HND人力资源报告
- 格式:doc
- 大小:101.00 KB
- 文档页数:12
文档来源为:从网络收集整理.word版本可编辑.欢迎下载支持. Report for Manageing People and Organisation (DDE3D34)
Outcome 4
The Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd and the accomplishment of the new merger company
Candidate name:
Grade and Class:Financial services 2010
Student ID:
1.0 Introduction (3)
2.0 Literature Review (4)
2.1 Flat structure (4)
2.2 Centralised structure & Decentralised structure (4)
2.3 Shamrock structure (or Hybrid structure based on a line project team
approach) (5)
2.4 Contigency Approach (6)
2.5 Line, Staff, function and lateral relationship (7)
2.6 Authority, Responsibility and Delegation (8)
3.0 Case study (8)
3.1 Background of Barbour Brow Engeneering Ltd (8)
3.2 Solutions of current situations (9)
3.2.1 Suggested Organisation Structure (9)
3.2.2 Contigency Approach (10)
3.2.3 Relationship within Proposed New Structure (11)
3.2.4 Authority, Responsibility and Delegation within New Structure (11)
4.0 Conclusion (12)
5.0 Reference (12)
1.0 Introduction
Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd was no defined structure. The company was built by Neil and David. To start with the company had seven people, Neil, David, Jack and James. In addition, there had three technicians. In the company, for products, they should was to provide a high quality service. For staff, the leaders made the staff were trained in the technology. In addition, David had used the timesheets to staff.
In Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd, have more work achievements in the fourteen years. Neil being able to rely on the service of John’s firm had been a major benefit in gaining contracts, because this increased the firm’s ability to ensure a high quality of service during the development stage of projects. Their staff were trained in the latest technology. This enabled the firm to produce the designs to a high specification as efficiently as possible.
In Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd, the internal was not in combination with the external, is an open question in the company. The company to cooperate with the John Colbert Civil Engineering Contractors was very successful in the four years. Because Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd have more benefits. The firm had reputations for high quality work. John Colbert Civil Engineering Contractor s’ boss, John was old. The company had approached with Neil about a merger.
So Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd should re-structure with John Colbert Civil Engineering Contractors. Re-structure is best opportunity to Barbour Brown Engineering Ltd.