老年脑出血患者颅内血肿微创伤治疗的临床研究
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:157.77 KB
- 文档页数:3
颅内血肿微创清除术临床治疗效果探析目的研究颅内血肿微创清除术在脑内出血治疗中的效果。
方法方便选取2015年10月—2017年7月在该院进行救治的60例脑内出血患者为分析对象,采取随机数字的形式将60例患者划定为观察组与对照组均为30例,对照组保守型治疗,观察组采用微创清除术,然后对比神经功能恢复、血肿消除时间和并发症的发生率。
结果经治疗后,观察组神经功能恢复总有效率为96.7%,明显高于对照组,两组神经功能实际恢复状况对比,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.295,P <0.05);观察组血肿消退的具体时间是(5.1±0.7)d,明显少于对照组血,该两组血肿消退的具体时间对比差异有统计学意义(t=6.527,P<0.05);观察组在术后并发症发生率是23.3%;明显低于对照组(70.0%);该两组并发症发生率对比差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.016,P<0.05)。
结论对于脑内出血情况选择颅内血肿微创清除术来实施救治后,可取得理想效果,使血肿消退的时间、以及病亡率均大幅的减少,有利于其尽快恢复。
[Abstract] Objective To research the clinical treatment effect of minimally invasive surgery for intracranial hematoma. Methods 60 cases of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage treated in our hospital from October 2015 to July 2017 were convenient selected and randomly divided into two groups,with 30 cases in each,the control group used the conservative therapy,while the observation group used the minimally invasive surgery for intracranial hematoma,and the nerve function recovery,elimination time of hematoma and incidence rate of complications were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment,the total effective rate in the observation group was 96.7%,which was obviously higher than that in the control group,and the difference in the practice recovery of nerve function between the two groups was statistically significan(χ2=9.295,P<0.05);and the hematomas subsided specific time in the observation group was (5.1±0.7)d,which was obviously lower than that in the control group,and the difference was obvious,with statistical significance,(t=6.527,P<0.05),and the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group,(23.3%vs 70.0%),and the difference was obvious,with statistical significance(χ2=14.016,P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of minimally invasive surgery for intracranial hematoma for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage is ideal,which can greatly reduce the hematomas subsided time and morbidity,and it is conducive to the early recovery.[Key words] Intracranial hematoma;Minimally invasive surgery;Hypertension;Cerebral hemorrhage腦内出血属于临床上的多发性病症,患者数量多且致残率很高。
观察颅内血肿微创引流术治疗老年脑外伤硬膜外何鹏姜越 * 通讯作者梁超林晓敏海军陆战队医院广东潮州521000摘要:目的:探究颅内血肿微创引流术应用于治疗老年脑外伤硬膜外血肿的具体疗效,观察其可行性。
方法:抽取2015年8月-2018年8月间就诊我院的老年脑外伤硬膜外血肿的患者共35例,随机分为对照组和观察组两组,对照组17例,观察组18例。
对照组施用常规开颅手术,观察组施用颅内血肿微创引流术。
观察评估两组患者术后情况统计,同时对患者术后并发症发生率进行统计。
结果:观察组的术后情况明显优于对照组,而术后并发症的发生率对比对照组的发生率也较低,差异无明显特殊性特征,具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。
结论:在治疗老年脑外伤硬膜外血肿病症时,采用颅内血肿微创引流术的手术效果最优,对患者预后有较大程度的改善,也能够降低患者术后并发症的发生率,具有临床推广意义。
老年性脑外伤硬膜外血肿的形成原因与其头部颅骨损伤有着密切关系,由于老年人身体机能减弱,行动多有不便,一旦发生如摔伤、磕碰、意外事故等,有很大可能就会对颅骨部位造成损伤,从而引发颅内硬膜外血肿。
开颅手术对于老年人尤其是高龄老人风险性较高,所以探究安全有效的手术方法才是当务之急[1]。
本次研究就对颅内血肿微创引流术治疗老年脑外伤硬膜外血肿的疗效进行详细分析,现报告如下。
1 资料与方法1.a.b.一般资料从2015年8月-2018年8月间在我院治疗的老年脑外伤硬膜外血肿患者中抽取35例作为观察对象,随机分为2组,其中,对照组患者男12例,女5例,共17例,年龄51~76岁,平均年龄(62.3±3.7)岁;试验组男13例,女5例,共18例,年龄51~77岁,平均年龄(63.5±3.6)岁。
同时排除严重脑卒中、非外伤引起颅内硬膜外血肿、心肺功能和肝肾功能严重不全、精神障碍等不符合条件的病例。
两组患者皆签署诊疗知情意见书,在年龄及病因方面无特殊性特征,不具有统计学比较意义(P>0.05)。