智能电网路线图与构造pdf介绍SmartGridRoadmapandArchitecture
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:1.83 MB
- 文档页数:18
智能电网的需求研发中心-郑灶贤下面内容是基于美国国家行业标准和技术协会(NIST)在2010年发布的《国家行业标准和技术协会的智能电网互操作性标准的框架和路线图》(NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards)进行翻译,同时结合国内相关资料完成编写,主要描述智能电网需求中整体架构和各个部分需求。
目标是让大家从需求的角度去了解智能电网和传统电网的不同之处,通过比较直观的图形化的方式比较全面的了解智能电网,认识部分与整体在智能电网中的位置和它们的关联关系。
从整个智能电网网划分为七个领域,包含客户、市场、服务供应商、电网运营、主网、配网和发电,其中市场和服务供应商就是我们传统供电局市场部的工作内容。
下面是智能电网的基本概念图:通过概念图,我们可以清晰的发现各个部分之间的交互关系和电能潮流的连接关系。
下面进行就各个领域进行简单的说明。
●客户:描述最终的电能客户,客户可能拥有发电、存能和用电管理。
传统的客户范围家庭客户、公共或大厦客户和工业客户。
●市场:运营商和电力市场的参与者。
●服务供应商:该机构为客户和公用事业提供电力服务。
●电网运营:电力网络运营管理。
●发电: 大容量发电的发电机。
也可为分布式储能。
●主电:长距离大容量的电力的输送。
也可是储能和发电。
●配网:分配电力给客户或从客户获取电力。
也可是储能和发电。
智能电网的根本目的是随着客户变成供应链中的主动参与者,实现功耗的降低和发电量的增加。
客户领域根据典型需求通常被分成三个子领域,分别是家庭(小于20kW)、商业/大楼(20至200kW)和工业(大于200kW)子领域。
每个子领域都有多个参与者和应用,每种应用又有一个电表以及可以放在电表、能源管理系统(EMS)或独立网关中的能源服务接口(ESI)。
ESI是主要的服务接口,它可以通过高级计量基础设施(AMI)或其它一些方式(如互联网)实现与其它领域的通信。
智能电网技术路线图2011-06-17 10:32:00 来源:国家能源局能源节约和科技装备司二、智能电网技术发展cnwpem1.技术研发和示范:①智能电网技术繁杂,一些技术已经发展比较成熟,但一些技术仍有待发展。
这就需要在继续对这些不成熟技术进行研发的同时,适当建立商业示范项目,获取一手数据(2011~2025年)。
②进行需求侧管理是智能电网主要特点,主要是对工业、服务业和居民用电需求进行管理,有助于削峰填谷。
在电网运营方面,对于需求侧管理的技术发展很成熟,还需大量投入;在发电侧,也需要提高需求侧管理技术,提高其接纳可再生能源的能力(2020年完成)。
③从现有示范项目来看,用户端基础技术研发加速了智能电网用户调解电力需求的能力,也提高了用户电力需求的稳定性。
目前相关技术正在研发过程中,有些已经开始进入示范阶段(2011~2020年)。
2.标准制定:①各国政府和相关部门应对智能电网设备、数据传输和交互性等问题进行定义,并制定相应标准,这首先应建立一个标准制定计划(2011~2013年)。
②增强智能电网标准国际合作,推动国际标准的制定(2011~2050年)。
三、政策法规的制定IEA指出,建立有助于智能电网发展的投资环境,最重要的就是平衡各方费用、利益和风险,这就需要制定相关法律法规。
具体路线图如下:1.发电、输电和配电:①制定相关规章制度,使得发电布局形成这样一种形式,即大规模发电站与小的分布式发电方式并存(2011~2030年),制定有助于可再生能源接入的相关政策机制,鼓励可再生能源发展(2011~2030年)。
②制定地区输电系统评估制度,找出与智能电网差距,指出存在问题,规划近期和中期投资(2011~2020年)。
③制定相关政策法规,使得智能电网发展能够推动分布式发电领域投资,并获取收益(2011~2020年),发展用户信息实施监控系统,推动分布式发电系统计划、设计和运作(2011~2050年)。
智能电网,就是电网的智能化,也被称为“电网 2.0”,它是建立在集成的、高速双向通信网络的基础上,通过先进的传感和测量技术、先进的设备技术、先进的控制方法以及先进的决策支持系统技术的应用,实现电网的可靠、安全、经济、高效、环境友好和使用安全的目标,其主要特征包括自愈、激励和包括用户、抵御攻击、提供满足21世纪用户需求的电能质量、容许各种不同发电形式的接入、启动电力市场以及资产的优化高效运行。
美国电力科学研究院将智能电网定义为:一个由众多自动化的输电和配电系统构成的电力系统,以协调、有效和可靠的方式实现所有的电网运作,具有自愈功能;快速响应电力市场和企业业务需求;具有智能化的通信架构,实现实时、安全和灵活的信息流,为用户提供可靠、经济的电力服务。
[编辑本段]基本简介智能电网概念的发展有3个里程碑:第一个就是2006年,美国IBM公司提出的“智能电网”解决方案。
IBM的智能电网主要是解决电网安全运行、提高可靠性,从其在中国发布的《建设智能电网创新运营管理-中国电力发展的新思路》白皮书可以看出,解决方案主要包括以下几个方面:一是通过传感器连接资产和设备提高数字化程度;二是数据的整合体系和数据的收集体系;三是进行分析的能力,即依据已经掌握的数据进行相关分析,以优化运行和管理。
该方案提供了一个大的框架,通过对电力生产、输送、零售的各个环节的优化管理,为相关企业提高运行效率及可靠性、降低成本描绘了一个蓝图。
是IBM一个市场推广策略。
第二个是奥巴马上任后提出的能源计划,除了以公布的计划,美国还将着重集中对每年要耗费1200亿美元的电路损耗和故障维修的电网系统进行升级换代,建立美国横跨四个时区的统一电网;发展智能电网产业,最大限度发挥美国国家电网的价值和效率,将逐步实现美国太阳能、风能、地热能的统一入网管理;全面推进分布式能源管理,创造世界上最高的能源使用效率。
可以看出美国政府的智能电网有三个目的,一个是由于美国电网设备比较落后,急需进行更新改造,提高电网运营的可靠性;二是通过智能电网建设将美国拉出金融危机的泥潭;三是提高能源利用效率。
《智能电网与新能源》PPT课件contents •智能电网概述•新能源技术及其应用•智能电网与新能源融合发展•政策支持与市场前景分析•挑战与机遇并存,创新驱动发展•总结回顾与展望未来目录CATALOGUE智能电网概述定义与发展历程定义发展历程智能电网特点及优势特点优势提高能源利用效率、减少能源浪费、降低运营成本、促进可再生能源的接入和消纳、提升用户用电体验等。
国内外发展现状与趋势国内发展现状01国外发展现状02发展趋势03CATALOGUE新能源技术及其应用太阳能光伏发电技术太阳能光伏电池原理及分类01光伏发电系统组成与运行02太阳能光伏发电的应用领域03风能发电技术风能资源评估与选址风力发电机组的类型与特点风能发电系统的运行与控制生物质能利用技术生物质能资源及其特点介绍生物质能的来源、分类和特点,以及生物质能利用的意义和前景。
生物质能转化技术阐述生物质能转化的主要技术,包括生物质压缩成型、气化、液化和热解等,并分析各种技术的优缺点和适用范围。
生物质能利用的应用领域列举生物质能在发电、供热、交通燃料等领域的应用实例,并探讨生物质能与其它新能源的互补性和协同作用。
地热能利用技术海洋能利用技术核聚变能利用技术030201其他新能源技术CATALOGUE智能电网与新能源融合发展分布式能源接入智能电网01020304微电网在新能源领域应用微电网定义及构成微电网在新能源领域的应用优势微电网运行控制策略案例分析储能技术在智能电网中作用储能技术在智能电网中的应用场景:削峰填谷、调频调CATALOGUE政策支持与市场前景分析国家级战略规划将智能电网和新能源列为国家级战略新兴产业,制定一系列扶持政策,推动产业发展。
财政资金支持设立专项资金,支持智能电网和新能源技术研发、产业化和应用示范。
税收优惠对智能电网和新能源企业给予所得税、增值税等方面的税收优惠政策。
国家政策对智能电网和新能源支持030201市场需求及竞争格局分析市场需求竞争格局产业链协同未来发展趋势预测技术创新随着科技不断进步,智能电网和新能源技术将不断创新,推动产业持续发展。
UNITED STATES OF AMERICABEFORE THEU.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY COMMENTS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION ON NIST FRAMEWORK AND ROADMAP FOR SMART GRID INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS, RELEASE 1.0 (DRAFT)Rick SergelPresident and Chief Executive Officer David N. CookVice President and General Counsel Michael J. AssanteVice President and Chief Security Officer North American Electric Reliability Corporation116-390 Village Boulevard Princeton, NJ 08540-5721(609) 452-8060(609) 452-9550 – facsimile*******************Rebecca J. MichaelAssistant General CounselHolly A. HawkinsAttorneyNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation1120 G Street, N.W.Suite 990Washington, D.C. 20005-3801 (202) 393-3998(202) 393-3955 – facsimile**********************************************November 9, 2009TABLE OF CONTENTSI. INTRODUCTION 1II. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS 2III. BACKGROUND 2IV.DISCUSSION 7 V. CONCLUSION 13I. INTRODUCTIONThe North American Electric Reliability Corporation (“NERC”) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Release 1.0 (“Smart Grid Framework Document”).1NERC has been certified by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”) as the “electric reliability organization” under Section 215 of the Federal Power Act2 and is similarly recognized by governmental authoritiesr in Canada. Because NERC’s mission is to ensure the reliability and security of the bulk powe system in North America by, in part, developing and enforcing mandatory Reliability Standards subject to FERC approval, NERC’s comments on the Smart Grid Framework Document focus on the development by NIST of voluntary Interoperability Standards as they may relate to NERC’s mandatory Reliability Standards, and in particular, to NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection (“CIP”) Reliability Standards.1 NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Release 1.0 (Draft), Office of the National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability, U.S. Department of Commerce, September 2009 (“Smart Grid Framework Document”).2 See North American Electric Reliability Corporation, “Order Certifying North American Electric Reliability Corporation as the Electric Reliability Organization and Ordering Compliance Filing.” 116 FERC ¶ 61,062 (July 20, 2006).II. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONSNotices and communications with respect to these comments may be addressed to the following:Rick SergelPresident and Chief Executive Officer David N. CookVice President and General Counsel North American Electric Reliability Corporation116-390 Village Boulevard Princeton, NJ 08540-5721(609) 452-8060(609) 452-9550 – facsimile*******************Rebecca J. MichaelAssistant General CounselHolly A HawkinsAttorneyNorth American Electric ReliabilityCorporation1120 G Street, N.W.Suite 990Washington, D.C. 20005-3801(202) 393-3998(202) 393-3955 – facsimile**********************************************III. BACKGROUNDThe NIST Smart Grid Framework Document outlines the first phase of a three-phase plan for NIST to accelerate the identification of interoperability standards and develop a robust framework for the long-term evolution of standards related to Smart Grid. While most of the interoperability standards identified pertained to the technical requirements for the interoperability of equipment, the report also acknowledges NERC’s Critical Infrastructure Protection (“CIP”) CIP-002 through CIP-009 Reliability Standards as the only mandatory NERC Standards “directly relevant to Smart Grid.”3 It is on this basis that NERC hereby provides these comments to respond to the Smart Grid Framework Document.3 Smart Grid Framework Document at p. 78.NIST also released a draft of a document entitled Smart Grid Cyber Security Strategy and Requirements (“Smart Grid Cyber Security Document”) on September 25, 2009 containing an overall cyber security risk management framework and strategy for the Smart Grid. That document maps NERC’s mandatory CIP Standards to similar cyber security documents from the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the International Electrotechnical Commission (“IEC”), the American National Standards Institute (“ANSI”) and others. NERC plans to provide comments to NIST on the Smart Grid Cyber Security Document by December 1, 2009.On March 19, 2009, FERC issued a document entitled Smart Grid Policy, Proposed Policy Statement and Action Plan Order (“Proposed Policy Statement”)4 on which NERC provided comments. The Commission issued a Final Policy Statement on July 16, 2009,5 which provided guidance regarding the development of a Smart Grid for the nation’s electric transmission system, focusing on the development of key standards to achieve interoperability and functionality of Smart Grid systems and devices. While the Commission will ultimately be responsible for adopting “interoperability standards and protocols necessary to ensure smart-grid functionality and interoperability in the interstate transmission of electric power and in regional and wholesale electricity markets,”6 NIST, in accordance with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (“EISA”), Section 1305(a), was directed “… to coordinate the advancement of a framework that includes protocols and model standards for information management to achieve interoperability of Smart Grid devices and systems.”7 NIST’s Smart Grid Framework Document presents the results of the first of three phases of that project.4 Smart Grid Proposed Policy Statement and Action Plan, 126 FERC ¶ 61,253 (March 19, 2009), Docket No. PL09-4-000 (“FERC Proposed Policy Statement”).5 Smart Grid Policy Statement, 128 FERC ¶ 61,060 (July 16, 2009), Docket No. PL09-4-000 (“FERC Policy Statement”).6 FERC Proposed Policy Statement at P 1 n.3, citing to the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-140, 121 Stat. 1492 (2007) (“EISA”), to be codified at 15 U.S.C. §17381(a).7 FERC Proposed Policy Statement at P 7 n.7, citing to EISA §1305(a).Based on NERC’s review of the Smart Grid Framework Document, there are three types of standards (either currently existing or to be developed) that NERC believes will be important to ensuring the successful operation, reliability and security of Smart Grid technologies. These standards are – Interoperability Standards, System Security Standards and Reliability Standards. Each is described below.Interoperability StandardsThe NIST Framework Document defines “Interoperability” as “[t]he capability of two or more networks, systems, devices, applications, or components to exchange and readily use information—securely, effectively, and with little or no inconvenience to the user. ... [t]hat is, different systems will be able to exchange meaningful, actionable information. The systems will share a common meaning of the exchanged information, and this information will elicit agreed-upon types of response. The reliability, fidelity, and security of information exchanges between and among Smart Grid systems must achieve requisite performance levels.”8“Standards” are defined in the Smart Grid Framework Document as: “Specifications that establish the fitness of a product for a particular use or that define the function and performance of a device or system. Standards are key facilitators of compatibility. They define specifications for languages, communications protocols, data formats, linkages within and across systems, interfaces between software applications and between hardware devices, and much more. Standards must be robust enough so that they can be extended to accommodate future applications and technologies.”9 For purposes of this document, NERC has referred to NIST’s discussion of standards for the Smart Grid as “Interoperability Standards.” NERC notes that the Interoperability Standards8 Smart Grid Framework Document at p. 11-12.9Id. at p. 12.proposed in the Smart Grid Framework Document appear to focus on components and applications, and in many cases do not directly address interoperability of networks and systems. That is, the Smart Grid Framework Document proposes Interoperability Standards that today are useful for component designers and manufacturers, but may not be adequate for system integrators and utilities to guide architectures and system properties. Standards developed for interoperability of networks and systems will also need to be carefully evaluated to ensure that no incompatibilities or conflicts are inadvertently created that could potentially adversely affect the reliability of the bulk power system.System Security StandardsSystem security standards (“System Security Standards”) refer to those standards thatwill apply to the technology and architecture of the system network and components that will collectively enable the functionality of Smart Grid technologies. According to FERC’s Proposed Policy Statement, System Security Standards should address the following considerations: (1) the integrity of data communicated (whether the data is correct); (2) the authentication of the communications (whether the communication is between the intended Smart Grid device and an authorized device, network, or person); (3) the prevention of unauthorized modifications to Smart Grid networks and devices and the logging of all modifications made; (4) the physical protection of Smart Grid networks and devices; and (5) the potential impact of unauthorized use of these Smart Grid networks and devices on the bulk-power system.10 Although there is no cited authority in the Smart Grid Framework Document, NERC believes it will be essential to address system security considerations to ensure that the standards for the design and integration of Smart Grid systems, networks and technologies do not conflict with or create unintended10Id. at P 30.reliability and security risks for the bulk power system. NERC will address this issue in more detail in its comments in response to NIST’s Smart Grid Cyber Security Document, which will be sent to NIST by December 1, 2009.NERC Reliability StandardsNERC Reliability Standards (“Reliability Standards”) are the international standards that ensure reliability of the bulk power system. Through the Energy Policy Act of 2005,11 Congress provided for the creation of an ERO, charged with developing and enforcing mandatory Reliability Standards in the United States, subject to Commission approval. NERC was certified by the Commission as the designated ERO on July 20, 2006.12 NERC’s role as the ERO is to develop, implement, and enforce mandatory Reliability Standards for the bulk power system, subject to Commission approval, in accordance with Section 215 of the Federal Power Act (the “Act” or the “FPA”).13 Section 215 requires that all users, owners and operators of the bulk power system in the United States be subject to the Commission-approved Reliability Standards. NERC-enforced, and Commission-approved Reliability Standards are designed to ensure the reliability of the bulk power system and typically apply to those entities that perform the planning, design, maintenance, and operation of facilities at the transmission and generation level.While NERC understands that NIST’s development of Interoperability Standards will help to implement devices and programs to enable the functionality of a Smart Grid, NERC’s role with respect to this process is to specifically address whether new Reliability Standards, or11 Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58, Title XII, Subtitle A, 119 Stat. 594, 941 (2005) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §824o (2007)).12See North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 116 FERC ¶61,062 (July 20, 2006)13See Id.; citing to, FPA §§ 824, 824o.modifications to existing mandatory Reliability Standards, will be necessary, to ensure the continued reliability of the bulk power system as new Smart Grid technologies and systems are developed and integrated with existing systems and networks.IV.DISCUSSIONThe title of the Smart Grid Framework Document suggests that this document is a roadmap for the development of Interoperability Standards to apply to the Smart Grid. However, the contents appear to be a “plan” for the development of Interoperability Standards rather than a roadmap as they do not provide a full complement of interoperability requirements now and into the future (i.e., off-ramps, expected evolution). Rather, the Smart Grid Framework Document appears to be a compendium of high priority elements, each with its own plan and milestones. Although there are references to “reliability” throughout the document, these references are generally attributed to the reliability of Smart Grid devices and systems rather than the reliability of the bulk power system or electric distribution systems.Accordingly, NERC’s comments herein focus on suggested areas for NIST’s further consideration in the development of Interoperabilty Standards for the Smart Grid. As discussed below, it will be vitally important for NIST Interoperability Standards to be developed in close coordination with NERC Reliability Standards to ensure the continued reliability of the bulk power system.1.NIST’s Proposed Interoperability Standards Must be Compatible with NERCReliability StandardsAlthough the voluntary Interoperabilty Standards proposed by NIST are designed to achieve a different purpose from the NERC mandatory Reliability Standards, it is critical to thecontinued reliability of the bulk power system that the two bodies of standards be compatible and complementary. The EISA has tasked NIST with the “responsibility to coordinate development of a framework that includes protocols and model standards for information management to achieve interoperability of smart grid devices and systems.”14 The Smart Grid Framework Document states that “[t]he Smart Grid is a very complex system of systems,” and “[t]here needs to be a shared understanding of its major building blocks and how they inter-relate (an architectural reference model) in order to analyze use cases, identify interfaces for which interoperability standards are needed, and to develop a cyber security strategy.”15 In order to achieve this, Interoperabilty Standards will be required to address “how to” achieve interoperability of the Smart Grid (e.g. what type of equipment an entity must use to interoperate with other Smart Grid entities, and how that equipment will communicate with each other).NERC Reliability Standards, on the other hand, deal with “what” should be done to ensure the reliability of the bulk power system. The definition of “Reliability Standard” as it appears in Section 39.1 of the Code of Federal Regulations is:“... a requirement to provide for reliable operation of the bulk power system, includingwithout limiting the foregoing, requirements for the operation of existing bulk powersystem facilities, including cyber security protection, and including the design of planned additions or modifications to such facilities to the extent necessary for reliable operation of the bulk power system; but shall not include any requirement to enlarge bulk powersystem facilities or to construct new transmission capacity or generation capacity.”NERC, as an ANSI-accredited standards-setting body, is responsible for developing mandatory Reliability Standards for the reliability of the bulk power system. NERC’s role as the ERO is to develop, implement, and enforce mandatory Reliability Standards for the bulk power system, subject to Commission approval, in accordance with Section 215 of the FPA.16 Section14 EISA Title XIII, Section 1305.15 Smart Grid Framework Document at p. 5.16 16 U.S.C. Section 824o.215 requires that all users, owners and operators of the bulk power system in the United States comply with Commission-approved Reliability Standards, which are designed to ensure the reliability of the bulk power system and typically apply to entities that own, operate, and use facilities at the transmission and generation level. Additionally, Section 401.2 of the NERC Rules of Procedure provides that “[w]here required by applicable legislation, regulation, rule or agreement, all bulk power system owners, operators, and users, regional entities, and NERC, are required to comply with all approved NERC reliability standards at all times.”17Although NIST’s voluntary Interoperability Standards and NERC’s mandatory Reliability Standards are designed to serve fundamentally different purposes, it is essential that they be compatible and that no inadvertent conflicts arise that make it impossible for entities to be able to comply with both. An entity should be able to comply with both NERC Reliability Standards listed on Table 2 and NIST Interoperability Standards. Because Interoperability Standards will likely apply to equipment and systems that interface with the equipment and systems of bulk power system users, owners, or operators’ equipment, and because these Interoperability Standards could become de facto mandatory standards that all Smart Grid technologies and systems will adopt, it will be important for NERC and NIST to coordinate on the development of the interoperability standards that affect the reliability and the security of the bulk power system.NERC looks forward to working collaboratively with NIST in the development of Interoperabilty Standards that are compatible with NERC Reliability Standards.17 NERC’s Rules of Procedure are available at: /page.php?cid=1|8|169.2.Cyber Security of the Smart Grid is a Top Priority; However Inclusion of the NERCCIP Standards Into the Interoperability Standards Will Not Ensure CompleteCyber Security Protection of Smart Grid Devices and May Have UnintendedConsequencesIn the Smart Grid Framework Document, NIST states that cyber security is a “critical priority,” covering all aspects of reliable Smart Grid integration and deployment and should be a top priority.18 While NERC agrees that cyber security is a top priority, NERC CIP Reliability Standards are not intended to reach beyond the reliability of the bulk power system. NERC therefore encourages NIST to use caution in applying NERC CIP Reliability Standards to the body of Interoperability Standards to ensure cyber security protection of Smart Grid devices.The applicability of NERC-developed, FERC-approved, CIP Reliability Standards is limited to users, owners, and operators of the bulk power system in accordance with Section 215 of the FPA. Smart Grid technologies and applications will generally be applied at the customer and distribution system levels, which are not typically considered to be part of the bulk power system. However, the aggregated impacts of these Smart Grid devices on the bulk power system could be substantial.While the purpose of developing Interoperability Standards is to ensure that Smart Grid systems can freely exchange information without logical barriers, the NERC CIP Reliability Standards purposefully put barriers in place to protect the various elements that comprise the critical infrastructure assets of the bulk power system, including critical cyber assets, from malicious intrusion or attack. As such, NIST must recognize that its application of the NERC CIP Reliability Standards to the body of Interoperability Standards will not adequately protect cyber security of all components of the Smart Grid, such as Smart Grid distribution devices.18 See Smart Grid Framework Document at p. 7.For example, NERC’s CIP Reliability Standards do not specifically protect telecommunications systems or communication paths, which are important components of the Smart Grid. Additionally, NERC CIP Reliability Standards do not provide requirements for actual components, such as the requirement for device-to-device authentication. While the CIP Reliability Standards are designed to shape the behavior of asset owners and operators, they are not designed to shape the behavior of equipment and system designers, manufacturers, and integrators. The NERC Reliability Standards apply to installed equipment and require security controls be applied to manage risk in the operation and maintenance of cyber assets. The protection goals of the Smart Grid, on the other hand, are broader, and address component security, integrity of communications, privacy, and other cyber security considerations.Accordingly, NERC encourages NIST to integrate adequate cyber security protection, at all levels (device, application, network and system) for the Smart Grid in the development of a body of Interoperabilty Standards. While NERC CIP Reliability Standards provide for the reliable and safe operation of the bulk power system by preventing the unauthorized cyber and physical access to critical assets and critical cyber assets, there is a need to develop additional cyber security protection for distribution facilities in the development of Smart Grid Interoperability Standards to address, for example, security aspects of interoperability at the distribution level. Therefore, new Smart Grid system designs that can help manage cyber security risks must be explored to ensure that suitable reliability and security considerations are included in NIST’s Interoperability Standards.NERC intends to work closely with NIST through the Smart Grid Interoperabilty Panel and in other forums on the development of cyber security Interoperability Standards for Smart Grid technologies and their associated network and system architectures, with an eye towardpass-through attacks (i.e. an attacker moving from a point in the system to other criticalinfrastructure systems) and aggregated impacts to the bulk power system. Additionally, NERC will provide more substantive comments in response to NIST’s Smart Grid Cyber Security Document by December 1, 2009.3. All Interoperability Standards Need to be HarmonizedIn its textbox labeled “Guidance for Identifying Standards for Implementation,” NIST presents a list of criteria for evaluating Interoperability Standards and emerging specifications.19 In this list, NIST proposes that a standard or emerging specification be evaluated on “whether it is integrated and harmonized with complementing standards across the utility enterprise through the use of an industry architecture that documents key points of interoperability andinterfaces.”20 NERC concurs that evaluating proposed Interoperability Standards against this criterion is a good practice and critical to the success of the NIST Interoperability Standards identification process. Although NIST states that this criterion “does not apply to every or specification listed in Tables 2 and 3,” NERC asserts that this specific criterion be full applicable to all of the proposed interoperability standards in those tables as it represents a fundamental attribute for system-wide interoperability and will ensure that all standards proposed to be included in the body of Interoperability Standards are compatible and complementary with each other.standard y19 Smart Grid Framework Document at p. 46.20Smart Grid Framework Document at p. 46.V. CONCLUSIONFor the reasons stated above, NERC looks forward to working with NIST in developing Interoperability Standards that work collaboratively and in conjunction with NERC Reliability Standards, recognizing that new or modified NERC Reliability Standards may also be necessary to integrate Smart Grid technologies based on their impact on bulk power system reliability. Additionally, because cyber security and reliability will be of paramount importance in the development of a smarter grid, NERC encourages NIST to develop cyber security Interoperability Standards that relate to Smart Grid technologies and systems.Respectfullysubmitted,Rick SergelPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDavid N. CookVice President and General CounselNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation 116-390 Village BoulevardPrinceton, NJ 08540-5721(609) 452-8060(609) 452-9550 – facsimile*******************/s/ Holly A. HawkinsRebecca J. MichaelAssistant General CounselHolly A. HawkinsAttorneyNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation1120 G Street, N.W.Suite 990Washington, D.C. 20005-3801 (202) 393-3998(202) 393-3955 – facsimile**********************************************。
智能网联汽车技术路线图2.0系统解读雷洪钧于武汉科技大学汽车和交通工程学院二〇二〇年十二月二十三日雷洪钧2020年11月11日,在2020世界智能网联汽车大会上,《智能网联汽车技术路线图2.0》(简称“路线图2.0”)正式发布。
为了认识和理解路线图2.0,本文围绕路线图2.0主要规划目标、路线图2.0的意义与背景、智能网联汽车商业化应用现状、智能网联汽车未来目标等方面,予以解读,分享如下:一、重要名称解释1)智能网联汽车,即ICV(全称Intelligent Connected Vehicle),是指车联网与智能车的有机联合,是搭载先进的车载传感器、控制器、执行器等装置,并融合现代通信与网络技术,实现车与人、车、路、后台等智能信息交换共享,实现安全、舒适、节能、高效行驶,并最终可替代人来操作的新一代汽车。
智能网联汽车,这个概念是由中国人提出来的。
目前其他国家提的主动驾驶汽车。
2)技术路线图(Technology Roadm ap),最早出现于美国汽车行业,在20世纪七八十年代为摩托罗拉和康宁(Corning)用于公司管理。
90年代末开始用于政府规划。
1987年,摩托罗拉的CharlesH.W illyard and CherryW.McClees发表在ResearchManagement的文章:Motorola’s technology roadmap process是该领域研究和应用的奠基之作。
技术路线图的定义目前没有统一定义。
(1)可以理解为:①技术路线图是指,应用简洁的图形、表格、文字等形式描述技术变化的步骤或技术相关环节之间的逻辑关系。
它能够帮助使用者明确,该领域的发展方向和实现目标所需的关键技术,理清产品和技术之间的关系。
它包括最终的结果和制定的过程。
技术路线图具有高度概括、高度综合和前瞻性的基本特征。
②技术路线图的横坐标是时间,纵坐标是资源、研发项目、技术、产品和市场。
①作为一种方法,它可以广泛应用于技术规划管理、行业未来预测、国家宏观管理等方面。
《智能电网概论》教学大纲本课程是电气工程系电力系统方向的本科专业选修课,是专门研究智能电网及其相关技术的一门课程,旨在增强电气类学生对智能电网的发展现状的了解,使学生掌握智能电网相关技术的基本内容,最终对智能电网技术的发展方向,以及发展过程中应该注意的问题形成自己的见解。
主要内容为智能电网的主要关键技术,具体包括:新能源发电及储能技术、在线监测技术、馈线自动化技术、微网控制及保护技术、互动式用电技术、电动汽车技术、智能调度技术、通信技术及资产全寿命周期管理技术等内容。
英文This is the elective course for the undergraduate students majored in electrical engineering. It aims to enhance the students to understand the present situation about the development of smart grid, make the students to master the basic related technics of the smart grid, and eventually form theirselves opinion about the development direction of the smart grid orthe key points which should be payed attention to. The main content of this course is about the key technologies related to the smart grid. It includes: new power generation and energy storage technologies, on-line monitoring technologies, feeder automation technologies, control and protection technologies for micro-gird, interactive electricity technologies, electric vehicle technologies, intelligent dispatch technologies, communication technologies and asset life cycle management technologies, etc.三、课程内容(一)课程教学目标本课程是电气工程系电力系统方向的本科专业选修课。
October 2010Emerging and maturing technologies will maximize the use of the transmission system, strengthen the safe and reliable operation of the grid, improve overall market efficiency and advance environmental policy objectives. This is the vision for the California ISO Smart Grid.The Smart Grid Roadmap and Architecture helps implement this vision by projecting a forward-looking strategy through 2020 from a technology perspective that includes advanced transmission efficiencies as well as the anticipated progress of measurement devices and automation. It offers a technical architecture based on business requirements driven from an understanding of federal and state policies and assumptions concerning the evolution of key technologies and standards. Substantial changes in federal or state policy or unexpected developments in technology, standards and other issues could alter this roadmap significantly. Because of this, the ISO considers the Roadmap a living document that will undergo frequent reviews and modifications.The ISO thanks the Electric Power Research Institute and EnerNex Corporation for their contributions in developing this roadmap.The Smart Grid Roadmap and Architecture may be downloaded from the ISO website at/green/greensmartgrid.html.The e-mail address for smart grid related comments and questions is smartgrid@.Table of ContentsIntroduction (4)Smart Grid Objectives (5)Building a Better Grid (5)Advanced Forecasting (6)Synchrophasors (8)Advanced Grid Applications (9)Enabling Demand Response, Storage and Distributed Energy Resources (11)Cyber Security (14)Architecture (15)Systems Interface Architecture (16)Summary (17)IntroductionThe California ISO envisions the 2020 grid of the future to be one brimming with cost-efficient, clean wind and solar energy that responds to grid operator instructions and dependably contributes to system reliability. The ISO, the power industry and manufacturers are rapidly developing the smart devices and software systems needed for grid evolution. This surge of innovation is driven by California’s energy and environmental policy goals, as highlighted in Figure 1, which include procuring 33 percent of the state’s retail energy needs from renewable sources by 2020, promoting energy efficiency, increasing levels of distributed generation and reducing greenhouse gas emission levels to 1990 levels.The 2020 grid has the potential to use storage technologies to store or discharge energy that firms up the variability of renewable resources. Storage could, if developed as hoped, supply ancillary services products as well, such as regulation, which is critical in maintaining system frequency within very narrow limits. Another feature of the smart grid is the everyday use of demand response. Smart technologies are expected to make available the information residential and commercial consumers require to curtail or shift their power use to a time when prices and supply are most favorable. The absence of these technologies developing as expected could result in further reliance on conventional generation to balance renewable variable generation, which maybe contrary to the goal of diversifying our generation fuels. California’s modern grid will leverage existing technologies, such as synchrophasors, to perform at its peakcapabilities. Up until now, synchrophasor data had been used for offline analysis, but in the smart grid rollout, it will be used for near real-time on-line monitoring and possibly control. New technologies including smartmeters and smart substations will help the local distribution system, owned and operated by utilities, to match the sophistication of the high-voltage transmission system. These specialized functions, if developed, could communicate demand levels, output from distributed generation and system conditions that aid the ISO in managing a grid that is more complex than any time in history. The result would be a thriving electricity sectorFigure 1: Key Smart Grid Driversthat is competitive and cost efficient — all to the benefit of our wholesale customers and ultimately retail consumers.The ISO is actively pursuing initiatives that will determine system impacts and needs under different levels of renewable resources, which potentially includes hybrid and all-electric vehicles. A recently published ISO report on integrating renewable resources provides operational requirements and generation fleet capability under a 20 percent renewables portfolio mix,1Given the current and anticipated challenges, it is imperative for the ISO to continue to develop the market and operations applications and devices that better monitor the real-time grid, which includes our own balancing area, our neighbors and the entire West. If successful, these new technologies and applications must have an effective, robust smart grid infrastructure to function properly.while forthcoming studies will help characterize system conditions under a 33 percent renewables energy standard.Smart Grid ObjectivesThe “smart grid” is the application of technologies to all aspects of the energy transmission and delivery system that provide better monitoring, control and efficient use of the system. The ISO’s goal is to enable and integrate all applicable smart technologies while operating the grid reliably, securely and efficiently, and facilitateeffective, open markets that engage and empower consumers while meeting state environmental and energy policies.To this end, the ISO will research, pilot, implement and integrate smart grid technologies that:• Increase grid visibility, efficiency, and reliability• Enable diverse generation including utility-scale renewable resources, demand response, storage andsmaller-scale solar PV technologies to fully participate in the wholesale market• Provide enhanced physical and cyber security.The expected benefits from smart grid technology deployments include:•Ability to recognize grid problems sooner and resolve them •Efficiently use the transmission system to defer or displace costly transmission investments •Enable consumers to react to grid conditions making them active participants in their energy use • Leverage conventional generation and emerging technologies when possible including distributedenergy resources, demand response and energy storage, to address the challenges introduced byvariable renewable resources.Building a Better GridThe research, pilots and implementation efforts to modernize the grid provide the basis for evaluating and understanding new technologies as well as verifying the economics and work force requirements for deploying them. These efforts will require working closely with ISO stakeholders. The research and pilot efforts should accomplish a number of important objectives that contribute to smart infrastructure development:• Provide real world experience with a new technology1Integration of Renewable Resources – Operational Requirements and Generation Fleet Capability at 20% RPS published August 31, 2010 and available on the ISO website at /2804/2804d036401f0.pdf .• Help characterize the technology’s benefits• Identify what is needed to integrate the technology• Provide the basis for conducting a cost assessment of the technology.If the industry is to benefit from emerging technologies and capabilities they support, the efforts must extend beyond the research and pilot stage. It will be important for stakeholders to take information from the research and pilot work to develop business models and policies that bring the technology forward to implementation. The Smart Grid Roadmap uses themes to organize and communicate the ISO technology-related efforts, which include the following:•Advanced Forecasting •Synchrophasors •Advanced Applications •Enabling Demand Response, Storage and Distributed Energy Resources • Cyber Security.Advanced ForecastingThe ISO determines the resources needed to serve demand based on load forecasts and ancillary service requirements forecast, in which intermittencies introduced by renewable generation pose significant challenges. Incentive-based demand response programs, significant distributedgeneration, the proliferation of plug-in electric vehicles and rooftop solar will also affect forecasted load. It is important for the ISO to use advanced forecasting techniques to produce the most accurate prediction of resource, load and grid conditions and status. In this way, the ISO can produce the most reliable and cost-effective scheduling and unit commitment plans.Improving forecasts for variable generation is essential. Variable generation is creating new requirements for faster ramping up and down energy. Also needed is increased procurement of regulation (energy to keep the power system in balance) and other reserves, and increased on and off, and up and down cycling of the gas generation fleet, which produces its own concerns by increasing costly maintenance needs. Improving weather data availability and accuracy, as well as renewable resources and demand response performance measures, forecasting algorithms and understanding demand response behaviors, will provide better forecasts, but they still will have some degree of worrisome error margins. This in turn should lead to more optimal unit commitment that will help account for forecast uncertainties and better use of renewable resources.Even so, weather-measuring equipment is limited in both scale and capability. Forecasting algorithms must be enhanced to include measurements from additional devices, intra-hour ramping forecasts and upgraded models for solar thermal and photovoltaic units. ISO forecasting must take into account all types of generation on the distribution system as it becomes more prevalent. Meanwhile, how consumers interact with demand response programs and emerging new technologies and incentives is uncertain, but needs to be thoroughly understood tomaintain efficient and reliable grid operations.The ISO uses system-wide load forecasting in addition to wind and solar generation forecasts for both day-ahead and hour-ahead periods. Meteorological and meter data standards and collection are available for those participating in the ISO market.Research, pilots and technology deployment are important components of the ISO advanced forecasting roadmap that lead to implementation of new forecasting models and techniques.SynchrophasorsHaving the ability to monitor gridconditions and receive automatedalerts in real time is essential forensuring reliability. System-wide andsynchronized phasor measurementunits take sub-second readings that provide an accuratepicture of grid conditions. The ISO work in this area focuseson obtaining, displaying and storing synchrophasor data. Deployment of synchrophasor technology is accelerating under recent U.S. Department of Energy initiatives. Most relevant to the ISO, the Western Electricity Coordinating Council’s Western Interconnection Synchrophasor Project (WISP) will almost triple the now deployed phasor measurement units to over 300. The project will also develop common software suites that improve situation awareness, system-wide modeling, performance analysis and wide-area monitoring and controls.Among the challenges related to using synchrophasor technology is the communications infrastructure, which lacks the bandwidth to handle the data traffic produced by the smart devices, needs enhanced security andmust maintain a high degree of reliability if the data is used for control decisions. Another major challenge is the lack of available applications that assimilate and provide meaningful, understandable visual displays of the extensive data produced by the smart devices to the operators.Phasor units measure voltage and electric current physical characteristics. This data can be used to assess and maintain system stability following a destabilizing event within and outside the ISO footprint, which includes alerting system operators to take action within seconds of a system event. This capability reduces the likelihood of an event causing widespread grid instability.Phasor data is also useful in calibrating the models of generation resources, energy storage resources and system loads for use in transmission planning programs and operations analysis, such as dynamic stability and voltage stability assessment. The technology may have a role in determining dynamic system ratings and allow for more reliable deliveries of energy, especially from remote renewable generation locations to load centers. The ISO currently uses phasor data on a real-time basis for basic monitoring and on a post-mortem basis to understand the cause and impact of system disturbances.Data from 57 phasor devices stream at a rate of 30 scans per second collecting more than three gigabytes of data per day. The ISO will begin to receive data from other phasor locations in the Western ElectricityCoordinating Council area in the next six months that will further enhance visibility to grid conditions. Critical to the synchrophasor roadmap is implementing a robust, standards-based communication infrastructure and monitoring and alert capabilities, as outlined below.Advanced Grid ApplicationsThe ISO relies on advanced grid applications to monitor grid conditions, recognize possible sources of instability and provide prices and control signals to system resources. This information isused in tandem with economic models to solve reliabilityproblems in the most cost-effective way. These applications need to evolve into more forward-looking and pro-active systems, rather than only reacting to real-time conditions in order to truly enhance grid operations. Integrating phasor data as well as other measurements made possible by smart grid technology can enhance a number of applications used today for managing the grid. Advanced applications for monitoring, dynamic (on the fly) assessments of grid conditions and automated controls are slowly emerging. Because the technology and communication infrastructure for synchrophasors is only now being implemented, developing applications to use this data is lagging. Also, inserting more inputs into modeling algorithms adds significant complexity on top of an already complicated system.Increased variable generation on the grid is expected to bring challenges in terms of decreased system inertia,2The ISO has a suite of market and power flow systems and tools that determines the best use of available resources based on economics and reliability. The tools include an energy management system, a modeling system that estimates the status of the statewide grid, system event analysis, voltage assessment, automatic economic unit commitment and dispatch for the real time and day ahead markets, a load-forecasting tool, and plant outage scheduler. Under development is a voltage stability analysis application that calculates voltages at which reduces the margins to maintain stability. Phasor data availability may lead to algorithms to measure this effect in real time and provide needed feedback that can be used to take preventive measures, such asscheduling additional conventional generation or sending signals to fly wheels or demand response applications. 2System inertia is the ability of a power system to oppose changes in frequency.different locations on the system to determine those near limits and sends alerts to grid operators. Integrating this functionality into the market systems will enable the ISO to commit units based on the voltage information. The applications roadmap includes activities to advance as much as possible, monitoring capabilities, the systems and algorithms to determine the best use of the grid, including dynamic thermal line ratings, and automated adaptive generation control that uses demand, storage and other system resources response forecasts. The roadmap also calls for investigating and implementing automated decision-making and control systems. However, unforeseen problems may prevent some technologies from coming to market, which contributes to the complexity in upgrading the grid and, at least, maintaining current levels of reliability.Enabling Demand Response, Storage and Distributed Energy ResourcesAmong the highest priorities for the ISO is to identify the viable smart grid technologies that will aid in understanding what is happening on the grid and support active participation in California’s wholesale energy market. Demand response needs are driving infrastructure needs, which includes smart devices and control systems that can collect data, present it to the power user and then relaytheir decisions back to the utilities or third party aggregators (also called curtailment service providers). The enabling technologies include but are not limited to:• Building Automation Systems — the software and hardware needed to monitor and control themechanical, heat and cooling, and lighting systems in buildings that can also interface with smart grid technologies.• Home Area Networks — similar to smart building technologies, except for the home where devicescommunicate with the smart grid to receive and present energy use and costs, as well as enable energy users to reduce or shift their use and communicate those decisions to the load-serving entities.If the technologies develop as hoped, power users will also be able to receive real-time prices or indicators of grid conditions that aids their decision-making processes. For instance, if the grid is under stress, consumers could elect to configure devices that automatically respond to these indicators to shift or curtail use even before wholesale prices rise or system events occur. This is one reason, along with price-responsiveness, why the ISO needs to better understand how consumers use demand response capabilities so that we can predict responsive behaviors that will affect forecasts and energy resource unit commitments.Among the challenges to overcome:• Enhancing current market models, which are based on operational characteristics of conventionalgeneration (natural gas, nuclear, hydro) that do not accommodate the full participation of demand-side resources• Determining minimum monitoring and telemetry requirements to enable more cost-effectiveparticipation for many small aggregated demand resources• Maturing standards such as OpenADR 3Besides conducting the research and analysis to form the market theories that aids industry understanding of how demand response should work under real conditions, the ISO will pursue pilots and demonstration projects that help prove or disprove expectations.to enable demand response.Smart grid technologies focused on consumers holds the promise of providing visibility of their real-time use, the current condition of the grid and their energy costs. With this information, consumers can make choices about how to adjust their energy usage manually by turning down or off the air conditioner, etc., orautomatically by setting thresholds managed by smart grid technologies. Direct consumer grid interaction and impact is possible, but only if a host of other challenges are overcome, including closing the gap between the wholesale market and retail prices, communication standards, data confidentiality and network security. 3 OpenADR, developed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, is a set of rules that specify how building and facilitymanagers can implement automated demand response in the energy management systems.The ISO is also stepping up its activities to understand and prove how storage technologies will play a role within the advancement of the smart grid. Among those activities are:•Better understanding how different types of storage behave (flywheels, batteries, etc.)•How they fit into grid operations•Understanding how storage technologies can efficiently and effectively provide regulation energy and operating reserves•Understanding how storage technologies can efficiently and effectively shift energy deliveries from off-peak periods to peak loads•Understanding how storage facilities can co-locate with renewable resources to assist in more efficient use of transmission capacity.Identifying and creating standards that technologies must meet becomes increasingly important and difficult as expanding ramping capabilities, ensuring the type of plants that follow demand up and down are available and other requirements for reliably managing the grid increase. Should the ability be realized to use different types of demand-side resources during high-renewable production and favorable grid conditions, and reduce during unfavorable conditions; could reduce the need — and cost — for building new generation and in some cases, new transmission lines. Currently, the ISO has market mechanisms and products (such as proxy demand resource that allows aggregators access to the wholesale market) supporting the increased participation of storage, demand response and distributed energy resources and enjoy comparable treatment as generating resources; however, no model exists that allows these resources to participate fully. Meanwhile, Western Electricity Coordinating Council rules are evolving, albeit slowly, to allow participation in spinning reserve and regulation markets. 4The ISO is actively participating in wholesale smart grid standards development efforts led by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) through the North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) and theISO/RTO Council (IRC). The ISO is also closely involved with demand response policies being considered at the California Energy Commission and smart grid proceedings at the California Public Utilities Commission.The enabling demand response, storage and distributed energy resources roadmap includes pilots to better understand technology capabilities, expectations for continued participation in national standards development efforts, and developing and piloting approaches for reflecting grid conditions that can be directly sent to smart grid devices.4 Spinning reserves is standby generation capacity that is capable of responding and producing energy within 10 minutes and able to run for at least 2 hours. Regulation is energy needed to maintain transmission system frequency.Cyber SecurityCyber security becomes a priority concern as additional technologies connect to grid systems and provide more real-time data as well as two-way communications. The need exists to assess risks and vulnerabilities all along thecommunications chain from data sources to consumers, much of which is outside ISO control. There is little doubt that situations will emerge that require new security controls and monitoring to ensure that grid monitoring, operations and control systems are not compromised.A number of national forums are addressing security concerns. One is the National Institute of Standards and Technology that recently released NISTIR 7628, Guidelines for Smart Grid Cyber Security . This is a three-part document covering smart grid from a high-level functional requirements standpoint.Among the challenges associated with cyber security is tailoring policies for power system monitoring and control applications, which are complex and industry and application specific. Implementing, maintaining, monitoring and improving information security so it is consistent with the organizational requirements and process are also issues to address.The roadmap for cyber security addresses the evaluation and implementation of secure and standard protocols where applicable. It also calls for creating centralized security management and auditing as well as a situationalawareness dashboard.ArchitectureThe ISO architecture vision is to allow each network service (software designed to do a specific job) to operate individually but share information with other services all through a base system called service oriented architecture (a collection of services that make up a network system). To address issues identified during this roadmap effort requires building on the ISO’s recent Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade implementation and its foundation to accommodate robust and flexible system architecture.As shown in Figure 2, the ISO will develop new systems while existing systems will undergo significant change in the next 10 years to support smart grid implementation efforts. Even systems not directly involved with smart grid support will likely be impacted by the changes, adding to concern about avoiding unintended consequences.Figure 2: Draft ISO architecture as impacted by smart grid changesOne key architectural component is a centrally managed network model. The Enterprise Model Management System (EMMS) the ISO plans to implement will centralize the functions of several current ISO services and significantly reduce the time between network model builds. This model and data management system will reduce the time it takes for new resources to register in the ISO markets, which is a significant improvement over the current process given the larger numbers of resources expected to seek participation under demand response and storage integration programs. The model and data management system will also enable the ISO to carry out grid, transmission and system event analysis using time-based models that reflect point-in-time grid conditions. This essential feature contributes to the security of a more complex and rapidly changing grid.To support a “price to device concept” that reflects grid conditions, the ISO will explore creating a grid condition indicator that will require a new system capability via the grid condition calculator. The indicator will act as a signal once published for public consumption through a public website and, possibly, a new Internet subscription service that could be directly consumed by end user devices.As mentioned in the advanced application section, the expected increases in wind and solar generation will significantly change the behavioral characteristics of the grid, which in many cases are still unknown. It willbecome increasingly important to analyze the dynamic and voltage stability of the grid and prepare responses to potential problems. To provide this new level of analysis, the ISO will incorporate dynamic and voltage stability analysis applications.Systems Interface ArchitectureThe interface diagram shown in Figure 3 shows the data and information communication infrastructure, of which some exists today and the rest to be implemented by 2020. The ISO will use well-defined, self-contained and secure interfaces and web services, to communicate data and orchestrate business processes, which will continue to evolve as services expand. In some cases where the amount of data is too big to relay across the system, we will continue to use a secure file transfer protocol (FTP) server. Secure FTP will also be used for exchanging the network models with other entities. Such Secure FTP activities will likely be managed with web services. The flexible service oriented architecture will allow entities to subscribe to new ISO services that send them prices, system conditions and other messages as appropriate.The ISO, along with the rest of the entities in the Western Electricity Coordinating Council region, will move toward standard national and international web services for phasor data, telemetry and other interactions.5Figure 3: California ISO system interface diagram guided by standardsThe common information model (CIM) is an international standard that provides a common vocabulary and definitions for the electric power industry. At every opportunity, the ISO seeks to use the CIM as a basis for standards development — and encourages others to do the same.5 For phasor data, the ISO currently uses a proprietary protocol and will implement the emerging standard IEC 61850. Note that IEEE C37.118 is the current standard and will likely be an interim step. The ISO currently uses DNP3 for telemetryexchange and will likely implement secure DNP3 with the end-state being the emerging IEC 61850 standard for telemetry.。