ANNEX I
WIPO Questionnaire on Security Interests in Intellectual Property Background
Intellectual property (IP) financing is an area of increased interest and importance globally. As intangible assets have increased in value, so IP rights represent substantial assets for companies of all sizes in developing and developed economies. As described in this Information Paper, such IP assets are increasingly being used as collateral for the purpose of raising debt finance, or credit. However, the ability of IP owners to use their IP effectively to gain access to low cost credit requires the support of national law, and increased awareness of IP financing among governments, the IP community and financial institutions.
In 2003, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) was requested by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) to cooperate in its work on the development of a Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions and, in particular, to provide expertise in the field of secured financing and IP law. The purpose of the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide is to assist States to develop modern secured transactions laws, so as to promote the availability of secured credit. The UNCITRAL Legislative Guide was concluded in 2007, and UNCITRAL Working Group VI is drafting a supplement to the Guide dealing with secured transactions involving IP, expected to be completed in 2010.
There is an increasing need for information on this issue, as the practice of securitization of IP is taken up by a variety of enterprises in various jurisdictions. Securitization of IP assets can be an important tool for economic development, and numerous governments are considering the modernization of their secured transactions laws to facilitate the practice.
Questionnaire
At the request of, and in consultation with, its Member States, the WIPO Secretariat conducted a questionnaire designed to gather information on the manner in which security interests in IP are dealt with in national copyright, patent and trademark laws. For this purpose, “IP laws” include d legislative enactments, administrative regulations, or judicial decrees that generally constitute the body of IP law in each country (including at the federal and provincial level) or region. The questionnaire was designed to collect data, and provide Member States with access to information about degree to which secured transactions are provided for in IP law in various countries and regions of the world, and thereby to assist them to evaluate the IP issues being raised in this field in various fora.
The Secretariat distributed the questionnaires to the WIPO Member States in December 2008, and comments were received from 66 Member States and regional organizations. The responses were greatly varied, with some States giving detailed provisions of relevant legislation, with other States providing narrative descriptions of the national context and legal situation for IP financing, and further States responding that their applicable legislation did not address the issues covered by the questionnaire.
Responses to the questionnaire were provided by the following Member States and regional organizations: Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Bolivia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ethiopia, Eurasian Patent Organization, European Patent Office, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Korea, Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lichtenstein, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Republic of Slovenia, Romania, The Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Seychelles, Slovak Republic, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, The Netherlands, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uzbekistan, Zambia.
The eight questions making up the questionnaire were addressed to patents, trademarks, industrial designs and copyright, as follows:
Question 1
Are security interests in IP, or any issue related to security interests in IP, addressed in any of your country’s IP laws?
Question 2
If issues relating to security interests are addressed in your country’s laws, for the
following types of IP, please indicate whether such issues are addressed in a) only IP laws, b) both, IP laws and other laws, c) only other laws, d) no law
Question 3
If issues relating to security interests are addressed in your country’s laws, please
indicate which law addresses the following issues:
(i)The creation or granting of security interest in IP;
(ii)The method(s) for making a security interest in IP effective against third parties (including infringers) or for giving notice to third parties;
(iii)The priority to be given to a security interest in IP with respect to other assignments, licenses, or security interests;
(iv)The enforcement of a security interest in IP.
Question 4
Can security interests in IP be recorded on a register in your country, whether an IP-
specific register or other register?
Question 5
In your country or region does a security interest in IP become effective against third parties upon its creation, or is it necessary to record the security interest in any register or in an IP-specific register for it to become effective against third parties? Question 6
In your country or region if a security interest can be recorded in an IP-specific
register, what effect does such recording have on its priority against later competing
assignments, licences and security interests? Does such a recording give priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge, or only over those without
knowledge of the security interest, or merely create a presumption of priority or have another or no effect?
Question 7
Under the applicable law in your country or region does a security right in IP include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP, such as license fees, equitable
remuneration, royalties or other compensation?
Question 8
In the case that IP subject to security interest is infringed by a third party, how does
the applicable law in your country or region address the following matters:
(i)Does the applicable law allow the secured creditor to take legal action to
preserve the value of its security, either alone or in conjunction with the
owner of the IP?
(ii)If the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action, can the secured creditor collect damages, obtain an injunction, or both?
(iii)If the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action against third parties, do the debtor and secured creditor have autonomy to
determine the right to do so in the security agreement, or is it determined
solely by the IP law, or is the issue unaddressed in your law?
Summary of results
This Annex I contains, below, a summary giving a general picture of responses to each question, then in Part I, a compilation of responses to each question in the questionnaire, and in Part II, a short description of the response provided by each Member State. It should be noted that the statistics below do not amount to a total of 100% in each case, because some States provided more than one answer per question and others omitted some answers.
In summary:
With respect to Question 1 (Are security interests in IP, or any issue related to security interests in IP, addressed in any of your country’s IP laws?), some 61% of responding Member States stated that their national and/or regional provisions did address security interests in IP, whereas some 36% of responding Member States stated that their IP laws contained no provisions addressing security interests in IP.
With respect to Question 2 (If issues relating to security interests are addressed in your country’s laws, for the following types of IP, please indicate whether such issues are addressed in a) only IP laws, b) both IP laws and other laws, c) only other laws, d) no law), a minority of 12% of responding Member States’ laws addressed security interests in IP by relying on IP law provisions only, while some 49% use a mixture of IP law and other laws. A significant proportion of responding Member States, some 43%, stated that other sources of law than IP law covered the issue (and for 30% of these countries, this was only for copyright-related transactions). Finally, 22% of responding Member States did not have any law addressing the issue.
With respect to Question 3 (If issues relating to security interests are addressed in your country’s laws, please i ndicate which law addresses the following issues: (i) the creation or granting of security interest in IP; (ii) the method(s) for making a security interest in IP effective against third parties (including infringers) or for giving notice to third parties; (iii) the priority to be given to a security interest in IP with respect to other assignments, licenses, or security interests; (iv) the enforcement of a security interest in IP), the responses indicated that in most cases, the issues were addressed by laws other than IP laws. First, with regard to the creation or granting of security interest in IP, some 65% of responding Member States relied on laws other than IP. Second, with regard to the method for making a security interest effective against third parties, some 50% of responding Member States relied on laws other than IP. Third, with respect to the priority to be given to security interests in IP, some 40% of responding Member States relied on laws other than IP and, fourth, with respect to enforcement of a security interest in IP, 64% of responding Member States followed the trend.
With respect to Question 4 (Can security interests in IP be recorded on a register in your country, whether an IP-specific register or other register?), it appears that security interest in IP can be recorded in an IP specific register in the majority of countries, as indicated by some 67% of responding Member States, while 31% of them allocated other types of register and some 14% maintain no register.
With respect to Question 5 (In your country or region does a security interest in IP become effective against third parties upon its creation, or is it necessary to record the security interest in any register or in an IP-specific register for it to become effective against third parties?), the results were very diverse. Some 40% of responding Member States stated that a record had to be made in an IP-specific register for the security interest to be effective against third parties, while 29% of Member States declared that the security interest became effective against third parties upon its creation, and in some 18% of Member States, a security interest in IP became effective against third parties once recorded in other types of register.
With respect to Question 6 (In your country or region if a security interest can be recorded in an IP-specific register, what effect does such recording have on its priority against later competing assignments, licences and security interests? Does such a recording give priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge, or only over those without knowledge of the security interest, or merely create a presumption of priority or have another or no effect?), the questionnaire revealed that in some 37% of responding Member States in which a security interest could be recorded on an IP-specific register, such recordation gives priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge, as opposed to some 26% of responding Member States in which recordation had no such effect. In about 11% of responding Member States a presumption of priority was established, while in 5% of Member States, priority was only accorded to competing parties without knowledge of the security interest in IP.
With respect to Question 7 (Under the applicable law in your country or region does a security right in IP include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP, such as license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties or other compensation?), the questionnaire again revealed divergences among responding Member States, with some 41% of Member States responding that a security right in IP does include all the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP, whereas such proceeds are not included in the security right in IP in some 34% of Member States.
Finally, with respect to Question 8 (In the case that IP subject to security interest is infringed by a third party, how does the applicable law in your country or region address the following matters: (i)Does the applicable law allow the secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security, either alone or in conjunction with the owner of the IP?; (ii) If the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action, can the secured creditor collect damages, obtain an injunction, or both?; (iii) If the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action against third parties, do the debtor and secured creditor have autonomy to determine the right to do so in the security agreement, or is it determined solely by the IP law, or is the issue unaddressed in your law?), the results of the questionnaire revealed that the laws of some 31% of responding Member States allowed the secured creditor to take action alone to preserve the value of the security, while 20% of Member States’ laws allowed the secured creditor to take such legal action only together with the owner of the IP, and some 28% of Member States’ laws allow no such action. In countries where the secured creditor is allowed to bring a legal action, some 34% of responding Member States’ laws provide that the secured creditor can claim damages, seek an injunction or obtain both, while in 3% of responding Member States the laws restrict remedies to an injunction only, and in 5% of responding Member States the laws restrict remedies to damages only. In addition, in some 32% of responding Member States, debtors and secured creditors have the autonomy to determine the right to bring legal action in their security agreement, whereas in some 6% of Member States, the applicable IP laws address the issue, and a similar proportion of other Member States, no legal provisions address the issue.
Part I Compilation of responses to the questionnaire
* Except for copyright
** Except for patents
*** Except for industrial designs
? Except for more than one of the above
WIPO/IP/FIN/GE/09/7
page 134
* No/other laws for copyright and/or patents
** No/other laws for trademarks and/or industrial designs *** Mixed laws for copyright only
*Except for copyright
** Other law for copyright only
* No register for copyright
** Other register for copyright
*** No register for more than one IP right (copyright, trademarks, patent and industrial designs)
* Except for copyright
* Except for copyright
* Available for copyright only
Part II Summary of national responses on security interests in IP
The following paragraphs summarize each of the 67 responses to the WIPO questionnaire, illustrating the variety of approaches to security interests in IP, through IP laws and otherwise.
1.In Algeria, security interests in IP are not covered by national law, but are addressed
by other laws governed by the Code of Commerce. Although no IP law directly
addresses the issue, the Code of Commerce provides for the means to make security
interests in IP effective against third parties as well as the priority order to follow with regard to other assignments, licences or security interests. The Civil Procedure Code addresses the required steps to follow regarding enforcement of a security interests in IP. The latter must be recorded in a non IP-specific register in order to be recognized and enforceable against third parties and/or all parties involved, as stipulated by
Article 120, Ordinance No.75-59 of the Civil Code. In cases of infringement, the
secured creditor can take legal action to preserve its interests either alone or with the
owner to seek relief through damages, injunction or both. However, it should be
noted that debtors and secured creditors enjoy full autonomy to determine in their
agreement whether the right to take legal action can be granted.
2.In Armenia,security interests in IP and related issues are not covered by any
provisions in the national IP law or other law.
3.In Australia,security interests in IP are covered by national IP law with the exception
of security interests involving copyright assets, which are covered by a mixture of IP
laws and other laws. Indeed, common law governs the area of security interests in
trademarks and patents by recognizing the creation or granting of security interests as well as the methods for making the security interest in IP effective against third
parties, whereas security interests in copyright are governed by national contract and
equity law. The same legislation addresses issues related to the priority to be given to security interests in IP with respect to other assignments, licences, or security interests and their enforcement. In order to be effective, security interests in IP must be
recorded in an IP-specific register, with the exception of copyright, which involves
another register. As stipulated by the various IP laws, security interests become
effective against third parties upon their creation. While the recordation of security
interests in IP in an IP-specific register creates a presumption of priority over later
competing assignments; there is no such effect with respect to trademarks. Under the
applicable law, security rights in IP do include any proceeds realized from the
exercise of the IP, such as license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties and/or other compensation. There is no relevant law allowing a secured creditor to take legal
action to preserve the value of its security; where IP subject to a security right is
infringed, the national IP law grants a right to a secured creditor to take legal action against third parties to either claim for damages, an injunction or both. The right of a secured creditor to take legal action is governed by IP law only.
4.In Austria,security interests in IP are covered by a mixture of national IP laws and
other laws. Various IP laws and other laws address issues ranging from the creation or granting of a security interest in IP, to the method for making the security interest effective against third parties. The priority to be given to security interests in IP with respect to other assignments, licences and the enforcement of a security interest are governed by national IP law, with the exception of security interests in copyright, for which other laws apply. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific
register, with the exception of copyright for which no register exists. Security
interests in IP become effective against third parties upon creation with regard to
trademarks and copyright, whereas security interests in industrial designs and patents need to be recorded in an IP-specific register. Furthermore, the effect of such
recordation is to give priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge.
Under the applicable law, security rights in IP include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties and/or other compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the
applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action alone or with the owner to seek damages, an injunction or both. However, there is no law addressing the issue whether a debtor and secured creditor would have the autonomy to determine whether
a party to the contract would have the right to take legal action or not.
5.In Bolivia,security interests in IP are not addressed by IP law or any other national
law. There is no register allowing the recordation of security interests in IP and,
under the applicable law, security rights in IP do not include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP.
6.In Bosnia & Herzegovina,security interests in IP are covered by a mixture of national
IP laws and other laws with the exception of copyright, which is not covered by law.
The Law on Obligatory Relations and Law on Industrial Property govern this area and provide for the creation or granting of a security interest in IP as well as the methods for making such interests effective against third parties, the priority to be accorded and their enforcement. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific
register, and such recordation is a pre-requisite to make it effective against third
parties. The effect of such a recordation is to give priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge. Under the applicable law, security rights in IP include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable
remuneration, royalties and/or other compensation. In the case that IP subject to a
security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action alone to seek damages, an injunction or both. However, debtors and secured creditors enjoy full autonomy to determine in the security interest agreement whether the right to take legal action can be granted.
7.In Bulgaria,security interests in IP are covered by a mixture of national IP laws and
other laws with the exception of security interests in copyright, which are not covered by law. The various IP laws and other laws address issues ranging from the creation or granting of a security interest in IP, to the method for making the security interest effective against third parties. The priority to be given to security interests in IP with respect to other assignments, licenses and enforcement are governed by other law,
with the exception for security interests in copyright for which there is no applicable
law. Security Interests in IP can be recorded in an IP register or other register, with the exception of copyright. The Law on Patents and Utility Model Registration and the Law on Marks and Geographical Indications, as well as the Law on Industrial
Designs all require the registration of the relevant IP rights on their respective register in order to become effective against third parties. The effect of such a recording gives priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law does not allow the secured creditor to take legal action in order to preserve the value of its security.
8.In Burkina Faso,security interests in IP are not covered by IP law alone, but by a
mixture of IP law and other legislation. The “Accord de Bangui du 24 Février 1999”
in addition to the “A ctes Uniformes OHADA du 17 Avril 1997” govern all issues
related to the creation of security interests in IP as well as the methods for making it effective against third parties, in addition to the priority to be accorded and its
enforcement. The effect of such recordation is to give priority over all competing
parties regardless of their knowledge. Under the applicable law, security rights in IP does include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties and/or other compensation. If IP subject to a
security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law allows a secured
creditor to take legal action with the owner of the IP to preserve the value of its
security, and to seek damages, an injunction or both in court. Also, the debtor and secured creditor have the autonomy to determine in their agreement whether there is a right to take such legal action. (Note, the response for this country did not address all questions.)
9.In Brazil,security interests in IP are covered by a mixture of national IP laws and
other laws. The Brazilian Civil Code provides for the creation or granting of a
security interest in IP as well as the methods for making it effective against third
parties, the priority to be accorded and its enforcement. Security interests in IP can be registered in an IP register, and such registration is a pre-requisite to make the
security interest effective against third parties. However, security interests in
copyright cannot be registered and are considered to take effect upon creation as
prescribed by national IP law. The effect of such recordation is to give priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge. Under the applicable law,
security rights in IP do not include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties and/or other compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security in
conjunction with the owner of IP, although the purpose of the legal action is restricted to the granting of an injunction. The debtor and secured creditor have the autonomy to determine in the security agreement which party should have the right to take legal action against third parties.
10.In Canada,security interests in IP are not covered by IP law alone, but by a mixture of
IP law and other legislation, particularly with respect to security interests in copyright.
The Canadian Personal Property Act provides for the creation or granting of a security interest, as well as the methods for making it effective against third parties, the order of priority to be given to it with respect to other assignments, licences and its
enforcement. Security interests in IP have to be recorded onto an IP-specific register in order to become effective against third parties, with the exception of security
interests in copyright, which become effective against third parties upon creation.
Such recordation gives priority over all competing parties regardless of their
knowledge. Also, under the applicable law, security interests in IP do not include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable
remuneration, royalties and/or compensation. Furthermore, if IP subject to security interest is infringed by a third party, there is no provision allowing the secured
creditor to take action in order to preserve the value of its security.
11.In Chile,security interests in IP are covered by national IP law, except for security
interests in copyright. The Chilean Civil Code and Commercial Code address the following issues: creation or granting of security interests in IP, the methods for
making such agreements effective against third parties, the priority to be given with regard to other assignments, licences and enforcement. In order to be effective
against third parties, security interests in IP must be recorded on an IP-specific
register. However, such recordation has no effect and does not give priority over all competing parties. Furthermore, security rights in IP do not include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as licenses, remuneration, royalties and/or compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law does not allow the secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security.
12.In China,security interests in IP are not covered by law, with the exception of
security interests in copyright, which are governed by a mixture of national IP laws and other laws. The Property Law and Guarantee Law of the People’s Republic of China provides for the creation or granting of security interests in IP as well as the methods for making them effective against third parties, the priority to be given with regards to other assignments, licences and enforcement. To be effective against third parties, a security interest must be recorded in an IP-specific register. The effect of such recordation gives priority over all competing parties regardless of their
knowledge. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP do not include the
proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable
remuneration, royalties and/or compensation. If a security interest in copyright is infringed by a third party, the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security; however a different principle applies to a security interests in other types of IP, such as patents, trademarks and industrial
designs. Consequently, a secured creditor may seek damages only in cases of
copyright infringement. Also, IP law determines when a debtor and secured creditor have the autonomy to determine in the agreement whether there is a right to take legal action.
13.In Colombia,security interests in IP are not covered by IP law. However, the
Colombian Commercial Code deals with issues related to security interests in IP. It provides for the creation or granting of a security interest in IP, the methods for
making it effective against third parties and the priority to be given with regard to other assignments and/or licences. Security interests in IP must be recorded in an IP-specific register as well as in another register to become effective against third parties.
The effect of such recordation is to merely create a presumption of priority. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP do not include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties and/or compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law does not allow a secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security.
14.In Cuba,security interests in IP are not covered by IP law. The Cuban Civil Code
(Article 59), provides for issues related to security interests in IP including the
creation or granting of a security interest, the methods for making it effective against third parties, and its enforcement. The above-mentioned law provides that there is no requirement to record a security interest in a register as it is considered to exist upon its creation and is effective against third parties. Under the applicable law, security rights in IP do include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as
license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties and/or compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law allows a secured
creditor to take legal action alone to preserve the value of its security, and to seek damages, an injunction or both in court. Also, the debtor and secured creditor have the autonomy to determine in their agreement whether there is a right to take such legal action.
15.In Cyprus,security interests in IP are not covered by IP law. The Cypriot Contract
Law governs this area and provides for issues related to security interests in IP such as the creation or granting of a security interest, the methods for making it effective
against third parties, and its enforcement. The applicable law provides that there is no need to record a security interest in a register as it is considered to exist upon its
creation and is effective against third parties. The recordation of a security interest in IP has no effect upon its priority against later competing assignments. Under the
applicable law, security rights in IP do not include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as licence fees, equitable remuneration, royalties and/or
compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, a
secured creditor may decide to take legal action alone or with the IP owner in order to preserve the value of its security, and may seek damages, an injunction or both, in court. In addition, the debtor and secured creditor have the autonomy to determine in their agreement whether there is a right to take legal action.
16.In the Czech Republic,security interests in IP and related issues are addressed by IP
laws, with the exception of security interests in patents and copyright, which both depend on a mixture of other laws. The Czech Civil Code, Trade Marks and Patents Acts provide for the creation or granting of security interests in all forms of IP except for copyright. They also provide for the priority to be given to a security interest in IP with respect to other assignments or licences. However, the method for making a security interest in IP effective against third parties is governed by IP laws such as the Trade Marks Act, Patents and Industrial Designs Act. The enforcement of a security interest in IP is governed by the Czech Republic Civil Code. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register, whilst security interests in copyright
become effective against a third party upon their creation. Recordation of a security interests in IP gives priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge.
Under the applicable law, security rights in IP include any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as licenses, equitable remuneration, royalties or other
compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law does not allow the secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security.
17.In Denmark,security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws. The Law on Registration (Chapter 7) provides for the creation or granting of a security interest in IP, as well as the method for making a security interest in IP effective against a third party. In addition, it provides for the
priority to be given to security interests in IP with respect to other assignments,
licences, or security interests. The Danish Administration of Justice Act provides for the enforcement of security interests. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register, with the exception of security interests over copyright that can be registered in another register in order to gain effectiveness against third parties.
However such recordation has no effect, and does not give priority over all competing parties. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP include any proceeds
realized from the exercise of the IP subject such as licenses, equitable remuneration, royalties or other compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action alone to claim for damages, an injunction or both. Also, the debtor and secured creditor enjoy the autonomy to determine in their agreement whether the right to take legal action subsists.
18.In Estonia,security interests in IP and issues related to them are covered by national
IP laws, except for security interests in copyright. These laws provide for the creation or granting of security interests in IP, the method for making them effective against third parties, the priority to given to security interests in IP with respect to other
assignments, licences, or security interests, as well as the enforcement of such
security interests. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register to become effective against third parties. In addition, such recordation gives priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as licenses, equitable remuneration, royalties or other compensation.
19. In Ethiopia,security interests in IP and related issues are not covered by any national
IP or other law.
20.Under the jurisdiction of the Eurasian Patent Organization,security interests in IP and
related issues are covered by IP laws with respect to patents only. The Patent
Regulations under the Eurasian Patent Convention provide for the creation or granting of security interests in IP and the method for making them effective against third
parties. They also provide for the priority to be given to security interests in IP with respect to other assignments, licences or security interests, in addition to their
enforcement. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register to become effective against third parties regardless of their
knowledge. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, IP law provides that a debtor or secured creditor can decide alone to take legal action in order to preserve the value of its security by seeking an injunction.
21.Under the jurisdiction of the European Patent Office,applications as an object of
property are subject to national law (Article 74 of the European Patent Convention (EPC)). As the EPC does not provide otherwise, this is also the case for European patents (Article 2(2) of the EPC). However, the EPC contains a few provisions aimed at ensuring that the applicant or other parties to the proceedings are clearly identified.
According to Article 72 of the EPC, an assignment of a European patent application shall be made in writing and shall require the signature of the parties to the contract.
Furthermore, transfers, other rights in rem and enforcement measures affecting a
European patent application are recorded in the European Patent Register (Rule 22 and 23, Implementing Regulations). To this end, the interested party is required to file
a request in writing, provide written proof of the relevant act and pay a fee. These
provisions only apply to European patent applications and to granted patents during
the opposition period or the opposition proceedings. Granted patents are entered in the national patent register and that entry entitles the proprietor to take action.
22.In France,security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws. The Intellectual Property Code addresses several issues such as the method for making security interests in IP effective against third parties as well as the priority to give the security interest in IP with respect to other assignments, licences, royalties or other compensation. The creation or granting of security interests in IP and their enforcement are dealt with by other laws. Security interest in IP can be registered in an IP-specific register to become effective against third parties regardless of their knowledge.
23.In Georgia,security interests in IP are not covered by any national IP or other law.
Security interests in IP are considered to exist upon its creation and can be recorded in an IP register. Such recordation creates a presumption of priority over other
assignments. Under the applicable law, the security interest does not include any
proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP, such as license fees, equitable
remuneration, royalties or other compensation. No provisions in national law address the issue of what should occur where a secured interest in IP has been infringed by a third party.
24.In Germany,security interests in IP and related issues are addressed by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws, except for security interests with respect to patents and copyright. National IP laws govern issues related to the creation or granting of security interests in IP, and the method for making them effective against third parties, whereas the Code of Civil Procedure addresses issues related to the priority to be
given to security interests in IP with respect to other assignments, licences, or security interests as well as the enforcement of a security interest in IP. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register. Upon creation, a security interest in IP
becomes effective against third parties regardless of their knowledge, except for
security interests with respect to copyright, where no specific register exists. Such a recordation gives a presumption of priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge. However, under the applicable law, security interests in IP do not include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP, such as license fees,
equitable remuneration, royalties or other compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law stipulates that the parties enjoy the autonomy in their agreement to determine the right to take legal action.
25.In Greece,security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws, except for security interests in patents and industrial designs. A Presidential Decree (PD ,456/84 and 503/85), coupled with national IP laws, cover issues such as the creation or granting of security interests in IP, the
method for making them effective against third parties, the priority to be given to
them with respect to other assignments, licenses, or security interests, as well as their enforcement. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register to
become effective against third parties, except for security interests with respect to
copyright, for which no register exists. Such a recordation gives priority over all
competing parties regardless of their knowledge. A security right in IP includes the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP, such as license fees, equitable
remuneration, royalties or other compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law allows the secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security, either alone or in conjunction with the IP
owner in order to collect damages, seek an injunction or both. The applicable law also stipulates that the parties enjoy the autonomy in their agreement to determine the right to take legal action.
26.In Ireland,security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws. The creation or granting of security interests in IP, the method for making them effective against third parties, the priority to be given to them with respect to other assignments, licenses or security interests, and their
enforcement are all covered by national IP law, with an exception of security interests with respect to copyright, which are addressed by other laws. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register, except for
security interests in copyright, for which no register exists. (Note, the response for this country did not address all questions.)
27.In Israel,security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws. Mortgage Law, Company Law and national IP laws are the principle pieces of legislation with provisions addressing issues such as the creation or granting of security interests in IP, the method for making them effective against third parties, as well as the priority to be given to them with respect to other assignments, licences or security interest, and their enforcement. Security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register, except that security interests with respect to copyright must be recorded on another type of register. Recordation is necessary to give effect against third parties, and gives priority over all competing parties
regardless of their knowledge of the security interest. If IP subject to a security
interest is infringed by a third party, the applicable law does not allow the secured creditor to take legal action to preserve the value of its security.
28.In Italy,the Italian Copyright Office is responsible for the General Public Register of
works protected as established by Article 103 of Law No. 633 of April 22, 1941.
Under Article 2 of Law No. 633, protection extends to printed works, sculpture,
painting, drawing, engraving and similar figurative arts, including scenic art, even where works are applied to industrial products (if their artistic value is distinct from the industrial character of the product with which they are associated), architectural plans and works, newspapers and magazines, musical works or works suitable for public showing, industrial design works, engineering projects and similar works.
Under Article 99 of the above-mentioned law, in order to exercise his or her right to remuneration, the author must include on the plan or drawing a declaration of
reservation of the right and must deposit the plan or drawing with the Italian
Copyright Office.Under Article 6 of the same law, in conjunction with Article 2576 of the (Italian) Civil Code; “copyright shall be acquired by creation of a work
resulting from an intellectual effort” and under Article106 of Law No.633; “failure to deposit shall not prejudice the acquisition or exercise of copyright in respect of works under the provisions of Part I of this law, or under the provisions of international
conventions [...]”. Moreover, under Article 106 of the above-mentioned law; “At the instance of the interested party, legal instruments executed between living persons, transferring in whole or in part rights recognized by this law, or establishing rights of enjoyment or guarantee thereof, as well as instruments serving to divide or to
associate such rights, may also be registered in the form prescribed by the Regulations.
Such registration shall also have such legal or administrative effects as the provisions of this Law or other special laws accord to registration”. The registration of the
instruments of transfer is one of the elements in proof of their date, under Article 2704 of the (Italian) Civil Code.
29.In Japan,security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws, such as the Japanese Civil Code, which makes some provision for the creation or granting of security rights. IP laws address issues related to the method for making the security interest effective against third parties and the priority to be given to them with respect to other assignments, licences or security interests; whereas the enforcement of security interests is dealt with by the Japanese Civil Execution Act. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP can be
recorded in an IP-specific register to become effective against third parties. Such recordation gives priority over all competing parties regardless of their knowledge of the security interest. A security interest in IP includes any proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP such as license fees, equitable remuneration, royalties or other
compensation. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, a
secured creditor is permitted to take legal action alone to preserve the value of its security, to collect damages, seek an injunction or both. However, there is no
provision addressing whether the debtor and secured creditor would have the
autonomy to determine in their agreement the right to take legal action.
30.In Kazakhstan,security interests in IP and related issues are not covered by national
IP laws, but only by other laws which address issues such as the creation or granting of security interests in IP, the method for making them effective against third parties and their enforcement. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP can be
recorded in any register although, upon their creation, they are considered to be
effective against third parties. Such a recordation has no effect over competing
parties. Security rights in IP do not include the proceeds realized from the exercise of the IP, such as license fees, equitable remuneration or security interests. If IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the relevant provisions provide that the secured creditor can take legal action alone to preserve the value of its security and, in doing so, the secured creditor may either collect damages, seek an injunction or both. The debtor and secured creditor have the autonomy to determine the right to do so in the agreement.
31.In Kenya, security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a mixture of
national IP laws and other laws. The Kenyan Industrial Property Regulations 2002, and in particular Regulation 30 on Patent Law, address issues such as the creation or granting of security interests in IP, whereas the methods for making security interests effective against third parties, the priority order to be given and their enforcement are not addressed by any provisions of law.
32.In the Republic of Korea,security interests in IP and related issues are covered by a
mixture of national IP laws and other laws. In cases where IP subject to a security interest is infringed by a third party, the Korean Copyright Act provides for the
method for making a security interest in IP effective against third parties, whereas the creation or granting of security interests, as well as the priority to be given to them with respect to other assignments, licenses or security interests and the enforcement of security interests in IP are all covered by the Civil Act. Under the applicable law, security interests in IP can be recorded in an IP-specific register to become effective against third parties. Such recordation gives priority over all competing parties
regardless of their knowledge. A security right in IP includes all proceeds realized
您好！这是一份关于大学生使用侵犯知识产权商品(文化传播领域范围)现状的调查。希望能借用您宝贵的2分钟，认真填写，吾将不胜感激！您不必担心资料外泄，我们采用匿名形式，只需要您对问题坦诚相告即可。 以下“侵犯知识产权的商品”简称侵权商品 1.您在生活中曾经购买或使用过以下几种侵权 知识产权的商品吗？（多选题） □图书（纸质）等出版领域，例如盗版图书 □电子图书、mp3、文章等网络文化传播领域，例如百度文库、免费下载歌曲□CD、DVD等电子音像领域，例如盗版CD □电脑应用软件、游戏等电脑程序领域，例如盗版游戏光盘、直接从网上下载□其他 2.您购买或使用侵权产品的频率高吗？ ○从不○偶尔○经常○一直 3. 您觉得侵权商品与您的日常生活的关系呢？ ○必须消除○比较重要 ○可有可无○完全离不开盗版 4. 促使您购买或使用侵权商品的因素有什么？（多选题） □价格便宜 □大家都在用 □盗版比正版早上市 □销售点多，购买方便 □内容丰富，覆盖面广 □已经习惯用侵权商品了 □购买过程中受欺骗，误以为是正版 □正版商品售后服务形同虚设，干脆买盗版 □其他＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿ 5. 您认为侵权商品的质量可以信赖吗？ ○一般，但是尚且可以使用 ○很好，可以与正版媲美 ○很差 6. 使用过侵权商品后的感觉是什么？ ○感觉质量像正品 ○感觉质量不怎么好，但也值这个价格，不后悔买 ○感觉质量不怎么好，但没有想要的高质量，宁愿买正品 ○感觉质量很差，不值这个价格，但也不会去买正品，但仍会继续卖侵权商品 ○感觉质量很差，不值这个价格，宁愿买正品 7. 您对侵权商品现状的态度是什么？ ○坚决抵制 ○可以接受，但不赞同 ○很好，乐于接受，也经常购买 8. 在你心中，如何看待只是产权侵权这种现象？ ○没什么大不了 ○违法法律，应严厉加以取缔 ○活跃了市场经济，应该得到鼓励 ○给了消费者更大的选择空间，提供了更高的性价比 ○其他 10. 您在使用侵权商品过程中，是否意识到自己行为与“知识产权侵权”有所联系？ ○完全没有意识 ○充分意识到，下次一定不用（买）侵权商品 ○意识到这么做是不太好，但不觉得会有什么错 ○意识到这是在助长知识产权侵权行为，但觉得自己一个人也没多大影响 ○其他＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿ 11. 您认为侵权商品队社会的危害有哪些？（多选题） □没什么危害 □扰乱市场秩序 □违背社会道德与法律 □侵犯正版的知识产权 □侵害消费者的合法权益 □一般侵权商品不受监管，内容不健康 □侵权商品不仅没有危害，反而促进了人们的文化生活 □其他 请选择您的基本信息 1.性别○男○女 2.年级○大一○大二○大三○大四 3.专业＿＿＿＿＿＿
新材料企业知识产权状况调查问卷企业名称： 企业地址： 知识产权负责人：工作部门： 职务/职称：联系电话： 电子邮箱：
一、企业基本情况调查 1. 企业资产规模：E A.50亿元以上 B.10-50亿元 C.1-10亿元 D.5000万-1亿元 E.1000- 5000万 F.500-1000万 G.500万以下 2. 企业法律形式和股权类型： D ② A.国有独资 B.有限责任公司→(是否为国有控股：①是②否) C.集体企业 D.股份有限公司 →(是否为国有控股：①是②否) E.联营企业 F.三资企业→(①中外合作②中外合资③外商独资) G.股份合作企业 H.私营企业 I.其他 3. 企业主要经营新材料产业的下属哪些领域(可多选)： A.新金属材料 B.高分子复合材料 C. 精细化工材料 D.生物及医用材料 E. 新型功能材料 F.其他 企业主打产品有（不少于两种产品） 4. 企业全年产品销售总收入 0.6 亿元，其中包含专利技术的产品销售收 入约为 0.5 亿元，约占总销售额的 83 %；
A.有 B.没有 如果有，贵企业与科研机构的合作方式是：（限选三项） A.直接转化科研院校的技术成果 B.与科研院校联合进行技术开发 C.聘请院校专家为顾问 D.利用科研院校的仪器设备 E.雇佣科研院校学生或研究人员在企业做兼职F 科研院校为企业提供各 种培训 G.其他（请说明：） 如果没有，原因是：(限选三项) A.科研院校技术不成熟，科研能力有限 B.科研院所的研发成果与市场需求存在差距 C.科研院校积极性不高 D.企业与科研院校利益分配不合理 E.企业在合作中主动权太小 F.沟通不畅，不知道科研院校能提供哪些技术或服务 G.其他（请注明：） 二、企业知识产权概况 10. 企业目前拥有以下哪几种形式的知识产权（可多选）： A.专利 B.商标 C.版权（包括软件著作权） D.厂商名 称 E.地理标志（包括货源标记与原产地名称） F.技术秘密 11. 企业专利申请及授权情况： (1) 企业申请国内专利数量件（其中国内发明申请件，实用新型 申请件，外观设计申请件）, 申请国外专利数量件； (2) 企业国内专利授权总量件（其中国内发明授权件，实用新 型授权件，外观设计授权件），国外专利授权数量件； (3) 引进专利件，其中国外专利引进件； (4) 企业是否有非专利技术（技术秘密）加以保护？ A.是 B.否 12. 企业是否委托专利事务所等中介机构撰写专利申请文件？ A. 是 B.否 13. 企业是否进行国外专利的申请？ A.是 B.否 14. 企业申请国外专利中遇到的困难有（可多选）： A.对目的国的相关专利制度不了解 B.国外专利局的审查周期过长 C.国外专利官费（申请费用和权利维护费用）过高 D.国外专利代理费用过高 E.其他 15. 企业就产品与工艺流程申请专利中，产品申请专利件；工艺流程 申请专利件。
中华人民共和国国家知识产权局因特网专利数据库及其检索 专利文献部赵欣 一、基本情况 中华人民共和国国家知识产权局网站是国家知识产权局支持建立的政府性官方网站，提供中、英两种版本。在2006年4月底进行全新改版后，增加了很多新的功能。中文版的中国专利检索数据库收录了1985年9月10日以来公布的全部国家知识产权局专利信息，包括发明、实用新型和外观设计三种专利的著录项目及摘要，并可浏览、下载和打印各种说明书全文及外观设计图形。该数据库由国家知识产权局知识产权出版社开发建立并维护，每周更新一次。同时，中华人民共和国国家知识产权局网站还提供和专利相关的多种信息服务，如近期专利公报的查询、专利证书发文信息查询、代理机构查询、法律状态查询、收费信息查询等。还可以链接到其它国家和地区的专利数据库。需要注意的是，此数据库面向公众提供免费专利检索服务。鉴于设备与带宽的限制，建议日浏览或下载专利说明书超过300页的公众访问其他网站或向相关单位订购专利光盘。 本章将介绍中文版国家知识产权局网站主要功能及中国专利检索数据库和法律状态查询。 二、主要功能 在Internet Explorer(浏览器)地址栏中键入网址：https://www.doczj.com/doc/3818145507.html,.，即可进入中华人民共和国国家知识产权局网站。在网站主页上可查看要闻、通知、国外和地方的知识产权动态等。 网站主页左侧有“文献服务”的链接，点击进入可以查看各项与专利文献有关的内容，包括文献与信息知识、文献与信息标准、国际专利分类表等。公众还可在文献与信息培训栏目中查看专利文献部面向社会公众的免费培训讲座信息，并可报名参加定期在专利文献馆举办的专利知识免费培训。 “文献服务”的链接下面有“图书期刊”的链接，点击进入可查看知识产权图书、知识产权期刊、专利公报和年报。 在“知识讲座”的链接下可看到一系列有关专利的知识问答，帮助公众了解相关专利知识及政策法规。 在页面右侧的中部可以看到“中国专利检索”栏，可以在“关键字”中输入检索式，选择相应的“检索项目”进行检索。 “中国专利检索”栏右侧还有“高级检索”的链接按钮，点击可进入相应的“专利检索”的页面。“专利检索”页面右侧有“IPC分类检索”、“本网站免责声明”、“数据库内容”、“注意事项”、“使用说明”、“说明书浏览器下载”的链接，供用户了解可供检索的数据库的内容，使用数据库及检索时应注意的事项，进行分类号与其他字段的组配检索。 在“中国专利检索”栏下点击“国外及港澳台专利检索”的下拉菜单，可直接进入国外政府网站及港澳检索数据库。 主页右下角有专利证书发文信息查询、代理机构查询、法律状态查询、通知书发文信息查询、收费信息查询、事务性公告查询、咨询台、意见反馈、年费计算系统等九项功能图标，
【调研问卷模板】知识产权问卷调查 1. 您对知识产权及相关国家政策的了解有多少？ 较深 略懂 听说过 不了解 2. 请分别写出您对正版物品和盗版物品的看法？ 正版 ____________ 盗版 ____________ 3. 您知道知识产权的定义吗？ 智力成果权 无形财产权 基于创造性智力成果和工商业标记依法产生的权利统称以上都是 4. 您是否使用过以下盗版产品? 盗版光碟 盗版书籍 网上免费的电影、音乐、小说等 山寨手机 假名牌 其他 无 5. 您对盗版有什么看法？ 物美价廉，赞同
非法，坚决抵制 好用就行，支持 虽然非法，但是低价位高效果才是硬道理 非常纠结 盗不盗版，不关我事 6. 你认为盗版有害于您的生活吗？ 有害无益 有益无害 有害有益 7. 您购买盗版的原因是什么？ ____________ 8. 您认为网络音乐和视频分享及免费下载是否归类为盗版？是 否 不清楚 9. 您购买过正版物品吗？ 买过 没买过 10. 您认为是否应该打击盗版、杜绝盗版，全力支持正版？是 否 与我无关 11. 您听说过下列哪些？ 《保护工业产权巴黎条约》 《专利合作条约》 《商标国际注册马德里协定》
《世界版权公约》 《保护文学和艺术作品伯尔尼公约》 世界知识产权组织（WIPO） 世界知识产权日 都没听说过 12. 您认为正版与盗版中，哪个价值大？ 正版 盗版 13. 您认为侵犯知识产权的行为对知识产权拥有人有损害吗？ 没有损害 损害非常大 有损害，但不是很严重，可以不计较 14. 您认为中国政府、法律对盗版产品的打击力度足够吗？ 足够 不够 不清楚 15. 某些人认为正版与盗版的区别不会影响物品本身，而价钱和实用性（即性价比）才是决定因素。您赞同吗？ 赞同 不赞同 16. 盗版的本质就是偷窃，盗版物品就是一种赃物。您认为对购买盗版物品者应否施加惩罚？ 应该 不应该 17. 您认为打击盗版主要依靠？
竭诚为您提供优质文档/双击可除国家知识产权专利检索 篇一：专利检索 关于专利检索相关问题的研究 一、意义 二、检索方法 三、多重价值 四、世界专利 五、检索系统 六、快速检索 七、高级检索 八、号码检索 九、途径 概念 专利检索就是根据一项或数项特征，从大量的专利文献或专利数据库中挑选符合某一特定要求的文献或信息的过程。对于企业的成长，对于全球生产力的节省与提高，是有举足轻重的作用的。
一、意义使企业明晰世界专利的动态、避免重复开发与资金浪费，对企业而言功劳甚大。由于全世界专利众多，且具有优先权的特征，任何人都不能保证自己的想法是世界上独一无二的，你能想到的发明专利，别人很有可能也想到，所以任何个人和企业在申请专利前，都应认真检索——是否自己的想法已经被别人实现，是否专利已经出现在世界各大专利局的数据库中而不自知。 专利研究和申请切不能存有侥幸心理，据不完全统计，各国因未查阅专利文献、使研究课题失去价值，每年造成的损失数以十亿计，间接损失就更多了，我国在“七五”期间，大众企业的近万个课题，约有三分之二都是重复研究。 所以，专利检索[3]对于企业的成长，对于全球生产力的节省与提高，是有举足轻重的作用的。 专利检索成为专利人和企业之间的一座桥梁，为推动专利转化做出了不朽的贡献，专利人只需提供，专利名称；专利人姓名；专利号等其中任何一项，企业就可以通过专利检索来查询专利的真实性和法律状态。 专利申请所需费用的一半甚至更多，但由于其中的重要作用，这一步骤已成为专利申请的必要步骤之一。专利申请前专利检索的作用和重要意义可以归纳为以下几点： 一、可以评价专利申请获得授权的可能性。 据国外专利机构调查，有66%以上的发明专利最后不能
知识产权调查问卷 单位名称： 填表人姓名：联系电话：传真： 填表人所在部门：电子邮箱： 联系人： XXXX知识产权服务有限公司 联系电话： Email： 声明： 本单位承诺保护填表单位的信息，保证不以任何借口、任何形式向第三方透露填表的信息。每一位调查单位的信息都将被作为最重要的资源得到妥善、安全的保管。
一、单位基本情况 2
二、知识产权积累 1．专利数据统计： 2．截至填表日申请注册商标总量（件）；已注册商标总量（件）；驰名商标总量（件）；著名商标件数（件）。 3．著作权登记（件）；其中计算机软件著作权登记（件）。 4．集成电路布图设计登记（件）。 5．已明确界定为本单位商业（技术）秘密加以保护的项数（项）。 6．如果上述5项均为零，其原因在于：（） A、没有需要知识产权保护的技术和产品； B、不了解如何保护知识产权； C、认为现有知识产权制度起不到保护作用，所以没有必要投入。
7．承担课题情况 三、知识产权管理 1．单位是否有专门的知识产权管理机构： 是（），工作人员数量：人，上级主管部门： 部门成立于：年 否（），因为：（a）领导尚未考虑；（b）企业规模较小，没有实际需要；（c）委托专业机构代为管理；（d）暂时没有，但在计划组建中。 2．单位是否有知识产权管理规章制度： 是（），包括：（a）专利保护制度；（b）商业秘密保护制度；（c）其他 否（），因为：（a）领导尚未考虑；（b）企业规模较小，没有实际需要；（c）不知道如何制定；（d）暂时没有，正在制定中。
3．单位的知识产权奖励调查： 4．在单位的年度预算中，是否包括知识产权经费预算： 是（），而且：（a）支出不能超出预算；（b）支出可超出预算。 否（），因为：（a）不可预计，按实际需要支出即可；（b）经费没有保障。5．在单位生产经营中是否有目的有计划的开展了知识产权工作（如专利、商标的申请等）： 是（），作用评价：（a）效果显著；（b）有一定效果；（c）看不到效果。 否（），因为：（a）企业规模较小，没有实际需要；（b）领导尚未考虑；（c）战略目前对企业没用；（d）不知道如何制定和实施。 6．知识产权工作人员是否参加本单位的技术立项、研发会议： 是（），做法：（a）已制度化，通常都参加；（b）视情况而定，领导或技术负责人要求时参加；（c）由知识产权部门自行决定。 否（），因为：（a）需要技术保密；（b）与知识产权无关；（c）没有作用。7．单位是否关注国内外竞争对手的专利、商标、版权等知识产权注册保护动向：是（），做法：（a）定期或经常；（b）随意或偶尔；（c）遇特定事件关注。 否（），因为：（a）没有必要；（b）没有精力；（c）不知道如何做。 8．单位内部是否定期或不定期举办知识产权培训： 是（），对象：（a）全体员工；（b）研发人员；（c）管理人员；（d）其他。 否（），因为：（a）没有需要；（b）可依靠社会上的培训。
专利权转让合同国家知识产权局 篇一：专利权转让合同签订指南 中华人民共和国专利局制 专利权转让合同 签订指南 前首（鉴于条款） ―--鉴于转让方（姓名或名称注:必须与所转让的专利的法律文件相一致） 拥有（专利名称注：必须与专利法律文件相一致)专利，其专利号公开号〔八位包括最后一位字母)，公告号（八位，包括最后 一位字母、申请日_____，授权日____，公开日____ ’专利权的有效期为______。 ―--鉴于受让方（姓名或名称〉对上述专利的了解,希望获得该专利权。 ―--鉴于转让方同意将其拥有的专 利权转让给受让方。
双方一致同意签订本合同。 第一条转让方向受让方交付资料 1 .向中国专利局递交的全部专利申 请文件〈附件1〉，包括说明书、权利要求书、附图、摘要及摘要附图、请求书、意见陈述书以及著录事项变更、权利丧 失后恢复权利的审批决定、代理委托书 等〈若申请的是？还要包括所有申请文件）。 2中国专利局发给转让方的所有文 件（附件2〉，包括受理通知书，中间文件,授权决定,专利证书及副 等。 3.转让方已许可他人实施的专利实 施许可合同书,包括合同书附件（即与实施该专利有关的技术,工艺等文件 4.中国专利局出具的专利权有效的 证明文件。指最近一次专利年费缴费凭 证在专利权撤销或无效请求中,中国专利局或专利复审委员会或人民法院做出 的维持专利权有效的决定等。 5.上级主管部门或国务院有关主管
部门的批准转让文件。 第二条交付资料的时间、地点及方式 1.交付资料的时间 合同生效后，转让方收到受让方支付给转让方的转让费后_____日内，转让方向受让主交付合同第一条所述的全部资料,或者合同生效后， ______日内转让方向受让方交付合同第一条所述的全部〔或部分)资料，如果是部分资料，待受让方将转让费交付给转让方后一日内，转让方向受让方交 付其余的资料。 2.交付资料的方式和地点 转让方将上述全部资料以面交、挂号邮寄或空运等方式递交给受让方，并 将资料清单以面交、邮寄或传真的方式递交给受让方，将空运单以面交、邮寄 方式递交给受让方。 全部资料的交付地点为受让方所在地或双方约定的地点。 第三条专利实施和实施许可的情况
知识产权问卷调查(学生) 填卷人信息：所属专业所在年级 1、您在此前了解有关知识产权方面的内容吗？ A、相当了解 B、一般了解 C、听说过 D、不知道 2、您通过何种途径接触过知识产权？ A、亲身经历 B、新闻报道 C、报纸期刊及相关书籍（含电子版） D、身边人介绍 E、老师上课讲授或提及 F、学校知识产权双专业的宣传及讲座 3、下列专利的种类，您知道的有 A、发明 B、实用新型 C、外观设计 D、其他 4、在你购买产品时，是否会注意到???这几个标记？ A、注意过，并知道含义 B、注意过，但不知道含义 C、似乎看到过 D、没有注意过 5、您认为大学生们没有对自己的专利成果及创意进行保护的原因是什么？ A、对自己的创意没有足够的信心，不知道什么阳的成果能得到法律的保护 B、认为自己的作品可能会和他人有雷同的情况 C、不知道应该如何保护或申请专利 D、怕麻烦，觉得没必要 6、您是否了解创业中知识产权的重要性？ A、不知道创业中还要涉及到知识产权 B、了解一点皮毛 C、大体知道 D、十分了解 7、如果你想申请专利，你想向下面哪个部门申请？（单选） A、省市专利管理机关 B、国家知识产权局 C、工商局 D、学校或所在单位 E、不知道 8、 9、如果您遇到知识产权纠纷，会选择什么样的解决方法？ A、与对方协商解决 B、通过仲裁方式 C、通过知识产权行政部门解决 D、提起知识产权诉讼 10、您对知识产权保护持何种态度？ A、非常重要，这关乎到国家、企业、个人的发展及利益 B、比较重要，稍微加以保护即可 C、可有可无，知识是无界限的，随用随取 D、没有观点 11、以下行为你认为是对知识产权侵犯的是？（可多选） A、生产冒牌产品 B、购买盗版光碟 C、复制正版影碟送给朋友看 D、购买正版光碟后转为MP3并供人下载 E、写论文时大篇幅引用他人作品 F、复印同学笔记G拷贝老师课件H、窃取他人思路搞创作 12、您认为学校或部门应采取哪些具体措施引导和促进学生知识产权意识的提高？（多选题） A、加强知识产权保护与管理的意识：例如加大资金投入，建立健全的高校知识产权激励机制；推广教育创新，完善知识产权人才培养的规模、层次及结构；设立知识产权必修课，普及相关知识 B、增加科技、实践、学术类的比赛和活动，树立浓厚的学术气氛，形成良性的竞争环境 C、帮助和引导符合条件的学生申请专利保护 D、学校并无义务为提高学生知识产权保护意识而进行额外的工作 13、如果您所在的地方组织知识产权专题活动，您是否愿意参加 A、很愿意 B、比较愿意 C、一般 D、不参加 感谢您的参与，祝您学业有成，前程似锦！
专利查询系统调查问卷 为了更好地为社会提供服务，提高对社会的服务质量和效率，特制作此专利查询调查问卷。请您给予支持，我们将会根据调查得到的需求情况，依据法律、行政法规规定，构建专利查询系统。下列问题均为选择题，可单选或多选。请您记下xx 邮件地址，或者xx传真，可以将任何有关专利查询的建议发给我们，问卷接收时间截止到20xx年12月15日。您的任何意见或建议对我们都很重要。非常感谢您的合作！ 1、请问您的身份? A、专利申请人 B、专利权人 C、专利代理人 D、科研院所或企业的工作者 E、一般公众 F、地方知识产权管理机关工作者 2、(如果您是专利申请人或本专利申请案的代理人，请回答此题)请问您需要对自己申请或代理的尚未公开发明专利申请案卷、授权前的实用新型专利申请案卷、授权前的外观设计专利申请案卷查询哪些内容? A、从国家知识产权局专利局保存的申请案卷中复制申请文件 B、查阅初步审查中向申请人发出的通知书和决定书以及申请人对通知书的答复意见正文 C、了解申请相关期限情况 D、了解申请的缴费情况
F、了解国家知识产权局专利局审查意见通知书的发出以及对审查意见通知书答复是否收到的情况 G、获取审查员姓名及联系方式 3、您对处于何种状态的专利文件需要查询? A、已经公开并进入实质审查阶段但尚未授予专利权的发明专利申请案卷 B、已经公布审结但未授权(包括视为撤回、主动撤回、被驳回等情况)的发明专利申请 C、已经授予专利权的专利申请案卷（发明专利、实用新型专利、外观设计专利） D、处于复审程序、无效宣告程序之中尚未结案的专利申请案卷 E、视为未提出、不予受理、主动撤回、视为撤回的复审和无效案卷 F、已经审结的复审案件、无效宣告案件的案卷 G、专利权已经终止的案卷 4、您对已经公开但尚未授予专利权的发明专利申请案卷中的哪些文件需要查询并请简述原因？ A、申请文件 B、与申请直接有关的手续文件 C、初步审查中向申请人发出的通知书和决定书以及申请人对通知书的答复意见正文
【问卷模板】企业知识产权保护调查问卷 1. 贵司的企业性质 国有及国有控股企业 民营企业 集体企业 股份制企业 合资 外商独资 2. 贵司是否有独立从事知识产权管理的部门或人员 有专门的知识产权部门，且有专职知识产权管理人员 没有专门的知识产权管理部门，担忧专职知识产权管理人员。企业内部人员兼职进行知识产权管理 目前正考虑建立知识产权管理部门 目前阶段没必要建立知识产权管理部门 3. 在贵企业的年度预算中，是否包括知识产权经费预算 是 否 4. 贵公司知识产权集中在哪些方面？（多选） 专利 商标 版权 商业秘密 5. 贵司是否遇到过以下知识产权纠纷（可多选） 有，遇到过商标方面的纠纷
有，遇到过专利方面的纠纷 有，遇到过版权方面的纠纷 有，遇到过商业秘密方面的纠纷 无，至今未遇到知识产权纠纷 6. 贵司是否有知识产权相关章程或规定？ 是 否 7. 贵司采取何种方式解决？ 由企业负责知识产权的员工进行处理 委托企业外的代理人，律师进行处理 由非知识产权相关负责人员进行处理 8. 贵企业在遭遇知识产权纠纷的问题上一般采用什么途径解决？通过行政途径 通过协商解决 到法院起诉 置之不理 9. 贵司在知识产权工作的过程中主要面临哪些问题？ 资金不足 知识产权管理人才缺乏 知识产权法律制度不健全 市场对新技术接受程度低 社会氛围不利 其他 10. 您认为侵犯哪一类知识产权对贵司损失严重？ 商业秘密
商标权 专利权 著作权 其他知识产权 没有太多差异，都差不多 11. 您认为企业知识产权保护的不足主要有哪些？（可多选） 技术积累不够 不了解知识产权方面知识 缺乏知识产权方面人才 知识产权保护和扶植力度不够 知识产权意识比较薄弱 12. 知识产权在促进单位技术创新方面的作用 很大 比较大 一般 很小 13. 贵企业认为加强企业知识产权管理，从内部环境看最需要解决的措施是. 建立健全知识产权规章制度 建立知识产权管理机构，明确相应的职责 企业高层领导的重视 充实知识产权管理人员，提高业务素质 加大知识产权管理资金投入 加强企业员工的培训，提高知识产权意识 其他
竭诚为您提供优质文档/双击可除国家知识产权局笔试 篇一：20XX国家知识产权局专业科目考试、面试、体检和考察通知 福建中公教育。给人改变未来的力量20XX国家知识产权局专业科目考试、面试、体检和考察通知根据中组部、人力资源社会保障部、国家公务员局20XX年度考试录用公务员工作要求，现将国家知识产权局20XX年考试录用公务员专业科目考试、面试、体检和考察的有关事项通知如下： 一、专业科目考试 凡进入国家知识产权局面试名单人员，均须参加mAp职业性格测试(网上测试)和专业科目考试。 (一)mAp职业性格测试 请各位考生于20XX年2月27日10:00-3月3日18:00登陆以下网址参加在线测评,请考生务必参加，如不参加视自动放弃。 网址https://www.doczj.com/doc/3818145507.html, (二)专业考试时间、地点和乘车路线
1.专业考试时间：20XX年3月8日(周日)下午 14:00——16:00 2.专业考试地点：国家知识产权局(北京市海淀区蓟门桥西土城路6号) 3.请参加专业考试的考生，于3月8日上午09:00-10:00携带本人身份证到国家知识产权局西门领取专业科目考试准考证。 4.考试时请携带身份证、公共科目笔记准考证、专业科目考试准考证提前15分钟到达考场。 5.乘车路线: 北京站：出站后乘坐地铁2号线在“西直门站”站下车，换13号线(东直门方向)，在“大钟寺”站下车，向东步行700米至蓟门桥东北角，或转乘公交425、运通201路等在“蓟门桥东”站下车即到。 北京西站北广场：乘坐21、387、694路到“蓟门桥东”站下车即到。 北京北站：乘坐438、562路车到“蓟门桥”站下车即到。 乘坐地铁10号线在“西土城”站下车东南口出站，往南走600米即到。 (三)专业考试要求 1.参加专业英语考试的考生，请携带身份证、公共科目
知识产权分析报告 一、xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx关键技术项目涉及的知识产权及其权属， 合法性与稳定性分析；
主要专注在XX技术，主要围绕技术特征采用开发的xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx关键技术，在半金属、低金属、非金属xxxxCCCCxx的制备方法、摩擦材料应用的工艺上突破，技术稳定，专利集中在企业核心骨干的职务发明，所有权都为公司所有，研发团队相当稳定，技术人员梯度合理和衔接顺畅，专利检索和文献查新过程中在所检文献以及时限范围内，国内外未见文献报道。 二、知识产权对相关经济活动的作用及影响分析； 公司以技术中心为主体，以项目小组为落实体，在研发阶段和生产、检测过程中提升知识产权的引导力。让项目的知识产权成为科技、经济和法律相结合的典型形式，促进和保障科技进步和经济发展的基本法律机制，其内容和作用形式主要表现为激励机制、调节机制以及规范与保障机制。 为了有效地发挥知识产权机制促进和保障技术进步和经济发展的作用，必须注意对知识产权法律制度加以及时与合理的完善。知识经济的兴起使现有的知识产权法律制度在保护范围、保护期限、保护力度等方面都面临新的问题，需要及时作出调整和变革。但企业在完善时还应注意其合理与适度的问题，尤其要处理好鼓励知识的生产与促进知识的传播、利用的关系以及遵循专
利申报与适当保护技术机密之间的关系。 知识产权之所以是科技、经济和法律相结合的产物，客体主要是科技成果，其内容是法定权利，其核心是法律的确认和保护，其目的和后果是企业和团队获得经济利益，促进产业经济的发展。科技成果无疑是知识产权的核心部分，其在知识经济的发展中起着龙头作用。 正如美国专利与商标局副局长卡森斯基所言：“科技发展的速度已成为经济增长的主导因素，而知识产权则是经济发展的动力。”在现有的国际环境中，综合国力的增强日益突出地表现为以专利为代表的科技创新、发明，提高整体的创新能力。有人甚至提出知识产权问题是一个国家的经济主权问题，衡量一个企业的科技水平和创新能力的标志。 知识产权机制是促进和保障技术进步和经济发展的重要法律机制。知识产权必然与法律联系在一起，知识产权机制实质上是一种法律机制。倘若产权未能得到界定和保护，则创新的积极性只能依赖于一点零星的自发性，但是，知识的创造需要巨大的智力和物力投入，并伴随着巨大的风险，尤其是现代高技术的开发需要付出更高的代价，如果别人可以任意地、无偿地利用他人的智力创造成果，那幺知识创造者的利益就得不到保护，其继续智力创造的积极性就会受到抑制，最终会阻碍科技的进步和经济的发展。 首先，知识产权的激励机制在于知识产权法基于知识创造
【问卷模板】大学生知识产权意识调查问卷 1. 您的性别是？ 男 女 2. 您现在的学历是 大一 大二 大三 大四 其他 3. 所属专业类型 理工类 文史类 艺术类 4. 此前您有了解过知识产权的相关知识吗？ 了解，学过相关知识 听说过，有一定了解 一般，不太了解 从未听说过 5. 您主要从哪些途径了解知识产权相关信息或知识 专业知识的学习 从实践中吸取经验 向相关专家、学者或老师交谈、请教 报刊、电视、网络等各种媒体
查阅相关书籍 询问同学 听相关讲座 其他 6. 下列知识产权种类，您知道或听说过得有？ A、商标权 B、版权或著作权（包括计算机软件著作权） C、邻接权地理标志 D、工业品外观设计权 E、专利 F、论文 G、反不正当竞争权 H、未披露的信息专有权 7. 您是否参加过学校或其他组织举行的有关知识产权的课程、论坛、讲座？ A、是 B、否 8. 是否接受过知识产权的相关教育 A、有，学校必修课 B、有，学校选修课 C、没有 9. 您认为高校有没有开设知识产权理论课的必要 A、有 B、没有 C、无所谓
10. 每年的几月几号是“世界知识产权日”？ A、4月16日 B、4月26日 C、4月30日 D、记不清了或不知道 11. 你知道我国专利法规定发明专利的保护期限是多少年吗？ A、自申请日起10年 B、自申请日起20年 C、自授权公告日起20年 D、自授权公告日起10年 E、记不清了或不知道 12. 如果您想申请专利，您会向下列哪个部门申请？ A、国家知识产权局 B、自治区知识产权局 C、南宁市知识产权局 D、县区知识产权局 E、工商局 F、学校或所在单位 G、其他 13. 您自己或身边的朋友有没有将自己的发明创造申请专利保护 A、有，正准备申请或者已经申请 B、有想法，但不知道操作流程 C、很多人认为没必要 D、没有或不知道 14. 您是否常在网上下载音乐、电影、书籍？
竭诚为您提供优质文档/双击可除国家知识产权局邮箱 篇一：国家知识产权局专利检索步骤 国家知识产权局专利检索步骤 1、按照网址：登陆中华人民共和国国家知识产权局网站。 2、点击“专 利检索”（见上图箭头指示）。 3、点击“专利检索与服务系统”（见上图箭头指示）。 4、点击“同意”（见上图箭头指示）。 5、点击“专利检索”（见上图箭头指示）。 6、输入关键词（见上图箭头指示）。 7、点击“检索”（见上图箭头指示）。 8、向下翻页（见上图箭头指示）。 9、点击“查看文献详细信息”（见上图箭头指示）。 10、点击“全文图像”（见上图箭头指示）。 篇二：国家知识产权局办公室关于开展知识产权纠纷调解试点验收工作的通知-国家规范性文件
综合法律门户网站 国家知识产权局办公室关于开展知识产权纠纷调解试 点验收工 作的通知 北京市、山东省、广东省、新疆维吾尔自治区知识产权局： 为加强知识产权保护，完善知识产权纠纷多元化解决机制，探索为权利人提供更多替代性争议解决途径和维权选择，20XX年，国家知识产权局确定你局作为第二批知识产权纠纷调解试点单位，组织开展本地区相关试点工作。 按照《国家知识产权局办公室关于开展知识产权纠纷调解试点工作的通知》（国知办发协字〔20XX〕5号）要求，国家知识产权局拟于20XX年5月组织开展知识产权纠纷调解 试点验收工作。请各单位按照项目协议书要求，对照工作方案中确定的目标任务，总结试点期间开展的主要工作、取得的成果与经验、存在的问题等，形成总结报告（报告模板见附件），并于20XX年5月15日前将总结报告（纸件和电子件）报送至保护协调司。 特此通知。 联系人：保护协调司许谅亮朱丹 电话：010-6208347062083331 邮箱：xuliangliang@sipo．gov．cn
知识产权调查表 Document number：PBGCG-0857-BTDO-0089-PTT1998
合格供应商知识产权状况调查表 单位名称上海海鼎实业发展有限公司 填报日期 一、单位基本情况 1、单位全称：上海海鼎实业发展有限公司； 单位地址：上海市朱家角工业园区康工路101号； 联系人：周凤叶；联系电话：； 传真：；E-mail： 单位类型：□国有企业□股份有限公司□私营企业□外商投资企业□集体企业□中外合资企业■有限责任公司 2、单位所属行业 □电子信息及软件产业□光机电一体化产业□新材料产业 ■新能源与高效节能产业□环保产业□农业产业 □生物和医药产业□其它（请注明） 3、企业的经营方式 □技术创新型■生产加工型□服务型□商贸型 □出口导向型□其它（请注明） 4、单位职工人数 □10-99人■100-500人□500-1000人□1001-5000人□5000人以上 其中从事科研开发的人数 □10人以下□11-50人■51-100人□101人以上 5、单位上年度产值 □100万以下□100-500万□501-1000万□1001-5000万■5000万以上 二、知识产权工作情况 6、知识产权工作的主管机构 □无工作机构□知识产权办公室■科研（科技）处□其它（请注明） 7、知识产权工作的主管人员 □无主管人员□单位第一领导■单位分管领导□部门负责人□一般人员8、知识产权工作的专职人员 □0人■1-2人□3-5人以上□6人以上 9、是否有知识产权管理制度 ■是□否□起草中 10、是否有知识产权战略 ■是□否□起草中 11、是否有知识产权信息库
□是□否■拟建中 12、最近2年单位是否开展或参加过有关知识产权宣传、教育、培训活动 ■是□否□计划中 13、最近2年参加过知识产权培训活动的人数占公司职工总数的百分比 □5％以下□10％以下■11％-50％□51％-80％□80％以上 三、单位知识产权实施情况 14、累计申请中国专利 34 项，其中发明 2 项；实用新型 21 项；外观设计 11 项 15、累计申请外国专利项，其中发明项；实用新型项；外观设计项 16、供给我公司的产品涉及知识产权内容 发明项；实用新型项；外观设计项；注册商标数量件 17、累计注册商标数量 3 件，其中国际注册件，驰名商标件 18、累计申请原产地保护件 19、累计登记计算机软件 ■无□1-5件□6-20件□21-50件□50件以上 20、截止到2014年6月底，单位是否发生过知识产权纠纷 □是■否 21、发生知识产权纠纷时，选择的维权途径 ■协商解决□提起诉讼解决□请求管理机关调解 22、单位知识产权维权方式（可多选） ■诉讼■调解■打假□海关扣押 23、参与UL标志打假工作 □是■否 24、面临的主要竞争来自 ■国内厂商□国外厂商□国内外厂商均等 25、面对国内外竞争对手的压力主要来自于（可多选） ■专利产品和专利技术■营销手段□产品质量■产品价格 ■专有技术□售后服务□品牌影响力□其它 26、单位核心产品或技术是否具有专利权 □无■有□已申请专利 27、企业是否有获取知识产权的需求： □是■否 28、企业在知识产权工作的过程中主要面临哪些问题（可多选） ■资金不足■知识产权管理人才缺乏 □知识产权法律制度不健全□市场对创新技术接受程度低 □社会气氛不利□其它（请注明）
中华人民共和国国家知识产权局 申请实用新型专利的，申请文件应当包括：实用新型专利请求书、摘要、摘要附图（适用时）、说明书、权利要求书、说明书附图，各一式两份。 一、如何办理专利申请 办理专利申请应当提交必要的申请文件，并按规定缴纳费用。专利申请必须采用纸件形式或者电子申请的形式办理。不能用口头说明或者提供样品或模型的方法，来代替纸件或电子申请文件。 各种手续文件都应当按规定签章，签章应当与请求书中填写的姓名或者名称完全一致。签章不得复印。涉及权利转移的手续，应当有全体申请人签章，其他手续可以由申请人的代表人签章办理，委托专利代理机构的，应当由专利代理机构签章办理。 办理手续要附具证明文件或者附件的，证明文件与附件应当使用原件或者副本，不得使用复印件。如原件只有一份的，可以使用复印件，但同时需要附有公证机关出具的复印件与原件一致的证明。 二、提交申请时如何排列申请文件 发明或者实用新型专利申请文件应按下列顺序排列：请求书、说明书摘要、摘要附图、权利要求书、说明书、说明书附图。外观设计专利申请文件应按照请求书、图片或照片、简要说明顺序排列。申请文件各部分都应当分别用阿拉伯数字顺序编号。 三、申请文件的纸张要求 申请文件的纸张质量应相当于复印机用纸的质量。纸面不得有无用的文字、记号、框、线等。各种文件一律采用A4尺寸（210毫米×297毫米）的纸张。 申请文件的纸张应当纵向使用。文字应当自左向右排列，纸张左边和上边应各留25毫米空白，右边和下边应当各留15毫米空白，以便于出版和审查时使用。申请文件各部分的第一页必须使用国家知识产权局统一制定的表格。这些表格可以在专利局受理大厅的咨询处索要，也可以向各地的专利局代办处索取或直接从国家知识产权局网站下载。 四、申请文件的文字和书写要求 申请文件各部分一律使用汉字。外国人名、地名和科技术语如没有统一中文译文，应当在中文译文后的括号内注明原文。申请人提供的附件或证明是外文的，应当附有中文译文，申请文件（包括请求书在内）都应当用宋体、仿宋体或楷体打字或印刷，字迹呈黑色，字高应当在3.5～4.5毫米之间，行距应当在2.5～
专利尽职调查报告 专利尽职调查报告 一、调查目的 受某知识产权局委托，赴公司进行专利问卷调研，了解企业或个人对于专利的申请、运用和保护的情况，鉴于此作为国家专利政策的实施方向。 二、调查对象 某市慈溪市指定被调研企业及个人 三、调查方式 携专利问卷前往指定的不同企业找到公司的专利负责人做问卷调查并留下其联系方式，盖好公司公章。个人问卷要求填写相关真实信息。 四、调查时间：20**年7月20日――――20**年08月20日 五、调查内容 专利问卷分为a与b卷，分别为企业专利权人信息和专利信息，主要针对公司对于专利的申请、运用和保护的情况。 六、调查结果 问卷完成率在95%左右，成功地完成了老师规定的完成率，靠自己实践奋斗而获得社会经验和锻炼的能力。 七、调查感想 第一次参加大学的暑期社会实践活动，我明白了大学生社会实践是引导我们大学生走出校门，走向社会，接触社会，了解社会，投身社会的良好形式;是培养锻炼才干的好渠道;是提升思想，修身养性，树立服务社会
的思想的有效途径。通过参加社会实践活动，有助于我们在校大学生更新观念，吸收新的思想与知识。近一个月的社会实践，一晃而过，却让我从中领悟到了很多的东西，而这些东西将让我终生受用。社会实践加深了我与社会各阶层人的感情，拉近了我与社会的距离，也让自己在社会实践中开拓了视野，增长了才干，进一步明确了我们青年学生的成材之路与肩负的历史使命。社会才是学习和受教育的大课堂，在那片广阔的天地里，我们的人生价值得到了体现，为将来更加激烈的竞争打下了更为坚实的基础。我在实践中得到许多的感悟! 从问卷下发的第二周起，我开始落实自己的任务。因为我先选择了几家附近的几个镇的企业，所以我骑车去做了调查。一周后，我乘公车又去了较远的几家公司和个人住址。期间碰到不少的冷漠拒绝，但我一次次登门，一次次请求，最终在老师和科技局的帮助下坎坷完成了大半任务。调查中，我要感谢王宇华和廖红老师，她们帮助我解决了很多调查中的难题。我也会在每周三周六询问每位调查成员的调查状况以及出现的问题，向老师汇报工作进度。老师发来的相关文件都认真阅读，具体落实里面补充的要求。在调研期限的最后一周，我们小组分组进行远的镇的调查。当然组队任务的问卷数目是根据实际情况划分到参加此次任务的每位组员完成数中。炎热的天气，漫长的道路，不可预料的冷遇，一次次打击着我们组员的信心，磨练着我们的意志。为了确保每份问卷的完整性和准确性，我们在当场进行问卷后，回去仍然要根据规则检查几遍。有时一天下来，人晒黑了，又受到冷漠的待遇，在没有交通工具的条件下行走十几公里就是为了寻找可能已经不存在的公司或个人，疲惫得竟然可以在回家途中的大巴
国家专利局是怎么审查专利的 中华人民共和国专利局是国家知识产权局的下属部门，国家知识产权局专利局主要承担专利业务工作及相关的服务性工作，受理专利申请，收缴专利费用，从事专利申请相关事物的查询、咨询等工作。 该项目的建成，不仅可以使专利申请人方便、快捷地递交专利申请文件，还可以提供更直接、更高效的咨询服务，为专利申请人节省了时间、降低了成本，缩短了申请专利周期。 主要职责 一、受国务院委托，对专利法和专利法实施细则提出修订方案，并负责解释专利法实施细则;参与制订相关的知识产权法规。 二、依法受理、审查申请专利的工作，对符合专利法规定的发明创造授予专利权;对复审、撤消和专利权无效宣告请求进行审查并作出决定。 三、制订全国专利事业发展规划和发展战略，指定专利工作的方针、政策，经批准后组织实施。 四、指导、协调地方、部门专利管理机关调处专利纠纷和查处冒充专利行为的工作。 五、制订有关政策、法规，规范和指导专利许可贸易;参与、指导以知识产权的评估为主要内容的无形资产评估工作。 六、规划、推动专利法的宣传普及和专利队伍的培训工作，负责专利代理人的考核和资
格确认工作，审批专利代理机构，指定涉外专利代理机构。 七、管理国家专利文献，向社会提供专利信息服务;指导部门、地方的专利文献和专利信息工作，加强专利信息向社会各个领域的传播，促进信息产业的发展。 八、管理专利工作的国际联络、合作、交流活动，参与和协调知识产权方面的涉外事务。 九、完成国务院交办的其它工作。 内设机构 一、办公室 二、人事教育部 三、审查业务管理部
四、初审及流程管理部 1 负责受理专利申请 2 负责接受专利申请的中间文件及其他各类请求文件; 3 负责发明专利申请初步审查; 4 负责专利档案的管理; 5 负责颁发专利证书; 6 负责编辑出版专利公报和专利说明书; 7 负责收取并管理专利费用; 8 负责和组织发明、实用新型专利申请的分类及研究工作。 五、机械发明审查部 六、电学发明审查部 七、通信发明审查部 八、医药生物发明审查部 九、化学发明审查部 十、光电技术发明审查部 十一、材料工程发明审查部 十二、外观设计审查部简介 负责外观设计专利申请的分类、审查与授权负责外观设计专利申请授权前及授权后的流程管理和事务处理;负责外观设计专利申请和专利档案的管理;负责外观设计专利申请和专利