In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which do you think is appropriate in today's world?
立场：比起全才，培养专业人才应该是大趋势
学科数量多
1. 有助于学生发现自己的潜力、潜在兴趣
学科数量少
1. 提高专注度，避免浪费时间在无关学科上
In some countries, secondary schools provide a general education across a wide range of subjects. Other countries offer a much narrower range of subjects which are related to a particular career. I think the trends is most students would spend more time on fewer areas to increase the chances of having a successful career.
With the more liberal approach in which students are exposed to a wide range of subjects, students often acquire other areas of interest than those they might have had originally. For example, a student who may have originally been interested to study to become a doctor might find that he is more interested in becoming a writer when he is exposed to those subjects in a secondary school that provides a general education. So, those who argue for schools to offer a wider range of subjects will maintain that young students should be exposed to a larger range of subjects before making life decisions regarding the pursuit of a career.
On the other hand, the schools offering a narrower and more specific range of subjects will maintain that all of those non-related classes are non-essential, maybe even a waste of time. For example, if a person wants to study to be an accountant, there are fewer benefits of requiring him to take a biology course.
Today's world is a specialized world and it is understandable why many secondary schools are now focusing on a narrower path of subjects in training students for future careers and professions. Although some students will benefit from a wider selection of subjects in determining a career path, most students will opt for the fastest and most direct path available.
Some people say that art subjects such as painting or drawing should not be made compulsory for high school students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
立场：不同意
正方：艺术课程可能纯粹是浪费时间
反方：
1. 总是会有学生对艺术感兴趣
2. 上艺术课程也会让学生接触到新领域的学习
Some people say that compulsory subjects should not include the ones related to art such as painting or drawing for high school students. My opinion is that learning from art subjects will
certainly benefit students, so there is a need to make these subjects compulsory.
Those people who say that art courses should not be compulsory contend that students should not be required to study a subject unless they have an interest in that subject. Those people often classify study of art as a waste of valuable time. They tend to question the benefit of studying a subject that a student never intends to use.
The people who speak on behalf of requiring students to study art maintain that a student can benefit from being exposed to new subjects and new areas of study. All people have a practical side and a creative side. Even though a student intends to be an accountant, he might also find that he enjoys more creative activities such as painting, drawing, acting, singing, or dancing. So an effective way is that schools can introduce students to art activities that those students may enjoy, even if those activities are not related to their major course of study.
Although some students may object to having to take art courses in which they are not interested, those courses will expose them to different areas of study. Even if the student continues to be less interested in the arts, perhaps they will acquire an appreciation for those who pursue those areas of study. It is important for young students to be well-rounded and well-versed, even if through a compulsory course.
The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
立场：团队运动只是一种教授合作的重要性途径，还有其他活动可以起到同样的作用团队运动：
1.让小孩认识到，团队的目标重于个人目标
其他方式
1. 应允许小孩根据自己的兴趣参与相关的活动
2. 只要是涉及和别人合作的活动都能起到同等作用。
Some people think that the best way to teach children cooperation is through team sports at school, but I would say that there are other approaches that can work in the same way.
There is no doubt that team sports have benefits in teaching children some valuable lessons. In being part of a team, the child will be encouraged to place the goals of the team over his or her individual goals. Team sports can teach people that if they work as a team, they can accomplish more than if they work as individuals. When people are part of a sports team, they will learn that the good of a sports team, they will learn that the good of the team is more important than the good of each of the team's members or players.
But team sports are not the only way to teach cooperation to children. Other groups and organizations can teach cooperation just as effectively as team sports. It is important to point out that some children are not athletically inclined or they are not interested in participating in sports. For those children, other clubs and organizations offer a means for them to learn about the importance of cooperation. Organization such as student government, musical groups such
as concert bands or choirs, and theater groups, can all provide the same team-building skills that are provided by team sports. Therefore, any activity or organization in which the participants or members work together can teach cooperation.
Although team sports can provide an excellent means to teach children about the benefits of cooperation, team sports are not for everyone and they are certainly not the only school activity or community activity which teaches those skills.
Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
立场：适度玩电脑游戏，总是好的
正方：玩多了影响学习和社交能力，同时身体状况也有负面影响
反方：玩游戏有助于小孩学会如何使用高科技产很多游戏也有教育意义
Some people say that playing computer games is usually harmful for children. Other people maintain that computer games help children develop. There are points to be made on each side of the argumento
Playing computer games can certainly have negative effects on a child. Studies have shown that computer games can be addictive and a child who is spending too much time playing computer games may not develop in other areas, including reading and comprehension and social interaction. Also, a child who spends a lot of time playing computer games is probably not physically active. It is harmful for children when lacking time to exercise both mind and body. So, a person who spends too much time playing computer games will most certainly be deprived in other areas of development.
On the other hand, since we are now living in a time when computers are used in almost all aspects of our lives, it is important for a child to learn how to use a computer and to be comfortable with computers. Some people, including children, will be afraid of computers until they learn how to use them. Computer games offer a good means for a child to become comfortable with a computer, And, in fairness, some computer games are educational.
With this in mind, it is probably not fair to say that playing computer games has no benefits for children. Nevertheless, parents may want to restrict the amount of time they allow their children to play computer games because this will encourage children to develop in other areas.
其他观点
When it comes to the value of computer games, I think the game can be harmful to the young if there is no discipline for self-control. However, it is also unfair to deny the benefits of playing these games.
The main concern comes from the fact that computer games are highly exciting to young players
so it is easy to develop an addiction. Once the youngsters become obsessed with the games, they would careless about school work and life but pay almost full attention to the game world. In a worse situation, the addiction may confuse children and let them believe that what they can do in the virtual world is acceptable in reality. So some children might apply violence to solve problems in real life as that is how they survive in some games.
However, we should also consider the positive sides of game-playing. Some games help young players unconsciously learn the importance of teamwork while other games may set up difficult tasks which require plenty of logic thinking. By being involved in these games, children would make efforts to figure out different problems, which from a cognitive point of view, is beneficial for it motivates them to use their brains more.
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong to allow children to play computer games as there is an effective way to teach some skills that they may not be able to learn from school. On the other hand, parental guidance is essential otherwise the addiction may destroy a child quickly. With proper discipline, digital games would play an important role in the child's development.
Some working parents believe childcare centers can provide best care for children, while others think family members like grandparents can do it better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
立场：根据实际情况决定
正方：托儿所设施齐全有社交环境和看护人员，但不一定能照顾到每个小孩反方：家人可以给予特殊关照，但不一定有正确的引导，同时家里也没有社交的氛围
Some working parents believe that childcare centers can provide better care for children than family members such as grandparents or older siblings. I would say it is difficult to judge which is the best way o
Childcare centers are generally well-equipped to care for children. They have workers who are accustomed to caring for children. They often organize games and activities, including some learning activities, for the children to participate in. Also, the child may benefit from the social interaction with other children at the childcare center. The biggest disadvantage of childcare centers might be the fact that there are multiple children at the centers and this can sometimes mean that a child will not receive the appropriate care or attention.
As for care from family members, some parents feel more comfortable with having someone they know well look after their child. Also, if the parents want the child to receive special attention, the child is more likely to receive that under the care of a family member. There are also disadvantages in having a family member care for a child. The family member may not be qualified to teach a child. There may be distractions in the home environment and the family member might not be able to provide the expected care or attention that the child requires. Depending on who else is in the home the child may not receive the benefits of social interaction that he or she might get from a childcare center.
Whether a child will be better off in a childcare center or with a family member is a complicated decision. This decision will depend on the child, the quality of the available childcare center, the availability of family members and their interest and qualifications in caring for children.
其他观点
One of the concerns for working parents is who can provide the most needed care to their children when they are at work. Some say that going to childcare centers is a good option compared with leaving children to other family members, I believe combining childcare service and the home education is the best choice.
Most childcare centers not only provide a place for kids to study during the day but also have well-trained teachers to help the youngsters to improve their literacy and understanding of arts. Additionally, kids are guided to develop good habits like eating independently, following rules and so on. This is certainly beneficial to their future development.
Of course, there are advantages of having other family members look after the children while their parents are away. The one-on-one care is something the childcare center cannot guarantee. At home, the children can learn at their own pace without feeling too much pressure. And the love from their grandparents and other relatives will support them to grow strong and live happily.
I personally think that a child needs to be guided properly so that he will gain more valuable experience in his early life. At home, family members may either spoil the child or teach the child insufficiently. So going to a childcare center is a way to avoid wrong family education. Meanwhile, family always matters in a child's life. If working parents cannot devote much time for their children, other family members should step up and give the child the amount of attention that a daycare organization fails to provide. With the help from both sides, the nurturing in early childhood will be satisfying.
It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Would the drawbacks greater than benefits to the community and the young adults themselves?
Some people suggest that every young adult ought to spend some time in helping people from their communities for free. In my opinion, it is difficult to judge whether this suggestion benefits the community and the young parents more.
In terms of the benefits to the community, the greatest benefit is that the residents may save some money from hiring paid workers to do various things. The young volunteer can take care of the young and the old or they can offer gardening and cleaning services, which certainly is financially helpful for everyone in the community.
Whereas considering the drawbacks, I would be concerned that free services does not guarantee quality all the time. As some young adults view money as a strong motivation for work, being required to work for free may lead to a negative attitude. Consequently, the residents may
be disappointed and have some complaints.
I believe this type of work can improve the young workers' communication skills and expand their social networks as they get a chance to work for people from different backgrounds in their communities while offering free services. However, if they cannot choose what they want to do and being assigned with boring tasks, they might think of the work as a waste of time and refuse to work hard as required.
To conclude, if all the young adults can work for free in their communities, the help-receiving residents can save more money and the young volunteers can gain useful skills. But asides from these benefits, we need to also consider if the free service is quality-guaranteed and is something the volunteers are willing to provide.
Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that story books are more beneficial than television and computer games for the young. I would say that this opinion is partly reasonable because story books have their limits too.
The first advantage that story books have is that children will read what is suitable to their ages and find it easy to absorb knowledge from the books whereas many TV programs and video games are adult-oriented, so young viewers may not learn much. Secondly, there is less inappropriate information in a child's book, which frees parents from worrying about their children being exposed to violence and other immoral behavior at an early age.
By contrast, TV stations and game companies these days intensely promote controversial topics and violent fights to secure their market shares and children being exposed to these kinds of content would become victims.
However, there is a need to consider what stories cannot offer to children. The main issue with a story book is that the fabricated information can easily mislead young readers to believe in a non-existed society where Santa Clause and super heroes save the poor and punish the evil on a daily basis. Television shows what a real world is like despite the crelty and unpleasant accidents on the news, which will prepare a child to face the reality. Moreover, compared with some computer games for groups, reading does not increase a child's understanding in teamwork which is important to their future development.
To conclude, I do not deny the contribution story books can make to a child's development, but there are serious consequence when we rely too much on fairy tales and exclude other learning resources like TV programs and computer games.
Nowadays, most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should be encouraged to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree?
立场：应该让学生意识到，大学不是唯一的出路。有部分学生肯比较适合去技能型学校正：
1.有很多工作要求学生接受传统学术类教育，技能型培训用处不大
反：
1. 有很多工作不需要大量理论，更多的是工作中的实际动手能力
2. 不是所有人都适应纯学术类的学习
Nowadays, many young people prepare for their careers by studying at the university. But there are some people who think that some of these same students would be better served if they opted to learn vocational skills instead of academic skills. In examining this issue, it seems that both courses of training have their own benefits.
Traditional academic training can provide the education necessary for many professions, including teachers, doctors, and lawyers. With these professions, many years of academic training are necessary before a person can enter those professions.
On the other hand, academic education is not the best means of training for all professions. In some instances, on-the -job training offered by a vocational school or trade school will be more appropriate and valuable. This includes professions such as carpenters, electricians, plumbers and secretaries or administrative assistants. In many instances, this vocational training requires less classroom time than most academic training and on-the-job training is almost always a major component of vocational training.
In comparing the benefits of academic training with the benefits of vocational training, it is important to note that there is a place for both It is also important to point out that some people do not thrive in academic learning environments or professions, but they will flourish in a vocational school or trade school. So, we need to make young students aware that there are education options available to them other than just traditional academic education options. Those non-academic education options relate to many different professions which are required for a society to flourish. And these professions are better served with a trade school or vocational school education.
Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the
most interesting. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
立场：中立，学生的兴趣和全面发展一样重要。.
全部都学对学生全面发展有好处，偏科到后面会限制自己的发展，不利于学习。
学生有限的精力不能学习那么多知识，专学自己喜欢的，有利于出成绩，增加学生的自信, 成为一个领域的专家。
个人观点
结合学生的兴趣，挑选一些喜欢的课程，学习相关核心的学科，这样既学习了自己喜欢的, 也相
对全面容易考入大学。
Some people find it difficult to decide whether they should allow students to choose their favourite subjects to learn or force them to receive an all-round education. I would say that students' interest and well-rounded training are equally important.
Some people are strong advocates of a well-rounded education because this kind of education can help students gain knowledge in multiple areas. If students choose to learn the subjects they are interested in but ignore others, they are more likely to fail in connecting with other fields. For example, if they only learn science and ignore languages, they may find it hard to understand some publications in other languages. As learning a language will assist them to learn the original ideas rather than the translated versions which may be inaccurate.
However, there are concerns that students may not perform well academically if they are forced to learn a broad range of curriculum. Teenagers have limited energy and if they only learn what they like, they probably can achieve better academic performance. This can even enhance their confidence in studying. The sense of achievement further encourages them to be experts in a specific field, like engineering.
My personal view is that we should reconcile students' interest with the all-round education. Students can be encouraged to choose some of their favourites like geography or arts, while they have to learn the core subjects such as maths and languages. In this way, they can learn some subjects with great passion meanwhile they still have a better chance to enter a top university because of having knowledge and skills in other essential fields.
In conclusion, students' interests are critical in intelligent development, and a well-rounded education is a stepping stone for most students. We should take both factors into consideration when making the curriculum.
Some people believe that parents have great fluence on children's growth but others think that influence from the outside plays a more important role. Do you agree or disagree?
父母的影响会持续伴随孩子的一生
父母第一个教会他们语言，好的习惯和礼貌的。
积极例子：父母如果说脏话，那么孩子也很有可能说脏话
反例：孩子从小养成的习惯是很难纠正的。
来自外界的影响对孩子的发展更重要。
积极的例子：自私的小孩到了学校以后学会了和别人相处的正确方式，即使父母再自私，他们也不一定被影响
反例：有礼貌的小孩和无礼貌的小孩在一起，也容易学坏。
Parents are the first teacher of their children and they are believed to exert a great influence on their children's development, while I would argue that the influence from the outside world is much stronger.
The influence conning from parents can have a long-lasting impact on young children. Parents are responsible for teaching them good manners and languages, and children will imitate parents' behavior unconsciously. If the parents use bad language in their daily life, their children are likely to talk in a rude way. If the parents get along with neighbours and other relatives, their children tend to treat others in a friendly way. Besides, bad habits that children have developed from a very young age are difficult to be corrected, and this is why family education plays an important role in children's early development.
Unfortunately, the influence from the outside is of greater importance for children's later development. Some children are quite selfish before they start school, but they are able to get rid of this poor quality later because of peer pressure at school. Once they have learnt the right interpersonal skills at school, they may not revert back to their old self again even if they have self-centered parents. On the other hand, some children may be only polite at home. Their personalities will be quite different once they are with their misbehaved friends. Social environment will certainly change the way children see the world and the way they interact with others.
In conclusion, although the influence exerted by their parents can have lasting impact on children's growth, the outside influence plays a more important role for their development.
Some people believe that computers and internet carry more weight than traditional education in children's study. Some others believe that traditional schooling and teachers are still essential and more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
观点：网络课程和传统教学同等重要。
传统教育
优点：老师通过专业培养，因材施教，更好的规范学生行为。
弊端：老师无法全天候给学生提供辅导。
网络课程
优点：涉及范围广，学生可以根据自己的需要选择。变被动学习为主动学习。网络提供24 小时教授知识。
弊端：虽然网络资源多，但学生不一定学习到恰当的信息
The advent of the Internet introduces more learning opportunities to children and even threaten the popularity of traditional education. I believe that online courses and traditional way of teaching can be compatible with each other.
Traditional teaching conducted by teachers in a brick and mortar school cannot be replaced by computers. Many teachers have received professional training from educational institutions where they learn systematic teaching methods. They are also equipped with hands -on teaching experience that helps them tailor teaching for different students. Compared with computer-based teaching, teachers spend more time with students, so they will further discover the strengths and weaknesses of these students, including non-academic aspects. For example, the younger generation's inappropriate behavior will be immediately corrected and their good deeds will be praised, through which they are more likely to act in a socially acceptable way.
On the other hand, Internet and computers enable students to find more learning resources not only from their own countries but also from other countries. They can learn different languages and interesting courses based on their own needs. Learning is no longer negative and passive, instead it can transform students into active learners.
In my opinion, traditional schooling and teachers carry the same weight as computers. Even though teachers can solve students' behavioural problems, they are unable to impart knowledge to students 24 hours. While computers provide non-stop service children can search the information whenever they want and wherever they are. Of course, there is no guarantee that children only learn from appropriate information from the internet.
In conclusion both traditional ways of teaching and computers play an important role in the young's studying life and I think these two ways of learning should be combined.
雅思G类大作文话题范文：教育话题 Evaluation of teachers You should spend about 40 minutes onthis task. Some people think that high schoolstudents should be given the freedom to evaluate and even criticize theirteachers, while others claim that this practice will disrupt the order inclassroom and lead to disrespect for teachers. What is your opinion? Write at least 250 words. Education: Sample Introduction Whether high school students should begiven the freedom to evaluate and criticize their teachers is a challengingissue in education. Some people support this practice while others believe thatit will be hard for the teachers to maintain classroom order and gain students’respect. Personally, I agree to the latter opinion, which is based on thefollowing three reasons. Main Body 1 First of all, it is difficult for highschool students to adopt a completely objective attitude towards their teacherswhen they are
Topic 1: When international media (including movies, fashion shows, advertisements and other TV programs) convey the same messages to the global audience, people argue that the expansion of international media has negative impacts on cultural diversity. What is your opinion? 媒体信息一致的缺点： ?国际媒体（global media)—般掌握在少数几个有实力的机构手中（in the hands of a few, large, powerful organizations)；有了媒体的宣传(propaganda)后,西方文化成了主流(domineering force),大规模的、有吸引力的广告(mass seductive advertising )唤起了落后地区人们对物质新的向往（create fresh desires),经济联系增强（strong economic ties),西方产品取代了本地产品，使人们更加向往西方的文化； ?文化开始融合在一起(mingle),人们被新的价值观所围绕(bombarded with new values)，对自己的文化失去信心和自豪感（confidence and pride),拒绝接受自己的文化传统（rejection of their cultural heritage)转而接受西方的文化习惯（adoption of Western cultural practices);西方媒体削弱了民族的特征(ethnic identity)和社会的凝聚力（social cohesion);因为担心失去观众(a loss of viewers),当地的电视台也开始播放西方的电视节目（television shows), ?国际媒体的普遍会降低世界文化的品质和多样性（degrade the quality and diversity of world culture);文化被商业化（commercialized), —些文化产品（cultural goods),如音乐、服装，都变成了商品（commodities in the marketplace)。因此，即便一些文化在世界其他地方传播，它原来的性质（authenticity)已经丧失。 媒体信息一致的优点： ?国家之间的频繁交往会促进文化之间的交流。因此，相互了解和相互认同的可能性(likelihood of mutual understanding and mutual acceptance )就会增加，这是顺应全球化的趋势； ?未必一定放弃传统观念（not necessarily lead to the abolition of traditional values),事实上媒体可以起到宣传和稳固传统文化的作用； ?主流媒体一般都会反应文化多元性（The dominant media reflect cultural diversity.); —些外国节目其实促进了文化多元性(Most foreign programming is promoting cultural diversity.),适应了当地的条件（adapt to local conditions)，注意到了当地文化的敏感性（aware of cultural sensitivity).自我调节来适应市场(exercise self-censorship to suit the market :)。 As international media companies expand across the world, the growing popularity and uniformity of some media programs (such as TV shows, movies, fashion shows) is causing worldwide concern. Many people have strong views toward this trend. In my opinion, international media is closely linked to cultural globalization and cultural homogeneity. The dominance of international media is a sign of Western cultural imperialism and has the potential to thwart cultural diversity. It is not a secret that international media is owned and operated by a handful of giant corporations, such as Time Warner. They control large sectors of the media market and place national media companies at risk. The contraction in the number of media owners will cause a proportional reduction, in the variety of programs broadcasted. For example, painting, music and movies accessible in the media have a small number of genres, imposing restraints on one's knowledge of artworks of different cultural backgrounds. In addition to seizing control over those creative industries, global entertainment companies affect cultural diversity by reshaping the perceptions, beliefs and norms of ordinary citizens in different countries. Most of the cultural values and ideals promoted by the leading mainstream media are of American origin. American culture values individuality, maximization of one's benefits and material wealth, rather than communal life and family solidarity, the values and norms previously treasured in" many Asian countries. Unfortunately, many Asian people now imitate American people, causing the alteration of their perceptions of family. This radical change can be attributed to those movies and TV programs that portray the success of American individuals or corporations.
雅思作文题目必备的十个雅思话题 一、教育类别 1. 教育会囊括一些什么内容？ 母题：It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well-being of societies. What should education consist of to fulfill both these functions? (050312) 提示：本题围绕教育的两大功能来展开（个人与社会），准备好这篇文章，即可应付教育类话题中的最大分支—教育的功能，做到以不变应万变。对于社会角度，可以从促进经济发展、增加社会流动性(social mobility)、维护社会稳定这几个方面来展开，对于个人，可以写改变思维模式、有利于就业和便利生活来写。 子题：大学应当教授理论知识还是实践技能？大学的是应当把学生培养成合格的公民还是让他们自己得益？准备未来职业最好的方法是 上大学还是尽快离校积累工作经验？大学要不要扩招？中学阶段应 当提供通才教育还是专才教育？要不要延长义务教育年限？要不要 让农村地区的学生更容易上学？老师要教学生如何判断是非吗？ 2. 学校的科目谁来选择？
母题：Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion. (060916) 提示：这类题目采取的策略就是“双批判”，因为题目中提供的两种选择往往都是错误的。 子题1：政府选课or 老师选课？学生选择所有的科目or根据兴趣自行选择？ 子题2：要不要学国际新闻？要不要学历史？要不要中学阶段就学习外语？要不要学数学哲学这类的科目？ 3. 什么样的教学方式最好？ 母题：Many people use distance-learning programmes (study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the benefit as much as attending college or university. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? (041113, 081023, 100515) 提示：远程教育最大的好处，就在于三个any：anybody, anywhere, any time. 缺点是缺乏师生之间以及学生之间的interaction, 缺乏
雅思大作文专项突破：追随时尚 本文收集整理了雅思大作文专项突破：追随时尚。这是目前常见的、高频的雅思写作话题，同学们在备考时可以边写边学，积累写作素材，以便在考试中更胸有成竹。 Topic 24: Fashion is difficult to follow, and some people argue that we should not follow it. They think that we should dress what we like and feel comfortable. Do you agree or disagree? 解析: 支持追随潮流(following fashion)的观点： ? 时装是自我表达( a means of self-expression)的一种休现，表现人的性格和喜好(reflect one's personality or likes)，让人们在生活巾体验不同角色(allow people to try on many roles in life)，同时便世界更加丰富多彩(diversity and variety of the world in which we live); ? 新时代的时尚(fashion in the new era)并不一定意味着高消费，也并非一定穿某种款式的衣服才算时尚;
? 时装源于生活(root in daily life),反映生活趋势(reflect that life)，充分考虑了消费者的需求C consider consumer demand)，不像人们想的那样肤浅(not as superficial as some people think) 反对追随潮流(following fashion )的观点： ? 潮流变化太快，盲目追求潮流(follow fashion blindly)是浪费时间和金钱; ? 失去了自己的喜好和判断(dwell too much on what others think); ? 鼓励人们将衣服和地位、社会阶层还有财富联系在一起(associate clothing with status, social class and wealth),这是一种歧视。 范文 Fashion refers to a style of clothing worn by most people of a country. The growing concern about fashion in recent years comes as no surprise, considering the fact that fashion is very often at odds with the traditional function of clothing, protecting wearers from the extremes of weather. In my opinion, fashion is not a betrayal but an indicative of a principle that wearing clothing is for both functional and social reasons. Fashions are linked to personal style. Fashions allow wearers to express emotion and solidarity with other people. People dress to their mood and according to circumstances. Buying fashionable clothes is a
题目 Many people use distance-learning programs to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending college or university.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion？ 作文 Education is one of the most important chances to change one's destiny or the world.However,whether use distance-learning programs to study at home can bring the same benefits compared to study at school is a controversial issue. My view is that student at school have more benefits than that at home through distance-learning programs. It is obvious that students can learn how to communicate with others at school and develop thinking critically and critically.This is because a school is society in miniature,which can help students' physical ,intellectual and emotional development.It also can help foster in the young the morally sound values and outlook on the world and life. Moreover,learning at school can help students develop career prospect.For example,with the development of society,the knowledge is always updating. The teachers can change their teaching plans and aims according to the society needs.So,studying at school can help students attend universities or find jobs easily.
6分作文的评分标准 ? addresses all parts of the task although some parts may be more fully covered than others ? presents a relevant position although the conclusions may become unclear or repetitive ? presents relevant main ideas but some may be inadequately developed/unclear ? arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression ?uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical ? may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately; ? uses paragraphing, but not always logically ? uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task ? attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy ? makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication ? uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms ? makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication 雅思大作文话题之教育类 Some people think schools should only teach students academic subjects. Others think schools should also teach students how to discriminate between right and wrong. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 3 Some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experiences and personal qualities when they look for an employee. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development? Schools should concentrate on teaching students the academic subjects that will be useful for their future careers. Subjects such as music and sports are not useful. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 2 Some people think children should obey the rules set by their parents and teachers set, but others think that less control will help children to deal with their future adult life. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 2 Some people think students should go to boarding schools instead of living at home. Do you agree or disagree? 2
Education题目 1. Some people think university education should prepare students for e mployment while others think it should help students acquire theoretical knowledge. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 一些人认为大学教育应该帮助学生为就业做准备，而另一些人则认为大学教育应该帮助学生获取理论知识。讨论这两种观点并给出你自己的观点。（目的） 2. Students from rural areas often find it hard to access university educat ion. Some people think universities should make it easy for them to stud y at. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 农村地区的学生往往难以获得大学教育的机会。一些人认为大学应该让这些学生更容易适应大学学习。多大程度上你同意或者不同意这种说法。（难） 3. Students at schools and universities learn more from lessons with teac hers than from other sources （ such as the Internet or television）. To what extent do you agree or di sagree. 相比其他途径（比如网络和电视），在学校或大学的学生们会从教师的课程中学到更多东西。多大程度上你同意或者不同意这种观点。（途径） 4. Some people believe that students should take a wide range of course s.However, others believe that students should focus on the subject that they are good at or they are interested in. Discuss both views and give yo ur own opinion. 一些人认为学生应该广泛的学习各种不同的课程。可
雅思大作文5分与7分范文各项指数对比分析 Let’s compare two answers to a question.The topic is as follows: International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the advantages of international tourism outweigh the disadvantages? A Poor Essay – The following is a band 5 essay. International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages? In my opinion advantages outweight the disadvantages. Firstly, many countries like Egypt or Tailand live from tourism Lots of people work there as a seilsmens or tourist guides. These countries without support of tourists wouldn’t be able to funtcion properly. Secondly, in countries visited by tourists are plenty of places where people just can’t pass because of rare animals or plant s. Another thing is that people like traveling and seeing new exotic places. They like lie on the beach or swim in ocean. Furthermore, tourism is now more growing industry highering tousands of people. There are makeing new places to work and to have fun. But on the other hand, people often for get that they aren’t the only beings on the planet. Many tourists are living garbage just anywhere. Some of them wan’t an exotic souvenir so they pay for illegal things like dea d or live animals or some sculpture. To sum up I think international traveling is a good thing but people must realise that there is something else besides them. They need to know that flora and fauna needs to be protected. People have to enjoy their holidays but alsow protect environment. Below is an analysis of this essay. Task Response The essay question has been copied and used as the introduction (paragraph 1). Once these 34 words are taken off the word count, the response is underlength at 194 words and so loses marks. Nevertheless, the topic is addressed and a relevant position is expressed, although there are patches – as in the third paragraph – where the development is unclear. Other ideas are more relevant but are sometimes insufficiently developed.
积累雅思大作文教育 类话题
积累雅思大作文教育类话题 朗阁雅思考试研究中心 这篇文章主要探讨大学教育学费应该由谁来支付的问题。这个话题其实是模凌两可的，两方面观点都可以展开去说，并不像之前的题目那样有个明显的倾向性。所以，这对于考生来说并不是一个太难的题目，正反两方面内容，分论点，论据都比较充足。 ?学校的责任与重点 ?Some people say university students should pay for their tuition fees. Some other say the government should pay for the tuition fees. What is your opinion? 在回答这个题目的时候，考生需要注意以下几点：1. 不要用现实社会现状来当做理由和论据。可能很多学生会说现在全世界大多数国家的大学学费是需要学生来支付的，这其中必有道理。其实，这个题目的目的就是让考生去表达出自己的想法，然后加以证明即可。2. 不要纠结government. 根据朗阁雅思考试研究中心专家们的经验，很多考生可能都会说到学费可以由大学拉赞助，以奖学金的形式支付给学生。这里考生把重点放到了政府和学生之外的第三方。这种讨论并没有错，只是有一些非常规，不太符合雅思的要求。一般的雅思话题都有两个完全的对立面。如果考生认为应该由第三方来解决的话，那么可以把这一条放在最后的结尾，当成一个建议来说，而不是放到主体段，否则会干扰考生的观点。3. 很多学生会想到很多贫穷的家庭付不起学费这个观点。这个观点看
起来似乎合情合理，但其实不然。因为学生负担不起并不代表政府就有义务来支付。如果按照这个逻辑，那很多家庭买不起车，政府难道还要帮每个家庭买车吗？所以，这个论证的关键在于强调教育是基本权利的问题。 Pros: (Government) ?政府有责任和义务来支付学生的学费。教育是学生的基本权利，不应该有人因为金钱问题，支付不起学费而被剥夺接受教育的权利。无论如何，政府最重要的职责都是带动社会发展与推进。在现今社会，科技逐渐成为一个国家经济，社会发展的重要推动力。如何能够掌握这些先进科学技术知识就成为了政府职责的重中之重。显然，培养各个领域的人才是掌握这些科技的重要手段和方法。所以，向大 众提供教育，从而让学生以后能够成为社会的重要人才就成为了政府的基本责 任。 ?现在的教育费用已经变的非常昂贵。在中国，一所公立大学一年的学费将近一万元，而在一些私立大学，这个数字可能会涨到两到三万元，这相当于很多家庭一年的收入。对于很多贫穷的家庭来说，他们根本没有能力来支付这笔费用。因为没有钱而剥夺学生接受教育的权利是不公平的。因为对于这部分人群来说，让孩 子接受高等教育，掌握先进的专业知识，从而找到更好的工作是他们脱贫致富的唯一途径。如果孩子们无法接受教育，那这种一代比一代更穷的情况就会形成恶性循环从而持续下去。 ?很多孩子可能会对某一个方面很有天赋。如果他们无法接受教育，那么他们这方面的天赋就无法发挥，这对于国家来说也是一种损失。可能社会就会因此失去了一个比尔盖茨，或者是乔布斯。其实，大学学费贵，让政府来支付的话，固然是一个负担，但是政府可以将其视为一种投资，学生以后到社会上为社会发展做出贡献，也是对于政府投入的一种回报。 Cons: ?对于政府来说，支付所有学生的学费是一笔非常大的费用。政府的资金有限，并且已经有了合理的分配。如果政府将很大一部分资金投入到支付学费这个方面，那么我们的社会必将会面临没有足够的钱去修建更多的道路，去建设更多的医院等
雅思写作教育类话题题目 雅思写作话题题库有很多，你都知道有哪些么?下面就和大家分享雅思写作教育类话题题目总结，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。 雅思写作教育类话题题目总结 1. 教育应该包括哪些内容? 母题：It is generally believed that education is of vital importance to the development of individuals and the well-being of societies. What should education consist of to fulfil both these functions? 提示：本题围绕教育的两大功能来展开(个人与社会)，准备好这篇*，即可应付教育类话题中的最大分支—教育的功能，做到以不变应万变。对于社会角度，可以从促进经济发展、增加社会流动性(social mobility)、维护社会稳定这几个方面来展开，对于个人，可以写改变思维模式、有利于就业和便利生活来写。 子题：大学应当教授理论知识还是实践技能?大学的是应当把学生培养成合格的公民还是让他们自己得益?准备未来职业最好的方法是上大学还是尽快离校积累工作经验?大学要不要扩招?中学阶段应当提供通才教育还是专才教育?要不要延长义务教育
年限?要不要让农村地区的学生更容易上学?老师要教学生如何判断是非吗? 2. 学校的科目谁来选择? 母题：Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion. 提示：这类题目采取的策略就是“双批判”，因为题目中提供的两种选择往往都是错误的。 子题1：政府选课or 老师选课?学生选择所有的科目or根据兴趣自行选择? 子题2：只有学术科目重要，体育和音乐这样的课不重要，你同意吗?要不要学国际新闻?要不要学历史?要不要中学阶段就学习外语?要不要学数学哲学这类的科目? 提示：子题2与母题联系不大，需要准备这些科目各自的优点。 3. 什么样的教学方式最好? 母题：Many people use distance-learning programmes (study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people
雅思写作大作文-教育类范文 Some people claim that students go to university only for finding a good job. What’s your opinion? If people are asked why students go to university, I believe that many of the answers would be: to find a good job! It is true that job commitment is an important function of higher education. However, I think it has other functions. For one thing, students learn to be independent in university. For many, if not all, of my schoolmates, entering university is the first time to leave home and live on their own. It is hard for them at first, but to my mind this is certainly an essential part of one’s life, or else they may continue to receive parental care without getting mature as early as they should. For another thing, students know better how to get along with people during the four years’ university life. As we know, nowadays, many Chinese children are the only child at home and thus unlike people of the previous generations who have brothers and sisters, they know little about how to be tolerant and considerate to people around them. There is no doubt that universities provide us with an opportunity to learn to do s for example, we have to think of others instead of only ourselves when we share a dormitory room with others.
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think university graduates who become new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. What is your view? Most of the rural areas are in low qualities of schools and medical facilities while the urban areas are in good qualities of those facilities. As a result, some people hold a view that students majored in teaching and medicine should contribute themselves to countries for certain amount of years after graduated from university. In my opinion, I believe that there are numbers of advantages of students working in countryside. I do believe that graduated students only working in urban areas do not suffer from the poor conditions in countryside such as no lightings, electricity or clean water, and it could make them more concentrate on their works. However, in current society, graduates could easily attain a job in a country while tremendous competitions are in almost every city as there