意见书封面
- 格式:doc
- 大小:15.50 KB
- 文档页数:4
意见书封面意见书封面尊敬的XX单位领导:您好!我是贵单位的一名普通员工,对于贵单位的发展和工作环境一直非常关注。
长期以来,我积极参与工作,并以身作则,努力为贵单位的发展贡献力量。
今日,我怀着一颗忠诚和真诚的心,将我的宝贵心得和建议写下,呈递给贵单位的领导层。
作为一名员工,我对贵单位的发展有着深刻的理解和感悟。
首先,贵单位在X领域有着广阔的市场前景和发展机遇。
我认为,我们要紧跟时代的步伐,不断创新和改革,适应市场需求的变化。
只有通过创新,我们才能为贵单位带来新的发展机遇。
另外,贵单位在人才培养和管理方面也有一些需要改进的地方。
我建议,贵单位要加大对员工的培训投入,提供更多的学习机会和培训资源,提升员工的专业素质和技能水平。
同时,我们还应该加强对员工的激励机制,充分调动员工的积极性和创造力。
只有通过不断提高员工的素质和激励,我们才能更好地完成贵单位的发展任务。
此外,贵单位在企业文化和团队建设方面也有一些欠缺。
我认为,企业文化的建设是贵单位发展的核心和灵魂。
我们要弘扬正能量,营造良好的工作氛围,倡导团队合作和分享精神,激发员工的归属感和集体荣誉感。
只有打造出一个团结和谐的团队,我们才能共同实现贵单位的发展目标。
最后,我希望贵单位能够更加注重员工的利益和福利,关心员工的生活和工作环境。
我们应该提供良好的工作条件和职业发展机会,为员工创造更多的福利和待遇。
只有提高员工的获得感和幸福感,我们才能凝聚人心,打造一个稳定和谐的工作团队。
尊敬的领导,我对贵单位的发展充满信心。
我相信,只要贵单位能够正视问题,创新发展,加强管理,完善制度,提高员工的素质和福利待遇,就一定能够实现更好的发展和壮大。
最后,我衷心祝贵单位在未来的发展中取得更大的成绩,造福于员工和社会。
敬祝贵单位事业蒸蒸日上,蓬勃发展!此致,敬礼XX单位员工 XX日期。
意见书范文模板尊敬的XX领导:您好!我是公司的一名员工,我对公司的某些问题有一些意见和建议,希望能够得到您的关注和解决。
以下是我的意见和建议:一、公司内部沟通不畅目前,公司内部存在着沟通不畅的问题。
部门之间的信息交流不够及时,影响了工作的效率和协作的顺畅。
我建议公司建立一个统一的沟通平台,包括内部通讯工具和定期举行的部门间会议,以便及时沟通信息和解决问题。
二、缺乏培训机会和晋升途径我注意到公司缺乏针对员工的培训机会和晋升途径。
员工的岗位技能和职业发展受到了限制。
我建议公司设立培训计划,提供员工自我提升的机会,例如定期组织内部培训、鼓励员工外出参加行业相关的培训课程,以及制定合理的晋升制度,激励员工积极工作。
三、职工福利待遇有待改进公司的福利待遇相对较低,不能满足员工的基本需求。
我建议公司加强员工福利方面的投入,例如提高薪资水平、完善员工的社会保险和福利待遇。
这样不仅能够提高员工的工作积极性和归属感,也有助于留住优秀的人才。
四、工作环境和条件需要改善公司的工作环境相对较差,存在着噪音、灯光不足、空调不稳定等问题,这对员工的工作效率和工作质量造成了一定的影响。
我建议公司改善办公环境,如增加隔音设施、调节好灯光亮度、提供稳定的温度和湿度。
五、缺乏员工激励机制公司缺乏员工激励机制,没有明确的目标和奖励制度。
这会导致员工缺乏积极性和归属感。
我建议公司建立明确的目标和奖励机制,根据员工的工作业绩和贡献给予相应的奖励和晋升。
以上是我对公司存在问题的意见和建议,我希望领导能够高度重视并予以解决。
我深信在领导的关心和支持下,公司一定能够不断进步和发展,员工的工作积极性和企业的整体发展会有更好的提升。
祝公司蒸蒸日上,业务蓬勃发展!谨上敬礼XXX。
审查意见书封面[你的名字][你的职位][你所在的机构][机构地址][日期][审查意见书封面]尊敬的[收件人姓名],我谨代表[你的机构名称],荣幸地为您提供本次审查意见书。
我们对于您所提交的[项目名称]材料进行了仔细审查,并对该项目提出以下建议和意见,以便您能进一步改进和完善该项目。
封面上的审查意见书旨在为您提供一个总览和引导您了解审查员的主观观点和经验,以期您对于该项目的质量、合格性和可行性作出更加准确的评估。
下面是我对于您的项目的评价和建议的整体摘要。
首先,在审查过程中,我注意到您提供了详尽的项目信息,包括项目名称、目的、背景、方法和目标等内容。
这些信息清晰、准确地描述了您的项目,使读者能够快速理解您的意图和计划。
然而,我建议您进一步提供一些关于项目预算和时间表的细节,以便为读者提供更全面的了解和评估。
其次,您的项目目标和研究问题明确且具体,这对于项目的有效实施和评估至关重要。
您提出的研究问题是有挑战性的,并且能够为学术研究和实践提供有益的贡献。
然而,我建议您进一步展开对于研究目的和问题的论述,以便更好地解释其重要性和意义。
第三,您的研究方法和数据来源是合理和可行的。
您提供了一个详细的方法论框架,并解释了您将使用的数据类型和收集方法。
这对于项目的可信度和有效性至关重要。
然而,我建议您对于数据收集和分析的具体步骤进行更详细的描述,并考虑使用多种方法和途径来增强您的研究结果的可靠性。
此外,我注意到您已经提出了一个详细的项目风险和管理计划,这是一个很好的补充。
您对于可能出现的风险和问题进行了积极的预测和规划,展示了您对项目管理和风险控制的专业能力。
然而,我建议您进一步制定具体的措施和计划,以应对可能发生的风险,并确保项目的顺利进行。
最后,我认为您的项目对于实践和学术界都具有重要的意义,并对相关领域的发展和进步做出了有益的贡献。
我鼓励您继续努力,进一步推进该项目,并确保在项目实施和评估过程中进行必要的改进和调整。
附件:危险化学品生产企业现场安全检查意见书受检单位检查机关检查日期吉林省安全生产监督管理局制-------------各类专业好文档,值得你下载,教育,管理,论文,制度,方案手册,应有尽有--------------填写说明一、本检查意见书由直接监管该企业的安全监管机关填写。
二、本检查意见书用钢笔、签字笔填写,字迹要清晰、工整。
三、本检查意见书封面中的“受检单位”栏,填写提出安全生产许可证申请的单位全称;“检查机关”栏,填写实施检查的安全监管机关全称。
四、本检查意见书第3页至第6页表格的“检查内容”栏,填写检查人员的意见、理由或者依据;“检查人签字”栏,由检查该项内容的检查人员签字;“备注”栏,填写该项检查内容需要特殊说明的事项。
五、变更主要负责人、隶属关系或企业名称的,在填写本检查意见书第3页至第6页的32项检查内容之外,还要填写本检查意见书第6页“变更主要负责人、企业名称或者注册地址”栏相应变更事项的检查情况。
六、本检查意见书表格中“检查人员”栏,填写参与检查人员的简要情况。
七、本检查意见书表格中“检查实施机关意见”栏中,“检查人员检查意见”、“检查承办处室意见”、“检查实施机关意见”,可简要说明理由。
八、本检查意见书表格如果不能满足需要,可增设续表,格式和内容应与所续表格的要求相一致。
---------------------------------------------------------精品文档-------------各类专业好文档,值得你下载,教育,管理,论文,制度,方案手册,应有尽有-----------------------------------------------------------------------精品文档-------------各类专业好文档,值得你下载,教育,管理,论文,制度,方案手册,应有尽有-----------------------------------------------------------------------精品文档-------------各类专业好文档,值得你下载,教育,管理,论文,制度,方案手册,应有尽有-----------------------------------------------------------------------精品文档。
司法鉴定文书示范文本一××司法鉴定所司法鉴定意见书(××××公司司法鉴定意见书)(司法鉴定机构的名称+司法鉴定文书类别的标题:一般2号或者小1号宋体,加黑,居中排列)司法鉴定许可证号:000000000 (司法鉴定机构许可证号:3号仿宋体,居中排列)司法鉴专用章声明(2号宋体,加黑,居中排列)1.委托人应当向鉴定机构提供真实、完整、充分的鉴定材料,并对鉴定材料的真实性、合法性负责。
2.司法鉴定人按照法律、法规和规章规定的方式、方法和步骤,遵守和采用相关技术标准和技术规范进行鉴定。
3.司法鉴定实行鉴定人负责制度。
司法鉴定人依法独立、客观、公正地进行鉴定,不受任何个人和组织的非法干预。
4.使用本鉴定文书应当保持其完整性和严肃性。
(声明内容:3号仿宋体)地址:××市××路××号(邮政编码:000000)联系电话:000-00000000(司法鉴定机构的地址及联系电话:4号仿宋体)共页第页——————————————————————————————————————————————编号××司法鉴定中心用阿拉伯数字标识,年份应标全称,用方括号“[ ]列。
编号处加盖司法鉴定机构的司法鉴定专用章钢印)一、基本情况(3号黑体)委托人:××××(二级标题:4号黑体,段首空2字)(文内4号仿宋体,两端对齐,段首空2字,行间距一般为1.5倍。
日期、数字等均采用阿拉伯数字标识。
序号采用阿拉伯数字“1.”等顺序排列。
下同)委托鉴定事项:受理日期:鉴定材料:鉴定日期:鉴定地点:在场人员:被鉴定人:二、检案摘要三、检验过程四、分析说明共 页第 页——————————————————————————————————————————————五、鉴定意见六、落款司法鉴定人签名或者盖章 《司法鉴定人执业证》证号:司法鉴定人签名或者盖章 《司法鉴定人执业证》证号:(司法鉴定机构司法鉴定专用章)二○○×年×月×日(文书制作日期:用简体汉字将年、月、日标全,“零”写为“○”,居右排列。
天津文顾律师事务所关于【】公司【】股东大会的法律意见文意字第【】号致:【】公司天津文顾律师事务所受【】(以下简称“【】”或“公司”)委托,指派【】律师、【】律师(以下简称“本所律师”)出席【】股东大会(以下简称“本次股东大会”),并对本次股东大会的合法性进行见证并出具法律意见。
本法律意见书根据《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称“《公司法》”)、《中华人民共和国证券法》(以下简称“《证券法》”)、《上市公司股东大会规则》,以及《【】公司章程》(以下简称“《公司章程》”)等有关法律、法规和规范性文件而出具。
为出具本法律意见,本所律师审查了【】本次股东大会的有关文件和材料。
本所律师得到【】如下保证,即其已提供了本所律师认为作为出具本法律意见书所必需的材料,所提供的原始材料、副本、复印件等材料、口头证言均符合真实、准确、完整的要求,有关副本、复印件等材料与原始材料一致。
在本法律意见中,本所律师仅对本次股东大会的召集、召开程序、出席会议人员资格、召集人资格及会议表决程序、表决结果是否符合《公司法》、《股东大会规则》等法律、法规、规范性文件及《公司章程》、《股东大会议事规则》的规定发表意见,不对会议审议的议案内容以及这些议案所表述的事实或数据的真实性及准确性发表意见。
本法律意见书仅供【】本次股东大会相关事项的合法性之目的使用,不得用作任何其他目的。
本所律师根据法律的要求,按照律师行业公认的业务标准、道德规范和勤勉尽责的精神,对[]所提供的相关文件和有关事实进行了核查和验证,现出具法律意见如下:一、本次股东大会的召集程序二、本次股东大会的召开三、出席本次股东大会人员及会议召集人资格四、本次股东大会的表决程序和表决结果五、结论意见本法律意见书一式[]份,经本所盖章并由承办律师签字后生效。
(本页无正文,为《天津文顾律师事务所关于【】股东大会的法律意见》之签署页)天津文顾律师事务所负责人:鲁宏承办律师:×××承办律师:×××二○年月日。
企业视觉形象识别系统(VI)VI是视觉信息传递的各种形式的统一,是具体化、视觉化的传递形式,是CI中分列项目最多、层面最广、效果最直接的企业识别部分。
在象天洋这样的商场的整体CI战略中,VI是最能直接体现我们经营理念,也是我们面对消费者树立品牌形象最直接的手段。
在商场集团化发展的今天,需要建立一整套对外的视觉系统,同时也需要对这一整套系统进行有效的管理和应用,以期达到全面利用企业视觉资源的作用,所以提议商场建立整体VI视觉识别系统。
VI的概念VI是CIS(Corporate Identity System企业识别系统)的一个构成部分,VI是英语Visual Identity System (视觉识别系统)的简称。
VI是整套CIS中MI(Mind Identity System理念识别系统)、BI(Behavior Identity System 行为识别系统)在直观视觉上的体现,是企业品牌形象外化的重要组成部分,一套优秀的VI可以完美地诠释MI和BI,使企业品牌形象深入人心。
VI的作用当企业的经营过程中出现了下列情况时:1、企业标志不能代表企业真实面貌;2、与竞争者相比,自己的视觉形象处于不利地位;3、小到一张名片大到大型广告,各有五花八门的表现,却难以让人看出它们出自一家;4、对于下属企业和分支机构而言,从视觉表现上很难看出他们的归属。
5、还有的时候,你会面临升级、重组、上市等经营变化,在标志和视觉传达上均需要一种全新的设计。
这些问题,借助VI(Visual Identity)设计将获得解决。
所谓VI设计,是指将以标志为核心的所有视觉识别要素,运用统一的整体传达系统,传达给组织内部和外部人群,从而实现良性认同和沟通。
VI的作用,一方面使得旧形象获得更新或升级,使其更具美感和时代感,一方面统合所有视觉传达,使其更具一体感和持续感。
VI的基本要素包括标志、标准字、标准色、标准组合等基础设计项目,这些项目是企业形象的核心部分,只有严格执行设计标准,才可能在日后不断完善形象,实现传播的一致性。
MemorandumofLaw法律意见书Memorandum of Law 法律意见书According to the objects to whom the memo is issued, it is divided into two categories: “internal or office memorandum”(hereinafter referred to as “office memo”), and “external memo”第一节对内法律意见书Office MemoThe structure of an office memo1 Heading (抬头)2 Statement of Facts (事实陈述)3 Statement of Issues (案件焦点陈述)4 Short Answer (简要回答)5 Applicable Statutes or Cases (适用的法律)6 Discussion (案件分析讨论)7 Conclusion and Recommendation (结论和建议)1 HeadingOffice Memorandum of LawTo: Mao Hua, PartnerFrom: Gao Yueqiang, Junior Associate Assignment Date: June 1, 2003Submission Date: July 1, 2003Case: China Veture Tech, Inc. v. Banco Pupula,N.A.Docket Number: 03-C00178NYSOffice File Number: 03-L016GYRe: Whether substitute service is allowed underthe Civil Procedure Law of the People’sRepublic of China2 Statement of AssignmentStatement of AssignmentYou have asked me to prepare a memorandum of law limited to the question of whether our client,Mr. Defendant, has breached the contractbetween him and Ms. Plaintiff by directinghis sales agent to withhold payment untilSARA has been effectively controlled inChina. Specifically, you asked me todiscuss the applicability of the UnitedNations Convention on Contracts for theInternational Sale of Goods (简称CISG,联合国国际货物销售合同公约)3 Statement of Factsa.列举式Statement of FactsYear 2000On December 7: Tianjin Co. (hereafter: Claimant) emailed Shanghai Co. (hereafter: Respondent), confirming the agreement reached through tele-conference earlier in the morning. Claimant assured that Respondent would always receive the “best price”and identified this price as 8% lower than the ordinary price quoted to Claimant’s o ther clients.On December 15: Respondent faxed Claimant a purchase order, which was quickly acknowledged by Claimant. No shipping and payment procedures were specified.On December 27: Claimant express-mailed Respondent a standard contract in which an arbitration agreement designating a non-existing arbitration institution and a choice-of-law clause was incorporated. However, said contract did not contain the 8% discount as earlier agreed upon.b.陈述式Statement of FactsOn December 7, 2000, Tianjin Co., hereafter Claimant, reached an agreement with Shanghai Co., hereafter Respondent, through tele-conferencing. Claimant assured that Respondent would always receive the “best price”and identified this price as 8% lower than the ordinary price quoted to Claim ant’s other clients. Immediately thereafter, Respondent faxed Claimant a confirmation letter.Eight days later, Respondent faxed Claimant a bare purchase order containing no shipping or payment procedures, which order was quickly acknowledged by Claimant. Claimant, in addition, express-mailed Respondent a standard contract in which an arbitration agreement designating a non-existing arbitration institution and a choice-of-law clause was incorporated. However, said contract did not contain the 8% discount as earlier agreed upon.E.g.The Initial Agreement:On December 7, 2001, Tianjin Co., hereafter CLIMANT, reached an agreement with Shanghai Co., hereafter RESPONDENT, through tele-conferencing. CLIMANT assured that RESPODENT would always receive the “best price” and identified this price as 8% lower than the ordinary price quoted to CLIMANT’s other clients. Immediately thereafter, RESPONDENT faxed CLIMANT a confirmation letter.The Subsequent Order: Eight days later, RESPONDENT faxed CLIMANT a bare purchase order containing no shipping or payment procedures, which order was quickly acknowledged by CLIMANT. CLIMANT, in addition, express-mailed RESPODENT a standard contract in which an arbitration agreement designatinga non-existing arbitration institution and a choice-of-law clause was incorporated. However, said contract did not contain the 8% discount as earlier agreed upon.4 Statement of Issues5 Short Answer or Brief AnswerStatement of Issue: Under California law that may hold a bartender liable for negligently selling alcohol to a driver, is Ms. Bartender Zhang liable for injuries caused by her customer in an automobile accident after she served him two drinks even though he was visibly intoxicated already?Short Answer: Yes. Ms. Bartender Zhang is liable for the victim’s injuries because she negligently served two drinks to the driver customer who was already visibly intoxicated.6 Applicable Law许多律师事务所要求在office memo 中列明所适用的成文法规定所列法律条文应加双引号,并用单倍行距7 Discussion or AnalysisIRAC= Issue, Rules, Application, and ConclusionThe issue here is whether the bankruptcy code exempted from discharging( 不能通过破产免除……债务) a judgment obtained a doctor who had deliberately chosen a less effective course of treatment in order to save the client money [R] 11 U. S. C. §523 (a) (6) makes non-dischargeable (使不能免除……债务) any debt “ for willful or malicious injury by the debtor to another” [A] The plaintiff argued that the doctor’s willful decision to use a cheaper method of treating plaintiff’s injury qualified as deliberate under the statute. However, the court said that the section 523(a) (6) should be read as essentially identical to the category of intentional torts. In an intentional tort, the actor intends to cause the injury. Here, the doctor did an intentionalact which injured the plaintiff, but the doctor did not intend to injure her. [C] Thus, the plaitiff’s judgment against the doctor was dischargeable through bankruptcy proceeding分解方法The first issue to be discussed in this memo is the applicability of CISG Article 14 (1), which provides that “ [a] proposal for concluding a contract addressed to one or more specific persons constitutes an offer if it is sufficiently definite and indicates the intention of the offer to be bound in case of acceptance. A proposal is sufficiently definite if it indicates the goods and expressly or implicitly fixes or makes provisions for determining the quantity and the price.”Here, four requirements must be established before a proposal can constitute an offer:1.The proposal must be addressed to one or more specific persons;2.The proposal must indicate the intention of the offer to be bound in the case of acceptance;3.The proposal must indicate the goods;4.The proposal must expressly or implicitly fix or provide for determining the quantity and theprice.I will discuss each of these requirement separately. Regarding the first requirement……8 General Conclusion & RecommendationConclusionA motion to disqualify counsel under the advocate-witness rule(代理人和证人不得为同一人原则) is dependent on the facts, and thus Carter’s probable testimony must be flushed out(被排除). Based on current information, it is unlikely that the court would find that Carter ought to testify. Our ability to successfullymove to disqualify appears significantly greater under the prejudice test(证据偏见衡量标准). If Carter ought to testify on behalf of his clients or might testifyprejudicially to his clients ( 对其当事人不利的作证), it might still be possible to move to limit his participation to pro se representation (自我代理). Moreover, it is possible that even his pro se representation could be barred, if not totally, them at least from trial advocacy(庭内辩护).建议部分:Generally speaking, you are to give recommendations concerning the following aspects:1.What do you recommend as a result of the analysis and conclusion you have presented?2.What do you think are the next steps?3.Should a suit be filed?4.Should further investigation be undertaken?5.Should further research be taken?第二节对外法律意见书External MemoThe Format and Contents of External Memo:*Cover Page (Caption) (封面)*Table of Contents (目录)*Table of Authorities ( 引用表)*Statement of Jurisdiction ( 法院管辖依据)*Statement of Issue (s) (焦点陈述)*Statement of Facts (事实陈述)*Summary of Argument (Short Answer) ( 论点总结)*Introduction (引言)*Argument (分析)*Conclusion (结论)*Signature Section (签字)*Certificate of Service (证明书)*Addendum (附件)1 封面2 目录和引文表3 法院管辖权依据Statement of JurisdictionStatement of JurisdictionThe Court of Appeals for the State of Minnesota has jurisdiction to hear this appeal because an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is appealable as a matter of right (上诉法院必须接受的上诉,即法定上诉权) Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 518 N. W. 2d 58, 60 (Minn. App. 1994).4 焦点问题陈述Statement of Issue5 事实陈述Statement of Factse.g. (1) In order to attend a party that evening, Ms. Liu locked her two infants in her apartment. A fire broke out early in the morning and quickly engulfed the two helpless kids.(2) In the case at bar (在本案中), the defendant mother was preoccupied with her own plans to attend a party that evening. She left her two infants, aged five and three, alone in her apartment, locked in the bedroom, until morning. No one else was in the apartment when the fire broke out. None of the neighbors could reach the children because their mother had bolted the front door. The children could not get out of the bedroom because their mother had wedged a chair under the outside of the bedroom door to keep the children from leaving.(3)It is difficult to conceive a more graphic example of the term “abandon”than that which is presented here, where mere infants were rendered pitifully vulnerable to the dangers of the night as a result of the preoccupation of a mother with herpersonal pleasures.6 论点总结Summary of ArgumentSummary of ArgumentPlaintiff should be entitled to an equitable increase (合理增加) in its fixed fee based on the costs of the eight-month extension of management and support services that it provides as a result of the government’s change orders. In addition, the costs that Plaintiff incurred for 22 months of extended management and support services as a result of the government’s delay provide a basis for an increase in fee. T his increase is warranted because the contract establishes time of performance as a crucial element in defining the scope of work. In view of the above reason, Defendant’s motion to dismiss should be denied.7 分析和辩论ArgumentI.THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BECAUSE IT AW ARDEDCUSTODY TO AN ALCOHOLIC MOTHER……A.The Trial Court Did Not Consider the Best Interests of the Child Because It Ignored theFather’s Good Character and Financial Strength……(1)The child has manifested his willingness to live with his father.……@@@ IRAC rules may also be used in this part, or CRAC rules may be used according to the circumstances. 请对比下列和本章前节IRAC 例子在语言效果上的差别:CARC[C] The tort judgment against the debtor should be discharged. [R] Plaintiff argue that the debt is non-dischargeable under Section 523 (a) (6) of the bankruptcy, which exempts from discharge any debt” for willful or malicious injury by the debtor to another. “However, this case is controlled by Kawaauhau v. United States, 3001 U. S. 7418 (1998), in which the Supreme Court held that the exemption of Section 523(a) (6) limited to intentional torts. [A] In Kawaauhau, the debtor was a doctor who had knowingly prescribed a less effective course of treatment to the plaintiff in orderto save money. The plaintif fs argued that the doctor’s decision was “willful” for the purpose of Section 523(a) (6). However, the court said that the exemption was limited to intentional torts. Even though the doctor knowingly rendered less effective treatment, he did not intend to injure her. Thus, the tort judgment against him was held dischargeable. Similarly, in this case, the doctor was found to have knowingly driven with defective brakes, but the jury did not find that he intended to injure the plaintiff. His actions were negligent, perhaps even grossly negligent or reckless, but they do not constitute an intentional tort. [C] Thus, under Kawaauhau, this Court should discharge the tort judgment against the debtor.8 结论ConclusionConclusionFor the foregoing reasons, Counsel for Plaintiff prays that defendant’s motion to dismiss the case be denied.或者Request for ReliefIn the light of the submissions above, Counsel respectfully requests that this honorable court discharge the tort judgmentagainst the applicant.9 签字Signature结尾应当由律师或是代理人签字, 置于右下角,格式如下:Respectfully submitted this( date)-------------------------------------------(Your Name)Counsel for (Name of Client)Your Law FirmAddressPhone Number10 送达证明Certificate of ServiceCertificate of ServiceI hereby certify that on May 15, 2003, the foregoing Memorandum of Law, in support of Defendant’s Answer, was served by hand delivery, on Ms. Mao, the plaintiff, at her residency located at:71 Weijin Road, Tianjin. Suite 1000the People’s Republic of China. 300071。
意见书正文尊敬的负责人:我作为公司的一名员工,特此写一封意见书,将我对公司在某一方面的问题提出,并提供一些建议,希望能够对公司的发展和改进有所启示。
首先,我想谈谈公司的沟通方式和效率方面存在的问题。
在我参与的项目中,我经常感到团队之间的沟通不够顺畅并且效率不高。
很多时候,我们在讨论问题时缺乏明确的目标,并且缺乏一个明确的沟通渠道。
这导致了信息的传递不畅,很多时候我们都需要花费大量的时间去寻找相关的资料或者是等待他人的回应。
因此,我建议公司应该建立一个明确的沟通渠道,并对团队成员进行培训,提高沟通和协作的技巧。
此外,可以开展一些团队建设的活动,增进团队之间的合作,提高整体团队的效能。
其次,我觉得公司的培训机制还有待改进。
虽然公司已经提供了一些培训的机会,但是很多时候这些培训课程并没有很好地贴近员工的需要。
很多员工反映,在工作中遇到的问题和培训课程中所学到的知识没有很好地对应起来,导致培训效果不佳。
因此,我建议公司在进行培训课程的选择和安排时,应该更加注重员工的实际需要,并与员工进行充分沟通,了解他们的意愿和需求。
另外,公司可以提供更多的培训资源,比如在线学习平台或者是与其他公司进行合作,提供更多的培训机会给员工,帮助他们不断提升自己的技能和知识。
最后,我认为公司的员工关怀还有待加强。
在我在公司的工作期间,我感受到公司对员工的关怀还不够,很多时候我们只是在办公室里按部就班地工作,没有更多的交流和互动。
这种缺乏人文关怀的工作环境让我感到有些孤独和疏离。
因此,我建议公司应该建立一个员工关怀的体系,注重员工的工作和生活平衡,组织一些员工活动和福利制度,增进员工之间的联系和情感的交流。
此外,公司可以定期开展员工满意度调查,了解员工对公司的意见和建议,从而进一步改进员工关怀工作。
希望公司能够认真考虑我的意见,并在相应的方面进行改进。
只有不断优化公司的管理和服务,并照顾到员工的需求,才能够实现公司的长远发展和持续创新。
君山锚碇基础石方
爆破施工方案
安全评估意见书
设计单位:湖南恒安土石方爆破工程服务有限公司安全评估单位:福建省福宁爆破工程有限公司
2014年10月
君山锚碇基础石方爆破工程
施工方案安全评估意见书
1、设计单位
湖南恒安土石方爆破工程服务有限公司
爆破作业单位许可证等级:四级;编号:4300001300019
设计人:李斌证号:43JSZ0824; 批准人:周文权
2、施工单位
湖南恒安土石方爆破工程服务有限公司
爆破作业单位许可证等级:四级; 编号:4300001300019
项目负责人:周道
项目技术负责人:乔永平证号:52JSG0022
爆破员:彭真证号:4306020180143
安全员:周道证号:4306020280018
保管员:徐先兰证号:4306000300176
3、评估依据与参考资料
3.1《爆破安全规程》(GB6722-2003)
3.2湖南恒安土石方爆破工程服务有限公司爆破承担资格等级3.3《君山锚碇基础石方爆破开挖设计方案》
3.4现场勘察与环境调查
4、安评意见
4.1该工程位于岳阳市君山区洞庭二大桥A2标段范围内,为大
岳高速大桥段,锚碇基础直径分别为为64m和56m的园形,两个圆形基础相切,基础总深度大部分为34.5m,部分为40m,基础上部27m 深度可用机械开挖,剩下需要爆破的岩石深度最深的约12m,大部分在7.5m以下,总方量约为4万立方米。
4.2锚碇基础石方爆破区域四周300m范围内均无需保护的建(构)筑物,只有工程内部基坑四周己浇灌好的钢筋混凝土护壁,离爆破装药中心最近处仅4.5m,需要保护,岩石为板岩,岩石从风化—中风化、少部分为微风化。
大部分为普坚石,硬度系数f=6~12,可爆性一般,炸药用量约为13吨,雷管用量约为70000发。
该爆破工程可定为一般岩土爆破;
4.3施工单位资质、设计人员资格、施工人员符合规定;
4.4设计所依据资料较完整和可靠;
4.5《君山锚碇基础石方爆破开挖设计方案》总体可行;
4.6设计方法和设计参数合理;
4.7深孔与浅孔相结合的爆破方法可行;
4.8爆破地震波安全核算、飞石防护措施基本全面;
4.9工程环境安全措施落实可行。
评估单位:福建省福宁爆破工程有限公司
评估人:
时间:2014年10月28日。