Traffic congestion and congestion pricing
- 格式:doc
- 大小:59.50 KB
- 文档页数:7
职称英语历年真题《综合C》概括大意题职称英语历年真题《综合C》概括大意精选题2017年职称英语考试复习已经开始,为了促进大家的学习积极性,下面是yjbys网店铺提供给大家关于职称英语历年真题《综合C》概括大意精选题,希望对大家的备考有所帮助。
Traffic Jams -- No End in Sight(1) Traffic congestion (拥堵) affects people throughout the world. Traffic jams cause smog in dozens of cities across both the developed and developing world. In the U. S., commuters (通勤人员) spend an average of a full working week each year sitting in traffic jams, according to the Texas Transportation Institute. While alternative ways of getting around are available, most people still choose their cars because they are looking for convenience, comfort and privacy.(2) The most promising technique for reducing city traffic is called congestion pricing, whereby cities charge a toll to enter certain parts of town at certain times of day. In theory, if the toll is high enough, some drivers will cancel their trips or go by bus or train. And in practice it seems to work: Singapore, London and Stockholm have reduced traffic and pollution in city centres thanks to congestion pricing.(3)Another way to reduce rush-hour traffic is for employers to implement flextime, which lets employees travel to and from work at off-peak traffic times to avoid the rush hour. Those who have to travel during busy times can do their part by sharing cars. Employers can also allow more staff to telecommute (work from home) so as to keep more cars off the road altogether.(4)Some urban planners still believe that the best way to ease traffic congestion is to build more roads, especially roads that cantake drivers around or over crowded city streets. But such techniques do not really keep cars off the road; they only accommodate more of them.(5)Other, more forward-thinking, planners know that more and more drivers and cars are taking to the roads every day, and they are unwilling to encourage more private automobiles when public transport is so much better both for people and the environment. For this reason, the American government has decided to spend some $7 billion on helping to increase capacity on public-transport systemsand upgrade them with moreefficient technologies.But environmentalists complain that such funding is tiny compared with the $50 billion being spent on roads and bridges.23. Paragraph 1 __________24. Paragraph 2__________25. Paragraph 3 __________26. Paragraph 4 __________A. Paying to get inB. Changing work practiceC. Not doing enoughD. A solution which is no solutionE. Closing city centres to trafficF. A global problem27. Most American drivers think it convenient to __________.28. If charged high enough, some drivers may enter certain parts of town __________.29. Building more roads is not an effective way to __________.30. The U. S. government has planned to __________ updating public-transport systems.A. reduce traffic jamsB. drive aroundC. go by busD. spend more moneyE. travel regularlyF. encourage more private cars答案与解析23.F。
T R N E W S 263 J U L Y –A U G U S T 20094The author is a Principal with Cambridge Systematics, Inc.,Cambridge, Massa -chusetts. He is a member of the National Research Council–appointed Committee on Equity Implications of Alternative T rans -portation FinanceMechanisms and of the TRB Congestion Pricing Committee.Tolls have financed highway infrastructure since the Roman Empire. Although toll revenue often may be used for other pur-poses, many believe that financing high-way infrastructure is the main function of tolls. T olls for congestion pricing are different. They generate revenue, but with the intent of changing travel behav-ior to make more efficient use of the transportation system, by shifting some drivers to less congested periods, or to other modes, routes, or shared-ride vehicles, so that the traffic flows more freely .Most products and services supplied in the mar-ketplace rely on pricing to align demand with sup-ply . If demand exceeds supply , prices will rise, and some customers will choose not to buy . Highways,however, are not priced this way , and the prices on the few facilities that are tolled are seldom allowed to vary according to changes in demand.Motivations for Congestion PricingFrom the beginning of automobile travel, the U.S.system of paying for highways has relied largely on motor fuel taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, and tolls.Motorists have grown accustomed to these methods of paying for the cost of building, maintaining, and operating highways. A system that sets a price for highway use as a way of reducing congestion would be a major change, potentially affecting where peo-ple live and work, locate businesses, and socialize. Until recently , the congestion pricing of high-ways mostly had been an academic concept,because the necessary technology did not exist.Recent advances in electronic toll collection, how-ever, have prompted greater interest in congestion pricing. Yet when the topic is discussed in public policy arenas—from state legislatures and gover-nors’ offices to the radio and blogs—the motiva-tions often differ from the efficiency concerns that interest academics.Reducing congestion during peak periods and improving travel time reliability are important moti-Congestion Pricing BasicsJ E F F R E Y N . B U X B A U MPricing Road Use to Address CongestionMinnesota’s I-394 uses electronic toll collection on its high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes.P HOTO : D AVID G ONZALEZ , M N /DOTvations, but so are encouraging transit use, reduc-ing vehicle emissions and energy consumption, and especially providing a funding source for trans-portation programs and projects. Some may view a system of congestion pricing as a means of chang-ing urban form and promoting regional economic development.Pricing Signals and Congestion According to basic microeconomic theory, the demand for a good is directly responsive to the price of the good. If the supply of a good is fixed, the prices can be raised when demand peaks. Examples of time-based pricing include airline tickets on hol-iday weekends, daytime cell phone use, and midday electricity use. In each case, customers who cause the peak congestion must pay a premium, while users who are willing to purchase at off-peak times—when the resource is less scarce—pay less.Moreover, the higher prices signal that addi-tional investment in production capacity may be profitable. An airline will raise prices on a popular route to manage demand for the limited number of seats, but at some point the airline may decide that adding another flight to the route would be prof-itable. Some proponents emphasize that a key advantage of congestion pricing is that it would identify places in the transportation system that warrant investments in more capacity.But the mostly private users of roads and the mostly public suppliers of road capacity do not receive pricing signals. State and local governments largely have been responsible for the building and operation of roads in the United States, so that the highway system is perceived as a public good. In an economic sense, no one can be excluded from the use of a public good, and one person’s use of the good does not diminish its value to others.Under conditions of high volume, however; one additional vehicle entering a road system may cause the flow of traffic to slow, creating congestion and delay for others—so that highways are not strictly public goods. When there is no charge for entry, motorists do not consider that they are imposing a cost on others; the resulting market failure is known as congestion.Pricing for Social EfficiencyNobel Laureate William Vickrey advanced the idea of congestion pricing during the 1950s and 1960s. Implementation of his ideas was impractical, how-ever, because of the primitive nature of toll collec-tion. By the 1990s, tolls could be collected electronically without stopping vehicles, and sev-eral toll roads operated without tollbooths. These technological develop-ments renewed interestin road congestion pric-ing.Technology was notthe only impediment tocongestion pricing, how -ever. Changing the sta-tus quo of highwayfunding and use wouldcreate winners andlosers. Vickrey had recognized that this would needto be addressed if congestion pricing were to beimplemented.Although congestion pricing can produce aneconomically efficient solution to road conges-tion—so that society as a whole gets the most valueout of its expenditures—travelers may be madeworse off on average if the revenues are not used toincrease mobility. Consider these examples:Some motorists will choose to pay the con-gestion charge and continue to use the same roadat the same time as before. They will pay more as aconsequence. These motorists place a high value ontime, and some will be better off because of thetravel time savings. Because all motorists pay thecharge by choice, all presumably are better off doingthis than taking advantage of other options, such asdriving at a different time or on a different route,taking transit, or forgoing the trip altogether. Onnet, however, many still will be worse off than theywere before congestion pricing.Those who choose an alternative road ormode or who cancel the trip are worse off, becausethey are not traveling when, where, or how theywant.Those who were using other routes or modesbefore may be worse off, because new travelers nowmay be competing with them for the capacity. Ifcongestion pricing increases the throughput of thepriced highway, however, congestion on otherroutes and modes may be reduced. Only a detailedanalysis can reveal the traffic impacts.The distribution of winners and losers, andwhether society as a whole is better off with con-gestion pricing, will depend on several factors,including who pays the tolls, the net effect on travelconditions, how the revenue is spent, and changesin other areas of concern, such as fuel consumption,emissions reduction, and safety.The current system of financing highwaysthrough fuel taxes and vehicle fees creates its ownwinners and losers, but the social fabric has beenPHOTO: JOEPINEIRO, COLUMBIAUNIVERSITYARCHIVESWilliam Vickrey, a NobelLaureate, advanced theidea of congestionpricing.TR NEWS 263 JULY–AUGUST 20095T R N E W S 263 J U L Y –A U G U S T 20096built around this system. The transition from one system to another will be disruptive, with the out-comes dependent on how the revenues from con-gestion pricing are used.Getting Prices RightCongestion pricing can be carried out in many ways. One option is to price one or more lanes on a freeway , offering patrons a higher level of service on the tolled lanes. Another option is to price an entire road or collection of roads. A third approach is to establish prices for access to—or travel within—all roads in a specified zone, such as a cor-doned central business district. A fourth is to price the entire roadway system.Congestion pricing on a large scale requires extensive knowledge about congestion levels on all parts of the transportation system simultaneously and an understanding of how each driver’s decision to embark on a trip will affect system congestion.Vickrey pointed out that the decision to travel is made at the beginning of a trip, but the impact of the travel was felt along the entire route and per-sisted after the trip because of the nature of bottle-necks.In theory , under congestion pricing, a highway authority must anticipate economically efficient prices; communicate the prices to travelers, who then decide how to respond; and adjust the prices according to the responses—all in real time. Con-temporary high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes demonstrate how this works—prices are set dynamically , based on the traffic level in the priced lanes, and are changed frequently to maintain opti-mum traffic flow . Extending pricing beyond a sin-gle, limited highway corridor to a longer corridor orto a broader system of priced roadways introduces additional technical and political complexity . Obtaining an economically efficient outcome is only part of the equation. Perceptions of fairness are another, evident in establishing urban transit fares.Transit systems often charge a flat rate, regardless of time of day or of distance traveled. Although some systems—like the Washington, D.C., Metro—charge per distance traveled, with higher prices dur-ing peak hours, most systems have constant rates all day . No system charges higher rates on more con-gested or more popular routes—although the higher rates may be economically efficient. Many travelers would consider this treatment to be unfair by a government-run system.One option that perhaps is more practical than setting a different price for each minute of the day and each road on the system is a simplified system of user charges based on the time of day , type of road, and general location—for example, central business district, suburb, or rural area. After polit-ical compromises, however, the resulting system may not be the most economically efficient but, if done well, still would be more efficient than the sta-tus quo .Effects on the SystemUnless all roads are priced, motorists will have opportunities to shift travel to other parts of the sys-tem to avoid the charges. These motorists will incur the cost of using a less appealing route or mode. In addition, motorists who previously used the alter-nate route may experience the negative effects of higher traffic volumes and possibly more conges-tion. But because freeways carry so much traffic,pricing freeway use may instead have a positive impact on the system—a net win for society . Still,travelers on the priced freeway will be winning at the expense of those who no longer use the facility and of those who now must share the nonpriced roads with the displaced traffic.The extent to which nonpriced roads will expe-rience an increase, a decrease, or no change in con-gestion will depend in part on whether some of the revenue can be used to enhance the roads’ capacity and whether improved operations on the priced facility allow higher throughput. The optimum flow on a highway occurs when vehicles travel at about 45 miles per hour. When demand exceeds a certain point, speeds drop precipitously , allowing less throughput despite higher demand. This paradox is borne out daily in stop-and-go conditions on free-ways. Therefore if pricing can manage demand to maintain optimal travel speeds, throughput mayincrease in other parts of the system.P H O T O : I L L I N O I S T O L L W A YOpen road tolling lanes at the Irving Park Road Toll Plaza on the Tri-State Tollway (I-294) in Illinois.Distributing the Revenue Distribution of public revenue is an age-old politi-cal issue. Concerns about equity and building polit-ical support for the congestion pricing concept may create a strong temptation to use revenues to com-pensate the losers and to spread benefits to favored groups. This may be the only practical way to build support for the concept and still yield a net positive contribution to society.Examples of potential revenue uses include the following:Investing in transit improvements in the affected area;Subsidizing improvements to the nonpriced part of the highway system—for example, to paral-lel arterials;Rebating motor fuel taxes;R educing general taxes, such as income or property taxes;Awarding grants to affected communities; and Allocating toll credits to all drivers, which some may use in full or trade-in any surplus for cash or tax rebates.University of California planners King, Manville, and Shoup have suggested that using congestion pricing revenue to compensate groups may make good sense (1). They argue that those who perceive themselves to be losers from congestion pricing are likely to form a strong political resistance to the concept. The targeted distribution of revenue would allow these groups to perceive themselves as win-ners and give their support to congestion pricing. Gaining Practical ExperienceIf the technology necessary for road pricing had been available at the beginning of the motor vehi-cle era, and if it had been used to capture the full marginal social cost of driving, communities might have developed differently. Urban areas perhaps would be more compact, with greater use of public transportation.But with little real-world expe-rience of congestion pricing,projecting the outcome isdifficult. Most of the pricingexperience in the UnitedStates has involved minoradjustments in tolls on toll facilities and HOT lanes. Lessons from these might not translate well to other types of pricing, such as the zone-based pricing that has been tried overseas in environments much different from those of the United States.The complexity of the technical and political aspects of congestion pricing suggests the need to approach these new ideas with caution, by con-ducting tests and undertaking analyses that are transparent, comprehensive, and methodologically correct. Practitioners also must respect the con-cerns of the affected constituencies.The testing of new congestion pricing ideas con-tinues in the United States. The articles in the rest of this issue report on what has been learned so far and on new ideas and insights that are emerging from experiments.AcknowledgmentsThe author gratefully acknowledges David Williams of the Oregon Department of Transportation for identifying the need for a plain-language treatment of this topic, and for his review of an earlier version of this work, and the research assistance of Evan Enarson-Hering of Cambridge Systematics and Alexander Heil, formerly of Cambridge Systematics. Reference1.King, D., M. Manville, and D. Shoup. The Political Calculusof Congestion Pricing. T ransport Policy, No. 14, pp. 111–123 (2007). /PoliticalCalculus.pdf. Additional ResourcesAdler, N., C. Nash, and E. Niskanen. Barriers to Efficient Cost-Based Pricing of Rail, Air, and Water T ransport Infrastruc-ture in Europe. 2003.Arnott, R. William Vickrey: Contributions to Public Policy.October 1997.Button, K. J. T ransport Economics, 2nd Edition. 1993. Hau, T. D. The Economic Fundamentals of Road Pricing: A Dia-grammatic Analysis. 1992.Lawphongpanich, S., and Y. Yin. Pareto Improving Congestion T olls for Road Networks. 2008.Lindsey, R. Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Road Pricing?The Intellectual History of an Idea. 2006.Lindsey, R. C., and E. T. Verhoef. T raffic Congestion and Congestion Pricing. 2000.Prud’homme, R. Marginal Social Cost Pricing inT ransport Policy. Discussion paper, 7thACEA [European Automobile Manu-facturers Association] ScientificAdvisory Group Meeting.Schweitzer, L., and B. D. Taylor.Just Pricing: The DistributionalEffects of Congestion Pricing andSales T axes. Springer Science and Busi-ness Media, 2008.Verhoef, E. Marginal Cost-Based Pricing in T rans-port: Key Implementation Issues from the Economic Per-spective. /public/Ev_v2.pdf.Smart Tag transponder. Technological and conceptual ideas for congestion pricing are continually being tested.P H O T O:S H A N N O NR IC ETR NEWS 263 JULY–AUGUST 20097T R N E W S 263 J U L Y –A U G U S T 20098Bhatt is President, K.T .Analytics, Bethesda,Maryland; Higgins is Vice President, K.T .Analytics, Oakland,California; and Berg is an independent consul-tant in Silver Spring,Maryland.Only 15 years ago, congestion pricing was in its infancy in the United States.A private pricing project in Orange County , California, was in the plan-ning and design phase, and several other projects were in planning stages with support from the Fed-eral Congestion Pricing Pilot Program. Since then,the Orange County project started operations, and the federal program has supported more than 50congestion pricing projects and studies in more than a dozen states, with more than 20 projects now oper-ating. The projects implemented or under investiga-tion include the pricing of high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes and new express lanes, the conversion of toll or toll-free facilities to variable tolls, and appli-cation of congestion pricing within a region.HOT Lane ConversionsThe most common application of congestion pricing in the United States involves the conversion of HOV lanes into high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes, which allow drivers of vehicles that do not meet the occu-pancy requirements to buy-in to the lanes by paying a toll that varies by time of day or by the level of con-gestion or demand. A rationale for converting to HOT lanes is that the HOV lanes are underused, despite increased congestion on the adjacent main lanes. Electronic tolling ensures high-speed access to the restricted lanes and the setting of rates to maintain the free flow of traffic. In this way , HOT lanes provide travelers facing traffic congestion with new choices.Motorists can choose to continue on the main untolled lanes at the available speed, or pay a toll to gain access to a high-speed alternative, or meet the minimum occupancy requirements and use the high-speed lanes for free. Some major HOT lane conver-sion projects are summarized in Table 1 (page 9).The earliest HOT lane conversion was the I-15FasTrak facility , which opened in 1996 in San Diego,California. The FasTrak tolls vary with the level of demand to maintain free-flowing traffic. Fees can vary as often as every 6 minutes, typically in 25-cent increments. Message signs at the entrance inform motorists of the current fee. Tolls typically vary between $0.50 and $4.00, but can reach $8.00 dur-ing peak periods. The average toll rate is approxi-mately $1.25 and seldom exceeds $4.00. Savings in travel time average 20 minutes per journey .Another early example is I-10 in Houston, T exas .The freeway’s HOV lane, which required a minimum of three occupants (HOV-3), was converted in 1998 to a HOT lane. Drivers of two-occupant vehicles can buy-in to the lanes during the times that three-occu-pant vehicles have access for free. This QuickRide program increased HOV-2 volume by 40 percent,while the HOV-3 volume decreased by less than 3 per-cent. The total volume on the HOT lane increased by 21 percent during the morning peak. The average speed on the general-purpose lanes was 25 miles per hour (mph) but exceeded 55 mph on the HOT lane,yielding a 17-minute time savings for the 13-mile trip. More recent examples of HOT lane conversions include I-25/US-36 in Denver, Colorado, started in 2006; the MnPASS I-394 project in Minneapolis,Minnesota, begun in 2005; and two that opened inU.S. and Worldwide Experience with Congestion PricingAn OverviewK I R A N B H A T T , T H O M A S H I G G I N S , A N D J O H N T. B E R GPricing Road Use to Address CongestionP HOTO : T REVOR W RAYTON , V IRGINIA D EPARTMENTOFT RANSPORTATIONThe Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project is currently under construction in Northern Virginia.。
Traffic congestion has become a common issue in many cities around the world, especially during rush hours. It not only wastes a lot of time but also causes air pollution and noise pollution. Here are some reasons and solutions for this problem.Firstly, the increasing number of vehicles is the main reason for traffic congestion. With the improvement of peoples living standards, more and more people can afford cars. However, the roads are not expanding as fast as the number of vehicles is growing. This leads to heavy traffic on the roads, especially during peak hours.Secondly, poor urban planning is also a contributing factor to traffic congestion. In some cities, the roads are not well designed, and there are not enough roads to meet the traffic demand. Moreover, some roads are too narrow, which makes it difficult for vehicles to pass through smoothly.To solve the traffic congestion problem, several measures can be taken. Firstly, governments can encourage people to use public transportation by improving the quality and convenience of public transport services. This can reduce the number of private cars on the roads.Secondly, governments can invest in the construction of more roads and expand the existing ones to accommodate more vehicles. They can also improve the road system by adding more lanes and overpasses.Thirdly, traffic management can be enhanced by using advanced technology, such as traffic lights and road signs, to control the flow of vehicles. Traffic police can also be deployed to direct traffic during peak hours.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. By taking the above measures, we can alleviate the traffic congestion and make our cities more livable. It requires the joint efforts of governments, citizens, and businesses to create a better traffic environment.。
The automobile has become an integral part of modern society,offering a myriad of benefits and conveniences,yet it also brings with it a set of challenges and drawbacks. Here is an essay discussing the pros and cons of automobiles in English.Title:The Pros and Cons of AutomobilesIntroduction:The automobile has revolutionized the way we live and travel.It has transformed our cities,economies,and lifestyles.However,with every advantage comes a potential downside.This essay will explore the benefits and drawbacks of automobiles in our daily lives.Body:Pros of Automobiles:1.Convenience:Owning a car provides unparalleled convenience.It allows individuals to travel at their own pace,without relying on public transportation schedules.2.TimeSaving:Cars can significantly reduce travel time,especially for long distances. This efficiency can lead to increased productivity and more time for leisure activities.3.Personal Freedom:Cars offer a sense of freedom and independence.They enable people to explore new places and travel off the beaten path.fort:Traveling in a personal vehicle can be more comfortable than using public transport,with control over the environment,such as temperature and music.5.Emergency Readiness:Having a car can be crucial in emergencies,providing quick access to hospitals or other essential services.Cons of Automobiles:1.Environmental Impact:The combustion engines of cars contribute to air pollution and climate change.Emissions from vehicles are a significant source of greenhouse gases.2.Traffic Congestion:As the number of cars on the road increases,so does traffic congestion.This not only wastes time but also leads to increased stress and frustration.3.Cost:Cars are expensive to purchase,maintain,and insure.The ongoing costs of fuel,repairs,and parking can be a financial burden for many families.4.Safety Concerns:Despite advancements in safety features,car accidents are still a leading cause of injury and death worldwide.Distracted driving and speeding contribute to this issue.5.Urban Planning Challenges:The prevalence of cars has led to the need for more roads and parking spaces,which can encroach on green spaces and contribute to urban sprawl.Conclusion:While automobiles offer numerous advantages,such as convenience and personal freedom,they also present significant challenges,including environmental harm and traffic issues.As we move forward,it is crucial to find a balance between the benefits of car ownership and the need for sustainable and efficient transportation solutions.The rise of electric vehicles and improved public transport systems may offer a path toward mitigating some of the negative impacts of traditional automobiles.。
Traffic congestion is a pressing issue in many urban areas around the world.It not only disrupts daily commutes but also has significant environmental and economic impacts.Here are some of the key aspects related to this topic:1.Causes of Traffic Congestion:The primary reasons for traffic congestion include a high volume of vehicles on the road,inadequate road infrastructure,poor traffic management,and accidents.Additionally,population growth and urbanization contribute to the increase in the number of vehicles.2.Effects on Environment:Traffic jams lead to increased emissions from vehicles, contributing to air pollution and climate change.The idling of cars in traffic also wastes fuel,which is not only economically inefficient but also harmful to the environment.3.Economic Impact:Congestion can lead to increased travel times,which in turn affects productivity.Businesses may suffer from late deliveries and increased operational costs due to time spent in traffic.Moreover,the cost of maintaining and expanding road infrastructure to accommodate growing traffic is significant.4.Health Implications:Prolonged exposure to traffic congestion can have negative effects on mental and physical health.Stress levels can rise due to the frustration of being stuck in traffic,and air pollution from vehicle emissions can lead to respiratory problems and other health issues.5.Solutions to Traffic Congestion:Various strategies can be employed to alleviate traffic congestion,such as improving public transportation systems,encouraging the use of bicycles and walking,implementing congestion pricing,and investing in smart traffic management systems.Urban planning that prioritizes mixeduse development can also help reduce the need for long commutes.6.Role of Technology:Advancements in technology,such as autonomous vehicles, ridesharing apps,and realtime traffic monitoring systems,have the potential to reduce congestion by optimizing traffic flow and reducing the number of vehicles on the road.7.Public Awareness and Behavior Change:Educating the public about the benefits of using public transport,carpooling,and adjusting travel times to avoid peak hours can also contribute to reducing traffic congestion.ernment Policies and Regulations:Governments play a crucial role in implementing policies that can help reduce traffic congestion,such as investing in public transportation,enforcing traffic laws,and promoting sustainable urban development.9.International Comparisons:Looking at how other countries manage their traffic can provide insights into best practices and innovative solutions that can be adapted to different contexts.10.Future Outlook:As cities continue to grow,it is essential to plan for sustainable transportation systems that can accommodate increasing demand without exacerbating congestion.This includes considering the integration of new technologies and innovative urban planning strategies.Addressing traffic congestion requires a multifaceted approach that involves government, businesses,and individuals working together to create a more efficient and sustainable transportation system.。
Traffic congestion has become a common issue in many cities around the world, especially during rush hours. It not only wastes a lot of time but also causes air pollution and noise pollution. Here are some reasons and solutions for this problem.Firstly, the increasing number of vehicles is the main reason for traffic congestion. With the improvement of peoples living standards, more and more people can afford cars. However, the roads are not expanding as fast as the number of vehicles is growing. This leads to heavy traffic on the roads, especially during peak hours.Secondly, poor urban planning is also a contributing factor to traffic congestion. In some cities, the roads are not well designed, and there are not enough roads to meet the traffic demand. Moreover, some roads are too narrow, which makes it difficult for vehicles to pass through smoothly.To solve the traffic congestion problem, several measures can be taken. Firstly, governments can encourage people to use public transportation by improving the quality and convenience of public transport services. This can reduce the number of private cars on the roads.Secondly, governments can invest in the construction of more roads and expand the existing ones to accommodate more vehicles. They can also improve the road system by adding more lanes and overpasses.Thirdly, traffic management can be enhanced by using advanced technology, such as traffic lights and road signs, to control the flow of vehicles. Traffic police can also be deployed to direct traffic during peak hours.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. By taking the above measures, we can alleviate the traffic congestion and make our cities more livable. It requires the joint efforts of governments, citizens, and businesses to create a better traffic environment.。
雅思大作文关于交通Traffic congestion is a major issue in many cities around the world, and it has significant impacts on people's daily lives, the environment, and the economy. This essay will explore the causes of traffic congestion, its effects, and potential solutions to this problem.One of the main causes of traffic congestion is the increasing number of vehicles on the road. As the population of urban areas continues to grow, more and more people are purchasing cars, leading to overcrowded roads and highways. In addition, the lack of efficient public transportation systems in many cities also contributes to the problem, as people are forced to rely on their own vehicles to get around.The effects of traffic congestion are far-reaching and can have a significant impact on people's lives. For one, it leads to increased stress and frustrationfor drivers, as they are forced to spend more time sitting in traffic and less time with their families or engaging in leisure activities. Furthermore, traffic congestion also has negative effects on the environment, as it leads to increased air pollution and carbon emissions. This can have serious health implications for people living in urban areas, as poor air quality can lead to respiratory problems and other health issues.In addition to its impact on individuals and the environment, traffic congestion also has economic consequences. The time and fuel wasted sitting in traffic jams cost the economy billions of dollars each year. Furthermore, businesses suffer as a result of traffic congestion, as it leads to delays in the delivery of goods and services, and can discourage potential customers fromvisiting their establishments.There are several potential solutions to the problem of traffic congestion, and many cities around the world are already implementing measures to address this issue. One approach is to invest in public transportation infrastructure, such asexpanding and improving bus and train services, and building more bike lanes and pedestrian-friendly pathways. This can help to reduce the number of cars on the road and provide people with viable alternatives to driving.Another potential solution is to implement congestion pricing, where drivers are charged a fee for using certain roads or entering certain areas during peak hours. This has been successful in cities like London and Singapore, where it has helped to reduce traffic congestion and generate revenue for transportation infrastructure improvements.Furthermore, city planners can also work to improve traffic flow by implementing smarter traffic management systems, such as synchronized traffic lights and intelligent transportation systems. These technologies can help to optimize the flow of traffic and reduce congestion on the roads.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a significant problem that has wide-ranging impacts on people's lives, the environment, and the economy. However, there are a number of potential solutions to this issue, and it is important for cities to continue to invest in public transportation infrastructure, implement congestion pricing, and improve traffic management systems in order to address this problem. By taking action to reduce traffic congestion, cities can improve the quality of life for their residents and create more sustainable and livable urban environments.。
Traffic congestion has become a common issue in many cities around the world, especially during rush hours. It not only wastes a lot of time but also causes air pollution and noise pollution. Here are some reasons and solutions for this problem.Firstly, the increasing number of vehicles is the main reason for traffic congestion. With the improvement of peoples living standards, more and more people can afford cars. However, the roads are not expanding as fast as the number of vehicles is growing. This leads to heavy traffic on the roads, especially during peak hours.Secondly, poor urban planning is also a contributing factor to traffic congestion. In some cities, the roads are not well designed, and there are not enough roads to meet the traffic demand. Moreover, some roads are too narrow, which makes it difficult for vehicles to pass through smoothly.To solve the traffic congestion problem, several measures can be taken. Firstly, governments can encourage people to use public transportation by improving the quality and convenience of public transport services. This can reduce the number of private cars on the roads.Secondly, governments can invest in the construction of more roads and expand the existing ones to accommodate more vehicles. They can also improve the road system by adding more lanes and overpasses.Thirdly, traffic management can be enhanced by using advanced technology, such as traffic lights and road signs, to control the flow of vehicles. Traffic police can also be deployed to direct traffic during peak hours.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. By taking the above measures, we can alleviate the traffic congestion and make our cities more livable. It requires the joint efforts of governments, citizens, and businesses to create a better traffic environment.。
关于交通拥堵的英文作文英文:Traffic congestion has become a major issue in many cities around the world. As someone who lives in a busy city, I have experienced the frustration of being stuck in traffic for hours on end. There are several reasons for traffic congestion, including the increase in population, the rise of personal vehicles, and poor infrastructure.One of the main causes of traffic congestion is the increase in population. As more people move into cities, the number of vehicles on the road also increases. This puts a strain on the road network, causing traffic jams and delays. Another reason for traffic congestion is the rise of personal vehicles. Many people now own cars, which they use to commute to work or run errands. This has led to an increase in traffic on the roads, making it more difficult to get around.Poor infrastructure is also a contributing factor to traffic congestion. In many cities, the roads are not designed to handle the volume of traffic that theycurrently experience. This leads to bottlenecks and delays, which make it difficult for drivers to get to their destinations on time.To address the issue of traffic congestion, there are several solutions that can be implemented. One solution is to improve public transportation. This would encourage people to use public transport instead of their personal vehicles, reducing the number of cars on the road. Another solution is to invest in better infrastructure, including wider roads and better traffic management systems. This would help to reduce bottlenecks and improve the flow of traffic.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a major issue that affects many cities around the world. While there are several reasons for this problem, there are also solutions that can be implemented to reduce congestion and make our cities more livable.中文:交通拥堵已经成为世界上许多城市的主要问题。
Traffic congestion is a pressing issue that plagues many urban areas around the world.It not only affects the daily commute of individuals but also has broader implications for the economy,environment,and overall quality of life.In this essay,we will explore the causes of traffic congestion,its consequences,and potential solutions to alleviate this problem.Causes of Traffic Congestion1.Population Growth:As cities expand,the number of vehicles on the road increases, leading to more traffic.2.Urban Sprawl:The spread of cities into suburban areas often results in longer commutes,which can exacerbate congestion.3.Inadequate Public Transportation:In many cities,public transportation systems are underdeveloped,encouraging reliance on personal vehicles.4.Road Infrastructure:Poorly designed or insufficient road networks can lead to bottlenecks and traffic jams.5.Economic Factors:Economic prosperity often leads to an increase in car ownership, contributing to congestion.6.Cultural and Behavioral Factors:In some cultures,owning a car is seen as a status symbol,which can lead to more cars on the road.Consequences of Traffic Congestion1.Time Loss:Commuters spend more time stuck in traffic,which can lead to stress and reduced productivity.2.Environmental Impact:Increased vehicle emissions contribute to air pollution and climate change.3.Economic Costs:Traffic congestion can lead to higher transportation costs for businesses and individuals,as well as reduced economic activity.4.Health Issues:Prolonged exposure to vehicle emissions can lead to respiratory problems and other health issues.5.Safety Concerns:Congested roads can increase the risk of accidents,leading to injuries and fatalities.Potential Solutions to Traffic Congestion1.Improving Public Transportation:Investing in efficient,reliable,and affordable public transit can reduce the number of cars on the road.2.Urban Planning:Designing cities with mixeduse spaces can reduce the need for long commutes and encourage walking and cycling.3.Traffic Management:Implementing intelligent traffic systems and better traffic management can optimize the flow of traffic.4.Carpooling and Ridesharing:Encouraging carpooling and ridesharing can reduce the number of vehicles on the road.5.Congestion Pricing:Implementing congestion pricing in hightraffic areas can discourage unnecessary car use.6.Promoting Sustainable Transportation:Encouraging the use of electric vehicles, bicycles,and other sustainable modes of transportation can reduce emissions and congestion.cational Campaigns:Raising awareness about the impacts of traffic congestion and promoting alternative transportation options can change public behavior.In conclusion,traffic congestion is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. By understanding its causes and consequences,and by implementing a combination of the solutions outlined above,cities can work towards reducing traffic congestion and improving the quality of life for their residents.It is essential for policymakers,urban planners,and the public to work together to create sustainable and efficient transportation systems that can accommodate the needs of a growing population while minimizing the negative impacts on the environment and society.。
北师大版教材高考英语第二轮复习书面表达专题之模块话题作文精选(必修一至选修八)假如你叫陈宇,你的英国笔友Mike在上次来信中谈到了低碳生活这个话题。
最近几个月校倡导学生过低碳生活、过节约生活、做有责任感的公民,引导学生从出行、购物、用水、家电和餐具使用方面反省自己的生活方式。
请你用英文给Mike回信。
回信要点如下:1.你对低碳生活的理解2.你校展开的活动3.你最近生活方式的改变(至少选择三个方面)注意:1.词数为100左右;2.参考词汇低碳生活low carbon lifestyle 3.信的开头和结尾已为你写好(不计入你所写词数)Dear Mike,How are things going? In your last letter you talked about low carbon life. Now I’d like to share my understanding of it and my experience in the past few months.With the environment problem coming into attention, it is extremely important that we take action to protect our planet. As more people are determined to make a difference, low carbon lifestyle provides us with the perfect opportunity to do it. Interestingly, our school called on students to develop a low carbon lifestyle and become a responsible citizen several months ago. In response to the appeal, I have made some changes in my way of life, which ranges from transportation to water saving. For example, instead of asking my parents to drive me to school, I take a bus to and from school. just like my schoolmates, I now refuse to use disposable chopsticks. At home, I even persuade my parents to reuse water, even though it is not so convenient. TV and computer are important entertainment for my family, but we sometimes read instead, which, I think, may help relieve the shortage of electricity.I’m really glad to communicate with you about this topic.书面表达:(必修一Unit 2)中国女药学家屠呦呦在2015年获得了诺贝尔医学奖,中国人的骄傲。
解决拥堵的英语作文英文回答:Traffic congestion is a major problem facing cities around the world. It can cause significant delays, increased pollution, and reduced quality of life for residents. There are a number of potential solutions to traffic congestion, including:Improving public transportation: Public transportation can help to reduce traffic congestion by providing an alternative to driving. By making public transportation more affordable, reliable, and convenient, people are more likely to use it instead of driving.Encouraging walking and biking: Walking and biking are both healthy and environmentally friendly ways to get around. By making cities more walkable and bikeable, people are more likely to choose these modes of transportation over driving.Implementing congestion pricing: Congestion pricing is a system of charging drivers for using roads during peak traffic times. This can help to reduce traffic congestion by discouraging people from driving during these times.Investing in new infrastructure: Investing in new infrastructure, such as new roads and bridges, can help to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. However, it is important to note that new infrastructure can also lead to induced demand, which is when increased road capacity leads to more people driving.Promoting telecommuting and flexible work schedules: Telecommuting and flexible work schedules can help to reduce traffic congestion by allowing people to work from home or at flexible hours. This can help to reduce the number of cars on the road during peak traffic times.中文回答:如何解决拥堵?交通拥堵是世界各地城市面临的一个主要问题。
造成交通堵塞的原因和建议英语作文全文共6篇示例,供读者参考篇1Causes of Traffic Congestion and SuggestionsHello everyone! Today, I want to talk about traffic congestion. Have you ever been stuck in traffic? It can be really frustrating, right? Well, let's find out why traffic jams happen and what we can do to make things better.There are several reasons why traffic congestion occurs. One major reason is the increase in the number of vehicles on the road. As more and more people own cars, the roads get crowded. When there are too many cars, it becomes difficult for them to move freely, causing traffic jams. Another reason is the lack of proper planning and infrastructure. Sometimes, roads are not built wide enough to accommodate the growing number of vehicles, which leads to congestion.Traffic accidents also contribute to traffic congestion. When accidents happen, the affected vehicles block the flow of traffic, causing long delays. Additionally, some drivers do not followtraffic rules and drive recklessly. This can lead to accidents, which in turn cause traffic jams.Now that we understand some of the reasons behind traffic congestion, let's discuss some suggestions to improve the situation. One solution is to encourage people to use public transportation more often. If more people take buses or trains instead of driving their cars, there will be fewer vehicles on the road, and traffic congestion will decrease. Public transportation is also good for the environment because it reduces air pollution.Another suggestion is to promote carpooling. Carpooling means sharing a ride with others who are going in the same direction. By carpooling, we can reduce the number of cars on the road. It's not only a great way to make new friends but also helps to ease traffic congestion.Furthermore, we can encourage people to walk or ride bicycles for short distances. If the destination is nearby, it's better to use our legs or bicycles instead of cars. This not only helps reduce traffic congestion but also keeps us fit and healthy!In addition to these suggestions, the government can play a vital role in reducing traffic congestion. They can invest in improving public transportation systems and building better roads. By implementing traffic management strategies like trafficsignals, roundabouts, and one-way routes, they can ensure smooth traffic flow and reduce congestion.To conclude, traffic congestion happens due to the increase in the number of vehicles, lack of proper planning, accidents, and reckless driving. To alleviate this issue, we can encourage the use of public transportation, promote carpooling, and encourage walking or cycling for short distances. The government's support in improving infrastructure and implementing traffic management strategies is also crucial. By working together, we can make our roads less congested and our journeys smoother.Remember, even as young students, we can contribute to solving this problem by making wise transportation choices and spreading awareness about the importance of reducing traffic congestion. Let's take the first step towards a better future with less traffic jams!I hope you find this essay helpful. Good luck with your writing, and keep up the great work!篇2Causes of Traffic Congestion and SuggestionsHello, everyone! Today, I want to talk about something that affects many people every day: traffic congestion. Have you ever been stuck in traffic and wondered why the cars aren't moving? Well, let's find out the reasons behind traffic congestion and discuss some suggestions to solve this problem.There are several causes of traffic congestion. One major reason is the increase in the number of vehicles on the road. As more and more people own cars, the roads become crowded, especially during rush hours. This leads to slower traffic and longer travel times. Additionally, some drivers don't follow traffic rules properly, such as not using turn signals or cutting in front of others. These actions can cause accidents and traffic jams.Another reason for traffic congestion is road construction and repairs. While these activities are necessary to improve our roads, they can also disrupt the flow of traffic. When lanes are closed or detours are put in place, it slows down the movement of vehicles and creates bottlenecks. Sometimes, road construction projects take longer than expected, further aggravating the congestion problem.Furthermore, lack of proper public transportation options is also a contributing factor. Many people rely on their cars because there are not enough convenient buses or trainsavailable. When a large number of people drive their cars, it adds to the congestion on the roads. Encouraging the use of public transportation can help reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality.Now, let's discuss some suggestions to alleviate traffic congestion. First, we can promote carpooling or sharing rides with others. If more people travel together in one car, it means fewer cars on the road. This can help reduce traffic and make the journey faster for everyone. We can also encourage parents to organize walking or cycling groups for children who live nearby. Not only is it good for the environment, but it also reduces traffic around schools.In addition, investing in better public transportation systems can make a big difference. Governments should focus on improving bus and train services, making them more frequent and reliable. This will encourage more people to use public transportation instead of driving their cars. It would be great if there are dedicated bus lanes and bike lanes to make commuting easier and faster.Another suggestion is to educate drivers about the importance of following traffic rules and being considerate on the road. We can have campaigns and programs in schools toteach children about road safety and etiquette. When we grow up, we will become responsible drivers who respect others and help reduce traffic congestion.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a problem that affects many people. The increase in the number of vehicles, road construction, and lack of proper public transportation are the main causes of congestion. By promoting carpooling, improving public transportation, and educating drivers, we can all contribute to reducing traffic congestion and making our roads safer and smoother. Remember, even small actions can make a big difference. Let's all work together to solve this problem!I hope you found this essay helpful and informative. Let's raise awareness about traffic congestion and strive for a better future. Thank you!篇3The Big Traffic Jam ProblemHave you ever been stuck in a big traffic jam? It's the worst! You're just trying to get to school or soccer practice, and the cars around you aren't moving at all. After what feels like forever, you finally get to where you need to go, but you're already late. Ugh!Traffic jams happen when there are too many cars on the road at the same time, and they cause all kinds of problems. First, they make people late for important things like work, appointments, or picking up little brothers and sisters. Sitting in traffic is also really boring and frustrating. Nobody likes wasting time just sitting there doing nothing!But traffic jams don't just waste time – they also waste gas and cause air pollution that is bad for the environment. When cars are stuck not moving, they still have to keep their engines running. That burns up a lot of gas. And exhaust from all those idling cars releases gross fumes and smoke into the air that we have to breathe. Yuck!So what causes these big traffic jams in the first place? Well, there are a few different reasons:Too many cars on the road at once: This is probably the biggest cause. Think about it - if there's a road that can normally handle 100 cars easily, but 200 cars all try to use it at the same time, it's going to get crazy jammed up. Especially during rush hours when everyone is trying to get to work or home from work and school at the same times.Accidents: When there is a crash or disabled vehicle in the road, it blocks up some of the lanes. Then all the cars get backedup trying to squeeze into the remaining open lanes. That's how one little accident can cause a huge traffic jam that goes on for miles!Road work: Sometimes the roads themselves are a mess with construction zones for repairs, building new lanes, or fixing potholes and cracks. The workers have to block off or divert lanes to have room to work safely, and that squeezes the traffic flow even tighter through those zones.Bad weather: When it rains, snows, or there's fog or storms, roads get slippery and drivers have to slow way down to avoid skidding into accidents. That scrunches all the cars closer together and clogs things up. Rough weather can also knock down trees or power lines that block lanes too.Rubbernecking: Whenever there is some incident on the side of the road, like a small fender-bender or cops pulling someone over, other drivers always have to slow down to see what's going on. That creates a "rubbernecker's slowdown" that ripples backwards and causes backups.So those are some of the biggest reasons we end up with big traffic tie-ups. Now what can we do to try to reduce them?First, taking buses, trains, bikes or walking instead of driving a car helps reduce the total number of vehicles on the road. Cars take up a lot of space compared to buses that can move many more people through the same space. So using more public transportation and leaving the car at home would be a great start.Cities can also try to make their road systems smarter with programmable traffic lights and displays that adjust timing based on actual traffic patterns through the day. They could even have robots or drones that help clear stalled vehicles from the roads faster when accidents happen. Improving design to have more turns, dedicated lanes, overpasses and alternate routes would give drivers more options.Governments could encourage more people to useтелеработа (work from home) schedules at least a couple days per week. With fewer commuters on the roads, that would spread out the peaks of highest traffic volumes.Cities might want to look at having smarter schoolbuses that use computerized routing to pick up students in the most efficient sequence across neighborhoods too. That could cut down on the number of buses bunching up in certain areas.We can't snap our fingers and instantly fix all traffic everywhere. But if we all work together and our community leaders are smart about designing better transportation systems and behaviors, we can definitely start chipping away at those monster traffic jams. Then maybe we won't be late to so many important things anymore! What a dream that would be.篇4Causes of Traffic Congestion and SuggestionsHello everyone! Today, I would like to talk about a common problem that we all face in our daily lives – traffic congestion. Traffic congestion happens when there are too many vehicles on the road, making it difficult for cars, buses, and even bicycles to move smoothly. It can be frustrating and cause delays. Let's explore some of the reasons why traffic congestion occurs and what we can do to alleviate this problem.One of the main causes of traffic congestion is the increase in the number of vehicles on the road. As more people can afford cars and motorbikes, the roads become crowded. Imagine if all of us decided to travel to school in our own cars – the roads would be packed with vehicles, and it would take a long time to get to school! So, one solution is to encourage more people touse public transportation, such as buses or trains. Public transport can carry many people at once, reducing the number of vehicles on the road.Another reason for traffic congestion is the lack of proper road infrastructure. Sometimes, the roads are too narrow or poorly designed, causing bottlenecks and slowing down the traffic flow. To address this issue, the government can invest in building wider roads and adding more lanes. This would provide more space for vehicles to move freely and reduce congestion.Additionally, people not following traffic rules and regulations can contribute to traffic congestion. Some drivers may not obey traffic signals, change lanes without signaling, or park their cars in inappropriate places. These actions disrupt the smooth flow of traffic and lead to congestion. It is essential for everyone, including children, to learn and follow traffic rules. We can also raise awareness about the importance of obeying traffic regulations through campaigns and school programs.Another factor that contributes to traffic congestion is the lack of parking spaces. When people cannot find a parking spot, they may park their cars on the side of the road, blocking the traffic. To solve this problem, the government can build more parking lots and encourage people to use them. Furthermore,promoting the use of bicycles or walking for short distances can reduce the number of vehicles on the road, making traffic flow more smoothly.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a problem that affects all of us. It is caused by the increase in the number of vehicles, poor road infrastructure, violations of traffic rules, and insufficient parking spaces. To alleviate this issue, we can encourage the use of public transportation, improve road infrastructure, educate people about traffic rules, and provide more parking spaces. Let's work together to make our roads safer and less congested!Remember, even as students, we can contribute to reducing traffic congestion by being responsible road users and spreading awareness among our friends and family. Together, we can make a difference!I hope you found this article helpful, and I wish you all a smooth and congestion-free journey ahead. Thank you!篇5What Causes Traffic Jams and How Can We Fix Them?Traffic jams are the worst! They make you late for school, sports practice, or hanging out with friends. And they make yourparents stressed and grumpy when you're stuck in the car forever. I hate sitting in traffic, but I see it happening all the time on the roads near my house. Why does it happen so much? And what can we do to make it better? Let me tell you what I think!One of the biggest causes of traffic jams is too many cars on the road. Seems obvious, right? But it's true! The more cars that are driving around, the more likely you'll hit a jam. Especially if there is an accident or construction that blocks some of the lanes. With fewer lanes, all those cars get bunched together and can't go anywhere fast.My dad says a lot of those cars have just one person in them - the driver. He calls them "single occupancy vehicles." If more people carpooled or took buses and trains, there would be less traffic. Unfortunately, a lot of grown-ups seem to really like driving alone in their own cars. I don't get it - buses and trains seem way more fun to me since you can talk and play games with your friends!Another major cause is people driving too fast or too slow on the highway. If someone is going really slowly in the left lane meant for faster traffic, it backs everything up. Or if someone is zipping around going way too fast, they have to constantly hit the brakes for cars in front of them. That slam on the brakescauses a "shockwave" that slows down everyone behind them too. My dad yells a lot about people not using the correct lanes or going jerky speeds.Bad weather like ice, snow, rain, and fog also leads to way more traffic jams. When the roads are slick, everyone has to drive slower to avoid skidding into other cars. Sudden storms can make stuff pretty crazy on the roads too. One time we got caught in a huge thunderstorm on the highway and it seemed like everyone pulled over at the same time in a panicky traffic jam!Accidents are another obvious reason for jams. Even a small fender-bender can bring everything to a standstill on a busy road. That's because lots of rubberneckers will slow way down to try and see what happened. My mom calls them "hamptons" because they can't seem to help gawking at the accident. Pretty silly if you ask me!There are also just too many people on the road at certain times of day trying to get to work or school at the same time. My dad calls it "rush hour" but it lasts like 3 hours! Those jam-packed roads in the morning and evening cause a ton of delays. I always feel bad for my parents having to battle through that every day.So those are some of the main causes I've noticed for traffic jams. But what can we do to help reduce them? Here are some of my ideas:First, we gotta get more people to carpool, ride buses, take trains, walk, or bike instead of driving solo. Convince your parents to pick up a few kids from your neighborhood and rotate being the "carpool kid hauler." More people per car means fewer cars on the roads. You could even make a game out of it in the carpool van!Speaking of games, parents should play road games with their kids on trips to help avoid frustration in jams. The license plate game, I Spy, 20 Questions - those are all fun ways to pass delay times without going crazy. Bringing snacks, movies, and books can help too.City planners should try to have better coordinated street lights and smarter systems for keeping traffic moving smoothly. My third grade teacher said some cities have cameras and computers that can adjust lights to prevent unnecessary backups. Way smarter than just having lights change at fixed times!Maybe we should have highway lanes just for carpools, like a carpool incentive. Or a tax on solo drivers during peak jam timesto encourage carpooling. We could use that tax money to build better public transit systems too.And drivers for sure need to be more careful and follow the rules of the road better. Go the speed limit, use turn signals, don't tailgate, and stay out ofthe left lane unless you're passing someone. All that reckless driving just clogs things up.Construction crews should also try to minimize how many lanes get blocked during road work. Maybe they could rent truck-mounted traffic lights to cut down on backups. Or do more construction at night when the roads are emptier.Speaking of night work, maybe some companies could let employees work from home certain days to cut down on commuter traffic. I heard there are lots of people now who just video call into the office from their houses using laptops and stuff.Lastly, I think cities should invest in better public transportation like bullet trains between cities and neighborhoods. Having an awesome subway or monorail system would get so many people off the highways and roads. Imagine how less jammed it would be! Some of my friends in other countries say they can zoom around on high-speed trains instead of sitting in horrible traffic all the time.Well, those are my thoughts on why traffic seems so crazy these days and what we could possibly do to untangle it. I'm sure the grown-ups have some other good ideas too. But us kids are sick of being stuck in jams on the way to fun stuff! Hopefully, we can all figure out solutions to make our roads less con-jamed. Then maybe my parents will finally stop yelling at other drivers so much!篇6Traffic Congestion: Causes and SuggestionsHello everyone! Today, I want to talk about a big problem that many cities face - traffic congestion. Have you ever been stuck in traffic and felt like you were going nowhere? It can be really frustrating, right? Well, let's find out why traffic congestion happens and what we can do to make it better.There are several reasons why traffic congestion occurs. First, there are too many cars on the road. As more and more people own cars, the number of vehicles on the streets increases. This leads to crowded roads and traffic jams. Second, some drivers don't follow the traffic rules. They might park their cars in the wrong places or change lanes without signaling, which causes confusion and slows down the flow of traffic. Lastly, roadconstruction and accidents can also contribute to traffic congestion. When roads are blocked or closed, it creates bottlenecks and delays for everyone.Now that we know the causes, let's think about some solutions to reduce traffic congestion. One idea is to encourage people to use public transportation. Buses, trains, and subways can carry a lot of people at once, reducing the number of cars on the road. It would be great if more people could take the bus or train to school or work. Another solution is to promote walking and biking. If the distance is short, we can choose to walk or ride a bicycle instead of taking a car. This not only helps to reduce traffic but also keeps us healthy and active!In addition, carpooling is another effective way to alleviate traffic congestion. Instead of everyone driving their own car, friends, neighbors, or colleagues can share a ride together. This means fewer cars on the road, which leads to less congestion. Carpooling can also save money on gas and reduce air pollution. Isn't that amazing?Furthermore, we need to educate drivers about the importance of following traffic rules. It's crucial to park our cars in designated areas and obey traffic signs. When we all follow the rules, traffic flows more smoothly, and congestion can bereduced. We should also learn to be patient and polite on the road. Honking the horn or getting angry won't make the traffic move faster. Let's treat each other with kindness and respect.Lastly, city planners and government officials can play a significant role in reducing traffic congestion. They can invest in building more roads and improving existing ones. They can also create better public transportation systems with more buses and trains running frequently. Additionally, they can implement traffic management strategies like synchronized traffic lights to keep the traffic flowing smoothly.In conclusion, traffic congestion is a common problem in many cities. The causes include too many cars, drivers not following traffic rules, and road construction or accidents. To tackle this issue, we can encourage the use of public transportation, promote walking and biking, practice carpooling, educate drivers about traffic rules, and improve the infrastructure. Remember, even as young students, we can make a difference by making smart choices and spreading awareness about the importance of reducing traffic congestion. Let's work together to create a smoother and happier traffic experience for everyone!。
解决交通拥挤的方法英语作文Traffic congestion is a widespread issue that plagues cities across the globe, causing delays, increased travel times, and a significant drain on the economy. As urbanization continues to accelerate, the problem is becoming increasingly urgent, demanding innovative and comprehensive solutions. In addressing traffic congestion, a multi-faceted approach is necessary, encompassing improvements in infrastructure, technological advancements, policy changes, and public awareness.Infrastructure improvements are a critical component of any strategy to address traffic congestion. Investing in roads, bridges, and public transportation systems can significantly enhance the efficiency of the transportation network. For instance, the construction of additional freeways or the expansion of existing ones can alleviate bottlenecks and improve the flow of traffic. Similarly, upgrading and expanding public transportation systems, such as buses, subways, and light rail, can encourage more people to use alternative modes of transportation, reducing the number of cars on the road.Technological advancements are also playing a key role in addressing traffic congestion. The emergence of smart traffic management systems, for instance, allows for real-time monitoring and adjustment of traffic flow, minimizing delays and maximizing efficiency. These systems can utilize data from various sources, including traffic cameras, sensors, and GPS devices, to provide a comprehensivepicture of traffic patterns and identify areas of congestion. By using this information, authorities can make informed decisions about when and where to implementtraffic control measures, such as traffic lights or speed limits.In addition to infrastructure and technological improvements, policy changes can also be effective in reducing traffic congestion. For instance, congestion pricing schemes, which charge higher fees for driving during peak hours, can discourage commuters from usingtheir cars during these periods. Similarly, carpooling and ride-sharing programs can reduce the number of vehicles on the road by allowing multiple people to travel in a single car. These policies can be further supported by incentivesfor alternative modes of transportation, such as providing tax breaks or subsidies for public transportation use.Finally, public awareness and education are essential in addressing traffic congestion. Promoting the benefits of alternative modes of transportation, such as walking, cycling, or using public transportation, can encourage people to make more sustainable travel choices. Additionally, educating drivers about safe and efficient driving practices, such as avoiding unnecessary acceleration and braking, can help reduce traffic congestion and improve overall road safety.In conclusion, addressing traffic congestion requires a comprehensive approach that encompasses infrastructure improvements, technological advancements, policy changes, and public awareness. By implementing these strategies, cities can improve the efficiency of their transportation systems, reduce traffic congestion, and create more livable and sustainable urban environments.**解决交通拥堵:多维度的策略**交通拥堵是困扰全球各大城市的普遍问题,它导致延误、增加旅行时间,并对经济产生巨大压力。
孔令斌李紫颜存量发展阶段的交通拥堵治理与公共交通优先摘要:城市交通拥堵治理与公共交通优先是中国从中央到城市层面交通发展中最受关注的两件大事。
大部分城市的交通拥堵治理中优先考虑的还是扩张道路规模以平衡机动车交通需求。
在部分城市已进入完全的用地存量发展阶段、绝大部分城市的存量发展地区规模很大的情况下,扩张道路规模的拥堵治理策略已经难以为继。
从存量发展阶段交通资源再分配入手,分析交通拥堵治理与公共交通优先的关系,强调将公共交通优先与交通拥堵治理合二为一。
提出存量发展阶段城市交通发展的目标是提升城市运行效率,保障城市正常运行;公共交通优先是存量发展阶段保障城市运行的必然选择,也是实现拥堵治理与公共交通优先双赢的切入点。
关键词:交通政策;存量发展;交通拥堵治理;公共交通优先;交通需求管理Traffic Congestion Management and Public Transportation Priority in Infill Development Stage Kong Lingbin 1,Li Ziyan 2(1.China Academy of Urban Planning &Design,Beijing 100037,China;2.High School Affiliated to BIT,Beijing 100089,China)Abstract :Traffic congestion management and prioritizing public transit are two of the most important is-sues in China,from centralized government at top to each urbanized area.The priority of traffic congestion management in most cities is till on roadway expansion to meet motor vehicle travel demand.While some cities already in the stage of infill development and majority of cities in extensive large-scale infill develop-ment,it is not sustainable to combat traffic congestion by roadway expansion.This paper analyzes the rela-tionship between traffic congestion management and public transit priority and emphasizes the importance of public transit in managing traffic congestion based on redistribute the transportation resources in the in-fill development stage.This paper further proposes that the goal of urban transportation development in the infill development stage is to improve the operation efficiency in urban area and ensure the city 's normal functionalities.Prioritizing public transit is the inevitable choice to ensure the operation of the city during the infill development stage and provides the win-win situation for congestion control.Keywords :transportation policy;infill development;traffic congestion management;public transportation priority;travel demand management 收稿日期:2018-12-09作者简介:孔令斌(1965—),男,山西阳泉人,博士,教授级高级工程师,副总工程师,主要研究方向:交通规划。
Traffic congestion is a common issue in many cities around the world,and it poses a significant challenge to urban planning and the quality of life for residents.It is essential to address this problem with a comprehensive approach that considers various factors and potential solutions.Causes of Traffic Congestion1.Population Growth:As cities expand,the number of vehicles on the road increases, leading to more traffic.2.Urban Sprawl:The spread of residential areas away from city centers often results in longer commutes and increased traffic.3.Inefficient Public Transportation:When public transport is not reliable,convenient,or affordable,more people opt to use private vehicles.4.Poor Road Infrastructure:Inadequate road networks and lack of maintenance can lead to bottlenecks and traffic jams.ck of Traffic Management:Inefficient traffic signals,lack of enforcement,and poor traffic planning contribute to congestion.Potential Solutions to Traffic Congestion1.Improving Public Transportation:Investing in public transport systems such as buses, trams,and trains can reduce the reliance on private vehicles.2.Promoting Sustainable Transportation:Encouraging cycling,walking,and carpooling can decrease the number of vehicles on the road.3.Implementing Traffic Management Systems:Using intelligent traffic systems to optimize traffic flow and reduce congestion.4.Expanding and Upgrading Road Infrastructure:Building new roads,widening existing ones,and improving intersections can alleviate traffic.5.Regulating Vehicle Use:Implementing policies such as congestion pricing,restricted vehicle access during peak hours,or promoting carfree days.6.Urban Planning:Designing cities with mixeduse spaces to reduce the need for long commutes and encouraging compact city layouts.Benefits of Solving Traffic Congestion1.Reduced Emissions:Fewer cars on the road can lead to lower greenhouse gas emissions and improved air quality.2.Improved Safety:Less traffic can result in fewer accidents and a safer environment for all road users.3.Increased Productivity:Reduced travel time can lead to more time for work or leisure,enhancing overall quality of life.4.Economic Benefits:Efficient transportation systems can boost economic activity by reducing the cost of commuting and improving access to jobs and services.ConclusionAddressing traffic congestion requires a multifaceted approach that includes improving public transportation,encouraging sustainable travel habits,and implementing effective traffic management strategies.By doing so,cities can not only reduce congestion but also create a more livable and environmentally friendly urban environment.It is crucial for policymakers and urban planners to work together to find innovative solutions that cater to the needs of the growing urban population.。
Traffic congestion and congestion pricingC. Robin Lindsey and Erik T. V erhoefDepartment of Economics University of Alberta Department of Spatial EconomicsFree University AmsterdamAbstractFor several decades growth of traffic volumes has outstripped investments in road infrastructure. The result has been a relentless increase in traffic congestion. This paperreviews the economic principles behind congestion pricing in static and dynamic settings,which derive from the benefits of charging travellers for the externalities they create. Specialattention is paid to various complications that make simple textbook congestion pricingmodels of limited relevance, and dictate that congestion pricing schemes be studied from theperspective of the theory of the second best. These complications include pricing in networks,heterogeneity of users, stochastic congestion, interactions of the transport sector with the restof the economy, and tolling on private roads. Also the implications of congestion pricing foroptimal road capacity are considered, and finally some explanations for the longstanding social and political resistance to road pricing are offered.Key words: congestion, road pricing, networksJEL codes: R41, R48, D621. IntroductionFor several decades growth of traffic volumes has outstripped investments in road infrastructure. The result has been a relentless increase in traffic congestion. Congestion imposes various costs on travellers: reduced speeds and increased travel times, a decrease in travel time reliability, greater fuel consumption and vehicle wear, inconvenience from rescheduling trips or using alternative travel modes, and (in the longer run) the costs of relocating residences and jobs. The costs of increased travel times and fuel consumption alone are estimated to amount to hundreds of dollars per capita per year in the US (Schrank and Lomax, 1999) and comparable values have been reported for Europe.Traffic congestion is a consequence of the nature of supply and demand: capacity is time- consuming and costly to build and is fixed for long time periods, demand fluctuates over time,and transport services cannot be stored to smooth imbalances between capacity and demand.V arious policies to curb traffic congestion have been adopted or proposed over the years. The traditional response is to expand capacity by building new roads or upgrading existing ones. A second method is to reduce demand by discouraging peak-period travel, limiting access tocongested areas by using permit systems and parking restrictions, imposing bans on commercial vehicles during certain hours, and so on. A third approach is to improve the efficiency of the road system, so that the same demand can be accommodated at a lower cost.Re-timing of traffic lights, metering access to highway entrance ramps, high-occupancy vehicle lanes and Advanced Traveller Information Systems are examples of such measures.This paper is concerned with congestion pricing as a tool for alleviating traffic congestion. The insight for congestion pricing comes from the observation that people tend to make socially efficient choices when they are faced with all the social benefits and costs of their actions. As just noted various demand management tools to accomplish this can be used.But congestion pricing is widely viewed by economists as the most efficient means because it employs the price mechanism, with all its advantages of clarity, universality, and efficiency. Pigou (1920) and Knight (1924) were the first to advocate it. But it was the late William Vickrey, who steadfastly promoted congestion pricing for some forty years, who was arguably the most influential in making the case on both theoretical and practical grounds. In one of his early advocacy pieces, Vickrey (1963) identified the potential for road pricing to influence travellers‟ choice of route and travel mode, and its implications for land use. He also discussed alternative methods of automated toll collection. Another of his early proposals was to set parking fees in real time as a function of the occupancy rate. An overview of Vickrey‟s contributions to pricing of urban private and public transport is found in Arnott et al. (1994,pp. 271-5).As Vickrey‟s work makes clear, true congestion pricing entails setting tolls that match the severity of congestion, which requires that tolls vary according to time, location, type of vehicle and current circumstances (e.g. accidents or bad weather). Congestion pricing is common in other sectors of the economy —from telephone rates and air fares to hotels and public utilities. But despite the efforts of Vickrey and other economists, congestion pricing is still rarely used on roads. Tolls are not charged on most roads, and fuel taxes do not vary with traffic volumes. And costs of registration, licensing and insurance do not even depend on distance travelled. Nevertheless, the number of applications and experiments in road pricing is slowly growing, spurred on by the combined impetus of worsening traffic conditions and advances in automatic vehicle identification technology. Descriptions of various road pricing schemes, including Singapore‟s pioneering toll system, Scandinavian toll-rings, and Californian pay-lanes are found in Gómez-Ibáñez and Small (1994) and Small and Gómez Ibáñez (1998).This paper is organized along similar lines to the review of congestion modelling in Lindsey and V erhoef (2000). Section 2 starts by outlining the basic economic principles of congestion pricing in a simple static (…time-independent‟) setting with one road. Section 3 adds a t ime element by considering travellers‟ time-of-use decisions and time-varying tolls. V arious complications are addressed in Section 4, including pricing in networks,heterogeneity of users, stochastic congestion, interactions of the transport sector with the rest of the economy, and tolling on private roads. Section 5 considers the implications of congestion pricing for optimal road capacity. Explanations for the longstanding social and political resistance to road pricing are offered in Section 6, and conclusions are drawn in Section 7. Due to space constraints some topics related to congestion pricing are not covered in this review. There is no explicit treatment of freight transportation. Nothing is said about the implications of congestion pricing for urban structure or the location of new developments. And only passing mention in Section 4 is given to the potential effectsof congestion pricing on traffic noise, pollution, and traffic accidents.2. Congestion pricing in time-independent modelsThe basic principles of congestion pricing can be illustrated in the following simple setting.Consider one origin and one destination connected by a single road. Individuals make trips alone in identical vehicles. Traffic flows, speeds and densities are uniform along the road and independent of time. Equilibrium in this setting is described in Figure 1, which is due to Walters (1961). The horizontal axis depicts traffic flow or volume: the rate at which trips are initiated and completed. The vertical axis depicts the price or …generalized cost‟ of a trip —which includes vehicle operating costs, the time costs of travel, and any toll. At low volumes vehicles can travel at the free-flow speed, and the trip cost curve, C(q), is constant at the free-flow cost Cff At higher volumes congestion develops, speed falls, and C(q) slopes upwards. The fact that a toll is required to support the social optimum reveals the fallacy that travellers fully pay for the congestion they cause through the time they personally lose.Analogously, a person squeezing through a crowd, a shopper queuing in line at a supermarket counter, or a person reading a popular library book after a long wait for it, impose costs on others that they do not themselves bear.3. Congestion pricing in time-dependent modelsTime-dependent models of congestion build on time-independent models by adding two elements: a specification of how travel demand depends on time, and a specification of how traffic flows evolve over time and space. To maintain focus on the time elements of congestion pricing, attention will be limited as in Section 2 to a single road joining one origin and one destination. Until near the end of Section 3 it will also be assumed that the total number of trips is fixed; i.e. price inelastic. But heterogeneity in the trip-timing preferences and time costs of travellers is allowed.Several policy lessons can now be drawn. First, congestion pricing not only reduces travel times but also affects schedule delay costs. A cost-benefit analysis that considered only travel times could be biased either for or against a congestion pricing project, and might lead either to unwarranted acceptance or rejection of it. Second, the efficiency gains from congestion pricing are of the same order of magnitude as toll revenue, and can even exceed it. By contrast, the efficiency gains from flat tolls computed using static models can be dwarfed by the toll transfers involved. This suggests that the economics of dynamic congestion pricing schemes are not as sensitive to the costs of infrastructure and operation as are the economics of tolling schemes in static models. Third, congestion pricing has welfare distributional effects on travellers that tend to favour those with high values of time. Because value of time is positively correlated with income, this is consistent with the conventional view that tolling is regressive. Finally, under the fine toll all individuals pay the full marginal social costs of their trips, regardless of their respective characteristics and of when they travel.4. Second-best issues in congestion pricingSections 2 and 3 have outlined the principles of congestion pricing when tolls can be set to match the external costs generated by each traveller. Such pricing is called …first-best‟congestion pri cing because it supports a first-best optimum in which roadsare used at maximum efficiency. Although useful as a theoretical benchmark, first-best pricing is increasingly recognized as of limited practical relevance. Attention has turned in the recent lit erature to more realistic types of …second-best‟ congestion pricing, in which various costs or constraints deter or prevent the setting of first-best tolls. Examples of second-best tolling include the use of toll-cordons around cities instead of tolling each road in the network, the use of step-tolls instead of smoothly time-varying tolls, tolling according to a fixed daily schedule rather than day-specific traffic conditions, etc. The rules for setting optimal second-best tolls are generally quite complicated because they must reflect all sorts of indirect effects,both good and bad.Evidence that congestion pricing may well produce adverse network effects is suggested by a recent study by May and Milne (2000). Using steady-state equilibrium simulations on a road network in Cambridge, UK, they compare congestion pricing with three other road pricing schemes: cordon pricing, time-based pricing, and distance-based pricing. The tolls considered were not second-best optimal tolls as described above, but various exogenously determined toll levels instead. All four schemes were found to be prone to adverse boundaryeffects, including “rat running” (where road users seek untolled routes). More discouragingly,a smaller percentage of travellers enjoyed travel time reductions with congestion pricing than with the other schemes. By inducing travellers to re-route to less congested roads, congestion pricing also had a tendency to increase travel distances —with potentially adverse environmental effects. These findings suggest that route-choice decisions deserve particular scrutiny in the design and evaluation of real-world congestion pricing projects. De Borger & Proost (2000) report on the relative efficiency of km-charges, fuel charges, parking charges and public transport pricing for different cities and countries, using the multi-modal TRENEN-model. They find that parking charges combined with cordons can achieve efficiencies of more than 70% of the first-best ideal in some cases, while the potential of fuel pricing and public transport pricing is rather limited.One consideration not addressed in these studies is the attitude of drivers toward tolling under uncertainty. It is unclear as yet from the limited formal research whether drivers are better off in terms of expected travel costs under nonresponsive or responsive pricing. Some surveys have found that drivers dislike uncertainty about how much they will have to pay in tolls. Aversion to uncertainty about payment was one of the reasons for opposition to the congestion metering project planned for Cambridge, England, in which vehicles would have been charged on the basis of actual congestion experienced. However, drivers have been receptive to the recent adoption of responsive pricing on Interstate I-15 north of San Diego. Further research is clearly called for on the economics and politics of road pricing under uncertainty.5. The social and political feasibility of congestion pricingDespite its economic appeal, road congestion pricing appears to enjoy little support outside academia. The limited social and, consequently, political support for congestion pricing has caused many proposed schemes to be abandoned beforeimplementation, or at least to be postponed (sometimes indefinitely). These include detailed plans for Hong Kong, London, The Randstad, and Stockholm (Small and Gómez-Ibáñez, 1998).One important reason for opposition to congestion pricing was identified in Section 2:before redistribution of toll revenues, everybody except the taxman appears to be worse off.This results should be qualified on two counts. First, if congestion takes the form of pure queuing and users have identical values of time, a fine toll leaves users equally well off Second, users with a high value of travel time may benefit from congestion pricing even before revenue recycling; see Section 3, Richardson (1974), and supporting empirical evidence from a Dutch survey by V erhoef et al. (1997a). Still, because value of time is positively correlated with income, this implies that road pricing is regressive —which is unlikely to improve the social acceptability of congestion pricing.According to economists, congestion pricing is the best instrument for controlling congestion. Y et the bulk of empirical evidence suggests that, even with cleverly designed tolling mechanisms and toll revenue allocation schemes, congestion pricing is likely to remain difficult to implement. It is no coincidence that the only area-wide congestion pricing scheme currently in operation is in Singapore, where the culture allows the government to implement unpopular policies. Indeed, Frick et al. (1996) infer from the series of failed attempts to implement congestion pricing on the San Francisco Bay Bridge that both the public and officials must be convinced that no feasible alternative to congestion pricing exists before it will be accepted.6. ConclusionGiven forecasts of continuing growth in road travel, and the reduced scope for expansion of road infrastructure, traffic congestion is not a problem that will go away soon. Recent advances in electronic vehicle identification and automated charging technologies have made congestion pricing a viable means of combating traffic congestion, rather than just an academic curiosum. This paper reviews the economic principles behind congestion pricing,which derive from the benefits of charging travellers for the externalities they create.Attention is paid to various complications that make simple textbook congestion pricing models of limited relevance, and dictate that congestion pricing schemes be studied from the perspective of the theory of the second best.Despite the economic case for congestion pricing, it has attracted strong social and political opposition, and assorted legal and institutional constraints create further barriers to implementation. It thus seems safe to conclude with the prediction that coming decades will witness an increasing number of attempts to implement congestion pricing, many of which will fail in their early stages, but some of which will succeed if only on a piecemeal basis. The design and evaluation of such schemes will probably require a deeper understanding of the direct and indirect impacts of congestion pricing than is available to date. One can hope, therefore, that this review will be obsolete before too long.ReferencesArnott, R., K. Arrow, A.B. Atkinson and J.H. Dreze (eds.) (1994). Public Economics: Selected Papers by William Vickrey. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Beckmann, M., C.B. McGuire and C.B. Winsten (1956). Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Y ale University Press, New Haven.Ben-Akiva, M., A. de Palma and I. Kaysi (1991). Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transportation Research A, 25A(5), 251-266.Bohm, P. (1987). Second best. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics V ol. 4, pp. 280-284.Macmillan, New Y ork.Bovenberg, A.L. and L.H. Goulder (1996). Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: a general equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings,86, 985-1000.Braess, D. (1968). Über ein Paradoxen des V erkehrsplanung. Unternehmenforschung, 12, 258-268.Braid, R.M. (1996). Peak-load pricing of a transportation route with an unpriced substitute. Journal of Urban Economics, 40, 179-197.Carey, M. and A. Srinivasan (1993). Externalities, average and marginal costs, and tolls on congested networks with time-varying flows. Operations Research, 41(1), 217-231.Catoni, S. and S. Pallottino (1991). Traffic equilibrium paradoxes. Transportation Science, 25, 240-244.Chander, P. and L. Leruth (1989). The optimal product mix for a monopolist in the presence of congestion effects. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7, 437-449.Chu, X. (1999). Alternative congestion pricing schedules. Regional Science and Urban Economics,29, 697-722.Dafermos, S. (1973). Toll patterns for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transportation Science, 7, 211-223.Daganzo, C.F. (1995). A Pareto optimum congestion reduction scheme. Transportation Research B,29B(2), 139-154.Daganzo, C.F. and R.C. Garcia (2000). A Pareto improving strategy for the time-dependent morningDe Borger, B. and S. Proost (eds.) (2000). Reforming Transport Pricing in the European Union. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (forthcoming).DeCorla-Souza, P. (2000). Making pricing of currently free highway lanes acceptable to the public.Transportation Quarterly, 54(3), 1-20.De Palma, A. and R. Lindsey (1998). Information and usage of congestible facilities under different pricing regimes. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31(3), 666-692.De V any, A. (1976). Uncertainty, waiting time, and capacity utilization: A stochastic theory of product quality. Journal of Political Economy, 84(3), 523-541.Edelson, N.E. (1971). Congestion tolls under monopoly. American Economic Review, 61(5), 872-882.Emmerink, R.H.M., P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld and K.W. Axhausen (1994). TheEconomics of motorist information systems revisited. Transport Reviews, 14(4), 363-388.Frick, K.T., S. Heminger and H. Dittmar (1996). Bay Bridge co ngestion-pricing project: lessons learned to date. Transportation Research Record, 1558, 29-38.Gómez-Ibáñez, J.A. and J.R. Meyer (1993). Going Private: The International Experience with Transport Privatization. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.Hall, W.R. (ed.) (1999). Handbook of Transportation Science. International Series in Operations Research and Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.Hau, T.D. (1998). Congestion pricing and road investment. In: Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility (K.J. Button and E.T. V erhoef,eds.), pp. 39-78. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Henderson, J.V. (1992). Peak shifting and cost-benefit miscalculations. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 103-121.Jones, P. (1998). Urban road pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation. In Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility (K.J. Button and E.T. V erhoef, eds.), pp. 263-284. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.Knight, F. (1924). Some fallacies in the interpretation of social costs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 38(4), 582-606.Laih, C-H. (1994). Queuing at a bottleneck with single- and multi-step tolls. Transportation Research A, 28A(3), 197-208.Lévy-Lambert, H. (1968). Tarification des services à qualitévariable: application aux péages decirculation. Econometrica, 36(3-4), 564-574.Lindsey, R. and E.T. V erhoef (2000). Congestion modelling. Forthcoming in: Handbook of Transport Modelling, V ol. 1. (D.A. Hensher and K.J. Button, eds.), Elsevier Science, Oxford.Liu, L.N. and J.F. McDonald (1998). Efficient congestion tolls in the presence of unpriced congestion: a peak and off-peak simulation model. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 352-366.Marchand, M. (1968). A note on optimal tolls in an imperfect environment. Econometrica, 36(3-4),575-581.May, A.D. and D.S. Milne (2000). Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance. Transportation Research A, 34A(6), 407-436.Mayeres, I. and S. Proost (1999). Marginal tax reform, externalities and income distribution. Working Paper, Centre for Economic Studies, Catholic University Leuven. Journal of Public Economics, forthcoming.Mills, D.E. (1981). Ownership arrangements and congestion-prone facilities. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 71(3), 493-502.Mohring, H. (1985). Profit maximization, cost minimization, and pricing for congestion-prone facilities. Logistics and Transportation Review, 21, 27-36.。