I.J. Information Technology and Computer Science, 2018, 1, 1-15
Published Online January 2018 in MECS (https://www.doczj.com/doc/c9567439.html,/)
DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2018.01.01
Effect of Continuous Improvement on the
Reporting Quality of Project Management Information System for Project
Management Success
Atsushi Taniguchi
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0814, Japan
E-mail: atsushi.taniguchi.2006@https://www.doczj.com/doc/c9567439.html,
Masahiko Onosato
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0814, Japan
E-mail: onosato@ssi.ist.hokudai.ac.jp
Received: 03 November 2017; Accepted: 07 December 2017; Published: 08 January 2018 Abstract—Project management information systems have
their proven position as an effective tool for achieving project management success in terms of the successful realization of the project regarding time, cost and quality. Recent research results have indicated that quality of project management information system output information is positively and significantly related to project management information system application and project management factors and revealed the empirical support. However, getting the reporting quality of the project status report, monthly generated from the project management information system based on the information timely maintained by the project managers, responsible for ERP implementation up to the satisfactory level at any time, can be problematic without having a systematic approach implemented. This article is to discuss how the continuous quality improvement based on the plan-do-check-act cycle was conducted on the reporting quality of the project status report from project management information system generated by the project managers, for achieving project management success in ERP projects implemented by a solution provider for their customers in the various industries in Japan. The results of the study indicate that the continuous improvement on the reporting quality of project management information system was found to be effective in achieving quality of project management information system output information to help managers in decision making, planning, organizing and controlling the project. It was also found to be effective in positively influencing achievement of project management success in terms of respecting the time, cost and quality.
Index Terms—Project Management Information Systems, PMIS, Project Management Success, ERP, Continuous Quality Improvement, PDCA Cycle, Key Performance Indicators.
I.I NTRODUCTION
Information is one of the most important capitals in the organizations, because all physical facilities and environmental decision making are affected by information [1]. In cases when product or service realization has been organized in the projects, one of the main information systems (IS) in the organization is a project management information system (PMIS) [2]. Similar to other IS, a successful PMIS should have individual impacts in terms of satisfied users and effective use [3]. However, a successful PMIS should also have organizational impacts [4], that is, impacts on project management success in terms of respecting the time, cost and quality. Project management success is defined that it focuses upon the project process and, in particular, the successful accomplishment of cost, time, and quality objectives. It also considers the manner in which the project management process was conducted [5]. The recent study result has indicated that the quality of PMIS output information is positively and significantly related to PMIS application and project management factors as it helps managers in decision making, planning, organizing and controlling the project [1]. PMIS were also found to have direct impacts on project success, as they contribute to improving budget control and meeting project deadlines as well as fulfilling the technical specifications [3].
This article describes the case study on how an iterative process of continuous quality improvement [6], [7] based on the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle [8], [9] was applied for getting the reporting quality of the project status report from PMIS generated by the project managers up to the satisfactory level using the key performance indicators (KPIs) [10] for evaluation measurement. The study was conducted for the set of ERP implementation [11], [12] projects carried out by a
solution provider for their customers in the various industries in Japan. The set of projects was determined based on the following criteria that the solution provider is:
?To provide a project manager and project team
?To be responsible for providing particular results based on contractual agreements
?To provide advisory services that are mainly relevant to meet customers’ project goals
?To provide project work with the budget of the contract that is greater than the threshold value The results of the study indicate that the continuous improvement on the reporting quality of PMIS was found to be effective in achieving quality of PMIS output information to help managers in decision making, planning, organizing and controlling the project [1]. It was also effective in positively influencing project management success in terms of the following three project management dimensions [13]:
?Doing the project at the acceptable time
?Observing the budget (cost)
?Meeting the quality specifications of the project This article is structured as follows: Section II reviews the works that are related to PDCA cycle, continuous quality improvement, KPIs, scorecards and their adoption. Section III presents the literature review of PMIS and its current configuration implemented. PDCA cycle based process of continuous improvement on the reporting quality of PMIS for ERP implementation projects conducted by the solution provider is presented in Section IV. Results of continuous improvement on the reporting quality of PMIS are summarized in Section V. Finally, Section VI is composed by the conclusion.
II.R ELATED W ORKS
The PDCA cycle is a renowned continuous quality improvement approach and has been widely used by many successful companies as a strategic weapon for enhancing organizational performance [8]. Deming’s PDCA cycle of continuous quality improvement provides a systematic method to incrementally progress toward the goal [9]. According to this framework, quality improvement will be effective if improvements start with a good plan (P), activities necessary to achieve the plan are implemented (i.e., done, D), results are checked (C) to understand the causes of the results, and actions (A) are taken to improve the processes [14], [15]. Continuous quality improvement is an iterative process of: planning to improve a product or process, plan implementation, analyzing, and comparing results against those expected, and corrective action on the differences between actual and expected results [7].
A KPI is an index used in measuring an individual’s, organization’s or institution’s performa nce [16]. KPIs are essential for monitoring and controlling the project performance in the industries. An organization contains various types of processes and equipment that have to be controlled and maintained to achieve highest project performance and profit for the plants. KPIs are crucial in measuring the organizational performance and its progress [17]. KPIs help organizations understand how well they are performing in relation to their strategic goals and objectives. In the broadest sense, a KPI provides the most important performance information that enables organizations or their stakeholders to understand whether the organization is on track or not. KPIs serve to reduce the complex nature of organizational performance to a small number of key indicators in order to make it more digestible [18].
In order to be evaluated, KPIs are linked to target values, so that the value of the measure can be assessed as meeting expectations or not. The explored way in this work for improving this process is based on scorecard approach. KPIs accommodated in scorecards is a usual tool within the strategic management, but it is rarely used effectively in the field of software projects [19].
The iterative process of continuous quality improvement based on the PDCA cycle adopted by the solution provider is as follows:
?Plan:
o Establish the set of KPIs based on the guideline for evaluation of the reporting quality of PMIS
linked to the target values in the scorecard used
for the criteria of continuous quality
improvement.
?Do:
o Provide the training on the KPIs based on the reporting quality guideline referring an actual
project status report along with the scorecard for
the newly assigned project managers and/or
whomever required.
?Check:
o Evaluate the reporting quality of the project status report from PMIS monthly generated by
the responsible project manager against the
reporting quality guideline for all the ongoing
projects falling under the criteria.
?Act:
o Provide the corrective actions to the project managers in need of reporting quality
improvement and did not clear the passing score
of the KPIs set in the scorecard.
o Provide the results of reporting quality evaluation of PMIS to the head of project
delivery organization and the delivery managers
in charge of the portfolio categories where the
projects belong to.
The set of KPIs for evaluation of the reporting quality of PMIS is:
?Timeliness
?Scope
?Summary
?Risks/Issues
?Financials
?Milestones
?Client Expectation Management
?Use of PMIS
Table 1 shows the guideline of reporting quality KPIs based on a 16-point scale which covers the KPIs, a metric of performance measurement, in terms of use case, elements, evaluation criteria and score linked to eight areas of the project status report from PMIS. There are two terminologies, ETC and EAC used in Metric 5 (Financials) of Table 1. ETC (Estimate to Complete) is the expected cost to finish all the remaining project work. EAC (Estimate at Completion) is the expected total cost of completing all work expressed as the sum of the actual cost to date and the estimate to complete [20].
Table 2 shows the reporting quality KPI scorecard template with three sample entries, a full score of data maturity index based on a 5-point scale that is converted from the total score of quality KPIs based on a 16-point scale, a passing score threshold of 4 and a failing score of 3 requiring the corrective actions. The passing score threshold of 3.75 (or 4 after rounding) is calculated by the total KPI score of 12 / the perfect KPI score of 16 x 5. The scorecard is used to assist in monitoring the reporting quality of the project status report and identifying areas in need of improvement by providing a maturity index. Data maturity is measured across eight areas and a maturity index is calculated (1-5). Reviewer feedback is provided. Table 3 shows the client expectation management template that is described in Metric 7 of Table 1. It is an example in the mail format of how the response from the project sponsor on the performance question asked by the project manager should be fed back.
The project status report template that is described in Metric 8 of Table 1 is shown in Table 4. Project financials automatically calculated by PMIS is based on the earned value management (EVM) [20].
Table 1. Reporting Quality Guideline
Table 2. Reporting Quality KPI Scorecard Template
Table 4. Project Status Report Template
III.L ITERATURE R EVIEW OF PMIS AND ITS P RODUCTION
C ONFIGURATION
PMIS, which is part of enterprise environmental factors, provides access to information technology (IT) software tools, such as scheduling, cost, and resourcing software tools, work authorization systems, configuration management systems, information collection and distribution systems, as well as interfaces to other online automated systems such as corporate knowledge base
repositories. Automated gathering and reporting on KPIs can be part of this system [20]. PMIS provides a wide range of functions directly supporting a complex of a process involving various projects related activities: planning, monitoring, control and others [22]. In the IT industry, Gartner Research estimates that 75% of large IT projects managed with the support of a PMIS will succeed, while 75% of projects without such support will fail [23]. Using PMIS to manage projects, while not sufficient to ensure project success, has thus become a necessity [3]. The most appropriate PMIS configuration defined depends on the project situation [24]. Project situation requirements for PMIS have been identified accordingly to project classification [25] based on the project type, product, size, organization, management, planning approaches and related guidance, as well as project environments and specific requirements, enterprise environment factors and organizational process assets [20]. Definition of the PMIS configuration requirements must include the following information [24] such as data entities or work items used in the project, attributes or data fields of each data entity and processes or workflows related to the data.
The configuration use case elements supported by the PMIS implemented for the use by the solution provider are shown in Table 5. It aims to provide the KPIs, risk registers and reports such as project financials in terms of EVM. This part of the paper is based on the previous study conducted [26] in 2017.
Table 5. PMIS Production Configuration Use Case Elements
It covers four types of delivery services provided by the solution provider based on the two contract types, time and material contracts (T&M) and firm fixed price contracts (FFP) [20], related to the ERP implementation projects and operations support to their customer in four major industry sectors in Japan. It also captures 100% of the contracts closed for the four delivery services so that the performance of each project can be closely monitored for early detection of issues and risks and the project outcomes can be controlled at an early stage based on the appropriate corrective actions [20], [21] implemented ahead of time.
IV.C ONTINUOUS Q UALITY I MPROVEMENT P ROCESS TO ACHIEVE R EPORTING Q UALITY OF PMIS Continuous Quality Improvement process on the reporting quality of the project status report from PMIS consists of two major processes. One is PMIS Reporting Quality KPI Training process that is conducted at the beginning of each project when the project manager assigned is either newly hired or taking on the role for the first time. The other is an iterative process of Continuous Quality Improvement on Reporting Quality of Project Status Report that is conducted once the financial month end closing of PMIS is completed in the project lifecycle for the set of projects described in Section I. PMIS used to trigger the initiation of the PMIS reporting quality KPI training as well as the succeeding iterative continuous quality improvement process on the reporting quality of PMIS systematically throughout the project duration is discussed below.
A. Conduct Continuous Quality Improvement Process on Project Status Report from PMIS in Project Lifecycle Systematic overview of the continuous quality improvement process to achieve the reporting quality of PMIS that is triggered by the appropriate project initiation information from PMIS can be expressed in IDEF0 (Integration DEFinition level 0) [27], [28] as shown in Fig. 1. This is the top-level context diagram A-0.
It is decomposed to the next level diagram with a systematic framework that consists of two nodes, A1 and A2 as shown in Fig. 2. Node A1 is PMIS reporting quality KPI training process that is triggered by the relevant project initiation information from PMIS to be conducted at the beginning of each project. It is specifically positioned to influence the phase and project results positively, as well as coach and educate project manager on upcoming project status reporting with the methodology, tools, quality and standards based on the reporting quality guideline along with the reporting quality KPI scorecard template and the project status report template. Node A2 is an interactive process of continuous quality improvement on the project status report from PMIS to be conducted monthly throughout the project duration. It is positioned to check that reporting quality of the project status report generated upon completion of the financial month end closing of PMIS is aligned with the reporting quality guideline and up to the satisfactory level at the reporting quality KPI scorecard. It is to make sure that the quality of PMIS output information can help managers in decision making, planning, organizing and controlling the project.
Fig.1. Conduct Continuous Quality Improvement Process on the Project Status Report from PMIS in the Project Lifecycle
Fig.2. Conduct PMIS Reporting Quality KPI Training and Continuous Quality Improvement on the Project Status Report from PMIS
B. Classify Project Having Newly Assigned Project Manager and Conduct Reporting Quality KPI Training The decomposition of node A1 to 3 activities is shown in Fig. 3. PMIS strategically implemented is effectively used by the independent quality reviewer who does not belong to the organization unit responsible for the project delivery, in searching for the newly registered projects classified for the need of continuous quality improvement on the reporting quality of PMIS, having newly hired project managers assigned. This process for conducting the reporting quality KPI training by the internal quality reviewer plays the most important role to properly kick off the continuous quality improvement process on the reporting quality of PMIS that is to be carried out monthly in the project lifecycle.
Fig.3. Classify the Project Having the Newly Assigned Project Manager and Conduct the Reporting Quality KPI Training
Below are the major activities required to plan and conduct Reporting Quality KPI Training.
? Node A11; Classify Project Having New Project
Manager Assigned: The independent quality reviewer is to check (during the 1st two weeks of the month) if there is any newly started project in PMIS which is having a newly hired project manager assigned and relevant for triggering the initiation of the continuous quality improvement process on the reporting quality of PMIS based on the following criteria that the Solution Provider is:
o To provide a project manager and project team o To be responsible for providing particular results
based on contractual agreements
o To provide advisory services that are mainly
relevant to meet customers ’ project goals
o To provide project work with the budget of the
contract that is greater than the threshold value
Table 6 shows a snapshot of the project initiation information from PMIS taken in January 2017 for classifying the project having a newly hired project manager assigned. Project J1 is identified as the classified project having the newly hired project manager, Project Manager 4 assigned.
? Node A12; Ask Project Manager to Attend
Reporting Quality KPI Training: Once a relevant project is found:
o The independent quality reviewer is to send an email to the project manager responsible for the execution of the project, which is also copied to the delivery manager in charge of the portfolio category, based on the explanation for the need of getting Reporting Quality KPI Training conducted before a proposed due date for completion stated on the email.
o The project manager is to send back an hour
meeting request with a date specified for having the Reporting Quality KPI Training conducted. o The independent quality reviewer is to respond
to the meeting invite to have the training date finally fixed.
? Node A13; Conduct Reporting Quality KPI
Training: The independent quality reviewer is:
o To educate the project manager responsible for
the project on the PDCA cycle of continuous quality improvement process, based on the quality audit monthly conducted on the project status report generated from PMIS against the reporting quality guideline, to keep the quality of the PMIS output information above the passing score threshold defined in the reporting quality KPI scorecard as evaluation criteria.
o To request the project manager to create the
preliminary project status report based on the project status report template as an exercise so that it can be used as a basis for quality evaluation and corrective actions for quality improvement if necessary.
o To maintain a record for the training attendance
and provide the project manager with the PMIS reporting quality tutorial, the reporting quality guideline as well as the reporting quality KPI scorecard template upon completion of the training session.
Table 6. Project Initiation Information from PMIS Classifying the Project Having the Newly Hired Project Manager Assigned
C. Conduct Iterative Process of Continuous Quality
Improvement on Project Status Report
The decomposition of node A2 to 6 activities is shown in Fig. 4. In an iterative process based on the PDCA cycle, a periodic quality audit by the independent quality reviewer is conducted on the relevant project status reports generated based on the information maintained by the responsible project managers upon completion of the financial month end closing of PMIS. Analysis of the audit results compiled is reported to the managers of the project delivery organization for their governance. Corrective actions for quality improvement required accordingly to the reporting quality guideline are communicated to the project managers who have not cleared the passing score threshold in the reporting quality KPI scorecard.
Fig.4. Conduct the Iterative Process of Continuous Quality Improvement on the Project Status Report from PMIS
Table 7. Online Portfolio Report for the Project with the Reporting Quality Audit Requirement
Below are the steps of major activities required for conducting Continuous Quality Improvement.
?Node A21; Identify Project Due for Reporting Quality Audit: By leveraging the Online Portfolio
Report that is available in PMIS, the independent
quality reviewer is to check the set of relevant
projects (based on the criteria set by the Solution
Provider) for triggering the iterative process of
continuous quality improvement on the reporting
quality of PMIS on the 25th of every month. Table
7 shows the set of selected projects classified for
continuous quality improvement on the project
status report from PMIS due for the monthly
reporting quality audit.
?Node A22; Request Relevant Project Managers to Update Project Status:For covering each project
relevant for continuous quality improvement on
the project status report due for the reporting
quality audit, the independent quality reviewer is:
o To send an email request to the project manager responsible for execution of the project, which is
also copied to the delivery manager in charge of
the portfolio category, for getting the project
status report updated by the due date specified
upon completion of the financial month end
closing of PMIS.
o To request the project manager to ask any questions on how to enter the contents of project
status report and the prereview on the update if
required.
?Node A23; Execute Prereview on Updates If Requested by Project Manager:The following
major activities are conducted:
o The project manager is to send the updated project status report for review by email to the
independent quality reviewer at the earliest
timing possible prior to the deadline specified.
o The independent quality reviewer is to provide the project manager with the review results on
the updated project status report submitted for
prereview by return.
?Node A24; Execute Reporting Quality Audit for Relevant Project:The following major activities
are conducted:
o The independent quality reviewer is to audit the
reporting quality on the latest project status
report from PMIS, updated right after the
previous month end closing, against the
reporting quality guideline along with the
reporting quality KPI scorecard template based
on the following criteria:
?Good Standing: Indicates that the reporting quality audit is passed with the passing score
of 4 or above earned in the data maturity
index of the quality reporting KPI scorecard.
No further action is required except for what
is stated as comments for improvement.
?Improvement Required: Indicates that the reporting quality audit has not cleared the
passing score threshold of 4 in the data
maturity index of the quality reporting KPI
scorecard. The further corrective actions for
reporting quality improvement entered in the
reporting quality KPI scorecard are to be
applied and completed by the next reporting
cycle.
?Node A25; Issue Corrective Actions for Not Having Quality KPIs Cleared:The independent
quality reviewer is to communicate by email to the
project manager and the delivery manager in
charge:
o The results of the evaluation on each review item of the project status report against the respective
target metric of reporting quality guideline along
with the corrective actions (if required), which
are entered in the reporting quality KPI
scorecard.
Table 8 shows the list of projects not having the quality KPIs cleared with the corrective actions issued in the reporting quality KPI scorecard.
?Node A26; Report Audit Results to Stakeholders: The independent quality reviewer is to report by
email the final quality audit results to the head of
project delivery organization and the delivery
managers for their governance on the corrective
actions issued for quality improvement. Table 9
shows the quality audit results of the project status
report generated from PMIS on all the project
manager assigned consulting projects classified for
the iterative process of continuous quality
improvement upon completion of the financial
month end closing of January 2017.
V.R ESULTS
The quality audit results in the project lifecycle of Project J1 and Project T, the two projects identified in Table 6 are shown in Table 10 and Table 11 respectively. Project J1 was conducted by the newly hired project manager and Project T was conducted by the experienced senior project manager who is used to the reporting quality requirements of PMIS. At any rate, both the projects have achieved the passing score for the data maturity index of the reporting quality KPI scorecards in the iterative process of continuous quality improvement. They were also completed successfully in terms of project management, respecting the time, cost and quality. Likewise, there were six other projects, Project S, Project Y, Project M, Project O, Project A, and Project T1 described in Table 7, having been carried out since 2016 based on the application of PDCA cycle on continuous quality improvement of the PMIS output information that were completed successfully till the end of September 2017 for the period of this study, achieving the reporting quality KPIs of PMIS at the satisfactory level as shown in Table 12, Table 13, Table 14, Table 15, Table 16, and Table 17 respectively, and respecting the time, cost and quality in terms of project management. Lastly, there was one project, Project T4 described in Table 7 based on the final quality audit results in January 2017, shown in Table 9 with the passing score of 4 was also completed achieving project management success in terms of respecting the time, cost and quality.
VI.C ONCLUSION
As discussed in Section V, the results of the case study indicate that the continuous improvement on the reporting quality of PMIS was found to be effective in:
?Achieving quality of PMIS output information to help managers in decision making, planning,
organizing and controlling the project [1], as they
rely on PMIS 100% for the project financials in
terms of project management for predicting and
controlling the outcome of the project based on the
early detection of issues and risks.
?Influencing project management success in terms of the three project management dimensions [13]
positively as follows:
o Doing the project at the acceptable time
o Observing the budget (cost)
o Meeting the quality specifications of the project Since January 2017, a total of nine projects listed in Table 7 has been completed achieving project management success in terms of respecting the time, cost and quality.
PMIS that captures 100% of the closed contracts used for reporting the monthly project financials can surely influence the project managers on getting the passing score on the reporting quality KPIs for achieving project management success.
R EFERENCES
[1]S. Fallah, Y. Gholipour-Kanani, “The Effect of Project
Management Information System on Project Managers and Project Success,” Journal for Studies in Management and Planning, April 2016, Volume 02, Issue 4.
[2]S. Berzisa, “Application of Project Management
Information Systems in Efficiency Improvement of Quality Management System,” in Proceedings of the 10th
International Scientific and Practical Conference on Environment. Technology. Resources, (2015), Volume III, 17-21. DOI: https://www.doczj.com/doc/c9567439.html,/10.17770/etr2015vol3.173 [3]L. Raymond, F. Bergeron, “Project Management
Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Their Impact on Project Managers and Project Success,” International Journal of Project Management, 26 (2008), 213-220. [4]W. H. DeLone, E. R. McLean, “The DeLone a nd McLean
Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring 2003, Vol. 19, No. 4, 9-30.
[5] D. Baccarini, “The Logical Framework Method for
Defining Project Success,” Project Management Journal, December 1999, Vol. 30, No. 4, 25-32.
[6]S. A. El_Rahman, B. A. Al-Twaim, “Development of
Quality Assurance System for Academic Programs and Courses Reports,” International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science,2015, 6, 30-36. DOI:
10.5815/ijmecs.201506.05.
[7] J. A. Lorch, V. E. Pollak, “Continuous Improvement in
Daily Clinical Practice: A Proof of Co ncept Study,” PLOS ONE, May 2014, Volume 9, Issue 5, e97066. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097066.
[8] E. Gidey, K. Jilcha, B. Beshah, D. Kitaw, “The Plan -Do-Check-Act Cycle of Value Addition,” Industrial Engineering & Management, 2014, Volume 3, Issue 1, 1000124. DOI: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000124.
[9] J. E. Knight, S. Allen, “Applying the PDCA Cycle to the
Complex Task of Teaching and Assessing Public Relations Writing,” International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, 2012, Vol. 1, No. 2. DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p67.
[10] M. Y. Ong, B. Muniandy, S. L. Ong, K. N. Tang, K. K.
Phua, “Comparing the Acceptance of Key Performance Indicators Management Systems on Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use in a Higher Education Institution in Malaysia,” International Journal of Education and Computer Science, 2012, 10, 9-16. DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.10.02.
[11] M. R. J. Qureshi, A. M. Abdulkha laq, “Increasing ERP
Implementation Success Ratio by Focusing on Data Quality & User Participation,” International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business , 2015, 3, 20-25. DOI: 10.5815/ijieeb.2015.03.03.
[12] H. R. Kerzner, Ph.D., Project Management - Best
Practices: Achieving Global Excellence, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 207-211, 2014.
[13] A. A. Shojaie, M. Shadalooie, K. Khalili-Damghani, M. R.
Pakzad, “Development of a Conceptual Model of Project Management Information Systems for Investigating its Effective Factors Impacting the Success of Project Using Structural Equation Model,” International Journal of Life Science & Pharma Research, Special Issue, SP 2016, Issue 1, 17-29.
[14] M. Matsuo, J. Nakahara, “The effects of the PDCA cycle
and OJT on workplace learning,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, January 2013, Vol.24, No. 1, 195-207. DOI: abs/10.1080/09585192.2012.674961.
[15] J. J. Dahlgaard, K. Kristensen, G. K. Kanji, “Total Quality
Management and Education ,” 1995, Taylor & Francis, 445-456. DOI: 10.1080/09544129550035116.
[16] M. Y. Ong, B. Muniandy, S. L. Ong, K. N. Tang, K. K.
Phua, “User Acceptance of Key Performance Indicators Management Systems in a Higher Education Institution in Malaysia: A Pilot Study,” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2013, 5(1), 22-31.
[17] S. U. Amin, J. Aftab, H. Sarwar, H. Sarwar, “Influence of
Project Management Performance Indicators on Project Success in Construction Industry of Punjab, Pakistan,” International Research Journal of Management Science, 2016, Vol. 4 (8), 511-520.
[18] B. Marr, “How to Design Key Performance Indicators,
Management Case Study,” The Advanced Performance Institute, BWMC Ltd., 2010.
[19] V. R. Montequin, F. O. Fernandez, C. A. Perez, J. V.
Balsera, “Scorecard and KPIs for Monitoring Software Fact ories Effectiveness in the Financial Sector,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management , 2013, Vol. 1, No. 3, 29-43. DOI: 10.12821/ijispm010302
[20] Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project
Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK? Guide)-Sixth Edition. PMI, 2017-09-22.
[21] ISO, ISO 9001:2015 – Quality management systems –
Requirements. Fifth edition, 2015-09-15.
[22] S. Berzisa, “The Baseline Configuration of Project
Management Information System,” Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University, Computer Science, 2009, Vol. 5, No. 40, 59-65.
[23] M. Light, B. Rosser, S. Hayward, Realizing the benefits of
projects and portfolio management, Gartner, Research ID: G0*******, January 4, 2005, 1-31.
[24] S. Berzisa, “Application of Knowledge and Best Pr actices
in Configuration of Project Management Information Systems,” Ph.D. Thesis , Riga Technical University, Latvia, 2012.
[25] S. Berzisa , “Project Man agement Knowledge Retrieval:
Project Classification,” in Environment. Technology. Resources: Proceedings of 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference, June 20-22, 2011, Volume II, Vol. I, 33-39.
[26] A. Taniguchi, M. Onosato, “Use of Project Management
Information System to Initiate the Quality Gate Process for ERP Implementation,” International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 2017, Vol. 9, No. 12, 1-10. DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2017.12.01
[27] B. El-Sharef, K. S. El-Kilany, “Process Modeling and
Analysis of a Quality Management System for Higher Education,” in Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2011, Vol. I , WCE 2011, July 6-8, 2011, London, U. K.
[28] L. Tsir onis, A. Gentsos, V. Moustakis, “Empowerment
the IDEF0 Modeling Language,” International Journal of Business and Management, May 2008, Vol. 3, No. 5, 109-118.
Authors ’ Profiles
Atsushi Taniguchi is a certified PMP and holds a Master of Science degree in information and computer science from Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.
He has over 25 years of extensive experience in designing, developing and managing software development and implementation projects including ERP
implementation projects for 15 years. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in information science at the Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Mr. Taniguchi is a member of PMI, PMI Japan Chapter, the Society of Project Management, and Information Processing Society of Japan.
Masahiko Onosato received his Ph.D. in engineering from the University of Tokyo, Japan in 1993.
He is a Professor in the Graduate School of Information Science and Technology at Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. His main research fields are virtual manufacturing systems, computer-aided systems, and disaster
information systems.
Professor Onosato is a member of IEEE, ACM, JSME, JSPE, and SICE.
How to cite this paper: Atsushi Taniguchi, Masahiko Onosato, "Effect of Continuous Improvement on the Reporting Quality of Project Management Information System for Project Management Success", International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science(IJITCS), Vol.10, No.1, pp.1-15, 2018. DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2018.01.01
医疗质量管理 与持续改进记录表 科室: XX科 年度: 2017年 医疗质量持续改进记录表填写要求 1、科室成立以科主任为组长的医疗质量管理小组,并设有专职质控员。 2、本医疗质量持续改进记录表由科主任负责,质控员负责填写。 3、每年度科室要制订医疗质量持续改进计划及医疗质量控制指标。 4、科室根据医院的医疗质量控制重点内容制订每月医疗质量控制重点内容。 5、日常科室医疗质量持续改进记录表要求每月至少检查一次,并做好记录,根据存在问题制订整改措施,并对整改措施进行效果评价,由科主任审阅后签字负责。 6、每月底对科室质量控制情况进行认真总结,填写每月医疗质量控制总结,科主任签字后交医务科审查。 7、每年底对本年度科室医疗质量控制情况进行总结。 科室医疗质量管理小组成员及职责分工 科室医疗质量管理小组成员:
组长:陈文添主任 成员;陈文威副主任 质控员: 陈文威副主任(兼) 科室医疗质量管理小组职责: 科室医疗质量管理小组负责科室医疗质量管理,制定科室医疗质量管理措施与考核办法,督促医务人员执行各项规章制度与诊疗规范,对科室的医疗质量进行检查与考核。科室主任就是科室质量管理的第一责任人。 具体职责分工: 陈文添主任:对科室的医疗质量负总责,兼病历质控。 陈文威副主任:负责对科室的医疗质量进行检查与考核。 2017年度科室质量控制计划 一、需要改进的内容 (一)医疗制度、医疗技术 1、重点抓好医疗核心制度的落实:首诊负责制度、三级医师查房制度、疑难危重病例讨论制度、会诊制度、危重患者抢救制度、分级护理制度、死亡病例讨论制度、交接班制度、病历书写规范、查对制度、抗菌药物分级管理制度、知情同意谈话制度等。 2.加强医疗质量关键环节的管理。 3.加强全员质量与安全教育,牢固树立质量与安全意识,提高全员质量管理与改进的意识与参与能力,严格执行医疗技术操作规范与常规。 4.加强全员培训,医务人员“基础理论、基本知识、基本技能”必须人人达标。 (二)病历书写
护理质量管理与持续改进 记录表 科室：科 年度：2013年 护理质量持续改进记录表填写要求 1、科室成立以科主任、护士长为组长的医疗护理质量管理小组，
并设有质控员，质控员职责明确。 2、护士长负责制订护理质量控制目标、实施方案及护理质量持续改进计划，各质控员按职责定期进行检查并作好记录。 3、护士长根据护理部护理质量控制重点容制订本科室每月护理质量控制重点容。 4、日常科室护理质量持续改进记录要求每月每项至少检查一次，并做好记录，根据存在问题制订整改措施，并对整改措施进行效果评价，由护士长审阅后签字。 5、每月底在科室周会上对科室护理质量控制情况进行认真总结，填写每月护理质量控制总结，护士长签字后交护理部审查。 6、每年底对本年度科室护理质量控制情况进行总结。 科室护理质量管理小组成员及职责 护理质量管理小组 组长：阳
成员：静、欧敏、侯茂华、林巧、成凤、维、江利霞、周超琴、黄耀皿、 具体职责：负责科室日常护理质量与安全管理。包括科室核心制度落实、常见疾病的护理、危重病人的管理、护理文书书写质量、三基培训（包括新进人员培训）、病区管理、药品质量的管理、院感、抢救仪器、抢救车的管理，不良事件等。每月底对科室质量控制情况进行认真总结、通报、讨论、分析，查找原因，并针对问题进行培训，不断持续改进。 护士长签字： 年月日 2013年度科护理质量目标 1、床护比≥1:0.4 2、护理不良事件发生次数（压疮、各种护理缺陷、跌伤、走失、坠床、静脉炎等）≤20人次；护理严重差错、事故为0。
3、责任护士对所管病人各种信息知晓率、护理措施执行率≥95%、健康教育90%。 护士长签字： 年月日 年度科室护理质量控制计划按二甲办、护理部要求，以科室主任为组长、护士长为副组长下继续成立护理质量控制管理小组，使护理工作不断得到持续改进，提高护理质量。 组长：阳（主管护师）。 副组长：侯茂华（护师）、静（护师）、欧敏（护师） 小组成员： 侯茂华（护师）、欧敏（护师）、周超琴（护师）、勋明（护师）、
白沙黎族自治县人民医院医疗质量与安全管理持续改进记录本 科室外科_ 年度_2012-2013年
白沙黎族自治县人民医院 外科医疗质量持续改进记录表填写要求 1、成立以科主任为第一负责人的医疗质量管理委员会，并设有专职质控员。 2、本医疗质量持续改进记录表由科主任负责，质控员负责填写。 3、每年度科室要制订医疗质量持续改进计划及医疗质量控制指标。 4、根据科室的医疗质量控制重点内容制订每月医疗质量控制重点内容。 5、科室日常医疗质量持续改进记录表要求每月至少检查一次，并做好记录，根据存在问题制订整改措施，并对整改措施进行效果评价，由科主任审阅后签字负责。 6、每月底对医疗质量控制情况进行认真总结，填写每月医疗质量控制总结。 7、每年底对本年度科室医疗质量控制情况进行总结。
白沙黎族自治县人民医院 2012年度外科医疗质量控制计划 本年度为了进一步保证我科医疗质量，提高医疗水平，加强医务人员职业素质，规范医疗行为，确保医疗安全和医患双方的共同利益，我科将继续遵循“以病人为中心”的质量理念，以提高医疗质量为总体目标，以提高病人满意率为宗旨，进一步建立任务明确、职责与权限相互制约、协调、促进的质量保证体系，使科室的医疗质量工作规范化进行。通过质量管理的持续改进，提高我科的医疗质量及工作效率。在上一年度的基础上制定以下计划与措施：继续加强科室医疗质量控制小组的协作分工。各成员按具体原定方案开展工作如下： 一、科室医疗质量控制小组 在科主任为科室医疗质量的第一责任者、质控小组组长的领导下，组织科室质控小组护士长、质控员等有关人员，继续履行如下职责： 1、主要负责制定本年度科室医疗质量管理与持续改进方法及计划，包括科室的医疗质量自查个体化方案，保证工作实效。 2、结合本科室专业特点及发展趋势，制定及修订本科室疾病诊疗常规、药物使用规范并组织实施，责任落实到个人。 3、定期组织各级人员学习医疗、护理常规，强化质量意识。 4、完成每月科室医疗质量自查，自查内容包括诊疗操作和规章制度(尤其是医疗核心制度)执行情况两大方面；负责规范科室医务人员的医疗行为。 5、参加医疗质控办公室的会议，反映问题。收集与本科室有关的问题，提出整改措施。 二、科室质控员 其职责为每月负责协助科主任对科室的医疗工作进行督查，组织召开全科的医疗质控专项会议，每月定期作科室质控持续改进报告，以及整改措施一起
护理质量管理和持续改进 记录本 科室：___________ 年度：___________ 护理质量管理和持续改进记录本填写要求 1、科室成立以护士长为组长的护理质量控制小组。 2、本质量控制记录本由各科室护士长负责填写。 3、每年度科室要制订年度护理质量控制计划、实施方案及护理质量控制指标。 5、科室根据医院的护理质量控制重点内容制订各科室每月护理质量控制重点内容。 6、日常科室质量控制记录本要求每月至少检查4次，并做好记录，根据存在的问题制订相关整改措施，并对整改措施进行效果评价，由护士长阅后签字负责。 7、每月底对科室质量控制情况进行认真总结，填写每月护理质量控制总结，护士长签字后交护理部审查。 8、每年底对本年度科室护理质量控制情况进行总结。
护理质量控制和持续改进制度 （一）护理部将日常督察和月检查相结合，坚持每周1—2次深入病房督查各病区的护理工作落实情况，特别是危重病人的护理工作落实情况，对发现的各类隐患及时纠正，现场处理，并有针对性的提出有效、可行的防范措施。每周进行单项重点质量抽查，每月组织一次全面质量检查，对存在的问题进行登记，提出整改措施，限时整改，并随时下科室督察落实整改情况。 （二）各科室质控员根据护理质量标准，每日对分管的护理项目进行自查、发现问题及时纠正，并和护士长联系，分析原因，提出改进意见。 （三）各科护士长根据《护士长手册》上的工作要求，每日有重点的检查，有目的地跟班检查，把好基础护理、分级护理质量关、医嘱关、查对关、交接关、特殊检查诊疗关、护理记录关、健康教育实施关，对发现的问题进行登记，及时反馈当事人立即整改。 （四）护理部每月在护士长会上汇报、讲评当月质控结果，指出在检查中发现的问题，以供代鉴，对共性问题制定可行的改进措施。 （五）护理部每月初将日常督查以及月检查结果进行分析汇总、量化考核报送医院相关科室进行奖惩。
2017年护理质量汇总分析持续改进报告2017年重症医学科护理工作始终坚持一切以患者为中心，进行全面护理质量管控，依据年初修订的护理质量标准，按照护理部质量目标考核实施细则，每月不定期进行督查，利用PDCA循环达到持续改进临床护理质量，不断提升护理内涵和服务水平。具体分析报告如下： 一、2017年度护理质量汇总情况 表1：2017年各项护理质量指标评价汇总达标情况 二、2017年度护理质量达标情况分析
图表1：2016-2017年各项护理指标同比监测情况： 从图表1可以看出，2017年与2016年相比，质量上升的有基础护理，消毒隔离，护理文书书写，ICU患者十大安全质量目标；与2016年相比下降的有病区管理、危重症护理质量、责任制整体护理，优质护理服务，健康教育质量；其中下降最大的是病区管理；急救药械管理使用安全核查表，与2016年无可比性，且未达标。2016年4月开始实行输血安全核查表，因此2017年与之前的分值无可比性。 图表2：2016-2017年病区管理工作落实情况
图表3：2016-2017年基础护理落实情况 图表4：2016-2017年危重症护理落实情况 图表5：2016-2017年责任制整体护理落实情况
图表6：2016-2017年ICU患者十大安全质量目标落实情况 图表7: 2016-2017年优质护理服务落实情况
图表8：2016-2017年消毒隔离合格率 图表9：2016-2017年护理文书质量
图表10：2017年健康教育落实情况 图表11：2017年急救物品、药品合格率 图表12: 2017年输血安全核查
质量整改报告 鉴于公司质量问题频发，并呈现出多环节、多层次、多样化的实际情况，为了提高员工质量意识，保证产品金牌品质，为公司的品牌运行提供有力的基础保障，使公司的质量管理体系真正健康有序、规范高效的运行，特作出以下工作整改: 一、造势宣传、思想提升阶段（约用时15天左右）。具体工作有： （1）全体员工质量教育。 规划部门：公司高层管理。执行部门：质检部、研发部、各车间班组。参与人员：全体一线员工。 形式：培训教育。 内容：由质检部负责分类分项介绍公司产品及其零部件的检验项目、检验方式和检验标准，以及质量问题集中点。研发部负责介绍产品的性能、结构、工艺要求，作业指导，检验规范等。车间主任和班组长负责介绍生产工序特点、工序衔接、工序分配和员工之间配合要求。 作用和目的：让员工全面了解公司产品的相关信息，为下一步公司自检互检制度的执行打好基础。 （2）供应商和外来货厂家的质量宣传。 可与月日一起或分别召开供应商和供货厂家质量大会，会议要求所有供应商参与并签订相关质量保证协议，并听取供应商对质量方面的建议和意见。目的是让供应商们了解公司的质量管理形式，积极配合公司的质量控制活动，提高供应商的质量意识，解决实际问题，为以后的合作双赢局面扫清道路。详见《供应商管理制度》《供应商质量协议书》。 （3）公司所有职能部门召开质量会议，明确各职能部门在质量管理活动中的职责权限，以及工作重点和下一步工作方案。 二、稳扎稳打、贯彻执行阶段（约用时1个月）具体工作有： （1）规范公司各种流程、程序和制度。主要有：生产流程、物料运转流程、
质量控制流程、新产品开发流程（包括试样）、质量事故申报处理流程、《标识与可追溯性控制程序》《产品检验与实验控制程序》《不合格品控制程序》《纠正与预防措施控制程序》《采购控制程序》《生产过程控制程序》、生产车间管理制度，仓库管理制度，物料管理制度（包括采购、出入库等），薪酬管理制度，绩效考核管理制度等。 （2）各部门需要添加执行的制度及相关表格记录。详见文件1---5 （3）将质量指标分解，纳入管理人员考核。具体考核办法详见《绩效考核之质量指标》。 三、检查总结，持续改进阶段（约用时2—4个月） 质量问题涉及到公司内部管理的方方面面，从质量事故的发生、分析、整改到监督反馈，反映出公司各个环节的管理漏洞和不足，是一个系统性的问题，每起事故的发生都有其必然性和偶然性，要透过现象看到本质，从根本上解决问题的根源，再建立起有效的管控机制，才能避免问题的再次发生。 通过实施以上两个环节的各质量整改，会解决一些质量问题和管理上的弊端，可能会出现一些新的负面的质量因素，只能不断优化和改进工作的方式方法才能不断实现公司的质量目标。 四、制度化，规范化，标准化阶段 通过几个月的整改和完善，基本可以形成符合目前实际情况的质量管理体系，各部门和各个岗位也能认识到自己在质量管理中所扮演的角色，可先由人力资源部编写各部门部门职责、各岗位职位说明书，进一步优化薪酬管理制度，提高员工的工作积极性，是公司进入良性循环的发展模式，通过绩效考核对职能部门和岗位进行工作优化，达到人事相宜。其次，生产系统应导入IE管理(工业工程管理),设计合理的价值流图和工位分析，使生产效率进一步提高，员工的工作进一步标准化，从而减少员工的劳动强度和出错的几率。最后，要重视员工专业技能的培养，使员工操作熟练，准确，达到标准化作业。为以后的标准产能和定额管理做好准备。
2016年医务科医疗质量管理与持续改进记录考核内容
每月医疗质量和安全工作计划和重点一月份：患者病情评估及告知制度 二月份：病历书写 三月份：三级医师负责制度 四月份：抗菌药物临床应用指导原则 五月份：危重病人抢救流程 六月份：手术诊疗管理 七月份：病种质量监控管理 八月份：病种质量监控管理 九月份：麻醉工作程序 十月份：运行病历的监控与管理 十一月份：三级医师负责制度 十二月份：抗菌药物分级管理实施细则
科室医疗质量与安全管理小组工作记录 一、科室自查情况总结 二、专项质控评价 （一）科室病历书写质量评价 （二）合理用药评价 （三）科室合理用血评价（采血、取血、输血流程执行情况；输血适应症、合理用血评价；输血病历质量检查） （四）核心制度执行情况 （五）住院超过30天患者管理与评价 （六）医疗不良事件及纠纷 （七）非计划二次手术分析 （八）科室诊疗组诊疗质量分析 （九）科室医疗技术管理（二、三类医疗技术、科室新技术等技术评价和人员技能评价、审核等） （十）手术科室手术质量评价 （十一）“三基”培训和掌握情况 （十二）科室质量与安全指标变化趋势分析 三、主管部门检查反馈整改措施及效果评价 四、科室质量安全控制重点议题（包括根据医院工作重点制定下一阶段科室质控计划等）。
检查日期2016、1、3 检查人员李长友、王曙梅主要检查内容患者病情评估及告知制度 医疗质量存在问题（包括患者姓名、住院号、存在问题、相关责任人等）实行患者病情评估制度不全面，未遵循诊疗规范制定诊疗计划并进行定期评估，未根据患者病情变化和评估结果调整诊疗方案，治疗参与率不合格。 改进措施全面推行《患者病情评估及告知制度》，由中级以上资质主管医师填写。普通患者诊疗方案由主治医师以上人员确定，疑难危重患者方案需经副高以上人员确定。诊疗方案随病情变化和评估结果及时调整，检查治疗计划及方案调整、分析在病历中须有记录，制定鼓励措施，加强治疗的参与及中成药、治疗技术的使用。 效果评价质量与安全管理内容进一步丰富，落到实处，质量有所改进。 质控员签字年月日科主任签字年月日
质量管理与持续改进典型案例报告 案例： 终末病历中患者年龄记录多处不一致。 一、发现问题 终末病历评审组发现“多份终末病历中患者年龄记录多处不一致” 上报 医务科分析：可能出现引发医疗纠纷，定性为“医 疗安全不良事件” 、P1:分析影响因素及主要因素 患方因素 手病历中出现年龄多处错误 P2:制定整改措施 1?患者入院填写入院证时应根据患者有效证件或打电话核实患者真实 年龄。 2.制定关于“外院检查单错误管理办法规定”。 入院时未带 有效证件 X. 提供外院 检查单错误 存在“阴、阳” 两个岁数 身份证与 实际年龄不符 原因 医师马虎大意科室质控科主任审核制度制定 责任心不强未尽到责任出科病历不严存在缺陷科室未联网 上报 医院因素 检验科与
3.将出现错误的病案号及主管医师姓名向科室通报，要求分析原因，提出改进措施。 4.加强医院信息化建设，尽快实现辅助科室与临床科室联网，避免因临床医师书写字迹潦草导致检验科输错患者年龄。 5.向相关科室及主任、责任医师下发医疗安全警示。 D :实施 1.医务科制作《医疗质量与安全持续改进委员会简报》下发各科室进行通报。插图片 2.医务科制定《外院检查单错误管理办法规定》报医疗技术管理委员会审核通过后，下发各科室。插图片 3.医务科给相应科室下发《医疗安全不良事件预警通告》。插图片 4.院周会分管副院长安排信息科联系软件公司进行临床科室与辅助科室联网。 C:检查 实施了相关措施后，科室QQC质量小组）及医务科对计划落实情况采用不定期抽查方式进行检查。 检查内容： --环节质量每位医师是否严格执行整改措施 --终末质量终末病历评审组审核病历 做好相关记录将查出问题反馈给科室，科室进行原因分析并提出整改措施。医务科评价，检查进入第二个循环。 A：评价结果
医疗质量持续改进记录表填写要求 1、科室成立以科主任为组长的医疗质量管理小组，并设有专职质控员。 2、本医疗质量持续改进记录表由科主任负责，质控员负责填写。 3、每年度科室要制订医疗质量持续改进计划及医疗质量控制指标。 4、科室根据医院的医疗质量控制重点内容制订每月医疗质量控制重点内容。 5、日常科室医疗质量持续改进记录表要求每月至少检查一次，并做好记录，根据存在问题制订整改措施，并对整改措施进行效果评价，由科主任审阅后签字负责。 6、每月底对科室质量控制情况进行认真总结，填写每月医疗质量控制总结，科主任签字后交医务科审查。 7、每年底对本年度科室医疗质量控制情况进行总结。
科室医疗质量管理小组成员及职责分工 科室医疗质量管理小组成员： 组长： 成员； 质控员： 科室医疗质量管理小组职责： 科室医疗质量管理小组负责科室医疗质量管理，制定科室医疗质量管理措施和考核办法，督促医务人员执行各项规章制度和诊疗规范，对科室的医疗质量进行检查和考核。科室主任是科室质量管理的第一责任人。 具体职责分工： ：对科室的医疗质量负总责，兼病历质控。 ：负责对科室的医疗质量进行检查和考核。 ：负责对护理质量进行检查和考核。
2009年度科室质量控制计划 一、需要改进的内容 （一）医疗制度、医疗技术 1.重点抓好医疗核心制度的落实：首诊负责制度、三级医师查房制度、疑难危重病例讨论制度、会诊制度、危重患者抢救制度、分级护理制度、死亡病例讨论制度、交接班制度、病历书写规范、查对制度、抗菌药物分级管理制度、知情同意谈话制度等。 2．加强医疗质量关键环节的管理。 3．加强全员质量和安全教育，牢固树立质量和安全意识，提高全员质量管理与改进的意识和参与能力，严格执行医疗技术操作规范和常规。 4．加强全员培训，医务人员“基础理论、基本知识、基本技能”必须人人达标。 （二）病历书写 1.《病历书写规范》的再学习和再领会，《住院病历质量检查评分表》讲解和学习； 2.病历书写中的及时性和完整性，字迹的清楚性； 3.体检的全面性和准确性； 4.上级医生查房的及时性和记录内容的规范性； 5.日常病程记录的及时性和完整性（包括上级医生的医疗指示，疑难危重病人的讨论记录，危重抢救病人的抢救记录，重要化验、特殊检查和病理结果的记录和分析，会诊记录、死亡记录和死亡讨论记录等）； 6.治疗知情同意记录的规范性（包括住院病人72小时内知情同意谈话记录，特殊检查、治疗的知情同意谈话记录，医保患者自费＜特殊＞药品和器械知情同意谈话记录等）； 7.治疗的合理性（特别是抗精神病药及抗生素的使用、更改、停用有无记录和药物的不良反应有无报告和记录，处方〈包括精神、麻醉处方〉的合格率等）； 8.归档病历是否及时上交，项目是否完整； （三）护理及医院感染管理 1．各班职责落实情况； 2．基础护理符合率及并发症发生率； 3．专科护理到位情况； 4．病房管理情况：是否安静、整洁、舒适、安全； 5．护理文书书写的规范性； 6．急救药品、器械的管理； 7．医院感染突发事件应急处理能力； 8．医院感染散发病历报告落实情况； 9．清洁、消毒、灭菌执行情况； 10．手卫生与自身防护落实； 11．抗菌药物合理使用； 12．一次性无菌物品是否按规范使用； 13．多重耐药菌的预防与控制； 14．医疗废物的管理； 15．加强医院感染预防与控制的各项工作。
医疗质量安全管理与持续改进记录本 科室： 年度：
填表说明： 1、本手册内容作为科室质量控制管理工作质量考核依据，必须按时如实认真记录和填写。 2、有关数据要将原始资料妥善保存，以备查验。 3、本手册按年度编制，每年一册，已填写的手册由科室妥善保存备查。 4、对科室质量控制考核自查存在的问题，要科室质量控制小组会议上做出小结，并提出整改措施和处罚意见。 5、科室组织的相关学习，要有讲义。 6、科室组织的考试要有试卷和成绩登记。
陕西煤炭建设公司总医院 2016年医疗质量与安全管理和持续改进实施方案 医疗质量与安全是医院发展之本，优质的医疗质量必然产生良好的社会效益和经济效益。为保证我院在医疗市场竞争中保持优势、不断发展，为正确有效地实施标准化医疗质量与安全管理，结合我院实际，特制定本方案。 一、总则 （一）实行全面质量与安全管理和全程质量控制。建立从患者就医到离院，包括门诊医疗、病房医疗和部分院外医疗活动的全程质量与安全控制流程和全程质量管理体系。明确管控内容并将其纳入医疗管理部门的日常工作，实施动态监控并与科室目标责任制结合，保证质控措施的落实。 （二）医疗质量与安全管理以规章制度和医疗常规为依据，并不断修订完善。管理工作强化医疗核心制度及监督实施，如三级医师负责制度、会诊制度和病例讨论制度等，将医务人员个人医疗行为最大限地引导到正确的诊疗方案中。 （三）本院所有参与医疗活动人员(包括高退休返聘、招聘员工、试用期员工) 均适用本方案。 （四）陕西煤炭建设公司总医院医疗质量与安全管理委员会负责医院医疗质量管理控制工作，日常工作由医务科负责。医疗质量与安全管理委员会有权利按照木方案对科室、部门、个人进行奖罚。 （五）监控指标：参照卫生部《二级综合医院评审标准实施细则（2012版）》、《陕西省综合医院质量考核标准》和《陕西省医疗机构杓临床基础质量考核标准》中对二级医院的具体质量指标和各类技术规范、要求。 二、继续完善和加强质量管理体系 全程医疗质量控制系统的人员组成可分为医院医疗质量与安全管理委员会及医务科质量与安全控制办公室、科室医疗质量与安全控 制小组和各级医务人员自我管理三级管理体系。 （一）医院医疗与安全质量管理委员会 医院医疗质量与安全管理委员会由院领导和各临床医技负责人组成，院长任主任，院长是医疗质量与安全管理工作的第一责任者。医务科、护理部、院感办等为医院质量与安全管理职能部门，其职责分述如下： 1、医疗质量与安全管理委员会职责 （1）委员会负责完成医院医疗质量与安全管理，对医院医疗质 量与安全进行综合评估。
盛年不重来，一日难再晨。及时宜自勉，岁月不待人。 医疗质量管理与持续改进 记录表
科室：外科 年度：2017年 医疗质量持续改进记录表填写要求 1、科室成立以科主任为组长的医疗质量管理小组，并设有专职质控员。 2、本医疗质量持续改进记录表由科主任负责，质控员负责填写。 3、每年度科室要制订医疗质量持续改进计划及医疗质量控
制指标。 4、科室根据医院的医疗质量控制重点内容制订每月医疗质量控制重点内容。 5、日常科室医疗质量持续改进记录表要求每月至少检查一次，并做好记录，根据存在问题制订整改措施，并对整改措施进行效果评价，由科主任审阅后签字负责。 6、每月底对科室质量控制情况进行认真总结，填写每月医疗质量控制总结，科主任签字后交医务科审查。 7、每年底对本年度科室医疗质量控制情况进行总结。 科室医疗质量管理小组成员及职责分工 科室医疗质量管理小组成员： 组长：邵明革主任
成员；王丹护士长、刘家俭主治医师、 质控员：邵明革主任（兼） 科室医疗质量管理小组职责： 科室医疗质量管理小组负责科室医疗质量管理，制定科室医疗质量管理措施和考核办法，督促医务人员执行各项规章制度和诊疗规范，对科室的医疗质量进行检查和考核。科室主任是科室质量管理的第一责任人。 具体职责分工： 邵明革主任：对科室的医疗质量负总责，兼病历质控。 王东主治医师：负责对科室的医疗质量进行检查和考核。 王丹护士长：负责对护理质量进行检查和考核。 2017年度科室质量控制计划 一、需要改进的内容 （一）医疗制度、医疗技术
1.重点抓好医疗核心制度的落实：首诊负责制度、三级医师查房制度、疑难危重病例讨论制度、会诊制度、危重患者抢救制度、分级护理制度、死亡病例讨论制度、交接班制度、病历书写规范、查对制度、抗菌药物分级管理制度、知情同意谈话制度等。 2．加强医疗质量关键环节的管理。 3．加强全员质量和安全教育，牢固树立质量和安全意识，提高全员质量管理与改进的意识和参与能力，严格执行医疗技术操作规范和常规。 4．加强全员培训，医务人员“基础理论、基本知识、基本技能”必须人人达标。 （二）病历书写 1.《病历书写规范》的再学习和再领会，《住院病历质量检查评分表》讲解和学习； 2.病历书写中的及时性和完整性，字迹的清楚性； 3.体检的全面性和准确性； 4.上级医生查房的及时性和记录内容的规范性； 5.日常病程记录的及时性和完整性（包括上级医生的医疗指示，疑难危重病人的讨论记录，危重抢救病人的抢救记录，重要化验、特殊检查和病理结果的记录和分析，会诊记录、死亡记录和死亡讨论记录等）；
麻醉科日常质量控制与持续改进记录时间2016-05-06星期五地点手术室医师办公室检查人员 检查内容手术室内日常临床麻醉工作 当月工作小结手术麻醉总例数288例 医疗纠纷、医疗事故发生例数0例 全身麻醉例数35例12% 椎管内麻醉例数149例52% 院内会诊、协助抢救危重患者例数6例 麻醉记录单合格例数265例92% 手术安全核查记录表、手术风险评估表不合格例数 5例 1.7% 严重麻醉并发症发生例数2例0.7% 术中变更麻醉方法例数 2例 0.7% 择期手术术前访视例数170例100% 术后随访例数 288例100% 术后镇痛例数 146例51% 业务学习次数12人次 病例讨论次数0 每月考试考核合格率合格 麻醉药品及麻醉处方管理良好 手术室内日常质控工作完成情况较好 医疗质量存在的问题（包括患者姓名、住院号、麻醉单号）姓名住院号手术名称麻醉存在问题医师261559 剖宫产术腰硬1无房间号体重血 型 2药物无单位 丁伟 261665 肩锁关节固 定术 臂丛1无房间号体重血 型 2药物无单位 丁伟 261573 疝修补术氯胺酮无氯胺酮总量袁德凤 261528 甲状腺切除全麻麻醉结束标志在手 术结束之前 袁德凤261788 剖宫产术腰硬 1无房间号体重血 型 2无药物单位 丁伟
医疗质量存在的问题（包括患者姓名、住院号、麻醉单号、存在问题与缺陷以及相关责任人等） 3液体量上下不一 致 262253 剖宫产术腰硬未勾画腰麻张延勇 262259 腹腔镜下卵 巢切除术 全麻窦性心动过缓患者 应用右旋美托嘧啶 单位 262313 剖宫产术硬膜外1无房间号体重血 型 2药物无单位 丁伟 262313 尺桡骨骨折 内固定 氯胺酮1无氯胺酮总量 2无液体总量 张延勇 262360 阑尾切除术硬膜外1无房间号体重血 型 丁伟 262330 尺骨内固定臂丛无麻醉方法袁德凤 262481 腹腔镜胆囊 切除术 全麻无七氟醚吸入标示袁德凤 262489 腹腔镜胆囊 切除术 全麻拔除导管在手术结 束之前 丁伟 261762 剖宫产术腰硬合并症与诊断重复褚衍强 261851 剖宫产术腰硬未勾画腰麻张延勇 261813 剖宫产术腰硬1无穿刺间隙 2药物无单位 丁伟 261916 剖宫产术硬膜外药物无单位褚衍强 261936 剖宫产术腰硬麻黄碱记录在地塞 米松上 丁伟 261996 肱骨骨折固 定术 氯胺酮无氯胺酮总量褚衍强 262044 剖宫产术腰硬未勾画腰麻张延勇 262206 剖宫产术硬膜外未记录助产士袁德凤 261119 胫骨内固定腰硬未勾画腰麻丁伟 261264 疝修补术氯胺酮 1年龄记录为1.2岁 2无房间号体重单 位 3无氯胺酮总量 丁伟1、手术麻醉结束后部分医师没有亲自配送患者返回病房； 2、麻醉中所用药物有漏开处方现象，部分麻醉处方开具不规范，存在不填写身份证号码等问题； 3、麻醉记录单质量较之以前有好转，但仍存在有不规范
蕉岭县中医医院影像科医学影像质量管理与持续改进自查报告 为加强影像科的质量管理，规范医疗行为、消除安全隐患、保障患者就医安全，根据等级医院评审要求和本科室的具体情况，就3月份医疗质量控制分析总结如下： 1. 工作人员无违规、违纪现象，无接待、投诉，出勤率：100%。 2. 机器运行、维护：B超（含彩超）运行正常，CT机故障，X光机老化，基本运行正常，CR机故障。 3. 工作人员紧张，排班困难，依法执业欠缺（B超室存在助理医师单独值班情况）。 4. 我科医疗设备得不到及时维修或更新，一定程度上影响了相关业务的深入开展。 5. 防护设施及标识仍然没到位。 6. 治疗室的相关问题仍然存在。 7. 科室成员不能完全熟记核心医疗制度（其原因医院所发核心制度内容大部分与我科情况不符）。 8. 在实际工作中核心医疗制度执行不够好，如诊断报告书写不规范(无统一标准)，描述术语与诊断结果混为一谈；技术操作不规范（设备老化、陈旧）。 9. 工作积极性不高（设备条件差，人员紧张，患者量大，个人收入入不敷出）。 建议解决措施： 1. 以此次创等级医院活动为契机，进一步深入开展“以病人为中心，以提高医疗质量为主题”的医院管理活动，强化管理措施，优化人员素质，求真务实，开拓创新，不断提高医疗服务质量和技术服务水平。 2. 核心制度的落实，加强学习，定期抽查，要做到有制度，就得掌握，并落实到位。 3. 切实健全完整的报告书写规范，认真落实报告审核制度，定期审核评估，与奖金挂钩。 4. 加强政治、医德医风和相关法律法规的学习，统一思想，提高医务人员的积极性。 5. 加强业务学习，不断提高医务人员的业务技术水平，提高医疗质量，为患者更好的服务。 6. 加强人文知识和礼仪知识的学习和培养，增强医务人员的沟通技巧。 7. 科室存在的具体客观问题（设备、人员和业务学习等），及时上报医院，希望医院根据具体情况酌情解决。
医疗质量/安全管理与持续改进记录本 （临床科室） 科室： 年度：
填写要求 医疗质量与安全是医院管理的核心，是医院发展的基石，科室作为医院的基本组成单元，其质量的高低直接影响到医院质量的优劣；根据短板原理，一个质量不合格的科室严重影响整个医院的质量，甚至影响到医院的生存；另外，在质量管理体系之中，执行层即科室层面的质量管理是体系中的重中之重。为规范科室质量管理，并使之规范化、科学化、制度化，根据《二级综合医院评审标准实施细则》及医院实际情况，特要求如下： 1、科室质量管理小组组成合理，主任为管理小组组长，组员由副主任、护士长、各组科室质控员组成。 2、科室医疗质量与安全管理方案及目标应结合医院年度医疗 质量与安全管理方案及《科主任的目标责任书》而制定，结合科室实际情况而定。 3、科室医疗安全方面的培训、教育记录：每月至少一次，含法律法规、知情同意、不良事件报告管理制度、实施患者安全目标的相关制度、医疗纠纷防范等与医疗安全工作相关的内容。 4、科室医疗质量与安全控制记录：每月至少检查2次，并有反馈和整改记录。涵盖核心制度落实检查、危急值报告、医疗不良事件、疑难病例讨论、患者知情同意制度、查对制度、依法执业、科室医疗设备维护、故障检修等内容。 5、质量分析会：每月1次，内容与医院医务科、护理部、医院感染管理科等职能部门的督查考核、科室自查相呼应，并有改进措施。
目录 1．科室简介 2．科室医疗质量与安全管理制度 3. 科室医疗质量与安全管理小组组成及职责4．科室年度医疗质量与安全管理方案 5．科室年度医疗质量与安全管理计划 6．科室医疗质量与安全培训记录 7．科室医疗质量与安全控制记录 8．科室医疗质量与安全分析会 9. 医疗纠纷及不良事件调查、处理及整改记录 10. 科室季度医疗质量与安全管理工作总结 11、科室年度医疗质量与安全管理工作总结
护理质量管理与持续改进记录本科室: 中医医院护理部 二0一年
护理质量管理与持续改进记录本填写说明 一、护理质量管理与持续改进记录本均由护士长填写； 二、科室护理质量管理方案 1．护理质量管理措施，为达到科室年度护理质量管理目标，保证各项护理质量指标合格而拟定的提高科内护理质量的相关措施。 2．科室护理质量管理实行科主任领导下的护士长负责制，科内护理质量管理小组具体分工和全科护士参与的质量管理模式。 三、护理质量管理记录表 护士长每周对科内护理质量管理内容应进行不少1次的检查，将检查时间，检查中存在问题、管理措施及管理效果情况记录在相应的记录表上。 四、护理质控小结 护士长每季度进行一次护理质控小结，对科内护理质量管理中存在的问题，进行全面分析，采取的有效措施，突出的管理效果，需改进的环节，并做好详细记录。 五、中医专科特色护理质量评价 护士长每季度进行一次中医专科特色护理质量评价，对存在的问题，进行分析，采取的有效措施。 六、临床护理质量指标 护士长每月进行一次临床护理质量指标统计 七、专科护理质量指标 护士长根据科室相关专科每月进行一次专科护理质量指标统计 八、护理工作质量指标 护士长每月进行一次护理工作质量指标统计 九、科室临床护理管理监控情况表
护士长每季度根据临床护理管理质控情况进行统计 目录 1、护理质量管理及持续改进方案、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、4 2、科室护理质量管理方案、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、9 3、科室护理质量管理架构与职责、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、12 4、科室护理质量管理分工、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、13 5、护理管理记录表、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、14 6、科室护理质量管理分析小结报告、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、35 7、中医专科特色护理质量评价、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、39 8、临床护理质量指标、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、43 9、护理工作质量指标、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、46 10、科室临床护理管理监控情况表、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、47
2016年上半年护理质量汇总分析持续改进报告2016年上半年护理部质量管理工作主要是围绕医院质量与安全管理落实各项护理工作，坚持一切以患者为中心，进行全面护理质量管控，依据年初修订的护理质量标准，按照护理质量与安全管理工作方案及实施计划，每月不定期进行督查，利用PDCA循环达到持续改进临床护理质量，不断提升护理内涵和服务水平。具体分析报告如下： 一、上半年护理质量汇总情况 表1 上半年各项护理质量指标评价汇总达标情况 检查项目评价内容方法 实测值 （实际合格率） 目标值 （分） 达标情况 病区管理2月、5月份根据病区质量管理考核标准现场检查 19个护理单元 98分90达标 护理安全1月、4月根据护理质量安全考核标准现场考核19 个护理单元抢救车、急救药品物品管理 99%100%未达标 院内感染2月、4月根据消毒隔离控制标准现场调查20个护 理单元 98分100未达标 护理服务2月、5月根据住院患者满意度调查表，共调查在 院患者及家属80名 98%90%达标 临床护理（基础护理/分级护理/危重病人护理）3月、4月、6月根据临床护理质量检查考核标准现 场考核19个护理单元，共114名在院患者 98分90达标 护理文书合格率1月、3月、5月根据护理文书质量检查考核标准， 全年共查在院病历140份 98%90达标 护理操作一、二季度共考核操作8项，根据层级安排共126 人次参考 95分90达标 特殊科室专科护理质量每季度现场调查3-5个特殊科护理单元护理质量情 况（ＩＣＵ、手术室、急诊科、透析室、供应室） 96分90达标 优质护理每季度对优质护理病区现场检查95分90达标身份识别制度执行率抽查15-19个护理单元共120名护士99%100% 值班交接班制度落实率抽查15-19个个护理单元120名护士97%100% 输血查对制度落实率抽查15-19个个护理单位共30名护士96.6%100% 给药安全制度落实率抽查15-19个个护理单位共120名护士98%100% 交接班安全管理抽查15-19个个护理单位共120名护士97%100%
护理质量持续改进记录（科内自查） 科室：检查日期：年月日检查者：项 目 内容 检 查 内 容 静脉输液 存在问题1、血压计袖带、止血带、垃圾分类落实不到位。 2、护士排班、输液不分工 3、处置时，不用治疗车，端盘在室内操作 4、换瓶时，不消毒，液体瓶插上输液管倒放在治疗车上 原因分析1、由于护士配置不足，治疗性工作较多，忽视了基础工作 2、没有按照整体排班，分工不明确，需要提高排班质量。 3、护士对于污染物品存放概念不清楚，未能及时纠正 4、护士无菌意识薄弱 整改措施1、加强管理，应协助整理好物品 2、全院护士长要求整体排班，责任到人。 3、学习常规物品消毒制度，督促护士加强学习 效果评价1、分析存在的问题，使每位护士从主观上有正确认知。 2、常规物品消毒制度落实到位。 3、遵守操作制度 评价日期：年月日评价者： 护理质量持续改进记录（科内自查） 科室：检查日期：年月日检查者：
项 目 内容 检 查 内 容 静脉输液 存在问题1、消毒包、无菌包放在办公室、护士站的台面上 2、化验标本，放在办公台面上 3、采血台、物品柜，物品不分类放置 4：止血带、垫巾数量、清洁问题 原因分析1、由于护士无菌区域无菌观念意识不强 2、护士对于污染物品存放概念不清楚 3、没有遵守无菌操作原则 整改措施1、对新入院护士进行无菌原则、观念分析应用培训。 2、治疗车不够用要提出计划 3、护理单元内卫生明确分工。 4、严格物品分类存放 效果评价1、无菌区清洁区明确划分 2、物品分类放置 3、遵守一人一巾一代一带及物品消毒原则 评价日期：年月日评价者： 护理质量持续改进记录（科内自查） 科室：检查日期：年月日检查者：项 目 内容
XXX医科大学xxx附属医院 医疗质量管理与持续改进 记 录 本 科室：XXX科（ICU相关科室 啊） 年度：2016年度 医疗质量管理与持续改进记录本填写要求 1、科室成立以科主任为组长的医疗质量管理小组，并设有专职质控员。 2、本医疗质量持续改进记录表由科主任负责，质控员负责填写。
3、每年度科室要制订医疗质量持续改进计划及医疗质量控制指标。 4、科室根据医院的医疗质量控制重点内容制订每月医疗质量控制重点内容。 5、日常科室医疗质量持续改进记录表要求每月至少检查一次，并做好记录，根据存在问题制订整改措施，并对整改措施进行效果评价，由科主任审阅后签字负责。 6、每月底对科室质量控制情况进行认真总结，填写每月医疗质量控制总结，科主任签字后交医务科审查。 7、每年底对本年度科室医疗质量控制情况进行总结。 科室医疗质量管理小组成员及职责分工 科室医疗质量管理小组成员： 组长： XXX主任 副组长： XX护士长 质控员： XXX主治医师、XXXX主治医师 XXX主治医师、XXX主治医师 XXXX主治医师、XXXX住院医师 XXXX住院医师 科室医疗质量管理小组职责： 科室医疗质量管理小组负责科室医疗质量管理，制定科室医疗质量管理措施和考核办法，督促医务人员执行各项规章制度和诊疗规范，对科室的医疗质量进
行检查和考核。科室主任是科室质量管理的第一责任人。 具体职责分工： 一、需要改进的内容 （一）医疗制度、医疗技术 1.重点抓好医疗核心制度的落实：首诊负责制度、三级医师查房制度、疑难危重病例讨论制度、会诊制度、危重患者抢救制度、分级护理制度、死亡病例讨论制度、交接班制度、病历书写规范、查对制度、抗菌药物分级管理制度、知情同意谈话制度等。 2．加强医疗质量关键环节的管理。 3．加强全员质量和安全教育，牢固树立质量和安全意识，提高全员质量管理与改进的意识和参与能力，严格执行医疗技术操作规范和常规。 4．加强全员培训，医务人员“基础理论、基本知识、基本技能”必须人人达标。 （二）病历书写 1.《病历书写规范》的再学习和再领会，《住院病历质量检查评分表》讲解和学习； 2.病历书写中的及时性和完整性，字迹的清楚性； 3.体检的全面性和准确性； 4.上级医生查房的及时性和记录内容的规范性； 5.日常病程记录的及时性和完整性（包括上级医生的医疗指示，疑难危重病人的讨论记录，危重抢救病人的抢救记录，重要化验、特殊检查和病理结果的记录和分析，会诊记录、死亡记录和死亡讨论记录等）； 6.治疗知情同意记录的规范性（包括住院病人72小时内知情同意谈话记录，特殊检查、治疗的知情同意谈话记录，医保患者自费＜特殊＞药品和器械知情同意谈话记录等）；
. 年上半年护理质量汇总分析持续改进报告2016年上半年护理 部质量管理工作主要是围绕医院质量与安全管理落实各2016依据年初修订的进行全面护理质量管控，项护理工作，坚持一切以患者为中心，每月不定期进行护理质量标准，按照护理质量与安全管理工作方案及实施计划，循环达到持续改进临床护理质量，不断提升护理内涵和服务督查，利用PDCA 水平。具体分析报告如下： 一、上半年护理质量汇总情况上半年各项护理质量指标评价汇总达标情况表 1 值达标情况目标实测值评价内容方法检查项目（分）（实际合格率） 2月、5月份根据病区质量管理考核标准现场检查98分病区管理90 达标个护理单元1919月根据护理质量安全考核标准现场考核1月、4未达标护理安全100% 99% 个护理单元抢救车、急救药品物品管理个护220月、4月根据消毒隔离控制标准现场调查未达标100 院内感染98分理单元月根据住院患者满意度调查表，共调查在2月、5达标90% 护理服务98% 80名院患者及家属月根据临床护理质量检查考核标准现临床护理（基础护理/6月、34月、分达标90 98分114个护理单元，共名在院患者场考核级护理/危重病人护理）19月根据护理文书质量检查考核标准，月、51月、3达标90 护理文书合格率98% 份全年共查在院病历140126一、二季度共考核操作8项，根据层级安排共达标90 95 护理操作分人次参考个特殊科护理单元护理质量情每季度现场调查3-5达标分96 90 特殊科室专科护理质量况（ＩＣＵ、手术室、急诊科、透析室、供应室）达标95 优质护理分90 每季度对优质护理病区现场检查名护士120 身份识别制度执行率100% 99% 个护理单元共抽查15-19 抽查15-19100% 名护士120 值班交接班制度落实率97% 个个护理单元96.6% 100% 名护士30个个护理单位共输血查对制度落实率抽查15-19 100% 名护士个个护理单位共15-19抽查120 给药安全制度落实率98% 名护士120个个护理单位共抽查15-19 100% 97% 交接班安全管理100% 名护士120个个护理单位共15-19抽查98% 医院药品管理核查100% 98% 管道滑脱管理核查名护士120个个护理单位共15-19抽查. . 二、上半年护理质量达标情况分析 2016年与2015年上半年各项护理质量指标监测同比情况