当前位置:文档之家› Development of a Colorimetric Sensor Array for the Discrimination

Development of a Colorimetric Sensor Array for the Discrimination

Subscriber access provided by XUZHOU NORMAL UNIV

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical

Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036

Article

Development of a Colorimetric Sensor Array for the Discrimination of Chinese Liquors Based on Selected Volatile Markers Determined by GC-MS Jun-jie Li, chun-xia Song, Junchang Hou, Danqun Huo, cai-

hong Shen, Xiaogang Luo, mei Yang, and huan-bao Fa

J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript ? DOI: 10.1021/jf503345z ? Publication Date (Web): 07 Oct 2014

Downloaded from https://www.doczj.com/doc/0b6113927.html, on October 8, 2014

Just Accepted

“Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted

online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical

Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the

dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts

appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been

fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all

readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI?). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered

to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published

in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just

Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor

changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers

and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors

or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Page 1 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Development of a Colorimetric Sensor Array for the Discrimination 1

of Chinese Liquors Based on Selected Volatile Markers Determined 2

by GC-MS

3

Jun-Jie Li a, Chun-Xia Song a, Chang-Jun Hou a*,Dan-Qun Huo a, Cai-Hong Shen b, 4

Xiao-Gang Luo a, Mei Yang a, and Huan-Bao Fa c

5

a Key Laboratory of Biorheology Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, 6

College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, PR China

7

b National Engineering Research Center of Solid-State Brewing, Luzhou Laojiao 8

Group Co.Ltd., Luzhou, Sichuan, 646000, PR China

9

c College of Chemistry an

d Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University,

10

Chongqing 400044, China

11

12

ABSTRACT

13

A brand-new colorimetric sensor array was developed to discrimination 12 high

14

alcoholic Chinese base liquor from Luzhou Co., Ltd. and 15 commercial Chinese 15

liquor of different brands as well as flavor types. 17 volatile compounds within four 16

chemical groups were determined as markers in the base liquor by GC-MS analysis 17

and Factor Analysis Method (FAM). A specialized colorimetric sensor array 18

composed of 20 sensitive dots were fabricated accordingly to obtain sensitive 19

interaction with different types of volatile markers. Discrimination of the liquor 20

samples was subsequently performed using chemometric and statistical methods, 21

including principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering analysis 22 Page 2 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 3 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(HCA). The results suggested that facile identification of either base liquors with

23

high alcoholic volume or commercial liquors of same flavor types could be achieved

24

by analysis of the color change profiles. The response of the sensor improved

25

significantly in comparison with those that rely on non-specific interactions, and no

26

mis-classi?cation was observed for both liquor samples using two chemometric

27

methods. Besides, it was also found that the discrimination is closely related to the

28

characteristic flavor compounds (esters, aldehydes and acids) and alcoholic strength

29

in liquors, its performance was even comparable with GC-MS.

30

31

KEYWORDS: Chinese liquor; colorimetric sensor array; GC-MS; chemometrics

32

33

INTRODUCTION

34

Chinese liquor, Baijiu in Chinese, is a popular alcoholic beverage in China and

35

many other countries. As one of the oldest distillates in the world, it has a history

36

over thousands of years, enjoys a long lasting popularity in China, and possesses an

37

irreplaceable position in traditional Chinese culture (1, 2). According to statistics,

38

annual consumption of Chinese liquor has been estimated to exceed 10 billion liters,

39

with a production over 7,000,000 tons merely in 2010 (3). Typically, Chinese liquor

40

is distilled after a complex fermentation process using cereals, mostly sorghum,

41

wheat, rice and corn. The solid-state fermentation is catalyzed by a natural mixed

42

saccharifying and fermenting agent called “Daqu”, which is abundant with

43

microorganisms including bacteria, yeast and fungi, and usually made from wheat or

44

a mixture of wheat, pea, and barley, and so on (2, 4). The fermented cereals are then

45

taken out to perform distillation to obtain raw liquor (base liquor). Freshly distilled 46

base liquor as well as young liquor has undesirable characteristics not preferable for 47

drinking (5). It needs to go through a long aging process, ranging from months to 48

years partly in accordance with final quality of product, to develop a well-balanced 49

“matured” liquor, and is finally blended by specialist to obtain commercial liquors of 50

unique flavor and taste (6).

51

Different raw materials and specialized brewing techniques lead to a variety of 52

flavor types, which also determine the quality grade of resultant Chinese liquors.

53

According to Liquor Association of China, Chinese liquor now can be divided into 54

ten main flavor types, that is, Luozhou-flavor (strong-flavor), Fen-flavor 55

(light-flavor), Maotai-flavor (sauce-flavor), rice-flavor, and other flavor type 56

(sesame-flavor, chicken-flavor, Medicine-flavor, Soy-flavor, Special-flavor, mixed 57

flavor and so on) (7). Daqu exerts the most significant impact on the flavor 58

appearance of liquors because the microbial community it contains are closely 59

associated with the degradation of raw materials, the production of alcohol, and the 60

formation of aromatic compounds (8-10). With respect to flavor type, brand and 61

geographical origin, the average price of Chinese liquors might vary from several to 62

thousand dollars on the market. Therefore, adulteration and counterfeit of famous 63

liquors to make higher profits has long presented an irritating problem in the liquor 64

industry. Besides, there is also an ever-increasing concern about the protection of 65

geographical indications (GIs) as a part of agricultural policy in both China and 66 Page 4 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 5 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

European countries (11, 12). Thus efficient and reliable discrimination of Chinese

67

liquors has important economic and cultural values.

68

Practically, oenophiles are employed to identify the aroma of liquors and

69

discriminate their differences in quality. But the results may be objective and

70

fluctuant due to a lot of psychological and/or physical reasons. Besides, it is difficult

71

for them to distinguish liquors belonging to similar flavor type, or forged liquors

72

produced by diluting industrial alcohol with water (13). In view of reliability,

73

accuracy and reproducibility, the most efficient analytical methods undoubtedly rest

74

on those depend on large equipment, including headspace solid-phase

75

micro-extraction gas chromatography (14), ambient glow discharge ionization mass

76

spectrometry (15), head space-solid phase micro-extraction-mass spectrometry (3,

77

16), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (1, 6), and infrared

78

spectroscopy (17-19). However, unevadable drawbacks such as complicated

79

pre-treatment, time-consuming procedures, requirement for professional operation

80

and also high cost, greatly hinder their application for in-situ real-time measurements

81

(7, 15, 20). Furthermore, due to complicated composition of ingredients in the liquor,

82

it is rather difficult to realize an accurate recognition of the overall characteristics of

83

hundreds of Chinese liquors through component-by-component analysis of

84

individual sample. Hence, it is of great significance to develop a rapid and reliable

85

method to realize convenient evaluation of the authenticity of Chinese liquor as well

86

as easy characterization of unique personality of each liquor sample.

87

Analysis methods based on sensory techniques, commonly referred to as

88

electronic nose or electronic tongue, have offered a powerful alternative to analyze 89

foodstuff in the recent years (20, 21). Treating the complicated mixed sample as a 90

single analyte, they are able to give a combined sensor response to the target thus 91

achieve fast yet efficient discrimination of those mixtures (13, 22). The challenge is 92

that those sensors required relatively complicate post pattern recognition methods to 93

collect feature information, and can hardly avoid signal overlap of closely similar 94

samples since they are usually lack of chemical discrimination (22-24). In view of 95

those shortcomings, the colorimetric sensor array outstands as a good candidate to 96

dress above-mentioned problems (25). Inspired by the mammalian gustatory and 97

olfactory systems, such sensor can give unique visible fingerprints to the complex 98

analytes in either the liquid phase or the head-gas (26, 27). Successful application of 99

colorimetric sensor arrays have been reported to distinguish drinks including beers 100

(28), soft drinks (26), coffees (29) and also Chinese liquors (12, 23). However, high 101

concentration of ethanol and water in high alcoholic Chinese liquors might not only 102

mask the response of other compounds, which contain more individual information 103

of the liquor rather than alcoholic strength, and also shorten the sensor life (30). 104

Besides, as most of the sensitive dots in the sensor array rely on non-specific 105

interactions such as Van der Waals interaction, Lewis acid-base interaction, π-π 106

interaction, and physical adsorption, efficient discrimination of liquor samples that 107

resemble closely in flavor and composition still remains a big challenge.

108

In the present study, we fabricated a new colorimetric sensor array based on 109

volatile markers determined by GC-MS to characterize Chinese liquor. Totally 17 110 Page 6 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 7 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

volatile markers was selected applying factor analysis to fabricate a 4×5sensor 111

array sensitive to different groups of markers. Data analysis was performed by PCA 112

and HCA to distinguish 12 base liquor samples and 15 commercial liquors. The main 113

focus of this study is to develop a reliable sensor to discriminate high alcoholic 114

liquors and to identify different commercial Chinese liquors of different brands and 115

flavor types. This effort develops a simple method that may prove to be useful for 116

the quality control of Chinese liquors in the market and even in mass production.

117

118

MATERIALS AND METHODS

119

Chemicals and Stock Solutions Preparation

120

All the 12 base Chinese liquors (listed in table S1) were kindly provided by 121

Luzhou laojiao Co. Ltd. (Luzhou, China) and 15 commercially available Chinese 122

liquors (listed in table S2) were purchased from local supermarket in Chongqing city, 123

China. 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-porphine, 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-porphine Indium, 124

5,10,15,20-tetrakis(penta-fluorophenyl)-porphyrin Iron(III) chloride, and 125

5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-porphine Zinc were obtained from Frontier Scientific (Logan, 126

UT, USA). All the other indicator dyes(see table S3) were supplied by 127

Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) and 128

ammonium ceric nitrate were purchased from Aladin Reagent (Shanghai, China).

129

Hydrochloric acid (HCl), sulphuric acid (H2SO4), NaOH, potassium persulfate, nitric 130

acid, absolute ethanol and other reagents of analytical pure were all obtained from 131

Chuandong Reagent (Chengdu, China). Porous hydrophilic membrane used for dye 132

staining was bought from Shanghai Minglie Chemical Engineering Science Co. Ltd. 133

(Shanghai, China). Ultra-pure water was generated by a Millipore Direct-Q Water 134

system (Molsheim, France). A PHS-3C pH detector (Shanghai Jingke Equipment, 135

Shanghai, China), ultrasonic atomizer apparatus (Shanghai Yuyue Medical 136

Equipment Company, Shanghai, China) and a Media microwave oven were used in 137

the study.

138

DNPH solution was prepared according to our previous study (31). To be 139

specific, 0.4 g DNPH was added to a mixed solution of 3 mL water and 10 mL 140

ethanol, and then 2 mL concentrated sulfuric acid was added dropwise. The solution 141

was stirred for 10 min and then went through filter paper to obtain a yellow DNPH 142

store solution. The prophyrin solutions were prepared using DMF solution and 143

stored in dark place before use. Marker solutions used for sensitive dot selection 144

were freshly prepared using mixed solution of absolute ethanol and deionized water 145

(60:40) upon detection. All other solutions without specification were prepared using 146

deionized water.

147

Analysis of Volatile Components in Base Liquors Using GC-MS

148

Agilent 5975I GC-MS with a 7683B automatic sampler was coupled with a FID 149

detector to analysis the volatile components in the 12 base Chinese liquors. Using a 150

Cross-linked silica capillary column (30 mm in length, 0.25 mm in inside diameter 151

and 0.25 μm in coating thickness), the initial column temperature was set at 40℃152

held for 2 min and then heated to 80℃with a rate of 5℃/min. It was lasted for 2 153

min and then heated to 260℃with a heating rate of 10℃/min, held for 10 min. 154 Page 8 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 9 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

High-purity nitrogen was applied as eluant gas using split sampling with a split ratio 155

of 30:1. The sample volume for GC was 1 μl and 2-5 μl for MS. Resultant data about 156

the volatile components were analyzed using a SPSS (version 18.0) software.

157

Fabrication of the Sensor Array

158

After determination of the volatile markers, sensitive dyes were subsequently 159

selected for each group of markers. A virtual library of possible combination for 160

different marker was first constructed according to former studies and our previous 161

study. Practically, taking the selection of sensitive dots for acidic markers as an 162

example, acetic acid solutions with a concentration of 0.4 g/L (average concentration 163

of 12 base liquor samples) were prepared using 60% ethanol (in deionized water) as 164

standard simulated samples. Since the pH of all the base liquors was detected 165

between 3.1 and 4.1, Congo red and bromophenol blue were selected as responsive 166

dyes. The mixture of dyes was kept in ultrasonic agitation for ten seconds and then a 167

quartz capillary was used to deliver approximately 0.1 μL solution onto the surface 168

of a porous hydrophilic membrane to fabricate a selection-oriented sensor array 169

(figure 1 A ). Once printed, the arrays were placed in a 500 ml beaker saturated in 170

nitrogen atmosphere for 30 min and subsequently dried in a 60℃oven for 24 h after 171

which the oven temperature was reduced to 35℃and the arrays left for another 24 h.

172

The image of the sensor array was captured before detection, 5 mL standard 173

simulated sample atomized with an ultrasonic atomizer apparatus was then sprayed 174

upon the array sealed with preservative film in petri plate (8 cm in diameter) and 175

lasted for at least 5 min before its image was taken finally. Comparing the images of 176

the array before and after exposure to the sample, color change profiles were 177

automatically obtained. Detailed working principle of the sensory system and data 178

process can be found in our former study (32). By analyzing resultant color change 179

(RGB) and the relative standard error of parallel dots, the combination and 180

concentration of the dyes in the sensitive dots were subsequently optimized. After 181

optimization of all the sensitive dots, the 4×5sensor array (see figure 1B) was 182

fabricated finally. The sensor arrays were subjected to above-mentioned preparing 183

procedure, and the arrays were stored in a nitrogen-flushed dark environment before 184

use.

185

Discrimination of the Liquor Samples

186

After fabrication of the sensor array, 12 base liquor samples and 15 commercial 187

Chinese liquors were analyzed subsequently. Briefly, 5 mL liquor sample was 188

atomized with an ultrasonic atomizer apparatus and then sprayed upon the array 189

sealed with preservative film in a petri plate (8 cm in diameter) and lasted for 1min. 190

Then, it was placed in the micro-wave oven and treated for 2 min (400 W, 60℃). 191

Data acquisition was performed with a routine procedure mentioned in previous 192

experiments and finally analyzed using the SPSS software. It should be noted that all 193

the detection of each sample, both liquor samples and simulated ones, was 194

performed repeatedly for at least five time, and the average images were used for 195

follow-up data analysis.

196

197

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

198 Page 10 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Selection of Markers

199 The composition of the volatile components analyzed by GC-MS of 12 base

200

liquors was listed in table 1. There were more than 30 volatile compounds existed in

201

those liquors and their concentration varied significantly in different samples. In

202

order to simplify data analysis, Factor Analysis Method was first applied to find the

203

principal components (PCs). Table 2 summarized the eigen values of the correlation

204

matrixes. As can be seen from the table, the first 10 components covered more than

205

99.8% of accumulative contribution rate dominated by the first three PCs. Then

206

maximum orthogonal rotation of the factor loading matrices was performed using

207

varimax method to find the relationship between the volatile compounds and the first

208

3 principal components. It was found that the first PC had closer positive

209

relationship with acetaldehyde, furfural, acetal, isoamylol, 2-butyl alcohol, n-propyl

210

alcohol, isobutanol, n-butanol, and isoamyl acetate. Those compounds were

211

normally regarded as the origin of taste (or mouthfeel) of with Chinese liquors. Since

212

ester compounds (ethyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl valerate, ethyl hexanoate and

213

ethyl lactate), which are important substance constitute the flavor of Chinese liquors

214

(33, 34), exhibited higher contribution rate to the second PC than other compounds,

215

we can assume that the second component mainly depends on the flavor composition.

216

For the third principal component, organic acid including acetic acid, butyric acid,

217

isopropylacetic acid and caproic acid dominated its cumulative load value. As a

218

result, totally 17 kinds of compounds were selected to serve as marker in the base

219

liquors, that is, acetaldehyde, furfural, acetal, isoamylol, 2-butyl alcohol, n-propyl

220

Page 11 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

alcohol, isobutanol, n-butanol, acetic acid, butyric acid, isopropylacetic acid, caproic

221

acid, ethyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl valerate, ethyl hexanoate and ethyl lactate.

222

We subsequently re-analyzed the 12 base liquors (each with five control samples)

223

using only the concentration information of the selected markers to testify whether it

224

can discriminate the 60 base liquor sample. As expected, PCA and HCA all showed

225

correct discrimination of the liquors directly use concentration information of

226

selected 17 markers (figure 2B and C). Most importantly, the factor analysis result

227

resemble closely with that obtained from all the volatile compounds, which again

228

demonstrated the feasibility of selected 17 volatile compounds to distinguish the

229

base liquor samples.

230

Fabrication of the Sensor Array

231 Successful discrimination of Chinese liquors using sensory techniques have

232

been reported by our group and other groups previously (7, 12, 20). Since those

233

studies either rely on complex post data analysis or non-specific interaction between

234

sensing materials and liquors sample, it still remains a big challenge to realize

235

in-depth recognition of each kind of Chinese liquors with respect to raw materials in

236

production, brewing techniques and even storage methods. In view of these

237

problems, we endeavored to develop an easy yet efficient sensor to discriminate

238

Chinese liquor using volatile makers selected for the base liquors. Despite the

239

complexity of selected 17 markers, they can be classified into four groups, including

240

alcohol, acid, ester and aldehyde. So it is not unreasonable to discriminate those

241

liquors based on responsive materials sensitive to organic alcohol, acid, ester and

242

Page 12 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 13 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

243

aldehyde. Considering that all the sensitive dots are selected and fabricated in a 244

similar way, we here choose dot D12 (specific to alcohol) to illustrate the procedure 245

to fabricate individual sensitive dots. Typically, when certain combination of the 246

dyes were selected, it was used to make a selection-oriented sensor array which was 247

then used to test simulated standard samples. We use Euclidean Distance change 248

(root of the sum of ?R2, ?G2 and ?B2 of each sensor dot) to measure the response.

249

As can be seen form figure S1A, different combination of the dyes showed varied 250

responses and higher responses were observed when the ratio were set at 4:1 and 3:1.

251

And we finally chose 3:1 as optimized ratio to obtain high stability of resultant 252

sensitive dot because it showed the lowest RSD (figure S1B). Finally, totally 20 253

combinations were selected as sensor dots (see table S3 for detailed information).

254

Specifically, D11 to D15 were specific to organic alcohols, D21 to D23 were specific 255

to esters (catalyzed by micro-wave), D24, D25 and D31 were specific to acid via 256

acid-base reactions (see figure S2), and the rest were specific to aldehydes, the 257

detection mechanism of which was explained in details in our former study (31).

Discrimination of the Base Liquors with High Alcoholic Strength

258

60 base wine samples (5 controls for each kind of base Chinese liquor) were

259

then selected to test the recognition ability of the newly developed colorimetric 260

sensor array. We first studied the time-dependent response of the sensor after its 261

interaction with the liquors samples. Figure 3 shows that Euclidean distance of all 262

the sample increased until they reached to equilibrium in 4 min. It indicates that 4 263

min is longer enough for the interaction to establish an equilibrium. The colorful 264

profiles of the based liquors in figure 4A demonstrated that different base liquors 265

showed significant difference which can even be differentiated by naked eyes. When 266

analyzing individual sensor dots, we found that sample BL-4 (72% in alcoholic 267

strength) and BL-5 (72.1% in alcoholic strength) exhibited similar colorimetric 268

responses in D11 and D12, specific to alcohols with low molecular weight (mostly 269

ethanol), but completely different in other sensitive dots. It suggested that difference 270

in alcoholic strength did not conceal the colorimetric response of the sensor array. 271

Besides, the responses of D11 and D12 in BL-4 and BL-5 were clearly different 272

from other samples (even BL-10 with an alcoholic strength of 71.4%), indicating 273

that the sensor had fine discrimination of alcoholic strength.

274

Statistical analysis of the data was applied to get further understanding of the 275

interaction between the sensor and the base liquors. The cumulative load values of 276

individual dot for the first 3 principal components, which cover over 70% of the 277

cumulative contribution rate, were list in table S4. The results suggested that the first 278

one mainly relied on discrimination of esters, the second relied on aldehydes and the 279

third greatly on organic acids, which is partly consistent with that analyzed by the 280

GC-MS. Results of the first two principal components were plotted in figure 4B, the 281

successful classification of different base liquor samples is indicative the good 282

discrimination ability of the sensor array. Moreover, correct clustering of the 60 283

samples by HCA further proved the sensor of excellent performance to screen among 284

different base liquors (figure 4C), and it also realized almost the same grouping of 285

the samples with that by GC-MS analysis (figure 2C), demonstrating its 286 Page 14 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 15 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

discriminating ability comparable with that of GC-MS to some extent. Therefore, we 287

can conclude that the colorimetric sensor developed in the present study have good 288

performance to distinguish different base Chinese liquors and the recognition is 289

based on the combination of specific affinity of individual sensitive dots to volatile 290

markers, which constitute the specificity of different liquors, including alcohols, 291

esters, acids and aldehydes.

292

Discrimination of 15 Commercial Liquors

293

Lastly, the colorimetric sensor was applied to common Chinese liquors that are 294

commercially available in the supermarket. The colorimetric maps of selected 15 295

kinds of Chinese liquors are shown in figure 5A. It can be seen from the figure that 296

different brands of Chinese liquors exhibited different response in the sensor array 297

and the difference can also be distinguished by naked eyes. Similar to that of the 298

base liquors, liquor samples of the same alcoholic strength showed analogous 299

colorimetric responses in D11 and D12 and were hardly alike in other dots, which is 300

again verified it immune to high ethanol interfering. Plot of the first two principal 301

components was shown in figure 5A demonstrated again the good recognition of the 302

commercial Chinese liquors. PCA study also suggested that the first PC mostly 303

relied on discrimination of esters and aldehydes. The second one mainly relied on 304

organic acids and the third greatly on alcohols, which is slight different from base 305

liquors. Moreover, the cumulative contribution rate (65.6%) of the first three 306

principal components for the commercial liquor was lower than that of the base 307

liquors. It might resulted from of the change of marker compounds in liquor aging 308

process of the commercial Chinese liquor by base liquor as well as its storage (35). 309

HCA study was also used to analyzed the data (R, G and B value of each dot 310

and Euclidean distance) obtained from colorimetric reaction. It was found that 311

control samples of the same brand clustered together without any mis-classification, 312

and different liquors of the same flavor type grouped together firstly then with other 313

ones. However, samples of the same alcoholic strength did not cluster close with 314

each other in the dendrogram. Those results suggested that discrimination of the 315

Chinese liquors but the sensor array was dominated by the favor types, relying on 316

esters and aldehydes, instead of alcoholic strength. Moreover, we also compared the 317

colorimetric response of the present sensor with that depend on cross-responsive 318

mechanism by non-specific interactions in former studies (figure 6). It showed that 319

the present one exhibited significant better response to selected Chinese liquor 320

samples, and the Euclidean distance were much higher than the former, despite that 321

the former one had more sensitive dots.

322

In summary, facile discrimination of 12 high alcoholic Chinese base liquor from 323

Luzhou Co., Ltd. and 15 commercial Chinese liquor of different brands and flavor 324

types was achieved with a freshly developed colorimetric sensor array. Based on 17 325

volatile markers determined by GC-MS analysis and subsequent Factor Analysis 326

including acetaldehyde, furfural, acetal, isoamylol, 2-butyl alcohol, n-propyl alcohol, 327

isobutanol, n-butanol, acetic acid, butyric acid, isopropylacetic acid, caproic acid, 328

ethyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl valerate, ethyl hexanoate and ethyl lactate, the 329

sensor realized correct identification of both base liquors with high alcoholic volume 330 Page 16 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 17 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

and commercial liquors within the same flavor type just by comparison of the color 331

change profiles. Statistical analysis including PCA and HCA suggested that no 332

mis-classi?cation was observed for both liquor samples, and the discrimination had a 333

close relationship with the characteristic flavor compounds (esters, aldehydes and 334

acids) and alcoholic strength in the liquors. Since the response of the sensor array 335

improved significantly in comparison with those that rely on non-specific 336

interactions and its discrimination ability was partly comparable with GC-MS, we 337

can envisage its potential application for quality surveillance of Chinese liquors in 338

the market and even in mass production.

339

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*Phone: +862365112673; fax: +862365102507.

E-mail address: houcj@https://www.doczj.com/doc/0b6113927.html, (D. Hou).

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation (No.81171414, 81271930 and 31171684), Key Technologies R&D Program of Sichuan Province of China (2013FZ0043 and 2010NZ0093), Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2012BAI19B03) and Sharing fund of Chongqing University’s large equipment.

Supporting Information Available:

Detailed information about 12 base Chinese liquors and 15 commercial Chinese liquors, composition of each sensor dots, and other information can be found in the Supporting Materials. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at https://www.doczj.com/doc/0b6113927.html,

REFERENCES

1. Xiao, Z.; Yu, D.; Niu, Y.; Chen, F.; Song, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, G., Characterization of aroma Page 18 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 19 of 33Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

compounds of Chinese famous liquors by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and flash GC

electronic-nose. Journal of Chromatography B2014, 945–946, (0), 92 - 100.

2. Du, H.; Fan, W.; Xu, Y., Characterization of Geosmin as Source of Earthy Odor in Different

Aroma Type Chinese Liquors. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry2011, 59, (15), 8331-8337.

3. Cheng, P.; Fan, W.; Xu, Y., Determination of Chinese liquors from different geographic origins

by combination of mass spectrometry and chemometric technique. Food Control2014, 35, (1), 153 -

158.

4. Du, H.; Lu, H.; Xu, Y.; Du, X., Community of Environmental Streptomyces Related to Geosmin

Development in Chinese Liquors. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry2013,61, (6),

1343-1348.

5. Fan, W.; Qian, M. C., Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography?

Olfactometry Dilution Analysis of Young and Aged Chinese“Yanghe Daqu”Liquors. Journal of

Agricultural and Food Chemistry2005, 53, (20), 7931-7938.

6. Zheng, J.; Liang, R.; Wu, C.; Zhou, R.; Liao, X., Discrimination of different kinds of

Luzhou-flavor raw liquors based on their volatile features. Food Research International2014, 56, (0),

77 - 84.

7. Liu, M.; Han, X.; Tu, K.; Pan, L.; Tu, J.; Tang, L.; Liu, P.; Zhan, G.; Zhong, Q.; Xiong, Z.,

Application of electronic nose in Chinese spirits quality control and flavour assessment. Food Control

2012, 26, (2), 564 - 570.

8. Wang, C.; Shi, D.; Gong, G., Microorganisms in Daqu: a starter culture of Chinese Maotai-flavor

liquor. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology2008, 24, (10), 2183--2190.

9. Wu, X.; Zheng, X.; Han, B.; Vervoort, J.; Nout, M. J. R., Characterization of Chinese Liquor

相关主题
文本预览
相关文档 最新文档