HND人力资源报告

  • 格式:doc
  • 大小:101.00 KB
  • 文档页数:12

下载文档原格式

  / 12
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

文档来源为:从网络收集整理.word版本可编辑.欢迎下载支持. Report for Manageing People and Organisation (DDE3D34)

Outcome 4

The Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd and the accomplishment of the new merger company

Candidate name:

Grade and Class:Financial services 2010

Student ID:

1.0 Introduction (3)

2.0 Literature Review (4)

2.1 Flat structure (4)

2.2 Centralised structure & Decentralised structure (4)

2.3 Shamrock structure (or Hybrid structure based on a line project team

approach) (5)

2.4 Contigency Approach (6)

2.5 Line, Staff, function and lateral relationship (7)

2.6 Authority, Responsibility and Delegation (8)

3.0 Case study (8)

3.1 Background of Barbour Brow Engeneering Ltd (8)

3.2 Solutions of current situations (9)

3.2.1 Suggested Organisation Structure (9)

3.2.2 Contigency Approach (10)

3.2.3 Relationship within Proposed New Structure (11)

3.2.4 Authority, Responsibility and Delegation within New Structure (11)

4.0 Conclusion (12)

5.0 Reference (12)

1.0 Introduction

Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd was no defined structure. The company was built by Neil and David. To start with the company had seven people, Neil, David, Jack and James. In addition, there had three technicians. In the company, for products, they should was to provide a high quality service. For staff, the leaders made the staff were trained in the technology. In addition, David had used the timesheets to staff.

In Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd, have more work achievements in the fourteen years. Neil being able to rely on the service of John’s firm had been a major benefit in gaining contracts, because this increased the firm’s ability to ensure a high quality of service during the development stage of projects. Their staff were trained in the latest technology. This enabled the firm to produce the designs to a high specification as efficiently as possible.

In Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd, the internal was not in combination with the external, is an open question in the company. The company to cooperate with the John Colbert Civil Engineering Contractors was very successful in the four years. Because Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd have more benefits. The firm had reputations for high quality work. John Colbert Civil Engineering Contractor s’ boss, John was old. The company had approached with Neil about a merger.

So Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd should re-structure with John Colbert Civil Engineering Contractors. Re-structure is best opportunity to Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd.