SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板
修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）
List of Resp on ses
Dear Editors and Reviewers:
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers' comments concerning our
manuscript entitled “Paper Title” （ID: 文章稿号）.Those comments are all valuable
and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important
guidi ng sig nifica nee to our researches. We have studied comme nts carefully and have
made correcti on which we hope meet with approval. Revised porti on are marked in
red in the paper. The main corretions in the paper and the responds to the reviewer ' s comme nts are as flow ing:
Responds to the reviewer ' s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment:•（••••简要列出意见.. ）
Respo nse:核xxx
2. Response to comment:•（••••简要歹U出意见）
Respo nse:核xxx
0 0 0 0 0 0
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：
We are very sorry for our n eglige nee of ...... .
We are very sorry for our in correct writ ing
It is really true as Reviewer suggested that
We have made correct ion accord ing to the Reviewer
s comme nts.
We have rewritten this part according to the Reviewer ' s suggestion
As Reviewer suggested that .............
Considering the Reviewer ' s suggestion, we have ...............
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：
Special tha nks to you for your good comme nts.
Reviewer #2:
同上述
Reviewer #3:
xxxxxx
Other cha nges:
1. Li ne 60-61, the stateme nts of “ .... ”were corrected as
2. Li ne 107, “……”was added
3. Li ne 129, “……”was deleted
xxxxxx
We tried our best to improve the manu script and made some cha nges in the manu script. These cha nges will not in flue nee the content and framework of the paper. And here we did no t list the cha nges but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that the correct ion will meet with approval.
Once aga in, tha nk you very much for your comme nts and suggesti ons
以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。与大家分享
从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。这些意见
分布在文章的各个地方。我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。看到这些意见，
我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高文章的质量。
从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。
对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。
记得ACS Style Guide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，
这
也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。
因此：有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。
Reviewers' comme nts:
Reviewer #3: While revis ing the script, it is to be suggested that author should clearly indicate the aim & scope of the study and while making conclusion, it is to be mentioned how the study is useful for the practical purposes. In addition the following are the few suggesti on s/comme nts, which may be in cluded while revisio n.
1. Introduction part first para last line, author must avoid to write ambiguous statement i.e., much work is still ahead, may indicate properly.
