英语专八考试作文评分标准(中英双语版)

英语专业八级翻译评分标准（英译汉汉译英）
（1）原文信息全部转达，语气和文体风格与原文一致。

句式处理恰当，选词妥贴。

约占总分的90%。

（2）除个别次要信息有疏漏外，原文的重要信息全部转达，语气和文体风格与原文一致。

语言基本合乎规范。

行文比较流畅。

约占总分的80%。

（3）有少量理解错误或有个别漏译，但主要精神原文一致。

有个别漏译和词不达意现象。

行文不够流畅。

约占总分的70%。

（4）有个别重大错误或遗漏。

部分信息含混，但总体上达意，有逐字硬译，不符合目的语表达习惯的现象，句子不连贯，比较费解。

约占总分的60%。

（5）误译漏译较多，不能转达原文主要精神。

有大量句法与用词错误，三分之一以上的句子生搬硬套，不知所云。

约占总分的50%以下。

英译汉评分标准：按照“忠实60% + 通顺40%”的标准整体打分优秀（100-90）良好（89-90）中等（79-70）及格（69-60）不及格（59分以下）忠实60% 原文的信息全部传达，语气和文体风格与原文一致除个别次要信息有疏漏之外，原文的重要信息全部传达，语气和文体风格与原文一致有少量理解错误或个别漏译，但主要精神与原文一致有个别重大错误或遗漏，部分信息含混，但总体上基本达意误译、漏译较多，不能传达原文主要精神通顺40% 断句恰当，句式正确。

选词妥帖。

段落之间、句子之间互应自然，有一定文采选词较正确、得体。

句子组织与安排符合汉语规范拘泥于英文的句式，行文不够顺达，但没有重大的选词和句式错误语句不够连贯，行文灰色，有个别重大的选词和句式错误用词不当，行文不通顺，语言不符合汉语规范汉译英评分标准：按照“忠实60% + 通顺40%”的标准整体打分优秀（100-90）良好（89-90）中等（79-70）及格（69-60）不及格（59分以下）忠实60% 原文的信息全部传达，语气和文体风格与原文一致除个别次要信息有疏漏之外，原文的重要信息全部传达，语气和文体风格与原文一致有少量理解错误或个别漏译，但主要精神与原文一致有个别重大错误或遗漏，部分信息含混，但总体上基本达意误译、漏译较多，不能传达原文主要精神通顺40% 句式处理恰当，选词妥帖，英语比较地道语言基本合乎英语规范。

行文比较流畅有个别句子结构错误和词不达意现象。

行文不够流畅有逐字硬译，不符合英语表达习惯的现象。

句子不连贯，比较费解有大量的语法和用词错误。

1/3以上的句子生搬硬套，不知所云英语专业八级考试翻译评分标准(Grade Score Description)5 10-9 EXCELLENT TRANSLATIONThe translation faithfully reflects all the original passage with only 1 or 2 minor errors in vocabulary, syntax, punctuation or spelling. The translation is elegant (appropriate choice of words, a variety in sentence patterns).4 8-7 GOOD TRANSLATION WITH FEW INACCURACIESThe translation reflects almost all the original passage with relatively few significant errors of vocabulary, syntax, spelling or punctuation. The translation is readable (generally clear, smooth and cohesive).3 6-5 PASSABLE TRANSLATION WITH SOME INACCURACIESThe translation adequately reflects most of the original passage with occasional errors of vocabulary, syntax, spelling or punctuation. The translation is, for the most part, readable.2 4-3 INADEQUATE TRANSLATION WITH FREQUENT INACCURACIESThe translation only reflects about half of the original passage with frequent errors of vocabulary, syntax, spelling or punctuation. The translation is, in some parts, unreadable.1 2-1 POOR TRANSLATIONThe translation reflects less than half of the original passage. Almost all sentences contain errors of vocabulary, syntax, spelling or punctuation. The translation is , for the most part, unreadable.。

TEM-8 Composition Marking SchemeBand 5 Score 20-18Description: Effective Communication with AccuracyThe writing effectively addresses the writing task. It demonstrates a well developed logical organizational structure with clearly stated main ideas and sufficient supporting details. It has almost no errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, and it displays an adequate ability to use the language with appropriacy. No difficulty is experienced by the reader.Band 4 Score 17-15Description: Good Communication with Few InaccuraciesThe writing adequately addresses almost all of the writing task, though it deals with some parts more effectively than others. It demonstrates a generally well developed logical organizational structure with main ideas and sufficient supporting details. It has relatively few significant errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, and it displays an ability to use the language with appropriacy. Very little difficulty is experienced by the reader.Band 3 Score 14-12Description:Passable Communication with Some InaccuraciesThe writing adequately addresses most of the writing task. On the whole, it demonstrates an adequately developed logical organizational structure, though there may occasionally be a lack of relevance, clarity, consistency or support. It has occasional errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, which may, from time to time, obscure meaning, and for most parts it displays some ability to use the language with appropriacy. Occasional difficulty is experienced by the reader.Band 2 Score 11-9Description: Problematic Communication with Frequent InaccuraciesThe writing only addresses some of the writing task. It demonstrates an inadequate organizational structure, and there may quite often be a lack of relevance, clarity, consistency or support. It has frequent errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, and it displays a limited ability to use the language with appropriacy. Some difficulty is experienced by the reader.Band 1 Score 8-6Description: Almost No CommunicationThe writing almost completely fails to address the writing task. It has neither an organizational structure nor coherence. Almost all sentences contain errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, and it displays no ability to use the language with appropriacy. Even after considerable effort on the part of the reader, the text is largely incomprehensible.。

英语专八作文字数英语专业八级考试TEM8是中国英语专业学生的一项重要考试它不仅考察学生的英语听力阅读翻译等能力还包括写作能力。

在英语专八考试中作文部分通常要求学生在规定时间内完成一篇不少于400字的英语文章。

作文字数要求英语专八考试的作文部分通常要求学生写一篇不少于400字的文章。

这个字数要求是为了保证学生有足够的空间来表达自己的观点同时能够展示自己的语言组织能力和逻辑推理能力。

评分标准1. 内容完整性文章需要围绕给定的主题展开确保观点明确论据充分。

2. 语言准确性使用正确的语法结构和词汇避免拼写和语法错误。

3. 逻辑连贯性文章结构清晰段落之间逻辑关系紧密使读者容易理解。

4. 表达丰富性使用多样的句型和词汇避免重复和单调。

5. 创新性鼓励学生提出新颖的观点或使用独特的表达方式。

写作技巧1. 审题仔细阅读作文题目确保理解题目要求避免偏题。

2. 构思在动笔前花几分钟时间构思文章的结构和主要观点。

3. 草稿如果时间允许可以先写一个简短的草稿以确保文章的流畅性和连贯性。

4. 写作注意时间管理确保有足够的时间完成文章。

5. 检查在完成作文后留出几分钟时间检查语法错误和拼写错误。

练习方法1. 阅读范文通过阅读优秀的英语作文范文学习其结构和表达方式。

2. 定期练习定期进行写作练习提高写作速度和质量。

3. 参加模拟考试参加模拟考试可以帮助学生适应考试环境和时间限制。

4. 获取反馈向老师或同学寻求反馈了解自己的写作水平和需要改进的地方。

总之英语专八作文部分要求学生在规定字数内完成一篇高质量的文章这不仅考察学生的语言表达能力也考察其思维和逻辑能力。

通过不断练习和学习学生可以提高自己的写作水平更好地应对考试。

英语专八考试作文评分标准 为了帮助广大考生更好的评估自己的专八英语考试作文的成绩，今天小编特地给大家带来英语专八考试作文评分标准，下面就一起来看看吧! 英语专八作文满分20分，分为五个等级，20-18分，17-15分，14-12分，11-9分和8-6分。

BAND-8 SCORE DESCRIPTION 20-18 EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION WITH ACCURACIES The writing effectively addresses the writing task. It demonstrates a well developed logical organizational structure with clearly stated main ideas and sufficeient supporting details. It has almost no errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, and it displays an adequate ability to use the language with appropriacy. No difficulty is experienced by the reader. 17-15 GOOD COMMUNICATION WITH FEW INACCURACIES The writing adequately addresses almost all of the writing task, though it deals with some parts more effectively than others. It demonstrates a generally well developed logical organizational structure with main ideas and supporting details. It has relatively few significant errors of vocabulary, spelling, punctuation or syntax, and it displays an ability to use the language with appropriacy. Very little difficulty is experienced by the reader. 14-12 PASSABLE COMMUNICATION WITH SOME INACCURACIES The writing adequately addresses most of the writing task. On the whole, it demonstrates an adequately developed organizational structure, though there may occasionally be a lack of relevance, clarity, consistency or。

英语专八作文评分标准
评价一篇专八作文的得分，大致能够参照以下四个标准来确定：内容(content)、组织(organization)、语法(grammar)和得体性(appropriacy)。

这四个标准中，前两个标准是关于内容结构的，属于
谋篇布局部分，后两个是关于语言的，属于表达部分。

在英语专八考试的作文评阅中，一般将作文分为五个等级：
第五级：优秀作文(effective communication with accuracies)这样的作丈观点清楚，结构合理，内容充实，语言使用得体，基本没
有语言错误。

得分在18-20分。

第四级：良好作文(good communication with few inaccuracies)这样的作文观点明确，结构合理，内容充实，语言使用
较得体，稍有语言错误。

得分在15-17分。

第三级：尚可作文(passable communication with some inaccuracies)这样的作文观点明确，结构完整，内容尚可，语言使用
的得体性一般，语言错误很多，影响到作文的理解。

得分在14-12分。

第二级：问题作文(problematic communication with frequent inaccuracies)这样的作文观点不甚明确，结构不完整，内容匮乏，语
言得体性较差，语言错误较多，影响到作文的理解。

得分在11-9分。

第一级：失败作文(almost no communication)这样的作文基本
没有达到写作要求，几乎无结构和内容可言，通篇充斥语言错误，无
语言得体性可言，作文难以理解。

得分在8-6分或以下。

英语专四专八作文评分标准英文回答：The assessment criteria for CET-4 and CET-8 essays are as follows:Content (50%)。

Relevance to the topic.Depth of analysis.Originality and innovation.Structure (20%)。

Logical organization.Clear and coherent paragraphs.Transitions between paragraphs.Language (20%)。

Accuracy and grammar.Vocabulary and collocations.Fluency and coherence.Style (10%)。

Appropriate tone and register.Effective use of rhetorical devices.Specific Scoring Guidelines:Content.Outstanding (4.5-5.0): Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic and provides original andinsightful analysis.Very Good (4.0-4.4): Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and provides thoughtful analysis.Good (3.5-3.9): Demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic and provides some analysis.Fair (3.0-3.4): Demonstrates a limited understanding of the topic and provides superficial analysis.Poor (below 3.0): Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic and provides no meaningful analysis.Structure.Outstanding (4.5-5.0): Exceptionally well-organized with clear and coherent paragraphs and smooth transitions.Very Good (4.0-4.4): Well-organized with clear and coherent paragraphs and generally smooth transitions.Good (3.5-3.9): Organized logically with generallyclear and coherent paragraphs.Fair (3.0-3.4): Somewhat organized but with occasional incoherence or illogical transitions.Poor (below 3.0): Poorly organized with unclear paragraphs and frequent incoherence or illogicaltransitions.Language.Outstanding (4.5-5.0): No significant grammaticalerrors and a wide range of accurate and advanced vocabulary.Very Good (4.0-4.4): Minor grammatical errors and a good range of accurate vocabulary.Good (3.5-3.9): Occasional grammatical errors and a limited range of accurate vocabulary.Fair (3.0-3.4): Frequent grammatical errors and alimited range of vocabulary.Poor (below 3.0): Numerous grammatical errors and a severely limited range of vocabulary.Style.Outstanding (4.5-5.0): Excellent use of rhetorical devices and a sophisticated style.Very Good (4.0-4.4): Good use of rhetorical devices and a clear style.Good (3.5-3.9): Some use of rhetorical devices and a generally clear style.Fair (3.0-3.4): Limited use of rhetorical devices and a somewhat unclear style.Poor (below 3.0): No use of rhetorical devices and a significantly unclear style.中文回答：四六级写作评分标准。