2020年1月24日托福写作真题

xx年1月24日托福独立写作真题范文xx年1月24日托福独立写作真题范文经济危机时政府应该在那些领域减少支出?为什么?下面是的'独立写作作文，大家可以参考参考。

In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce its spending?1. Arts2. Scientific research3. Parks and public gardens.During an economic crisis, governments face difficult choices of moary allocation with reduced budgets. In this challenging time, it is of vital importance for policy-makers to recognize the effectiveness of policy-making on certain social services or programs such as arts,scientific research and park and public gardens. If a choice has to be made, in my opinion, the government should reduce its spending on arts.To begin with, in times of an economic crisis, it is significant for policy-makers to recognize the necessity of investing in scientific research because it exerts a far-reaching effect. If the financial crisis leads to substantial cuts in funding for scientific research by governments, it will be difficult to muster investment for a public good, like clean air, or for extremely risky initiatives, such as novel approaches to new antibioticdrugs, or in areas where the oute is uncertain. As a matter of fact, technological innovation, biomedical breakthroughs, and tackling pressing environmental issues all require sustained scientific development, from basic discovery to final application. Investing in research is investing inthe future, and it requires a long-term mitment to the aumulation of knowledge, the testing of basic principles, and the translation of these discoveries into practical applications that impact everyday life. Consequently, governments ought to attach more importance to thescientific studies so as to develop world class research base and conduct crucial scientific projects.Furthermore, funding for parks and public gardens provides an opportunity for people to engage in physical activities, which is considerably beneficial to health. Nowadays, due to the sedentary lifestyle and unhealthyeating diet, overweight and obesity are epidemic problems across the world, and related conditions are on the rise. A primary focus of attention is providing environment where people can be physically active. Parks offer such an opportunity. In addition, health studies have shown that people who do regular exercise get a range of benefits when they are in natural settings, like parks and public gardens. These benefits include reduced risk of premature death; reduced risk of heart disease, hypertension, cancer;improved maintenance of muscle strength; weight loss and favorable redistribution of body fat; improved physical functioning. Therefore, when governments allocate fiscal spending on parks such as well-designed and well-maintained paths as well as attractive scenery, people can substantially improve their health and quality of life by doing moderate amounts of physical activity in their daily lives.Undeniably, if governments pay more attention to investment in art, people can enrich inner world as a diverse and productive cultural environment can provide the spirit and important intangible values. However, in times of crisis, people usually lay emphasis on basic needs instead of spiritual needs. As a result, the importance of material forts outweighs that of nourishment for the mind and it does not mean that people’s quality of life will be dramatically affected if governments cut budget on art and provide less financial support on art institutions. In a sense, it will not directly influence people’s life at least in a short term because people rarely need to satisfy their aesthetic needs everyday. Therefore, pared with scientific research and park and public gardens, art is least associated with people’s daily life and it needs less concern.From what has been discussed above, scientific studies serve the mon interest of the entire human race and doing exercise in parks and public gardens constitutes an indispensable part of daily life. It is more applicable and reasonable to cut down spending on art in the times of an economic crisis.。

2020年托福写作模拟试题及答案（卷十）大学应加强设施建设还是招聘好老师托福写作题目为：Do you agree or disagree: the universities should spend more money in improving facilities (libraries, computer labs) than hiring famous teachers。

下面大家一起来看看托福写作真题的分析及范文。

Do you agree or disagree: the universities should spend more money in improving facilities (libraries, computer labs) than hiring famous teachers.托福写作范文参考一:Cradles of cultivating talents, universities are supposed to provide most high-caliber education. Responding to the expectation, universities have to think the issue over. Compared with hiring more teachers, from my own perspective, keeping facilities and resources in the universities most advanced and updated is more essential not only for students but also for renowned professors.First of all, students are able to enjoy a better study environment if their schools utilize advanced equipment. With the assistance of exquisite inventions such as electronic screen and projectors, as well as laboratory equipment, like microscopes and chemical reactors, studying would no longer be a tedious and repetitious information engrafting process, but a way everyone would like to get involved in. Similarly,definitions and formulas of physics and chemistry will graven in students’minds deeply if they are aided by the equipment when experimenting. However, hardly can professors crystalize abstract concepts into definite ideas without advanced teaching devices.What is more, as for famous teachers themselves, a university that does not invest in its facilities would be appealing. To be constantly enthusiastic on researching their respective academic fields, teachers have a great demand for exquisite facilities to maintain progressing on their own fields. The most sophisticated technological devices offered in universities enable these teachers to conduct successful researches and remain at the top, which is really attractive to those renowned professors. By contrast, old and obsolete teaching and studying facilities will certainly not inspire teachers to keep further academic researching. Also, practically impossible will teachers have interest in making progress.Granted, it is conceded that hiring more teachers in universities means guaranteeing education quality in some sense because every student will be concerned and cared about. Even slightest and most subtle academic performance changes of students will be noticed; therefore, teachers can encourage and guide frustrated and upsetting students in time. However, while weighing the benefits brought by investing in facilities and hiring more teachers, we can conclude thatfacilities are more worthwhile.In conclusion, I should reiterate that universities should update their facilities, making a top priority. Without advanced facilities, a university will not be helped further improved.托福写作写作参考二:7月16日托福独立写作范文Advanced facilities, like libraries, research center, university hospital are indispensible parts of a good university while famous teachers are also a big component of a prestigious higher institution. Personally, I think it is better for universities to spend more money in hiring famous professors.Admittedly, research centers can be a place where advanced technology is incubated, a library that incorporates state-of-the-art technology can also be conducive to students' study, however, I still believe that famous professors play a more significant role in assessing the reputation of a university.First off, well-respected professors in a specific field can bring lots of benefits not only to the whole community but also to the university. To more specific, prestigious professors can come up with theories and solutions to the most intriguing problems faced by human beings, like treatment of cancers, diabetes and even heart attack. Economists can use data and economic models in their empirical study to predict theeconomy, and it can provide lots of information for the authority to make timely adjustment to their policies. Electronic engineers can design some micro-chips that can sustain large-scale computation. The benefits that professors bring to the school can be also enormous. For instance, a Novel Prize laureate can attract countless research foundations and donations from both the private and public sectors, with this large sum of money, the university can in turn renovate labs, research centers and even libraries.Additionally, well-established professors and researchers can educate and enlighten brilliant young students and cultivate future scientists. Famous professors are usually expert in education, they might have been teaching and researching in their field for more than a few decades, thus have accumulated lots of rich teaching experience and developed the most effective teaching approach. Together with their superb charisma, lots of bright young adults will be motivated and inspired and therefore embark on the road of scientific endeavor and exploration. Such inspirations and motivations cannot be brought by improved facilities. Indeed, it is the expertise and charisma of these famous professors that attract thousands of brilliant young students to enroll in a college.To conclude, hiring more famous professors are more advisable than renovating facilities since the scientific discoveries brought byprofessors can bring colossal benefits to both the community and the university, and also the expertise and charisma of well-established professors can attract, enlighten and cultivate future scientists.想要高薪但是工作时间长的工作吗托福写作题目为：Would you prefer a higher pay job with longer work time or an average pay job with normal work time。

2020年托福写作模拟试题及答案（卷一）Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.托福写作范文：The Internet is a great invention be cause it disseminates information freely. Freedom of information is in the interest of a country and its citizens, but, in light of the information anarchy on the Internet, people need to learn and understand how to evaluate and use the information they find at their fingertips.The Internet promotes freedom of information and freedom of speech, which are integral part of a successful modern democratic society. With innumerable news sources at their disposal citizens have the opportunity to educate themselves, and this knowledge will allow them to contribute to the progression of their society.Similarly, the ability to consult different viewpoints, especially those diverging from their own, will allow people engage in meaningful dialogue with other citizens. The result of this continued discourse will be a more open minded and also tolerant society. As a vehicle of communication the Internet will connect people of the same interests and the same concerns. Thus connected citizens will be encouraged towork together and they will become active participants of society rather than passive subjects.Critics of the Internet's free flow of information are concerned that people will fall victim to bad or rather incorrect information and act on it. This concern is warranted in so far that the Internet is intrinsically anarchic, and anybody with a computer can create Website and post information thereon. As a result, it can be very difficult to determine what information is correct or reliable and which is not. However, difficult as it may seem, there are ways that one can navigate the information jungle of the Internet and arrive at conclusions. In order to do so one has to learn to valuate sources of information. For example, the Website of a research scientist at a major university or that of a well-known non-profit organization is a more reliable source of information than the personal Website of a senior school student.Which would you choose: a high-paying job with long hours that would give you little time with family and friends or a lower-paying job with shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details.托福写作范文：I am optimistic that through my studies and continued hard work I will be able to find a job that will provide my future family and me with financial security. We should be able to afford the necessities of life, suchas a modest home, enough food to nourish us and keep us in good health, as well as education for our children. Hopefully, I will find myself in the fortunate situation where I can decide between a high-paying job with long hours and a lower-paying job with shorter hours. I would choose the job with the lower salary and greater personal time without hesitation, because my family and friends are the most important things in my life.Time is the greatest investment I can make into the relationships with my wife and my children. A marriage is not just a decision one makes but a promise that one keeps. In order to do so one has to be there for the other person and share moments of joy as well as times of difficulty. Nowadays, too many relationships wither away as the partners are unable to work out their problems or bond through meaningful experiences. Personal careers become too important and family time becomes a rare occurrence.The absence of one parent, due to professional career or divorce, can have a very negative effect on a child's development. The child might question his value to father or mother (depending on which one is continually absent) and develop low self-esteem. Without the presence of either or, worse, both parents, the child will be more likely to make bad decisions as he is lacking proper guidance. And there is one point should also be mentioned, i.e. neither expensive toys nor fancy clothes。

24英语一大作文真题下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成，希望大家下载以后，能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改，请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料，如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等，如想了解不同资料格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copy excerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!第一段：I really like traveling. It's so much fun to explore new places and meet new people. Last year, I went to a beautiful beach town with my friends. We had a great time swimming in the ocean and sunbathing on the sand.第二段：Another thing I enjoy is reading. I can learn so much from books. Whether it's a novel or a non-fiction book, I always find something interesting. Recently, I read a book about space exploration, and it was fascinating.第三段：Playing sports is also one of my hobbies. It keeps me healthy and active. I like to play basketball with my friends, and we have a lot of fun competing against each other.第四段：In conclusion, traveling, reading, and playing sports are all important parts of my life. They make me happy and fulfilled.。

2020年1月5日托福写作真题及解析关于托福独立写作部分，每期考试的真题回忆以及解析，对于大家来说，也是比较好的复习内容。

有利于我们更好地提高具体的写作能力。

那么针对2020年1月5日的托福独立写作中，真题内容有哪些呢?下面小编为大家整理了详细的内容，供大家参考!2020年1月5日托福写作真题话题分类教育题型二选一题型考题回忆如果你擅长某科。

你的朋友来问你问题，你会帮助他or suggest 他去找专门的老师解答.解题思路教育类话题，难度系数适中1. 二选一，要对这2种方法进行比较。

2. 利弊题型。

分析好坏结果3. 因为是来“问我问题”，“我”给建议。

所以，不仅可以分析对朋友，也可分析对自己的影响。

2020年1月5日托福写作解析参考范文It is a common phenomenon that students meet all sorts of problems to solve in study. Teachers and friends are the ones we can count on no matter how difficult the problems are. But when it comes to whether teachers are more valuable than our friends, some people may agree with it, for experienced tutors can guide us. However, I disagree based on the following reasons.It is not to say tutors do not play an important role in dealing with questions. They would recommend books of specific subject,provide words of wisdom and share their problem-solving mentality to pull us through hard questions. However, we can seek help from our friends who are excelled at a certain subject or have been through the same problem. So the merit from teachers seems insignificant compared with those brought by our friends.First, the problems my friends are faced with can be tackled effectively and timely. Obviously, teachers have a heavy workload. They have to spend hours checking books, studying material and doing research before classes to get fully prepared. Right after class there will be questions to be answered and papers to be graded. Once my friends want to ask teachers for help, they have to make an appointment ahead of time according to teachers’schedules. But for my part, there is close involvement in providing assistance for my friends both at home and in school At home, we can contact at any time, such as chat on some social applications to record the important points or start a video call to shorten the time we type. At school, we take a class in classrooms, prepare for final exams in libraries as well as have a rest in dormitories. As a result, if needing help, my friends can find me wherever and whenever. .Second, I, myself, is also a beneficiary. On the one hand, helping my friends gives me an opportunity to absorb knowledge in more direct and interesting ways. Solutions to math problems are good examples. Instead of reading about obscure concepts, we can see them presented in vivid method in various real-world examples. Instead of reading about complicated formulas, we can see how magically these formulas are applied to a range of problem-solving investigations. Throughout the duration of explaining the understanding of thequestions, I can review what I have learned and detect what I have neglected. On the other hand, it can be a helper for me to acquire essential learning skills. To be specific, while making real contributions to coping with these problems, I am actively learning how to organize, express and transfer which are indispensable for future study even for career life.Therefore, if my friends are struggling with complex problems while studying, I prefer offering help for them to advising them to find a tutor.托福写作高级形容词替换之褒义词1、重要的 importantvital ['va?t(?)l]She had found out some information of vital importance.她已经发现了一些至关重要的信。

2020年1月24日托福听力答案解析对话1教授问学生的暑假怎样过?学生说想留在学校，因为这里是hometown。

学生希望教授给她个reference(此处reference意为推荐信，而非参考文献)。

学生去年在教授去墨西哥时曾协助教授照看房子。

教授说，今年我也有个工作给你，做我的研究助理(research assistant)，去图书馆查资料。

学生很开心，觉得有钱赚，又不耽误她找其他工作。

最后教授让学生与秘书约时间，下次详谈。

工作场景是对话中经常出现的场景，能够参考的题目包括：P9高级讲义中的TEST 6-C2，TEST 7-C1，TPO 40-C2，35-C1，18-C1，17-C2，12-C2和6-C1.讲座1音乐史讲座，讲了madrigal(意大利牧歌)起源与发展。

教授说我们今天来讲madrigal，它不但仅起源于意大利，也融合了其他地区但音乐。

它是一个4-6人的合唱，分低中高声部。

它是将诗人的诗歌配上音乐(set poem to music小黑板上举了一个诗人的例子)，用来传达诗歌中的情感(convey emotion)。

不同的音乐能够表达不同的情感。

而后madrigal发展的越来越复杂，不但仅表达情感，增加了更多的戏剧性效果(more dramatic)。

最后教授说，我这么说太抽象了，所以我给你们布置了作业，听CD。

背景资料补充：Madrigal在很多篇听力真题中都有涉及，因为它是16世纪欧洲世俗音乐(secular music)的代表。

而听力题目中经常涉及文艺复兴时期艺术开始世俗化(secularization)的话题。

这种世俗化体现在各种艺术形式当中，当然其中也包括音乐。

Madrigal的歌词(lyric)多是感伤或爱情内容的田园诗，室内复调音乐的风格。

音乐家在写作牧歌时特别注重对诗文内容的表达，体现在音乐上就是“表情性”的增强。

在16世纪后半叶，欧洲还出现了诗歌的情感与音乐的规则孰轻孰重的争论(音乐理论家Giovanni Artusi和作曲家Claudio Monteverdi的争论)。

托福独立写作常考题目汇总初入托福备考的学生可能会感受到，托福写作也许并不是我们想象中的那么简单。

相比托福口语，对于中国学生来说，托福写作也可以算的上是第二大弱项了。

其中语法、用词以及逻辑思维是写作的问题所在。

只有在日常生活中多读些范文，了解托福写作中满分作文的逻辑思维，从哪方面考虑问题，句型难度，才可更好的进行锻炼。

在以下内容中，我们就为大家分类整理一下常见的托福写作题目，希望能为你的备考带来帮助。

托福独立写作常考题目汇总2022年1月6日独立写作Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.2022年1月13日独立写作你同意还是不同意以下观点：政府投资太空旅行或太空探索完全是浪费钱2022年1月27日独立Which one do you think is the most important factor for a student to success at college or university?1. Tutors in university.2. The encouragement from family and friends.3. High-quality education from high school.2022年1月28日独立写作政府想资助以下方面来提高孩子的教育，Which approach is the best?1. Hire more teachers to teach in a small class2. Preschool education before kindergarten3. To provide some training courses so that teachers can be more professional2022年2月4日独立写作：Agree or disagree? It is better for the younger people to take risk and e某plore new things than the older people.2022年3月10日独立写作：People can solve important problems bythemselves or with the help from their family members, so there is no need forthe government to help them.2022年3月11日独立写作Do you agree or disagree with the following statement：Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families; help from the government is often unnecessary.2022年3月24日独立写作重复2022年7月6日(A/D) People should take time to rela某 with hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work.√ Agree:Point 1: to broaden one’s horizons/develop one’s intere sts.Point 2: to enlarge one’s friend circle.Point 3: combination of one’s career & interestSimilar Topics:Topic 1: Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks during their workday than doing the same task.Topic 2: It is more likely for people with more skills to succeed.托福写作范文:要想取得成功必须接受新观点6月18日托福独立写作真题回顾To be a successful person, one must be open to new ideas and willing to change his or her mind. (大陆)6月18日托福独立写作点睛：题目大意：要想取得成功，人们必须要接受新的观点并且愿意改变自己原有的观点。

托福TPO24综合写作阅读+听力原文+满分范文【雷哥托福整理】考过的同学会发现托福综合作文分数不高，很大程度上是受我们听力实力的影响，我们很多托福考生的听力分数只有16分上下的时候，对于托福综合作文的听力妥妥的是束手无策，而且很多托福考生还感觉自己都听懂了，那也只能说明你听懂了大意，但是听力里面要的是每一个细节！请注意，是每一个细节！雷哥托福小托君给大家分享TPO1-33综合作文部分的阅读和听力文本全集与综合作文的满分作文，以及满分作文的解析。

如果自己的托福综合作文分数如果可以很给力的话，就已经搞定了15分的分数，可以极大地缓解托福独立作文的压力。

如何使用这个文件呢？做托福TPO模考之后，可以根据这里面的听力的文本，来检验自己的听力内容是否抓的足够好，尤其是要看写的够不够全！在托福考试前来做跟读，口语实力不够，那么做跟读，仔细地来模仿ETS官方素材，是一个很好的提高自己口语的方式。

熟悉托福考试的专业词汇。

不少托福考生之所以在听力考试里面不够给力，是因为对于里面的专业词汇不够熟悉。

毕竟在托福考试过程中，如果核心词汇都不懂的话，那么在听力部分只能是束手就擒了。

TPO24 综合写作听力+阅读原文ReadingAnimal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a70-million-year-old fossil of Tyrannosaurus rex (T. rex), a dinosaur, might still contain remains of the actual tissues of the animal. The discovery was made whenresearchers deliberately broke open the T. rex’s leg bone, thereby exposing its insides to reveal materials that seem to be remains of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix.First, the breaking of the fossilized leg bone revealed many small branching channels inside, which probably correspond to hollows in the bones where blood vessels were once located. The exciting finding was the presence of a soft, flexible organic substance inside the channels. This soft substance may very well represent the remains of the actual blood vessels of T. rex.Second, microscopic examination of the various parts of the inner bone revealed the presence of spheres that could be the remains of red blood cells. Tests showed that the spheres contained iron-a material vital to the role of red blood cells in transporting oxygen to tissues. Moreover, the spheres had dark red centers (substances with iron tend to be reddish in color) and were also about the size of red blood cells.Third, scientists performed a test on the dinosaur leg bone that showed that it contained collagen. Collagen is a fibrous protein that is a main component of living bone tissue, in which it forms a so-called collagen matrix. Collagen (or its chemical derivatives) is exactly the kind of biochemical material that one would expect to find in association with bone tissue.ListeningAs much as we would like to have the remains of actual dinosaur tissue, there are sound reasons for being skeptical of the identifications made in the reading.First, the soft, flexible substance inside the bone channels isn’t necessarily the remains of blood vessels. It is much more likely to be something else. Like what? You might say. Well, long after an organism is died, bacteria sometimes colonize hollows, empty areas in bones, like the channels that once held blood vessels. When bacterialived inside bones, they often leave behind traces of organic material. What the researchers in the reading are identifying as blood vessels might just be traces of soft and moist residue left by bacteria colonies.All right. What about the iron-filled spheres? Well, the problem is that scientists found identical reddish spheres in fossils of other animals found in the same place. That includes fossils of primitive animals that did not have any red blood cells when they were alive. Clearly, if these spheres appear in organisms that did not have any red blood cells, then the spheres cannot be the remains of red blood cells. The spheres probably have a very different origin. They are probably just pieces of reddish mineral.Third, the collagen. The problem is that we have never found collagen in animal remains that are older than one hundred thousand years. Collagen probably cannot last longer than that. Finding collagen from an animal that lived seventy million years ago would really contradict our ideas about how long collagen can last. It is just too improbable. The most likely explanation for the presence of collagen is that it doesn’t come from the T.rex, but from another much more recent source. For example, human skin contains collagen, so the collagen may have come from the skin of the researchers who are handling the bone.由于篇幅有限，托福综合写作满分范文，在雷哥托福微信公众号获取。

TPO1-24综合写作：阅读+听力文本【YeeaooBox推荐】特别推荐，感谢原作者目录TPO1 (2)TPO2 (3)TPO3 (4)TPO4 (5)TPO5 (7)TPO6 (8)TPO7 (9)TPO8 (11)TPO9 (12)TPO10 (13)TPO11 (15)TPO12 (16)TPO13 (17)TPO14 (18)TPO15 (20)TPO16 (21)TPO17 (22)TPO18 (23)TPO19 (25)TPO20 (26)TPO21 (27)TPO22 (28)TPO23 (29)TPO24 (30)是免费的托福真题备考网站 (31)随心的YeeaooBox iPhone客户端 (33)是免费的托福真题备考网站我们致力于提供最全的托福纯真题备考资料http:TPO1ReadingIn the United States,employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However,many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so.A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths(80percent)of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option.The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert,and as a result,they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid80percent of the normal rate.In the end,companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money,which would increase company profits.For the country as a whole,one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours,some of their workload would have to be shifted to others.Thus,for every four employees who went on an80percent week,a new employee could be hired at the80percent rate.Finally,the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees.Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families,pursuing private interests,or enjoying leisure activities.ListeningProfessorOffering employees the option of a four-day workweek won't affect the company profits, economic conditions or the lives of employees in the ways the reading suggests.First,offering a four-day workweek will probably force companies to spend more,possibly a lot more.Adding new workers means putting much more money into providing training and medical benefits.Remember the costs of things like health benefits can be the same whether an employee works four days or five.And having more employees also requires more office space and more computers.These additional costs would quickly cut into company profits.Second,with respect to overall employment,it doesn't follow that once some employees choose a four-day workweek,many more jobs will become available.Hiring new workers is costly,as I argued a moment ago.And companies have other options.They might just choose to ask their employees to work overtime to make up the difference.Worse,companies might raise expectations.They might start to expect that their four-day employees can do the same amount of work they used to do in five days.If this happens,then no additional jobs will be created and current jobs will become more unpleasant.Finally,while a four-day workweek offers employees more free time to invest in their personal lives,it also presents some risks that could end up reducing their quality of life.Working a shorter week can decrease employees'job stability and harm their chances for advancing their careers. Four-day employees are likely to be the first to lose their jobs during an economic downturn.They may also be passed over for promotions because companies might prefer to have five-day employees in management positions to ensure continuous coverage and consistent supervision for the entire workweek.TPO2ReadingIn many organizations,perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all,a group of people has a wider range of knowledge，expertise,and skills than any single individual is likely to possess.Also,because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess,a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues.Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake.This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team.Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others.Also,the individual team member has a much better chance to“shine”,to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant,because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.ListeningProfessorNow I want to tell you about what one company found when it decided that it would turn over some of its new projects to teams of people,and make the team responsible for planning the projects and getting the work done.After about six months,the company took a look at how well the teams performed.On virtually every team,some members got almost a"free ride"...they didn't contribute much at all,but if their team did a good job,they nevertheless benefited from the recognition the team got. And what about group members who worked especially well and who provided a lot of insight on problems and issues?Well...the recognition for a job well done went to the group as a whole,nonames were named.So it won't surprise you to learn that when the real contributors were asked how they felt about the group process,their attitude was just the opposite of what the reading predicts.Another finding was that some projects just didn't move very quickly.Why?Because it took so long to reach consensus;it took many,many meetings to build the agreement among group members about how they would move the project along.On the other hand,there were other instances where one or two people managed to become very influential over what their group did. Sometimes when those influencers said"That will never work"about an idea the group was developing,the idea was quickly dropped instead of being further discussed.And then there was another occasion when a couple influencers convinced the group that a plan of theirs was"highly creative."And even though some members tried to warn the rest of the group that the project was moving in directions that might not work,they were basically ignored by other group members. Can you guess the ending to this story?When the project failed,the blame was placed on all the members of the group.TPO3ReadingRembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters.However,there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him.One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style,and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt.But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.First,there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed.She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford.Rembrandt,who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’clothing,would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency.Second,Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow,but in this painting these elements do not fit together.The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below.But below the face is the dark fur collar,which would absorb light rather than reflect it.So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears.Rembrandt would never have made such an error.Finally,examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together.Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels,no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood.For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the1930s.ListeningProfessor:Everything you just read about"Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet"is true,and yet after a thorough re-examination of the painting,a panel of experts has recently concluded that it's indeed a work by Rembrandt.Here is why.First,the fur collar.X-rays and analysis of the pigments in the paint have shown that the fur collar wasn't part of the original painting.The fur collar was painted over the top of the original painting about a hundred years after the painting was made.Why?Someone probably wanted to increase the value of the painting by making it look like a formal portrait of an aristocratic lady.Second,the supposed error with light and shadow.Once the paint of the added fur color was removed,the original could be seen,in the original painting,the woman is wearing a simple collar of light-colored cloth.The light-colored cloth of this collar reflects light that illuminates part of the woman's face.That's why the face is not in partial shadow.So in the original painting,light and shadow are very realistic and just what we would expect from Rembrandt.Finally,the wood panel.It turns out that when the fur collar was added,the wood panel was also enlarged with extra wood pieces glued to the sides and the top to make the painting more grand and more valuable.So the original painting is actually painted on a single piece of wood,as would be expected from a Rembrandt painting.And in fact,researchers have found that the piece of wood in the original form of"Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet"is from the very same tree as the wood panel used for another painting by Rembrandt,his"Self-portrait with a Hat".TPO4ReadingEndotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant.For instance,humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of37°C,no matter whether the environment is warm or cold.Because dinosaurs were reptiles,and modern reptiles are not endotherms,it was long assumed that dinosaurs were not endotherms.However, dinosaurs differ in many ways from modem reptiles,and there is now considerable evidence that dinosaurs were,in fact,endotherms.Polar dinosaursOne reason for believing that dinosaurs were endotherms is that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in polar regions.Only animals that can maintain a temperature well above that of thesurrounding environment could be active in such cold climates.Leg position and movementThere is a connection between endothermy and the position and movement of the legs.The physiology of endothermy allows sustained physical activity,such as running.But running is efficient only if an animal's legs are positioned underneath its body,not at the body's side,as they are for crocodiles and many lizards.The legs of all modern endotherms are underneath the body, and so were the legs of dinosaurs.This strongly suggests that dinosaurs were endotherms.Haversian canalsThere is also a connection between endothermy and bone structure.The bones of endotherms usually include structures called Haversian canals.These canals house nerves and blood vessels that allow the living animal to grow quickly,and rapid body growth is in fact a characteristic of endothermy.The presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong indicator that the animal is an endotherm,and fossilized bones of dinosaurs are usually dense with Haversian canals.ListeningProfessor:Many scientists have problems with the arguments you read in the passage.They don't think those arguments prove that dinosaurs were endotherms.Take the polar dinosaur argument.When dinosaurs lived,even the polar regions,where dinosaur fossils have been found,were much warmer than today,warm enough during part of the year for animals that were not endotherms to live.And during the months when the polar regions were cold, the so-called polar dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer areas or hibernated like many modern reptiles do.So the presence of dinosaur fossils in polar regions doesn't prove the dinosaurs were endotherms.Well,what about the fact that dinosaurs have their legs placed under their bodies,not out to the side like crocodiles.That doesn't necessarily mean dinosaurs were high-energy endotherms built for running.There is another explanation for having legs under the body.This body structure supports more weight,so with the legs under their bodies,dinosaurs can grow to a very large size. Being large had advantages for dinosaurs,so we don't need the idea of endothermy and running to explain why dinosaurs evolved to have their legs under their bodies.Ok,so how about bone structure?Many dinosaur bones do have Haversian canals,that's true.The dinosaur bones also have growth rings.Growth rings are thickening of the bone that indicates periods of time when the dinosaurs weren't rapidly growing.These growth rings are evidence that dinosaurs stopped growing or grew more slowly during cooler periods.This pattern of periodic growth,you know,rapid growth followed by no growth or slow growth,and then rapid growth again,is characteristic of animals that are not endotherms.Animals that maintain a constant body temperature year-round as true endotherms do grow rapidly even when the environment becomes cool.TPO5ReadingAs early as the twelfth century A.D.,the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their"great houses,"massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high.Archaeologists have been trying to determine how the buildings were used.While there is still no universally agreed upon explanation,there are three competing theories.One theory holds that the Chaco structures were purely residential,with each housing hundreds of people.Supporters of this theory have interpreted Chaco great houses as earlier versions of the architecture seen in more recent Southwest societies.In particular,the Chaco houses appear strikingly similar to the large,well-known"apartment buildings"at Taos,New Mexico,in which many people have been living for centuries.A second theory contends that the Chaco structures were used to store food supplies.One of the main crops of the Chaco people was grain maize,which could be stored for long periods of time without spoiling and could serve as a long-lasting supply of food.The supplies of maize had to be stored somewhere,and the size of the great houses would make them very suitable for the purpose.A third theory proposes that houses were used as ceremonial centers.Close to one house,called Pueblo Alto,archaeologists identified an enormous mound formed by a pile of old material. Excavations of the mound revealed deposits containing a surprisingly large number of broken pots. This finding has been interpreted as evidence that people gathered at Pueblo Alto for special ceremonies.At the ceremonies,they ate festive meals and then discarded the pots in which the meals had been prepared or served.Such ceremonies have been documented for other Native American cultures.ListeningProfessor:Unfortunately none of the arguments about what the Chaco great houses were used for is convincing.First,sure,from the outside,the great houses look like later and native American apartment building,but the inside of the great houses casts serious doubt on the idea that many people lived there.I'll explain.If hundreds of people were living in the great houses,then there would have to be many fireplaces,where each family did its daily cooking,but there are very few fireplaces.In one of the largest great houses,there were fireplaces for only around ten families.Yet there wereenough rooms in the great house for more than a hundred families,so the primary function of the houses couldn't have been residential.Second,the idea that the great houses were used to store grain maize is unsupported by evidence. It may sound plausible that large empty rooms were used for storage,but excavations of the great houses have not uncovered many traces of maize or maize containers.If the great houses were used for storage,why isn't there more spilled maize on the floor?Why aren't there more remains of big containers?Third,the idea that the great houses were ceremonial centers isn't well supported either.You know that mound at Pueblo Alto?It contains lots of other materials besides broken pots,stuff you wouldn't expect from ceremonies.For example,there are large quantities of building materials, sands,stones,even construction tools.This suggests that the mound is just a trash heap of construction material,stuff that was thrown away or not used up when a house was being built. The pots in the pile could be regular trash too,leftover from the meals of the construction workers. So the Pueblo Alto mound is not good evidence that the great houses were used for special ceremonies.TPO6ReadingCommunal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects.What is specific to these online encyclopedias,however,is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one.As a result,the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users.The idea might sound attractive,but the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional,printed encyclopedias.First,contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials,thereby making their contributions partially informed at best and downright inaccurate in many cases. Traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts who adhere to standards of academic rigor that nonspecialists cannot really achieve.Second,even if the original entry in the online encyclopedia is correct,the communal nature of these online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate,delete,and corrupt information in the encyclopedia.Once changes have been made to the original text,an unsuspecting user cannot tell the entry has been tampered with.None of this is possible with a traditional encyclopedia.Third,the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently,and in too great a depth,on trivial andpopular topics,which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not.A child doing research for a school project may discover that a major historical event receives as much attention in an online encyclopedia as,say,a single long-running television program.The traditional encyclopedia provides a considered view of what topics to include or exclude and contains a sense of proportion that online"democratic"communal encyclopedias do not.ListeningProfessor:The communal online encyclopedia will probably never be perfect,but that's a small price to pay for what it does offer.The criticisms in the reading are largely the result of prejudice against and ignorance about how far online encyclopedias have come.First,errors.It's hardly a fair criticism that encyclopedias online have errors.Traditional encyclopedias have never been close to perfectly accurate,if you are looking for a realty comprehensive reference work without any mistakes,you are not going to find it,on or off line. The real point is that it's easy for errors in factual material to be corrected in an online encyclopedia.But with the printed and bound encyclopedia,the errors remain for decades.Second,hacking.Online encyclopedias have recognized the importance of protecting their articles from malicious hackers.One strategy they started using is to put the crucial facts in the articles that nobody disputes in a read-only format,which is a format that no one can make changes to. That way you are making sure that the crucial facts in the articles are reliable.Another strategy that's being used is to have special editors whose job is to monitor all changes made to the articles and eliminate those changes that are clearly malicious.Third,what's worth knowing about?The problem for traditional encyclopedias is that they have limited space,so they have to decide what's important and what's not.And in practice,the judgments of the group of academics that make these decisions don't reflect the great range of interests that people really have.But space is definitely not an issue for online encyclopedias.The academic articles are still represented in online encyclopedias,but there can be a great variety of articles and topics that accurately reflect the great diversity of users'interests.The diversity of use in topics that online encyclopedias offer is one of their strongest advantagesTPO7ReadingIn an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices,an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling panies that receive this certification can attract customers by advertising their products as eco-certified.Around the world,many wood companies haveadopted new,ecologically friendly practices in order to receive eco-certification.However,it is unlikely that wood companies in the United States will do the same,for several reasons.First,American consumers are exposed to so much advertising that they would not value or even pay attention to the eco-certification label.Because so many mediocre products are labeled'new" or improved,''American consumers do not place much trust in advertising claims in general.Second,eco-certified wood will be more expensive than uncertified wood because in order to earn eco-certification,a wood company must pay to have its business examined by a certification agency.This additional cost gets passed on to consumers-American consumers tend to be strongly motivated by price,and therefore they are likely to choose cheaper uncertified wood products. Accordingly,American wood companies will prefer to keep their prices low rather than obtain eco-certificationThird,although some people claim that it always makes good business sense for American companies to keep up with the developments in the rest of the world,this argument is not convincing.Pursuing certification would make sense for American wood companies only if they marketed most of their products abroad.But that is not the case—American wood businesses sell most of their products in the United States,catering to a very large customer base that is satisfied with the merchandise.ListeningWell,despite what many people say,there is a good reason to think that many American wood companies will eventually seek eco-certification for the wood products.First off,companies in the United States don't treat all advertising the same.They distinguish between advertising claims that companies make about their own products and claims made by independent certification agencies.Americans have a lot of confidence in independent agencies. Thus ecological-minded Americans are likely to react very favorably to wood products ecologically certified by independent organization with an international reputation for trustworthiness.Second point,of course it is true that American consumers care a lot about price,who doesn't?But studies of how consumers make decisions show that price alone determines consumers'decisions only when the price of one competing products is much higher or lower than the other.When the difference between two products is small,say,less than5percent,as is the case with certified wood,American often do choose on factories other than price.And Americans are becoming increasingly convinced of the value of preserving and protecting the environment.And third,US Wood companies should definitely pay attention what is going on in the wood business internationally.Not because of foreign consumers but because of foreign competitors.AsI just told you,there is a good chance that many American consumers will be interested ineco-certified products,and guess why?If American companies are slow capturing those consumers,you can be sure that foreign companies will soon start crowding into the American markets,offering eco-certified wood that domestic companies don't.TPO8ReadingToward the end of his life,the Chevalier de Seingalt(1725-1798)wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures.The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure,but since he met many famous people,including kings and writers,his memoir has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century.However,some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir.They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.For example,in his memoir the Chevalier claims that while living in Switzerland,he was very wealthy,and it is known that he spent a great deal of money there on parties and gambling. However,evidence has recently surfaced that the Chevalier borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant.Critics thus argue that if the Chevalier had really been very rich,he would not have needed to borrow money.Critics are also skeptical about the accuracy of the conversations that the Chevalier records in the memoir between himself and the famous writer Voltaire.No one doubts that the Chevalier and Voltaire met and conversed.However,critics complain that the memoir cannot possibly capture these conversations accurately,because it was written many years after the conversations occurred. Critics point out that it is impossible to remember exact phrases from extended conversations held many years earlier.Critics have also questioned the memoir's account of the Chevalier's escape from a notorious prison in Venice,Italy.He claims to have escaped the Venetian prison by using a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof.Critics claim that while such a daring escape makes for enjoyable reading,it is more likely that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him.They point out that the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.ListeningProfessor:No memoir can possibly be correct in every detail,but still,the Chevalier's memoir is pretty accurate overall,and is,by and large,a reliable historical source Let's look at the accuracy of the three episodes mentioned in the reading.。

2020年托福写作模拟试题及答案（卷七）改变家乡的环境托福考试作文题目：If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.参考分析：改变其环境，因为一个好的环境会使人们更加快乐、更加健康、更加有效率。

托福考试作文范文参考：If I could change one important thing about my hometown, it would be air pollution problem, and I will give the following reasons to explain why I want to solve the problem.The first and most important reason is that I hope that my hometown can become a beautiful city. As an old industrial city, my hometown has made a great deal of contribution or the country’s economic development. At a result，the natural environment of the city has been badly damaged. The forest has disappeared; the mountains have become bald, and the most awful thing is that the air quality becomes more and more worsen. People seldom see the blue sky during most time of year.Another reason why I want to change my hometown's air pollutionsituation is that the city's development needs clean and tidy environment to attract investors. nowadays people have come to know that the city's environment, which is so called “software facility of the city”，plays an important role in the city's future. For example, due to the fact that the environment of the city is very poor, many local students who pursue their study out of the city would rather find the job in other cities than coming back to their hometown after they graduated. In addition, nowadays people have paid more and more attention to their health. If the air pollution problem cannot be solved as quickly as possible, people's requirement for a healthy body will never be realized.In my mind, changing air pollution will apparently be my first choice if I can change one important thing about my hometown. Fortunately people in my hometown are gradually aware of the serious problem and start doing something about it.电影电视如何影响人们行为托福考试作文题目：How do movies or television influence people's behavior? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.参考分析：通过改变人们的价值观、世界观、审美观而改变人们行为。