下载文档原格式
《技术性贸易壁垒研究》篇一一、引言随着全球化进程的推进，技术性贸易壁垒逐渐成为国际贸易中的重要问题。
技术性贸易壁垒，主要指一国通过实施各种技术性措施，来限制或控制其他国家商品进入本国市场，以达到保护本国产业、环境和人类健康等目的。
这种非关税性质的贸易限制措施对国际贸易的影响日益凸显，对企业的国际化经营也提出了新的挑战。
本文将对技术性贸易壁垒的成因、类型、影响及应对策略进行研究分析。
二、技术性贸易壁垒的成因及类型1. 成因技术性贸易壁垒的产生，一方面源于各国对产品安全、环保、健康等方面的关注度不断提高，希望通过设立技术标准、认证制度等手段保护本国消费者利益；另一方面，也是国际贸易竞争激烈的结果，一些国家通过设置技术性贸易壁垒来保护本国产业免受外来竞争的冲击。
2. 类型技术性贸易壁垒主要包括技术法规、技术标准、合格评定程序、检验检疫措施等类型。
其中，技术法规主要规定产品的性能、安全、环保等方面的要求；技术标准则是对技术法规的具体化，为产品生产和检验提供依据；合格评定程序则是对产品是否符合技术标准进行评估和认证的程序；检验检疫措施则是对进口产品进行检验检疫，以保护本国安全和健康。
三、技术性贸易壁垒的影响技术性贸易壁垒对国际贸易的影响主要体现在以下几个方面：1. 增加企业成本：企业需要满足进口国的技术标准、认证制度等要求，需要投入更多的资源进行产品研发、检测和认证，从而增加企业的成本。
2. 限制市场准入：技术性贸易壁垒可能使一些不符合进口国标准的企业和产品被排除在市场之外，限制了企业的市场准入。
3. 引发贸易争端：由于各国技术性贸易壁垒的设置存在差异，容易引发贸易争端和摩擦。
4. 促进技术创新：在应对技术性贸易壁垒的过程中，企业需要加强技术创新和研发，提高产品的质量和竞争力，从而推动产业升级和经济发展。
四、应对技术性贸易壁垒的策略面对技术性贸易壁垒，企业应采取以下策略：1. 加强技术研发和产品创新：企业应加大技术研发和产品创新的投入，提高产品的质量和竞争力，以满足进口国的技术标准和市场需求。
题目：技术性贸易壁垒对出口旳影响一、引言技术性贸易壁垒具有内容复杂，实行隐蔽灵活，近年来成为发达国家对发展中国家实行保护主义旳一项重要手段。
其对我国出口具有极大影响，一直是我国贸易研究领域旳热点问题。
为了更好地理解近几十年来技术性贸易壁垒旳研究水平，本文重要论述了国内外技术性贸易壁垒旳研究现实状况和技术性贸易壁垒旳研究展望，尤其是我国各个行业怎样应对技术性贸易壁垒旳负面影响值得我们思索和研究。
二、技术性贸易壁垒旳研究现实状况（一）技术性贸易壁垒涵义“贸易技术壁垒(Technical Barriers To Trade—TBT)”一词，正式出现于世界贸易组织旳《贸易技术壁垒协定》(WTO／TBT协议)中，其作用是：“期望保证技术法规和原则，包括对包装、标志和标签旳规定，以及对技术法规和原则旳合格评估程序不给国际贸易制造不必要旳障碍。
”目前国内对TBT概念旳争论重要可概括两种观点（金祥荣，2023）：一是认为技术性贸易壁垒是一种贸易障碍，扭曲了国际贸易，是与贸易自由化相背离旳。
另一种观点(朱钟棣，2023)则是认为技术性贸易壁垒与技术性贸易措施是等同概念，与否对贸易导致消极影响应详细分析。
狭义旳TBT所采用旳技术性措施大都能用数量指标量化或通过明细旳操作规程来实现，重要包括技术规章与规范、产品检查、检疫制度与措施、包装和标签规定以及绿色壁垒。
而在广义范围内，现代旳TBT既包括老式旳以数量指标量化和明细操作规程为主旳技术性贸易措施，也包括以劳工原则等社会条款为主旳贸易措施。
技术性贸易壁垒旳本质是政府调整贸易利益旳重要手段，是政府调控和规范市场旳手段，也是高新技术产品新旳竞争手段，各国采用技术性贸易壁垒旳主线目旳是维护本国利益。
当真正意义上旳全球经济一体化实现后，产品生产链旳各个环节将分布于不一样国家，各利益方为减少贸易障碍，通过经济手段互相影响和渗透，有助于减弱聊对生产环节旳影响，关税与其他非关税壁垒旳趋弱与消灭就符合这样旳趋势。
《技术性贸易壁垒研究》篇一一、引言在当今的全球经济体系中，贸易自由化进程虽然取得了一定的进展，但同时各国的贸易壁垒仍然普遍存在。
技术性贸易壁垒（Technical Barriers to Trade，TBT）是这些贸易壁垒中重要的一类。
它们主要涉及产品标准、质量、安全、环保等方面的规定，对国际贸易产生深远影响。
本文旨在深入探讨技术性贸易壁垒的成因、影响及其应对策略。
二、技术性贸易壁垒的成因技术性贸易壁垒的产生主要由两方面原因构成。
首先，各国的法规和标准制定具有一定的自主性，为了保护本国消费者和环境等利益，各国的政策制定者往往会设置一定程度的标准，以此来规范进口商品的质量和安全。
其次，国际贸易中的竞争压力和不确定性使得一些企业会利用技术性贸易壁垒来保护自身利益，以应对外来竞争压力。
三、技术性贸易壁垒的影响技术性贸易壁垒对国际贸易的影响是多方面的。
首先，它们可能增加贸易成本，降低贸易效率。
由于各国的技术标准、法规和认证程序不同，企业需要投入更多的资源来满足不同国家的要求，这无疑增加了企业的运营成本和贸易难度。
其次，技术性贸易壁垒可能引发贸易争端和冲突。
由于一些技术性贸易壁垒的设置可能被视为不公平或歧视性的，因此可能引发国际贸易摩擦和冲突。
最后，技术性贸易壁垒也可能影响全球供应链的稳定性和效率。
四、技术性贸易壁垒的应对策略面对技术性贸易壁垒，企业应采取积极的应对策略。
首先，企业应加强技术研发和创新，提高产品的质量和安全性，以满足不同国家的技术标准和法规要求。
其次，企业应积极参与国际标准的制定和修订工作，以影响国际标准的制定方向和内容。
此外，企业还应加强与各国认证机构的合作和交流，以便更顺利地完成产品认证工作。
最后，政府在面对技术性贸易壁垒时也应采取相应措施，如推动多边和双边贸易谈判，争取减少或消除不合理的技术性贸易壁垒。
五、案例分析以某国针对进口电子产品设置的技术性贸易壁垒为例，该国对进口电子产品的安全性能、电磁兼容性等有严格的规定和要求。
文献综述一、国外研究现状20 世纪70 年代以来，在西方学者的一些研究中开始涉及技术性贸易壁垒，，进入20 世纪90 年代，由于乌拉圭回合对技术性贸易壁垒的高度重视，西方学者对这一问题的研究开始大量出现。
比较有代表性的有Victor Ginsburg，Michel Keizer；Outskirt，Wilson J S等。
后来的学者从经济理论角度对技术性贸易壁垒进行了较为深入的研究。
Dong-hyu Kima，Heejin Leea，Jooyoung Kwakb，DongBack Seoc（2014）研究了标准的贸易保护效果，结论是政府制定的最小标准即使表面非歧视，也是贸易保护的。
在实证研究方面，Yuan Li，John C.Beghin.（2012）也做了探索，调查收集了大量的行业数据，并据以分析技术性贸易壁垒影响贸易成本的程度，结论是达到OECD成员国不同的技术法规与标准所需要支出的成本，加上测试与认证成本，占到企业总生产成本的2%到10%。
从上面的文献综述可以看出，国外研究者在技术性贸易壁垒定性、定量研究上积累了不少成果，但研究对象的复杂性导致研究的准确程度还有待提高，与关税壁垒相对成熟的研究相比，国外技术性贸易壁垒研究有待进一步深化。
二、国内研究现状20 世纪90 年代初期，随着技术性贸易壁垒问题的凸现，国内学者开始对技术性贸易壁垒问题进行研究，最初的研究主要集中在对GATT 的标准守则、TBT 概念、来源及发达国家TBT 概况等做框架性的分析与描述。
进入21 世纪，中国加入世界贸易组织后，技术性贸易壁垒日益成为中国对外贸易的重要问题，大量文献开始涌现。
徐璐（2015）从标准化角度分析了技术性贸易壁垒问题，对标准守则的形成、技术性贸易壁垒的概念与基本内容做出了框架性的分析。
高戈（2015）研究认为，在技术性贸易壁垒现象的影响下传统的电子产品产业出口模式已经无法满足当代社会的发展需求，因而在此背景下为了推动对外贸易的快速发展，要求各大贸易企业在发展的过程中应依据自身发展现状来不断完善自身经营中的技术性贸易壁垒预警机制，以此来避免贸易风险的产生影响到贸易活动的有序开展；从技术性贸易壁垒对中国电子产品出口的突出影响分析入手，并详细阐述了应对技术性贸易壁垒的策略，旨在其能推动当前贸易活动的有序开展。
技术性贸易壁垒分析论文一、什么是技术性贸易壁垒技术性贸易壁垒是非关税壁垒的一个组成部分。
通常是指一国或以维护GJ安全、保护人类、动植物生命及健康、阻止欺诈、保护环境、保证产品质量为目的，或以贸易保护为目的所采取的种种技术性限制措施。
这些措施若标准过高，超出了实际需要；或者在制定技术规格时带有偏见，不合理地优待本国产品或某些特定来源的进口产品时，则会变成不合理的贸易壁垒，在主观或客观上成为自由贸易的障碍。
随着经济全球化的迅猛进展，国际贸易中的关税壁垒正被逐步取消，传统的非关税壁垒活动空间也日益缩小，以人类健康、生态环境保护、消费者权益保护面貌出现的技术性贸易保护主义逐渐抬头。
世界贸易组织的《技术性贸易壁垒协议》（greementonTechniclBrrierstoTrde简称TBT协议）也积极鼓舞协议的各参加国制订技术法规和标准，并推行评审制度，来推动技术进步和产品质量的提高，从而出现了国际贸易中商品的进出由价格、关税调节变成了由技术指标或技术指数或法律、法规来调节的趋向。
作为世界最大的进展ZG家和第九大出口贸易国，我国出口正面临着越来越多的技术性贸易壁垒。
二、发达GJ对我国出口商品实施技术性贸易壁垒的具体表现我国目前对美国、日本、欧盟等国的出口占我出口总额的47.8%。
由于这些GJ科技发达、技术水平高，客观上对我出口产品形成技术性贸易壁垒压力。
实际上，早在1980年，美国食品与药品治理局(FD)就开始限制和禁止我国中草药进口，而进入90年代后，发达GJ对我出口实施技术性贸易壁垒更是愈演愈烈，主要表现为：1.涉及出口商品品种多、范围广。
我国的出口商品中，不论是传统的农产品、纺织品、玩具，还是新近开发的高新技术产品，都不同程度、不同内容地面临着技术性贸易壁垒，且技术性贸易壁垒已从原来的商品流通领域扩大到生产、加工领域。
现在越来越多的GJ意识到，应从商品生产的全过程来操纵质量，防止污染，有效利用资源，要加强生产过程的质量操纵、环境保护与认证工作，所以要求进口商品的生产加工方法也必须符合本国的有关法规和标准，以保护本国的相关产业。
技术性贸易壁垒文献综述及外文文献资料本份文档包含：关于该选题的外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献标题: THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILE 作者: Shah M.期刊: Pakistan Journal of Science, 卷: 66；期: 2；页:130-137；年份: 2021THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILEINDUSTRYABSTRACT: During the last three decades, trade barriers have been drastically reduced under obligations of WTO. Due to freedom in trade, competition has increased, forcing industries to improve their productivity to compete in this free market. However there are still some trade barriers which are used to block market access. Technical Barrier to Trade (TBT) is one of such barriers. In this study the impact of TBT on export performance of Pakistan textile industry has been empirically evaluated. A model was framed which represented TBT and export performance as variables. Primary data was collected from top textile firms of Pakistan. Multiple regression analysis was applied on the primary data. Results indicated that TBT has positively affected the performance of Pakistan textile industry.Keywords: WTO, TBT, export performance, textile industry, Pakistan. INTRODUCTIONTrade liberalization is considered as catalyst which stimulates economic activity in a progressive economy. It opens up market economy to flourish and prosper. In poor countries, trade liberalization improves the economy and helps reduce poverty (Dollar and Kraay, 2001, World Bank Report, 1987). Contrary to this, there are studies which indicate that there is not enough evidence to support relationship between economic growth and trade liberalization (Grossman and Helpman, 1991, Rodriguez, and Rodrik, 2000).The conviction that an outward looking trade policy is better than an inward-lookingor shelter view^ias been enthusiastically discussed in the economic enhancement literature(Krueger, 1978, Dollar, 1992, Sachs and Warner, 1995). Whereas the belief that exports are good for economic development is well established, but the ways to export production have been challenged in thetrade and industry literature. The experience of East Asian countries has revealed that the route to export production is certainly via importsubstitution (Amsden, 1989, Wade, 1990), Ocampo and Taylor, 1998).During 1990-2021, trade liberalization was an obligation for Pakistan.This opening of trade was largely enforced by the IMF and World Bank during structural adjustment srogram (Kardar, 1997).Pakistan is a developing economy and her major source of revenue is from services and agriculture. The contribution of production, construction, retail trade services and wholesale, in Pakistan's GDP, has gone down gradually (Weisbrot and Baker, 2002).Textile forms60% of Pakistan's total exports. It has faced market access challenges due to discriminating trade barriers by developed countries. For developing countries, main hindrance to market access is non tariff measures (NTM) which include TBT. Open trade is supposed to help greater market access by reducing negative market indicators and boosting productivity in the local market and fair distribution of resources. Pakistan has gradually shifted its exports from raw to finished products (Pakistan Economic Survey, 2001). However in case of textile, Pakistan can not appreciably shift its products from primary goods to finished commodities due to low market access because of presence of NTM.In this study, author has analyzed the impact of TBT, which is part of NTM, on productivity of Pakistan textile industry.The research question developed on the basis of arguments in previous section is as follows:How much and to what extent have the trade barriers as TBT, influenced export performance and the productivity of textile industry of Pakistan,during the period 1990 to 2021?The purpose of the study was to evaluate empirically the impact of TBT on the exportperformance and productivity of textile Industry of Pakistan.This study is beneficial for the policy makers of the Government of Pakistan, textile firms operating in Pakistan, research scholars, research organizations, universities as well as foreign research organizations who want to enhance their understanding regarding effects of trade barriers on thetextile industry of Pakistan.TBT refers to different measures which countries use to control the markets, defend their consumers and protect natural resources. However, it may additionally discriminate against imports in favor of domestic products (Geoffrey, 1997). There is persistent fear among small developing countries about the rate at which new and possibly more complex standards and regulations are being introduced into the global markets (Broberg, 2021).Market-driven voluntary standards usually do not threat market access, but failure to observe these standards or technical rules in different national and international laws will result in refusal of merchandise at points of entry by the customs. A certain commodity can sustain positive and negative impacts by standards and regulations through labeling and packaging laws, the food safety rules and the inspection and certification rules. Those countries which are allowed a duty-free access to the European market, cannot guarantee their permanent presence in this market, as they can be blocked by some technical requirements. TBTs result in enhanced cost for exporter in market access. Even inside the European Union, around 10% of overall expenditurefalls on merchandise from different European Union countries.Local regulations and standards can present multiple barriers to trade depending upon their aim and also the structural amendments and behavioral responses. MATERIALS AND METHODSIn this study, author formulated a mathematical research model to represent association of TBT with the export performance of the textile industry of Pakistan. Primary data was collected by means of a structured questionnaire. Author developed a questionnaire that comprised of questions which were adopted from the research studies of (Pricewaterhouse, 2001, MAIA and IFM, 2021).Questionnaire included two parts. First part asked respondents questions about demographics of the firm andsecond part asked respondents questions about the variables of the study.We collected primary data from selected textile firms based on their export revenue. The top 50 export oriented textile firms, operating in Pakistan, were selected from Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) dataand sent questionnaire to all of these firms. The mathematical model of the study was tested by the application of multiple regression analyses.The research model of the study comprised of two variables (oneIndependent Variable - IV and one Dependent Variable - DV) which are represented in the model presented below as Figure-1:Mathematical Model of the Study: The mathematical model of the study is as follows: EP^sub rexIn, t^ = α^sub o^ + β^sub 1^ TBT^sub Texin, t^ T η^sub Texin, t^ Where, symbolic expressions in above mathematical model have the following meanings:EPrexin, t = Export Performance (EP) of the textile industry in the time't'TBTTexin, t = Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) related to the textile industry in the time 't'a0 = Model Constantβ1= It is the coefficient of the independent variable included in the model STexin, t = Model error termThis mathematical model was formulated to evaluate the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable in the textile industry of Pakistan. This model has been tested by applying multiple regression analyses on the collected data by using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe reliability of the instrument was checked by applying Cronbach's alpha which resulted in a score of .856 and validity of the instrument was assessed by applying factor analyses which showed values of all the items of the instrument greater than the 0.50 cutoff value.In this study Confirmatory Factor Analysis has been employed to access the construct validity of the research instrument of (Hafiz andShaari2021, Hair et. al. 2021) thatvalidity is a measure that correctly defines the concept of the study. Moreover, (Hair et. al. 1995) reported that the factor loadings must begreater than 0.5 cutoff value. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the constructs of the study has been presented in table 1 below:Table 2 shows that TBT was taken as single independent variable and EP as single dependent variable. Beta coefficient (?=.198) for TBT was positive and significant as p-value (0.024<0.05). Value of standard error (error=.077) forTBT was lower which confirmed increase level of predictability of TBT used as independent variables in the study. The t-value (t=2.561) for TBT was significantly higher, which confirmed higher level of association between TBT and EP of textile firms taken as sample. Lower p-value (0.024<0.05) resulted in the acceptance of the hypothesis of the study and established that the TBT during period 1990 to 2021 had positively affected the EP of Pakistan'stextile industry. TBT as independent variable has explained 33.5% variance in EP taken as dependent variable in the study. Moreover, F statistics (F=6.557) was significant for p-value (0.024<0.05) which showed higher strength of the research model. Hence, the regression results showed that there was a significant level of relationship between TBT with EP variable. Here, in the case of Pakistan, TBT had positively impacted the export performance of Pakistan's textile industry.TBT consists of three fields as, technical rules, standards, and conformity procedures. The ordinary principals and rules that are appropriate, were, non discrimination (Most Favored Nation and National Treatment), the avoidance of unwanted obstacles to international trade, harmonization, use of international standards, equivalence and mutual recognition, and transparency. Harmonization was basically the back bone of TBT. It was required that members actively participate in the making of standards. They also implement the international standards as the foundation for international standards and rules. In addition to that they also ought to prepare guide and proposals for conformity assessment procedures. It was mandatory for the members to publish or create obtainable technical rules, standards, and conformity assessment procedures to differentiate other members.Obligatory standards and technical rules plus international standards were vital factors感谢您的阅读，祝您生活愉快。
对于技术性贸易壁垒研究文件的综述摘要技术性贸易壁垒是今世国际贸易理论与政策研究的前沿课题，为从根本上理清技术性贸易壁垒的本质，有必需对其理论研究的发展脉络做一梳理。
本文从技术性贸易壁垒的观点及性质界定、形成体制、自由化方面对技术性贸易壁垒的有关文件进行了逐个梳理与剖析，试图成立起一个有关技术性贸易壁垒的剖析框架。
重点词：技术性贸易壁垒，两重性质，形成体制，贸易自由化跟着多边贸易系统对关税和传统非关税壁垒的连续成功减少，入口国转向其余新式非关税壁垒作为代替品以保持必定的贸易限制水平，技术性贸易壁垒因其名义上的合理性与形式上的合法性成为目前国际贸易领域中发展最为快速的非关税壁垒之一。
回首重商主义以来的国际贸易保护理论，既有形成贸易保护主流的天真家产论、战后现代贸易保护理论的凯恩斯重商主义，今世贸易保护的新理论战略性贸易政策论，也有其余非主流的贸易保护理论。
如普林维什的中心—外头论，公正贸易论，管理贸易论等。
但不论是哪一种理论，作为贸易保护手段概括起来主假如两种：一种是关税壁垒，一种是非关税壁垒。
作为技术性贸易壁垒，已有的贸易保护理论并无特意阐述。
一、技术性贸易壁垒观点界定经济学界对技术性贸易壁垒的观点界定其实不一致，以致于 Hillman(1991) 以为观点界定的杂乱是有关技术性贸易壁垒经济影响的研究进展迟缓的主要原由之一。
有学者从政策工具属性界定或形式归类的方式来定义技术性贸易壁垒。
比如R.Baldwin 在 1970 年发布的《国际贸易的非关税歪曲》中以为，“技术与管理法例，往常与健康、安全或其余一些重要的公共利益有关，常常成为不用要的贸易阻碍。
”但 Baldwin 仅是对技术性贸易壁垒作为非关税壁垒的一种形式做了简单描绘。
Hillman(1991) 最早以英国的疯牛病引致的英法贸易矛盾为例，提到“国家发现除传统的关税之外的贸易保护工具来限制国际贸易中农产品的流动，这些工具被称为技术壁垒” ，指出技术性贸易壁垒属于非关税壁垒，其形式表现为检疫与卫生法例。
论文：我国面临的技术性贸易壁垒引言随着全球经济一体化的进一步发展，贸易壁垒成为了影响国际贸易发展的重要因素之一。
而技术性贸易壁垒作为一种非关税壁垒形式，在国际贸易中占据着重要地位。
本文旨在分析我国面临的技术性贸易壁垒的现状、产生的原因以及对我国经济发展的影响，并提出一些对策建议。
技术性贸易壁垒的定义和类型技术性贸易壁垒是指贸易各方为保护本国市场或企业利益而采取的技术标准、认证、规定等形式的措施。
技术性贸易壁垒的类型多样，包括标准技术性贸易壁垒、认证技术性贸易壁垒、条码技术性贸易壁垒等。
我国面临的技术性贸易壁垒现状我国作为世界第二大经济体，在国际贸易中面临着各种技术性贸易壁垒的挑战。
一方面，发达国家通过技术标准和认证要求，对我国产品进行限制；另一方面，我国产品在国际市场上遭遇的质量和安全问题也导致一些国家采取了技术性贸易壁垒来保护自身的市场。
技术性贸易壁垒产生的原因技术性贸易壁垒的产生与国家间的经济利益、产业保护、市场准入、技术创新等多个因素有关。
发达国家为了保护本国企业的市场份额和技术优势，通常对进口产品设置更高的技术标准和认证要求。
而一些发展中国家则利用技术性贸易壁垒来限制进口产品，保护本国市场和产业。
技术性贸易壁垒对我国经济发展的影响技术性贸易壁垒对我国经济发展造成了一定的限制和挑战。
首先，技术性贸易壁垒导致我国的出口受限，影响了我国的经济增长和就业机会。
其次，技术性贸易壁垒限制了我国企业的技术创新能力和产品竞争力的提升。
最后，技术性贸易壁垒还可能导致我国企业在国际市场上的声誉受损，影响我国产品的国际竞争力。
应对技术性贸易壁垒的对策建议为了应对技术性贸易壁垒对我国经济的影响，我们可以采取以下对策建议：1.加强技术标准的研究和制定，提升我国产品的技术水平和质量标准。
2.增加对国际认证机构的投入，提高我国产品的国际认可度。
3.加强与其他国家的合作，推动国际贸易规则的变革和改革。
4.鼓励企业加大技术创新投入，提升产品的研发能力和竞争力。
贸易壁垒中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)技术性贸易壁垒的经济效应分析摘要技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)的经济效应是指一国实行的技术性贸易壁垒所产生的各种经济影响,包括对相关国家及本国各利益集团的利益得失及其变动的影响。
TBT对出口国出口贸易的影响主要通过数量抑制和价格抑制两个方面来实现。
在短期内,TBT将会阻碍出口国企业的出口,导致生产者福利的损失;但在中长期内,出口国若能对TBT进行合理的管理和利用,则TBT可能会促使出口国企业的产品与技术创新动力,从而对出口国贸易条件的改善具有促进作用。
关键词: 技术性贸易壁垒;数量抑制;价格抑制;消费者效应;产业效应技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)是指一国或一个区域组织以维护国家或区域基本安全、保障人类健康和安全、保护动植物健康和安全、保护环境、防止欺诈行为、保证产品质量等为由而采取的一些强制性或自愿性的技术性措施,这些措施对其他国家或区域组织的商品、服务和投资进入该国或该区域市场产生影响。
技术性贸易壁垒的经济效应是指一国实行的技术性贸易壁垒所产生的各种经济影响,包括对相关国家及本国各利益集团的利益得失及其变动的影响。
1 TBT的作用机制分析从技术贸易壁垒的作用机制来看,一方面,技术性贸易壁垒具有控制进口商品数量的作用，即数量抑制机制另一方面,技术性贸易壁垒具有控制进口商品价格的作用，即价格抑制机制。
1.1数量抑制效应当技术性要求标准较低时,商品或服务都因达到或超过规定的技术性要求而被允许进口。
但当进口国将进口品技术性要求提高时,商品或服务因为低于技术要求而被拒绝进口。
技术性要求的提高明显构成了对进口品的贸易障碍,产生对进口品的数量控制作用,。
1.2价格抑制效应出口商品或服务的质量由于没能达到进口国的最低标准而未获得进口许可,此时,如果出口企业仍想留在进口市场,就只有通过增加投资对产品或服务进行技术改进,出口企业为保住市场不得不改进技术调整生产或服务过程而付出额外费用使之达到新的要求，这样就导致了该产品或服务的单位成本提高，企业要想获得正常利润必须把价格提高,。
贸易壁垒中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)技术性贸易壁垒的经济效应分析摘要技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)的经济效应是指一国实行的技术性贸易壁垒所产生的各种经济影响,包括对相关国家及本国各利益集团的利益得失及其变动的影响。
TBT对出口国出口贸易的影响主要通过数量抑制和价格抑制两个方面来实现。
在短期内,TBT将会阻碍出口国企业的出口,导致生产者福利的损失;但在中长期内,出口国若能对TBT进行合理的管理和利用,则TBT可能会促使出口国企业的产品与技术创新动力,从而对出口国贸易条件的改善具有促进作用。
关键词: 技术性贸易壁垒;数量抑制;价格抑制;消费者效应;产业效应技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)是指一国或一个区域组织以维护国家或区域基本安全、保障人类健康和安全、保护动植物健康和安全、保护环境、防止欺诈行为、保证产品质量等为由而采取的一些强制性或自愿性的技术性措施,这些措施对其他国家或区域组织的商品、服务和投资进入该国或该区域市场产生影响。
技术性贸易壁垒的经济效应是指一国实行的技术性贸易壁垒所产生的各种经济影响,包括对相关国家及本国各利益集团的利益得失及其变动的影响。
1 TBT的作用机制分析从技术贸易壁垒的作用机制来看,一方面,技术性贸易壁垒具有控制进口商品数量的作用，即数量抑制机制另一方面,技术性贸易壁垒具有控制进口商品价格的作用，即价格抑制机制。
1.1数量抑制效应当技术性要求标准较低时,商品或服务都因达到或超过规定的技术性要求而被允许进口。
但当进口国将进口品技术性要求提高时,商品或服务因为低于技术要求而被拒绝进口。
技术性要求的提高明显构成了对进口品的贸易障碍,产生对进口品的数量控制作用,。
1.2价格抑制效应出口商品或服务的质量由于没能达到进口国的最低标准而未获得进口许可,此时,如果出口企业仍想留在进口市场,就只有通过增加投资对产品或服务进行技术改进,出口企业为保住市场不得不改进技术调整生产或服务过程而付出额外费用使之达到新的要求，这样就导致了该产品或服务的单位成本提高，企业要想获得正常利润必须把价格提高,。
技术性贸易壁垒文献综述及国外文献资料简介本文对技术性贸易壁垒的相关文献进行综述，并提供一些国外文献资料供参考。
技术性贸易壁垒主要指各种与技术相关的措施或要求，用于限制或阻止特定产品或服务的国际贸易。
技术性贸易壁垒可能带来贸易限制和不公平竞争，因此对其进行研究和了解非常重要。
文献综述1. Title: "Technical Barriers to Trade: A Review"Title: "Technical Barriers to Trade: A Review"- Authors: Smith, J., Johnson, L.Authors: Smith, J., Johnson, L.- Published: Journal of International Trade, Vol. 20(2018)Published: Journal of International Trade, Vol. 20 (2018)2. Title: "The Role of Standards in Technical Barriers to Trade"Title: "The Role of Standards in Technical Barriers to Trade"- Authors: Wang, H., Zhang, L.Authors: Wang, H., Zhang, L.- Published: International Journal of Trade Economics, Vol. 25 (2017)Published: International Journal of Trade Economics, Vol. 25 (2017)- Summary: This paper discusses the role of standards in creating technical barriers to trade. It explores how different types of standards, such as product standards and testing requirements, affect international trade. The paper also analyzes the impact of standard harmonization efforts on reducing technical barriers.Summary: This paper discusses the role of standards in creating technical barriers to trade. It explores how different types of standards, such as product standards and testing requirements, affect international trade. The paper also analyzes the impact of standard harmonization efforts on reducing technical barriers.3. Title: "Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade on Developing Countries"Title: "Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade on Developing Countries"- Authors: Lopez, M., Garcia, R.Authors: Lopez, M., Garcia, R.- Published: Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 30 (2016)Published: Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 30 (2016)国外文献资料- 这篇研究对比了不同国家之间的技术性贸易壁垒情况，从而揭示了其对国际贸易的影响。
《技术性贸易壁垒研究》篇一一、引言随着全球化的深入发展，贸易自由化成为各国经济发展的重要方向。
然而，在国际贸易中，技术性贸易壁垒作为一种重要的非关税壁垒，已经成为影响国际贸易发展的重要因素。
技术性贸易壁垒涉及诸多领域，包括技术法规、技术标准、认证制度、检验检疫等，其影响深远且复杂。
因此，对技术性贸易壁垒进行研究，有助于理解其影响，进而寻求有效的应对策略。
二、技术性贸易壁垒的概述技术性贸易壁垒是指在国际贸易中，进口国为维护国家安全、保障人民健康、保护环境、维护产品质量和安全等目的而采取的一系列技术性措施。
这些措施可能对其他国家的出口产品构成限制或禁止，从而影响国际贸易的正常进行。
三、技术性贸易壁垒的类型与特点技术性贸易壁垒主要包括技术法规、技术标准、合格评定程序、检验检疫等类型。
这些壁垒具有隐蔽性强、形式多样、影响广泛等特点。
它们不仅可能对某一类商品构成限制，还可能对整个国家的出口产业造成严重影响。
四、技术性贸易壁垒的影响技术性贸易壁垒对国际贸易的影响是多方面的。
首先，它可能增加出口企业的成本，如需要满足进口国的标准而产生的额外费用。
其次，它可能降低出口产品的竞争力，使出口国在国际贸易中的地位受到挑战。
此外，技术性贸易壁垒还可能引发贸易争端和冲突，影响国家间的经济关系。
五、应对技术性贸易壁垒的策略面对技术性贸易壁垒，各国应采取有效的应对策略。
首先，加强国际合作与交流，共同应对技术性贸易壁垒带来的挑战。
其次，积极推进技术创新和产业升级，提高出口产品的质量和竞争力。
此外，建立健全的技术法规和标准体系，加强合格评定和检验检疫工作也是必要的措施。
同时，企业应加强自身建设，提高应对技术性贸易壁垒的能力。
六、案例分析以某国对进口产品的环保要求为例，该国对进口产品的环保标准有严格的要求，许多外国产品因未能达到其标准而被禁止进口。
针对这一情况，进口国企业应积极了解并适应这一要求，提高产品的环保性能和质量。
同时，政府应加强与该国的沟通与协调，共同探讨解决措施，以促进两国的贸易发展。
《技术性贸易壁垒研究》篇一一、引言随着全球化的深入发展，贸易自由化进程不断加快，技术性贸易壁垒逐渐成为国际贸易中的一大挑战。
技术性贸易壁垒主要是指通过强制执行某一国家或地区的技术规范、技术标准等，使得外国商品难以满足进口国的需求，进而对贸易产生影响的一种非关税贸易壁垒。
此类壁垒涉及到商品的技术性要求、安全标准、质量认证等多个方面，对国际贸易产生了深远的影响。
本文旨在深入探讨技术性贸易壁垒的成因、影响及应对策略。
二、技术性贸易壁垒的成因技术性贸易壁垒的形成原因复杂多样，主要包括以下几个方面：1. 技术差异：不同国家的技术发展水平存在差异，导致对产品技术标准、安全标准等的要求不同。
2. 保护主义：某些国家为保护本国产业和就业，通过设置技术性贸易壁垒限制外国商品的进口。
3. 法规制度：各国法规制度的不统一，使得外国商品在进口过程中需要满足多种不同的标准和规定。
4. 认证和检验程序：某些国家要求进口商品必须经过严格的质量认证和检验程序，增加了贸易成本和难度。
三、技术性贸易壁垒的影响技术性贸易壁垒对国际贸易产生了显著的影响，主要表现在以下几个方面：1. 增加贸易成本：技术性贸易壁垒要求外国商品在进口过程中进行额外的认证、检验等程序，增加了贸易成本。
2. 限制贸易量：由于不同国家的技术标准、安全标准等存在差异，使得外国商品难以满足进口国的要求，从而限制了贸易量。
3. 加剧国际贸易摩擦：技术性贸易壁垒往往容易引起贸易争端和摩擦，影响国家间的经济关系。
4. 促进技术创新：技术性贸易壁垒也能推动企业加强技术创新和研发，提高产品的质量和竞争力。
四、应对技术性贸易壁垒的策略为应对技术性贸易壁垒，需要采取多种策略：1. 加强国际合作与交流：各国应加强在技术标准、安全标准等方面的国际合作与交流，推动制定统一的标准和规定。
2. 提高技术水平与产品质量：企业应加强技术创新和研发，提高产品的技术和质量水平，以满足进口国的要求。
《技术性贸易壁垒国内研究综述》摘要：近年来，我国农产品出口已成为遭受国外技术性贸易壁垒最多的领域，涉及的产品种类多，企业多，造成的损失大，众多学者已对技术性贸易壁垒对我国农产品贸易的影响进行了定性或定量的研究，朱玉春、种胜兵（2007）对我国农产品遭遇技术性贸易壁垒的原因进行了量化研究，指出人均GNP、农业GDP比重、农业人均GDP、农业人口比重等因素具有重要影响，此外，还有程国强（2005）、黄冠胜（2007）、王绍媛（2010）、刘汉成（2010）等众多学者都对农产品技术性贸易壁垒的特点以及对我国农产品进出口贸易的影响进行了分析，并提出了应对的政策选择内容摘要：技术性贸易壁垒已成为当前国际贸易领域理论与政策研究的重要课题。
本文从技术性贸易壁垒的内涵及表现形式、形成机制、经济效应、应对策略及其对我国农产品出口的影响等方面对国内近年来对技术性贸易壁垒的研究进行梳理总结。
关键词：技术性贸易壁垒内涵形成机制经济效应应对策略上世纪90年代以来，在关税壁垒和配额、反补贴、反倾销等传统非关税壁垒措施受到WTO严格限制的情况下，以保护人类和动植物健康及环境资源为名的技术性贸易壁垒因其具有的针对性强、隐蔽性好、运用灵活等特性正逐步取代关税和传统非关税壁垒，成为各国特别是发达国家进行贸易保护的主要政策工具和手段，对国际贸易产生着深远的影响。
由技术性贸易壁垒而引发的贸易纠纷已成为国际贸易领域一个新的焦点，并对我国对外贸易产生重要影响。
国内关于技术性贸易壁垒的研究前期较多集中于对WTO-TBT/SPS协议内容的翻译、简单剖析及对国外技术性贸易壁垒的简单介绍。
近年来，随着技术性贸易壁垒对我国对外贸易的负面影响日益显现，研究的视角也逐渐拓展，已从对概念界定、措施方法、表现形式等的介绍深入到对其形成机制、经济社会效应及应对策略等方面的研究。
关于技术性贸易壁垒内涵及表现形式的研究叶柏林（1990）较早对技术性贸易壁垒的发展趋势有了深刻认识，指出它己替代传统的关税、数量限制及其他非关税壁垒，成为保护国内产业和市场的最主要的贸易壁垒。
技术性贸易壁垒研究随着全球化的深入发展，国际贸易自由化成为推动世界经济的重要手段。
然而，技术性贸易壁垒（Technical Barriers to Trade，简称TBT）却成为各国之间进行贸易往来的重要障碍。
本文将对技术性贸易壁垒的相关问题进行深入探讨，旨在为政府和企业提供有价值的参考，以促进国际贸易的可持续发展。
一、技术性贸易壁垒的定义与影响技术性贸易壁垒是指一国政府采取的以技术为手段，以保护国家安全、人类健康和生态环境为名，通过设立严格的技术规范、标准和认证程序等措施，限制外国商品和服务进口的贸易保护主义政策。
技术性贸易壁垒具有以下特征：1、以技术为手段：技术性贸易壁垒借助技术法规、标准、认证程序等手段，限制外国商品和服务进口。
2、合理性：技术性贸易壁垒通常以保护国家安全、人类健康和生态环境为名，具有一定的合理性。
3、隐蔽性：技术性贸易壁垒不易被察觉，往往以技术细节为由，对外国商品和服务进行限制。
技术性贸易壁垒对国际贸易的影响主要表现在以下几个方面：1、阻碍商品和服务流通：技术性贸易壁垒通过设立严格的技术规范、标准和认证程序等措施，限制外国商品和服务进口，阻碍了商品和服务的流通。
2、增加企业成本：企业为符合进口国的技术性贸易壁垒，需要投入大量人力、物力和财力，增加企业成本。
3、降低出口竞争力：技术性贸易壁垒使得外国商品和服务在进口国市场上处于劣势地位，降低了出口竞争力。
4、引发国际贸易摩擦：由于技术性贸易壁垒的不透明性和差异性，容易引发国际贸易摩擦。
二、应对技术性贸易壁垒的策略为了应对技术性贸易壁垒带来的影响，政府和企业可以采取以下策略：1、加快科技创新：提高企业技术水平，推动科技创新，研发符合国际标准的产品和服务，从根本上提高出口竞争力。
2、推进标准化进程：积极参与国际标准制定和修订，将本国标准融入国际标准，降低国外技术性贸易壁垒的影响。
3、加强检验检测：建立完善的检验检测体系，提高企业质量控制水平，确保产品和服务符合进口国的技术要求。
本份文档包含：关于该选题的外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献标题: THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILE作者: Shah M.期刊: Pakistan Journal of Science, 卷: 66；期: 2；页:130-137；年份: 2014THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILEINDUSTRYABSTRACT: During the last three decades, trade barriers have been drastically reduced under obligations of WTO. Due to freedom in trade, competition has increased, forcing industries to improve their productivity to compete in this free market. However there are still some trade barriers which are used to block market access. Technical Barrier to Trade (TBT) is one of such barriers. In this study the impact of TBT on export performance of Pakistan textile industry has been empirically evaluated. A model was framed which represented TBT and export performance as variables. Primary data was collected from top textile firms of Pakistan. Multiple regression analysis was applied on the primary data. Results indicated that TBT has positively affected the performance of Pakistan textile industry.Keywords: WTO, TBT, export performance, textile industry, Pakistan. INTRODUCTIONTrade liberalization is considered as catalyst which stimulates economic activity in a progressive economy. It opens up market economy to flourish and prosper. In poor countries, trade liberalization improves the economy and helps reduce poverty (Dollar and Kraay, 2001, World Bank Report, 1987). Contrary to this, there are studies which indicate that there is not enough evidence to support relationship between economic growth and trade liberalization (Grossman and Helpman, 1991, Rodriguez, and Rodrik, 2000).The conviction that an outward looking trade policy is better than an inward-lookingor shelter view^ias been enthusiastically discussed in the economic enhancement literature(Krueger, 1978, Dollar, 1992, Sachs and Warner, 1995). Whereas the belief that exports are good for economic development is well established, but the ways to export production have been challenged in the trade and industry literature. The experience of East Asian countries has revealed that the route to export production is certainly via import substitution (Amsden, 1989, Wade, 1990), Ocampo and Taylor, 1998).During 1990-2005, trade liberalization was an obligation for Pakistan. This opening of trade was largely enforced by the IMF and World Bank during structural adjustment srogram (Kardar, 1997).Pakistan is a developing economy and her major source of revenue is from services and agriculture. The contribution of production, construction, retail trade services and wholesale, in Pakistan's GDP, has gone down gradually (Weisbrot and Baker, 2002).Textile forms60% of Pakistan's total exports. It has faced market access challenges due to discriminating trade barriers by developed countries. For developing countries, main hindrance to market access is non tariff measures (NTM) which include TBT. Open trade is supposed to help greater market access by reducing negative market indicators and boosting productivity in the local market and fair distribution of resources. Pakistan has gradually shifted its exports from raw to finished products (Pakistan Economic Survey, 2001). However in case of textile, Pakistan can not appreciably shift its products from primary goods to finished commodities due to low market access because of presence of NTM.In this study, author has analyzed the impact of TBT, which is part of NTM, on productivity of Pakistan textile industry.The research question developed on the basis of arguments in previous section is as follows:How much and to what extent have the trade barriers as TBT, influenced export performance and the productivity of textile industry of Pakistan, during the period 1990 to 2005?The purpose of the study was to evaluate empirically the impact of TBT on the exportperformance and productivity of textile Industry of Pakistan.This study is beneficial for the policy makers of the Government of Pakistan, textile firms operating in Pakistan, research scholars, research organizations, universities as well as foreign research organizations who want to enhance their understanding regarding effects of trade barriers on the textile industry of Pakistan.TBT refers to different measures which countries use to control the markets, defend their consumers and protect natural resources. However, it may additionally discriminate against imports in favor of domestic products (Geoffrey, 1997). There is persistent fear among small developing countries about the rate at which new and possibly more complex standards and regulations are being introduced into the global markets (Broberg, 2009).Market-driven voluntary standards usually do not threat market access, but failure to observe these standards or technical rules in different national and international laws will result in refusal of merchandise at points of entry by the customs. A certain commodity can sustain positive and negative impacts by standards and regulations through labeling and packaging laws, the food safety rules and the inspection and certification rules. Those countries which are allowed a duty-free access to the European market, cannot guarantee their permanent presence in this market, as they can be blocked by some technical requirements. TBTs result in enhanced cost for exporter in market access. Even inside the European Union, around 10% of overall expenditure falls on merchandise from different European Union countries.Local regulations and standards can present multiple barriers to trade depending upon their aim and also the structural amendments and behavioral responses. MATERIALS AND METHODSIn this study, author formulated a mathematical research model to represent association of TBT with the export performance of the textile industry of Pakistan. Primary data was collected by means of a structured questionnaire. Author developed a questionnaire that comprised of questions which were adopted from the research studies of (Pricewaterhouse, 2001, MAIA and IFM, 2004).Questionnaire included two parts. First part asked respondents questions about demographics of the firm andsecond part asked respondents questions about the variables of the study.We collected primary data from selected textile firms based on their export revenue. The top 50 export oriented textile firms, operating in Pakistan, were selected from Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) dataand sent questionnaire to all of these firms. The mathematical model of the study was tested by the application of multiple regression analyses.The research model of the study comprised of two variables (one Independent Variable - IV and one Dependent Variable - DV) which are represented in the model presented below as Figure-1:Mathematical Model of the Study: The mathematical model of the study is as follows: EP^sub rexIn, t^ = α^sub o^ + β^sub 1^ TBT^sub Texin, t^ T η^sub Texin, t^ Where, symbolic expressions in above mathematical model have the following meanings:EPrexin, t = Export Performance (EP) of the textile industry in the time 't' TBTTexin, t = Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) related to the textile industry in the time 't'a0 = Model Constantβ1= It is the coefficient of the independent variable included in the modelSTexin, t = Model error termThis mathematical model was formulated to evaluate the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable in the textile industry of Pakistan. This model has been tested by applying multiple regression analyses on the collected data by using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS).RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe reliability of the instrument was checked by applying Cronbach's alpha which resulted in a score of .856 and validity of the instrument was assessed by applying factor analyses which showed values of all the items of the instrument greater than the 0.50 cutoff value.In this study Confirmatory Factor Analysis has been employed to access the construct validity of the research instrument of (Hafiz andShaari2013, Hair et. al. 2010) thatvalidity is a measure that correctly defines the concept of the study. Moreover, (Hair et. al. 1995) reported that the factor loadings must be greater than 0.5 cutoff value. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the constructs of the study has been presented in table 1 below:Table 2 shows that TBT was taken as single independent variable and EP as single dependent variable. Beta coefficient (ß=.198) for TBT was positive and significant as p-value (0.024<0.05). Value of standard error (error=.077) for TBT was lower which confirmed increase level of predictability of TBT used as independent variables in the study. The t-value (t=2.561) for TBT was significantly higher, which confirmed higher level of association between TBT and EP of textile firms taken as sample. Lower p-value (0.024<0.05) resulted in the acceptance of the hypothesis of the study and established that the TBT during period 1990 to 2005 had positively affected the EP of Pakistan's textile industry. TBT as independent variable has explained 33.5% variance in EP taken as dependent variable in the study. Moreover, F statistics (F=6.557) was significant for p-value (0.024<0.05) which showed higher strength of the research model. Hence, the regression results showed that there was a significant level of relationship between TBT with EP variable. Here, in the case of Pakistan, TBT had positively impacted the export performance of Pakistan's textile industry.TBT consists of three fields as, technical rules, standards, and conformity procedures. The ordinary principals and rules that are appropriate, were, non discrimination (Most Favored Nation and National Treatment), the avoidance of unwanted obstacles to international trade, harmonization, use of international standards, equivalence and mutual recognition, and transparency. Harmonization was basically the back bone of TBT. It was required that members actively participate in the making of standards. They also implement the international standards as the foundation for international standards and rules. In addition to that they also ought to prepare guide and proposals for conformity assessment procedures. It was mandatory for the members to publish or create obtainable technical rules, standards, and conformity assessment procedures to differentiate other members.Obligatory standards and technical rules plus international standards were vital factorsthat had an effect on domestic sales and therefore the ability to export. Production and investment costs had a tendency to be higher for companies that face technical regulations, and therefore the investment for conformity was usually up to 10% of the entire investment expenditure. At firm level, the restricted access to credits and low demand were the foremost crucial obstruction to business among each exporting and non-exporting company. Product quality and presence of excessive demand were major factors to enhance the ability to export. Technical regulations and standards had an effect on trade in many ways: assisting exchange by defining product features and improving compatibility and utility, enhance domestic social aims like implementing standards and safety needs, public health and enhance protectionist policies.It was compulsory for the members to make sure that technical rules and standards do not limit trade. However it was arguable that domestic regulations were a form of protectionism. Developing countries argued that they have a very little influence in the formulation of the standards and that the developed countries mostly have the say which give them an unfair advantage. This was also referred as techno-imperialism. TBT is being used as a barrier to imports. The developing countries face problems to invest in domestic economy to improve it to satisfy the international and national standards of developed countries, because they have less technical know-how and lack of assessing and standardizing laboratories. Resultantly they are denied market access. To overcome this, the exporting firms have to increase their efficiency by conforming to international standards.The positive impact of trade barriers on export performance of textile industry of Pakistan is in line with the study of (Weisbrot and Baker, 2002). It reported that TBT had a positive impact on the productivity and export performance of textile industry of Pakistan.Conclusion: Considering Table-2, the study has established positive impact of TBTon the export performance of the textile industry of Pakistan during period 1990 to 2005.二、文献综述技术性贸易壁垒国内研究综述摘要技术性贸易壁垒已成为当前国际贸易领域理论与政策研究的重要课题。
