下载文档原格式
英语辩论赛常用词汇和表达辩论赛English debating Competition辩论赛事debating event主办host\manage正方pro side反方con side一辩：first debater二辩：second debater对方辩友: my fellow debaters正方一辩the first debater of pro side反方一辩the second debater of con side计时员timekeeper评委打分score the competition英语辩论赛常用语:定义要合理the definition should be reasonable素材要有说服力matter should be persuasive没有平局there is no draws in competitive competition开始的陈词，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进行假设：According to your logic, you are missing the pointYou know what? You are straying from the main pointYou are generalizing what I asked你在以偏盖全A征求他人观点或意见的用语I would be glad to hear your opinion of 我很乐意听听你对……的意见。
Are you of the same opinion as I? 你与我的看法一致吗？I was wondering where you stood on the question of 我想知道你, 对……问题怎么看。
B引入自己的新观点或看法的用语Another point is that 另一点是……Another way of looking at it is 看这个问题的另一个看法是……I forgot to say / tell you that 我忘记要讲…C就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语That’s all I want to say. 我想说的就这些了。
Kangaroo trouble：kill or not kill——一节英语报刊课的辩论赛【案例背景】为了丰富小学高年级学生英语阅读的素材，拓宽他们英语学习的知识面，提高他们英语语用的能力，我坚持定期给学生开设英语报刊课。
这次报刊课的主题是：Kangaroo trouble：kill or not kill.原本只想通过这个话题，让学生多元化的了解澳大利亚这一国家的风俗，进而了解袋鼠这一物种的一些基本信息。
可没那想到，学生对这个话题本身，产生了浓厚的兴趣和两极化的思路。
我们知道，英语学科的核心素养包括语言能力、思维品质、文化品格和学习能力四个维度。
其中思维品质是思考辨析能力，包括分析、推理、判断、理性表达、用英语进行多元思维等活动。
而最难落实的恰恰就是思维品质。
我就是利用这一契机，让学生在这一课堂中，用辩论的思维展现自我。
【案例描述】辩论前：教案设计一、Brainstorm：What do you know about kangaroo?Which country has the most kangaroos in the world?（In Australia, people see kangaroos everywhere.）二、All about kangaroosWhere and how do they live?1.Kangaroos like to live in the bush.2.They live in groups and help each other.What do they eat?They eat grass, leaves and insects too.What can they do?1. Jump2. Kangaroos are good swimmers.三、All about kangaroo babyThe mother kangaroo has a _______for a baby kangaroo. A new born kangaroo is very______. It is as big as a______. After its birth, it climbs into its mother’s pouch. It leaves the pouch when it is _____months old.四、Let’s learn1.Do you like kangaroos?Kangaroos are part of the life of Australians. People love them.2.How does Chris （a kangaroo-lover）love kangaroos?3.How do people keep kangaroos away from cars?五、Let’s thinkWhat will happen if there are more and more kangaroos in Australia?六、Let’s discussThere are more kangaroos than people in this country.Is this good or bad?七、Let’s knowKangaroos eat lots of grass on grasslands. Grasslands are home to birds and reptiles. Kangaroos are doing harm to the homes of those animals.What can people do? Kill?八、Let’s debateWhat is your opinion?Killing animals is not vey nice. But this plan will save lots of other kinds of animals.1. They eat grass and keep the grass short. Not as many fires start if the grass is short.2. Kangaroos could disappear because of this plan.正反方辩论：以下记录学生的辩论过程，材料略作整理。
辩论稿作文范文高中英语Ladies and Gentlemen,Today, I stand before you to present a persuasive argument on the significance of embracing technology in education as a crucial tool for the modern student. The title of my debate is "The Indispensable Role of Technology in Shaping the Future of Education."Introduction:In an era where information is at our fingertips, the integration of technology in education is not just a trend but a necessity. It is a catalyst for enhancing learning experiences, fostering critical thinking, and preparing students for the challenges of the 21st century.Body Paragraph 1 - Enhancing Learning Experiences:The first point I would like to address is how technology can enrich the learning experience. With the advent ofinteractive whiteboards, educational apps, and online resources, students are no longer passive recipients of knowledge. They are active participants in their own learning process. For instance, virtual reality can transport students to the depths of the ocean or the surface of Mars, providing an immersive experience that traditional textbooks cannot match.Body Paragraph 2 - Fostering Critical Thinking:Secondly, technology is instrumental in developing critical thinking skills. Through programming and computational thinking, students learn to solve complex problems by breaking them down into manageable parts. This approach not only aids in understanding abstract concepts but also encourages creativity and innovation.Body Paragraph 3 - Preparing for the Future:Moreover, as we prepare our students for a future that is increasingly reliant on digital literacy, it is imperative that they become proficient in using technology. The ability to navigate digital platforms, understand data, and communicate effectively through various mediums is no longer a luxury but a requirement for success in the global marketplace.Conclusion:In conclusion, technology is not an optional extra in education; it is an essential component that must be leveraged to equip our students with the skills they need to thrive. It is our responsibility as educators to facilitate access to technology and to guide our students in its ethical and effective use. By doing so, we are not just teaching them about technology; we are teaching them to use technology as a tool to change the world.Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to an engaging discussion on this topic.This debate speech is structured to provide a clear and concise argument for the importance of technology in education, with a focus on enhancing learning experiences, fostering critical thinking, and preparing students for future challenges. It is designed to be persuasive and to encourage the audience to consider the benefits of integrating technology into educational practices.。
英语辩论赛常用词汇和表达法汇总辩论赛English debating Competition辩论赛事debating event主办host\manage议会制辩论形式preliamentary debating style循环赛preliminary debate淘汰赛elimination debate八分之一决赛octofinals四分之一决赛quarterfinals半决赛semifinals决赛grand final正方pro side反方con side正方一辩the first debater of pro side反方一辩the second debater of con side计时员timekeeper评委打分score the competition定义要合理the definition should be reasonable素材要有说服力matter should be persuasive没有平局there is no draws in competitive commpetition一辩：first debater二辩：second debater对方辩友，my fellow debaters开始的陈词，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进行假设：according to your logicYou are missing the point！（你没有说重点！你没有围绕中心！即，他在钻洞子，这个时候他很有可能会说漏。
注意，要用are，不能说成You're，因为这样语气，士气就没有了。
）You just don't understand what we talked about！（你根本就没有明白我们刚说了什么！即：误解了，曲解了）You know what? You are straying from the main point！你知道吗？你已经跑题了！（也要注意，都用You are）自由辩论的阶段，可以在他在说的时候，插进去，说“Wait！Wait！You just said……，did you？”（当然这句话要用在，你发现对方说的不正确时~~）You are generalizing what I asked！(你在以偏盖全！即：我要你回答这个，但对方你绕过去了！)Please ask my question！（请不要回避我的问题！请你回答！！）英语辩论赛常用语A征求他人观点或意见的用语I would be glad to hear your opinion of …我很乐意听听你对……的意见。
英语辩论赛的准备方法英语辩论赛是一项能够锻炼学生语言表达能力、思辨能力及团队合作能力的活动，也是中学生活中一个丰富多彩的经历。
但是，如何准备一场英语辩论赛呢？下面就让我来分享一些经验。
首先，了解赛制。
英语辩论赛通常分为基础组和高级组，和三人制和四人制。
比赛的主题也有所不同，例如社会问题、教育问题、环境问题等。
了解赛制和主题后，可以针对性地准备相关的知识储备和语言素材。
其次，深入研究所选的辩题。
辩论赛的主旨是通过正反双方的论述、互相驳斥和提供证据来决定一个问题。
因此，我们需要对选定的辩题进行深入研究。
可以通过网络、图书馆等途径来收集相关的材料和信息，并加以分析和总结。
同时，要注意收集对手的观点和证据，以便在赛场上有针对性地进行反驳。
第三，准备辩论框架。
辩论框架是整个辩论的基础，包括开场白、正方和反方的主要观点、证据和反驳等。
在制定辩论框架时，要考虑各方主要观点和思路，结合所掌握的信息和语言素材来制定。
可以通过模拟练习，不断完善和调整辩论框架。
第四，加强英语表达能力。
英语辩论赛要求选手具有较好的英语表达能力，包括语音、语调、语法、词汇等方面。
因此，在准备过程中，可以加强英语听、说、读、写的练习，提高自己的英语水平。
同时，也可以通过模拟辩论、口语训练等方式来加强口语表达能力。
最后，加强团队合作。
英语辩论赛是一个团队活动，需要每个队员充分发挥自己的长处，协同合作，共同完成比赛任务。
因此，在准备过程中，要充分沟通和协作，分工合作，互相支持和鼓励，共同进步。
以上是准备英语辩论赛的一些方法和建议。
希望能够对大家有所帮助，也希望广大中学生能够通过参加英语辩论赛来提高自己的英语水平和思辨能力，收获更多的人生经历。
附件1：西北民族大学第二届英语辩论赛暨第十六届“外研社·亚马逊杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛校内选拔赛辩手职责与评分准则Speaker RolesEach speaker has a role and each speech has a specific purpose. The descriptions of speaker roles listed below are suggestive and are not intended to be exhaustive or exclusive. All speakers, except the final speakers for the Proposition and Opposition (Proposition and Opposition Whips), should introduce new material. All debaters should refute the opposing teams’ arguments, except the Prime Minister.辩手职责每位辩手需在辩论中各司其职。
除正反方最后一名辩手（内阁党鞭和反对党党鞭）外，所有的辩手都应引入新内容。
除正方一辩（首相）外，所有辩手都应进行反驳。
评委将根据各队论点的有力程度为各辩手评分，而不能单凭其完成自己职责的程度评分。
Speaker Points GuidelinesTeams should be ranked on the basis of their matter and manner.Matter refers to the content and substance of a team’s arguments. Matter includes arguments and reasoning, evidence, examples, case studies, facts, statistics and any other material that a team uses to further the case. Matter includes both positive (or substantive) material and refutation (arguments specifically aimed to counter the arguments of the opposing team(s)).Matter should be relevant, logical and consistent. It should relate to the issues of the debate: positive material should support the case being presented and refutation should engage the material presented by the opposing team(s). Arguments should be developed logically in order to be clear and well reasoned and therefore plausible. The conclusion of all arguments should support the member’s case. Members should ensure that the matter they present is consistent within their speech, their team and the remainder of the members on their side of the debate. All members should present positive matter (except the final two members in the debate) and all members should engage in refutation (except the first member in the debate). The Government Whip may choose to present positive matter if it is relevant to refuting the Member of the Opposition’s extension.Manner refers to the strategy and presentation of a team’s arguments. Manner includes elements such as argument choice, speech structure, vocal and physical delivery, use of POIs, and so forth.Manner should enhance the team’s effort to prove or disprove th e motion and should be compelling. To enhance their effort, the team should appropriately prioritize and apportion time to the dynamic issues of the debate, present their arguments in an order that is clear and logical, engage the arguments of the opposing side through direct or indirect refutation. Compelling manner is that which presents the material in a way that demonstrates a concern for vocal and physical presentation. Compelling teams deliver arguments with appropriate levels of passion, present their material in a way that attends to appropriate vocal and physical delivery, and avoid behaviors that detract from the force and effectiveness of their arguments.This description of matter and manner is necessarily incomplete. The adjudication panel should assess the totality of each team’s efforts (including, but not limited to, matter and manner) to achieve a just and fair decision.After the adjudicators have agreed upon the ranking for each team, the panel should determine the speaker scores for each debater. Individual speaker scores should be assigned as follows, where a score of 75 would reflect an average effort at the tournament.The aggregate of the two team members’ individual speaker scores will comprise their team’s team score. Ea ch team must receive a team score appropriate to their rank in the debate; no “low point wins” may be assigned. For example, if the 2nd place team in the round is assigned an aggregate team score of 170 points, the 1st place team must receive at least 171 aggregate points. Ties in team scores are not permitted.评分准则评委主要根据选手在素材(Matter)和辩论风格及策略(Manner)两方面的表现打分。
第1篇一、背景介绍语言作为人类沟通的工具，不仅是信息的载体，也是文化传承的媒介。
在人类文明的发展过程中，语言与思维的关系一直备受关注。
一种观点认为，语言是思维的工具，语言决定思维；另一种观点则认为，思维独立于语言，语言只是思维的表述形式。
本辩论赛旨在探讨语言与思维之间的关系，深入分析语言是否影响思维。
二、正方观点：语言影响思维1. 语言是思维的载体正方认为，语言是思维的载体，是人类表达、交流思想的重要工具。
语言中蕴含着丰富的文化内涵和逻辑结构，对思维的形成和发展具有深刻影响。
（1）语言影响思维的方向不同的语言体系在词汇、语法、句法等方面存在差异，这些差异直接影响了人们的思维方式。
例如，汉语和英语在表达方式上存在很大差异，汉语注重意境，而英语注重逻辑。
这种差异导致两种语言的使用者在思维方式上也有所不同。
（2）语言影响思维的深度语言中的词汇和句式结构具有一定的逻辑性，这种逻辑性有助于人们进行深入思考。
例如，汉语中的“辩证法”强调对立统一，有助于人们从多角度思考问题。
而英语中的“因果关系”则促使人们注重分析问题的原因和结果。
2. 语言影响思维的方式语言不仅是表达思想的工具，还能影响人们的思维方式。
以下从三个方面进行阐述：（1）语言影响思维的习惯人们在使用语言的过程中，会形成一定的语言习惯，这种习惯会潜移默化地影响思维方式。
例如，汉语中强调“关系”和“面子”，导致人们在处理问题时更注重人际关系和面子问题。
（2）语言影响思维的逻辑性不同的语言体系在逻辑结构上存在差异，这种差异会影响人们的思维逻辑。
例如，汉语中的“推论”往往从具体事例出发，而英语中的“演绎”则从一般原理出发。
（3）语言影响思维的创造性语言中的词汇和句式结构具有一定的创造性，这种创造性有助于激发人们的思维。
例如，汉语中的“成语”和“典故”等，为人们的思维提供了丰富的素材。
三、反方观点：思维独立于语言1. 思维是人类天生的能力反方认为，思维是人类天生的能力，与语言无关。
英国议会制辩论及其对高校英语教学的启示2009-11-04 23:36:05 作者：任亮娥绍兴文理学院外国语学院来源：绍兴文理学院学报浏览次数：217 网友评论0 条中图分类号：G642.41 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1008-293X(2008)11- 0062- 041.引言 ^20世纪80年代中期，北京大学代表中国高校参加了新加坡创办的亚洲大专辩论赛后，大学生辩论赛开始风靡全国，各种形式的国内国际辩论赛开始层出不穷,许多高校成立.了辩论协会，为大学生搭建了展现自我、交流思想、追求真理、探索问题、关注社会热点的平台.成为大学校园中一项学生乐于参加的校园文化活动。
在普遍开展的辩论活动中，英语辩论赛也越来越受3高等院校的重视。
目前国家级与国际级英语辩论赛有"外研社杯"全国英语辩论赛（FLTRP Cup Nat ional Debate Tournamsnt)、亚洲大专英语辩论赛(Asian University Debate Championshi ps)、全亚校际辩论锦标赛(All-Asians Intervarsity Debate Championships)、世界大学英语辩论赛（Wetld Uni versity Debate Cham p ionships)、国际辩论教育协会英语辩论赛（International Debate Education Associat ion简禾尔IDEA)。
"外研社"杯英语辩论赛创办于1997年，现已成功举办了十届，是目前全国规模最大、水平最高的英语辩论赛。
这一活动的开展促进了我国高校的外语教学，也激发了广大高校学生的外语学习兴趣，加强了校际间的广泛交流与合作，对于培养大学生的良好素质具有许多积极的意义。
近年来，外研社组织优胜选手参加了三届世界大学生辩论赛(WUDC)，这标志着我国高校与国际间高校的交流和合作拉开了序幕，而且在2007年1月加拿大温哥华第27届世界大学英语辩论赛中，第十届"外研社"杯全国英语辩论赛亚军身份参赛的清华大学代表队经过几轮鏖战，一举夺得组(英语作为一种外语)冠军，这更加鼓舞着我国英语学习者的热情。
英语辩论赛常用词汇和表达法汇总辩论赛English debating Competition辩论赛事debating event主办host\manage议会制辩论形式preliamentary debating style循环赛preliminary debate淘汰赛elimination debate八分之一决赛octofinals四分之一决赛quarterfinals半决赛semifinals决赛grand final正方pro side反方con side正方一辩the first debater of pro side反方一辩the second debater of con side计时员timekeeper评委打分score the competition定义要合理the definition should be reasonable素材要有说服力matter should be persuasive没有平局there is no draws in competitive commpetition 一辩： first debater二辩： second debater方友， my fellow debaters开始的，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....如果想要斥方的，行假：according to your logicYou are missing the point！（你没有重点！你没有中心！即，他在洞子，个候他很有可能会漏。
注意，要用are，不能成You're，因气，士气就没有了。
）You just don't understand what we talked about！（你根本就没有明白我了什么！即：解了，曲解了）You know what? You are straying from the main point！你知道？你已跑了！（也要注意，都用You are）自由的段，可以在他在的候，插去，“Wait！Wait！ You just said⋯⋯，did you？”（当然句要用在，你方的不正确 ~~）You are generalizing what I asked！(你在以偏盖全！即：我要你回答个，但方你去了！)Please ask my question！（不要回避我的！你回答！！）英语辩论赛常用语A征求他人点或意的用I would be glad to hear your opinion of⋯我很意听听你⋯⋯的意。
辩论赛英语作文Debate Competition。
Debate competition is a popular activity in many schools and universities. It is a formal discussion between two teams who present opposing arguments on a particular topic. The aim of the debate is to convince the audience that your team's argument is stronger than the other team's argument.Debate competition is a great way to develop critical thinking and public speaking skills. It also helps students to learn how to research, organize and present information effectively. In addition, it provides an opportunity for students to learn about different perspectives on a particular topic and to engage in respectful and constructive dialogue with others.One of the benefits of debate competition is that it encourages students to think critically about importantissues. By presenting arguments and counterarguments, students are forced to consider different viewpoints and to evaluate evidence and reasoning. This helps them to develop a deeper understanding of complex issues and to become more informed and engaged citizens.Another benefit of debate competition is that it helps students to develop their public speaking skills. By presenting their arguments in front of an audience, students learn how to communicate effectively and confidently. They also learn how to structure their arguments and to use persuasive language to convince others of their point of view.Debate competition also provides an opportunity for students to learn about teamwork and collaboration. In order to be successful in a debate, team members need to work together to research, organize and present their arguments. This requires good communication skills, mutual respect and a willingness to listen to others.In conclusion, debate competition is a valuableactivity for students of all ages. It provides an opportunity for them to develop critical thinking, public speaking, teamwork and collaboration skills. It also helps them to become more informed and engaged citizens who are able to engage in respectful and constructive dialogue with others. Therefore, schools and universities should encourage their students to participate in debate competition as much as possible.。
Contention 1: Maturity with members of the opposite sexWe can logically conclude that members from a coeducational school are generally more understanding of their opposing sex than those who are in a single-sex school.Students from single-sex schools are generally more immature (males in particular) when they face people of the opposing sex. They feel awkward, say stupid things and can’t talk to them like a real person because they don’t feel comfortable. With this point, how can they have a proper relat ionship? (leaving aside gay and lesbian relationships) Who wants to have a relationship with someone immature, let alone, live (if it comes to marriage) with them?Contention 2: More Diverse Friendship typesMore diverse friendship types would supposedly lead to bigger and better social life, which is important to have for school students as they progress in life. The logic behind this reasoning is that once you are in the working force, you must be able to deal with anyone that you work with, work for and assign work to. We do not live in a utopian environment where everyone single person lives up to your expectations. Going back to my point, the gender difference usually poses a particularly bias towards some personality types. For example, you will find more try-hard types of guys then girls and you will find more gossiping types of girls than guys.Contention 3: Co-ed school provide better educationIt has been proven that the education provided in Co-ed schools is actually better than those of single-sex schools. The following source [2] proves that being in a mixed classroom with both boys and girls in beneficial to the education of the students. Although the source's dominant idea is that “boys achieve higher grades with female peers”, we can still conclude that girls can achieve better marks with male peers. After all, the first paragraph of the given text tells us so.This chart shows the best scoring schools for the Higher School Certificate (an important test for high school students). The chart displays the best scoring schools within the state of New South Wales (Australia). The best scoring school for the HSC is James Ruse Agricultural School which happens to be co-educational. Perhaps we should also point out the massive difference percentage-wise between Rank #1 and Rank #2. James Ruse smashes North Sydney Girls High School (clearly a single-sex high school) by a clean 18.8%! How can you justify the superiority with the education of co-ed school to single-sex schools now?REBUTTALS“Students in Single-sex school success more than Co-ed Schools”My opponent’s first contention about students in single-sex schools having a higher success rate than Co-ed school is a direct contradiction of my 3rd contention in the previous round. My arguments and reasoning for third argument is so far conceded, but I will now respond to Pro’s argument. Pro has provided us his sources from the “FCAT”(an acronym of The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test). So far, I’d like to point out that although Pro has provided some stats that he most likely found, he has failed to provide any sources to prove of his claim. With this point put forth, we can accept this as a tentative truth until he proves he did not make up his sources.A second thing that I would like to point out is “Studies from the National Association for Single Sex Public Education.”I am astounded that Pro would have mentioned this. This clearly proves the huge bias of his source, whether they are true of or not is another matter. A study from the NationalAssociation for Single Sex Public Education is clearly going to try and support itself as much as possible. With this point, we have to seriously consider the reliability of Pro’s source.“Opposite Sex Studies at different rates”Well, considering that Pro has not provided any sources for his claim, we have to, for now, accept this merely as an opinion. And with this, as an opinion, it is very hard to justify exactly what he is talking about. Firstly, he claims that boys generally misbehave more during class. This is really hard to justify, as there are plenty of examples of boys who study diligently and are quite during class. He also claims that boys generally get more attention than girls do, because they tend to speak up more in class. In what context is Pro referring to? Is he referring to a all-boys school that are is known for a reputation for having rebellious boys and an all-girls school known to have the quietest classrooms that have ever existed?“Teacher that favour one sex over the other”Well a simple solution for this problem is that sexist teachers can just teach at a single-sex school. I am amazed that sexist teachers would teach at a co-education school. I wish Pro would actually provide his reference along with his citation point.For now, I have no more arguments to put forth. Most of my arguments have so far been conceded, so I will wait for Pro’s response in his following argument.Do you have any strong opinion on co-educational or single-sex schools?A supporter of co-educational schools would probably say that schools should be like the societies theybelong to. In Hong Kong, men and women mix socially on a day-to-day basis. In many fields men are evenlikely to have female bosses. It is, therefore, desirable that boys and girls grow up together,go to schooltogether, and prepare themselves for a society that does not value sexual separation.Some would go on to argue further that growing up with members of the opposite sex is important forpersonal development. Regular contact (接触) can remove the strange ideas about the opposite-sex and leadto more natural relationships. Single-sex conditions are seen as leading to more extreme opinions, and possiblyeven as encouraging homosexuality (同性恋), though there is no proof that this is the case.Those who are against coeducation often also fix their attention on the sexual side. Some parents fear thatclose contact with members of the opposite sex is dangerous for teenagers. They want their children to beattentive to their studies. Such parents feel uncomfortable with modern ways and the free mixing of the sexes.A stronger argument comes from research into school results. Girls grow up earlier than boys, tend to bemore orderly and are likely to be better at languages. In a mixed class,boys who might do well in a single-sexclass become discouraged and take on the rule of troublemaker. Certainly in the UK this situation has greatlyalarmed (惊动) the government for it to be encouraging co-educational schools to have some single-sexclasses.In the UK the best schools are all single-sex, strongly suggesting that co-education is not the bestanswer. This may, however, not be as simple as it looks.It may simply be that the famous old schools thatattract the best students happen to be single-sex,rather than that being single-sex makes them better schools.。
