财务报表附注披露的分析【外文翻译】
- 格式:doc
- 大小:60.50 KB
- 文档页数:15
财务报表附注英语Financial report notes are additional disclosures that provide detailed information related to the financial statements. These notes are an integral part of any financial statement and provide insight into the financial condition, performance, and cash flow of an organization. The following are some common contents that may be included in financial report notes:1. Accounting Policies: The summary of accounting policies that the organization uses to prepare its financial statements.2. Business Segment Information: A disclosure of revenue, operating profit, and assets by business segment.3. Contingent liabilities: A description of potential liabilities that depend on the occurrence of an uncertain event.4. Depreciation: A detailed breakdown of the methods used to calculate depreciation expense.5. Earnings Per Share (EPS): A calculation of earnings per share for the period.6. Financial Instruments: A comprehensive overview of the financial instruments used in the reporting period, including information on the fair value measurement and the risks involved.7. Goodwill: A detailed valuation of goodwill, along with any impairment charges.8. Inventories: A detailed breakdown of inventory values, including raw materials, work-in-progress, and finished goods.9. Leases: A description of the leased assets and liabilities of the organization.10. Related party transactions: A disclosure of transactions between related parties and the impact on the financial statements.11. Restructuring: A breakdown of the cost associated with restructuring activities, including charges related to employee severance and facility closures.12. Revenue Recognition: A detailed overview of the revenue recognition policies of the organization.Overall, financial report notes provide important context and details to the financial statements that can aid in the interpretation and analysis of the financial health of an organization.。
财务报表附注汉英翻译报告
随着经济全球化进程加速,中国政府鼓励越来越多的中国企业"走出去",寻求国际合作。
在国际合作中,财务报表承担着披露企业经济活动、财务业绩以及经济优势的责任。
因此,好的财务报表翻译尤其重要。
目前,对财务报表的翻译研究主要集中在英汉翻译和词汇翻译两个方面。
本报告基于一份审计报告的汉英翻译实践。
审计报告包括审计意见和财务报表两部分。
翻译实践原文为财务报表附注的部分内容,财务报表附注是财务报表的主要组成部分。
本报告研究了奈达功能对等理论对财务报表翻译的指导作用。
本报告共包括四个部分:第一章介绍了翻译任务以及财务报表;第二章描述了翻译过程,包括译前准备,译中翻译难点以及译后反馈三个部分;第三章首先介绍了功能对等理论和提出翻译过程中所用到的翻译原则;然后通过案例分析,解释了翻译原则及方法的运用;报告最后进行了总结。
研究方法包括举例子和理论解释。
报告希望能为从事财务报表翻译的译者提供一定的参考。
第1篇Executive SummaryThis analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the financial performance of XYZ Corporation over the past fiscal year. By examining the financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, we can gain insights into the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and overall financial health. This report will be presented in both English and Chinese, with key findings and conclusions translated for clarity.I. IntroductionXYZ Corporation, a leading company in the technology industry, has released its financial report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. The report provides a detailed account of the company's financial activities, performance, and position during the period. This analysis will focus on the key financial indicators and ratios, highlighting the company's strengths and weaknesses, and offering recommendations for improvement.II. Financial Statements AnalysisA. Balance SheetThe balance sheet provides a snapshot of the company's financialposition at a specific point in time. The following analysis will focus on the key components of the balance sheet:1. Assets: XYZ Corporation's total assets increased by 15% from the previous fiscal year, driven by a 20% growth in current assets and a 10% increase in non-current assets. This indicates that the company has been successful in expanding its asset base.2. Liabilities: The total liabilities of XYZ Corporation also increased by 12%, with current liabilities growing by 15% and non-currentliabilities by 10%. This suggests that the company has taken on additional debt to finance its growth.3. Equity: The equity of XYZ Corporation increased by 18% over thefiscal year, reflecting the company's profitability and reinvestment in the business.B. Income StatementThe income statement shows the company's revenue, expenses, and net income over a specific period. The following points highlight the key aspects of the income statement:1. Revenue: XYZ Corporation's revenue increased by 20% from the previous fiscal year, driven by strong sales in the technology sector.2. Expenses: The company's expenses increased by 15%, with cost of goods sold (COGS) increasing by 18% and selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) increasing by 12%. This indicates that the company has been able to control its cost of goods sold but has experienced some increases in SG&A expenses.3. Net Income: XYZ Corporation's net income increased by 25% over the fiscal year, reflecting the company's strong operational performance.C. Cash Flow StatementThe cash flow statement provides insights into the company's cashinflows and outflows. The following analysis focuses on the key components of the cash flow statement:1. Operating Cash Flow: XYZ Corporation's operating cash flow increased by 30% over the fiscal year, indicating strong cash-generating capabilities.2. Investing Cash Flow: The company's investing cash flow decreased by 5%, primarily due to lower capital expenditures.3. Financing Cash Flow: Financing cash flow increased by 20%, driven by higher dividends paid to shareholders and an increase in long-term debt.III. Financial Ratios AnalysisA. Liquidity Ratios1. Current Ratio: XYZ Corporation's current ratio increased from 1.5 to 1.8, indicating improved short-term liquidity.2. Quick Ratio: The quick ratio improved from 1.2 to 1.5, suggestingthat the company has a strong ability to meet its short-term obligations.B. Solvency Ratios1. Debt-to-Equity Ratio: The debt-to-equity ratio decreased from 1.2 to 1.0, indicating a more conservative financial structure.2. Interest Coverage Ratio: The interest coverage ratio improved from 5.0 to 6.0, reflecting the company's ability to cover its interest expenses.C. Profitability Ratios1. Gross Profit Margin: The gross profit margin remained stable at 40%, indicating efficient cost management.2. Net Profit Margin: The net profit margin increased from 15% to 20%, reflecting the company's improved profitability.IV. ConclusionXYZ Corporation has demonstrated strong financial performance over the past fiscal year, with significant growth in revenue, net income, and operating cash flow. The company's liquidity and solvency ratios are also healthy, indicating a strong financial position. However, there are areas of concern, such as the increase in SG&A expenses and the need to manage long-term debt.V. Recommendations1. Cost Control: XYZ Corporation should focus on managing SG&A expenses to improve profitability.2. Debt Management: The company should consider strategies to manage long-term debt, such as refinancing or paying down existing debt.3. Investment in Research and Development: Investing in research and development can help the company stay competitive in the technology industry.VI. 中文摘要本报告旨在全面分析XYZ公司过去一个财年的财务表现。
****** CO., LTDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013(All amounts in RMB Yuan)I. Company Profile******* Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") is a limited liability company (Sino-foreign joint venture) jointly invested and established by **** Co., Ltd. and ******* Limited on 24 June 2013. On December 26, 2013, the shareholders have been changed to ***** CO., LTD and ******* LIMITED.Business License of Enterprise Legal Person License No.:Legal Representative:Registered Capital: RMB (Paid-in Capital: RMB )Address:Business Scope: Financing and leasing business; leasing business; purchase of leased property from home and abroad; residue value treatment and maintenance of leased property; consulting and guarantees of lease transaction (articles involved in the industry license management would be dealt in terms of national relevant stipulations) II. Declaration on following Accounting Standard for Business EnterprisesThe financial statements made by the Company are in accordance with the requirements of Accounting Standard for Business Enterprises, which reflects the financial position, financial performance and cash flow of the Company truly and completely.III. Basic of preparation of financial statementsThe Company implements the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises (,Finance and Accounting [2006] No. 3”) issued by the Ministry of Finance on February 15, 2006 and the successive regulations. The Company prepares its financial statements on a going concern basis, and recognizes and measures i ts accounting items in compliance with the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises – Basic Standards and other relevant accounting standards, application guidelines and criteria for interpretation of provisions as well as the significant accounting policies and accounting estimates on the basis of actual transactions and events.IV. The main accounting policies, accounting estimates and changesFiscal yearThe Company adopts the calendar year as its fiscal year from January 1 to December 31.Functional currencyRMB was the functional currency of the Company.Accounting measurement attributeThe Company adopts the accrual basis for accounting treatments and double-entry bookkeeping of borrowing for financial accounting. The historical cost is generally as the measurement attribute, and when accounting elements determined are in line with the requirements of Accounting Standards for Enterprises and can be reliably measured, t he replacement cost, net realizable value and fair value can be used for measurement.Accounting method of foreign currency transactionsThe Company?s foreign currency transactions adopt approximate spot exchange rate of the transaction date to convert into RMB in accordance with systematic and rational method; on the balance sheet date, the foreign currency monetary items use the spot exchange rate of the balance sheet date. All balances of exchange arising from differences between the balance sheet date spot exchange rate and the initial recognition or the former balance sheet date spot exchange rate, except that the exchange gains and losses arising by borrowing foreign currency for the construction or production of assets e ligible for capitalization are transacted i n accordance w ith capitalization principles, are included in profit or loss in this period; the foreign currency non-monetary items measured at historical cost will still be converted with the spot exchange rate of the transaction date.The standard for recognizing cash equivalentWhen making the cash flow statement, cash on hand and deposits readily to be paid will be recognized as cash, and short-term (usually no more than three months), highly liquid and readily convertible to known amounts of cash with insignificant riskof changes in value are recognized as cash equivalent.Financial InstrumentsClassification, recognition and measurement of financial assets- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial assets divides it into the following four categories: financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period, loans and receivables, financial assets available for sale and held-to-maturity investments. Financial assets are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other categories of financial assets are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period refer to the short-term sales financial assets, including financial assets held for trading or financial assets measured at fair value with changes i ncluded in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition by the management. Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are subsequently measured at fair value, and the interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value at the end of this period are recognized in the profit or loss in this period. When it is disposed, the difference between the fair value and the initial recorded amount is recognized as investment income, while adjusting gains from changes in the fair value.--Loans and receivables: the non-derivative financial assets w ithout the price in an active market and with fixed and determinable recovery cost are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent measurement, and gains or losses arising from derecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.-- Financial assets available for sale: including non-derivative financial assets available for sale recognized initially and other non-derivative financial assets except for loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments and trading financial assets. Financial assets available for sale are subsequently measured at fair value, and interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and gains or losses arising from the changes in fair value at the end of this period are recognized directly in owners' equity until the financial asset is derecognized or impaired and then is recognized as the profit or loss in this period.-- Held-to-maturity investments: the non-derivative financial assets with clear intention and ability to hold to maturity by the management of the company, a fixed maturity date and fixed or determinable payments are classified as held-to-maturity investments. Held-to-maturity investments adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent m easurement, a nd gains or losses arising from derecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.Classification, recognition and measurement of financial liabilities- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial liabilities divides it intothe following two categories: financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period and other financial liabilities. Financial liabilities are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profitor loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other financial liabilities are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial liabilities measured a t fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period include the trading financial liabilities and financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition. Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at fair value, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value are recognized in the profit or loss in this period.-- Other financial liabilities: adopting the effective interest method and taking amortized cost for subsequent measurement. The gains or losses arising from derecognition or amortization is included in the profit or loss of this period. Requirements for derecognition of financial liabilitiesFinancial liabilities shall be entirely or partially derecognized if the present obligations derived from them are entirely or partially discharged. Where the Company enters into an agreement with a creditor so as to substitute the current financial liabilities with new ones, and the contract clauses of which are substantially different from those of the current ones, it shall recognize the new financial liabilitiesin place of the current ones. Where substantial revisions are made to some or all of the contract clauses of the current financial liabilities, the Company shall recognize the new financial liabilities after revision of the contract clauses in place of the currentones entirely or partially.Upon entire or partial derecognition of financial liabilities, differences between thecarrying amounts of the derecognized financial liabilities and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered or new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period.Where the Company redeems part of its financial liabilities, it shall allocate the carrying amounts of the entire financial liabilities between the relative fair values ofthe parts that continue to be recognized and the derecognized parts on the redemption date. Differences between the carrying amounts allocated to the derecognized parts and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered and the new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period. Recognition and measurement for transfer of financial assetsIf the Company has transferred nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets t o the transferee, they shall be derecognized. I f it retains nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets, they shall not be derecognized and will be recognized as a financial liability. If the Company has not transferred nor retained nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets:(1) to give up the control of the financial assets to be derecognized; (2) not giving up control of the financial asset to be recognized based on the extent of its continuing involvement in the transferred financial assets and liabilities are recognized accordingly.If the transfer of entire financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, differences between the amounts of the following two items shall be recognized in profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amount of the transferred financial asset; (2) the aggregate consideration received from the transfer plus the cumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values originally recognized in the owners? equity. If the partial transfer of financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, the carrying amounts of the entire financial assets transferred shall be split into the derecognized and recognized parts according to their respective fair values and differences between the amounts of the following two items are charged to profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amounts of the derecognized parts;(2) The aggregate consideration for the derecognized parts plus the portion of the accumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values of the derecognized parts which are originally recognized in the owners? equity.Determination of the fair value of financial instruments- If financial instruments trade in an active market, the quoted price in an active market determines its fair value; if financial instrument trade not in an active market, the valuation techniques determine the fair value. Valuation techniques include recent market transaction price reference to the familiar situation and volunteer transaction, current fair value reference to other substantially similar financial instruments, discounted cash flow method and option pricing model and so on.Test and Provisions for impairment loss on financial assets--Except trading financial assets, the Company makes assessment o n the carrying values of financial assets at the balance sheet date. If there is evidence that the fair value of specific financial asset has been impaired, provisions for impairment loss is made accordingly.-- Measurement of impairment of financial assets measured at amortized costIf there is objective evidence that the financial asset measured at amortized cost has been impaired, the carrying amount of the financial asset is written down to the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not yet occurred), and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the profit or loss of this period. The Company carries out the impairment test of significant single financial asset separately, carries out the impairment test on insignificant single financial asset from a single or combination of angles, and carries out the impairment test on single asset without objective evidence of impairment along with the financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics to constitute a combination, but does not carry out the impairment test on the provisionfor impairment of financial assets based on the single in the portfolio. In the subsequent period, if there is objective evidence that the value of financial asset has been restored and recognized relevant to the objective matters occurring after the impairment, previously recognized impairment loss shall be reversed and charged into the profit or loss of this period. But the book value after the reversal should not exceed the amortized cost at the reversal date of the financial assets supposed no provision for impairment. When the financial assets measured at amortized cost actually occur loss, offset against the related provision for impairment.--Available for sale financial assetsIf there is objective evidence that an impairment of available for sale financial assets occurs, even though the financial asset has not been derecognised, the cumulative loss of decrease o f the faire value originally recorded in the owner's equity should be transferred out and charged into the current profit and loss. The cumulative loss is the initial acquisition cost of available for sale financial assets, deducting the fair value of the withdrawing principal and amortization amount and impairment loss as well as net impairment amount originally charged into the profit or loss.Recognition and provision for bad debts of accounts receivableIf there is objective evidence that receivables are impaired at the end of this period,the carrying value will be written down to its present value of estimated future cash flows, and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the current profit or loss. Present value of estimated future cash flows is determined through future cash flows (excluding credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the original effective interest rate, taking into account the value of related collateral (less estimated disposal costs, etc.). Original effective interest rate is the actual interest rate when the receivables are recognized initially. The estimated future cash flows of short-term receivables have small difference from the present value, and the estimated future cash flows are not discounted in determining the related impairment loss.The significant single receivables are separately carried out impairment test at the end of this period, and if there is objective evidence that the impairment has occurred, based on the difference of the present value of future cash flows less than the book value, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision of bad debts is done. The significant single amount refers to top five receivable balances or the sum ofpayments accounting for more than 10% of receivable balances.If there is objective evidence that the individual non-significant receivables impairment has occurred, separate impairment test is done, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision for bad debts is done; other individual non-significant receivables and receivables not impaired after separate test are together divided into several combinations for impairment testing with aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, to determine the impairment loss and do provision for bad debts.In addition to separate provision for impairment of receivables, the company is based on the actual loss rate of receivable portfolio with the same or similar to the previous year and aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, and combines the current situation to determine the ratio of provision for bad debts as follows:Aging Ratio of provisionWithin one year 5%1 –2 years 20%2 –3 years 50%Over 3 years 80%Fixed assets and depreciation accounting methodRecognition criteria of fixed assets: fixed assets refer to tangible assets held for the purpose of producing commodities, providing services, renting or business management with useful lives exceeding one accounting year and high unit value. Classification of fixed assets: buildings and constructions, machinery equipment, transport equipment and office equipment.Fixed assets pricing and depreciation method: the fixed assets is priced based on actual cost and depreciated in a straight-line method. The estimated useful lives, estimated residual rate and annual depreciation rate of various categories of fixed assets are listed as follows:Category of fixed assets Estimateduseful lives(year)Estimated residualrate (year)Annualdepreciation rate(%)Buildings andconstructions20 10 4.5machinery equipment 10 5 9.5transport equipment 5 5 19office equipment 5 5 19Impairment of fixed assets: the Company checks the fixed assets term by term at the end of the reporting period, and if the market continuing to fall or technological obsolescence, damage, long-term idle and other reasons result in fixed assets recoverable amount lower than its book value, in accordance with the difference provision for impairment of fixed assets, the impairment loss is recognized in fixed assets a nd can not be reversed in a subsequent a ccounting period. The recoverable amount is recognized based on the fair value of the assets deducting the net amount after disposal expenses a nd the present value of cash flows of the estimated future assets. The present value of the future cash flows of the asset is determined in accordance with the resulting estimated future cash flows in the process of continuoususe and final disposal to select its appropriate discount rate and the amount of the discount.Accounting method of construction in progressThe construction in progress is priced on the actual cost, to temporarily transfer to fixed assets when reaching the intended use state in accordance with the project budget and the actual cost of the project, and to adjust the book value of fixed assets according to the actual cost after handling final settlement of accounts. Acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or the interest on general borrowing costs and auxiliary expenses of specific borrowings occurred can be included in the cost of capital assets and subsequently recognized in the current profit or loss before the acquisition, construction or production of the qualifying asset reaches the intended use state or the sale state.Impairment of construction in progress: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection of construction in progress at the end of the reporting period; if the construction in process is stopped for long time and will not be constructed in the next three years and the construction in progress brings great uncertainty to the economic benefits of enterprises due to backward performance or techniques and the construction in progress occurs impairment, the balance of recoverable amount of single construction in progress lower than the book value of construction in progressis for impairment provisions of construction in progress. Impairment loss on the construction in progress shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.The pricing and amortizing of intangible assetsPricing of the intangible assets---The cost of outsourcing intangible assets shall be priced based on the actual expenditure directly attributable to intangible assets for the expected purpose.--- Expenditure on internal research and development projects is charged into the current profit or loss, and expense in the development stage can be recognized as intangible costs if meeting the criteria for capitalization.--- Intangible assets of investment is in accordance with the agreed value of the investment contract or agreement as costs, excluding not fair agreed value of the contract or agreement.--- Intangible assets of the debtor obtained in the non-cash asset cover debt method can be accepted; if the receivable creditor?s right is changed into intangible assets, then record according to the fair value of intangible assets.--- For non-monetary transaction intangible assets, t he fair value and related taxes payable of non-monetary assets should be the accounting cost.Amortization of intangible assets: as for the intangible assets with limited service life, it is amortized by straight-line method when it is available for use within the service period. As for unforeseeable period of intangible assets bringing future economic benefits to the company, it is regarded as intangible assets with uncertain service life, and intangible assets with uncertain service life can not be amortized. The Company?s intangible assets include land use rights, forest land use rights and the production and marketing information management software. The land use rights are amortizedaveragely in accordance with 50 years of service life, forest land use rights are amortized averagely in accordance with 30 years of service life, and the production and marketing information management software are amortized averagely in accordance with 5 years of service life.Expenditures arising from development phase on internal research and development projects can be recognized as intangible assets w hen satisfying all of the following conditions: (1) there is technical feasibility of completing the intangible assets so that they will be available for use or sale; (2) there is intention to complete and use or sell the intangible assets; (3) the method that the intangible assets g enerate economic benefits, including existence of a market for products produced by the intangible assets or for the intangible assets themselves, shall be proved. Or, if to be used internally, the usefulness of the intangible assets shall be proved; (4) adequate technical, financial, and other resources are available to complete the development of intangible assets, and the Company has the ability to use or sell the intangible assets;(5) the expenditures arising from development phase of the intangible assets can be measured reliably.Impairment of intangible assets: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection on intangible assets a t the end of the reporting period. If the intangible assets h ave been replaced by other new technologies so as to seriously affect its capacity to create economic benefits for the enterprise, the market value of certain intangible assets sharply fall and is not expected to recover in the remaining amortization period, certain intangible asset has exceeded the legal time limit but still has some value in use as well as the intangible asset impairment has occurred, the provision for impairment is done according to the difference between the individual estimated recoverable amount and the book value. Impairment loss on the intangible asset shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.Accounting method of capitalization of borrowing costsBorrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization should be charged into the relevant costs of assets and therefore should be capitalized. Borrowing costs incurred after qualifying assets for capitalization reaches the estimated use state are charged to profit or loss in the current period. Other borrowing costs are recognized as expenses based on the accrual and are charged to profit or loss in the current period.Capitalization of borrowing costs should meet the following conditions: expenditures are being incurred, which comprise disbursements incurred in the form of paymentsof cash, transfer of non-monetary assets o r assumption of interest-bearing debts for the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization; borrowing costs are being incurred; purchase, construction or manufacturing activities that are necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use or sale are in progress. Capitalization amount of borrowing interest: the borrowing interest incurred from the acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or generally should be determined the capitalization amount according to the following method before the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset reaching its intended use or sale state:---Where funds are borrowed specifically for purchase, construction or manufacturingof assets eligible for capitalization, costs eligible for capitalization are the actual interest costs incurred in current period less the interest income of unused borrowing funds deposited in the bank or any income earned on the temporary investment of such borrowings.---Where funds allocated for purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization are part of a general pool, the eligible capitalization interest amounts are determined by multiplying a capitalization rate of general borrowing bythe weighted average of accumulated capital expenditures over those on specific borrowings. The capitalization rate will be determined based on the weighted average rate of the borrowing costs applicable to the general pool.Suspension for capitalization: Capitalization of borrowing costs should be suspended during periods in which purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization is interrupted abnormally with the interruption time exceeding three months continuously. Borrowing costs incurred during the interruption should be charged to profit or loss for the current period, and should continue to be capitalized when purchase, construction or manufacturing of the relevant assets resumes. If the interruption is the necessary procedure to prepare the assets purchased, constructed or manufactured eligible for capitalization for their intended use or sale, the borrowing costs should continue to be capitalized.Recognition criteria and measurement method of estimated liabilities Recognition criteria of estimated liabilities: when the external security, pending litigation or arbitration, product quality assurance, layoffs, loss of contracts, restructuring obligations, fixed asset retirement obligations and other pertinent business meet the following conditions, it can be recognized as the liability: (1) the obligation is a present obligation of the Company; (2)it is probable that settlement of such an obligation will result in the economic benefit to flow out from the Company; (3) the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably.Measurement method of estimated liabilities: The Company?s estimated liabilities shall be initially measured at the best estimates of the necessary expenditures for the fulfillment of the present obligations. To determine the best estimates, the Company shall take into full account the risks, uncertainties, time value of money, and other factors relating to the contingencies. If the time value of money is significant, the best estimates shall be determined after discounting the relevant future cash outflows. If there is a continuous range for the necessary expenses, and probabilities of occurrence of all the outcomes within this range are equal, the best estimate shall be determinedat the average amount within the range. The best estimates shall be determined as follows in other circumstances: (1) if the contingency involves a single item, the best estimate shall be determined at the most likely outcome; (2) if the contingency involves two or more items, the best estimate should be determined according to allthe possible outcomes with their relevant probabilities; (3) when all or part of the expenses necessary f or the settlement of estimated liabilities of the Company are expected to be compensated by a third parties, the compensations should be separately recognized as assets only when it is virtually certain that the compensations will be。
《国际会计准则指南》英文词汇本词汇表涵盖了国际会计准则委员会的词汇表,经许可包括在其中。
同时也包括在其他会计文献中出现的会计术语。
读者应注意:如果要求给出某一术语的准确定义,特别是当上下文可能影响对特定词汇的理解,应阅读特定准则。
译文中的黑体字表明该术语已在本词汇表中其他地方给已定义。
Absorption costing摊配成本计算法:是一种在存货的成本中包括一定比例的变动成本和固定成本的计算方法。
固定成本的分摊以正常营运能力为基础。
Accounting concepts会计概念指企业编制财务报表(Financial Statement)所依据的基本假设。
Accounting income会计收益指损益表中所列示的某一会计期间的总收益(Income)或亏损(Loss),包括非常项目(Extraordinary),但未扣除所得税费用或加上所得税节省。
Accounting method会计方法见会计程序(Accounting Procedure)。
Accounting policies会计政策指企业编制财务报表(Financial Statement)时所采用的特定原则、基础、惯例、规则和做法。
Accounting principles会计原则是关于经济信息的计量、分类和说明以及通过财务报表(Financial Statement)传递企业财务成果时的指导原则。
Accounting procedures会计程序企业应用会计原则(Accounting Principle)时所采用的方法。
Accounting profit会计利润某一会计期间未扣减所得税之前的净收益或净亏损。
Accounting standards会计准则经准则制定机构正式确认的会计原则(Accounting Principle)。
Accounts payable应付帐款指因购买商品或接受劳务而应支付给其他企业的货币性负债(Liability)。
本科毕业论文(设计)外文翻译外文题目 The value-relevance of financial statementrecognition versus note disclosure: evidencefrom goodwill accounting外文出处European Accounting Review,2009(1) :123-140 外文作者Al Jifri, khaled Citron, David原文:The Value-Relevance of Financial Statement Recognition Versus NoteDisclosure: Evidence From Goodwill AccountingABSTRACT The relative significance of financial statement recognition andnote disclosure is an important issue for accounting regulators, preparers and auditors.While standard-setters priorities financial recognition over disclosure, the empiricalevidence on the value-relevance of note disclosures is mixed. This is partly due to thesevere methodological problems inherent in comparing the two modes of presentation.This paper examines this issue in a new context by exploiting the UK regulatoryenvironment where old pre-FRS 10 goodwill continues to be disclosed in the notesto the accounts at the same time as new post-FRS 10 goodwill is capitalized. It thususes a within-firm research method to examine the relative significance of the twogoodwill amounts. The analysis is based on a sample of 243 non-financial firmscontaining amounts of both recognized and disclosed goodwill in their 2002 financialstatements. Both variables are significantly associated with share price. In addition,for firms engaging in R&D, there is no significant difference between thecontributions of disclosed and recognized goodwill in explaining market value, aresult consistent with the markets efficiently incorporating goodwill informationirrespective of where it appears in the annual report.This paper examines whether the market values goodwill disclosed only in the notes to the accounts equivalently to goodwill recognized in the balance sheet. It exploits the unique UK regulatory framework in which accounting for goodwill moved from note disclosure to balance sheet recognition. This context enables the study to contribute to the recognition vs. disclosure debate without encountering the self-selection bias introduced when firms have a choice about the reporting method or the influence of contemporaneous events if recognized and disclosed amounts are observed at different points in time.This issue is important for a number of reasons. Firstly, the question as to whether share prices reflect amounts disclosed in the notes and those recognized in the financial statements similarly, as would be expected in efficient markets, is of interest to regulators, accounts preparers and auditors. In this connection, regulators appear to priorities recognition over disclosure. Thus the UK Accounting Standards Board’s conceptual framework favors recognition when it states:” ... disclosure of information in the notes is not a substitute for recognition and does not correct or justify any misrepresentation in or omission from the primary financial statements’(ASB,1999,para.7.5).Si milarly, in its conceptual framework the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board)states that note disclosure is not a substitute for financial statement recognition (Alfredson et al. , 2005);and in the USA the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board)has argued, in the context of accounting for post-retirement benefits, that disclosure is not a substitute for recognition (SFAS No.106,para.164,cited by Davis-Friday etal. , 1999). On the other hand, as Schipper (2007) points out, these comments in t he regulators’ conceptual framework documents neither set out the conceptual role of mandatory disclosures nor do they provide clear guidance as to the fundamental distinction between disclosure and recognition. Efficient markets theory does suggest that the markets adopt a substance over form approach and incorporate all publicly available information, irrespective of the mode of disclosure. However, there are conditions under which note disclosures are less strongly associated with market values (Bernard and Schipper, 1994; Davis-Friday et al., 1999; Ahmed et al., 2006). One of these is ifinvestors inappropriately undervalue disclosed amounts either through lack of expertise or due to the cost of processing note information. Secondly, recognition may imply greater relevance or reliability, in which case users correctly assign lower weight to disclosed amounts. For example, auditors or management may require more stringent standards for recognized values. In the absence of a clear theory relating to disclosures, this paper seeks to provide empirical evidence as to whether these two modes of reporting have a differential effect on share prices.Secondly, goodwill accounting is itself a controversial issue, with standard setters changing required accounting methods on a regular basis. Many studies have investigated the value-relevance of recognized goodwill amounts (for example, McCarthy and Schneider, 1995; Barth and Clinch, 1996; Jennings et al., 1996; Godfrey and Koh, 2001). More recently the introduction of SFAS 142 (FASB, 2001) in the USA has triggered research into whether the new standard has improved the reliability of recognized goodwill amounts. Results are mixed with Ahmed and Guler (2007) finding that it has while Chambers (2007) has contrary results. Other studies (e.g. Beatty and Weber, 2006; Guler, 2007) find that management incentives and corporate governance structures affect the recognition of impairment charges under SFAS 142. While these studies have focused on the value-relevance of goodwill recognized on the face of the financial statements, this paper investigates whether accounting for goodwill via note disclosure vs. financial statement recognition affects investors’ decisions, a feature of goodwill accounting not examined hitherto.The paper addresses some key methodological problems inherent in researching this issue. It examines the differential market valuation of goodwill in the notes vs. that in the balance sheet in a context in which firms, firstly, had no choice about the method of reporting, thus eliminating the self-selection problem; secondly, in which both sets of amounts are reported at the same time so that differences in contemporaneous disclosures do not distort the results; and thirdly, by addressing, if only partially, potential differential reliability of disclosed and recognized amounts。
****** CO., LTDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013(All amounts in RMB Yuan) I. Company Profile******* Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") is a limited liability company (Sino-foreign joint venture) jointly invested and established by **** Co., Ltd. and ******* Limited on 24 June 2013. On December 26, 2013, the shareholders have been changed to ***** CO., LTD and ******* LIMITED.Business License of Enterprise Legal Person License No.:Legal Representative:Registered Capital: RMB (Paid-in Capital: RMB )Address:Business Scope: Financing and leasing business; leasing business; purchase of leased property from home and abroad; residue value treatment and maintenance of leased property; consulting and guarantees of lease transaction (articles involved in the industry license management would be dealt in terms of national relevant stipulations) II. Declaration on following Accounting Standard for Business EnterprisesThe financial statements made by the Company are in accordance with the requirements of Accounting Standard for Business Enterprises, which reflects the financial position, financial performance and cash flow of the Company truly and completely.III. Basic of preparation of financial statementsThe Company implements the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises(‘Finance and Accounting [2006] No. 3”) issued by the Ministry of Finance on February 15, 2006 and the successive regulations. The Company prepares its financial statements on a going concern basis, and recognizes and measures its accounting items in compliance with the Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises – Basic Standards and other relevant accounting standards, application guidelines and criteria for interpretation of provisions as well as the significant accounting policies and accounting estimates on the basis of actual transactions and events.IV. The main accounting policies, accounting estimates and changesFiscal yearThe Company adopts the calendar year as its fiscal year from January 1 to December 31.Functional currencyRMB was the functional currency of the Company.Accounting measurement attributeThe Company adopts the accrual basis for accounting treatments and double-entry bookkeeping of borrowing for financial accounting. The historical cost is generally as the measurement attribute, and when accounting elements determined are in line with the requirements of Accounting Standards for Enterprises and can be reliablymeasured, the replacement cost, net realizable value and fair value can be used for measurement.Accounting method of foreign currency transactionsThe Company’s fo reign currency transactions adopt approximate spot exchange rate of the transaction date to convert into RMB in accordance with systematic and rational method; on the balance sheet date, the foreign currency monetary items use the spot exchange rate of the balance sheet date. All balances of exchange arising from differences between the balance sheet date spot exchange rate and the initial recognition or the former balance sheet date spot exchange rate, except that the exchange gains and losses arising by borrowing foreign currency for the construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization are transacted in accordance with capitalization principles, are included in profit or loss in this period; the foreign currency non-monetary items measured at historical cost will still be converted with the spot exchange rate of the transaction date.The standard for recognizing cash equivalentWhen making the cash flow statement, cash on hand and deposits readily to be paid will be recognized as cash, and short-term (usually no more than three months), highly liquid and readily convertible to known amounts of cash with insignificant risk of changes in value are recognized as cash equivalent.Financial InstrumentsClassification, recognition and measurement of financial assets- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial assets divides it into the following four categories: financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period, loans and receivables, financial assets available for sale and held-to-maturity investments. Financial assets are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other categories of financial assets are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period refer to the short-term sales financial assets, including financial assets held for trading or financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition by the management. Financial assets measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are subsequently measured at fair value, and the interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value at the end of this period are recognized in the profit or loss in this period. When it is disposed, the difference between the fair value and the initial recorded amount is recognized as investment income, while adjusting gains from changes in the fair value.--Loans and receivables: the non-derivative financial assets without the price in an active market and with fixed and determinable recovery cost are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent measurement, and gains or losses arising fromderecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.-- Financial assets available for sale: including non-derivative financial assets available for sale recognized initially and other non-derivative financial assets except for loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments and trading financial assets. Financial assets available for sale are subsequently measured at fair value, and interest or cash dividends obtained during the holding period will be recognized as investment income, and gains or losses arising from the changes in fair value at the end of this period are recognized directly in owners' equity until the financial asset is derecognized or impaired and then is recognized as the profit or loss in this period.-- Held-to-maturity investments: the non-derivative financial assets with clear intention and ability to hold to maturity by the management of the company, a fixed maturity date and fixed or determinable payments are classified as held-to-maturity investments. Held-to-maturity investments adopt the effective interest method and take amortized cost for subsequent measurement, and gains or losses arising from derecognition, impairment or amortization are included in the profit or loss of this period.Classification, recognition and measurement of financial liabilities- The company at the time of initial recognition of financial liabilities divides it into the following two categories: financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period and other financial liabilities. Financial liabilities are measured at fair value when initially recognized. Relevant transaction costs of financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period are recognized in profit or loss of this period, and relevant transaction costs of other financial liabilities are recognized in the amount initially recognized.-- Financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period include the trading financial liabilities and financial liabilities measured at fair value with changes included in the profit or loss of this period designated upon initial recognition. Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at fair value, and the gains or losses of the change in fair value are recognized in the profit or loss in this period.-- Other financial liabilities: adopting the effective interest method and taking amortized cost for subsequent measurement. The gains or losses arising from derecognition or amortization is included in the profit or loss of this period. Requirements for derecognition of financial liabilitiesFinancial liabilities shall be entirely or partially derecognized if the present obligations derived from them are entirely or partially discharged. Where the Company enters into an agreement with a creditor so as to substitute the current financial liabilities with new ones, and the contract clauses of which are substantially different from those of the current ones, it shall recognize the new financial liabilities in place of the current ones. Where substantial revisions are made to some or all of the contract clauses of the current financial liabilities, the Company shall recognize thenew financial liabilities after revision of the contract clauses in place of the current ones entirely or partially.Upon entire or partial derecognition of financial liabilities, differences between the carrying amounts of the derecognized financial liabilities and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered or new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period.Where the Company redeems part of its financial liabilities, it shall allocate the carrying amounts of the entire financial liabilities between the relative fair values of the parts that continue to be recognized and the derecognized parts on the redemption date. Differences between the carrying amounts allocated to the derecognized parts and the consideration paid (including non-monetary assets surrendered and the new financial liabilities assumed) are charged to profit or loss for the current period. Recognition and measurement for transfer of financial assetsIf the Company has transferred nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets to the transferee, they shall be derecognized. If it retains nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets, they shall not be derecognized and will be recognized as a financial liability. If the Company has not transferred nor retained nearly all of the risks and rewards relating to the ownership of the financial assets:(1) to give up the control of the financial assets to be derecognized; (2) not giving up control of the financial asset to be recognized based on the extent of its continuing involvement in the transferred financial assets and liabilities are recognized accordingly.If the transfer of entire financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, differences between the amounts of the following two items shall be recognized in profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amount of the transferred financial asset; (2) the aggregate consideration received from the transfer plus the cumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values originally recognized in the owners’ equity. If the partial transfer of financial assets satisfy the criteria for derecognition, the carrying amounts of the entire financial assets transferred shall be split into the derecognized and recognized parts according to their respective fair values and differences between the amounts of the following two items are charged to profit or loss for the current period: (1) the carrying amounts of the derecognized parts;(2) The aggregate consideration for the derecognized parts plus the portion of the accumulative amounts of the changes in the fair values of the derecognized parts which are originally recognized in the owners’ equity.Determination of the fair value of financial instruments- If financial instruments trade in an active market, the quoted price in an active market determines its fair value; if financial instrument trade not in an active market, the valuation techniques determine the fair value. Valuation techniques include recent market transaction price reference to the familiar situation and volunteer transaction, current fair value reference to other substantially similar financial instruments, discounted cash flow method and option pricing model and so on.Test and Provisions for impairment loss on financial assets--Except trading financial assets, the Company makes assessment on the carrying values of financial assets at the balance sheet date. If there is evidence that the fair value of specific financial asset has been impaired, provisions for impairment loss is made accordingly.-- Measurement of impairment of financial assets measured at amortized costIf there is objective evidence that the financial asset measured at amortized cost has been impaired, the carrying amount of the financial asset is written down to the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not yet occurred), and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the profit or loss of this period. The Company carries out the impairment test of significant single financial asset separately, carries out the impairment test on insignificant single financial asset from a single or combination of angles, and carries out the impairment test on single asset without objective evidence of impairment along with the financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics to constitute a combination, but does not carry out the impairment test on the provision for impairment of financial assets based on the single in the portfolio. In the subsequent period, if there is objective evidence that the value of financial asset has been restored and recognized relevant to the objective matters occurring after the impairment, previously recognized impairment loss shall be reversed and charged into the profit or loss of this period. But the book value after the reversal should not exceed the amortized cost at the reversal date of the financial assets supposed no provision for impairment. When the financial assets measured at amortized cost actually occur loss, offset against the related provision for impairment.--Available for sale financial assetsIf there is objective evidence that an impairment of available for sale financial assets occurs, even though the financial asset has not been derecognised, the cumulative loss of decrease of the faire value originally recorded in the owner's equity should be transferred out and charged into the current profit and loss. The cumulative loss is the initial acquisition cost of available for sale financial assets, deducting the fair value of the withdrawing principal and amortization amount and impairment loss as well as net impairment amount originally charged into the profit or loss.Recognition and provision for bad debts of accounts receivableIf there is objective evidence that receivables are impaired at the end of this period, the carrying value will be written down to its present value of estimated future cash flows, and the amount of reduction is recognized as impairment loss and is recognized in the current profit or loss. Present value of estimated future cash flows is determined through future cash flows (excluding credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the original effective interest rate, taking into account the value of related collateral (less estimated disposal costs, etc.). Original effective interest rate is the actual interest rate when the receivables are recognized initially. The estimated future cash flows of short-term receivables have small difference from the present value, and the estimated future cash flows are not discounted in determining the related impairment loss.The significant single receivables are separately carried out impairment test at the end of this period, and if there is objective evidence that the impairment has occurred, based on the difference of the present value of future cash flows less than the book value, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision of bad debts is done. The significant single amount refers to top five receivable balances or the sum of payments accounting for more than 10% of receivable balances.If there is objective evidence that the individual non-significant receivables impairment has occurred, separate impairment test is done, the impairment loss is recognized and the provision for bad debts is done; other individual non-significant receivables and receivables not impaired after separate test are together divided into several combinations for impairment testing with aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, to determine the impairment loss and do provision for bad debts.In addition to separate provision for impairment of receivables, the company is based on the actual loss rate of receivable portfolio with the same or similar to the previous year and aging as the similar credit risk characteristics, and combines the currentFixed assets and depreciation accounting methodRecognition criteria of fixed assets: fixed assets refer to tangible assets held for the purpose of producing commodities, providing services, renting or business management with useful lives exceeding one accounting year and high unit value. Classification of fixed assets: buildings and constructions, machinery equipment, transport equipment and office equipment.Fixed assets pricing and depreciation method: the fixed assets is priced based on actual cost and depreciated in a straight-line method. The estimated useful lives, estimated residual rate and annual depreciation rate of various categories of fixedend of the reporting period, and if the market continuing to fall or technological obsolescence, damage, long-term idle and other reasons result in fixed assets recoverable amount lower than its book value, in accordance with the difference provision for impairment of fixed assets, the impairment loss is recognized in fixedassets and can not be reversed in a subsequent accounting period. The recoverable amount is recognized based on the fair value of the assets deducting the net amount after disposal expenses and the present value of cash flows of the estimated future assets. The present value of the future cash flows of the asset is determined in accordance with the resulting estimated future cash flows in the process of continuous use and final disposal to select its appropriate discount rate and the amount of the discount.Accounting method of construction in progressThe construction in progress is priced on the actual cost, to temporarily transfer to fixed assets when reaching the intended use state in accordance with the project budget and the actual cost of the project, and to adjust the book value of fixed assets according to the actual cost after handling final settlement of accounts. Acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or the interest on general borrowing costs and auxiliary expenses of specific borrowings occurred can be included in the cost of capital assets and subsequently recognized in the current profit or loss before the acquisition, construction or production of the qualifying asset reaches the intended use state or the sale state.Impairment of construction in progress: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection of construction in progress at the end of the reporting period; if the construction in process is stopped for long time and will not be constructed in the next three years and the construction in progress brings great uncertainty to the economic benefits of enterprises due to backward performance or techniques and the construction in progress occurs impairment, the balance of recoverable amount of single construction in progress lower than the book value of construction in progress is for impairment provisions of construction in progress. Impairment loss on the construction in progress shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.The pricing and amortizing of intangible assetsPricing of the intangible assets---The cost of outsourcing intangible assets shall be priced based on the actual expenditure directly attributable to intangible assets for the expected purpose.--- Expenditure on internal research and development projects is charged into the current profit or loss, and expense in the development stage can be recognized as intangible costs if meeting the criteria for capitalization.--- Intangible assets of investment is in accordance with the agreed value of the investment contract or agreement as costs, excluding not fair agreed value of the contract or agreement.--- Intangible assets of the debtor obtained in the non-cash asset cover debt method can be accepted; if the receivable creditor’s right is changed into intangible assets, then record according to the fair value of intangible assets.--- For non-monetary transaction intangible assets, the fair value and related taxes payable of non-monetary assets should be the accounting cost.Amortization of intangible assets: as for the intangible assets with limited service life, it is amortized by straight-line method when it is available for use within the serviceperiod. As for unforeseeable period of intangible assets bringing future economic benefits to the company, it is regarded as intangible assets with uncertain service life, and intangible assets with uncertain service life can not be amortized. The Company’s intangible assets include land use rights, forest land use rights and the production and marketing information management software. The land use rights are amortized averagely in accordance with 50 years of service life, forest land use rights are amortized averagely in accordance with 30 years of service life, and the production and marketing information management software are amortized averagely in accordance with 5 years of service life.Expenditures arising from development phase on internal research and development projects can be recognized as intangible assets when satisfying all of the following conditions: (1) there is technical feasibility of completing the intangible assets so that they will be available for use or sale; (2) there is intention to complete and use or sell the intangible assets; (3) the method that the intangible assets generate economic benefits, including existence of a market for products produced by the intangible assets or for the intangible assets themselves, shall be proved. Or, if to be used internally, the usefulness of the intangible assets shall be proved; (4) adequate technical, financial, and other resources are available to complete the development of intangible assets, and the Company has the ability to use or sell the intangible assets;(5) the expenditures arising from development phase of the intangible assets can be measured reliably.Impairment of intangible assets: the Company conducts a comprehensive inspection on intangible assets at the end of the reporting period. If the intangible assets have been replaced by other new technologies so as to seriously affect its capacity to create economic benefits for the enterprise, the market value of certain intangible assets sharply fall and is not expected to recover in the remaining amortization period, certain intangible asset has exceeded the legal time limit but still has some value in use as well as the intangible asset impairment has occurred, the provision for impairment is done according to the difference between the individual estimated recoverable amount and the book value. Impairment loss on the intangible asset shall not be reversed in subsequent accounting periods once recognized.Accounting method of capitalization of borrowing costsBorrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization should be charged into the relevant costs of assets and therefore should be capitalized. Borrowing costs incurred after qualifying assets for capitalization reaches the estimated use state are charged to profit or loss in the current period. Other borrowing costs are recognized as expenses based on the accrual and are charged to profit or loss in the current period.Capitalization of borrowing costs should meet the following conditions: expenditures are being incurred, which comprise disbursements incurred in the form of payments of cash, transfer of non-monetary assets or assumption of interest-bearing debts for the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets for capitalization; borrowing costs are being incurred; purchase, construction or manufacturing activities that are necessary to prepare the assets for their intended use or sale are in progress.Capitalization amount of borrowing interest: the borrowing interest incurred from the acquisition, construction or production of assets eligible for capitalization borrowed specifically or generally should be determined the capitalization amount according to the following method before the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset reaching its intended use or sale state:---Where funds are borrowed specifically for purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization, costs eligible for capitalization are the actual interest costs incurred in current period less the interest income of unused borrowing funds deposited in the bank or any income earned on the temporary investment of such borrowings.---Where funds allocated for purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization are part of a general pool, the eligible capitalization interest amounts are determined by multiplying a capitalization rate of general borrowing by the weighted average of accumulated capital expenditures over those on specific borrowings. The capitalization rate will be determined based on the weighted average rate of the borrowing costs applicable to the general pool.Suspension for capitalization: Capitalization of borrowing costs should be suspended during periods in which purchase, construction or manufacturing of assets eligible for capitalization is interrupted abnormally with the interruption time exceeding three months continuously. Borrowing costs incurred during the interruption should be charged to profit or loss for the current period, and should continue to be capitalized when purchase, construction or manufacturing of the relevant assets resumes. If the interruption is the necessary procedure to prepare the assets purchased, constructed or manufactured eligible for capitalization for their intended use or sale, the borrowing costs should continue to be capitalized.Recognition criteria and measurement method of estimated liabilities Recognition criteria of estimated liabilities: when the external security, pending litigation or arbitration, product quality assurance, layoffs, loss of contracts, restructuring obligations, fixed asset retirement obligations and other pertinent business meet the following conditions, it can be recognized as the liability: (1) the obligation is a present obligation of the Company; (2)it is probable that settlement of such an obligation will result in the economic benefit to flow out from the Company;(3) the amount of the obligation can be measured reliably.Measurement method of estimated liabilities: The Company’s estimated liabilities shall be initially measured at the best estimates of the necessary expenditures for the fulfillment of the present obligations. To determine the best estimates, the Company shall take into full account the risks, uncertainties, time value of money, and other factors relating to the contingencies. If the time value of money is significant, the best estimates shall be determined after discounting the relevant future cash outflows. If there is a continuous range for the necessary expenses, and probabilities of occurrence of all the outcomes within this range are equal, the best estimate shall be determined at the average amount within the range. The best estimates shall be determined as follows in other circumstances: (1) if the contingency involves a single item, the best estimate shall be determined at the most likely outcome; (2) if the contingency。
财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献编辑Introduction:Financial statement analysis is an essential tool used by businesses and investors to evaluate the financial performance and position of a company. It involves the examination of financial statements such as the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement to assess the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. In this document, we will provide a detailed analysis and translation of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis.1. Importance of Financial Statement Analysis:Financial statement analysis provides valuable insights into a company's financial health and helps stakeholders make informed decisions. It enables investors to assess the profitability and growth potential of a company before making investment decisions. Additionally, it helps creditors evaluate the creditworthiness and repayment capacity of a company before extending credit. Furthermore, financial statement analysis assists management in identifying areas of improvement and making strategic decisions to enhance the company's performance.2. Key Elements of Financial Statement Analysis:a) Balance Sheet Analysis:The balance sheet provides a snapshot of a company's financial position at a specific point in time. It presents the company's assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity. By analyzing the balance sheet, stakeholders can assess the company's liquidity, solvency, and financial stability.b) Income Statement Analysis:The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, presents the company's revenues, expenses, and net income over a specific period. It helps stakeholders evaluate the company's profitability, revenue growth, and cost management.c) Cash Flow Statement Analysis:The cash flow statement details the inflows and outflows of cash during a specific period. It provides insights into the company's operating, investing, and financing activities. By analyzing the cash flow statement, stakeholders can assess the company's ability to generate cash, meet its financial obligations, and fund its growth.3. Financial Ratios for Analysis:Financial ratios are essential tools used in financial statement analysis to assess a company's performance and compare it with industry benchmarks. Some commonly used financial ratios include:a) Liquidity Ratios:- Current Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations.- Quick Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory.b) Solvency Ratios:- Debt-to-Equity Ratio: Measures the proportion of debt to equity in a company's capital structure.- Interest Coverage Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet interest payments on its debt.c) Profitability Ratios:- Gross Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company's core operations.- Net Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company after all expenses, including taxes.d) Efficiency Ratios:- Inventory Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company sells its inventory.- Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company collects cash from its customers.4. Translation of Foreign Literature:In this section, we will provide a translation of key points from foreign literature related to financial statement analysis. The literature emphasizes the importance of accurate financial reporting, the use of financial ratios for analysis, and the interpretation of financial statements to make informed decisions.Conclusion:Financial statement analysis is a crucial process for evaluating a company's financial performance and position. It provides valuable insights into a company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. By analyzing financial statements and using financial ratios, stakeholders can make informed decisions regarding investments, credit extension, and strategic planning. Accurate translation and understanding of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis can further enhance the effectiveness of this process.。
财务报表分析外文文献及翻译LNTU---Acc附录A财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值比率摘要关键词:财政杠杆;运营债务杠杆;股本回报率;值比率传统观点认为,杠杆效应是从金融活动中产生的:公司通过借贷来增加运营的资金。
杠杆作用的衡量标准是负债总额与股东权益。
然而,一些负债——如银行贷款和发行的债券,是由于资金筹措,其他一些负债——如贸易应付账款,预收收入和退休金负债,是由于在运营过程中与供应商的贸易,与顾客和雇佣者在结算过程中产生的负债。
融资负债通常交易运作良好的资本市场其中的发行者是随行就市的商人。
与此相反,在运营中公司能够实现高增值。
因为业务涉及的是与资本市场相比,不太完善的贸易的输入和输出的市场。
因此,考虑到股票估值,运营负债和融资负债的区别的产生有一些先验的原因。
我们研究在资产负债表上,运营负债中的一美元是否与融资中的一美元等值这个问题。
因为运营负债和融资负债是股票价值的组成部分,这个问题就相当于问是否股价与账面价值比率是否取决于账面净值的组成。
价格与账面比率是由预期回报率的账面价值决定的。
所以,如果部分的账面价值要求不同的溢价,他们必须显示出不同的账面价值的预期回报率。
因此,标准的财务报表分析的能够区分股东从运营中和借贷的融资业务中产生的利润。
因此,资产回报有别于股本回报率,这种差异是由于杠杆作用。
然而,在标准的分析中,经营负债不区别于融资负债。
因此,为了制定用于实证分析的规范,我们的研究结果是用于愿意分析预期公司的收益和账面收益率。
这些预测和估值依赖于负债的组成。
这篇文章结构如下。
第一部分概述并指出了了能够判别两种杠杆作用类型,连接杠杆作用和盈利的财务报表分析第二节将杠杆作用,股票价值和价格与账面比率联系在一起。
第三节中进行实证分析,第四节进行了概述与结论。
1 杠杆作用的财务报表分析以下财务报表分析将融资债务和运营债务对股东权益的影响区别开。
这个分析从实证的详细分析中得出了精确的杠杆效应等式普通股产权资本收益率=综合所得?普通股本(1) 杠杆影响到这个盈利等式的分子和分母。
会计信息披露外文文献翻译文献出处:Ebimobowei A. A Study of Social Accounting Disclosures in the Annual Reports of Nigerian Companies [J]. Asian Journal of Business Management, 2011, 3(3): 145-151.原文A Study of Social Accounting Disclosures in theAnnual Reports of Nigerian CompaniesAppah EbimoboweiAbstract: Social accounting is concerned with the development of measurement system to monitor social performance. It is rational assessment of and disclosure on some meaningful domain of companies’ activities that have social impact. Thi s study examines the practice of social accounting disclosure in Nigerian companies. Forty companies from eight sectors quoted in the Nigerian Stock Exchange were randomly sampled. Data were collected from the annual reports of the companies’ for the perio d 2005 to 2007 and the level of disclosure is measured using content analysis and descriptive analysis. The paper found that 82.5% of the companies sampled present social accounting information in their annual reports. The results show that Nigerian companies prefer to disclose social accounting information in the Directors Report, Chairman’s Statement and Notes to the Accounts in the form of short qualitative information. Human resources, community involvement and environment were identified as the most popular themes. Hence, the paper recommends among others that companies should take social accounting as a moral duty; legislation for all companies to disclose social accounting information in Nigeria; social indicators to be developed at thenational level in the area of employment opportunities, environmental control, energy conservation, health care etc and professional accounting bodies in the country should collaborate to expand research in social accounting.Key words: Annual reports, social accounting, social disclosure, NigeriaINTRODUCTIONThe increasing need for every organization to disclose in their annual reports the various activities that affect the society is becoming a very fundamental issue all over the world mostly in developed economies, but this is not the case in developing countries like Nigeria. This is because organizations are particularly more interested in the profit maximization objective to the detriment of the society. According to Iyoha (2010), in developing countries, the concern is about how efficient organizations are in terms of how much profits are made and how much dividends are paid. No serious thoughts are given to social issues in the annual reports of organizations such as environmental protection, energy savings, fair business practice, and community involvements etc. Asechemie (1996) stress that the absence of financial data relating to actions and arrangements for social concern in Nigeria is not in accord with the trend in the USA, Europe and Canada where companies are required to report on the effect of compliance with laws governing corporate social conduct on capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position.The objective of this paper is to examine the social accounting disclosures in the annual reports of Nigerian companies. Therefore, the content of annual reports must provide information to users relating to social factors. AsMathews (2002) suggested in his study, documenting and analyzing what is disclosed in the area of social accounting should be one of the feature of corporate social reporting. Hence, this study attempts to answer two main questions: (i) what are the most popular types of social accounting and how is social accounting disclosed in the annual reports of companies in Nigeria and (ii) where is the location of presentation of social accounting in the annual reports of companies in Nigeria. To achieve this objective, the paper is divided into five sections. The next section discusses the theoretical and empirical literatures adopted for the study. Section three examines the methodology of the study; section four examines the findings and discussions while the last section deals with the conclusion and recommendations.Theories on corporate social accounting disclosure behavior:Gray et al. (1995) in Orij (2007) provided a much cited categorization of social accountingdisclosure studies. They talked about three broad classifications of decision usefulness studies, economic theory and social and political theory. The decision usefulness generally relates to the usefulness of accounting information, which is social accounting in this case. These studies are of two types, ranking of information on its perceived decision-usefulness in the financial community and investigations of information on effects on share prices. The economic theory studies are a periphery of agency theory and Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) research. The social and political theory focuses on legitimacy theory (LEGT) and stakeholder theory (STAKT). LEGT and STAKT are theories developed out of political economies. They are overlapping perspectives in a political-economic framework. Intheoretical term, Guthrie and Parker (1990) also analyse their empirical evidence in relation to a socio-political economy theory of social disclosure and suggest that:a political economy theory of social disclosure is both viable and may contribute toward our understanding of observed developments in national reporting practices. Corporate social disclosures have appeared to reflect public social priorities, respond to government pressures, accommodate environmental pressures and sectional interests, and protect corporate prerogatives and projected corporate image.Prior empirical studies: A number of studies have been published on the subject of social accounting disclosure. A number of these rely on content analysis of annual reports. There are several different methods to the analysis of narratives in annual reports. Bettie et al. (2004) distinguish two categories: subjective (analyst ratings) and semi-objective (disclosure index studies, content analysis, readability studies and linguistic analysis). Content analysis has been selected for this study because it has been widely used in the accounting research, particularly in social accounting disclosure studies. Since this is the method of analysis in the present study, we limit our review to these studies. Table 1 summary the methodology, sample and main results of these studies.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONLevel of social accounting disclosure: Table 2 shows that 33 companies (82.5%) from various industry groupings made social accounting disclosures at least for oneyear in their annual reports. Analysis based on industry, showed that chemical and paints, construction and petroleum marketing had 100 percent disclosure of social accountinginformation. The lowest level of social accounting information was 66.7% contributed by Breweries and conglomerate while companies in the building materials (75%), food/beverages and tobacco (80%), and healthcare (83.3%) level of disclosure from year 2005 to 2007. Therefore, it can be deduced that there is a growing concern for companies reporting social performance in their financial statements.Form of social accounting disclosure: Table 3 shows that in 2005 75% of the companies disclose social accounting information using narrative/pictures and 25% disclose with monetary formats. The year 2006 81% used narrative and 19% used monetary format while in 2007 84% used narrative and 16% monetary format. However, there were also companies that used both narrative and monetary formats of disclosure. Many companies were also found to have used the monetary format to disclose human resource information and environmental contribution primarily related to retirement benefit, training and development and some community based projects such as adopting school, scholarships and donations.Location of social accounting disclosure: Table 4 shows that 4(12.12%) of the sampled companies (Appendix) disclose social accounting information in the chairman’s statement; 17(51.52%) disclose social accounting information in the directors report; 2(6.06%) in the statement of accounting policy; 10(30.30%) in the notes to the accounts. The paper discovers that Directors report is the most popular location where social accounting information is disclosed by companies in Nigeria and also the “notes to the accounts”. This result is also consistent with Mamman (2004) study that Directors report is the most preferred location of social accounting information.Quantification of amount of social accounting disclosure:This study used only number of disclosure as the approach of capturing data through content analysis. Almost all companies disclosed social accounting information in short qualitative discussion and some have extended qualitative discussion where they have sections to disclose the social accounting information especially on human resources andcommunity based projects.Trend of social accounting disclosure: Table 5 shows the trend of social accounting disclosures in Nigeria. Twelve (12) companies representing (36.36%) reveals that human resources is the trend of social accounting disclosure in the annual report; two companies representing (6.06%) says the trend is fair business practice; nine (9) companies representing (27.27%) suggests community development; three (3) companies representing (9.09%) reveals that the trend of social accounting is energy; five (5) companies representing (15.16%) in their annual reports disclosed that the trend is on the environment; and two (2) companies representing (6.06%) disclosed in their annual reports that the trends is on the organization’s products. The analysis therefore reveals that disclosure of social and environmental activities is specifically on the discretion of the companies.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONThe study examined social accounting disclosure for a three-year period from 2005 to 2007. The type of social accounting disclosure, form and location were identified in the annual reports of 40 companies. This covers eight sectors of the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The study found that 82.5% of Nigerian Companies disclose one type or the other of social accountinginformation in their annual reports. These disclosures were voluntary in nature and largely qualitative; contrary to the developed and some developing countries. The most favoured places of disclosure are in the Directors Report, Chairman’s Statement and Notes to the account. The most popular theme that most companies disclose is human resources followed by community involvement and environment. Analysis done by industry found that the petroleum marketing, food/beverages and tobacco, chemicals and paints sectors provides a higher percentage of social accounting disclosure in Nigeria. Therefore, on the basis of the conclusion above, the following suggestions are provided by the researcher to improve the social accounting practice in Nigeria:﹒Companies should take social accounting disclosure as their moral duty; mere legislation would not solve the problem.﹒The government should provide some incentives like differentials in tax treatment, subsidies, rebates etc. so that companies can take social programmes.﹒Researchers should provide the basis and means of social accounting quantification as far as possible.﹒The government should put in place suitable legislation for all companies to compel them to make adequate disclosure of their activities to the society.﹒Professional institutes in the country like the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria and the Association of National Accountants of Nigeria should work together for developing social accounting and reporting techniques.﹒Social indicators should be developed at the national level in the areas of employment opportunities, environmental control, energy conservation, health education etc.译文会计信息披露,尼日利亚公司年度报告的实证研究阿帕·艾比莫泊威摘要:会计信息披露关系到对社会绩效监督的评估系统的发展。
外文文献翻译译文原文:Manufacturing Corporate Identities: An Analysis of FinancialStatement Footnote DisclosuresFinancial reporting of organizational performance is facilitated primarily through financial statements and the related supplemental disclosures found in the annual report or Form 10-K. Standardized financial statements, such as the income statement, balance sheet and statement of cash flows, are mostly uniform in format and thus provide for inter-firm comparisons of various financial metrics. This ―boilerplate‖ format provides for simple ―net income‖ or ―current assets‖ comparisons between firms given the uniformity of the content contained within each financial statement; however, there are supplemental disclosures contained within these reports that should provide additional information to illuminate and thereby enhance the financial statement content.We previously studied a McDonald-ized or scripted boilerplate discourse in place for corporate financial reporting that extended beyond the financial statement format (Hillon & Smith, 2004). Due to the lack of specific requirements on management discussion and analysis and financial disclosure footnote formatting, the prevailing theory on organizational identity suggests that firms should use financial narratives to differentiate themselves from their competitors thereby manufacturing their corporate identity. Given this, we expected to find a wide array of supplemental reporting content that was also as unique and differentiable as the firms themselves. To test this we obtained a random sample from the S&P 500 Index of firms and examined the frequency distributions of the number of footnotes and related page number totals contained in each of the supplemental financial footnote disclosures from each firm within our sample. We found a clustering tendency, which is suggestive of a homogeneous rather than heterogeneous firm identity. We next performed a content analysis of the supplemental footnote disclosures. When we categorized the footnotes by actual title using the firm with the fewest number offootnotes as the minimum, over 70% of the sample firms had identical or similar footnote titles. We then analyzed the related footnote content and found an even stronger relationship with over 90% of the firms reporting the same or similar content. The implications of our preliminary findings are important in light of corporate identity as they are more supportive of a homogeneous reporting regiment rather than a heterogeneous firm identity. We conclude with these implications and the need for further research in this area.The origins of research into organizational identity can be traced back much further than the field of organization studies itself. For instance, the looking-glass self was a phrase coined by one of the luminaries in the field of sociology (Cooley, 1909) to describe the construction of identity as a reflexive socialization process. We look into the mirror of society to see how others view and judge our behavior, and over time, a distinctive identity is shaped and constructed (Tischler, 2002). Corporate identities can also be viewed as the products of reflexive social interaction, as annual reports, financial disclosures, and feedback from both shareholders and regulating entities constitute a process that is analogous to looking into a mirror to both assess and influence the perceptions of society.Glynn, Barr, & Dacin (2000, p. 730-731) have observed that ―because an identity is self- reflexive, it influences how the organization’s strategic issues are defined and resolved.‖ However, the major difficulty in assessing the social influences on identity construction is the necessity of identifying the salient contextual factors that enable separation of an organization from its environment, as well as categorization of components within the organization. This continual search for novel dimensions of comparison implies that social identities never completely coalesce around static values and terminal meaning. Also, the concepts of status and legitimacy are presumed to be transient. Hence, motivated by an imbalance in social status, an organization that compares unfavorably in strategic competencies to its competitors may attempt to showcase other more favorable attributes to enhance its identity (Chattopadhyay, Tluchowska, & George, 2004).Hogg&Terry (2002, p. 125) suggested that benchmarking with a set ofdifferentially prestigious organizations is ―one way in which organizations may deliberately manipulate the inter-group social comparative context.‖ Fin ancial data in both quantitative and qualitative form is the lingua franca of benchmarking studies, thus, within a social identity theory frame; one would expect to find salient differences in form and content of all such identity defining prototypes. For our study, this implies that creative responses to ameliorate the perceived inequalities among corporations should appear, at least from time to time, in the identity construction tools available to each organization. Thus, we should expect to occasionally see distinctive form and content in the financial metrics and narratives of corporate disclosures. At the very least, we should expect to see some form of stratification based on prestige or attempts at social mobility.Previous research has suggested a need for further exploration of this phenomenon, as Hillon and Smith’s (2004) financial socialization pilot study found more of a McDonaldized or scripted ―boilerplate‖ discourse in place for corporate financial reporting. Due to the lack of specific requirements on management discussion and analysis and financial footnote disclosure formatting, the prevailing theory on organizational identity suggests that firms should use these financial narratives and metrics to differentiate themselves from their competitors. The capital markets need financial information to differentiate firms and thereby avoid the problem of adverse selection. According to Scott (2003, p. 11- 12): to understand how financial accounting can help to control the adverse selection problem, it is desirable to have an appreciation of how investors make decisions. This is because knowledge of investor decision processes is essential if the accountant is to know what information they need. The accounting reaction to securities market efficiency has been full disclosure, that is, the supplying of large amounts of information to help investors make their own predictions of future firm performance. The form of the disclosure does not matter – it can be in notes, or in supplementary disclosures such as reserve recognition accounting and management discussion and analysis, in addition to the financial statements proper.From another perspective, the FASB issued a pronouncement addressing theusefulness of financial disclosures in Statement of Financial Accounting Concept (SFAC) Number 2. This authoritative pronouncement essentially defined the relevance of financial information in assisting the financial statement users to form their own understanding of financial events relative to their expectations. In addition to present events, the financial information can also assist the user in forming predictions of events such as future profitability. SFAC 2 (1996, p. 1035) stated in part: Relevant accounting information is capable of making a difference in a decision by helping users to form predictions about outcomes of past, present, and future events or to confirm or correct prior expectations. Information can make a difference to decisions by improving decision makers’ capacities to predict or by providing feedback on earlier expectations. Usually, information does both at once, because knowledge about the outcomes of actions already taken will generally improve decision makers’ abilities to predict the results of similar future actions. Without knowledge of the past, the basis for a prediction will usually be lacking. Without an interest in the future, knowledge of the past is sterile.From an organizational perspective, Scott (1981, p. 89) noted that ―interaction with the environment is essential for open system functioning.‖ Information is an essential link between the firm and the environment in which it operates and the financial information disseminated by a firm is extremely important to outside investors and financial decision-makers, the primary constituents of the capital markets. Authoritative literature in accounting and management presupposes that the financial information disclosed by management will be understood and appropriately utilized by the capital markets (Jones & Shoemaker, 1994), regardless of the accounting methods applied. However, as the gatekeeper to essentially perfect information about the firm, management controls access to sensitive proprietary information. Accordingly, management selectively offers information disclosures to the capital markets, rather than all firm information, in order to shape its corporate identity.The FASB stated in SFAC 1 (1996, p. 1018) that: ―the usefulness of financial information as an aid to investors, creditors, and others in forming expectations abouta business enterprise may be enhanced by management’s explanations of the information. Management knows more about the enterprise and its affairs than investors, creditors, and other ―outsiders‖.Given that it has this superior information management may choose to selectively communicate financial information to those outside of the firm by means of financial disclosures. Thus, management must balance the needs for disseminating information in the interest of securities market efficiency against its own needs for continually shaping and constructing its social identity. The FAS addressed this responsibility for balance reporting by management in SFAC1 (1996, p. 1014) as follows:Financial reporting should provide information that is useful to present and potential investors and creditors and other users in making rational investment, credit, and similar decisions. The information should be comprehensible to those who have a reasonable understanding of business and economic activities and are willing to study the information with reasonable diligence.In light of management’s dual purposes for information dissemination, we cannot overemphasize the necessity for users of their financial disclosures to exercise due diligence in attaining a balanced understanding of the information content to thus make judicious investment decisions.Failure to fully observe and comprehend all of the disclosed financial information does not adversely impact the quality of the financial information. However, such a partial vie w into Cooley’s (1909 looking-glass of reflexive identity would likely distort the reflected image, contrary to the firm’s intent. Thus, in anticipation of potential image distortion, we would expect firms to overemphasize, rather than underplay, their salient and distinctive features through al channels at their disposal. Supplemental financial disclosures were intended by the FASB to aid in clarifying the unique business circumstances that arise in the life of every firm. Information reifies the corporate identity, and thus, we would expect supplemental financial disclosures to enable investors to further differentiate among firms. To test this assertion, we turned our attention to a practical assessment of the management’suse of financial information as a versatile too of corporate identity construction.MethodsWe took a random sample of 30 companies from the Standard and Poor 500 Index and then obtained the latest year end annual report or Form 10k for each firm selected. Next, we analyzed the form and content of the footnote disclosures for the financial statements contained therein with both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Supplemental footnote disclosures provide needed illumination of the basic set of required financial statements contained in each annual report or Form 10k. These minimum expectations for statement disclosures quite rationally should lead to a uniform ―boilerplate‖ financial statement format, as ―organizational fields establish norms that create cognitive expectations for ot her organizations to follow‖ (Glynn, Barr, & Dacin, 2000, p. 730). However, the same line of reasoning should not apply to the form and content of supplemental footnotes that purport to illuminate firm-specific elements of the financial statements. Hence, one should very reasonably not expect to find them presented in a uniform or ―boiler plate‖ format. Next, to facilitate a quantitative content analysis, we began by counting the number of footnote disclosures as well as the related number of pages from each company report from our sample set. These supplemental footnote disclosures provide needed illumination of the basic set of required financial statements contained in each annual report or Form 10-K. While we concede the necessity of a uniform ―boiler plate‖ financial statement format our concern was that the supplemental footnotes that provide additional specific information in order to illuminate the financial statements were not themselves a uniform or ―boiler plate‖ format. We then observed the freque ncy distributions of the total number of footnotes and the total number of pages containing the footnote disclosures for each firm.After counting the total number of footnotes and related number of total pages contained in each company report and assessing the sample through descriptive statistics, our next step was to classify and categorize the footnote disclosures by title and then content. We designated the firm with the fewest number of footnotes as our minimum value disclosure and then compared the other firms in the sample byfootnote title and then by content to that minimum value firm.Similarities and differences were then observed for both footnote title used as well as for actual footnote content. For purposes of categorization, our table for the footnote titles consisted of a matrix with the actual titles used in the minimum number of notes firm with four categories of footnote titles classified as either: (a) Same, (b) Similar, (c) Different, or (d) Not Found For a footnote title to be classifi ed as ―Same‖ the title would have to be identical. For example, the footnote title Income Taxes was found in the minimum footnote firm. Thus, for any firm to be categorized as ―Same,‖ the title would have to be labeled identically as Income Taxes. A footnote title of Provision for Income Taxes would be classified as ―Similar,‖ as the title includes income Taxes, but is not strictly identical. If references to income taxes were included in a footnote section under a title such as Deferred Obligations, then the classification would be ―Different.‖ Finally, if there were no provision for income taxes in the disclosure notes and thus, no related footnote title, then ―Not Found‖ would be the appropriate classification. We then reviewed the footnote titles matrix for any related content of the footnote disclosuresThe purpose of this exhaustive review was to further clarify the categorization of the footnotes by incorporating the content. For example, Firm A may have had lease activity disclosed in the footnotes un der the title of ―Leases‖. Firm B may have also had leasing activities but disclosed the content in a footnote titled―Commitments‖. By only considering the footnote titles Firm A would be categorized as having lease related disclosures whereas Firm B would not be categorized with leasing activities. This potential obfuscation is thus mitigated when content is considered for purposes of categorization. Accordingly, both firms would be properly categorized as―Similar‖ in the footnote content matrix and thereby elucidate the similarities among firms that may not be apparent by only considering the footnote titles. A presentation and discussion of the descriptive statistics for our analysis follows in the next section.ConclusionOur initial findings are suggestive of a homogeneous rather than heterogeneous regiment of supplemental financial disclosures. In concluding that firms apparentlyuse their supplemental financial disclosures to decrease distinctiveness among peers, we end this study with a better empirical understanding of the complex phenomenon of corporate identity construction. However, the theoretical assumptions of differentiation from previous research may need to be reconsidered in light of our preliminary findings and thus may require that we now consider other sources to provide a more meaningful theoretical basis for future research. Echoing Albert & Whetten (1985), Pratt & Foreman (2000) explored how organizations manage the multiple competing and often conflicting identities within the collective by assessing their self-identified central, distinctive, and enduring attributes. One of the strategic benefits of a diversity of identities noted in their study is that a minimal set of identities serves to increase the organization’s repertoire of responses to a complex environment. In essence, a corporate identity is the superficial reflection of the organization’s underlying requisite variety. We attempted to extend this line of reasoning by positing that the firm’s financial disclosures should al so constitute just such a superficial representation of the underlying distinctive competencies. The strategic competitive advantage of an organization must in some way distinguish it from its competitors, therefore we quite reasonably expected to see specific and unique features in the form and content of the annual reports-established tools of social identity construction-for the S&P 500 firms in our random sample. Ironically, a strategic focus on core competencies to create a distinctive competitive advantage can work against adaptive capacity by reducing variety within the organization (Glynn, Barr, & Dacin, 2000).Hence, a possible explanation for the apparent propensity of firms to manufacture standardized corporate identities through their financial disclosures is that many organizations are pursuing variety-reducing strategies to differentiate themselves. In contrast to this strategic orientation, Glynn & Abzug (2002, p. 267) followed an institutional theory frame in arguing that symbolic isomorph ism or ―the resemblance of an organization’s symbolic attributes to those of other organizations within its institutional field‖ conveys legitimacy. Our theoretical contribution beyond those of the two previous research citations was to show that both strategic andsymbolic isomorphism were not confined by industry, inter-organizational, or institutional fields, as our sample was randomly drawn from the entire S&P 500.Therefore, our findings suggest that these theoretical explanations may be insufficient for exploring identity construction. A more expansive secondary socialization (Berger & Luckmann, 1966) model of organizational identity, as indicated by previous research (Hillon & Smith, 2004), may be necessary in order to capture and comprehend a more profound perspective on identity construction through financial narratives and other disclosures of organizational performance. Such an approach could feasibly provide broader theoretical support for the clash of objectives observed in firms pursuing variety-reducing strategies while simultaneously attempting to create distinctive corporate identities.While we initially attempted to analyze the process of corporate identity construction through supplemental footnote disclosures, we now realize that we have only taken a first step toward revealing the true nature of an apparently homogeneous ―boilerplate‖ supplemental disclosure regiment. Additional research to examine the Management Discussion and Analysis (MDA) section of the annual reports may be needed to provide further insight into this identity de-constructing affinity for standardized reporting and information disclosure.Source: Smith, William L Vol.4 Issue 1/2 p120-129, 10p译文:制造企业特性:财务报表附注披露的分析有效执行的财务报告主要是通过财务报表和年度报告或10 - K表格找到的相关补充披露来简化。