Study of Nuclear Suppression at Large Forward Rapidities in d-Au Collisions at Relativistic
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:168.81 KB
- 文档页数:6
Nuclear energy is a topic that has been widely discussed and debated in recent years due to its potential benefits and risks.This essay will delve into the various aspects of nuclear power,including its advantages,disadvantages,and the role it plays in the global energy landscape.IntroductionNuclear energy,harnessed through nuclear fission,has been a significant source of electricity since the mid20th century.It is a lowcarbon energy source that can help meet the worlds growing energy demands while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.However, the use of nuclear power is not without its controversies,particularly concerning safety, waste disposal,and the potential for nuclear proliferation.Advantages of Nuclear Energy1.High Energy Density:Nuclear power has an extremely high energy density,meaning that a small amount of nuclear fuel can produce a large amount of electricity.This makes it an efficient energy source in terms of land use and fuel transportation.2.Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions:Unlike fossil fuels,nuclear power plants do not emit carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases during operation,making them a cleaner alternative for reducing the impact on climate change.3.Reliability:Nuclear plants can operate continuously,providing a stable baseload of electricity,which is crucial for maintaining a reliable power grid.4.Longterm Energy Supply:Uranium,the primary fuel for nuclear reactors,is abundant and can provide energy for many decades,offering a longterm solution to energy needs.Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy1.Safety Concerns:The most significant concern with nuclear power is the potential for catastrophic accidents,as seen in Chernobyl and Fukushima.These incidents have raised questions about the safety of nuclear technology and the adequacy of containment measures.2.Nuclear Waste:The disposal of radioactive waste is a major challenge.While the volume is relatively small compared to other energy sources,the long halflife of some radioactive isotopes means that waste must be safely stored for thousands of years.3.High Initial Costs:Building a nuclear power plant requires a substantial initial investment,which can be a barrier to entry for many countries,especially those with limited financial resources.4.Nuclear Proliferation Risks:The technology and materials used in nuclear power can potentially be diverted for the development of nuclear weapons,raising international security concerns.The Role of Nuclear Energy in the Global Energy MixNuclear energy is a complex and controversial component of the global energy mix. While it offers a significant source of lowcarbon power,the risks associated with its use have led to a reevaluation of its role in the energy sector.Economic Factors:The cost of nuclear power has been a contentious issue,with some arguing that the high initial costs and long construction times make it less competitive compared to other energy sources,such as natural gas or renewable energy.Public Perception:Public opinion on nuclear power varies widely,with some advocating for its expansion as a means to combat climate change,while others call for a phasing out due to safety and environmental concerns.Policy and Regulation:Governments around the world have different stances on nuclear power,with some promoting its development and others imposing strict regulations or even banning it altogether.ConclusionNuclear energy is a doubleedged sword,offering a potent source of power with the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions,but also presenting serious safety and environmental challenges.As the world seeks sustainable energy solutions,the debate over the role of nuclear power will continue to be a critical part of the conversation on how to meet our energy needs while protecting our planet.The future of nuclear energy may lie in advancements in technology,such as the development of safer reactor designs and more effective waste management solutions,which could help to mitigate the risks and harness the benefits of this powerful energy source.。
接触到核物理英语作文Title: Exploring the Depths of Nuclear Physics。
Nuclear physics stands as one of the most fascinating and complex branches of science, delving into the inner workings of atomic nuclei, their interactions, and the immense energy they possess. In this essay, we embark on a journey to explore the intricacies of nuclear physics, from its fundamental principles to its diverse applications in various fields.At its core, nuclear physics examines the structure and behavior of atomic nuclei, which are composed of protons and neutrons bound together by the strong nuclear force. Understanding the forces that govern these tiny yet powerful entities is essential for comprehending the nature of matter and energy on a fundamental level.One of the key concepts in nuclear physics is nuclear reactions, wherein nuclei undergo transformations, leadingto the release or absorption of energy. These reactions can take various forms, including fusion and fission. Fusion involves the merging of lighter nuclei to form heavier ones, releasing vast amounts of energy in the process, as exemplified by the reactions occurring in the core of stars. On the other hand, fission entails the splitting of heavy nuclei into smaller fragments, accompanied by the releaseof energy, as witnessed in nuclear power plants and atomic bombs.The study of nuclear physics has far-reaching implications across multiple disciplines. In astrophysics, nuclear processes govern the behavior of stars, dictating their lifespan, energy output, and eventual fate. Understanding these processes enables scientists to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos and comprehend phenomena suchas supernovae and black holes.In the realm of medicine, nuclear physics plays acrucial role in diagnostic imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). These imagingmodalities rely on the detection of radioactive tracers injected into the body, allowing physicians to visualize and diagnose various conditions, including cancer and neurological disorders, with remarkable precision.Furthermore, nuclear physics finds applications in energy production, with nuclear power serving as a viable alternative to fossil fuels. Nuclear reactors harness the energy released from fission reactions to generate electricity, offering a reliable and relatively low-carbon source of power. However, the proliferation of nuclear technology also raises concerns about safety, waste management, and the potential for nuclear proliferation, highlighting the importance of stringent regulations and international cooperation in this field.In particle physics, nuclear collisions provideinsights into the fundamental forces and constituents of matter, allowing scientists to probe the building blocks of the universe at the smallest scales. Accelerators such as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) facilitate experiments that recreate conditions akin to those in the early universe,shedding light on phenomena such as the Higgs boson and dark matter.In conclusion, nuclear physics stands as a cornerstone of scientific inquiry, offering profound insights into the nature of matter, energy, and the universe itself. From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to powering our cities and healing the sick, its applications are as diverse as they are impactful. As we continue to push the boundaries of knowledge, the principles of nuclear physics will undoubtedly remain at the forefront of scientific exploration and innovation.。
Nuclear EngineeringNuclear engineering is a field that is both fascinating and controversial. It involves the study and application of nuclear energy, including the design and maintenance of nuclear power plants, as well as the development of nuclear weapons. This field has the potential to provide clean and abundant energy, but it also raises concerns about safety, environmental impact, and the proliferation ofnuclear weapons. In this response, I will explore the various perspectives on nuclear engineering, including its benefits, drawbacks, and ethical considerations. From a technological perspective, nuclear engineering offers several advantages. Nuclear power plants can generate large amounts of electricity without producing greenhouse gases, making them a potentially valuable tool in the fight against climate change. Additionally, nuclear energy is incredibly dense, meaning that a small amount of nuclear fuel can produce a large amount of energy. This makes nuclear power plants highly efficient and cost-effective in the long run. Furthermore, nuclear engineering has applications beyond energy production,including medical imaging and cancer treatment, as well as the potential for space exploration and colonization. Despite these advantages, nuclear engineering also presents significant challenges and risks. One of the most pressing concerns isthe issue of nuclear safety. Accidents such as the Chernobyl disaster and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster have demonstrated the potential forcatastrophic failure in nuclear power plants, with devastating consequences for human health and the environment. Additionally, the long-term storage and disposal of nuclear waste remains a major unresolved issue, as radioactive materials can remain hazardous for thousands of years. Furthermore, the proliferation of nuclear weapons is a significant ethical concern, as the technology and expertisedeveloped for peaceful purposes can also be used for destructive ends. From an ethical perspective, nuclear engineering raises complex and difficult questions.On one hand, nuclear energy has the potential to provide clean and abundant powerto millions of people, lifting them out of poverty and improving their quality of life. On the other hand, the risks associated with nuclear power, including the potential for accidents and the production of nuclear weapons, raise seriousethical concerns. Additionally, the environmental impact of nuclear energy,including the mining and processing of uranium, as well as the long-term storageof nuclear waste, must be carefully considered. Another perspective to consideris the social and political implications of nuclear engineering. The development and deployment of nuclear technology are heavily influenced by geopolitical considerations, with powerful nations seeking to maintain their influence and control over this potentially transformative technology. This has led to concerns about the spread of nuclear weapons and the potential for nuclear conflict. Additionally, the construction and operation of nuclear power plants can have significant impacts on local communities, including issues of land use, environmental justice, and economic development. In conclusion, nuclear engineering is a complex and multifaceted field that offers both promise and peril. While nuclear energy has the potential to provide clean and abundant power, italso raises serious concerns about safety, environmental impact, and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. From a technological perspective, nuclear engineering offers several advantages, but it also presents significant challenges and risks. From an ethical perspective, nuclear engineering raises complex and difficult questions, and it has social and political implications that must be carefully considered. As we continue to grapple with these issues, it is essential that we approach nuclear engineering with a clear-eyed understanding of its potential and its pitfalls, and that we engage in thoughtful and informed dialogue about its role in our world.。
核能的建议英文作文I think nuclear energy is a controversial topic. On one hand, it can provide a large amount of energy withrelatively low carbon emissions. On the other hand, the disposal of nuclear waste and the potential for accidents are major concerns.I believe that nuclear energy can be a part of the solution to our energy needs, but it should not be the only solution. We need to invest in renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power, as well as improve energy efficiency in order to reduce our reliance on nuclear energy.In my opinion, the safety of nuclear power plants is a top priority. We need to ensure that strict safety regulations are in place and that the plants are regularly inspected and maintained to prevent accidents.I also think that the issue of nuclear waste disposalneeds to be addressed. We need to invest in research and development of safe and effective methods for storing and disposing of nuclear waste.In conclusion, I believe that nuclear energy can play a role in our energy future, but we need to approach it with caution and carefully consider the potential risks and drawbacks. We should also continue to explore and invest in alternative energy sources to create a more sustainable and secure energy future.。
关于核能的英文阅读The Promise and Challenges of Nuclear Energy.Nuclear energy has long held the promise of being a sustainable and efficient source of power. It generates a large amount of energy from relatively small amounts of fuel, making it a dense energy source. However, this same characteristic that makes nuclear energy attractive also poses significant challenges, including safety concerns, waste disposal issues, and the cost of building and maintaining nuclear reactors.The Basics of Nuclear Energy.At its core, nuclear energy is derived from thesplitting of atoms, a process known as nuclear fission. In a nuclear reactor, uranium or plutonium atoms are bombarded with neutrons, causing them to split into smaller particles and release energy. This energy is then harnessed to generate heat, which in turn produces steam that powersturbines to generate electricity.Advantages of Nuclear Energy.One of the primary advantages of nuclear energy is its efficiency. Nuclear reactors can produce large amounts of energy from relatively small amounts of fuel. In fact, a single reactor can generate enough electricity to power a city for an entire year. This makes nuclear energy a highly dense source of power that can help meet the increasing global demand for electricity.Another benefit is that nuclear energy produces no greenhouse gas emissions during the generation of electricity. This makes it an environmentally friendly option compared to fossil fuels, which release carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.Challenges of Nuclear Energy.Despite its advantages, nuclear energy also presents significant challenges. The most notable is the safetyconcern. Nuclear reactors require strict safety measures to prevent accidents that could release radioactive materials into the environment. These accidents, such as the meltdowns at the Chernobyl plant in 1986 and the Fukushima Daiichi plant in 2011, have raised concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants.Another challenge is the disposal of radioactive waste. Nuclear waste contains highly radioactive materials that can pose a threat to human health and the environment for thousands of years. Currently, there is no widely accepted method for safely disposing of this waste, and it remains a significant obstacle to the widespread adoption of nuclear energy.The cost of building and maintaining nuclear reactors is also considerable. Nuclear power plants are expensive to construct, and their operation requires a highly skilled workforce and strict safety regulations. Additionally, the long-term costs of decommissioning reactors and managing radioactive waste add to the financial burden.The Future of Nuclear Energy.Despite these challenges, nuclear energy remains a viable option for meeting global energy demands. Advances in technology and safety measures have made nuclear reactors safer and more efficient. For example, Generation IV reactors are being developed to address the challenges of waste disposal and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. These reactors are designed to use fuels that produce less waste and are inherently safer due to their ability to shut down in the event of an emergency.In addition, the need for decarbonization and the transition to renewable energy sources is driving interest in nuclear energy as a low-carbon alternative to fossil fuels. Nuclear energy can play a key role in balancing the grid and providing baseload power, especially when paired with renewable energy sources like solar and wind.However, the future of nuclear energy will depend on addressing the challenges it faces. This includes developing safer reactor designs, finding effective ways todispose of radioactive waste, and reducing the cost of building and maintaining nuclear power plants.Conclusion.Nuclear energy has the potential to be a sustainable and efficient source of power that can help meet the global demand for electricity while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, it faces significant challenges in terms of safety, waste disposal, and cost. Addressing these challenges and developing innovative solutions will be key to the future of nuclear energy. As we continue to explore and develop new technologies, it is important to weigh the benefits and risks of nuclear energy to ensure that we make informed decisions about our energy future.。
a r X i v :0805.4613v 2 [h e p -p h ] 1 A u g 2008Gluon Shadowing in DIS offNucleiB.Z.Kopeliovich 1,2,J.Nemchik 3,4,I.K.Potashnikova 1,2and Ivan Schmidt 11Departamento de F´ısica y Centro de Estudios Subat´o micos,Universidad T´e cnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa,Valpara´ıso,Chile 2Joint Intitute for Nuclear Research,Dubna,Russia 3Institute of Experimental Physics SAS,Watsonova 47,04001Kosice,Slovakia 4Czech Technical University,FNSPE,Brehova 7,11519Praque,Czech Republic Abstract Within a light-cone quantum-chromodynamics dipole formalism based on the Green function technique,we study nuclear shadowing in deep-inelastic scattering at small Bjorken x Bj ∼<0.01.Such a formalism incorporates naturally color transparency and coherence length effects.Calculations of the nuclear shadowing for the ¯q q Fock compo-nent of the photon are based on an exact numerical solution of the evolution equation for the Green function,using a realistic form of the dipole cross section and nuclear den-sity function.Such an exact numerical solution is unavoidable for x Bj ∼>10−4,when avariation of the transverse size of the ¯q q Fock component must be taken into account.The eikonal approximation,used so far in most other models,can be applied only athigh energies,when x Bj ∼<10−4and the transverse size of the ¯q q Fock component is ”frozen”during propagation through the nuclear matter.At x Bj ≤0.01we find quite a large contribution of gluon suppression to nuclear shadowing,as a shadowing correction for the higher Fock states containing gluons.Numerical results for nuclear shadowing are compared with the available data from the E665and NMC collaborations.Nuclear shadowing is also predicted at very small x Bj corresponding to LHC kinematical range.Finally the model predictions are compared and discussed with the results obtained from other models.11IntroductionNuclear shadowing in deep-inelastic scattering(DIS)offnuclei is usually studied via nuclear structure functions.In the shadowing region of small Bjorken x Bj∼<0.01the structure function F2per nucleon turns out to be smaller in nuclei than in a free nucleon(see the review[1],for example).This affects then the corresponding study of nuclear effects,mainly in connection with the interpretation of the results coming from hadron-nucleus and heavy ion experiments.Nuclear shadowing,intensively investigated during the last two decades,can be treated differently depending on the reference frame.In the infinite momentum frame of the nucleus it can be interpreted as a result of parton fusion[2,3,4,5],leading to a reduction of the parton density at low Bjorken x Bj.In the rest frame of the nucleus,however,this phenomenon looks like nuclear shadowing of the hadronicfluctuations of the virtual photon,and occurs due to their multiple scattering inside the target[6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].Although these two physical interpretations are complementary,the one based on the rest frame of the nucleus is more intuitive and straightforward.The dynamics of nuclear shadowing in DIS is controlled by the effect of quantum coherence, which results from the destructive interference of amplitudes for which the interaction takes place on different bound nucleons.Taking into account the|¯q q Fock component of the photon, quantum coherence can be characterized by the lifetime of the¯q qfluctuation,which in turn can be estimated by relying on the uncertainty principle and Lorentz time dilation as,2νt c=quite a large difference in comparison with approximate calculations[19,17]obtained within the harmonic oscillator Green function approach,in the kinematic region when l c∼<R A(R A is the nuclear radius).However,no comparison with data was performed using this path integral technique based on an exact numerical solution of the two-dimensional Schr¨o dinger equation for the Green function.This is one of the main goals of the present paper.Such a comparison with data provides a better baseline for future studies of the QCD dynamics,not only in DIS offnuclei but also in further processes occurring in lepton(proton)-nucleus interactions and in heavy-ion collisions.The calculations of nuclear shadowing in DIS offnuclei presented so far within the light-cone(LC)Green function approach[19,17,18]were performed assuming only¯q qfluctuations of the photon,and neglecting higher Fock components containing gluons and sea quarks.The effects of higher Fock states are included in the energy dependence of the dipole cross section,σ¯q q( r,s)1.However,as soon as nuclear effects are considered,these Fock states|¯q qG ,|¯q q2G ...,lead to gluon shadowing(GS),which for simplicity has been neglected so far when the model predictions were compared with experimental data.The contribution of the gluon suppression to nuclear shadowing represents a shadowing correction for the multigluon higher Fock states. It was shown in ref.[24]that GS becomes effective at small x Bj∼<0.01.The present available experimental data cover the shadowing region∼0.0001∼<x Bj∼<0.01,and therefore the contribution of GS to the overall nuclear shadowing should be included.This is a further goal of the present paper.Different(but equivalent)descriptions of GS are known,depending on the reference frame. In the infinite momentum frame of the nucleus it looks like fusion of gluons,which overlap in the longitudinal direction at small x Bj,leading to a reduction of the gluon density.In the rest frame of the nucleus the same phenomenon looks as a specific part of Gribov’s inelastic corrections [25].The lowest order inelastic correction related to diffractive dissociationγ∗N→X N[26] contains PPR and PPP contributions(in terms of the triple-Regge phenomenology,see[27]). The former is related to quark shadowing,while the latter,the triple-Pomeron term,corresponds to gluon shadowing.Indeed,only diffractive gluon radiation can provide the M X dependence dσdd/dM2X∝1/M2X of the diffractive dissociation cross section.In terms of the light-cone QCD approach the same process is related to the inclusion of higher Fock components,|¯q q nG , containing gluons[28].Suchfluctuations might be quite heavy compared to the simplest|¯q q fluctuation,and therefore have a shorter lifetime(see Eq.(1)),and need higher energies to be relevant.Calculations of the GS contribution to nuclear suppression have been already performed within the light-cone QCD approach,for both coherent and incoherent production of vector mesons[20,21],and also for production of Drell-Yan pairs[17].They showed(except for the specific case of incoherent production of vector mesons)that GS is a non-negligible effect, especially for heavy nuclear targets at small and medium values of photon virtualities Q2∼<a few GeV2and at large photon energiesν.This is another reason to include the effect of GS for the calculation of nuclear shadowing,especially for making more realistic comparison of the predictions with experimental data.Notice also that by investigating shadowing in the region of small x Bj∼<0.01we can safely omit the nuclear antishadowing effect assumed to be beyond the shadowing dynamics[8,9].The paper is organized as follows.In the next Section2we present a short description of thelight-cone dipole phenomenology for nuclear shadowing in DIS,together with the Green function formalism.In Section3we discuss how gluon shadowing modifies the total photoabsorption cross section on a nucleus.In Section4numerical results are presented and compared with experimental data,and also with the results from other models,in a broad range of x Bj.Finally, in Section5we summarize our main results and discuss the possibility of future experimental evidence of the GS contribution to the overall nuclear shadowing in DIS at small values of x Bj. 2Light-cone dipole approach to nuclear shadowingIn the rest frame of the nucleus the nuclear shadowing in the total virtual photoabsorptioncross sectionσγ∗Atot (x Bj,Q2)(or in the structure function F A2(x Bj,Q2))can be decomposed overdifferent Fock components of the virtual photon.Then the total photoabsorption cross section on a nucleus can be formally represented in the formσγ∗A tot (x Bj,Q2)=Aσγ∗Ntot(x Bj,Q2)−∆σtot(x Bj,Q2),(2)where∆σtot(x Bj,Q2)=∆σtot(¯q q)+∆σtot(¯q qG)+∆σtot(¯q q2G)+·.(3) Here the Bjorken variable x Bj is given byx Bj=Q2Q2+s,(4)where s is theγ∗-nucleon center of mass(c.m.)energy squared,m N is mass of the nucleon, andσγ∗Ntot(x Bj,Q2)in(2)is total photoabsorption cross section on a nucleonσγ∗Ntot(x Bj,Q2)= d2r 10dα Ψ¯q q( r,α,Q2) 2σ¯q q( r,s).(5)In this last expressionσ¯q q( r,s)is the dipole cross section,which depends on the¯q q transverse separation r and the c.m.energy squared s,andΨ¯q q( r,α,Q2)is the LC wave function of the¯q q Fock component of the photon,which depends also on the photon virtuality Q2and the relative shareαof the photon momentum carried by the quark.Notice that x Bj is related to the c.m. energy squared s via Eq.(4).Consequently,hereafter we will write the energy dependence of variables in subsequent formulas also via an x Bj-dependence whenever convenient.The total photoabsorption cross section on a nucleon target(5)contains two ingredients. Thefirst ingredient is given by the dipole cross sectionσ¯q q( r,s),representing the interaction of a¯q q dipole of transverse separation r with a nucleon[29].It is aflavor independent universal function of r and energy,and allows to describe various high energy processes in an uniform way. It is also known to vanish quadraticallyσ¯q q(r,s)∝r2as r→0,due to color screening(property of color transparency[29,30,31]),and cannot be predicted reliably because of poorly known higher order perturbative QCD(pQCD)corrections and nonperturbative effects.However, it can be extracted from experimental data on DIS and structure functions using reasonable parametrizations,and in this case pQCD corrections and nonperturbative effects are naturally included inσ¯q q(r,s).There are two popular parameterizations ofσ¯q q( r,s):GBW presented in[32],and KST proposed in[24].Detailed discussions and comparison of these two parametrizations can be4found in refs.[23,20,18].Whereas the GBW parametrization cannot be applied in the non-perturbative region of Q2,the KST parametrization gives a good description of the transition down to the limit of real photoproduction,Q2=0.Because we will study the shadowing region of small x Bj∼<0.01,where available experimental data from the E665and NMC collaborations cover small and moderate values of Q2∼<2÷3GeV2,we will prefer the latter parametrization.The KST parametrization[24]has the following form,which contains an explicit dependence on energy,σ¯q q(r,s)=σ0(s) 1−exp −r28 r2ch π,(7)whereσπp tot(s)=23.6(s/s0)0.079+1.432(s/s0)−0.45mb,which contains the Pomeron and Reggeon parts of theπp total cross section[33],and R0(s)=0.88(s/s0)−λ/2fm,withλ=0.28and where s0=1000GeV2is the energy-dependent radius.In Eq.(7) r2ch π=0.44fm2is the mean pion charge radius squared.The form of Eq.(6)successfully describes the data for DIS at small x Bj only up to Q2≈10GeV2.Nevertheless,this interval of Q2is sufficient for the purpose of the present paper,which is focused on the study of nuclear shadowing at small x Bj∼<0.01in the kinematic range Q2∼<4GeV2covered by available E665and NMC data.However,as we will present the predictions for nuclear shadowing at very small x Bj down to 10−7accesible by the prepared experiments at LHC and at larger values of Q2∼>10GeV2,we will use also the second GBW parametrization[32]of the dipole cross section.The second ingredient ofσγ∗Ntot (x Bj,Q2)in(5)is the perturbative distribution amplitude(“wave function”)of the¯q q Fock component of the photon.For transversely(T)and longitu-dinally(L)polarized photons it has the form[34,35,10]:ΨT,L¯q q( r,α,Q2)=√2πZ q¯χˆO T,LχK0(ǫr)(8)whereχand¯χare the spinors of the quark and antiquark respectively,Z q is the quark charge, N C=3is the number of colors,and K0(ǫr)is a modified Bessel function withǫ2=α(1−α)Q2+m2q,(9) where m q is the quark mass.The operators O T,L read,O T=m q σ· e+i(1−2α)( σ· n)( e· ∇r)+( σ× e)· ∇r,(10)O L=2Qα(1−α)( σ· n).(11) Here ∇r acts on the transverse coordinate r, e is the polarization vector of the photon, n is a unit vector parallel to the photon momentum,and σis the three vector of the Pauli spin-matrices.The distribution amplitude Eq.(8)controls the transverse¯q q separation with the mean valuer ∼1For very asymmetric¯q q pairs withαor(1−α)∼<m2q/Q2the mean transverse separation r ∼1/m q becomes huge,since one must use current quark masses within pQCD.A pop-ular recipe tofix this problem is to introduce an effective quark mass m eff∼ΛQCD,which represents the nonperturbative interaction effects between the q and¯q.It is more consistent and straightforward,however,to introduce this interaction explicitly through a phenomenology based on the light-cone Green function approach,and which has been developed in[24].The Green function G¯q q( r2,z2; r1,z1)describes the propagation of an interacting¯q q pair between points with longitudinal coordinates z1and z2and with initial andfinal separations r1and r2.This Green function satisfies the two-dimensional Schr¨o dinger equation,i d2να(1−α)+V¯q q(z2, r2,α) G¯q q( r2,z2; r1,z1),(13)with the boundary conditionG¯q q( r2,z2; r1,z1)|z2=z1=δ2( r1− r2).(14) In Eq.(13)νis the photon energy and the Laplacian∆r acts on the coordinate r.We start with the propagation of a¯q q pair in vacuum.The LC potential V¯q q(z2, r2,α)in(13) contains only the real part,which is responsible for the interaction between the q and¯q.For the sake of simplicity we use an oscillator form of this potential.Although more realistic models for the real part of the potential are available[36,37],however,solution of the corresponding Schr¨o dinger equation for the light-cone Green function is a challenge.Analytic solution has been known so far only for the oscillator potential.Otherwise one has to solve the Schr¨o dinger equation numerically,which needs a dedicated study.On the other hand,important is the mean¯q q transverse separation which isfitted to diffrac-tion data.Any form of the potential must comply with this condition.The same restriction is imposed on the quark-gluon Fock states.The mean quark-gluon separation,which matters for shadowing,isfixed by high-mass diffraction data and should not be much affected by the choice of a model for the potential.Re V¯q q(z2, r2,α)=a4(α) r222πi sin(ω∆z)exp i a2(α)2να(1−α) ,(16) where∆z=z2−z1,andω=a2(α)The probability amplitude tofind the¯q qfluctuation of a photon at the point z2with separation r,is given by an integral over the point z1where the¯q q is created by the photon with initial separation zero,ΨT,L¯q q( r,α)=i Z q√4πEα(1−α)z2−∞dz1 ¯χ O T,Lχ G¯q q( r,z2; r1,z1) r1=0.(18)The operators O T,L are defined by Eqs.(10)and(11),and here they act on the coordinate r1.If we write the transverse part as¯χ O Tχ=¯χm c σ· eχ+¯χ[i(1−2α)( σ· n) e+( σ× e)]χ· ∇r=E+ F· ∇r,(19) then the distribution functions read,ΨT¯q q( r,α)=Z q√αem Qα(1−α)¯χ σ· nχΦ0(ǫ,r,λ),(21) whereλ=2a2(α)4π∞0dtλ4cth(λt)−t ,(23)Φ1(ǫ,r,λ)=ǫ2 rsh(λt)2exp −λǫ2r2The matrix element(5)contains the LC wave function squared,which has the following form for T and L polarizations,in the limit of vanishing interaction between¯q and q, ΨT¯q q( r,α,Q2) 2=2N Cαem(2π)2N ff=1Z2f Q2α2(1−α)2K0(ǫr)2,(28)where K1is the modified Bessel function,K1(z)=−d2Re d2b ∞−∞dz1ρA(b,z1) ∞z1dz2ρA(b,z2) 10dαA(z1,z2,α),(32) withA(z1,z2,α)= d2r2Ψ∗¯q q( r2,α,Q2)σ¯q q(r2,s) d2r1G¯q q( r2,z2; r1,z1)σ¯q q(r1,s)Ψ¯q q( r1,α,Q2).(33)When nonpertubative interaction effects between the¯q and q are explicitly included,one should replace in Eq.(33)Ψ¯q q( r,α,Q2)=⇒Ψnpt( r,α,Q2)andΨ∗¯q q( r,α,Q2)=⇒Ψ∗npt( r,α,Q2).In Eq.(32)ρA(b,z)represents the nuclear density function defined at the point with longi-tudinal coordinate z and impact parameter b.The shadowing term∆σtot(x Bj,Q2)=∆σtot(¯q q)in(2)is illustrated in Fig.1.At the point z1the initial photon diffractively produces the¯q q pair(γ∗N→¯q qN)with transverse separation r1.The¯q q pair then propagates through the nucleus along arbitrary curved trajectories,which8Figure 1:A cartoon for the shadowing term ∆σtot (x Bj ,Q 2)=∆σtot (¯q q )in (2).Propagation ofthe¯q q pair through the nucleus is described bythe Green function G ¯q q ( r2,z 2; r 1,z 1),which results from the summation over different paths of the ¯q q pair.are summed over,and arrives at the point z 2with transverse separation r 2.The initial and final separations are controlled by the LC wave function of the ¯q q Fock component of thephoton Ψ¯q q (r ,α,Q 2).During propagation through the nucleus the ¯q q pair interacts with bound nucleons via the dipole cross section σ¯q q (r,s ),which depends on the local transverse separation r .The Green function G ¯q q ( r2,z 2; r 1,z 1)describes the propagation of the ¯q q pair from z 1to z 2.Describing the propagation of the ¯q q pair in a nuclear medium,the Green function G ¯q q ( r2,z 2; r 1,z 1)satisfies again the time-dependent two-dimensional Schr¨o dinger equation (13).However,the potential in this case acquires in addition an imaginary part.This imaginary part of the LC potential V ¯q q (z 2,r 2,α)in Eq.(13)is responsible for the attenuation of the ¯q q photon fluctuation in the medium,and has the following formImV ¯q q (z 2, r ,α)=−σ¯q q (r ,s )να(1−α)= να(1−α).(37)9The determination of the energy dependent factor C(s)in Eq.(35)and the mean nuclear densityρ0in Eq.(36)can be realized by the procedure described in[17,23,18],and will be discussed below.Investigating nuclear shadowing in DIS one can distinguish between two regimes,depending on the value of the coherence length:(i)We start with the general case when there are no restrictions for l c.If l c∼R A one has to take into account the variation of the transverse size r during propagation of the¯q q pair through the nucleus,which is naturally included using a correct quantum-mechanical treatment based on the Green function formalism presented above.The overall total photoabsorption cross sectionon a nucleus is given as a sum over T and L polarizations,σγ∗A=σγ∗AT +ǫ′σγ∗AL,assuming thatthe photon polarizationǫ′=1.If one takes into account only the¯q q Fock component of the photon,the full expression after summation over allflavors,colors,helicities and spin states becomes[42]σγ∗A(x Bj,Q2)=Aσγ∗N(x Bj,Q2)−∆σ(x Bj,Q2)=A d2r 10dασ¯q q(r,s) ΨT¯q q( r,α,Q2) 2+ ΨL¯q q( r,α,Q2) 2−N Cαemr1r2K1(ǫr1)K1(ǫr2)(38)+ m2f+4Q2α2(1−α)2 K0(ǫr1)K0(ǫr2) G¯q q( r2,z2; r1,z1).Here ΨT,L¯q q( r,α,Q2) 2are the absolute squares of the LC wave functions for the¯q qfluctuation of T and L polarized photons,summed over allflavors,and with the form given by Eqs.(27) and(28),respectively.If one takes into account the nonperturbative interaction effects between¯q and q of the virtual photon the expression forσγ∗A(x Bj,Q2)Eq.(38)takes the following form:σγ∗A npt (x Bj,Q2)=Aσγ∗Nnpt(x Bj,Q2)−∆σnpt(x Bj,Q2)=A d2r 10dασ¯q q(r,s) ΨT npt( r,α,Q2) 2+ ΨL npt( r,α,Q2) 2−N CαemN ff=1Z2f Re d2b ∞−∞dz1 ∞z1dz2 10dα d2r1 d2r2×ρA(b,z1)ρA(b,z2)σ¯q q(r2,s)σ¯q q(r1,s)× α2+(1−α)2 Φ1(ǫ,r1,λ)· Φ1(ǫ,r2,λ)(39)+ m2f+4Q2α2(1−α)2 Φ0(ǫ,r1,λ)Φ0(ǫ,r2,λ) G¯q q( r2,z2; r1,z1).where ΨT,L npt( r,α,Q2) 2are now given by Eqs.(30)and(31),respectively.10(ii)The CL is much larger than the mean nucleon spacing in a nucleus (l c ≫R A ),which is the high energy limit.Correspondingly,the transverse separation r between ¯q and q does not vary during propagation through the nucleus (Lorentz time dilation).In this case the eikonal formula for the total photoabsorption cross section on a nucleus can be obtained as a limiting case of the Green function formalism.Indeed,in the high energy limit ν→∞,the kinetic term in Eq.(13)can be neglected and the Green function reads G ¯q q (b ; r 2,z 2; r 1,z 1)|ν→∞=δ( r 2− r 1)exp −12σ¯q q (r,s )T A (b ) ×2N C αemN f f =1Z 2f α2+(1−α)2 Φ1(ǫ,r,λ)2(41)+m 2f +4Q 2α2(1−α)2 Φ20(ǫ,r,λ) ,whereT A (b )=∞−∞dz ρA (b,z )(42)is the nuclear thickness calculated with the realistic Wood-Saxon form of the nuclear density,with parameters taken from [43].At the photon polarization parameter ǫ′=1the structure function ratio F A 2/F N 2is relatedto nuclear shadowing R (A/N and can be expressed via a ratio of the total photoabsorption cross sectionsF A 2(x Bj ,Q 2)σγ∗N T (x Bj ,Q 2)+σγ∗N L (x Bj ,Q 2),(43)where the numerator on the right-hand side (r.h.s.)is given by Eq.(39),whereas the denomi-nator can be expressed as the first term of Eq.(39)divided by the mass number A .As we already mentioned above,an explicit analytical expression for the Green function G ¯q q ( r2,z 2; r 1,z 1)(16)can be found only for the quadratic form of the dipole cross section (35),and for uniform nuclear density function (36).It was shown in refs.[19,23,17,18]that suchan approximation gives results of reasonable accuracy,especially at small x Bj ∼<10−4andfor heavy nuclei.Nevertheless,it can be even more precise if one considers the fact that the expression (41)in the high energy limit can be easily calculated using realistic parametrizations of the dipole cross section (see Eq.(6)for the KST parametrization and ref.[32]for the GBW parametrization)and a realistic nuclear density function ρA (b,z )[43].Consequently,one needs to know the full Green function only in the transition region from non-shadowing (x Bj ∼0.1)to a fully developed shadowing given when coherence length l c ≫R A ,which corresponds tox Bj ∼<10−4depending on the value of Q 2.Therefore,the value of the energy dependent factor C (s )in Eq.(35)can be determined by the procedure described in refs.[17,23,20].According to this procedure,the factor C (s )is adjusted by demanding that calculations employing theapproximation (35)reproduce correctly the results for nuclear shadowing in DIS basedon the realistic parametrizations of the dipole cross section Eq.(6)in the limit l c ≫R A ,when the Green function takes the simple form (40).Consequently,the factor C (s )is fixed by the relationd 2b d 2r Ψ¯q q ( r ,α,Q 2) 2 1−exp −1 d 2r Ψ¯q q ( r ,α,Q 2) 2C (s )r 2= d 2bd 2r Ψ¯q q ( r ,α,Q 2) 2 1−exp −1 d 2r Ψ¯q q ( r ,α,Q 2) 2σ¯q q (r,s ).(44)Correspondingly,the value ρ0of the uniform nuclear density (36)is fixed in an analogous way using the following relationd 2b 1−exp −σ0ρ0 2σ0T A (b ) ,(45)where the value of ρ0was found to be practically independent of the cross section σ0,when this changed from 1to 50mb [17,23].Such a procedure for the determination of the factors C (s )and ρ0was applied also in refs.[20,21],in the case of incoherent and coherent production of vector mesons offnuclei.In order to remove the above mentioned uncertainties the evolution equation for the Green function was solved numerically for the first time in ref.[18].Such an exact solution can be performed for arbitrary parametrization of the dipole cross section and for realistic nuclear density functions,although the nice analytical form for the Green function is lost in this case.In the process of numerical solution of the Schr¨o dinger equation (13)for the Green function G ¯q q ( r2,z 2; r 1,z 1)with the initial condition (14),it is much more convenient to use the following substitutions [18]g 0( r 2,z 2;z 1,λ)=d 2r 1Φ0(ǫ,r 1,λ)σ¯q q (r 1,s )G ¯q q ( r 2,z 2; r 1,z 1),(46)andr 2dz 2g 0( r 2,z 2;z 1,λ)= 1∂r 22−1∂r 2 +V ¯q q (z 2, r 2,α) g 0( r 2,z 2;z 1,λ)(48)andi d 2µ¯q q ǫ2−∂2r 2∂r 22 +V ¯q q (z 2,r 2,α) g 1( r 2,z 2;z 1,λ),(49)with the boundary conditions g 0( r 2,z 2;z 1,λ)|z 2=z 1=Φ0(ǫ,r 2,λ)σ¯q q (r 2,s )(50)and=˜Φ1(ǫ,r2,λ)σ¯q q(r2,s),(51)g1( r2,z2;z1,λ)|z2=z1where˜Φ1(ǫ,r,λ)is connected with Φ1(ǫ,r,λ)by the following relation:rΦ1(ǫ,r,λ)=the available experimental data reach values of x Bj down to∼10−4,we will include GS in our calculations and show that it is not a negligible effect.Besides,no data for gluon shadowing are available and one has to rely on calculations.In the previous Section2we discussed the nuclear shadowing for the|¯q q Fock component of the photon.It is dominated by the transverse photon polarizations,because the corresponding photoabsorption cross section is scanned at larger dipole sizes than for the longitudinal photon polarization.The transverse¯q q separation is controlled by the distribution amplitude Eq.(8), with the mean value given by Eq.(12).Contributions of large size dipoles come from the asymmetric¯q qfluctuations of the virtual photon,when the quark and antiquark in the photon carry a very large(α→1)and a very small fraction(α→0)of the photon momentum,and vice versa.The LC wave function for longitudinal photons(28)contains a termα2(1−α)2, which makes considerably smaller the contribution from asymmetric¯q q configurations than for transversal photons(see Eq.(27)).Consequently,in contrast to transverse photons,all¯q q dipoles from longitudinal photons have a size squared∝1/Q2and the double-scattering term vanishes as∝1/Q4.The leading-twist contribution for the shadowing of longitudinal photons arises from the|¯q qG Fock component of the photon because the gluon can propagate relatively far from the¯q q pair,although the¯q-q separation is of the order1/Q2.After radiation of the gluon the pair is in an octet state,and consequently the|¯q qG state represents a GG dipole. Then the corresponding correction to the longitudinal cross section is just gluon shadowing.The phenomenon of GS,just as for the case of nuclear shadowing discussed in the Introduc-tion,can be treated differently depending on the reference frame.In the infinite momentum frame this phenomenon looks similar to gluon-gluon fusion,corresponding to a nonlinear term in the evolution equation[45].This effect should lead to a suppression of the small-x Bj gluons also in a nucleon,and lead to a precocious onset of the saturation effects for heavy nuclei. Within a parton model interpretation,in the infinite momentum frame of the nucleus the gluon clouds of nucleons which have the same impact parameter overlap at small x Bj in the longitu-dinal direction.This allows gluons originated from different nucleons to fuse,leading to a gluon density which is not proportional to the density of nucleons any more.This is gluon shadowing.The same phenomenon looks quite different in the rest frame of the nucleus.It corresponds to the process of gluon radiation and shadowing corrections,related to multiple interactions of the radiated gluons in the nuclear medium[28].This is a coherence phenomenon known as the Landau-Pomeranchuk effect,namely the suppression of bremsstrahlung by interference of radiation from different scattering centers,demanding a sufficiently long coherence time of radiation,a condition equivalent to a small Bjorken x Bj in the parton model.Although these two different interpretations are not Lorentz invariant,they represent the same phenomenon,related to the Lorentz invariant Reggeon graphs.It was already discussed in detail in refs.[20,46]that the double-scattering correction to the cross section of gluon radiation can be expressed in Regge theory via the triple-Pomeron diagram.It is interpreted as a fusion of two Pomerons originated from different nucleons,2I P→I P,which leads to a reduction of the nuclear gluon density G A.Notice that in the hadronic representation such a suppression of the parton density cor-responds to Gribov’s inelastic shadowing[25],which is related to the single diffraction cross section.In particular,GS corresponds to the triple-Pomeron term in the diffractive dissociation cross section,which enters the calculations of inelastic corrections.There are still very few numerical evaluations of gluon shadowing in the literature,all of them done in the rest frame of the nucleus,using the idea from ref.[28].As was discussed。
想成为一名核物理学家英语作文As a young aspiring scientist, I've always been fascinated by the mysteries of the universe. And among all the branches of physics, nuclear physics holds a special place in my heart. It's not just the fascinating complexity of atomic nuclei that intrigues me, but also the potential they hold for the future of energy and technology.You know, growing up watching documentaries about particle accelerators and nuclear reactions, I felt like I was part of a secret club. I wanted to unlock the secretsof these tiny but mighty particles that make up our world. Nuclear physics is like a puzzle with endless pieces, andI'm eager to put them all together.Studying nuclear physics means delving into the unknown. Every experiment, every calculation, feels like a journey into the unexplored. It's exciting and challenging, butthat's precisely why I'm drawn to it. I want to be part of the team that discovers new particles, understands theirbehavior, and uses that knowledge to make a difference in the world.Plus, nuclear physics is at the forefront of innovation. From medical imaging to energy production, nuclear technology is changing the way we live. Imagine being ableto contribute to advances that save lives.。
核能英语作文150核能英语作文。
With the rapid development of technology, the use of nuclear energy has become an important topic in the field of energy. Nuclear energy, as a clean and efficient energy source, has the potential to meet the increasing demand for energy in the world. However, the use of nuclear energy also brings about a series of problems and challenges. In this essay, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy, as well as its impact on the environment and society.First and foremost, nuclear energy has several advantages. One of the most significant benefits of nuclear energy is its low environmental impact. Unlike traditional fossil fuels, nuclear energy does not produce greenhouse gases or air pollutants, which helps to reduce airpollution and combat climate change. In addition, nuclear energy is a highly efficient energy source. A small amountof nuclear fuel can produce a large amount of energy, making it a cost-effective option for meeting the energy needs of a growing population. Furthermore, nuclear energy is a reliable and stable source of energy. Unlike solar and wind power, which are dependent on weather conditions, nuclear power plants can operate continuously, providing a consistent supply of energy.However, the use of nuclear energy also has several disadvantages. One of the biggest concerns with nuclear energy is the risk of nuclear accidents. The Fukushima and Chernobyl disasters have highlighted the potential dangers of nuclear power plants, and the long-term environmental and health consequences of these accidents are still being felt today. In addition, the disposal of nuclear waste is a major challenge. Nuclear waste is highly radioactive and can remain hazardous for thousands of years, posing a significant risk to the environment and human health. Furthermore, the proliferation of nuclear weapons is a serious concern. The technology used in nuclear power plants can also be used to produce nuclear weapons, raising the risk of nuclear proliferation and global conflict.In terms of its impact on the environment, the use of nuclear energy has both positive and negative effects. Onthe one hand, nuclear energy is a low-carbon energy source, which can help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. On the other hand, the productionand disposal of nuclear waste can have a significant impact on the environment. The mining and processing of uranium,the fuel used in nuclear power plants, can result in the release of radioactive materials into the environment, contaminating soil and water. In addition, the long-term storage of nuclear waste is a major environmental concern, as the radioactive materials can leach into the surrounding environment, posing a threat to ecosystems and human health.In terms of its impact on society, the use of nuclear energy also has both positive and negative effects. On the one hand, nuclear energy can provide a reliable and stable source of energy, which is essential for economic development and improving living standards. In addition,the development of nuclear energy technology can createjobs and stimulate economic growth. On the other hand, therisk of nuclear accidents and the disposal of nuclear waste can have a significant impact on public health and safety. The fear of nuclear accidents and the potential for nuclear proliferation can also lead to social and political instability.In conclusion, nuclear energy is a complex and controversial topic, with both advantages and disadvantages. While nuclear energy has the potential to provide a clean, efficient, and reliable source of energy, it also poses significant risks to the environment and society. As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of climate change and energy security, it is important to carefully consider the costs and benefits of nuclear energy, and to explore alternative energy sources that can meet theworld's growing energy needs in a sustainable and responsible manner.。
关于核的英语科普作文The Fascinating World of Nuclear ScienceNuclear science is a captivating field that explores the fundamental building blocks of matter - the atomic nucleus. At the heart of every atom lies a dense core composed of protons and neutrons, held together by the immensely powerful strong nuclear force. This force is so mighty that it can bind nucleons together despite the repulsive electromagnetic force between positively charged protons.Nuclear reactions, such as fission and fusion, harness the energy stored within atomic nuclei. In nuclear fission, heavy elements like uranium are split apart, releasing a tremendous amount of energy. This process powers nuclear reactors, providing us with a reliable source of electricity. On the other hand, nuclear fusion involves combining light elements, such as hydrogen, to form heavier ones, a reaction that fuels the sun and other stars.Beyond energy production, nuclear science has numerous applications in medicine, industry, and research. Radioactive isotopes are used in medical imaging and cancer treatment, while nuclear techniques are employed in materials analysis, food preservation, and even archaeology. Moreover, studying the behavior of nuclei under extreme conditions helps us unravel the mysteries of the universe, from the birth of stars to the origins of the elements we find on Earth.As we continue to explore the intriguing world of nuclear science, weunlock new possibilities and deepen our understanding of the fundamental workings of nature. With responsible research and development, nuclear science holds the potential to revolutionize our world and shape a brighter future for humanity.中文翻译:核科学是一门充满魅力的学科,它探索物质的基本组成部分——原子核。
a r X i v :0805.4267v 3 [h e p -p h ] 6 A u g 2008Study of Nuclear Suppression at Large Forward Rapidities in d-Au Collisions atRelativistic and Ultrarelativistic EnergiesJ.Nemchik a,b ,V.Petr´a ˇc ek b ,I.K.Potashnikova c,d ,and M.ˇSumberae a Institute of Experimental Physics SAS,Watsonova 47,04001Koˇs ice,SlovakiabCzech Technical University,FNSPE,Brehova 7,11519Praque,Czech RepubliccDepartamento de F´ısica y Centro de Estudios Subat´o micos,Universidad T´e cnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa,Casilla 110-V,Valpara´ıso,ChiledJoint Institute for Nuclear Research,Dubna,Russiae Nuclear Physics Institute AS CR,25068ˇReˇz /Prague,Czech Republic (Dated:August 6,2008)We study a strong suppression of the relative production rate (d −Au )/(p −p )for inclusive high-p T hadrons of different species at large forward rapidities (large Feynman x F ).The model predictions calculated in the light-cone dipole approach are in a good agreement with the recent measurements by the BRAHMS and STAR Collaborations at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider.We predict a similar suppression at large p T and large x F also at lower energies,where no effect of coherence is possible.It allows to exclude the saturation models or the models based on Color Glass Condensate from interpretation of nuclear effects.PACS numbers:24.85.+p,12.40.Gg,25.40.Ve,25.80.LsI.INTRODUCTIONIn the proton(deuteron)-nucleus collisions,investi-gated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC),re-cent measurements of high-p T particle spectra at large forward rapidities performed recently by the BRAHMS [1,2]and STAR [3]Collaborations show a strong nuclear suppression.The basic explanation for such an effect has been based on an idea that in this kinematic region corresponding to the beam fragmentation region at large Feynman x F one can reach the smallest values of the light-front momentum fraction variable x 2in nuclei.It allows to access the strongest coherence effects such as those associated with shadowing or the Color Glass Con-densate (CGC).It was shown in [4,5]that a considerable nuclear sup-pression for any reaction at large x F (small x 2)is caused by another effects,which can be easily misinterpreted as coherence.Such a suppression,for example,can be treated in terms of the Sudakov form factor reflecting the energy conservation.It is governed by the probability to produce no particles at large x F →1.Nuclear suppression at large x F can be also inter-preted alternatively,as a consequence of a reduced sur-vival probability for large rapidity gap (LRG)processes in nuclei,an enhanced resolution of higher Fock states by nuclei,or an effective energy loss that rises linearly with energy.It was demonstrated in refs.[4,5]that it is a leading twist effect,violating QCD factorization.The BRAHMS Collaboration [1]in 2004for the first time found a substantial nuclear suppression for high-p T negative hadrons produced at large pseudorapidity η=3.2(see Fig.1).Because the data cover rather small x 2∼10−3,the interpretation of such a suppression has been tempted to be as a result of saturation [6,7]or the CGC [8],expected in some models [9].Alternative interpretation of the nuclear effects occur-ring in the BRAHMS data [1]is based on energy con-servation implemented into multiple soft rescatterings of the projectile quark in nuclear matter [4,5].Moreover,new data for neutral pions from the STAR Collaboration have been recently appeared at the same c.m.energy,√2clear suppression in terms of CGC.Because new data of high-p T hadron production at forward rapidities are expected also at smaller c.m.energies√s(x F)scaling of nuclear effects in the energy and pseudorapidity range accessible by the BRAHMS and STAR Collaborations.The results of the paper are summarized and discussed in Sect.IV.II.HIGH-p T HADRON PRODUCTION AT FOR W ARD RAPIDITIES:SUDAKOVSUPPRESSION,PRODUCTION CROSSSECTIONAny hard reaction in the limit x F→1can be treated as LRG process,where gluon radiation is forbidden by en-ergy conservation.If a large-x F particle is produced,the rapidity interval to be kept empty is∆y=−ln(1−x F). Assuming as usual an uncorrelated Poisson distribution for radiated gluons,the Sudakov suppression factor,i.e. the probability to have a rapidity gap∆y,was developed in ref.[4]and has a very simple form,S(x F)=1−x F.(1)Nuclear suppression at x F→1can be formulated as a survival probability of the LRG in multiple interactions with the nucleus.Every additional inelastic interaction contributes an extra suppression factor S(x F).The prob-ability of an n-fold inelastic collision is related to the Glauber model coefficients via the Abramovsky-Gribov-Kancheli(AGK)cutting rules[13].Correspondingly,the survival probability at impact parameter b reads, W hALRG(b)=exp[−σhNinT A(b)]×An=11d2p T dη= q1 z min dz f q/d(p)(x1,q2T)×d2σ[qA(p)]s.The quark distribution func-tions in the nucleon have the form using the lowest order parametrization of Gluck,Reya and Vogt[14].For frag-mentation functions we use parametrization from[15]. The main source of suppression at large p T concerns to multiple quark rescatterings in nuclear matter.The quark distribution in the nucleus can be defined perform-ing summation over multiple interactions and using the probability of an n-fold inelastic collision related to the Glauber model coefficients with Gribov’s corrections via AGK cutting rules[13].It has the following form:f A q/N(x,q2T, b,z)=An=0v n( b,z)f n q/N(x,q2T),(4) where the coefficients v n readsv n( b,z)=σeff T(b,z) n3we separate the contributions characterized by different initial transverse momenta of the projectile partons and sum over different mechanisms of high-p T production. Quark-diquark break up of the proton.Here we consider proton breakup remaining the diquark in-tact,p→ qq+q.We treat the diquark{qq}as point-like and integrate over its momentum.The correspond-ing k T distribution of the projectile valence quark,after propagation through the nucleus at impact parameter b, is iscalculated using the dipole technique developed in refs.[18,19](see also[4]).This contribution dominates the low transverse momentum region k T∼<1GeV. Diquark break upq q→qq.At larger k T the in-teraction resolves the diquark,so its break-up should be included.In this case the valence quark has much larger primordial transverse momentum.Its contribution is cal-culated in accordance with[18,19](see also[4]).Hard gluon radiation q→Gq.At large k T thedipole approach should recover the parton model[20], where high momentum transfer processes occur(in lead-ing order)as binary collisions with the transverse mo-mentum of eachfinal parton of order k T.Therefore,oneshould explicitly include in the dipole description radia-tion of a gluon with large transverse momentum that ap-proximately equilibrates k T,i.e.the process qN→qGX.We employ the nonperturbative quark-gluon wave func-tion developed in[19],which corresponds to small gluonicspots in the nucleon[21,22].Details of calculation of the quark scattering cross section can be found in[4].PARISON WITH DATA Several years ago the BRAHMS collaboration per-formed measurements of nuclear effects at pseudorapidityη=3.2for production of negative hadrons with trans-verse momentum up to p T≈3.5GeV.Instead of the usual Cronin enhancement a suppression was found,asone can see from Fig.1.Rather strong nuclear suppression of data at small p Thas been analysed and interpreted in details in refs.[4,5]and such an analysis does not need to be repeated here. On the other hand we will concentrate on a study of nuclear effects at large p T.Note that the dominance of valence quarks in the pro-jectile proton leads to an isospin-biased ly, high-p T negative hadrons close to the kinematic limit are produced mainly from d,rather than u,quarks.There-fore,more negative hadrons are produced by deuterons than by protons,and this causes an enhancement of the ratio plotted in Fig.1by a factor of3/2.We take care of this by using proper fragmentation functions from[15]. Although the nuclear effects under discussion are not sensitive to p T dependence of the cross section for hadron production in p−p collisions,the model has been al-ready successfully confronted with p−p data from the BRAHMS experiment[1]atη=3.2in refs.[4,5].As the next step,very important for verification of0.20.40.60.811.2pT(GeV)Rd+Au(pT)FIG.1:Ratio,R d+Au(p T),of negative particle production rates in d−Au and p−p collisions as function of p T at pseu-dorapidityη=3.2vs.data from the BRAHMS Collaboration [1].Ratio R d+Au(p T)for neutral pion production atη=4.0 vs.data from the STAR Collaboration[3].Solid and dashed curves correspond to calculations with the diquark size0.3fm and0.2fm respectively.our model,we calculate nuclear effects employing the dipole formalism and the mechanisms described shortly in the previous section(see also[4]).The results are com-pared with the BRAHMS data for the minimum-bias ra-tio R d+Au(p T)[1]in Fig.1.One can see that calculations are in a rather good agreement with data.In the same Fig.1we show also the STAR data for π0production presented as the ratio R d+Au(p T)at pseu-dorapidityη=4.0[3].Data demonstrate that suppres-sion is much stronger than atη=3.2observed by the BRAHMS Collaboration[1].A part of this difference can be explained by an isospin-biased ratio followed from the dominance of valence quarks in the projectile pro-ton(deuteron).Whereas more negative hadrons are pro-duced by deuterons than by protons,for positive hadrons the situation is opposite.For production of negative hadrons,it leads to an en-hancement of the ratio R d+Au(p T)by a factor of3/2in comparison with R p+Au(p T).However,for production of positive hadrons one arrives to a suppression by a factor of3/4.As a result,forπ0mesons one gets for R d+Au(p T) a small overall suppression factor=5/6,which is smaller than a factor of3/2for negative hadrons.However,such a difference following from the isospin effects can explain only a minor part from a huge difference in nuclear sup-pressions experimentally observed atη=3.2and4.0by the BRAHMS[1]and STAR[3]Collaborations,respec-tively.If one supposes to interpret the nuclear effects of high-40.20.40.60.811.2p T (GeV)R d +A u (p T )FIG.2:Model predictions for nuclear attenuation factor R d +Au (p T )as a function of transverse momentum for pro-duction of π0mesons at√s =200GeV.Changingthe value of ηfrom 3.0to 4.0,one can see a large rise of nuclear suppression about a factor of 2.The BRAHMS Collaboration has recently reported new data [2]measuring nuclear effects for production of different species of hadrons at η=3.0in d +Au colli-sions.These new data confirm a substantial nuclear sup-pression,which is similar to what has been found already in 2004[1].Using proper fragmentation functions from [15],we present in Fig.3the model predictions together with the last BRAHMS data at η=3.0for production of π+and K +mesons.One can see again a reasonable agreement of the model with data.00.20.40.60.811.2R d +A u (p T )00.20.40.60.8100.511.522.533.544.55p T (GeV)R d +A u (p T )FIG.3:Ratio,R d +Au (p T ),of identified particle production rates in d −Au and p −p collisions as function of p T at pseu-dorapidity η=3.0vs.data from the BRAHMS Collaboration [2].As a demonstration of the valence quark domination in the projectile particle leading to an enhancement in production of negative hadrons by deuterons,we present in the same Fig.3also the model predictions for π−pro-duction at η=3.0.Much smaller nuclear suppression clearly confirms the isospin asymmetry of leading parti-cle production at large forward rapidities and large p T in d −Au collisions.Energy conservation applied to multiple parton rescat-terings in nuclear medium leads to x F scaling of nuclear effects [4,5].We expect approximately the same nuclear effects at different energies and pseudorapidities corre-sponding to the same values of x F .Such a situation is demonstrated in Fig.4,where we present p T dependenceof nuclear attenuation factor R d +Au (p T )for π0mesons at different c.m.energies√50.20.40.60.811.2p T (GeV)R d +A u (p T )FIG.4:Theoretical predictions for an approximateexp(η)/√6(2005).[5]B.Z.Kopeliovich,J.Nemchik,I.K.Potashnikova,I.Schmidt and M.B.Johnson,Nucl.Phys.B(Proc.Suppl.)146,171(2005).[6]L.V.Gribov,E.M.Levin and M.G.Ryskin,Nucl.Phys.B188,555(1981);Phys.Rep.100,1(1983).[7]A.H.Mueller,Eur.Phys.J.A1,19(1998).[8]L.McLerran and R.Venugopalan,Phys.Rev.D49,2233(1994);Phys.rev.D49,3352(1994).[9]D.Kharzeev,Y.V.Kovchegov and K.Tuchin,Phys.Lett.B599,23(2004).[10]The E866Collaboration,M.J.Leitch et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.84,3256(2000).[11]The NA3Collaboration,J.Badier et al.,Z.Phys.C20,101(1983).[12]PHENIX Collaboration,R.G.de Cassagnac,talk atQuark Matter,Berkeley,2004.[13]A.V.Abramovsky,V.N.Gribov and O.V.Kancheli,Yad.Fiz.18,595(1973).[14]M.Gluck, E.Reya and A.Vogt,Z.Phys.C67,433(1995).[15]D.de Florian,R.Sassot and M.Stratmann,Phys.Rev.D75,114010(2007);Phys.Rev.D76,074033(2007). [16]A.B.Zamolodchikov,B.Z.Kopeliovich and pidus,Pis’ma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz.33,612(1981);Sov.Phys.JETP Lett.33,595(1981).[17]M.B.Johnson,B.Z.Kopeliovich and A.V.Tarasov,Phys.Rev.C63,035203(2001).[18]B.Z.Kopeliovich,A.Sch¨a fer and A.V.Tarasov,Phys.Rev.C59,1609(1999).[19]B.Z.Kopeliovich,A.Sch¨a fer and A.V.Tarasov,Phys.Rev.D62,054022(2000).[20]R.P.Feynman,R.D.Field,and G.C.Fox,Phys.Rev.D18,3320(1978).[21]B.Z.Kopeliovich,B.Povh,J.Phys.G30,S999(2004).[22]B.Z.Kopeliovich,I.K.Potashnikova, B.Povh andI.Schmidt,Phys.Rev.D76,094020(2007).。