隧道专业毕业设计外文翻译 精品
- 格式:doc
- 大小:89.01 KB
- 文档页数:12
毕业设计(论文)外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目:日本隧道维修文献、资料英文题目:文献、资料来源:文献、资料发表(出版)日期:院(部):专业:班级:姓名:学号:指导教师:翻译日期: 2017.02.14日本隧道维修Tunnel maintenance in Japan摘要本文论述了日本铁路隧道最近的维修技术和典型的变形情况。
检测隧道衬砌分为初级检查和辅助检查,在可行的检查中本文引进了无损检测的新技术。
修复和加强隧道变形的方法可分为:(一)土压力的对策(二)恶化衬里;(三)防渗漏水和冰霜伤害的应对措施;(4)防止剥落的应对措施。
此外,本文介绍了三个近期典型的日本铁路隧道变形案件;其中之一是Tukayama隧道对塑料的土压力,另一个是关于福冈隧道和Rebunhama隧道由于衬砌剥落造成的事故。
关键词:隧道维修,隧道检查;隧道修复,加固,无损检测1 引言隧道不同于地上建筑物,设计条件(地形,地质,地下水等)依变化情况而定。
因此,它是不容易在各种类型的地形中合理设计和建造,而且它在使用过程中会发生不确定的变形。
由于这些原因,隧道的养护和控制就显得很重要,为保持隧道的良好状态,可采用以下方法:如定期检查,隧道声音的正确判断,以及相应的应对措施。
变形的因素,可分为三组,即:(1)由于地质因素的土压力;(2)劣化的衬里材料;以及(3)漏水和霜冻损害(朝仓等人,1991年)。
1999年,在福冈北九州隧道沿山阳新干线(子弹头列车)和室兰线的Rebunhama隧道发生了混凝土衬砌剥落的的事件。
剥落,在各项建设工程中,已成为一个重要问题。
在本文,对隧道衬砌审查和变形的对策做了调查和评估技术,并介绍了一些典型的例子。
2 检查和诊断方法2.1 隧道的检查和诊断对隧道进行检查和诊断,能及时掌握变形是否影响结构的安全性和耐久性,然后采取适当的应对措施,以确保在评估结果的基础上保持隧道的良好状况。
因此,隧道的诊断和检查,是隧道维护管理最基础的部分。
毕业设计(论文)外文文献翻译院系:土木工程与建筑系年级专业:土木工程姓名:学号:附件:盾构SHIELDS指导老师评语:指导教师签名:年月日S HIEL D S【Abstr act】A tunnel shield is a structural system, used during the face excavation process. The paper mainly discusses the form and the structure of the shield. Propulsion for the shield is provided by a series of hydraulic jacks installed in the tail of the shield and the shield is widespread used in the underground environment where can not be in long time stable. The main enemy of the shield is ground pressure. Non-uniform ground pressure caused by the steering may act on the skin tends to force the shield off line and grade. And working decks inside the shield enable the miners to excavate the face, drill and load holes.【Keywor ds】shield hydraulic jacks ground pressure steering working decksA tunnel shield is a structural system, normally constructed of steel, used during the face excavation process. The shield has an outside configuration which matches the tunnel. The shield provides protection for the men and equipment and also furnished initial ground support until structural supports can be installed within the tail section of the shield. The shield also provides a reaction base for the breast-board system used to control face movement. The shield may have either an open or closed bottom. In a closed-bottom shield, the shield structure and skin provide 360-degree ground contact and the weight of the shield rests upon the invert section of the shield skin. The open shield has no bottom section and requires some additional provision is a pair of side drifts driven in advance of shield excavation. Rails or skid tracks are installed within these side drifts to provide bearing support for the shield.Shield length generally varies from1/2 to 3/4 of the tunnel diameter. The front of the shield is generally hooded to so that the top of the shield protrudes forward further than the invert portion which provides additional protection for the men working at the face and also ease pressure on the breast-boards. The steel skin of the shield may varyfrom 1.3 to 10 cm in thickness, depending on the expected ground pressures. The type of steel used in the shield is the subject of many arguments within the tunneling fraternity. Some prefer mild steel in the A36 category because of its ductility and case of welding in the underground environment where precision work is difficult. Others prefer a high-strength steel such as T-1 because of its higher strength/w eight ratio. Shield weight may range from 5 to 500 tons. Most of the heaviest shields are found in the former Sovier Union because of their preference for cast-iron in both structural and skin elements.Propulsion for the shield is provided by a series of hydraulic jacks installed in the tail of the shield that thrust against the last steel set that has been installed. The total required thrust will vary with skin area and ground pressure. Several shields have been constructed with total thrust capabilities in excess of 10000 tons. Hydraulic systems are usually self-contained, air-motor powered, and mounted on the shield. Working pressures in the hydraulic system may range from 20-70 Mpa. To resist the thrust of the shield jacks, a horizontal structure member (collar brace) must be installed opposite each jack location and between the flanges of the steel set. In addition, some structural provision must be made for transferring this thrust load into the tunnel walls. Without this provision the thrust will extend through the collar braces to the tunnel portal.An Englishman, Marc Brunel, is credited with inventing the shield. Brunel supposedly got his idea by studying the action of the Teredo navalis, a highly destructive woodworm, when he was working at the Chatham dock yard. In 1818 Brunel obtained an English patent for his rectangular shield which was subsequently uses to construct the first tunnel under the River Thames in London. In 1869 the first circular shield was devised by Barlow and Great Head in London and is referred to as the Great Head-type shield. Later that same year, Beach in New York City produced similar shield. The first use of the circular shield came during 1869 when Barlow and Great Head employed their device in the construction of the 2.1 in diameter Tower Subway under the River Thames. Despite the name of the tunnel, it was used only for pedestrian traffic. Beach also put his circular shield to work in 1869 to construct a demonstration project for a proposed NewYork City subway system. The project consisted of a 2.4 m diameter tunnel, 90 m long, used to experiment with a subway car propelled by air pressure.Here are some tunnels which were built by shield principle.Soft-ground tunneling Some tunnels are driven wholly or mostly through soft material. In very soft ground, little or no blasting is necessary because the material is easily excavated.At first, forepoling was the only method for building tunnels through very soft ground. Forepoles are heavy planks about 1.5 m long and sharpened to a point. They were inserted over the top horizontal bar of the bracing at the face of the tunnel. The forepoles were driven into the ground of the face with an outward inclination. After all the roof poles were driven for about half of their length, a timber was laid across their exposed ends to counter any strain on the outer ends. The forepoles thus provided an extension of the tunnel support, and the face was extended under them. When the ends of the forepoles were reached, new timbering support was added, and the forepoles were driven into the ground for the next advance of the tunneling.The use of compressed air simplified working in soft ground. An airlock was built, though which men and equipment passed, and sufficient air pressure was maintained at the tunnel face to hold the ground firm during excavation until timbering or other support was erected.Another development was the use of hydraulically powered shields behind which cast-iron or steel plates were placed on the circumference of the tunnels. These plates provided sufficient support for the tunnel while the work proceeded, as well as full working space for men in the tunnel.Under water tunneling The most difficult tunneling is that undertaken at considerable depths below a river or other body of water. In such cases, water seeps through porous material or crevices, subjecting the work in progress to the pressure of the water above the tunneling path. When the tunnel is driven through stiff clay, the flow of water may be small enough to be removed by pumping. In more porous ground,compressed air must be used to exclude water. The amount of air pressure that is needed increases as the depth of the tunnel increases below the surface.A circular shield has proved to be most efficient in resisting the pressure of soft ground, so most shield-driven tunnels are circular. The shield once consisted of steel plates and angle supports, with a heavily braced diaphragm across its face. The diaphragm had a number of openings with doors so that workers could excavate material in front of the shield. In a further development, the shield was shoved forward into the silty material of a riverbed, thereby squeezing displaced material through the doors and into the tunnel, from which the muck was removed. The cylindrical shell of the shield may extend several feet in front of the diaphragm to provide a cutting edge. A rear section, called the tail, extends for several feet behind the body of the shield to protect workers. In large shields, an erector arm is used in the rear side of the shield to place the metal support segments along the circumference of the tunnel.The pressure against the forward motion of a shield may exceed 48.8 Mpa. Hydraulic jacks are used to overcome this pressure and advance the shield, producing a pressure of about 245 Mpa on the outside surface of the shield.Shields can be steered by varying the thrust of the jacks from left side to right side or from top to bottom, thus varying the tunnel direction left or right or up or down. The jacks shove against the tunnel lining for each forward shove. The cycle of operation is forward shove, line, muck, and then another forward shove. The shield used about 1955 on the third tube of the Lincoln Tunnel in New York City was 5.5 m long and 9.6 m in diameter. It was moved about 81.2 cm per shove, permitting the fabrication of a 81.2 cm support ring behind it.Cast-iron segments commonly are used in working behind such a shield. They are erected and bolted together in a short time to provide strength and water tightness. In the third tube of the Lincoln Tunnel each segment is 2 m long, 81.2 cm wide, and 35.5 cm thick, and weighs about 1.5 tons. These sections form a ring of 14 segments that are linked together by bolts. The bolts were tightened by hand and then by machine.Immediately after they were in place, the sections were sealed at the joints to ensure permanent water tightness.Shields are most commonly used in ground condition where adequate stand-up time does not exist. The advantage of the shield in this type of ground, in addition to the protection afforded men and equipment , is the time available to install steel ribs, liner plates, or precast concrete segments under the tail segment of the shield before ground pressure and movement become adverse factors.One of the principle problems associated with shield use is steering. Non-uniform ground pressure acting on the skin tends to force the shield off line and grade. This problem is particularly acute with closed bottom shield that do not ride on rails or skid tracks. Steering is accomplished by varying the hydraulic pressure in individual thrust jacks. If the shied is trying to dive, additional pressure on the invert jacks will resist this tendency. It is not unusual to find shield wandering several feet from the required. Although lasers are frequently used to provide continuous line and grade data to operator, once the shield wanders off its course, its sheer bulk resists efforts to bring it back. Heterogeneous ground conditions, such as clay with random boulders, also presents steering problems.One theoretical disadvantage of the shield is the annular space left between the support system and the ground surface. When the support system is installed within the tail section of the shield, the individual support members are separated from the ground surface by the thickness of the tail skin. When steel ribs are used, the annular space is filled with timber blocking as the forward motion of the shield exposes the individual ribs.A continuous support system presents a different problem. In this case, a filler material, such as pea gravel or grout, is pumped behind the support system to fill the void between it and the ground surface.The main enemy of the shield is ground pressure. As ground pressure begins to build, two things happen, more thrust is required for shield propulsion and stress increases in the structural members of the shield. Shields are designed and function undera preselected ground pressure. Designers will select this pressure as a percentage of the maximum ground pressure contemplated by the permanent tunnel design. In some cases, unfortunately, the shield just gets built without specific consideration of the ground pressures it might encounter. When ground pressure exceeds the design limit, the shield gets “stuck”.The friction component of the ground pressure on the skin becomes greater than the thrust capability of the jacks. Several methods, including pumping bentonite slurry into the skin, ground interface, pushing heavy equipment, and bumping with dynamite, have been applied to stuck shields with occasional success.Because ground pressure tends to increase with time, the cardinal rule of operation is “keeping moving”.This accounts for the fracture activity when a shield has suffered a temporary mechanical failure. As ground pressure continues to build on the nonmoving shield , the load finally exceeds its structural limit and bucking begins. An example of shield destruction occurred in California in 1968 when two shields being used to drive the Carly V.Porter Tunnel were caught by excessive ground pressure and deformed beyond repair. One of the Porter Tunnel shields was brought to a halt in reasonably good ground by water bearing ground fault that required full breast-boards. While the contractor was trying to bring the face under control, skin pressure began to increase. While the face condition finally stabilized, the contractor prepared to resume operations and discovered the shield was stuck. No combination of methods was able to move it, and the increasing ground pressure destroyed the shield.To offset the ground pressure effect, a standard provision in design is a cutting edge radius several inches greater than the main body radius. This allows a certain degree o f ground movement before pressure can come to bear on the shield skin. Another approach, considered in theory but not yet put into practice, is the “w atermelon seed”design. The theory calls for a continuous taper in the shield configuration; maximum radius at the cutting edge and the minimum radius at the trailing edge of the tail. With this configuration, any amount of forward movement would create a drop in skin pressure.Working decks, spaced 2.4 to 3.0 m vertically, are provided inside the shield. These working decks enable the miners to excavate the face, drill and load holes, if necessary, and adjust the breast-board system. The hydraulic jacks for the breast-board are mounted on the underside of the work decks. Blast doors are sometimes installed as an integral part of the work decks if a substantial amount of blasting is expected.Some form of mechanical equipment is provided on the rear end of the working decks to assist the miners in handing and placing the element of the support system. In large tunnels, these individual support elements can weigh several tons and mechanical assistance becomes essential. Sufficient vertical clearance must be provided between the invert and the first working deck to permit access to the face by the loading equipment.盾构【摘要】隧道盾构是一结构系统,通常用于洞室开挖。
毕业设计(论文)外文翻译题目:Comparative Analysis of Excavation Schemes for a TunnelConstructed through Loose Deposits院(系)建筑工程学院专业土木工程班级130702姓名xxxxx学号xxxxx导师xxxxx2017x年5月1日通过松散堆积物构建了隧道开挖方案的对比分析摘要:由于周围岩石较弱,构造松散沉积物的隧道易于坍塌,二次内衬通常遭受过度变形。
因此,选择适当的挖掘方案是重要的,这将对隧道施工安全和随后的隧道运行产生影响。
本文采用亭子坝隧道,一条浅埋在浅沉积和冲积起源的高速公路隧道为例。
在施工期间,这条隧道经历了很多穹顶倒塌事件和先进的支援破坏。
对重组样品进行各向同性排水(CD)压缩试验,以获得松散沉积物的机械参数。
进行三维建模以模拟三种不同方案开挖后隧道中的应力和变形分布,即上下台阶隧道,三台隧道和单侧方向隧道掘进。
比较分析结果表明,单侧巷道隧道更适合该隧道,既可以减少拱顶沉降,又可以限制塑性区的开发。
对于类似地质环境中的隧道设计和施工,结果应该是重要的。
关键词:松散堆积物;力学参数; 隧道;开挖方案;比较分析。
说明随着中国交通基础设施快速发展,在过去的几十年里,许多新的隧道已经或正在通过具有挑战性的地质条件的地区建设等。
软岩在隧道建设中经常遇到。
软岩的力学特性导致快速变形和各种干扰(Sharifzadeh等人。
2013a;朱某等人。
2013)它能影响地下结构的稳定性。
为此,软岩石已受到很多关于交通隧道建设的关注。
例如,Jeng等人(2002)评价Mushan的变形砂岩和台湾北部对隧道变、形的影响。
Ozsan和Basarr(2003)计算出强风化凝灰岩Urus坝址引水隧洞的支持能力。
李和舒伯特(2008)研究了在软弱围岩中圆形隧道的长度。
Shahrour 等(2010)分析了用软土构建的隧道的地震响应。
Urban Underground Railroad arch tunnel Construction Technology Group Abstract Project in Guangzhou Metro Line, right-arch construction method of tunnels to explore. Subway Construction in Guangzhou for the first time put forward a double-arch tunnel to single-hole tunnel construction technology, and a single type of wall and split in the wall structure, comparison and selection of Technology solutions were obtained to meet the structural safety, construction safety and Economic benefits of better Technology solutions for the future design and construction of similar projects to provide reference and reference.Keywords: double-arch tunnel group; a single type of wall; construction Technology; split in the wall.As the circuit design requirements subway tunnel, the tunnel structure produces a variety of forms, ranging from cross-section from double-arch and the three-arch tunnel composed of double-arch tunnel section is commonly used in the connection lines and crossing lines. In this paper, engineering examples, according to tunnel in which geological conditions, duration requirements, raised through the comparison and selection can achieve rapid construction and the purpose of construction cost savings of the best construction programs.1 Project OverviewGuangzhou Metro Line Road station turn-back line of sports for sports Road station after the return line, structure complex, DK3 016.047 ~ 037.157 varying cross-section set the double-arch structure, three-arch structure of tunnels. Ranging from cross-arch tunnel excavation span 20.1m, excavation height of 10.076m, cross-vector ratio of 1:0.5, after lining a hole span 5.2m, large holes, after lining span 11.4m, the wall thickness of 1.6 m. Three double-arch tunnel excavation span 19.9m, excavation height of 7.885m, cross-vector ratio of 1:0.1. -Arch tunnel section of rock from top to bottom are: artificial fill soil, red - alluvial sand, alluvial - alluvial soil, river and lake facies soil, plastic-like residual soil, hard plastic - a hard-like residual soil, all weathered rock, strong weathering rock, the weathered layer and the breeze layer. Tunnel through the rock strata are more homogeneous, the intensity high, carrying ability, good stability. Thickness of the tunnel vault covering 15.5 ~ 18m, of which grade ⅣWai rock vault thickness 5.6 ~ 7.6m.Double-arch tunnel segment groundwater table is 2.28 ~ 4.1m, mainly Quaternary pore water and fissure water.Section 2 dual-arch construction scheme comparisonAs the double-arch tunnel segment structure more complex, the tunnel cross-section changes in large, complicated construction process, construction was very difficult, the construction cycle is long, so I chose a good quality and efficient completion of the construction program segment arch tunnel construction is particularly important. Selection of a construction program, the main consideration the following aspects: (1) construction safety and structural safety; (2) construction difficulties; (3) the construction cycle; (4) cost-effectiveness. Based on these four principles, through the construction of research and demonstration program to select the following two programs to compare the selection of the construction.2.1 a single type of wall construction planThe program's main construction steps and measures are as follows:(1) The right line of double-arch tunnel hole within the return line side of temporary construction access, dual-arch and the three-arch in the wall construction, is completed in a timely support for the wall, the construction to prevent bias.(2) construction of the wall lining is completed, according to "first small then big, closed into a ring" principle, the right line with the step method of construction, with CRD engineering method returned a four-lane span tunnel construction.(3) When the return line side of the construction to the three-arch tunnel in the wall, then in accordance with the right line of the wall construction method and the three-arch-arch in the wall construction, during which the right line to stop excavation until the completion of construction of the wall.(4) The return line side of the wall construction is completed, the right line to continue to move forward the construction.The construction method for the domestic double-arch tunnel of conventional construction method, Guangzhou Metro, Nanjing and Beijing Metro subway both applications, and can secure successful completion of the construction of tunnels. However,examples of past engineering and construction Technology research can be found, the program has weaknesses and shortcomings.(1) The program used in this project, in a short span of 21.11m of double-arch tunnel, the tunnel's opening between the supporting and secondary lining will be converted four times, the conversion too frequently.(2) wall and side holes covered by waterproof layer of tunnel lining construction, steel engineering, formwork, concrete pouring required multiple conversions, the construction period up to 2 months.(3) The lining is completed, the wall of anti-bias materials, equipment, support and input, resulting in higher construction costs, Economic efficiency will drop.2.2 The split in the wall construction planThe program's main construction steps and measures are as follows:(1) ranging from cross-double-arch tunnel into two single-hole, change the formula for the separation wall, the first line of one-way right-forward construction of the tunnel.(2) three arch tunnel in the wall to make the first non-Shi lining, according to single-line working condition through.(3) the right line of large-section double-arch tunnel wall construction method adopted in accordance with CRD.(4) The return line is in accordance with the right line of the opposite side of the construction sequence of construction.Adoption of this program is in fact a one-way in accordance with the construction of two methods, compared with the previous one, after the program has the following advantages:(1) reduction of the construction process to speed up the convergence process conversion.(2) reduce the construction difficulty, shortening the construction cycle.(3) reduce the construction costs and improve Economic efficiency.(4) change a single type of wall to separate the wall, completely solved the structure of double-arch tunnel waterproofing defects.(5) The three-arch tunnel in the latter pArt of the construction hole, equivalent to large-span rock tunnels reserved for the core is conducive to both sides of the double-arch tunnel construction safety (Table 1).Section 3 three-arch construction planRight-line direct access to three double-arch tunnel, the Support parameters to the original designs for grating erection of the whole ring, according to design the whole ring of shotcrete, and enhance the bolt at the wall vault settings (return right side Tong Line Construction method), wall construction in the tunnel when you need to get rid of Office, located at a vertical grill joints strengthened beam.Strict control of excavation footage of each cycle, grid spacing of 0.6m / Pin. Weak in the wall excavation using millisecond blasting program (conditional maximize the use of static blasting programs), minimize the wall rock and the lining of the tunnel has been disturbed, to ensure construction safety. The completion of excavation in the wall immediately after the secondary lining. After the completion of construction of the wall in wall voids of the backfilling, plus jack supports. The side of the construction is completed, carry out the other side of the wall construction. When both sides of the wall construction is complete, in a timely manner on both sides of a single-hole tunnel secondary lining, and then proceed to three-arch tunnel excavation and lining of the middle of rock. Construction, special attention should be three arch tunnel in the wall at the settlement and convergence deformation, such as the unusual phenomenon, an immediate reinforcement.4 construction of the force structure of Behavior AnalysisAcross the range of the double-arched wall canceled, changed to separate the wall, in the domestic urban underground railway engineering has not yet been a similar engineering design and construction experience, there is no such tunnel structure design, and therefore the structure is safe, as well as the course of construction conversion process of construction is safe, the program will be the focus of the study.Application of ANSYS finite element software for common procedures ranging from cross-arch tunnel numerical simulation, using stratigraphic - structural model of the structure of the tunnel by the force and deformation analysis (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3).The scope of the horizontal direction taken by force along the direction of the tunnel cross-section to cross-hole 3 times the limit, taking the top of the vertical direction to the surface, the bottom-hole span to 3 times the limit, unit model uses the DP formation of elastic-plastic material entity, the tunnel Lining with elastic beam element simulation, beam elements and solid elements used to connect coupling equation. Through the analysis of data in Table 2 we can see that during the construction of large tunnels in a greater impact on small tunnel, if a small section of the tunnel with the necessary strengthening of measures and control the removal of temporary support to the longitudinal spacing, the program is useful and feasible to The.5 Construction of key technologies and corresponding measuresArch tunnel construction segment is required on a strict construction organization and strong technical assurance measures carried out under the good job in organizing the construction of steps to prepare the construction of a variety of technical preventive measures are key to success.5.1 pairs of pull anchor and strengthen the boltAbolition of a single type of wall, the excavation is complete in the wall thickness of 0.8m, pull anchor and strengthen the right bolt set is very necessary. Φ22 steel bolt used on the pull bolt drug volume, pitch, 0.6m × 0.5m, the length of the wall thickness according to the 0.8 ~ 2.0m. Strengthen the bolt in the wall located at the invert and side walls at both sides, using 3.0m of Φ25 hollow grouting anchor, spacing 0.6m × 0.8m.5.2 in the body wall, grouting rock block foldersIn the wall of rock thinnest Department to 0.15m, after repeated blasting excavation process, the impact of the rock wall around the loose, their bearing capacity affected. Therefore, we must separate the wall in the vault, wall, invert Department for loose rock for grouting. Φ42 embedded steel, cement slurry to take - water glass pairs of liquid slurry, the parameter of 1:1 cement and 30 ~ 45Be sodium silicate solution, grouting pressure of 0.2 ~ 1.0MPa. In both excavation grouting in the wall were carried out, after the completion of the final excavation carried out in saturated sandwich wall grouting.5.3 millisecond blasting technology microseismsTunnel excavation construction method used in all drilling and blasting. Because the lot is located in downtown Guangzhou, the ground-intensive buildings, and the Tunnel "0" spacing excavation, blasting must be set aside in accordance with glossy layer of smooth microseismic millisecond blasting program construction blasting vibration control will be allowed within the . For the double-arch tunnel in which strata of Ⅲ, Ⅳgrade rock blasting to take measures as follows:(1) The blasting equipment, using low-speed emulsion explosive shock.(2) strict control of footage per cycle (0.6 ~ 0.8m), around the borehole spacing of 0.4m, reduce the loading dose to control the smooth blasting effect (Figure 4).(3) The use of multiple detonators per blast detonation, using non-electric millisecond detonator initiation network asymmetric micro-vibration technology.(4), excavation and construction of the wall at the second to take first reserve 1m smooth layer, Cutting away from the eyes arranged in the side of the wall on the second floor reserved for smooth blasting around the eyes more than surface layout of the empty eyes, a small charge. Put an end to ultra-digging, digging, when partially due to artificial air pick excavation.Through the above effective measures, in the wall during the construction of the second blast, right in the thick wall of 0.15m basic did not cause damage to the smooth passage of the double-arch tunnel "0" from the excavation.5.4 Auxiliary scissors to strengthen supportingBy ANSYS simulation analysis, in order to ensure that small section of tunnel construction safety, the need for auxiliary support of small section tunnel reinforcement to resist the impact of blasting and rock produced by the instantaneous release of excavation loads generated by bias.Supporting materials, using I20 steel, welded steel plate embedded in the grille on both ends, using high-strength bolt reinforcement. Support arrangement spacing of 0.6m, which are arranged on a grid for each Pin, arranged to extend the scope to a double-arch on each side of 1.2m, and the completion of the excavation before the big end. The height and angle of support arrangements to ensure the smooth passage of construction machinery andequipment. Through the construction of proof, supporting the setting is necessary and effective, small-section tunnels in additional support after the convergence of scissors just 5mm.5.5 Information ConstructionIn order to ensure structural safety and construction safety, in the tunnel construction process to carry out real-time monitoring measurements to study the supporting structure and the surrounding strata deformation characteristics to predict the corresponding supporting structure deformation and verify that the supporting structure is reasonable, for the information technology provide the basis for the construction. Construction Monitoring and Measurement shows a small section of the tunnel maximum settlement of 14.6mm, maximum settlement of large-section tunnel 17.2mm, structural convergence of a maximum of 7.6mm, maximum ground subsidence of 10mm, three-arched vault in the largest settlement of tunnel excavation 22.8mm.6 Construction SummaryThrough this project example, proved that the use of separate programs to ensure that the wall construction of tunnels section of arch construction safety and structural safety, duration of more than a single type of wall construction program faster 1.0 to 1.5 months. This project for similar future subway construction has achieved successful experiences and Application examples.By summarizing the analysis, the following conclusions:(1) In accordance with the actual geological conditions boldly changed a single type of double-arched wall to separate the construction of walls, similar to conventional ultra-small-distance tunnel construction, eliminating double-arch tunnel Construction of the wall must be of conventional construction method, the final lining of structural forces has little effect on the structure of water is more favorable, and shorten the construction duration. Through the construction of this project in two to realize ultra-small space tunnel "0" spacing Excavation of a major breakthrough in technology.(2) The construction of the key technology is to reduce the damage and disturbance of surrounding rock, as well as the protection of the tunnel structure has been forming.Therefore, in the double-arched wall at the weak control of a weak good millisecond blasting will be the focus of the success of the construction. Smooth layer of smooth blasting using reserved achieved the desired results. If the reserved right to take a static smooth layer of rock blasting will be even better.(3) to strengthen the weak in the wall is also supporting the construction of this important reasons for the success. From the mechanical analysis of view, invert the junction with the side walls are most affected, ensuring adequate capacity to withstand the initial load supporting; second is to strengthen the body in the clip rock column grouting reinforcement of its use of the pull bolt, strengthening bolt and grouting reinforcement, ensuring the stability of surrounding rock. Used in the construction of the pull-bolt if the full use of prestressed reinforcement, the effect may be better.(4) reasonably arrange construction sequence so that all processes in the conversion with minimal impact during the construction of each other.References[1] LIU Xiao-bing. Double-arch tunnel in the form of wall-structured study [J]. Construction Technology 2004-10, 15[2] Wang Junming. Weak rock sections double-arch tunnel Construction Technology [J]. Western Exploration Engineering, 2003-06[3] GB50299-1999 underground railway Engineering Construction and acceptance of norms [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 1999城市地下铁道连拱隧道群施工技术研究摘要:利用广州地铁工程实例,对连拱隧道群施工工法进行探讨。
Influence of underground water seepage flow on surrounding rockdeformation of multi-arch tunnelAbstract: Based on a typical multi-arch tunnel in a freeway, the fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in3 dimensions(FLAC ) was used to calculate the surrounding rock deformation of the tunnel under which the effect of underground water seepage flow was taken into account or not. The distribution of displacement field around the multi-arch tunnel, which is influenced by the seepage field, was gained. The result indicates that the settlement values of the vault derived from coupling analysis are bigger when considering the seepage flow effect than that not considering. Through the contrast of arch subsidence quantities calculated by two kinds of computation situations, and the comparison between the calculated and measured value of tunnel vault settlement, it is found that the calculated value(5.7−6.0 mm) derived from considering the seepage effect is more close to the measured value(5.8−6.8 mm). Therefore, it is quite necessary to consider the seepage flow effect of the underground water in aquiferous stratum for multi-arch tunnel design. key words: multi-arch tunnel; underground water seepage flow; coupling flow and stress; surrounding rock deformation; vault settlement1 IntroductionWith high speed development of our national economy, the highway is constructed on large-scale all around the country. Along the freeway from Changsha to Chongqing(one section of which is from Changde to Jishou), many tunnels have to be constructed. As these tunnels’s topography and geomorphic conditions are very complex and the rain is very rich, the invasion of underground water and surface water is a difficult problem in the tunnel construction and its future function. In the past railway and highway tunnel construction, some effective waterproof construction technologies were proposed . But the researches on the mechanism of coupling function of fluid and stress and its influence on tunnels are not enough. For example, LIU and CHENcalculated and analyzed the double-arch tunnel structure in water-eroded groove but did not consider the underground water seepage force. YANG et al studied the earthquake response of large span and double-arch shallow tunnel, combining with dynamic stress but without underground water seepage stress. In fact, tunnel excavation forms two secondary stresses fields that can change the distribution of initial rock stress field and theunderground water seepage field. And the seepage flow of underground water also has importantinfluence on the stability of tunnel.Generally speaking, when the surface water seeps in underground, it will constitute the initial seepage flow field together with the underground water. But after tunnel excavation the initial seepage flow field will be destructed. In order to achieve a newbalance, it can produce a new seepage flow field around the tunnel with the underground water flowing into the tunnel. The pore-water pressure can change the stress field of adjacent rock mass. This problem is the coupling flow and stress question on which some scholars study now . LI et al analyzed the subsea tunnel withcoupling process and LEE and NAM discussed the seepage flow force around the tunnel with coupling analysis. In order to know the effect of underground water seepage flow on the surrounding rock deformation of tunnel, a multi-arch tunnel(named Bi-Ma-Xi tunnel) engineering was analyzed with FLAC in this work.2 Engineering and geology conditions2.1 TopographyThe tunnel locates at a hill on long-term weathering and denudation action. In the tunnel area, there are some gullies that primarily s trike towards north and some strike from east to north. Tunnel axis direction and topographic contour line are intersected with orthogonal or a great angle at section K218+087−K218+380 and with a small angle or even parallel at section K218+380− K218+565. The topography is rather steep and forms a “V” type gully. The general hill strike is about 340˚, which is close from north to south. The topography slope is about 15˚−35˚. The green vegetation is mainly the small bamboo and herbaceous plants. The rock bed is visible in some places.2.2 Lithologyccording to engineering geology survey and drilling exposure data, the stratum of3D [1−3] 4][5]surveying area from young to old is as follows.The Quaternary Holocene(Qh): the soil-like loam layer, snuff color, plastic-stiffly,0−4.60 m thick. This layer is ignored in numerical model.The Upper Cretaceous (K2j): Sandstone layer, red brown or palm fibre or dust colour,fine-grained structure. The calcareous cemented rock layer is mixed with mud cemented rock layer and the former is the main part and it is thin and medium thickness structural layer. The horizontal bedding layer develops and the dip angle is small. According to weathered degree the stratum can be divided into three layers from the top down: intensely, weakly and tinily weathered layer. The sketch map of geology section is shown in Fig.1.Fig.1 Sketch of geological profile for tunnel2.3 Geology constitutionIn tunnel area there is no large fracture structure and nor any new tectogenesis. The geology constitution is a monoclinal structure. The rock dip direction of general occurrence is 95˚−115˚. The dip angle distribution ranges from 8˚ to15˚. Three sets of joint crack develop: 1) dip direction 148˚, dip angle 89˚;2) dip direction 350˚, dip angle 56˚; 3) dip direction 225˚, dip angle 77˚. The joint cracks mostly twist with pressure and crack faces are almost close. Minorities of the crack faces are patulous and the distance between two cracks often varies from 5 to 20 cm. The connectivity is fairly good.3 Construction of 3D numerical model3.1 model of numerical calculationThis tunnel is a freeway multi-arch tunnel, of which the left one and right one are general parallel. The two tunnels are about symmetrical by the middle arch wall. The average thickness of middle wall is 2.1 m. The key dimensions of tunnel section are shown in Fig.2.Fig.2 Sketch of multi-tunnel cross section (unit: cm)When modeling the tunnel, the direction along the tunnel is y-axis and in horizontal plane the perpendicularity of tunnel direction is x-axis and plumb upward is z-axis. The influence of tunnel excavation is considered. The radius of influence range is above 3 times of one tunnel span. So in width direction, 50 m extends respectively outside the left and right tunnel, plus the span itself, width direction calculation range is 125 m. Downwards from the original point is 3 times of the height of the tunnel, which equals 45 m and upward is till the earth’s surface (does not consider the clay layer, calculating depth range includes intensely, weakly, tinily weathered red sandstone from above to below respectively). The buried depth of the tunnel is about 25 m. Plus the 10 m of its height, in z-axis the depth is 80 m. Along the tunnel direction an unit length is considered because tunnel excavation can be considered asa plane-strain problem. The size of the 3D numerical model is 125 m×80 m×1 m. The 3D numerical model and its coordinate axis location are shown in Fig.3.Fig.3 3D numerical model of tunnel in FLACThe displacement boundary conditions are adopted in numerical model. Bottom border is constrained with vertical displacement and upper border is free border. Both left and right border are restrained with horizontal displacement. The same boundary conditions are applied in both the front and back borders in y-axis.3.2 Calculation parametersThe mechanics parameters in numerical analysis are provided by geotechnical engineering investigation data and combined with the national criterion need and parameters discount request in numerical simulation. The mechanics parameters of the surrounding rock and the C25 concrete middle arch wall are listed in Table 1. The surrounding rock and the concrete intensity criteria adopted is the elastic-plastic criterion of Mohr-Coulomb. Table 2 shows the surrounding rock relevant seepage flow parameters when coupling problem is considered in numerical simulation. Table 3 lists the parameters of shot concrete(primary lining) and anchor support structure of the multi-arch tunnel. In this calculation process, the parameters of Grade IV surrounding rock supporting system are adopted. And only the affection of the anchor and shotconcrete is considered. The effect of secondary lining is not considered in numerical simulation.4 Discussion on calculation results4.1 Surrounding rock deformation characteristics without underground water seepage flowBased on the established numerical model, the process in which the underground water seepage flow function was not considered was carried on by FLAC . Fig.4 shows the vertical displacement contour-line map in this instance after multi-arch tunnel excavation. From Fig.4 it can be obviously seen that nearby the tunnel excavation region the rock deformation is relatively serious. The vault rock displacement is negative, indicating that the displacement direction is vertical downwards and subsidence occurs. But around the tunnel bottom the surrounding rock displacement is positive, indicating that the direction is vertical upwards and bulging phenomenon occurs.In the process of numerical calculation, the left and right tunnels were simulated simultaneously, namely they were excavated in the identical section plane simultaneously, that is to say, the influence of the construction order is not considered. In the computation process ofFLAC , some interesting grid points were selected to monitor their vertical displacement. The monitored grid points’ number and corresponding coordinate position are listed in Table 4.Fig.5 shows the time process curves of z-displacement (absolute value) of the monitored grid points around left tunnel vault. From Fig.5 it can be seen that the vertical displacement value(or called settlement value) of tunnel vault surrounding rock has relationship with its own position. The clos er the grid point’s position away from the tunnel excavation region, the larger the settlement value. For example, on the middle upper grid point (41 ) of left tunnel, its final calculation settlement value is 3.7 mm, and another grid poi nts’ values are getting smaller with the distance becoming longer.Fig.5 Time process curves of z-displacement of monitored grid points around le ft tunnel vault4.2 Surrounding rock deformation characteristics with underground water seepage flowThe influencing factors of surrounding rock deformation after tunnel excavation in Refs.[10−13], mainly concentrating on the grade of surrounding rock, excavating and supporting method, the neighbor construction load and the construction working procedure. Generally it almost does not consider the influence of underground water seepage flow. But in fact, the underground water existence has important influence on the surrounding rock deformation. For instance, in the excavation and tunnel engineering, the underground water seepage flow can cause quite big displacement of the soil or rock mass and even threaten the safety of engineering . In this study, some quantitative researches on the influence of surrounding rock deformation were carried out by underground water seepage flow.The stratum is fully saturated with water before tunnel is excavated. The seepage flow boundary condition includes that thepore-water pressure of the top surface is limited to zero and the two sides as well as the base boundary are water-proof boundaries . Before tunnel excavation the pore pressure of the stratum is hydro-static pressure. After tunnel excavation, around the tunnel excavation boundary is simulated by a free water seepage flow boundary where the adjacent underground water infiltrates into the excavated area. And the seepage flow field of surrounding rock has been changed with the excavation being carried on. Then the coupling analysis was executed by FLAC .Fig.6 shows the vertical displacement contour-line map after multi-arch tunnel excavation when considering the underground water seepage flow function. Obviously it can be seen that in coupling analysis the arch subsidence quantity is larger than that of not considering seepage function andthe affected region is also wider than that of the former as shown in Fig.4.Fig.6 z-displacement contour-line map of surrounding rock when considering underground water seepage flow function (unit: mm)coupling analysis, as the change of pore pressure in surrounding rock, the effective stress will be changed and it will cause the rock porosity ratio to reduce, leading to a larger arch subsidence quantity compared with that of not considering the seepage flow effect. But the vertical displacements at the bottom of the tunnel are not changed a lot. Fig.7 shows the calculated vertical displacement value for both vault’s middle position (grid point 41 and gridpoint 52 ). It can be seen that the subsidence quantity gradually increases with computation development, after finally tends to its new balance, both vault’s vertical displacement quantities finally stabilize at about 5.7 mm and the two time process curves are basically consistent.Fig.7 Curves of both vault’s node displacement vs calculation stepsFig.8 shows the time process curves of z -displacement(absolute value) of the monitored grid points around the left tunnel vault when taking the underground water seepage flow intoconsideration. Contrasting with Fig.5 it is obviously seen that the settlement value of 41 grid point is increased and reaches 5.7 mm. And to the other monitored grid points, their subsidence quantities also basically tend to 5.0 mm. The calculation subsidence quantities do not change when their relative positions changes.Fig.8 Time process curves of vault settlement when taking underground water seepage f low into consideration4.3 Comparison of deformation measurement results of surrounding rock In the process of excavating, the Bi Ma-Xi tunnel, the inspecting and consulting company of the fourth investigation and design institute of Chinese Railways Ministry monitored the surrounding rock deformation. Fig.9 shows the monitored vault settlement curves at sections K218+280 and K218+310.#Fig.9 Curves of measured value of vault settlement in process of left tunnel excavationComparing Fig.9 with Fig.5 and Fig.8, the maximal vault settlement calculation value is 3.7 mm when without considering underground water seepage flow, and when taking it into consideration the maximal calculation value is equal to 5.7 mm. And the practical monitored results reach 6.5 mm and tend to be stable after 2 months when the tunnel is excavated. The case fits very well with the coupling analysis result. The vault settlement measurement values in this multi-arch tunnel are all basically leveled off between 5.8 mm and 6.8 mm.The calculation results of coupling fluid-mechanical analysis are slightly smaller than the measured results. The reason is that the numerical calculation is thought as converged when the maximal unbalanced force in surrounding rock tends to a less value after tunnel excavation. And it does not consider the effect of actual time. The parameters in calculating unavoidably exist difference with the parameter of rock mass in reality. These reasons lead to the difference between the coupling analysis and the engineering measurement. But the results obtained in section 4.1 are less than the measuring results considering it indicates that the numerical analysis without underground water seepage flow cannot meet the need of engineering.5 Conclusions1) When underground water seepage flow function is considered in coupling fluid-mechanical analysis, the calculation vault settlements have finally achieved5.7−6.0 mm with the interaction of undergroundwater seepage flow and stress release in surrounding rock around the tunnel. The coupling calculation results are very close to the vault measurement settlement. It indicates that constructing tunnels in aquiferous stratum the underground water seepage flow effect must be considered in the design phase.2) The settlement of the surrounding rock above the tunnel has close relationship with its own position. The region near the tunnel excavation zone has the biggest rock deformation, so it should promptly complete supporting measures. When not considering the seepage flow function, the farther the region, the smaller the rock deformation; but when considering the seepage flow function, the settlement of the surrounding rock is above the tunnel and then basically tends to stable in shallower tunnel and it has obviously influence on the ground surface subsidence.地下水渗流对双连拱隧道围岩变形的影响摘要:一般来说,对于高速公路双连拱隧道,用FLAC3D计算隧道围岩变形时是没有考虑到地下水渗流影响的。
外文文献原文及译文学生姓名:XXX学号:XXXXXXXXX班级: 隧道XX班专业:土木工程(隧道与地下工程方向)指导教师:XXX XXX2014 年3月隧道爆破施工引起的地面振动参数预测ALI KAHRIMAN伊斯坦布尔大学采矿工程系土耳其,伊斯坦布尔,阿牟西拉—34850尽管过去进行了许多研究来消除爆破引发的环境问题,遗憾的是由于问题的复杂性尚未建立一个通用的方法或公式。
震波和地面动力特性,爆破参数和场地因素的复杂性共同制约了这样一个通用标准的发展。
因此,仍然需要做实地研究来预测和控制爆破的影响。
该研究是在伊斯坦布尔地铁隧道中进行的,本文介绍了爆破引起的地面振动参数的测量结果。
在研究范围内,于隧道约300米的进程中使用4种不同类型的振动监测器对所有爆破进行地面振动分量测量,得到质点振动速度的估计峰值,并确定振动衰减曲线斜率与测试区的单段最大装药量。
在统计分析数据对后,得到质点振动速度和比例距离之间的关系。
1.介绍地面振动和空气冲击波等引起的环境问题是岩体爆破的产物,是不可避免的。
炸药周围的区域实际上是破碎且具有流动性的,爆破能通常会使一个相对较小的区域塑性变形和开裂;除此之外的剩余能量以弹性波的形式在地下传播。
如果炸药接近地表,也有可能通过空气传播。
在短距离内波成球状辐射且振幅与爆心距(爆源—测点)成反比。
在较长的范围内,其他两个因素会影响传播过程:(1)波形变化,分割成三种类型,以不同的速度传播;(2)传播介质的变化,如分层或开裂,可能会引起进一步的散射和扩散效应; 一个大断层可以很大程度上防止波在某一特定方向的传播。
若波传播所产生的水平动态应力超过建筑材料或岩石材料的强度,将损坏附近居民的建筑结构。
因此,地面振动和空气冲击波引起的环境问题已经在多种行业中面临并频频讨论,如采矿,建筑,采石等爆破作业不可避免的行业。
所以,爆破引发的地面振动需要被预测,监测和控制。
随着附近居民日益增加的对爆破引发的环境问题的不满,越来越需要设计更精确谨慎的爆破。
隧道设计准则Guidelines for the Design of TunnelsThis report is edited by Heinz Duddeck,Animateur o[the ITA Working Group on General Approaches in the Design of Tunnels.Present address:Pro[.Heinz Duddeck,Technical University of Braunschweig,Beethovenstrasse 51,3300Braunschweig,Federal Republic of Germany.翻译翻译日期:日期:2011–03–01隧道设计准则国际隧道协会一般设计方法工作组摘要:这份国际隧道协会工作组的第二份报告是关于隧道一般设计方法,其概括了国际上隧道设计一般程序。
绝大部分的隧道工程,土地都主动提供隧道开挖的稳定性。
因此,隧道设计一般方法包括了实地勘测、地面探查、原位监测以及应力和变形分析。
对于后者,本文介绍了目前应用的各种结构设计模型(包括观察法)。
同时给出了隧道衬砌的详细结构设计准则的和隧道设计的国家推荐准则。
本文基于广泛的隧道工程实践经验,希望能给世界各地的隧道设计者提供参考。
Guidelines for the Design of TunnelsITA Working Group on General Approaches to the Design of TunnelsAbstract :This second report by the ITA Working Group on General Approaches to the Design of Tunnels presents international design procedures for tunnels.In most tunnelling projects,the ground actively participates in providing stability to the opening.Therefore,the general approach to the design of tunnels includes site investigations,ground probings and in-situ monitoring,as well as the analysis of stresses and deformations.For the latter,the different structural design models applied at present--including the observational method--are presented.Guidelines for the structural detailing of the tunnel lining and national recommendations on tunnel design are also given.It is hoped that the information herein,based on experiences from a wide range of tunnelling projects,will be disseminated to tunnel designers throughout the world.1准则的范围国际隧道协会(ITA )隧道一般设计方法研究组成立于1978年。
隧道工程英语专业词汇隧道工程tunnel engineering隧道tunnel铁路隧道railway tunnel公路隧道highway tunnel地铁隧道subway tunnel;underground railway tunnel;metro tunnel 人行隧道pedestrian tunnel水工隧洞hydraulic tunnel输水隧道raulic tunnel山岭隧道mountain tunnel水下隧道subaqueous tunnel海底隧道水下隧道submarinetunnel;underwater tunnel 土质隧道earth tunnel岩石隧道rock tunnel浅埋隧道shallow tunnel;shallow-depthtunnel;s hallow burying tunnel深埋隧道deeptunnel;deep-depthtunnel;dee p burying tunnel偏压隧道unsymmetrical loading tunnel马蹄形隧道拱形隧道horse-shoe tunnel;arch tunnel圆形隧道circular tunnel矩形隧道rectangular section tunnel 大断面隧道largecross-section tunnel长隧道long tunnel双线隧道twin-track tunnel;double track tunnel曲线隧道curved tunnel明洞open tunnel;open cut tunnel;tunnel without cover;gallery隧道勘测tunnel survey超前探测drift boring工程地质勘测工程地质勘探engineering geological prospecting隧道测量tunnel survey施工测量construction survey断面测量section survey隧道设计tunnel design隧道断面tunnel section安全系数safety coefficient隧道力学tunnel mechanics隧道结构tunnel structure隧道洞口设施facilities of tunnel portal 边墙side wall拱顶arch crown拱圈tunnel arch 仰拱inverted arch底板base plate;floor隧道埋深depth of tunnel隧道群tunnel group隧道施工tunnel construction隧道开挖tunnel excavation分部开挖partial excavation大断面开挖large cross-section excavation全断面开挖full face tunnelling开挖面excavated surface隧道施工方法tunnel construction method 钻爆法drilling and blasting method 新奥法natm;newaustriantunnelling method盾构法shield driving method;shield method顶进法pipe jacking method;jack-in method浅埋暗挖法sallow buried-tunnelling method明挖法cut and cover tunneling;open cut method地下连续墙法underground diaphragm wall method;underground wall method冻结法freezing method沉埋法immersed tube method管棚法pipe-shed method综合机械化掘进comprehensive mechanized excavation辅助坑道auxiliary adit;service gallery 平行坑道parallel adit竖井shaft斜井sloping shaft;inclined shaft 导坑heading衬砌工艺lining process喷锚锚喷anchor bolt spray;anchor bolt-spray管段tube section接缝joint地层加固reinforcing of natural ground 弃碴ballast piling施工监控construction monitor control 超挖overbreak欠挖underbreak施工进度construction progress隧道贯通tunnel holing-through工期work period隧道施工机械tunnel construction machinery隧道掘进机tunnellingmachine;tunnelbor ing machine;tbm单臂掘进机single cantilever tunnelling machine全断面掘进机full face tunnel boring machine隧道钻眼爆破机械machine for tunnel drilling and blasting operation装碴运输机械loading-conveying ballast equipment衬砌机械lining mechanism钢模板steel form模板台车formworking jumbo混凝土喷射机砼喷射机concrete sprayer盾构shield泥水盾构slurry shield气压盾构air pressure shield挤压闭胸盾构shotcrete closed shield 土压平衡盾构soil pressure balancing shield 注浆机械grouting machine凿岩机rock drilling machine;air hammer drill凿岩台车drill jumbo;rock drilling jumbo围岩surrounding rock围岩分类surrounding rock classification围岩加固surrounding rock consolidation围岩稳定surrounding rock stability围岩应力surrounding rock stress围岩压力pressure of surrounding rock 山体压力围岩压力ground pressure;surrounding rock pressure围岩变形surrounding rock deformation围岩破坏surrounding rock failure软弱围岩weak surrounding rock支护support锚喷支护anchor bolt-spray support 锚杆支护anchor bolt-support;anchor bolt support喷射混凝土支护喷射砼支护shotcrete support;sprayed concrete support配筋喷射混凝土支护配筋喷射砼支护reinforced sprayed concrete support钢架喷射混凝土支护钢架喷射砼支护rigid-frame shotcrete support掘进工作面支护excavation face support超前支护advance support管棚支护pipe-shed support;pipe roofing support胶结型锚杆adhesive anchor bolt砂浆锚杆mortar bolt树脂锚杆resin anchored bolt摩擦型锚杆friction anchor bolt楔缝式锚杆slit wedge type rock bolt涨壳式锚杆expansion type anchor bolt 机械型锚杆mechanical anchor bolt预应力锚杆prestressed anchor bolt土层锚杆soil bolt岩石锚杆rock bolt衬砌lining整体式衬砌integral tunnel lining;integral lining拼装式衬砌precast lining组合衬砌composite lining挤压混凝土衬砌挤压砼衬砌shotcrete tunnellining;extruding concrete tunnel lining混凝土衬砌砼衬砌concrete lining喷锚衬砌shotcrete and boltlining;shotcrete bolt lining 隧道通风tunnel ventilation施工通风construction ventilation运营通风operation ventilation机械通风mechanical ventilation自然通风natural ventilation隧道射流式通风隧道射流通风efflux ventilation for tunnel;tunnel efflux ventilation;tunnel injector type ventilation隧道通风帘幕curtain for tunnel ventilation;ventilation curtain 通风设备ventilation equipment隧道照明tunnel illumination;tunnel lighting照明设备lighting equipment隧道防水Tunnelwaterproofing;waterpr oofing of tunnel防水板waterproofingboard;waterproofboard;water proof sheet防水材料waterproof material隧道排水tunnel drainage排水设备drainage facilites隧道病害tunnel defect衬砌裂损lining split;lining **ing隧道漏水water leakage of tunnel;tunnel leak坍方landslide;slip地面塌陷land yielding涌水gushing water隧道养护tunnel maintenance堵漏leaking stoppage注浆grouting化学注浆chemical grouting防寒cold-proof整治regulation限界检查clearance examination;checking of clearance;clearance check measurement隧道管理系统tunnelling management system隧道环境tunnel environment隧道试验隧道实验tunnel test试验段实验段test section隧道监控量测隧道监控测量tunnel monitoring measurement收敛convergence隧道安全tunnel safety隧道防火tunnel fire proofing火灾fire hazard消防fire fighting隧道防灾设施tunnel disaster prevention equipment;tunnelanti-disaster equipment 报警装置报警器alarming device;warning device通过隧道passing tunnel避车洞refuge hole避难洞避车洞refuge recess;refuge hole 电气化铁道工程电气化铁路工程electrified railway construction电气化铁道电气化铁路electrified railway直流电气化铁道dc electrified railway交流电气化铁道交流电气化铁路a.c.electrification railway低频电气化铁道low frequency electrified railway工频电气化铁道工频电气化铁路industry frequency electrified railway电压制voltage system电流制current system。
毕业设计外文资料翻译题目柔弱岩石上短距离隧道的动态施工力学的研究学院土木建筑学院专业土木工程班级土木学生二〇一一年三月四日Modern Applied Science V ol. 4, No. 6; June 2010 柔弱岩石上短距离隧道的动态施工力学的研究吴恒斌(通讯作者)重庆长江三峡大学土木工程系中国重庆万州市二段沙龙路780号电子邮件:hbw8456@贺云翔重庆长江三峡大学土木工程系中国重庆万州市二段沙龙路780号郭良松聊城建宇工程有限公司中国聊城252000摘要基于建设理论的新奥地利方法((NAM)),依赖在柔弱岩石的短距离隧道工程,通过构建数学模型并进行了三维弹塑性有限元法的建构过程中,双边墙的施工方法。
分析隧道周围一些测量点位移的变化和隧道开挖和洞室群围岩的稳定性,通过分析地表塌陷、承担的力量支护结构与塑性区。
结果表明,上述构造法是合理的在以后的隧道开挖,地表沉陷,隧道变形与早期隧道开挖的影响比较明显。
关键词:柔弱的岩石、小距离隧道、动态建筑机械、数值模拟1介绍过程的开挖与支护隧道是一项复杂的机械加工过程,施工过程之间的差别,开挖顺序,支持的时间大为影响工程结构系统(SHE et al., 2006).的力学效应由于周围岩石条件的复杂性普通的类似项目在柔弱岩石特别是小距离隧道工程的复杂连接中是不够的,因此,根据在施工过程中各负荷情况,在不同的围岩中有必要进行机械模拟和分析在柔弱岩石隧道衬砌方面的研究,SUN et al. (1994)考虑了时空效应隧道挖掘表面建立三维数模型。
CHENG et al. (1997) 分析了力学机制和FLAC隧道衬里复杂的承载能力,得到一些有用的结论。
JIN et al. (1996) 应用非线性粘弹性理论进行了三维有限元模拟圆隧道开挖过程。
Karakus(2007)阐述了由平面应变分析造成的三个尺寸挖掘影响。
因为时空效应还不能全部体现,许多研究人员进行了三维弹塑性有限元法和隧道开挖的弹塑性分析(AN, 1994, XIAO, 2000 & ZHU et al. 1996)。
我国隧道盾构掘进机技术的发展现状1. 我国盾构隧道掘进技术的发展历史盾构掘进机是一种隧道掘进的专用工程机械,现代盾构掘进机集机、电、液、传感、信息技术于一体,具有开挖切削土体、输送土碴、拼装隧道衬砌、测量导向纠偏等功能。
盾构掘进机已广泛用于地铁、铁路、公路、市政、水电隧道工程。
我国的盾构掘进机制造和应用始于1963年,上海隧道工程公司结合上海软土地层对盾构掘进机、预制钢混凝土衬砌、隧道掘进施工参数、隧道接缝防水进行了系统的试验研究。
研制了1台直径4.2m的手掘式盾构进行浅埋和深埋隧道掘进试验,隧道掘进长度68m。
1965年,由上海隧道工程设计院设计、江南造船厂制造的2台直径5.8m的网格挤压型盾构掘进机,掘进了2条地铁区间隧道,掘进总长度1200m。
1966年,上海打浦路越江公路隧道工程主隧道采用由上海隧道工程设计院设计、江南造船厂制造的我国第一台直径10.2m超大型网格挤压盾构掘进机施工,辅以气压稳定开挖面,在黄浦江底顺利掘进隧道,掘进总长度1322m。
70年代,采用1台直径3.6m和2台直径4.3m的网格挤压型盾构,在上海金山石化总厂建设1条污水排放隧道和2条引水隧道,掘进了3926m海底隧道,并首创了垂直顶升法建筑取排水口的新技术。
1980年,上海市进行了地铁1号线试验段施工,研制了一台直径6.41m的刀盘式盾构掘进机,后改为网格挤压型盾构掘进机,在淤泥质粘土地层中掘进隧道1230m。
1985年,上海延安东路越江隧道工程1476m圆形主隧道采用上海隧道股份设计、江南造船厂制造的直径11.3m网格型水力机械出土盾构掘进机。
1987年上海隧道股份研制成功了我国第一台φ4.35m加泥式土压平衡盾构掘进机,用于市南站过江电缆隧道工程,穿越黄浦江底粉砂层,掘进长度583m,技术成果达到80年代国际先进水平,并获得1990年国家科技进步一等奖。
1990年,上海地铁1号线工程全线开工,18km区间隧道采用7台由法国FCB 公司、上海隧道股份、上海隧道工程设计院、沪东造船厂联合制造的φ6.34m土压平衡盾构掘进机。
每台盾构月掘进200m以上,地表沉降控制达+1~-3cm。
1996年,上海地铁2号线再次使用原7台土压盾构,并又从法国FMT公司引进2台土压平衡盾构,掘进24km区间隧道。
上海地铁2号线的10号盾构为上海隧道公司自行设计制造。
90年代,上海隧道工程股份有限公司自行设计制造了6台φ3.8~6.34m土压平衡盾构,用于地铁隧道、取排水隧道、电缆隧道等,掘进总长度约10km。
在90年代中,直径1.5~3.0m的顶管工程也采用了小刀盘和大刀盘的土压平衡顶管机,在上海地区使用了10余台,掘进管道约20km。
1998年,上海黄浦江观光隧道工程购买国外二手φ7.65m铰接式土压平衡盾构,经修复后掘进机性能良好,顺利掘进隧道644m。
1996年,上海延安东路隧道南线工程1300m圆形主隧道采用从日本引进的φ11.22m泥水加压平衡盾构掘进机施工。
1998年,上海隧道股份成功研制国内第1台φ2.2m泥水加压平衡顶管机,用于上海污水治理二期过江倒虹管工程,顶进1220m。
1999年5月,上海隧道股份研制成功国内第1台3.8m×3.8m矩形组合刀盘式土压平衡顶管机,在浦东陆家嘴地铁车站掘进120m,建成2条过街人行地道。
2000年2月,广州地铁2号线海珠广场至江南新村区间隧道采用上海隧道股份改制的2台φ6.14m复合型土压平衡盾构,在珠江底风化岩地层中掘进。
2.网格挤压式盾构掘进机的应用1965年6月,上海地铁60工程区间隧道采用由隧道工程设计院设计、江南造船厂制造的2台φ5.8m网格挤压型盾构施工,总推力为3.724×104kN。
隧道覆土约12m,掘进长度2×600m。
盾构推进穿越的建筑物和地下管线均未受影响。
1967年7月,地铁试验工程完成,这是我国首次采用盾构掘进机施工地铁隧道。
1967年3月,上海打浦路越江公路隧道采用φ10.2m网格挤压型盾构,掘进总长1324m。
盾构总推力达7.84×104kN。
盾构穿越地面以下深度为17~30m的淤泥质粘土层和粉砂层,在岸边段采用降水全出土、气压全出土和局部挤压方法施工,在江中段采用全气压局部挤压出土法施工。
1970年以来,上海又用网格挤压盾构在长江边和海边建成了6条φ3.6~4.3m 的排水及引水隧道。
北京、江苏、浙江、福建等省市也用盾构法建造了各种不同用途的小直径隧道。
1983年,上海建设第2条黄浦江越江公路隧道一延安东路隧道。
1476m圆形主隧道采用盾构掘进施工,其中500m穿越黄浦江底,500m穿越市中心区建筑密集群。
为提高掘进速度和确保隧道沿线的构筑物安全,上海隧道公司自行设计研制了φ11.3m网格型水力出土盾构,这是在网格挤压型盾构基础上发展起来的新颖掘进机。
网格上布有30扇可开启和关闭的液压闸门,具有调控开挖面进土部位、面积和进土量的作用,可辅助盾构纠偏和控制地面沉降。
网格上还布设了20只钢弦式土压计,可随时监测开挖面部位土压值的变化,首次在盾构掘进过程中实现信息化施工。
开挖面高压水冲切土体,并采用大型泥浆泵接力输送泥浆,自动计量装置控制出土量,实现掘进、出土运输自动化。
衬砌拼装机的回旋装置首次采用了带制动器的大扭矩液压马达,起重量达5t,运转平衡。
盾尾密封装置吸收国外新技术,采用三道钢丝刷,并注入自行研制的盾尾油脂,确保了盾尾密封。
盾构推力由尾部周围48只油压千斤顶提供1.08×105kN推力,采用φ11.3m 网格型水力出土盾构,顺利穿越江中段浅覆土层和浦西500m建筑密集区,保护了沿线的主要建筑物和地下管线。
该盾构技术成果被评为国家科技进步二等奖和上海市科技进步一等奖。
3.土压平衡盾构掘进机的开发和应用70年代以来,英国和日本分别开发了具有刀盘切削的密闭式的可平衡开挖面水土压力的两种新颖掘进机一泥水加压平衡盾构和土压平衡盾构,使盾构掘进技术发生了一次新的飞跃。
1975年,日本隧道业兴起了泥水加压盾构热,1978年起,土压盾构也得到广泛的应用。
1987年,上海隧道工程公司成立土压盾构攻关小组,在消化吸收国外土压平衡盾构机理和设计制造技术的基础上,研制了国内首台φ4.3m加泥式土压平衡盾构掘进机。
φ4.35m土压平衡盾构全部采用国产部件,由上海船厂制造,用于市南站过江电缆隧道。
隧道总长度534m,在黄浦江底掘进,隧道埋深21~30m,穿越土层主要为砂质粉土。
隧道掘进顺利解决了高水压情况下的密封和砂性土的加泥塑流技术难题,施工性能技术指标达到80年代国际先进水平,技术成果获90年国家科技进步一等奖。
在掌握了国际先进的土压盾构技术以后的10余年间,隧道公司又陆续设计制造了10余台φ3.8~6.34m土压平衡盾构,用于取排水隧道和地铁隧道。
1993年,制造了1台φ6.34m土压盾构,用于南京市夹江排水隧道工程,穿越粉砂地层,掘进长度1294m。
1990年,国务院批准上海地铁1号线开工建设,圆形隧道选用7台φ6.34m土压平衡盾构推进。
第1台φ6.34m土压盾构于1991年6月始发推进,7台盾构掘进总长度17.374km,1993年2月全线贯通,掘进施工期仅20个月,每台盾构的月掘进长度达200~250m。
掘进施工穿越市区建筑群、道路、地下管线等,地面沉降控制在+1cm~-3cm。
φ6.34m土压平衡盾构见图。
1995年上海地铁2号线24km区间隧道开始掘进施工,地铁1号线工程所用的7台φ6.34m土压盾构经维修以后,继续用于2号线区间隧道掘进,同时又从法国FMT公司和上海的联合体购置2台土压盾构,加上上海隧道股份制造的1台土压盾构,共计10台土压盾构用于隧道施工,并从日本三菱重工引进4台φ6.14m土压平衡盾构。
2000年开工兴建的地铁明珠线二期区间隧道仍使用这10台φ6.34m土压平衡盾构施工。
2000年,广州地铁2号线工程海珠广场至江南新村3423m区间隧道选用2台φ6.14m复合型土压盾构掘进施工。
地铁隧道要从珠江底穿越,埋深16~28m,掘进地层主要为全风化岩。
2000年,北京地铁5号线工程进行区间隧道盾构掘进试验工程,引进1台土压平衡盾构掘进机。
南京地铁1号线区间隧道也选用3台土压平衡盾构掘进机。
4.泥水加压平衡盾构的引进和开发应用泥水加压平衡盾构是70年代英国最早开发和应用的,1975年起在日本得到广泛的应用。
1994年,日本东京湾道路隧道工程采用了8台世界最大直径14.14m 泥水加压平衡盾构掘进18.8km海底隧道,这是世界最先进、自动化程度最高的盾构掘进机。
1994年,上海延安东路隧道南线1300m圆形主隧道施工引进日本三菱重工制造的φ11.22m泥水加压平衡盾构。
泥水盾构设有掘进管理、泥水输送、泥水分离和同步注浆系统。
掘进管理和姿态自动计测系统能及时反映盾构开挖面水压、送泥流量、排泥流量、送泥密度、排泥密度、千斤顶顶力和行程、刀盘扭矩、盾构姿态、注浆量和压力等参数,便于准确设定和调整各类参数。
泥水输送系统和泥水处理系统。
延安东路南线隧道工程施工的φ11.22m泥水加压盾构具有自动化程度高、盾构掘进对周围地层影响小的优点。
盾构穿越厂房、防汛墙、地下人行道、高层建筑十分安全,沉降量小于2cm。
掘进速度一般为6m/d,最高达12m/d。
广州地铁1号线工程于1996年引进2台φ6.14m泥水加压平衡盾构,掘进5852m。
掘进地层为粉细砂、中砂、粗砂、粉质粘土和风化岩。
上海隧道股份在消化吸收φ11.22m泥水平衡盾构基础上,基本掌握了泥水加压盾构的设计计算方法,并于1997年自行设计制造了1台φ2.2m泥水加压平衡顶管机,用于上海合流二期过江倒虹管隧道工程,在高水压的砂性地层中顺利掘进1220m,其技术成果达到国际先进,被评为1999年上海市科技进步二等奖。
5. 异形盾构掘进机的研究和应用常用的盾构隧道掘进机为圆形,主要是圆形结构受力合理,圆形掘进机施工摩阻力小,即使机头旋转也影响小。
但是圆形隧道往往断面空间利用率低,尤其在人行地道和车行隧道工程中,矩形、椭圆形、马蹄形、双圆形和多圆形断面更为合理。
日本在80年代开发应用了矩形隧道,在90年代开发应用了任意截面盾构和多圆盾构,并完成了多条人行隧道、公路隧道、铁路隧道、地铁隧道、排水隧道、市政共同沟隧道等,使异形盾构技术日益成熟,异形断面隧道工程日益增多。
上海隧道股份于1995年开始研究矩形隧道技术,1996年研制1台2.5m×2.5m 可变网格矩形顶管掘进机,顶进矩形隧道60m,解决了推进轴线控制、纠偏技术、沉降控制、隧道结构等技术难题。
1999年5月,上海地铁2号线陆家嘴车站过街人行地道采用1台3.8m×3.8m组合刀盘矩形顶管掘进机施工,掘进距离124m。