2018年高考英语人教版必修五: Unit1 Great Scientists
- 格式:doc
- 大小:70.78 KB
- 文档页数:9
人教版高中英语必修5《Unit1Greatscientists》教案人教版高中英语必修5《Unit 1 Great scientists》教案【一】教学准备教学目标1.Students learn some new words and expressions to describe people ,especially famous persons;2.Students are encouraged to give more information about famous persons who they are familiar:3. Students can realize that it is scientific spirit that makes those scientists successful.教学重难点1. Words and expressions in this unit2. Previous knowledge of some of the famous scientists3. Comprehending the text教学过程【导入】Words learning(Students are assigned to learn the new words of this unit and find out the English explainations of the new words ) Definitions or explanationsA.examine 1.general principles of an art or scienceB.repeat 2.say or do againC.theory 3.at once; without delayD.immediate 4.look at...carefully in order to learn about or from...plete 5.of great value, worth or useF.valuable 6.having all its parts; whole; finishedG.announce 7.make knownH.control e or bring to an endI.positive 9.power to order or directJ.conclude 10.quite certain or sure【讲授】useful sentences learning(The sentences are picked from the text.)1.“All roads lead to Rome, ”he encouraged me after I failed the entrance examination.2.This sentence doesn’t make any sense.3.Our English teacher is not only strict with us but also friendly to us.4.He is good-looking, apart from his nose.5.It is announced that the spacecraft, Shenzhou Ⅵ, landed on the earth successfully.6.It is not Tom but you who are to blame.7.In 1995, the Chinese government put forward a plan for“rejuvenating the nation by relying on science and education”.And it has helped Chinese scientists make many breakthroughs.8.Have you drawn any conclusion after you read this passage?9.Well done.So much for the learning of the new words and expressions.【讲授】Introduction of a classic articleTeacher introduce a famous person --Qian Xuesen and students learn to write an article about the famous scientis using the words and expressions they just learn in class.【活动】Share the outcomeStudents share their article orally and discuss whether they have used some good and advanced expressions.【练习】Consolidation完成句子(1)爱因斯坦被认为是二十世纪最伟大的科学家之一。
Unit 1Great scientists一、单词——在语境中默写,在联想中积累⇩积得多(平时多积累,考场出华章)二、短语——在应用中记牢,在归纳中记多⇩积 得 多(平时多积累,考场出华章)三、句式——At the conference,the manager of the company put forward several suggestions on how to gain success in the competitive world. He said it was being fully devoted to one's work that contributed to one's success,which I think makes sense in our daily life. To conclude,we are supposed to spare no effort to realize our dream.A large population and too many private cars contribute to heavy traffic jam in the city.大量的人口和过多的私家车导致城市严重的交通阻塞。
②If you want to contribute_to our newspaper, please send me your article before the deadline.(2015·全国卷Ⅰ满分作文)如果你想往我们报纸投稿,请在最后期限前把文章寄给我。
③Participating in the contest will be a golden chance for me to show my dancing skills andmake some contributions_(contribute) to the class.(上海高考写作)参加比赛对我来说是一次难得的展示我的舞蹈才能的好机会,并对班级做出贡献。
JOHN SNOW DEFEAT S "KING CHOLER A"John Snow was a famous doctor in London— so expert, indeed, that he attend ed QueenVictor ia as her person al physic ian. But he became inspir ed when he though t abouthelpin g ordina ry people expose d to choler a. "This was the deadly diseas e of its day. Neithe r its causenor its cure was unders tood. So many thousa nds of terrif ied people died everytime therewas an outbre ak. John Snow wanted to face thechalle nge and solvethis proble m. He knew that choler a wouldneverbe contro lleduntilits causewas found.He became intere stedin two theori es that possib ly explai ned how choler a killed people. The firstsugges ted that choler a multip liedin the air. A cloudof danger ous gas floate d around untilit foundits victim s. The second sugges ted that people absorb ed this diseas e into theirbodies with theirmeals. From the stomac h the diseas e quickl y attack ed the body and soon the affect ed person died.John Snow suspec ted that the second theory was correc t but he needed eviden ce. So when anothe r outbre ak hit London in 1854, John Snow was readyto beginhis enquir y. As the diseas e spread quickl y throug h poor neighb ourho ods, he beganto gather inform ation. In two partic ularstreet s, the choler a outbre ak was so severe that more than 500 people died in 10 days. He was determ inedto find out why.Firsthe marked on a map the exactplaces whereall the dead people had lived. This gave him a valuab le clue aboutthe causeof the diseas e. Many of the deaths were near the waterpump in BroadStreet (especi allynumber s 16, 37, 38 and 40). He also notice d that some houses (such as 20 and 21 BroadStreet and 8 and 9Cambri dge Street) had had no deaths. He had not forese en this, so he made furthe r invest igati ons. He discov eredthat thesepeople worked in the pub at 7 Cambri dge Street. They had been givenfree beer and so had not drunkthe waterfrom the pump. It seemed that the waterwas to blame.Next, John Snow looked into the source of the waterfor thesetwo street s. He foundthat it came from the riverpollut ed by the dirtywaterfrom London. He immedi ately told the astoni shedpeople in BroadStreet to remove the handle from the waterpump so that it couldnot be used. Soon afterw ardsthe diseas e slowed down. He had shownthe choler a was spread by germsand not in a cloudof gas.In anothe r part of London, he foundsuppor tingeviden ce from two otherdeaths that were linked to the BroadStreet outbre ak. A woman, who had movedaway from BroadStreet, likedthe waterfrom the pump so much that she had it delive red to her houseeveryday. Both she and her daught er died of choler a afterdrinki ng the water. With this extraeviden ce John Snow was able to announ ce with certai nty that pollut ed watercarrie d the virus.T o preven t this from happen ing again, John Snow sugges ted that the source of all the watersuppli es be examin ed. The watercompan ies were instru ctednot to expose people to pollut ed waterany more. Finall y "King Choler a" was defeat ed.unit 1约翰·斯洛击败“霍乱王”约翰·斯洛是伦敦一位著名的医生——他的确医术精湛,因而成为照料维多利亚女王的私人医生。
英语必修⑤-u n i t1-G r e a t-s c i e n t i s t的课文及翻译-CAL-FENGHAI.-(YICAI)-Company One1JOHN SNOW DEFEATS "KING CHOLERA"John Snow was a famous doctor in London — so expert, indeed, that he attended Queen Victoria as her personal physician. But he became inspired when he thought about helping ordinary people exposed to cholera. "This was the deadly disease of its day. Neither its cause nor its cure was understood. So many thousands of terrified people died every time there was an outbreak. John Snow wanted to face the challenge and solve this problem. He knew that cholera would never be controlled until its cause was found.He became interested in two theories that possibly explained how cholera killed people. The first suggested that cholera multiplied in the air. A cloud of dangerous gas floated around until it found its victims. The second suggested that people absorbed this disease into their bodies with their meals. From the stomach the disease quickly attacked the body and soon the affected person died.John Snow suspected that the second theory was correct but he needed evidence. So when another outbreak hit London in 1854, John Snow was ready to begin his enquiry. As the disease spread quickly through poor neighbourhoods, he began to gather information. In two particular streets, the cholera outbreak was so severe that more than 500 people died in 10 days. He was determined to find out why.First he marked on a map the exact places where all the dead people had lived. This gave him a valuable clue about the cause of the disease. Many of the deaths were near the water pump in Broad Street (especially numbers 16, 37, 38 and 40). He also noticed that some houses (such as 20 and 21 Broad Street and 8 and 9 Cambridge Street) had had no deaths. He had not foreseen this, so he made further investigations. He discovered that these people worked in the pub at 7 Cambridge Street. They had been given free beer and so had not drunk the water from the pump. It seemed that the water was to blame.Next, John Snow looked into the source of the water for these two streets. He found that it came from the river polluted by the dirty water from London. He immediately told the astonished people in Broad Street to remove the handle from the water pump so that it could not be used. Soon afterwards the disease slowed down. He had shown the cholera was spread by germs and not in a cloud of gas.In another part of London, he found supporting evidence from two other deaths that were linked to the Broad Street outbreak. A woman, who had moved away from Broad Street, liked the water from the pump so much that she had it delivered to her house every day. Both she and her daughter died of cholera after drinking the water. With this extra evidence John Snow was able to announce with certainty that polluted water carried the virus.To prevent this from happening again, John Snow suggested that the source of all the water supplies be examined. The water companies were instructed not to expose people to polluted water any more. Finally "King Cholera" was defeated.unit 1约翰·斯洛击败“霍乱王”约翰·斯洛是伦敦一位著名的医生——他的确医术精湛,因而成为照料维多利亚女王的私人医生。
2018年高考英语人教版必修五:模块5 Unit 1 Great Scientists Ⅰ.单项选择1.【2017·北京卷】32. Jim has retired, but he still remember the happy time _______ with his students.A. to spendB. spendC. spendingD. spent【答案】D【解析】句意:Jim已经退休了,但是他依然记得和学生一起度过的快乐时光。
句子已经有了谓语,空格只能填非谓语动词,逻辑主语是time,和spend 之间是被动关系,故用过去分词spent。
考点:考查非谓语动词。
2.【2016·江苏】28.In art criticism, you must assume the artist has a secret message________within the work.A. to hideB. hiddenC. hidingD. being hidden【答案】B3.【2016·浙江】10.To return to the problem of water pollution, I'd like you to look at a study _______ in Australia in 2012.A. having conductedB. to be conductedC. conductingD. conducted【答案】D【解析】句意:为了回到水污染的问题,我想要你研究一下2012年澳大利亚进行的研究。
使用非谓语动词作定语,study和conduct是动宾关系,用过去分词作定语。
B项也表示被动,但是不定式的被动,表示将要发生的事情。
故选D。
Ⅱ.阅读理解A【2017·衡阳高三一模】There has been a controversy between animal rights supporters and scientists about whether it is right to use animals to find cures for human diseases in experimental research. Personally, if there are no other alternatives, and if it is possible that this will contribute to science, animals may be used for experimental research.The animal rights supporters label scientists as “cruel” for causing animals to die in medical experiments, while they do not oppose the people, mostly farmers, who kill animals for food. Some even claim that people and animals are equal and they should be treated equally. But can the death of an animal be the same thing as the death of a person? I think causing animals to die for science or for saving human lives may be considered ethical (伦理的), if it will contribute to the advancement of science and human health in general.Another basic argument of animal rights supporters is that people and animals are different genetically. They claim that it will make no good to use animals in experiments because they are too different to be compared to people. Some of them even state that it is better to use people directly as they think that the results of experiments on animals cannot be valid and reliable as long as the same observation has not been done on man. However, these people cannot foresee the disastrous results of such a practice. Many people are likely to die until a healthy result is obtained. People and animals may not be the same, but to some degree, scientists are right to use animal models to do some experiments that could not be achieved in human. There are also a lot of examples which show that using animals resulted in significant developments and helped to cure some serious illnesses.All in all, using animals for medical research is ethical as long as it contributes to scientific development and human health. And this practice is only acceptableon the condition that animals are treated humanely.语篇解读:本文是一篇议论文,主要论述了动物权利支持者和科学家之间关于用动物进行医学试验研究以寻找治疗人类疾病的方法是否正确的争议。
作者认为动物可以被用于医学研究并针对此论点进行了分析论证。
1.Animal rights supporters hold the opinion that ________.A.farmers have the legal rights to kill animalsB.causing animals to die for science is acceptableC.scientists are to blame for killing animals for researchD.animals and people are not different genetically【答案】C【解析】细节理解题。
根据第二段第一句可知,动物权利支持者认为科学家应对科学研究致使动物死亡负责。
故选C。
2.We can infer that the author ________.A.seems to be an animal rights supporterB.does experimental research on animalsC.is concerned about the future of animalsD.agrees that animals can be used in medical research【答案】D【解析】推理判断题。
根据第一段最后一句及最后一段内容可推知,作者同意用动物进行医学研究。
故选D。
3.According to the text, it is a fact that ________.A.it is always illegal to use animals for experimental researchB.using animals for medical experiments contributes to curing some serious illnesses C.using people models is against the law and regarded as cruelD.it makes no difference whether to use animals or people for experimental research 【答案】B【解析】细节理解题。
根据第三段最后一句可知,B项所述是事实。
故选B。
BPeople have been wondering why elephants do not develop cancer even though they have lifespans (寿命) that are similar to humans, living for around 50 to 70 years.Now scientists believe they know why. A team at the University of Chicago, US has found that elephants carry a large number of genes that stop tumors (肿瘤) developing. To be precise, they found 20 copies of an antitumor gene called TP53 in elephants. Most other species, including humans, only carry one copy.According to the research, the extra copies of the gene improved the animal's sensitivity to DNA damage, which lets the cells quickly kill themselves when damaged before they can go on to form deadly tumors.“An increased risk of de veloping cancer has stood in the way of the evolution of large body sizes in many animals,” the study author Dr. Vincent Lynch told The Guardian. If every living cell has the same chance of becoming cancerous (癌变的), large creatures with a long lifespan like whales and elephants should have a greater risk of developing cancer than humans and mice. But across species, the risk of cancer does not show a connection with body mass.This phenomenon was found by Oxford University scientist Richard Peto in the 1970s and later named “Peto's paradox (悖论)”. Biologists believe it results from larger animals using protection that many smaller animals do not. In the elephant's case, the making of TP53 is nature's way of keeping this species alive.The study also found that when the same genes were brought to life in mice, they had the same cancer resistance as elephants. This means researchers could use the discovery to develop new treatments that can help stop cancer spreading or even developing in the first place.“Natu re has already figured out how to prevent cancer,” said Joshua Schiffman, a biologist at the School of Medicine, University of Utah, US. “It's up to us to learn how different animals deal with the problem so that we can use those strategies to prevent canc er in people.”语篇解读:科学家研究发现,大象不患癌症是因为它们的体内有很多阻止肿瘤生长的基因TP53,人类有望通过研究TP53来预防癌症。