城市规划专业毕业设计_外文翻译

  • 格式:doc
  • 大小:58.00 KB
  • 文档页数:11

下载文档原格式

  / 10
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Spatial Planning System of National Territory in Japan,China and Korea

日本、中国和韩国的国土空间规划体系

Kyungrock YE, Jun-hua ZHANG, Takeshi KINOSHITA, Xing-yan WANG Abstract: This study conducted the national territory planning system of Japan, China and Korea, on a premise to discuss possibility of integrated spatial planning of Eastern Asia. The purpose of this study is to arrange major spatial plans of three countries according to classification of urban and non-urban area, and to clarifying role of each spatial plan.。

文摘:本研究是在进行中国、日本、韩国的国土规划体系前提下,探讨整个亚洲东部的综合空间规划的可能性。本研究的目的是根据城市区域和非城市区域的分类,明确大空间计划下三个国家在规划中所扮演的角色。

As a result, Korea, the smallest country among three countries, has one system on land use, development and conservation, considering whole national territory to be one city planning area, and a role and relation of each spatial plan is comparatively clear. On the other hand, China, the largest country among three countries, although a role and relation of each spatial plan are clear in urban area, a general recognition for necessity of non-urban area planning is weak. In case of Japan, the characteristics that the spatial planning system is consisted on the division into urban area and non-urban area, is very similar to China, and there is hardly relation between these two kinds of spatial planning.

最终,作为最小国家的韩国,已拥有一个针对土地使用、发展与保护的体系,它把整个国家领土是一个城市规划区考虑,每个空间的规划的角色和关系较为清楚。另一方面,作为最大国家的中国,尽管市区的空间规划是很明确,但人们对非城市的空间规划重视程度都非常薄弱。在日本,空间规划系统对城市区域和非城市地区的划分原则跟中国是非常相似的,这两种类型的空间规划几乎没有必然的关系。

Key words: National territory plan; Japan; China; Korea; Spatial planning; Eastern Asia Community.

关键词:国土规划;日本、中国、韩国、空间规划、东亚共同体。

Recently it is frequently discussed on the Eastern Asia Community. This is still mainly focused on the economy, but in environmental aspect we also have some common serious problems ,e.g.sustainable development, bio-diversity, outstanding landscape/nature conservation, balanced development of town and country, cultural assets conservation/utilization and several environmental problems. In order to settle these subjects, it is important not only to challenge by each country but also to prepare a common framework for comprehensive spatial planning covering whole eastern Asia..

最近东亚共同体经常被讨论,主要关注仍然是经济问题,但在环保方面我们也有一些常见的严重问题需要解决,如可持续发展、生物多样性、优秀景观、自然保护、城乡协调发展、文化遗产保护、环境问题等。解决这些问题,重要的不仅是对每个国家的挑战,而是需要准备一个常见的全面覆盖整个亚洲的空间规划的框架。

This study was done to clarify the similarities and differences of national territory planning system of Japan, China and Korea as a first step to discuss on the subjects and possibilities of comprehensive Eastern Asian spatial planning. Until now the national territory planning system of Japan and Korea have already been studied , but the comparative study between three countries including China from the viewpoint of spatial planning has never seen before. We used mainly related literatures on planning system and government's official websites of each country to clarify the purposes of this study. And we classified each country's major spatial plans into four categories,national, regional, urban area and non- urban area, and discussed on the vertical and horizontal relation between them.

本研究之目的:第一步是明确日本、中国和韩国的国土规划体系的异同,讨论综合