款和发行的债券,是由于资金筹措,其他一些负债——如贸易应付账款,预收收入和退休金负债,是由于在运营过程中与供应商的贸易,与顾客和雇佣者在结算过程中产生的负债。
融资负债通常交易运作良好的资本市场其中的发行者是随行就市的商人。
与此相反,在运营中公司能够实现高增值。
因为业务涉及的是与资本市场相比,不太完善的贸易的输入和输出的市场。
因此,考虑到股票估值,运营负债和融资负债的区别的产生有一些先验的原因。
我们研究在资产负债表上,运营负债中的一美元是否与融资中的一美元等值这个问题。
因为运营负债和融资负债是股票价值的组成部分,这个问题就相当于问是否股价与账面价值比率是否取决于账面净值的组成。
价格与账面比率是由预期回报率的账面价值决定的。
所以,如果部分的账面价值要求不同的溢价,他们必须显示出不同的账面价值的预期回报率。
因此,标准的财务报表分析的能够区分股东从运营中和借贷的融资业务中产生的利润。
因此,资产回报有别于股本回报率,这种差异是由于杠杆作用。
然而,在标准的分析中,经营负债不区别于融资负债。
因此,为了制定用于实证分析的规范,我们的研究结果是用于愿意分析预期公司的收益和账面收益率。
这些预测和估值依赖于负债的组成。
这篇文章结构如下。
第一部分概述并指出了了能够判别两种杠杆作用类型,连接杠杆作用和盈利的财务报表分析第二节将杠杆作用,股票价值和价格与账面比率联系在一起。
第三节中进行实证分析,第四节进行了概述与结论。
1 杠杆作用的财务报表分析以下财务报表分析将融资债务和运营债务对股东权益的影响区别开。
这个分析从实证的详细分析中得出了精确的杠杆效应等式普通股产权资本收益率=综合所得?普通股本(1) 杠杆影响到这个盈利等式的分子和分母。
会计信息披露外文文献翻译文献出处:Ebimobowei A. A Study of Social Accounting Disclosures in the Annual Reports of Nigerian Companies [J]. Asian Journal of Business Management, 2011, 3(3): 145-151.原文A Study of Social Accounting Disclosures in theAnnual Reports of Nigerian CompaniesAppah EbimoboweiAbstract: Social accounting is concerned with the development of measurement system to monitor social performance. It is rational assessment of and disclosure on some meaningful domain of companies’ activities that have social impact. Thi s study examines the practice of social accounting disclosure in Nigerian companies. Forty companies from eight sectors quoted in the Nigerian Stock Exchange were randomly sampled. Data were collected from the annual reports of the companies’ for the perio d 2005 to 2007 and the level of disclosure is measured using content analysis and descriptive analysis. The paper found that 82.5% of the companies sampled present social accounting information in their annual reports. The results show that Nigerian companies prefer to disclose social accounting information in the Directors Report, Chairman’s Statement and Notes to the Accounts in the form of short qualitative information. Human resources, community involvement and environment were identified as the most popular themes. Hence, the paper recommends among others that companies should take social accounting as a moral duty; legislation for all companies to disclose social accounting information in Nigeria; social indicators to be developed at thenational level in the area of employment opportunities, environmental control, energy conservation, health care etc and professional accounting bodies in the country should collaborate to expand research in social accounting.Key words: Annual reports, social accounting, social disclosure, NigeriaINTRODUCTIONThe increasing need for every organization to disclose in their annual reports the various activities that affect the society is becoming a very fundamental issue all over the world mostly in developed economies, but this is not the case in developing countries like Nigeria. This is because organizations are particularly more interested in the profit maximization objective to the detriment of the society. According to Iyoha (2010), in developing countries, the concern is about how efficient organizations are in terms of how much profits are made and how much dividends are paid. No serious thoughts are given to social issues in the annual reports of organizations such as environmental protection, energy savings, fair business practice, and community involvements etc. Asechemie (1996) stress that the absence of financial data relating to actions and arrangements for social concern in Nigeria is not in accord with the trend in the USA, Europe and Canada where companies are required to report on the effect of compliance with laws governing corporate social conduct on capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position.The objective of this paper is to examine the social accounting disclosures in the annual reports of Nigerian companies. Therefore, the content of annual reports must provide information to users relating to social factors. AsMathews (2002) suggested in his study, documenting and analyzing what is disclosed in the area of social accounting should be one of the feature of corporate social reporting. Hence, this study attempts to answer two main questions: (i) what are the most popular types of social accounting and how is social accounting disclosed in the annual reports of companies in Nigeria and (ii) where is the location of presentation of social accounting in the annual reports of companies in Nigeria. To achieve this objective, the paper is divided into five sections. The next section discusses the theoretical and empirical literatures adopted for the study. Section three examines the methodology of the study; section four examines the findings and discussions while the last section deals with the conclusion and recommendations.Theories on corporate social accounting disclosure behavior:Gray et al. (1995) in Orij (2007) provided a much cited categorization of social accountingdisclosure studies. They talked about three broad classifications of decision usefulness studies, economic theory and social and political theory. The decision usefulness generally relates to the usefulness of accounting information, which is social accounting in this case. These studies are of two types, ranking of information on its perceived decision-usefulness in the financial community and investigations of information on effects on share prices. The economic theory studies are a periphery of agency theory and Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) research. The social and political theory focuses on legitimacy theory (LEGT) and stakeholder theory (STAKT). LEGT and STAKT are theories developed out of political economies. They are overlapping perspectives in a political-economic framework. Intheoretical term, Guthrie and Parker (1990) also analyse their empirical evidence in relation to a socio-political economy theory of social disclosure and suggest that:a political economy theory of social disclosure is both viable and may contribute toward our understanding of observed developments in national reporting practices. Corporate social disclosures have appeared to reflect public social priorities, respond to government pressures, accommodate environmental pressures and sectional interests, and protect corporate prerogatives and projected corporate image.Prior empirical studies: A number of studies have been published on the subject of social accounting disclosure. A number of these rely on content analysis of annual reports. There are several different methods to the analysis of narratives in annual reports. Bettie et al. (2004) distinguish two categories: subjective (analyst ratings) and semi-objective (disclosure index studies, content analysis, readability studies and linguistic analysis). Content analysis has been selected for this study because it has been widely used in the accounting research, particularly in social accounting disclosure studies. Since this is the method of analysis in the present study, we limit our review to these studies. Table 1 summary the methodology, sample and main results of these studies.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONLevel of social accounting disclosure: Table 2 shows that 33 companies (82.5%) from various industry groupings made social accounting disclosures at least for oneyear in their annual reports. Analysis based on industry, showed that chemical and paints, construction and petroleum marketing had 100 percent disclosure of social accountinginformation. The lowest level of social accounting information was 66.7% contributed by Breweries and conglomerate while companies in the building materials (75%), food/beverages and tobacco (80%), and healthcare (83.3%) level of disclosure from year 2005 to 2007. Therefore, it can be deduced that there is a growing concern for companies reporting social performance in their financial statements.Form of social accounting disclosure: Table 3 shows that in 2005 75% of the companies disclose social accounting information using narrative/pictures and 25% disclose with monetary formats. The year 2006 81% used narrative and 19% used monetary format while in 2007 84% used narrative and 16% monetary format. However, there were also companies that used both narrative and monetary formats of disclosure. Many companies were also found to have used the monetary format to disclose human resource information and environmental contribution primarily related to retirement benefit, training and development and some community based projects such as adopting school, scholarships and donations.Location of social accounting disclosure: Table 4 shows that 4(12.12%) of the sampled companies (Appendix) disclose social accounting information in the chairman’s statement; 17(51.52%) disclose social accounting information in the directors report; 2(6.06%) in the statement of accounting policy; 10(30.30%) in the notes to the accounts. The paper discovers that Directors report is the most popular location where social accounting information is disclosed by companies in Nigeria and also the “notes to the accounts”. This result is also consistent with Mamman (2004) study that Directors report is the most preferred location of social accounting information.Quantification of amount of social accounting disclosure:This study used only number of disclosure as the approach of capturing data through content analysis. Almost all companies disclosed social accounting information in short qualitative discussion and some have extended qualitative discussion where they have sections to disclose the social accounting information especially on human resources andcommunity based projects.Trend of social accounting disclosure: Table 5 shows the trend of social accounting disclosures in Nigeria. Twelve (12) companies representing (36.36%) reveals that human resources is the trend of social accounting disclosure in the annual report; two companies representing (6.06%) says the trend is fair business practice; nine (9) companies representing (27.27%) suggests community development; three (3) companies representing (9.09%) reveals that the trend of social accounting is energy; five (5) companies representing (15.16%) in their annual reports disclosed that the trend is on the environment; and two (2) companies representing (6.06%) disclosed in their annual reports that the trends is on the organization’s products. The analysis therefore reveals that disclosure of social and environmental activities is specifically on the discretion of the companies.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONThe study examined social accounting disclosure for a three-year period from 2005 to 2007. The type of social accounting disclosure, form and location were identified in the annual reports of 40 companies. This covers eight sectors of the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The study found that 82.5% of Nigerian Companies disclose one type or the other of social accountinginformation in their annual reports. These disclosures were voluntary in nature and largely qualitative; contrary to the developed and some developing countries. The most favoured places of disclosure are in the Directors Report, Chairman’s Statement and Notes to the account. The most popular theme that most companies disclose is human resources followed by community involvement and environment. Analysis done by industry found that the petroleum marketing, food/beverages and tobacco, chemicals and paints sectors provides a higher percentage of social accounting disclosure in Nigeria. Therefore, on the basis of the conclusion above, the following suggestions are provided by the researcher to improve the social accounting practice in Nigeria:﹒Companies should take social accounting disclosure as their moral duty; mere legislation would not solve the problem.﹒The government should provide some incentives like differentials in tax treatment, subsidies, rebates etc. so that companies can take social programmes.﹒Researchers should provide the basis and means of social accounting quantification as far as possible.﹒The government should put in place suitable legislation for all companies to compel them to make adequate disclosure of their activities to the society.﹒Professional institutes in the country like the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria and the Association of National Accountants of Nigeria should work together for developing social accounting and reporting techniques.﹒Social indicators should be developed at the national level in the areas of employment opportunities, environmental control, energy conservation, health education etc.译文会计信息披露,尼日利亚公司年度报告的实证研究阿帕·艾比莫泊威摘要:会计信息披露关系到对社会绩效监督的评估系统的发展。
财务报表分析外文翻译全集文档(可以直接使用,可编辑实用优质文档,欢迎下载)Accountability in financial reporting: detecting fraudulentfirms在财务报告的责任:检测欺诈性公司“会计研究所和会计学院,玛拉工艺大学,莎阿南,马来西亚雪兰莪州”摘要本文旨在探讨公司欺诈行为与非欺诈行为的财务比率间存在的差别,并确定哪些财务比率是显著的虚假报告。
样本包括在马来西亚公共上市公司的65个欺诈性企业和65个非欺诈性企业,根据2000年和2021年数据的研究发现,有欺诈行为的公司和非舞弊的公司,在总债务与总资产、应收账款销售额方面存在显著的均值差异。
此外,Z分数衡量破产概率是为了检测是否存在财务报告舞弊。
关键词:财务比率;财务报表分析;虚假财务报告;上市公司;马来西亚一、引言根据马来西亚上市公司的要求欺诈的公司被囊定为犯罪认定。
欺诈是在实践中出现的一种欺诈行为,广义的概念具有两种基本类型。
首先是挪用资产,二是财务报告舞弊。
财务报告舞弊通常发生在以财务报表造假的形式来获得一些有益的形式。
有些人认为欺诈涉及财务报表故意的扭曲(硬盘接口技术2021)。
在财务报告过程中欺诈检测是资本市场参与者和其他利益相关者的首要任务(例如,埃利奥特,2002;委员会,2007)。
在公开上市交易的公司如安然和世通公司欺诈发生时市场参与者如投资者经历了重大的经济损失。
一些专家认为,在目前的经济衰退调查研究诈骗方式中财务报告舞弊率可能会增加(敏茨,2021)。
在ISA 240规定的欺诈检测是一个分配给审计人员具体任务。
审计人员通常使用帮助他们检测欺诈的工具称为分析程序(阿尔布雷克特,2021)。
分析程序是指重要比率分析和趋势分析以及由此产生的调查,与其他相关信息不一致或偏离预测值波动的关系。
许多研究者和诈骗者推荐的财务比率可以作为一个有效的工具来检测欺诈(印度野,2021;白,阴阳,2021;人,1995)。
Review of accounting studies,2003,16(8):531—560 Financial Statement Analysis of Leverage and How It Informs About Protability and Price-to-Book RatiosDoron Nissim,Stephen。
PenmanAbstractThis paper presents a financial statement analysis that distinguishes leverage that arises in financing activities from leverage that arises in operations. The analysis yields two leveraging equations,one for borrowing to finance operations and one for borrowing in the course of operations。
These leveraging equations describe how the two types of leverage affect book rates of return on equity。
An empirical analysis shows that the financial statement analysis explains cross-sectional differences in current and future rates of return as well as price-to—book ratios, which are based on expected rates of return on equity。
The paper therefore concludes that balance sheet line items for operating liabilities are priced differently than those dealing with financing liabilities。
中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文:ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTSWe need to use financial ratios in analyzing financial statements.—— The analysis of comparative financial statements cannot be made really effective unless it takes the form of a study of relationships between items in the statements. It is of little value, for example, to know that, on a given date, the Smith Company has a cash balance of $1oooo. But suppose we know that this balance is only -IV per cent of all current liabilities whereas a year ago cash was 25 per cent of all current liabilities. Since the bankers for the company usually require a cash balance against bank lines, used or unused, of 20 per cent, we can see at once that the firm's cash condition is exhibiting a questionable tendency.We may make comparisons between items in the comparative financial statements as follows:1. Between items in the comparative balance sheeta) Between items in the balance sheet for one date, e.g., cash may be compared with current liabilitiesb) Between an item in the balance sheet for one date and the same item in the balance sheet for another date, e.g., cash today may be compared with cash a year agoc) Of ratios, or mathematical proportions, between two items in the balance sheet for one date and a like ratio in the balance sheet for another date, e.g., the ratio of cash to current liabilities today may be compared with a like ratio a year ago and the trend of cash condition noted2. Between items in the comparative statement of income and expensea) Between items in the statement for a given periodb) Between one item in this period's statement and the same item in last period's statementc) Of ratios between items in this period's statement and similar ratios in last period's statement3. Between items in the comparative balance sheet and items in the comparative statement of income and expensea) Between items in these statements for a given period, e.g., net profit for this year may be calculated as a percentage of net worth for this yearb) Of ratios between items in the two statements for a period of years, e.g., the ratio of net profit to net worth this year may-be compared with like ratios for last year, and for the years preceding thatOur comparative analysis will gain in significance if we take the foregoing comparisons or ratios and; in turn, compare them with:I. Such data as are absent from the comparative statements but are of importance in judging a concern's financial history and condition, for example, the stage of the business cycle2. Similar ratios derived from analysis of the comparative statements of competing concerns or of concerns in similar lines of business What financialratios are used in analyzing financial statements.- Comparative analysis of comparative financial statements may be expressed by mathematical ratios between the items compared, for example, a concern's cash position may be tested by dividing the item of cash by the total of current liability items and using the quotient to express the result of the test. Each ratio may be expressed in two ways, for example, the ratio of sales to fixed assets may be expressed as the ratio of fixed assets to sales. We shall express each ratio in such a way that increases from period to period will be favorable and decreases unfavorable to financial condition.We shall use the following financial ratios in analyzing comparative financial statements:I. Working-capital ratios1. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities2. The ratio of cash to total current liabilities3. The ratio of cash, salable securities, notes and accounts receivable to total current liabilities4. The ratio of sales to receivables, i.e., the turnover of receivables5. The ratio of cost of goods sold to merchandise inventory, i.e., the turnover of inventory6. The ratio of accounts receivable to notes receivable7. The ratio of receivables to inventory8. The ratio of net working capital to inventory9. The ratio of notes payable to accounts payableIO. The ratio of inventory to accounts payableII. Fixed and intangible capital ratios1. The ratio of sales to fixed assets, i.e., the turnover of fixed capital2. The ratio of sales to intangible assets, i.e., the turnover of intangibles3. The ratio of annual depreciation and obsolescence charges to the assetsagainst which depreciation is written off4. The ratio of net worth to fixed assetsIII. Capitalization ratios1. The ratio of net worth to debt.2. The ratio of capital stock to total capitalization .3. The ratio of fixed assets to funded debtIV. Income and expense ratios1. The ratio of net operating profit to sales2. The ratio of net operating profit to total capital3. The ratio of sales to operating costs and expenses4. The ratio of net profit to sales5. The ratio of net profit to net worth6. The ratio of sales to financial expenses7. The ratio of borrowed capital to capital costs8. The ratio of income on investments to investments9. The ratio of non-operating income to net operating profit10. The ratio of net operating profit to non-operating expense11. The ratio of net profit to capital stock12. The ratio of net profit reinvested to total net profit available for dividends on common stock13. The ratio of profit available for interest to interest expensesThis classification of financial ratios is permanent not exhaustive. -Other ratios may be used for purposes later indicated. Furthermore, some of the ratios reflect the efficiency with which a business has used its capital while others reflect efficiency in financing capital needs. The ratios of sales to receivables, inventory, fixed and intangible capital; the ratios of net operating profit to total capital and to sales; and the ratios of sales to operating costs and expenses reflect efficiency in the use of capital.' Most of the other ratios reflect financial efficiency.B. Technique of Financial Statement AnalysisAre the statements adequate in general?-Before attempting comparative analysis of given financial statements we wish to be sure that the statements are reasonably adequate for the purpose. They should, of course, be as complete as possible. They should also be of recent date. If not, their use must be limited to the period which they cover. Conclusions concerning 1923 conditions cannot safely be based upon 1921 statements.Does the comparative balance sheet reflect a seasonable situation? If so, it is important to know financial conditions at both the high and low points of the season. We must avoid unduly favorable judgment of the business at the low point when assets are very liquid and debt is low, and unduly unfavorable judgment at the high point when assets are less liquid and debt likely to be relatively high.Does the balance sheet for any date reflect the estimated financial condition after the sale of a proposed new issue of securities? If so, in order to ascertain the actual financial condition at that date it is necessary to subtract the amount of the security issue from net worth, if the. issue is of stock, or from liabilities, if bonds are to be sold. A like amount must also be subtracted from assets or liabilities depending upon how the estimated proceeds of the issue are reflected in the statement.Are the statements audited or unaudited? It is often said that audited statements, that is, complete audits rather than statements "rubber stamped" by certified public accountants, are desirable when they can be obtained. This is true, but the statement analyst should be certain that the given auditing film's reputation is beyond reproach.Is working-capital situation favorable ?-If the comparative statements to be analyzed are reasonably adequate for the purpose, the next step is to analyze the concern's working-capital trend and position. We may begin by ascertaining the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. This ratioaffords-a test of the concern's probable ability to pay current obligations without impairing its net working capital. It is, in part, a measure of ability to borrow additional working capital or to renew short-term loans without difficulty. The larger the excess of current assets over current liabilities the smaller the risk of loss to short-term creditors and the better the credit of the business, other things being equal. A ratio of two dollars of current assets to one dollar of current liabilities is the "rule-of-thumb" ratio generally considered satisfactory, assuming all current assets are conservatively valued and all current liabilities revealed.The rule-of-thumb current ratio is not a satisfactory test ofworking-capital position and trend. A current ratio of less than two dollars for one dollar may be adequate, or a current ratio of more than two dollars for one dollar may be inadequate. It depends, for one thing, upon the liquidity of the current assets.The liquidity of current assets varies with cash position.-The larger the proportion of current assets in the form of cash the more liquid are the current assets as a whole. Generally speaking, cash should equal at least 20 per cent of total current liabilities (divide cash by total current liabilities). Bankers typically require a concern to maintain bank balances equal to 20 per cent of credit lines whether used or unused. Open-credit lines are not shown on the balance sheet, hence the total of current liabilities (instead of notes payable to banks) is used in testing cash position. Like the two-for-one current ratio, the 20 per cent cash ratio is more or less a rule-of-thumb standard.The cash balance that will be satisfactory depends upon terms of sale, terms of purchase, and upon inventory turnover. A firm selling goods for cash will find cash inflow more nearly meeting cash outflow than will a firm selling goods on credit. A business which pays cash for all purchases will need more ready money than one which buys on long terms of credit. The more rapidly the inventory is sold the more nearly will cash inflow equal cash outflow, other things equal.Needs for cash balances will be affected by the stage of the business cycle. Heavy cash balances help to sustain bank credit and pay expenses when a period of liquidation and depression depletes working capital and brings a slump in sales. The greater the effects of changes in the cycle upon a given concern the more thought the financial executive will need to give to the size of his cash balances.Differences in financial policies between different concerns will affect the size of cash balances carried. One concern may deem it good policy to carry as many open-bank lines as it can get, while another may carry only enough lines to meet reasonably certain needs for loans. The cash balance of the first firm is likely to be much larger than that of the second firm.The liquidity of current assets varies with ability to meet "acid test."- Liquidity of current assets varies with the ratio of cash, salable securities, notes and accounts receivable (less adequate reserves for bad debts), to total current liabilities (divide the total of the first four items by total current liabilities). This is the so-called "acid test" of the liquidity of current condition. A ratio of I: I is considered satisfactory since current liabilities can readily be paid and creditors risk nothing on the uncertain values of merchandise inventory. A less than 1:1 ratio may be adequate if receivables are quickly collected and if inventory is readily and quickly sold, that is, if its turnover is rapid andif the risks of changes in price are small.The liquidity of current assets varies with liquidity of receivables. This may be ascertained by dividing annual sales by average receivables or by receivables at the close of the year unless at that date receivables do not represent the normal amount of credit extended to customers. Terms of sale must be considered in judging the turnover of receivables. For example, if sales for the year are $1,200,000 and average receivables amount to $100,000, the turnover of receivables is $1,200,000/$100,000=12. Now, if credit terms to customers are net in thirty days we can see that receivables are paid promptly.Consideration should also be given market conditions and the stage of the business cycle. Terms of credit are usually longer in farming sections than in industrial centers. Collections are good in prosperous times but slow in periods of crisis and liquidation.Trends in the liquidity of receivables will also be reflected in the ratio of accounts receivable to notes receivable, in cases where goods are typically sold on open account. A decline in this ratio may indicate a lowering of credit standards since notes receivable are usually given to close overdue open accounts. If possible, a schedule of receivables should be obtained showing those not due, due, and past due thirty, sixty, and ninety days. Such a, schedule is of value in showing the efficiency of credits and collections and in explaining the trend in turnover of receivables. The more rapid the turnover of receivables the smaller the risk of loss from bad debts; the greater the savings of interest on the capital invested in receivables, and the higher the profit on total capital, other things being equal.Author(s): C. O. Hardy and S. P. Meech译文:财务报表分析A.财务比率我们需要使用财务比率来分析财务报表,比较财务报表的分析方法不能真正有效的得出想要的结果,除非采取的是研究在报表中项目与项目之间关系的形式。
外文文献翻译译文原文:Financial reporting of good news and bad news: evidence fromaccounting narrativesAbstract—Accounting narratives are an increasingly important medium of financial communication. In particular, they play a crucial role in the corporate annual report, allowing company management to present annual performance to users in a readily accessible manner. Research suggests that such narratives are widely used and considered important in the investment decisions of private and institutional investors. However, accounting narratives are unaudited and thus may be subject to impression management. This paper focuses on the chairman's narratives of the top 50 and bottom 50 listed UK companies ranked by percentage change in profit before taxation. The research examines whether companies with improving and declining performance report good and bad news in different ways. The findings suggest that both groups of companies prefer to emphasise the positive aspects of their performance. In addition, both groups prefer to take credit for good news themselves, while blaming the external environment for bad news. Thus, despite reporting on markedly different financial performance, management approach it in the same self-serving way.The results of this and previous research have important policy implications for financial reporting. The current auditing regulations could usefully be extended so that the narratives are more rigorously reviewed.1、IntroductionAccounting narratives represent an increasingly important financial reporting medium. These narratives, such as the chairman's statement in the UK or the president's letter in the US, typically occupy prime positions within the annual report. They allow management to present a serial, annual description of corporate financial performance. Empirical research in the US has demonstrated that both the inclusion and the content of president's letters significantly affect the judgments of individuals in equity investment decisions (Kaplan etal.,1990).The importance of accounting narratives is well documented. Studies in Australia and New Zealand (Anderson and Epstein, 1996), in the UK (Bartlett and Chandler, 1997) and in the US (Epstein and Pava,1993) all show that accounting narratives, especially the chairman's statement or equivalent, are particularly useful and important parts of the annual report. For example, in the UK, Bartlett and Chandler (1997) show that out of 17 sections of the annual report, the chairman's statement is the most read (read thoroughly by 48% of readership) and ranked second in overall importance by private shareholders. Studies of the use of information by sophisticated users, such as investment analysts and institutional investors, also show that narrative sections of the annual report are considered important in making investment decisions (e.g.. Lee and Tweedie,1981). Arnold and Moizer(1984) find that, after the financial statements, the chairman's statement is the most influential information source in the annual report to both financial analysts and institutional investors. Moreover, in an empirical study involving earnings and share price data, Abrahamson and Amir (1996) determine that the president's letter contains useful information about the future of a company. Smith and Taffler (2000) also demonstrate that the content of the chairman's statement is highly predictive of insolvency.Accounting narratives are a relatively new phenomena. In 1973, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA: 13) stated: 'Financial statements should not be limited solely to quantified information. Amplification, in narrative form, of data included in statements may be required' (emphasis added). A generation later, it is rare to find an annual report which does not contain extensive narratives. Indeed, these narratives are now encouraged by the regulatory authorities (for example, the management discussion and analysis is mandatory in the US and the operating and financial review is recommended in the UK).As the UK's Accounting Standards Board (ASB) explains (1993: 1), 'there is a growing need for annual reports to include an objective discussion that analyses and explains the main features underlying the results and financial position'. The nature and extent of accounting narratives, however, still takes even informed onlookers by surprise. Arthur Andersen (1996: 5), for example, comment: 'What surprised us was that the 'narrative' pages exceeded or equaled the number in the statutory financial statements in half of our survey companies' [100 UKpuhlic limited companies] annual reports.' More recently, Arthur Andersen (2001) point to an increase in the proportion of large listed companies' annual reports devoted to narrative information from 45% (in 1996) to 57% in 2000.Comparatively little research has been conducted into accounting narratives in annual reports, despite their growing importance. This is especially true compared to the wealth of research devoted to the financial statements. Research is particularly timely because of the current largely discretionary and unaudited nature of accounting narratives.The situation in the UK is typical of that worldwide. SAS No. 160, the applicable UK auditing standard, states 'auditors have no responsibility to report that the other information (i.e., accounting narratives contained in the annual report with the audited financial statements) is properly stated.Auditors should, however, read the other information and if they identify material inconsistencies with the financial statements or misstatements within the accounting narratives they should seek to resolve them' (APB, 1995, para.4). In practice, however, these provisions are difficult to interpret and act upon. This gives management opportunities to select, discuss and explain corporate financial performance largely untroubled by mandatory constraints. If they wish, management may therefore indulge in impression management by influencing (or attempting to influence) the perceptions of users. This may, in turn, lead to conflicting messages being given in the narrative statements and in the quantitative financial statements (Smith and Taffler,1995).This current paper aims to add to our knowledge of accounting narratives, especially their role in impression management. The particular focus of this paper is the chairman's statements from the annual reports of 50 UK listed companies reporting improving performance and 50 UK listed companies reporting declining performance. The chairman's statement is not only the most read of the UK's accounting narratives, but also the longest established. These narratives provide a forum to investigate the key question of whether companies with improving and declining performance adopt the same reporting strategies.The main purpose of this study is to ascertain whether the amount of news and level of attributions in the chairman's statements of companies with improving and declining performance are significantly different. In particular, we focus on two mainissues. First, does the nature and amount of the good and bad news reported vary between the two groups of companies? Second, do the attribution patterns (i.e. explanations given by management) for good and bad news vary?This study is innovative for three different reasons. First, this is the first study based on annual reports taken from the 1990s, thus reflecting the contemporary public relations nature of many annual reports. In particular, as Lee (1994) points out, the annual report has evolved from a financially-driven document to one used to construct a corporate image. Second, this is the only paper (except for Aerts,1994; 2001) that approaches the topic of impression management in accounting narratives from an accounting rather than a managerial perspective. Third, this study represents the first research into impression management in accounting narratives in a UK context.The UK represents a particularly useful context in which to study impression management. There is a long tradition in the UK of the chairman addressing the shareholders. This statement is voluntary, but conventionally provides an overview of annual corporate performance. In the UK, unlike the US, litigation by shareholders in a financial reporting context is rare. Consequently, chairmen have more freedom to discuss and debate annual corporate performance in the UK than in the US. For example, the US Jenkins committee notes that the US legal environment discourages companies from discussing forward-looking information (Weetman, and Collins, 1996). Indeed, it is commonly acknowledged that US accounting narratives are more constrained through a greater fear of litigation than their UK counterparts (e.g., see Bolger, 1994;Weetman and Collins, 1996). Thus, there is arguably more scope in the UK for impression management.The remainder of this paper contains four sections, followed by recommendations and a conclusion. Section 2 examines the prior literature into accounting narratives, focusing on attribution Studies. Hypotheses are then developed based on this literature. In Section 3, the methods of the study are presented. Section 4 presents the findings, followed by a discussion in Section 5.2、Literature reviewThe theory and practice of impression management is well documented in accounting research. The phenomenon is rooted in human psychological and cognitiveprocesses and has been extensively documented in the psychology literature.Impression management has also been commonly applied in areas such as human behaviour and politics. In theory, company management have incentives to represent their company's performance in the best possible light, which may cause 'selective financial representation (Revsine,1991). These incentives include increased remuneration and job security (e.g., DeAngelo,1988).Aerts(2001) points out that these incentives are greatest for listed companies. In practice, impression management is demonstrated across a whole range of accounting research issues: the accounting profession (Neu,1991;Neu and Wright, 1992); earnings manipulation (Watts and Zimmerman, 1986, 1990;Schipper, 1989; Phillips and Drew, 1991; Smith 1992); graphs (Steinbart,1989; Beattie and Jones,1992; 1997; 1998) and photographs (McKinstry,1996; Graves et al., 1996; Preston et al., 1996).The study of accounting narratives is an important sub-set of the accounting literature. Jones and Shoemaker (1994), for example, identify 36 thematic and 32 readability studies up to 1993. This current literature review focuses more narrowly on attribution studies. In accounting, such studies seek to determine whether company management systematically attribute favourable news to internal corporate efforts and unfavourable news to external events.Essentially, attribution concerns self-serving human behaviour. It serves the basic psychological human need of presenting oneself in such a way as to gain favourable reactions from others (Turner,1991). In accounting, four US studies investigate and find evidence supportive of attribution theory (Bettman and Weitz, 1983;Staw et al., 1983;Salancik and Meindl,1984; and Clapham and Schwenk,1991).*Bettman and Weitz (1983) investigate the president's letter to shareholders in 181 annual reports published in 1972 and 1974.They find that 'unfavourable outcomes were attributed more to external, unstable and uncontrollable causes than were favourable outcomes (1983: 165). These attributions are most prevalent when companies do worse than expected, although Bettman and Weitz (1983) do not partition their sample by company performance. Staw et al.(1983) investigate the president's letters to shareholders in annual reports in 1977 for 46 firms with significant earnings increases and 29 firms with significant earnings decreases. They find that '(a)s expected, the more negative theshareholders' letters, the greater was the attribution to industry and environmental causes and the less was the attribution to company causes' (1983: 591/2). Even for unsuccessful companies, positive events make up over half of attributions.Salancik and Meindl's (1984) results broadly reinforce those of the other three studies. They test the letters to shareholders of 18 stable and unstable US firms (as measured by variation in sales and earnings measures) from 1961 to 1978. All management displays a strong tendency to credit themselves for positive outcomes and blame negative effects on the environment. Indeed, management are three times more likely to take credit for their firm's good performance than to make any other causal statement. Moreover, they are also three times more likely to blame the environment for setbacks.Finally, Clapham and Schwen (1991) investigate the president's letters of companies in the US electricity and gas utility sector from 1978-82.Although they follow Salancik and Meindl's methodology, they find some differences from them in the pattern of results between stable and unstable firms. Overall, however, they find that executives in 20 companies take credit for positive outcomes, but lay blame on the vironment for negative outcomes.Although these studies find some evidence of attribution in the US in the 1980s, the methodological approach is limited in two respects. First, the unit of analysis is the attribution statement, so no account is taken of the number of words. Second, no distinction is formally made between explicit and implicit attributions. This distinction is important because it enables a more refined analysis of the data.From: Accounting and business research,[J].2003 (3):171-185.一、翻译文章译文:财务报表中的好消息与坏消息:运用会计报表附注来证明摘要——会计报表附注已成为金融交流的一种重要的媒介,它的重要性日显突出。
财务报告及其披露词汇翻译1. Financial report - 财务报告2. Statement of financial position - 资产负债表4. Cash flow statement - 现金流量表5. Notes to the financial statements - 财务报表附注6. Auditor's report - 审计师报告7. Balance sheet - 资产负债表8. Profit and loss statement - 损益表10. Gross margin - 毛利率12. Earnings per share - 每股收益13. Dividends - 股息14. Equity - 资本15. Liabilities - 负债16. Cash and cash equivalents - 现金及现金等价物17. Accounts receivable - 应收账款18. Intangible assets - 无形资产19. Depreciation - 折旧20. Amortization - 摊销21. Contingent liabilities - 或有负债22. Related parties - 关联方23. Fair value - 公允价值24. Working capital - 营运资金25. Non-current liabilities - 非流动负债26. Provision - 准备金27. Shareholders' equity - 股东权益28. Cash ratio - 现金比率29. Return on investment - 投资回报率30. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) - 税前利润注意:以上词汇仅为参考,具体翻译需根据上下文和财务报告的具体要求进行调整。
XX 股份有限公司XX Company Limited 审计报告Auditors' Report XX 审字[201X]第 X-XXXXX 号XX SHEN ZI [201X] No. X-XXXXXAuditors' ReportXX SHEN ZI [201X] No. X-XXXXX To the Shareholders of XX Co., Ltd:We have audited the accompanying financial statements of XX Co., Ltd (hereafter referred to as “the Company”), which comprise the consolidated and the Company's balance sheets as at December 31, 201X, the consolidated and the Company's statements of income, the consolidated and the Company's statements of cash flows and the consolidated and the Company's statements of changes in equity for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements.I. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial StatementsManagement is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.II. Auditor’s ResponsibilityOur responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Chinese Certified Public Accountants Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with the Code of Ethics for Chinese Certified Public Accountants and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend o n the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparat ion and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating theappropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.III. OpinionIn our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and its subsidiariies as at December 31, 20X5, and their financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises.WUYIGE CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS LLP.Certified Public Accountant of ChinaCertified Public Accountant of ChinaBeijing . ChinaDate: XX XX, 20X6 (Month, date, Year)(All amounts in Chinese Renminbi Yuan unless otherwise stated)1. Company profile1.1 The Company's registered place, organization structure and the address of head quarter.1.2 The Company's business nature and main operation activities, like its industry, primary product or service, customers' nature, trading strategy and supervisory environment etc.1.3 The approver and approval date of the financial reporting.1.4 The consolidation scope of financial year 20X5 consolidated financial statements includes the Company and its subsidiaries (hereafter referred to as "the Company").【简要说明本年度的合并财务报表范围,并与“本附注六、合并范围的变更”“本附注七、在其他主体中的权益”索引。
文献信息:文献标题:The Need Of Financial Statement Analysis In A Firm orAn Orgnization(企业或机构财务报表分析的必要性)国外作者:Suneetha G文献出处:《International Journal of Science Engineering and AdvanceI Technology(JSEAT)》,2017,5(6):731-735.字数统计:2541 单词,15110 字符;中文 4377 汉字外文文献:The Need Of Financial Statement AnalysisIn A Firm Or An OrgnizationAbstract Financial statement analysis play a dominate role in setting the frame watt of managerial decisions through analysis and interpretation of financial statement. This paper discusses about financial … strength and weakness of the company by properly establishing relationship between the items of balance shed and profit and loss account. In order to judge the profitability and financial soundness of the company horizontal, and vertical analyze or done. The various technique used in analyzing financial statement included 'comparative statement, common size statement, trend analysis and ratio analysis. The results suggest that the ratio approach is a highly useful tool in financial statement analysis, especially when a set of ratios is used to evaluate a firm's performance.Key words: Financial statement analysis, to evaluate a firm's performance.'Comparative statement. Common size statement, trend analysis and ratio analysis.1.IntroductionThe basis for financial analysis , planning and decision making is financial information/a business firm has to prepares its financial accounts viz., balance sheet , profit and loss account which provides useful financial information for the purpose of decision making . Financial information is needed to predict. Compare and evaluate the fin's earnings ability. The formers statements viz. profit and loss account shows that operating activities of the concern and the later balance sheet depicts the balance value of the acquired assets and of liabilities at a particular point of time. However these statements don't disclose all of the necessary for ascertaining the financial strengths and weaknesses of an enterprise. it is necessary to analyze the data depicted in the financial statements. The finance manager has certain analytical tools which helps is financial analysis and planning. [Doron nissim, stephen h. Penman, (2003), FinancialStatement Analysis of Leverage and How it Informs About Profitability and Price-to-Book Ratios. Survey of Accounting Studies, Kluwer Academic Publishers] As per examine by 'Doron Nissim. Stephen H. Penman' on Financial proclamation investigation of Leverage and how it illuminates about gainfulness and cost to book proportions, money related explanation examination that recognizes use that emerges in financing exercises from use that emerges in operations. The examination yields two utilizing conditions. one for getting to back operations and one for obtaining over the span of operations. This examination demonstrates that the budgetary explanation investigation clarifies cross-sectional contrasts in present and future rates of return and additionally cost to-snare proportions, which depend on expected rates of profit for value. This investigation helps in understanding working influence contrasts in productivity in the cross-areas. changes in future productivity from current benefit and legally binding working liabilities from evaluated liabilities. [Yating Van, H.W. Chuang,(2010) Financial Ratio Adjustment Process: Evidencefrom Taiwan and North America,1SSN 1450-2887 Issue 43 (2010)0 Euro Journals Publishing, Inc. 2010]2.Financial statements analysisIt is a process of identifying the financial strengths and weaknesses of a firm from the available accounting data and financial statements. The analysis is done by properly establishing the relationship between the items of balance sheet and profit and loss account. The first task of the financial analyst is to determine the information relevant the decision under consideration from the total information contained in financial statement. The second step is to arrange information in a way to highlight significant relationships. The final step is interpretation and drawing of inferences and conclusions. Thus financial analysis is the process of selection, relating and evaluation of the accounting data or information.Purpose of financial statements analysisFinancial statements analysis is the meaningful interpretation of 'financial statements 'for panics demanding financial information. It is not necessary for the proprietors alone. In general, the purpose of financial statements analysis is to aid decision making between the users of accounts•To evaluate past performance and financial position•To predict future performanceTools and techniques of financial analysis:•Comparative balance sheet•Common size balance sheet•Trend analysis•Ratio analysis•Comparative balance sheetComparative financial statements is a statement of the financial position of a business so designed as to facilitate comparison of different accounting variables for drawing useful inferences. Financial statements of two or more business enter prices may be compared over period of years. This is known as inter firm comparison Financial statements of the particular business enter pries may be compared over two periods of years. This is known inter period comparisonCommon size statementsIt facilities the comparison of two or more business entities with a common base .in case of balance sheet, total assets or liabilities or capital can be taken as a common base. These statements are called common measurements or components percentage or 100 percent statements. Since each statement is representated as a %of the total of 100 which in variably serves as the base.In this manner the announcements arranged to draw out the proportion of every benefit of risk to the aggregate of the monetary record and the proportion of every thing of cost or incomes to net deals known as the basic size articulations.Pattern investigationEven examination of money related explanations can likewise be completed by figuring pattern rates. Pattern rate expresses quite a long while's budgetary information as far as a base year. The base year rises to 100 %, with every single other year expressed in some rate of this baseProportion investigationProportion investigation is the technique or process by which the relationship of things or gatherings of things in the budgetary proclamations are registered. decided and introduced. Proportion investigation is an endeavor to determine quantitativemeasures or aides concerning the money related wellbeing and benefit of the business venture. Proportion investigation can be utilized both in pattern and static examination. There are a few proportions at the examiner yet the gathering of proportions he would incline toward relies upon the reason and the destinations of the investigation.Bookkeeping proportions are viable apparatuses of examination; they are pointers of administrative and over all operational productivity. Proportions, when appropriately utilized are fit for giving valuable data. proportion examination is characterized as the deliberate utilization of proportions to decipher the money related explanations with the goal that the qualities and shortcomings of a firm and in addition its chronicled execution and current monetary condition can be resolved the term proportion alludes to the numerical or quantitative connection between things factors this relationship can be communicated as:(1)Fraction(2)Percentages(3)Proportion of numbersThese option strategies for communicating things which are identified with each other are, for reason for money related investigation, alluded to as proportion examination. It ought to be seen that processing the proportion does not include any data in the figures of benefit or deals. What the proportions do is that they uncover the relationship in a more important manner in order to empower us to reach inferences from them.As indicated by look into by the Yating yang and 11.W. Chuang. on 'Monetary Ratio Adjustment Process: Evidence from Taiwan and North America'. measurable legitimacy of the proportion strategy in monetary articulation examination is researched. The outcomes hence recommend that the proportion approach is a valuable instrument in monetary explanation investigation, particularly when an arrangement of proportions is utilized to assess an association's execution. Thestraightforwardness of this strategy additionally underpins the utilization of proportions in money related basic leadership.3.Money related proportions in perspective of GAAPGAAP is the arrangement of standard systems for recording business exchanges and detailing accounting report passages. The components of GAAP incorporate norms for how to figure income, how to arrange things on a monetary record, and how to ascertain exceptional offer estimations. The models fused into (MAP give general consistency in assumes that are thusly used to ascertain imperative money related proportions that financial specialists and investigators use to assess the organization. Indeed, even agreeable monetary records can be trying to unravel, yet without a framework characterizing every class of section, corporate money related articulations would be basically dark and useless.There are seven fundamental rule that guide the foundation of the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The standards of normality, consistency, perpetual quality and genuineness go towards the urging organizations to utilize the same legitimate bookkeeping hones quarter after quarter in a decent confidence push to demonstrate the genuine money related state of the organization. None remuneration, judiciousness and progression build up rules for how to set up a monetary record, by and large to report the budgetary status of the organization as it is without treating resources in irregular ways that distort the operations of the organization just to balance different sections. The rule of periodicity basic implies that salary to be gotten extra time ought to be recorded as it is booked to be gotten, not in a singular amount in advance.The brought together arrangement of bookkeeping in this manner has various advantages. Not exclusively does it give a specific level of straightforwardness into an organization's funds. it likewise makes for generally simple examinations betweenorganizations. Subsequently, GAAP empowers venture by helping financial specialists pick shrewdly. GAAP gives America organizations preference over remote ones where financial specialists, unless they have a cozy comprehension of the business, may have a great deal more trouble figuring the potential dangers and prizes of a venture. GAAP applies to U.S.- based enterprises just, however every other real nation has bookkeeping measures set up for their local organizations. Now and again, remote bookkeeping is genuinely like U.S. GAAP, changing in just minor and effectively represented ways. In different cases, the models change fundamentally making direct examinations questionable, best case scenario.4.Advantages and Limitations of Financial Ratio AnalysisFinancial ratio analysis is a useful tool for users of financial statement. It has following advantages:Focal points•It improves the money related proclamations.•It helps in contrasting organizations of various size and each other.•It helps in drift examination which includes looking at a solitary organization over a period.•It highlights imperative data in basic frame rapidly. A client can judge an organization by simply taking a gander at few number as opposed to perusing of the entire monetary explanations.RestrictionsRegardless of convenience, finance.ial proportion examination has a few burdens. Some key faults of budgetary proportion examination are:•Different organizations work in various enterprises each having distinctivenatural conditions, for example, control, showcase structure, and so on. Such factors curve so huge that a correlation of two organizations from various ventures may be deceiving.•Financial bookkeeping data is influenced by assessments and presumptions. Bookkeeping principles permit diverse bookkeeping arrangements, which disables likeness and subsequently proportion examination is less helpful in such circumstances.• Ratio investigation clarifies connections between past data while clients are more worried about present and future data.The investigation helps for breaking down the alteration procedure of money related proportions; the model states three impacts which circular segment an association's interior impact, expansive impact, and key administration. It encourages us to clarify(1)That a company's budgetary proportions reflect unforeseen changes in the business.(2)Active endeavors to accomplish the coveted focus by administration and(3)An individual association's money related proportion development.DialogMonetary proclamations investigation is the way toward looking at connections among components of the organization's 'bookkeeping articulations" or money related explanations (accounting report, salary articulation. proclamation of income and the announcement of held profit) and making correlations with pertinent data. It is a significant instrument utilized by financial specialists. leasers, monetary investigators. proprietors. administrators and others in their basic leadership handle The most well known sorts of money related explanations examination curve:•Horizontal Analysis: monetary data are thought about for at least two years for asolitary organization:•Vertical Analysis: every thing on a solitary monetary explanation is figured as a rate of an aggregate for a solitary organization;•Ratio Analysis: analyze things on a solitary budgetary articulation or look at the connections between things on two monetary proclamations.Money related proportions examination is the most widely recognized type of budgetary explanations investigation. Monetary proportions delineate connections between various parts of an organization's operations and give relative measures of the company's conditions and execution. Monetary proportions may give intimations and side effects of the money related condition and signs of potential issue regions. It by and large holds no importance unless they are looked at against something else, as past execution, another organization/contender or industry normal. In this way, the proportions of firms in various enterprises, which confront distinctive conditions, are generally difficult to analyze.Money related proportions can be a critical instrument for entrepreneurs and administrators to gauge their advance toward achieving organization objectives, and toward contending with bigger organizations inside an industry; likewise, following different proportions after some time is an intense approach to recognize patterns. Proportion examination, when performed routinely after some time, can likewise give assistance independent ventures perceive and adjust to patterns influencing their operations.Money related proportions are additionally utilized by financiers. Speculators and business experts to survey different traits of an organization's monetary quality or working outcomes, this is another motivation behind why entrepreneurs need to comprehend money related proportions in light of the fact that, all the time, a business' capacity to get financing or value financing will rely upon the organization's budgetary proportions. Money related proportions are ordered by the monetary part ofthe business which the proportion measures. Liquidity proportions look at the accessibility of organization's money to pay obligation. Productivity proportions measure the organization's utilization of its benefits and control of its costs to create a satisfactory rate of return. Use proportions look at the organization's techniques for financing and measure its capacity to meet budgetary commitments. Productivity proportions measure how rapidly a firm changes over non-money resources for money resources. Market proportions measure financial specialist reaction to owning an organization's stock and furthermore the cost of issuing stock.5.ConclusionProportion Analysis is a type of Financial Statement Analysis that is utilized to acquire a snappy sign of an association's money related execution in a few key territories. Proportion investigation is utilized to assess connections among money related proclamation things. The proportions are utilized to distinguish inclines after some time for one organization or to look at least two organizations at one point in time. Money related explanation proportion investigation concentrates on three key parts of a business: liquidity, benefit, and dissolvability.The proportions are sorted as Short-term Solvency Ratios, Debt Management Ratios, and Asset Management Ratios. Productivity Ratios, and Market Value Ratios. Proportion Analysis as an instrument has a few vital elements. The information, which are given by budgetary proclamations. are promptly accessible. The calculation of proportions encourages the examination of firms which contrast in measure. Proportions can be utilized to contrast an association's money related execution and industry midpoints. What's more, proportions can be utilized as a part of a type of pattern investigation to recognize zones where execution has enhanced or crumbled after some time. Since Ratio Analysis depends on bookkeeping data, its adequacy is restricted by the bends which emerge in budgetary explanations because of such things as Historical Cost Accounting and swelling. Thusly, Ratio Analysis should justbe utilized as an initial phase in money related examination, to get a snappy sign of an association's execution and to distinguish territories which should be explored further.中文译文:企业或机构财务报表分析的必要性摘要财务报表分析在制定管理决策框架方面起着主导作用,其方法是通过对财务报表进行分析和解释。
外文文献翻译译文原文:Manufacturing Corporate Identities: An Analysis of FinancialStatement Footnote DisclosuresFinancial reporting of organizational performance is facilitated primarily through financial statements and the related supplemental disclosures found in the annual report or Form 10-K. Standardized financial statements, such as the income statement, balance sheet and statement of cash flows, are mostly uniform in format and thus provide for inter-firm comparisons of various financial metrics. This ―boilerplate‖ format provides for simple ―net income‖ or ―current assets‖ comparisons between firms given the uniformity of the content contained within each financial statement; however, there are supplemental disclosures contained within these reports that should provide additional information to illuminate and thereby enhance the financial statement content.We previously studied a McDonald-ized or scripted boilerplate discourse in place for corporate financial reporting that extended beyond the financial statement format (Hillon & Smith, 2004). Due to the lack of specific requirements on management discussion and analysis and financial disclosure footnote formatting, the prevailing theory on organizational identity suggests that firms should use financial narratives to differentiate themselves from their competitors thereby manufacturing their corporate identity. Given this, we expected to find a wide array of supplemental reporting content that was also as unique and differentiable as the firms themselves. To test this we obtained a random sample from the S&P 500 Index of firms and examined the frequency distributions of the number of footnotes and related page number totals contained in each of the supplemental financial footnote disclosures from each firm within our sample. We found a clustering tendency, which is suggestive of a homogeneous rather than heterogeneous firm identity. We next performed a content analysis of the supplemental footnote disclosures. When we categorized the footnotes by actual title using the firm with the fewest number offootnotes as the minimum, over 70% of the sample firms had identical or similar footnote titles. We then analyzed the related footnote content and found an even stronger relationship with over 90% of the firms reporting the same or similar content. The implications of our preliminary findings are important in light of corporate identity as they are more supportive of a homogeneous reporting regiment rather than a heterogeneous firm identity. We conclude with these implications and the need for further research in this area.The origins of research into organizational identity can be traced back much further than the field of organization studies itself. For instance, the looking-glass self was a phrase coined by one of the luminaries in the field of sociology (Cooley, 1909) to describe the construction of identity as a reflexive socialization process. We look into the mirror of society to see how others view and judge our behavior, and over time, a distinctive identity is shaped and constructed (Tischler, 2002). Corporate identities can also be viewed as the products of reflexive social interaction, as annual reports, financial disclosures, and feedback from both shareholders and regulating entities constitute a process that is analogous to looking into a mirror to both assess and influence the perceptions of society.Glynn, Barr, & Dacin (2000, p. 730-731) have observed that ―because an identity is self- reflexive, it influences how the organization’s strategic issues are defined and resolved.‖ However, the major difficulty in assessing the social influences on identity construction is the necessity of identifying the salient contextual factors that enable separation of an organization from its environment, as well as categorization of components within the organization. This continual search for novel dimensions of comparison implies that social identities never completely coalesce around static values and terminal meaning. Also, the concepts of status and legitimacy are presumed to be transient. Hence, motivated by an imbalance in social status, an organization that compares unfavorably in strategic competencies to its competitors may attempt to showcase other more favorable attributes to enhance its identity (Chattopadhyay, Tluchowska, & George, 2004).Hogg&Terry (2002, p. 125) suggested that benchmarking with a set ofdifferentially prestigious organizations is ―one way in which organizations may deliberately manipulate the inter-group social comparative context.‖ Fin ancial data in both quantitative and qualitative form is the lingua franca of benchmarking studies, thus, within a social identity theory frame; one would expect to find salient differences in form and content of all such identity defining prototypes. For our study, this implies that creative responses to ameliorate the perceived inequalities among corporations should appear, at least from time to time, in the identity construction tools available to each organization. Thus, we should expect to occasionally see distinctive form and content in the financial metrics and narratives of corporate disclosures. At the very least, we should expect to see some form of stratification based on prestige or attempts at social mobility.Previous research has suggested a need for further exploration of this phenomenon, as Hillon and Smith’s (2004) financial socialization pilot study found more of a McDonaldized or scripted ―boilerplate‖ discourse in place for corporate financial reporting. Due to the lack of specific requirements on management discussion and analysis and financial footnote disclosure formatting, the prevailing theory on organizational identity suggests that firms should use these financial narratives and metrics to differentiate themselves from their competitors. The capital markets need financial information to differentiate firms and thereby avoid the problem of adverse selection. According to Scott (2003, p. 11- 12): to understand how financial accounting can help to control the adverse selection problem, it is desirable to have an appreciation of how investors make decisions. This is because knowledge of investor decision processes is essential if the accountant is to know what information they need. The accounting reaction to securities market efficiency has been full disclosure, that is, the supplying of large amounts of information to help investors make their own predictions of future firm performance. The form of the disclosure does not matter – it can be in notes, or in supplementary disclosures such as reserve recognition accounting and management discussion and analysis, in addition to the financial statements proper.From another perspective, the FASB issued a pronouncement addressing theusefulness of financial disclosures in Statement of Financial Accounting Concept (SFAC) Number 2. This authoritative pronouncement essentially defined the relevance of financial information in assisting the financial statement users to form their own understanding of financial events relative to their expectations. In addition to present events, the financial information can also assist the user in forming predictions of events such as future profitability. SFAC 2 (1996, p. 1035) stated in part: Relevant accounting information is capable of making a difference in a decision by helping users to form predictions about outcomes of past, present, and future events or to confirm or correct prior expectations. Information can make a difference to decisions by improving decision makers’ capacities to predict or by providing feedback on earlier expectations. Usually, information does both at once, because knowledge about the outcomes of actions already taken will generally improve decision makers’ abilities to predict the results of similar future actions. Without knowledge of the past, the basis for a prediction will usually be lacking. Without an interest in the future, knowledge of the past is sterile.From an organizational perspective, Scott (1981, p. 89) noted that ―interaction with the environment is essential for open system functioning.‖ Information is an essential link between the firm and the environment in which it operates and the financial information disseminated by a firm is extremely important to outside investors and financial decision-makers, the primary constituents of the capital markets. Authoritative literature in accounting and management presupposes that the financial information disclosed by management will be understood and appropriately utilized by the capital markets (Jones & Shoemaker, 1994), regardless of the accounting methods applied. However, as the gatekeeper to essentially perfect information about the firm, management controls access to sensitive proprietary information. Accordingly, management selectively offers information disclosures to the capital markets, rather than all firm information, in order to shape its corporate identity.The FASB stated in SFAC 1 (1996, p. 1018) that: ―the usefulness of financial information as an aid to investors, creditors, and others in forming expectations abouta business enterprise may be enhanced by management’s explanations of the information. Management knows more about the enterprise and its affairs than investors, creditors, and other ―outsiders‖.Given that it has this superior information management may choose to selectively communicate financial information to those outside of the firm by means of financial disclosures. Thus, management must balance the needs for disseminating information in the interest of securities market efficiency against its own needs for continually shaping and constructing its social identity. The FAS addressed this responsibility for balance reporting by management in SFAC1 (1996, p. 1014) as follows:Financial reporting should provide information that is useful to present and potential investors and creditors and other users in making rational investment, credit, and similar decisions. The information should be comprehensible to those who have a reasonable understanding of business and economic activities and are willing to study the information with reasonable diligence.In light of management’s dual purposes for information dissemination, we cannot overemphasize the necessity for users of their financial disclosures to exercise due diligence in attaining a balanced understanding of the information content to thus make judicious investment decisions.Failure to fully observe and comprehend all of the disclosed financial information does not adversely impact the quality of the financial information. However, such a partial vie w into Cooley’s (1909 looking-glass of reflexive identity would likely distort the reflected image, contrary to the firm’s intent. Thus, in anticipation of potential image distortion, we would expect firms to overemphasize, rather than underplay, their salient and distinctive features through al channels at their disposal. Supplemental financial disclosures were intended by the FASB to aid in clarifying the unique business circumstances that arise in the life of every firm. Information reifies the corporate identity, and thus, we would expect supplemental financial disclosures to enable investors to further differentiate among firms. To test this assertion, we turned our attention to a practical assessment of the management’suse of financial information as a versatile too of corporate identity construction.MethodsWe took a random sample of 30 companies from the Standard and Poor 500 Index and then obtained the latest year end annual report or Form 10k for each firm selected. Next, we analyzed the form and content of the footnote disclosures for the financial statements contained therein with both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Supplemental footnote disclosures provide needed illumination of the basic set of required financial statements contained in each annual report or Form 10k. These minimum expectations for statement disclosures quite rationally should lead to a uniform ―boilerplate‖ financial statement format, as ―organizational fields establish norms that create cognitive expectations for ot her organizations to follow‖ (Glynn, Barr, & Dacin, 2000, p. 730). However, the same line of reasoning should not apply to the form and content of supplemental footnotes that purport to illuminate firm-specific elements of the financial statements. Hence, one should very reasonably not expect to find them presented in a uniform or ―boiler plate‖ format. Next, to facilitate a quantitative content analysis, we began by counting the number of footnote disclosures as well as the related number of pages from each company report from our sample set. These supplemental footnote disclosures provide needed illumination of the basic set of required financial statements contained in each annual report or Form 10-K. While we concede the necessity of a uniform ―boiler plate‖ financial statement format our concern was that the supplemental footnotes that provide additional specific information in order to illuminate the financial statements were not themselves a uniform or ―boiler plate‖ format. We then observed the freque ncy distributions of the total number of footnotes and the total number of pages containing the footnote disclosures for each firm.After counting the total number of footnotes and related number of total pages contained in each company report and assessing the sample through descriptive statistics, our next step was to classify and categorize the footnote disclosures by title and then content. We designated the firm with the fewest number of footnotes as our minimum value disclosure and then compared the other firms in the sample byfootnote title and then by content to that minimum value firm.Similarities and differences were then observed for both footnote title used as well as for actual footnote content. For purposes of categorization, our table for the footnote titles consisted of a matrix with the actual titles used in the minimum number of notes firm with four categories of footnote titles classified as either: (a) Same, (b) Similar, (c) Different, or (d) Not Found For a footnote title to be classifi ed as ―Same‖ the title would have to be identical. For example, the footnote title Income Taxes was found in the minimum footnote firm. Thus, for any firm to be categorized as ―Same,‖ the title would have to be labeled identically as Income Taxes. A footnote title of Provision for Income Taxes would be classified as ―Similar,‖ as the title includes income Taxes, but is not strictly identical. If references to income taxes were included in a footnote section under a title such as Deferred Obligations, then the classification would be ―Different.‖ Finally, if there were no provision for income taxes in the disclosure notes and thus, no related footnote title, then ―Not Found‖ would be the appropriate classification. We then reviewed the footnote titles matrix for any related content of the footnote disclosuresThe purpose of this exhaustive review was to further clarify the categorization of the footnotes by incorporating the content. For example, Firm A may have had lease activity disclosed in the footnotes un der the title of ―Leases‖. Firm B may have also had leasing activities but disclosed the content in a footnote titled―Commitments‖. By only considering the footnote titles Firm A would be categorized as having lease related disclosures whereas Firm B would not be categorized with leasing activities. This potential obfuscation is thus mitigated when content is considered for purposes of categorization. Accordingly, both firms would be properly categorized as―Similar‖ in the footnote content matrix and thereby elucidate the similarities among firms that may not be apparent by only considering the footnote titles. A presentation and discussion of the descriptive statistics for our analysis follows in the next section.ConclusionOur initial findings are suggestive of a homogeneous rather than heterogeneous regiment of supplemental financial disclosures. In concluding that firms apparentlyuse their supplemental financial disclosures to decrease distinctiveness among peers, we end this study with a better empirical understanding of the complex phenomenon of corporate identity construction. However, the theoretical assumptions of differentiation from previous research may need to be reconsidered in light of our preliminary findings and thus may require that we now consider other sources to provide a more meaningful theoretical basis for future research. Echoing Albert & Whetten (1985), Pratt & Foreman (2000) explored how organizations manage the multiple competing and often conflicting identities within the collective by assessing their self-identified central, distinctive, and enduring attributes. One of the strategic benefits of a diversity of identities noted in their study is that a minimal set of identities serves to increase the organization’s repertoire of responses to a complex environment. In essence, a corporate identity is the superficial reflection of the organization’s underlying requisite variety. We attempted to extend this line of reasoning by positing that the firm’s financial disclosures should al so constitute just such a superficial representation of the underlying distinctive competencies. The strategic competitive advantage of an organization must in some way distinguish it from its competitors, therefore we quite reasonably expected to see specific and unique features in the form and content of the annual reports-established tools of social identity construction-for the S&P 500 firms in our random sample. Ironically, a strategic focus on core competencies to create a distinctive competitive advantage can work against adaptive capacity by reducing variety within the organization (Glynn, Barr, & Dacin, 2000).Hence, a possible explanation for the apparent propensity of firms to manufacture standardized corporate identities through their financial disclosures is that many organizations are pursuing variety-reducing strategies to differentiate themselves. In contrast to this strategic orientation, Glynn & Abzug (2002, p. 267) followed an institutional theory frame in arguing that symbolic isomorph ism or ―the resemblance of an organization’s symbolic attributes to those of other organizations within its institutional field‖ conveys legitimacy. Our theoretical contribution beyond those of the two previous research citations was to show that both strategic andsymbolic isomorphism were not confined by industry, inter-organizational, or institutional fields, as our sample was randomly drawn from the entire S&P 500.Therefore, our findings suggest that these theoretical explanations may be insufficient for exploring identity construction. A more expansive secondary socialization (Berger & Luckmann, 1966) model of organizational identity, as indicated by previous research (Hillon & Smith, 2004), may be necessary in order to capture and comprehend a more profound perspective on identity construction through financial narratives and other disclosures of organizational performance. Such an approach could feasibly provide broader theoretical support for the clash of objectives observed in firms pursuing variety-reducing strategies while simultaneously attempting to create distinctive corporate identities.While we initially attempted to analyze the process of corporate identity construction through supplemental footnote disclosures, we now realize that we have only taken a first step toward revealing the true nature of an apparently homogeneous ―boilerplate‖ supplemental disclosure regiment. Additional research to examine the Management Discussion and Analysis (MDA) section of the annual reports may be needed to provide further insight into this identity de-constructing affinity for standardized reporting and information disclosure.Source: Smith, William L Vol.4 Issue 1/2 p120-129, 10p译文:制造企业特性:财务报表附注披露的分析有效执行的财务报告主要是通过财务报表和年度报告或10 - K表格找到的相关补充披露来简化。