当前位置:文档之家 > 高性能预应力混凝土桥的预应力损失比较

高性能预应力混凝土桥的预应力损失比较

Comparison of Prestress Losses for a Prestress Concrete

Bridge Made with High-Performance Concrete

P .J.Barr,A.M.ASCE 1;B.M.Kukay 2;and M.W.Halling,A.M.ASCE 3

Abstract:Five prestressed concrete girders made with high-performance concrete were instrumented using vibrating-wire strain gages.Their behavior was monitored for three years from the time of casting.The measured change in concrete strain at the centroid of the prestressing strands was used to evaluate changes in prestress.The total measured prestress loss was as large as 28%of the total jacking stress.Due to the higher stresses,this loss is larger than would be expected for a girder made with conventional-strength concrete.The observed values of prestress losses were compared with values calculated using the recommended AASHTO LRFD and NCHRP 18-07procedures.The AASHTO LRFD method overpredicted the average prestress losses for the highly stressed Span 2girders by 20%while the NCHRP method underpredicted the average losses by 16%.The NCHRP method was found to be more inclusive and adaptable to regional construction.The calculated NCHRP Span 2losses were found to be within 10%of the average measured losses when the elastic shortening losses were calculated based on measured data and differential shrinkage was calculated based on continuous beams.DOI:10.1061/͑ASCE ͒1084-0702͑2008͒13:5͑468͒

CE Database subject headings:Prestressed concrete;High-strength concrete;Bridge design;Shrinkage;Creep;Bridges,concrete .

Introduction

High-performance concrete ͑HPC ͒is a class of concrete that pro-vides enhanced performance properties such as increased strength or improved durability for a given application.Additives such as microsilica,fly ash,chemical admixtures,or other materials,in-cluded individually or in various combinations,are substituted for portions of materials in conventional concrete to obtain these spe-cial characteristics.The high strength would be beneficial in pre-cast,prestressed girders to obtain ͑1͒the use of fewer girders per span;͑2͒longer spans;or ͑3͒girders with reduced height where grade clearance is a problem.Other structural members would be reduced,resulting in less weight.The use of HPC in the bridge deck may also enhance the corrosion resistance properties of the concrete to the intrusion of corrosive chemicals.

Despite the apparent benefits of using high-performance con-crete,there are reasons why it has not yet been widely used in prestressed members.Current methods for calculating prestress losses,such as those advocated by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ͑AASHTO 2004͒and the Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute ͑PCI 1975͒,were based on the observed behavior of conventional concrete,with strengths usually below 41.4MPa ͑6,000psi ͒.In particular,several equa-tions for calculating prestress losses are empirically related to

concrete strength.Because incorrect calculations of prestress losses can lead to unacceptable service performance,these losses need to be accurately predicted.

The appropriateness of applying current design methods to high-performance concrete needs to be evaluated.For example,elastic shortening and creep are two major components of the total prestress loss.Because a HPC girder will almost certainly be more highly stressed than one made with conventional concrete,the magnitude of those loss components will probably increase.It is unknown whether this difference in prestress loss is adequately taken into account by present methods of analysis.In response to these concerns,several research projects have been performed in order to quantify the response of prestress concrete girder bridges fabricated with high-performance concrete.Ahlborn et al.͑1998͒compared the AASHTO LRFD design provisions with the mea-sured response of two long-span,high-strength composite pre-stressed bridge girders.They found that the design specifications overestimated the high-strength concrete modulus of elasticity re-sulting in underpredicted elastic shortening losses and overpre-dicted the creep and shrinkage losses.Roller et al.͑1995͒performed an experimental investigation with four high-strength concrete bridge girders.Two of the girders were used to evaluate the early-age flexural properties and the remaining two were used to determine the long-term behavior.The researchers concluded that prestress concrete girders made with high-strength concrete can be expected to adequately perform if designed according to the AASHTO standard specifications .Kowalsky et al.͑2001͒in-strumented four prestress high-performance concrete bridge gird-ers in North Carolina.These researchers found that the elastic shortening and creep losses were major contributors to the total losses with shrinkage losses much less so.The larger than ex-pected elastic shortening and creep losses were attributed to a lower modulus of elasticity than predicted.The total prestress losses ranged from 12.9to 19.1%of the initial jacking stress.Other HPC bridge research can be found in Shams and Kahn ͑2000͒,Lopez et al.͑2003͒,and Waldron ͑2004͒.

The Washington State Department of Transportation

1Associate Professor,Dept.of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Utah State Univ.,4110Old Main Hill,Logan,UT 84332-4110.2

Ph.D.Candidate,Dept.of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Utah State Univ.,4110Old Main Hill,Logan,UT 84332-4110.3

Associate Professor,Dept.of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Utah State Univ.,4110Old Main Hill,Logan,UT 84332-4110.

Note.Discussion open until February 1,2009.Separate discussions must be submitted for individual papers.The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on August 14,2006;approved on November 16,2007.This paper is part of the Journal of Bridge Engineering ,V ol.13,No.5,September 1,2008.©ASCE,ISSN 1084-0702/2008/
5-468–475/$25.00.

Note.Discussion open until February 1,2009.Separate discussions must be submitted for individual papers.The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on August 14,2006;approved on November 16,2007.This paper is part of the Journal of Bridge Engineering ,V ol.13,No.5,September 1,2008.©ASCE,ISSN 1084-0702/2008/5-468–475/$25.00.

468/JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING ©ASCE /SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2008

J. Bridge Eng., 2008, 13(5): 468-475

D o w n l o a d e d f r o m a s c e l i b r a r y .o r g b y H e b e i U n i v e r s i t y o f

E n g i n e e r i n g o n 03/12/16. C o p y r i g h t A S C E .

F o r p e r s o n a l u s e o n l y ; a l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d .

下载Word文档免费下载:

高性能预应力混凝土桥的预应力损失比较下载

(共8页)

预应力混凝土连续桥梁的施工控制研究

预应力混凝土连续桥是桥梁中一种具有优良特性的桥梁类型,该 型桥梁力学性能优良,...较大的差异,在进行有限元 分析时还需要考虑施工荷载、混凝土徐变特性、预应力损失...

预应力混凝土桥梁发展概况

方面有竞争力的方案 钢—混凝土组合式预应力桥梁,...预应力混凝土材料 (一)混凝土材料 1.高性能混凝土HPC...替代钢板的纤维增强塑料板, 出现腹板为FRP的预应力...

预应力砼连续梁桥维修与加固技术

关键词:预应力混凝土;桥梁工程;连续梁;维修;加固 近年来,随着高强、高性能混凝土...桥梁工程中存在着严重的温度 变化、混凝土收缩徐变、支座不均匀沉降、预应力损失...

预应力砼连续梁桥维修与加固技术

关键词:预应力混凝土;桥梁工程;连续梁;维修;加固 近年来,随着高强、高性能混凝土...桥梁工程中存在着严重的温度变化、 混凝土收缩徐变、支座不均匀沉降、预应力损失...

2混凝土梁桥预应力张拉质量控制及锚下有效预应力检测技术

摘要预应力钢束是对预应力混凝土桥梁构架当中十分重要的部件,其性能的好坏直接决 定整体的使用情况,预应力损失很大程度上会对桥梁的形状、结构以及使用年限产生很 大...

混凝土桥梁有效预应力检测及

即使计算值精确(其实 目前难达到),由于结构性能的变化,实际的永存预应力值 ...《桥规》建立的 预应力损失理论 从属模式判别 模块二 拟摩阻损失函数 0.95≤ ...

桥博计算先张预应力混凝土空心板梁损失

桥博计算先张预应力混凝土空心板梁损失 - 高 金: 桥博计算先张预应力混凝土空心板梁损失 61 桥博计算先张预应力混凝土空心板梁损失 高金( 上海勘测设计研究院, ...

探析预应力混凝土连续桥梁施工

预应力混凝土连续桥是桥梁中一种具有优良特性的桥梁类型,该型桥梁力学性能优良,伸...较大的差异,在 进行有限元分析时还需要考虑施工荷载、混凝土徐变特性、预应力损失...

预应力混凝土箱梁桥腹板受力分析及预应力损失研究

预应力混凝土箱梁桥以其特有的优点,如整体性能好、结构刚度大、变形 小、抗震...因此,对箱梁腹板主拉应力的计算分析以及预应力损失的研究具有很重要的工程 意义...

南皮县职称论文发表网-大跨度预应力混凝土桥梁桥梁施工控制论文选题题目

桥梁高性能混凝土早龄期施工控制参数研究 11……大跨预应力混凝土箱梁水化热...预应力损失对大跨度 PC 连续梁桥挠度的影响 57……基于混合算法的大跨度斜拉桥...