ABSTRACT
The focus of this article is to analyze the relevant provisions of the revised civil procedure law,with the aim of finding the deficiencies in the legislation of the protection of behavior.The analysis of the legal norms can not be separated from the jurisprudence.Therefore,this article begins with the development and evolution of the behavior preservation,briefly introduces the causes of the middle injunction in the Anglo American law system and the false sanction of the continental law system,the function and the structure of the procedure. These experiences play an important role in perfecting our behavior preservation system,and lay a foundation for the perfection of the latter part of this article.The nature of behavior preservation determines the direction of the construction and perfection of our country's behavior preservation system,and determines what role the behavior preservation of our country should play,such as the application of the system of preservation of behavior.Therefore,this paper analyses the related theories of the behavior preservation and the characteristics of the system of behavior preservation.The behavior preservation system is qualitatively analyzed,including:behavior preservation is a special litigation procedure,independent of litigation procedure,and a temporary relief procedure.In particular,the behavior preservation procedure is independent of the nature of the proceedings,which determines the difference between the procedures of the initiation,jurisdiction,trial,execution and relief of the preservation of the act and the proceedings of the case.
This article is divided into five chapters.The first chapter"Introduction" mainly deals with the basis of the thesis selection;the second chapter"the evolution of behavior preservation":the development and evolution process of China's civil action preservation system is mainly introduced;the third chapter: "the theoretical basis of behavior preservation":the analysis of the nature and characteristics of behavior preservation and the protection of behavior.The qualitative of the degree,the behavior preservation as a special procedure, independent of the litigation procedure,is a temporary relief system;the fourth chapter,"the present situation and the deficiency of our country's behavior preservation",mainly introduces the legislative provisions of our country's
behavior preservation system,as well as the shortcomings in the legislation, and the starting and applying conditions around the behavior preservation.The provisions of jurisdiction,trial,guarantee,execution,relief and so on,and in the fifth chapter,put forward the perfect conception for the insufficiency.The fourth chapter and the fifth chapter are the important parts of this article,and also the foothold of this article.
Key words:behavior preservation,preservation,qualitative legislation,lack of system improvement.
目录
第1章引言 (1)
第2章行为保全发展演变 (2)
2.1行为保全产生及其发展 (2)
2.1.1英美法系的中间禁令 (2)
2.1.2大陆法系的假处分 (3)
2.2我国行为保全制度发展 (4)
第3章行为保全制度理论基础 (6)
3.1行为保全程序的定性 (6)
3.1.1行为保全是属于特别程序 (7)
3.1.2行为保全是临时救济程序 (10)
3.1.3行为保全程序独立于诉讼程序 (11)
3.2行为保全和先予执行的关系 (12)
第4章我国民事行为保全之现状及其不足 (15)
4.1我国行为保全制度现状 (15)
4.1.1知识产权禁令制度 (15)
4.1.2《海事诉讼特别程序法》海事强制令制度 (15)
4.1.3《民事诉讼法》及其司法解释中的规定 (16)
4.2我国民事行为保全制度存在的不足 (17)
4.2.1行为保全适用条件模糊 (17)
4.2.2法院依职权启动行为保全程序存在较大争议 (18)
4.2.3行为保全管辖与本案管辖未分开设置 (19)
4.2.4单一的“申请－审查”式的程序构造不利公平 (20)
4.2.5行为保全的担保制度不够完善 (21)
4.2.6未区分行为保全执行机关与本案执行机关 (23)
4.2.7行为保全救济途径不全面 (24)
第5章我国民事行为保全制度完善设想 (25)
5.1行为保全启动程序启动应当确有必要性 (25)
5.2行为保全的启动应摒弃法院依职权启动 (25)
5.3民事行为保全的管辖应独立于诉讼管辖 (26)
5.4保全案件原则上应当开庭审理 (27)
5.5完善行为保全的担保制度 (28)
5.5.1担保功能定位为错误行为保全责任 (28)
5.5.2申请人申请行为保全均需提供担保 (29)
5.5.3多样化的担保方式 (29)
5.5.4担保的数额与错误行为保全造成损失相当 (30)
5.6丰富保全裁定的强制执行措施 (30)
5.6.1特殊情况下采取替代履行 (30)
5.6.2行为保全机关和执行机关分立 (30)
5.7增加行为保全救济途径 (31)
5.7.1行为保全撤销 (31)
5.7.2行为保全复议 (31)
第6章总结 (33)
致谢 (34)
参考文献 (35)