英文辩论赛流程

英语辩论赛流程及规则English Answer:Debate Format and Rules.Pre-Debate Preparations:Topic selection: The topic for the debate is mutually agreed upon by the participating teams.Team composition: Each team consists of two or three speakers, one of whom serves as the captain.Research and preparation: Teams conduct thorough research and prepare arguments in support of their respective positions.Debate Structure:1. Opening Statements (4 minutes per team): Each teampresents an overview of their case, stating their main arguments and evidence.2. Cross-examination (4 minutes per team): Teams have the opportunity to question the opposing team's speakers.3. Rebuttal (3 minutes per team): Teams respond to the arguments and evidence presented by the opposing team.4. Closing Statements (3 minutes per team): Teams summarize their main points, reiterate their arguments, and conclude their case.Debate Rules:1. Time limits: Each team has a specified time limitfor each portion of the debate.2. Order of speakers: The order of speakers is determined by the debate format and team agreement.3. Respectful conduct: Speakers must treat each otherand the audience with respect, refraining from personal attacks or interruptions.4. Citing sources: Speakers must cite any sources used to support their arguments.5. No new evidence: Teams cannot introduce new evidence during cross-examination or rebuttal.Judging Criteria:Judges evaluate teams based on the following criteria:Content: The strength, clarity, and relevance of the arguments presented.Delivery: The effectiveness of the speaker's communication skills, including clarity of speech, organization, and engagement with the audience.Rebuttal: The ability to respond effectively to the opposing team's arguments.Overall impression: The team's overall impact on the audience and the judges.中文回答：辩论赛流程及规则。

英文辩论赛流程
英文辩论赛是一项高效的语言实践活动。

在比赛中，选手将有机会展示他们的口头表达能力和辩论技巧。

以下是英文辩论赛的基本流程。

1. 抽签决定辩题
在比赛开始前，主持人将宣布辩题。

然后，每个参赛队伍将抽签决定他们是正方还是反方。

2. 开场白
每个参赛队伍将有一至两分钟的时间做开场白。

其目的是让选手们介绍自己，并简要介绍他们的观点。

在此期间，选手们可以利用幽默手法来吸引听众。

3. 第一次辩论
正反方将轮流发表观点。

正方会先开始。

每个选手将有一定的时间来陈述他们的主张。

在此期间，对手方可以插入问题或提出反驳意见。

4. 交叉辩论
在第一次辩论结束后，正反方将有机会进行交叉辩论。

此时，选手们可以向对方提问并回答问题。

此环节旨在加深对方观点的理解，同时也鼓励选手们展示他们的逻辑分析能力。

5. 第二次辩论
在交叉辩论之后，正反方将继续发表他们的观点。

正方将有机会先开始。

在此环节结束时，选手们将进行最后的总结和结论陈述。

6. 结论
在比赛的最后，每个参赛队伍都将有机会发表结论陈述。

此时，选手们将总结他们的观点，并强调他们所持的意见的重要性。

7. 裁判评分
在比赛结束后，裁判将根据选手的表现评分并宣布胜利者。

以上就是英文辩论赛的基本流程。

如果你想提高你的口头表达能力和辩论技巧，这是一个非常好的机会。

练习使人进步，加油！。

辩论赛环节流程英语Debate Competition ProcessGood morning/afternoon everyone. Today we will be discussing the process of a debate competition.1. Opening Statements:The first step in a debate competition is the opening statements. Each team presents their position on the given topic and outlines their main arguments.开场陈述：辩论赛的第一步是开场陈述。

每个团队都会对所给话题提出自己的立场，并概述他们的主要论点。

2. Cross-Examination:After the opening statements, there is a cross-examination period where teams have the opportunity to question each other on their arguments and evidence.质询环节：在开场陈述之后，会有一个质询期，团队有机会就彼此的论点和证据进行质询。

3. Rebuttal:Following the cross-examination, each team presentstheir rebuttal where they counter the arguments made by the opposing team and strengthen their own position.反驳：在质询之后，每个团队都会进行反驳，他们会反驳对方团队提出的论点，并加强自己的立场。

4. Closing Statements:The debate competition concludes with closing statements where each team summarizes their main points and makes a final appeal to the judges.结束陈述：辩论赛以结束陈述结束，每个团队总结他们的主要论点，并向评委做最后的呼吁。

一、首先由正反双方一辩进行开篇立论，用时不超过三分半，有请正方一辩
感谢正方一辩的精彩立论，有请反方一辩进行先破后立，用时不超过三分半，有请感谢反方一辩的精彩立论，
二、下面进入质询环节
首先有请正方二辩向反方三辩提问，提问不超过三十秒，回答不超过一分半
由反方二辩向正方二辩提问
有请正方三辩向反方二辩提问
有请反方三辩向正方三辩提问
三、下面进行自由辩论环节，用时不超过五分钟
四、由反方四辩做总结，用时不超过4分钟
由正方四辩做总结。

英文辩论赛流程
英文辩论赛是一种鼓励学生思考和理性辩论的比赛形式。

它不仅可以让学生提高英语口语和表达能力，还可以锻炼他们的逻辑思维和团队协作能力。

本文将介绍英文辩论赛的流程。

1. 主题选择
在辩论赛开始前，需要确定要辩论的主题。

通常主题由主持人给出，辩手在比赛前准备自己的立场和观点。

主题可以是社会热点、政治议题或学校内部的校规等，一般情况下与学生的生活息息相关。

2. 报名参赛
辩手可以自己或与他人组队参加比赛。

在确定好参赛组合后，需要向主办方报名参赛。

参赛者提交个人信息和辩论的观点和计划。

3. 比赛规则
在比赛正式开始前，主持人介绍比赛规则和流程。

英文辩论赛通常分为正方和反方，每组由3名选手组成。

正方和反方各有一名代表提交开篇发言，接下来是辩手交替发言。

比赛时间一般由三部分组成：开场白、辩论和总结。

正方和反方各有开场白，用于介绍自己的观点和理由。

接下来是辩论阶段，每组辩手交替发言，表达自己的观点和反驳对方的观点。

最后是总结，每组代表总结自己的观点并对对方的观点进行总结和回应。

4. 评分标准
英文辩论赛最后由评委给出评分。

评分标准通常包括语言表达、辩论能力和团队协作能力等方面。

选手需要注意语音语调、语法和逻辑结构，尽可能让观众和评委听懂自己的观点。

5. 总结
英文辩论赛可以让学生锻炼自己的语言表达和辩论能力，提高团队协作和逻辑思维。

选择好的主题和认真准备可以让选手在比赛中得到更好的表现。

希望本文的介绍能够帮助大家更好地了解英文辩论赛的流程和规则。

英语辩论赛规则流程辩论赛是一种艺术性和思辨性强的比赛形式，通过辩论的方式进行观点的对决和辩证的思考。

辩论赛的规则和流程对于参赛选手的表达能力和逻辑思维能力有着很高的要求，下面是一般英语辩论赛的规则和流程的介绍。

一、辩论赛规则1.辩题：辩论赛的辩题是组织者提前确定的主题，参赛选手需要围绕该主题展开论述和辩论。

2.四个角色：辩论赛中一般有四个角色：正方一辩，正方二辩，反方一辩，反方二辩。

正方和反方分别代表着辩论的双方，一辩具有发言首位的优势，二辩具有辩论的总结和反驳的任务。

3.发言时间：每个角色在发言时需要遵守严格的时间限制。

正方一辩和反方一辩一般有3-5分钟的发言时间，正方二辩和反方二辩一般有4-6分钟的发言时间。

这样的时间限制既可以有效控制辩论的长度，也可以体现选手对辩论发言的概括能力。

4.争辩交锋：辩论赛中的争辩交锋是整个比赛的重点。

参赛选手在发言时需要充分展现自己的观点，同时也需要对对方的观点进行针对性的反驳和质疑，形成真正的思辨和辩证。

二、辩论赛流程1.抽签：比赛开始前，主持人或裁判负责抽签确定正反方的先后顺序。

2.申辩：比赛正式开始后，正反双方的一号选手发表申辩观点。

此时，一号选手需要准确快速地表达自己的观点，并阐述论证的理由和依据。

3.回应：对方的一号选手需要在听完申辩后进行回应，既可以批判对方的观点，也可以巧妙地应对对方的质疑和反驳。

4.辩论交锋：正方和反方的二号选手开始展开辩论交锋的环节。

二号选手需要总结之前的观点和论证，并针对对方的质疑和反驳进行全面的回应和辩驳。

5.再辩论交锋：交锋环节结束后，正反双方的一号选手再度发言，对之前的辩论进行再次总结和强调。

6.结论陈述：最后，正反双方的二号选手负责进行结论陈述。

在这个阶段，选手需要对辩论的主题进行归纳总结，并再次重申自己的观点和立场。

7.裁判评分：辩论赛结束后，裁判会根据选手的辩论表现和逻辑思维能力进行评分，选出最佳辩手和冠军。

以上就是一般英语辩论赛的规则和流程的介绍。

英语辩论赛流程以及评分标准一、英语辩论赛流程英语辩论赛采用国际议会制比赛形式，参照第十三届“外研社杯”全国英语辩论赛的要求，具体流程为：1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料;介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等;介绍评委及比赛规则。

2.、比赛阶段：比赛由正方和反方组成，双方各两名选手，选手可自行分工，一人担任一辩，一人担任二辩。

比赛前15分钟主席将辩题(motion)公布给两队，并由抓阄决定正反方，正方对辩题持肯定态度，反方对辩题持否定态度，双方在辩论开始前有15分钟准备时间，辩论具体进行过程如下：1)正方一辩发言(7分钟)第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示2)反方一辩发言(8分钟)第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示3)正方二辩发言(8分钟)第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示4)反方二辩发言(8分钟)第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示5)反方一辩总结(4分钟)第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第三分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时---举牌提示6)正方一辩总结(5分钟)第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时--举牌提示,第五分钟结束时---举牌提示比赛阶段注意事项:在提示牌提示结束后,有20秒宽限期,发言者必须在此期间内完成自己的发言,如果超过宽限期,则扣分.如果发言者发言时间远远少于规定时间,则评委会将此看作没有充分展开自己的观点而给发言者扣分.在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(point of information,简称为poi)比赛阶段提问者提出poi的注意事项:1)poi要简短，切题，机智。

严禁针对比赛规则和个人提出问题;2)提出poi时要从座位上起立，并举手示意.提问者可以用类似on that point,sir/madam的话引起发言者的注意;3)发言者可以采取以下方式回应对方提出的poi:语言拒绝(类似sorry)、接受提问(类似ok);4)如果提出poi的要求被发言者接受，那么poi的陈述要以澄清事实或提出评论为形式，用一两句话在15秒内表达出来;如果被发言者拒绝，那么提问者坐回原位，准备下一次提问;5)poi只能在前四个环节中提出，最后两个环节不能提出，前四个环节内第一分钟和最后一分钟内不可以提出poi;6)发言者如果接受poi，那么就应针对提问并围绕自己的发言回答问题;7)除非要提出poi，否则没有轮到发言的辩手不得在别人发言时起立。

英语辩论赛流程（三对三）第一篇：英语辩论赛流程(三对三)英语辩论赛流程一、英语辩论赛流程1、主持人致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；介绍选手及正反方所持观点等；介绍评委等。

2、比赛阶段：比赛由正方和反方组成，双方各3名选手，分别担任一辩、二辩、三辩。

辩论具体进行过程如下：（一）阐明立场阶段（2分钟）：由双方一辩进行观点说明。

也就是辩论双方针对辩论赛主题进行观点阐述。

1）正方一辩发言（1分钟）第1分钟结束时--举牌提示,最后15秒--举牌提示。

2）反方一辩发言（1分钟）第1分钟结束时--举牌提示,最后15秒--举牌提示。

（二）攻辩阶段（2分钟）：1）正方二辩选择反方二辩（1分钟）提问时间为10秒，回答时间为50秒。

2）反方二辩选择正方二辩（1分钟）同上3）正方三辩选择反方三辩（1分钟）同上4）反方三辩选择正方三辩（1分钟）同上（三）自由辩论阶段（2分钟）：时间是双方各2分钟。

由正反双方（六个辩手均可发言）自由轮流发言。

发言辩手落座为发言结束，同时另一方开始发言，另一辩手必须紧接着发言，若有间隙，累计时间照常进行。

同一方的发言次序不限。

如果一方用时已完，另一方可以继续发言，也可以向主持人提出不发言。

（四）结辩陈词阶段（2分钟）：由双方三辩进行结辩陈词。

也就是辩论双方针对辩论赛整体态势进行总结陈词。

1）反方三辩总结（1分钟）最后15秒--举牌提示。

2）正方三辩总结（1分钟）最后15秒--举牌提示。

3、主持人致辞：比赛结束。

二、比赛阶段注意事项:1、发言者必须在规定的时间内完成自己的发言；2、在辩论时不要随意打断别人的话；3、尊重主持人及评委的评判；4、在辩论中，辩手可以使用道具、图表和物品作为辅助手段以强化自己的陈辞，但尺寸不能过大，以免遮挡；5、时间提示：最后15秒时，举牌提示，时间结束时，铃声提示第二篇：三对三团体辩论赛三对三团体辩论赛一、赛制三对三团体辩论赛，比赛由队员陈词、盘问、自由辩论、总结陈词四部分组成。

英语辩论赛的步骤和程序 1、辩论赛开始2、宣布辩题3、介绍参赛代表队及所持立场4、介绍参赛队员5、介绍规则评委及点评嘉宾6、辩论比赛7、规则评委及点评嘉宾退席评议8、观众自由提问时间9、规则评委入席，点评嘉宾评析发言10、宣布比赛结果11、辩论赛结束自由辩论阶段，每方使用时间剩余30秒时，记时员以一次短促的___提醒;用时满时，以钟声终止发言。

攻辩小结阶段，每方使用时间剩余10秒时，记时员以一次短促的 ___提醒，用时满时，以钟声终止发言。

其它阶段，每方队员在用时尚剩30秒时，记时员以一次短促 ___提醒，用时满时，以钟声终止发言。

终止钟声响时，发言辩手必须停止发言，否则作违规处理。

提倡即兴陈词，引经据典恰当。

由于本次比赛辩题大都富于生活化色彩，所以开篇立论无须在理论的.层面上过多纠缠。

立论要求逻辑清晰，言简意赅。

(1) 攻辩由正方二辩开始，正反方交替进行。

(2)正反方二、三辩参加攻辩。

正反方一辩作攻辩小结。

正反方二、三辩各有且必须有一次作为攻方;辩方由攻方任意指定，不受次数限制。

攻辩双方必须单独完成本轮攻辩，不得中途更替。

(3)攻辩双方必须正面回答对方问题，提问和回答都要简洁明确。

重复提问和回避问题均要被扣分。

每一轮攻辩，攻辩角色不得互换，辩方不得反问，攻方也不得回答问题。

(4)正反方选手战立完成第一轮攻辩阶段，攻辩双方任意一方落座视为完成本方攻辩，对方选手在限时内任意发挥(陈词或继续发问)。

(5)每一轮攻辩阶段为1分30秒，攻方每次提问不得超过10秒，每轮必须提出三个以上的问题。

辩方每次回答不得超过20秒。

用时满时，以钟声终止发言，若攻辩双方尚未完成提问或回答，不作扣分处理。

(6)四轮攻辩阶段完毕，先由正方一辩再由反方一辩为本队作攻辩小结，限时1分30秒。

正反双方的攻辩小结要针对攻辩阶段的态势及涉及内容，严禁脱离比赛实际状况的背稿。

这一阶段，正反方辩手自动轮流发言。

发言辩手落座为发言结束即为另一方发言开始的记时标志，另一方辩手必须紧接着发言;若有间隙，累积时照常进行。

英语辩论赛的程序和步骤随着英语越来越广泛应用，用英语进行辩论的比赛也越来越普遍，今天店铺给大家分享一些英语辩论赛的程序和步骤，希望对大家有所帮助。

英语辩论赛的程序和步骤一、辩论赛程序(简要)1、辩论赛开始2、宣布辩题3、介绍参赛代表队及所持立场4、介绍参赛队员5、介绍规则评委及点评嘉宾6、辩论比赛7、规则评委及点评嘉宾退席评议8、观众自由提问时间9、规则评委入席，点评嘉宾评析发言10、宣布比赛结果11、辩论赛结束二、辩论赛细则1、时间提示自由辩论阶段，每方使用时间剩余30秒时，记时员以一次短促的铃声提醒;用时满时，以钟声终止发言。

攻辩小结阶段，每方使用时间剩余10秒时，记时员以一次短促的铃声提醒，用时满时，以钟声终止发言。

其它阶段，每方队员在用时尚剩30秒时，记时员以一次短促铃声提醒，用时满时，以钟声终止发言。

终止钟声响时，发言辩手必须停止发言，否则作违规处理。

2、陈词提倡即兴陈词，引经据典恰当。

3、开篇立论由于本次比赛辩题大都富于生活化色彩，所以开篇立论无须在理论的层面上过多纠缠。

立论要求逻辑清晰，言简意赅。

4、攻辩(1) 攻辩由正方二辩开始，正反方交替进行。

(2)正反方二、三辩参加攻辩。

正反方一辩作攻辩小结。

正反方二、三辩各有且必须有一次作为攻方;辩方由攻方任意指定，不受次数限制。

攻辩双方必须单独完成本轮攻辩，不得中途更替。

(3)攻辩双方必须正面回答对方问题，提问和回答都要简洁明确。

重复提问和回避问题均要被扣分。

每一轮攻辩，攻辩角色不得互换，辩方不得反问，攻方也不得回答问题。

(4)正反方选手战立完成第一轮攻辩阶段，攻辩双方任意一方落座视为完成本方攻辩，对方选手在限时内任意发挥(陈词或继续发问)。

(5)每一轮攻辩阶段为1分30秒，攻方每次提问不得超过10秒，每轮必须提出三个以上的问题。

辩方每次回答不得超过20秒。

用时满时，以钟声终止发言，若攻辩双方尚未完成提问或回答，不作扣分处理。

(6)四轮攻辩阶段完毕，先由正方一辩再由反方一辩为本队作攻辩小结，限时1分30秒。

英文辩论赛流程英语辩论赛采用国际议会制比赛形式，那么他的辩论赛流程跟中文的一样吗?今天店铺给大家分享一些英文辩论的流程，希望对大家有所帮助。

英文辩论赛流程English debating competition USES the international parliamentary form，with reference to the 13th "CNP cup" national English debating competition， concrete process is: 1， the chairman delivered a speech: announced motion and motion related background information; Introduce the players including college， professional， grade and sides of view， etc.; Introduce the judges and the rules of the game.2， competition phase:Game is composed of square and the opposition，two players， each player can division of labor， a person as a debate，one as a second argument. 15 minutes before the game the chairman will motion (motion) released to two teams，and determined by the lottery sides， for to be sure about motion，opposition holds negative attitude on motion， the two sides in the debate about 15 minutes before the time to prepare， debate specific process is as follows: 1) square a speech (7 minutes) - sign hint at the end of the first minute， -- a sign sign at the end of the 6 minutes， 7 minutes at the end of the tip - sign2) argue against a speech (8 minutes)-- a sign sign at the end of the first minute， -- a sign sign at the end of the 7 minutes， at the end of the 8 minutes - raising hints3) square 2 speak (8 minutes)-- a sign sign at the end of the first minute， -- a sign sign atthe end of the 7 minutes， at the end of the 8 minutes - raising hints4) argue against two speech (8 minutes)-- a sign sign at the end of the first minute， -- a sign sign at the end of the 7 minutes， at the end of the 8 minutes - raising hints5) argue against a summary (4 minutes)- sign hint at the end of the first minute， at the end of the third minute -- a sign up for， at the end of the fourth minute - raising hints6) square a summary (5 minutes)- sign hint at the end of the first minute， at the end of the fourth minute - sign hint， at the end of five minutes - raising hintsNote for the game stage:In touch after the prompt， have 20 seconds to grace period，the speaker must be within this period to finish their speech， if more than grace period，the penalty points. If the speaker speech time is far less than the prescribed time，the jury regarded without unfold own viewpoint fully to the speaker.In 1-4， before the other party may appeal according to the speaker is argument put forward his own point of view (point of information， referred to as POI)The race stage questioner POI considerations:1) the POI to short and to the point，tact. It is strictly prohibited according to the rules of the game and personal questions; 2) to stand up from his seat，POI and hands. The questioner can use similar on that point，Sir/Madam speaker attention;3) the speaker can take the following ways to respond to theother party put forward POI: language refused (similar to Shanghai)， accept questions (similar to "ok");4) if the POI's request to be accepted by the speaker， so POI statements have to clarify the facts or offer comments to form，the express in a sentence or two in 15 seconds; If you were rejected by the speaker so the questioner sat back and prepare the next question;5) POI can only be raised in the first four link， the last two links can't put forward，in the first four link within the first minute and can not be put forward in the last minutes POI;6) if the speakers accept POI， should according to questions and their speech to answer the question;POI，should put forward 7) unless otherwise not speak debater must not turn to stand up when others speak. If the opponent violation questions or disrupt the normal game rules，the player will be announced the foul;8) evaluate whether the POI put forward proper， should see its effect on both sides of the next debate9) the speaker in the speech must accept at least two POI，standing up questioners must be at least 4 times indicated the POI. Debater， if it does not have the opportunity to ask POI or in his speech did not accept the POI，the judges can discretionary points;3，audience member: the audience to sides each ask a question， select a player by both parties. The link at the end of the race， and increase the appreciation of the game， does not affect the result of the match.4， jury ruling: deliberations by a judge to review， submit to the chairman of the debate match results.。

辩论赛流程英文版（经典版）编制人：__________________审核人：__________________审批人：__________________编制单位：__________________编制时间：____年____月____日序言下载提示：该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的，希望大家下载后，能够帮助大家解决实际问题。

文档下载后可定制修改，请根据实际需要进行调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文，如总结计划、党团报告、合同协议、策划方案、演讲致辞、规章制度、条据文书、教学资料、作文大全、其他范文等等，想了解不同范文格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!Moreover, our store provides various types of classic sample essays, such as summary plans, party and youth league reports, contract agreements, planning plans, speeches, rules and regulations, doctrinal documents, teaching materials, complete essays, and other sample essays. If you would like to learn about different sample formats and writing methods, please stay tuned!辩论赛流程英文版a， shall be borne by the chairman of the debate1， the debate began2， announced the motion3， introduce the participating team and its position4， introduce team member5， introduce rules， judges and staff6， debate competition7， the judges review8， for audience questions， the judges score (simultaneous) 9， announced the result of the matchthe debate over 10second， the process of the debate1， the theoretical stage defense:(（1)positive and argue against a speech made by positive and negative sides zhubian stated his own first main point.must be completed within the specified time.(2）positive and opposite two apology speech square 2，against two contend with concise teXt focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view，(3）positive and opposite three speech by square three，against three respectively with concise teXt carries on the empirical analysis， provide arguments to support his own views.phase 2， free debate by tetragonal speak first， then the opposition spokesman，sides took turns to speak.(in a relatively concentrated period of time)3， summarize four contend for final statement by both parties，summarizes has side view，refute each other subjective point:(（1)argue against four summation(2）square four summation4.audience member: the audience to questions of both players，players must give the answer patiently.stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question.5， the judges scoring stage6， the judges review the process of both views and debate.7， the announcementthree， the rules of the debate1， each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time， over time， in accordance with abstained processing， and lose from team total score 5 points.2， free debate rules free debate speech must alternatesbetween the teams，the first to speak with a member of tetragonal， then one by opposition players， the two sides take turns， until you run out of time.(each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete， what time each other，each stick words between 60-800 words， can only ask a question at a time.)fourth， criteria(a)will be hired to review all the five judges of the game.(2）criteria1，point clear，argument is sufficient，citing appropriate， analyzed thoroughly.2， grabbed the other views and error， precedents and precise， and to the point.3， reflect agile， strong ability to deal with.4， articulate， level clear， tight logic.(3）the scoring method (group and individual scores respectively， out of 100)(（1)the topic: can the logic， theory， from the position held by the fact that such as multi-level and multi-angle，argument is sufficient， reasoning is clear， whether for his own difficulties with effective treatment methods.(2）the argument: if there is a convincing argument，argument is sufficient， whether logical reasoning process，the fact whether the reference is proper， true.(3）dispute: to ask whether to grab the key， the problem simple.no questions or questions within the time required，should be appropriate.the question of whether or not to answer each other， can you give a person the sense with justified.dont answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.（4): whether to have team spirit， mutual support， debate cohesion is closely.whether q&a form an organic whole， to a powerful blow to the other party.（5)argue the wind: the language and debate style eXquisite civility.personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.（4)points: every topic， argument， dispute， cooperate，argue the wind project， do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules，are appropriate.due to the fault causes of incidents affect the game， is decided by the jury， in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.（5)score project group and individual points per game comparison table is as follows:（6)score project group and individual points per game ofappraisal form(7)good debater respectively by the outcome of each race scores are the highest return.the game of "best debater" tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain，formula is: the total integral/attend the session.(8)the outcome of judgment1， the outcome of the game， on the basis of a few judges play group points，remove the a and a minimum points，calculating the remaining points scored an average of judgement.2， debater individual scoring points calculation method，calculation method with groups only as an individual award review basis， has nothing to do with judging each outcome.five， awards and incentives1， every game are selected each a good debater each team，will decide after the game one of the best debater.一、由辩论会主席承担1、辩论赛逐渐2、公布辩论3、详细介绍参加比赛参赛队及持有观点4、详细介绍参加比赛队友5、详细介绍标准、评审团及工作员6、辩论比赛7、评委点评8、观众们随意提出问题，评审团得分(同时进行)9、公布赛果10 辩论赛完毕二、争辩全过程1、辩方辩论结辩环节：(（1)正、反方一辩讲话先由正反面彼此主辩传出阐述己方主要观点贴。

英语辩论赛的详细流程English Answer:The detailed procedure of an English debating tournament typically involves several rounds and a specific format for each round. The structure and format of the tournament may vary depending on the specific rules of the competition and the number of participating teams. Here is a general overview of the common procedures involved in an English debating tournament:1. Registration and Team Formation: Teams typically consist of two or three speakers, and each team will be assigned a side to argue (affirmative or negative). Teams may be assigned a specific topic to debate or may be given a choice from a pool of topics.2. Opening Statements: The affirmative team presents their opening statement, outlining their main arguments and evidence in support of their position. The negative teamthen presents their opening statement, providing counterarguments and refuting the affirmative team's claims.3. Cross-Examination: After the opening statements, the teams engage in cross-examination, where they question each other's arguments and evidence. The cross-examination provides an opportunity to challenge the opposing team's claims and strengthen their own case.4. Rebuttal and Summary: Following the cross-examination, the affirmative team presents a rebuttal, responding to the negative team's arguments and reinforcing their own position. The negative team then presents their rebuttal, summarizing their main points and refuting the affirmative team's claims.5. Closing Statements: Each team delivers a closing statement, summarizing their key arguments and urging the judges to vote in their favor. The closing statements aimto leave a lasting impression on the judges and reinforcethe team's overall argument.6. Judging and Deliberation: A panel of judgesevaluates the performance of both teams based on criteria such as argumentation, evidence, delivery, and overall impact. The judges deliberate and determine which team has presented the stronger case and award the round accordingly.7. Subsequent Rounds: The tournament typically consists of multiple rounds, with the winning teams advancing to subsequent rounds. The format and procedures for each round may vary, but the general structure remains similar.中文回答：英语辩论赛的详细流程。

英文辩论赛流程范文辩论赛被广泛认为是一种激烈的、让参与者能够锻炼思维能力和交流能力的比赛。

在辩论赛中，选手必须围绕一个具体的议题，以一方支持、一方反对的方式展开争论，并通过有力的论据和逻辑性的论点来说服评委和观众。

以下是一个典型的英文辩论赛的流程：1.主持人介绍辩题和参赛人员：辩论赛开始时，主持人首先会介绍辩题和参赛的两组选手，同时让他们分别介绍自己的观点和立场。

2.第一组选手陈述观点：第一组选手（即正方）会在限定的时间内陈述他们的观点。

陈述过程中，他们需要明确表达他们的立场和主张，并用事实和论据来支持他们的观点。

3.第二组选手陈述观点：第二组选手（即反方）在第一组选手完成陈述后，也有相同的时间来陈述他们的观点。

他们需要明确反对方的立场，并提出他们自己的主张和支持论据。

4.第一组选手发表反驳：第一组选手会有一定的时间来回应第二组选手的观点，并试图驳斥他们的主张。

他们需要使用具有说服力的证据和逻辑来反驳对方的观点。

5.第二组选手发表反驳：第二组选手也会有一定的时间来回应第一组选手的观点，并试图驳斥他们的主张。

同样，他们需要使用具有说服力的证据和逻辑来反驳对方。

6.自由辩论：在这一环节中，两组选手将有机会自由辩论。

他们可以与对方的选手直接对话，提出问题，回答问题，并展示他们对辩题的深入理解和能力。

7.总结陈述：每组选手都有机会总结他们的观点，并概括辩论过程中的重点。

这是他们最后一次说服评委和观众的机会，因此他们需要简洁明了地表达他们的观点和论据，并重申他们的立场。

8.评委提问：辩论结束后，评委们会提出问题，让选手回答或对之前辩论中的观点进行深入解释。

这是评委综合考虑每组选手表现的一部分。

9.评委评分：评委们会根据选手在辩论中的表现给出评分。

评分可能基于选手的陈述逻辑性、论据的质量、表达能力以及对问题的回答等方面。

10.颁奖和总结：最后，主持人会宣布获胜组，并颁发奖品。

同时，主持人会对辩论过程及选手表现进行总结，并感谢所有参与者。

第1篇一、比赛开始1. 主持人致辞，宣布比赛规则、评委及工作人员。

2. 介绍参赛代表队及所持立场，正反方各两名选手。

二、辩论赛流程1. 阐明立场阶段（2分钟）：双方一辩进行观点阐述，正方一辩1分钟，反方一辩1分钟。

2. 攻辩阶段（2分钟）：正方二辩选择反方二辩进行提问，时间分别为10秒和50秒；反方二辩选择正方二辩进行提问，时间同上。

3. 自由辩论阶段（2分钟）：双方辩手自由轮流发言，时间各2分钟。

发言辩手落座为发言结束，另一方开始发言，若有间隙，累计时间照常进行。

4. 讨论时间（2分钟）：观众提问，双方选派选手回答。

三、时间提示1. 每个环节开始前，主持人会提前告知剩余时间。

2. 发言时间结束后，主持人举牌提示，最后15秒时再次提示。

四、评分标准1. 逻辑严密、论据充分、表达清晰。

2. 团队协作、反应敏捷、应变能力强。

3. 语言规范、发音准确、语言表达能力强。

五、比赛结束1. 评委点评，宣布比赛结果。

2. 颁发奖项，合影留念。

第2篇1. 主持人致辞：宣布辩题及背景资料，介绍选手及立场，评委及工作人员。

2. 比赛阶段：a. 阐明立场阶段：双方一辩分别进行1分钟观点阐述。

b. 攻辩阶段：双方二辩进行1分钟提问和回答。

c. 自由辩论阶段：双方各2分钟，辩手可自由轮流发言。

d. 讨论时间：观众提问，双方选派选手作答。

3. 规则：a. 发言时间：正方一辩1分钟，反方一辩1分钟，正方二辩1分钟，反方二辩1分钟，总结发言正方5分钟，反方4分钟。

b. 提问和回答时间：10秒提问，50秒回答。

c. 举牌提示：每分钟结束时举牌提示，最后15秒举牌提示。

d. 时间宽限期：20秒。

e. 超时扣分：超时或时间不足，评委会扣分。

4. 评分标准：a. 论点清晰、逻辑严密。

b. 语言表达流畅、准确。

c. 辩论技巧：提问、回答、反驳等。

d. 团队协作与配合。

5. 评委打分：评委根据以上标准进行打分，最终结果以平均分为准。

第3篇一、主持人致辞：1. 宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；2. 介绍选手及正反方所持观点；3. 介绍评委及工作人员。

英语辩论赛流程〔通用5篇〕英语辩论赛流程〔通用5篇〕英语辩论赛流程篇1一、英语辩论赛流程1、主持人致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；介绍选手及正反方所持观点等；介绍评委等。

2、比赛阶段：比赛由正方和反方组成，双方各2名选手，选手可自行分工，分别担任一辩、二辩。

辩论详细进展过程如下：〔一〕说明立场阶段〔2分钟〕：由双方一辩进展观点说明。

也就是辩论双方针对辩论赛主题进展观点阐述。

〔1〕正方一辩发言〔1分钟〕第1分钟完毕时——举牌提示，最后15秒——举牌提示。

〔2〕反方一辩发言〔1分钟〕第1分钟完毕时——举牌提示，最后15秒——举牌提示。

〔二〕攻辩阶段〔2分钟〕：(1〕正方二辩选择反方二辩〔1分钟〕提问时间为10秒，答复时间为50秒。

(2〕反方二辩选择正方二辩〔1分钟〕同上〔三〕自由辩论阶段〔2分钟〕：时间是双方各2分钟。

由正反双方〔四个辩手均可发言〕自由轮流发言。

发言辩手落座为发言完毕，同时另一方开场发言，另一辩手必须紧接着发言，假设有间隙，累计时间照常进展。

同一方的发言次序不限。

假如一方用时已完，另一方可以继续发言，也可以向主持人提出不发言。

〔四〕讨论时间〔2分钟〕：在讨论时间内，观众可向正反方各提一个问题，由双方选派一名选手作答。

该环节主要是增加比赛欣赏性，不影响比赛结果。

〔五〕结辩陈词阶段〔2分钟〕：由双方2辩进展结辩陈词。

也就是辩论双方针对辩论赛整体态势进展总结陈词。

(1〕反方2辩总结〔1分钟〕最后15秒——举牌提示。

(2〕正方2辩总结〔1分钟〕最后15秒——举牌提示。

3、主持人致辞：比赛完毕。

二、比赛阶段考前须知：1、发言者必须在规定的时间内完成自己的发言；2、在辩论时不要随意打断别人的话；3、尊重主持人及评委的评判；4、在辩论中，辩手可以使用道具、图表和物品作为辅助手段以强化自己的陈辞，但尺寸不能过大，以免遮挡；5、时间提示：最后15秒时，举牌提示，时间完毕时，铃声提示。

英语辩论赛流程篇2一、由辩论会____承当1、辩论赛开场2、宣布辩题3、介绍参赛代表队及所持立场4、介绍参赛队员5、介绍规那么、评委及工作人员6、辩论比赛7、评委点评8、观众自由提问，评委评分〔同时进展〕9、宣布比赛结果10辩论赛完毕二、辩论过程1、辩方陈词立论阶段：〔1〕正、反方一辩发言先由正反双方主辩发出陈述本方主要观点贴。

辩论赛流程英文版辩论赛流程英文版A, shall be borne by the chairman of the debate1, the debate began2, announced the motion3, introduce the participating team and its position4, introduce team member5, introduce rules, judges and staff6, debate competition7, the judges review8, for audience questions, the judges score (simultaneous) 9, announced the result of the matchThe debate over 10Second, the process of the debate1, the theoretical stage defense:(1) positive and argue against a speech made by positive and negative sides ZhuBian stated his own first main point. Must be completed within the specified time.(2) positive and opposite two apology speech square 2, against two contend with concise text focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view,(3) positive and opposite three speech by square three, against three respectively with concise text carries on the empirical analysis, provide arguments to support his own views.Phase 2, free debate by tetragonal speak first, then the opposition spokesman, sides took turns to speak. (in a relatively concentrated period of time)3, summarize four contend for final statement by both parties, summarizes has side view, refute each other subjectivepoint:(1) argue against four summation(2) square four summation4. Audience member: the audience to questions of both players, players must give the answer patiently. Stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question.5, the judges scoring stage6, the judges review the process of both views and debate.7, the announcementThree, the rules of the debate1, each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time, over time, in accordance with abstained processing, and lose from team total score 5 points.2, free debate rules free debate speech must alternates between the teams, the first to speak with a member of tetragonal, then one by opposition players, the two sides take turns, until you run out of time. (each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete, what time each other, each stick words between 60-800 words, can only ask a question at a time.)Fourth, criteria(a) will be hired to review all the five judges of the game.(2) criteria1, point clear, argument is sufficient, citing appropriate, analyzed thoroughly.2, grabbed the other views and error, precedents and precise, and to the point.3, reflect agile, strong ability to deal with.4, articulate, level clear, tight logic.(3) the scoring method (group and individual scores respectively, out of 100)(1) the topic: can the logic, theory, from the position held by the fact that such as multi-level and multi-angle, argument is sufficient, reasoning is clear, whether for his own difficulties with effective treatment methods.(2) the argument: if there is a convincing argument, argument is sufficient, whether logical reasoning process, the fact whether the reference is proper, true.(3) dispute: to ask whether to grab the key, the problem simple. No questions or questions within the time required, should be appropriate. The question of whether or not to answer each other, can you give a person the sense with justified. Don't answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.(4) : whether to have team spirit, mutual support, debate cohesion is closely. Whether q&a form an organic whole, to a powerful blow to the other party.(5) argue the wind: the language and debate style exquisite civility. Personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.(4) points: every topic, argument, dispute, cooperate, argue the wind project, do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules, are appropriate. Due to the fault causes of incidents affect the game, is decided by the jury, in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.(5) score project group and individual points per game comparison table is as follows:(6) score project group and individual points per game of appraisal form(7) good debater respectively by the outcome of each racescores are the highest return. The game of "best debater" tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain, formula is: the total integral/attend the session.(8) the outcome of judgment1, the outcome of the game, on the basis of a few judges play group points, remove the a and a minimum points, calculating the remaining points scored an average of judgement.2, debater individual scoring points calculation method, calculation method with groups only as an individual award review basis, has nothing to do with judging each outcome.Five, awards and incentives1, every game are selected each a good debater each team, will decide after the game one of the best debater.一、由辩论会主席承担。