?General rules1. IntroductionThe “FLTRP CUP” National English Debating Competition(hereafter referred to as “the Competition”) inaugurated in 1997 is the onlynational English debating event in ... ?
General rules
1. Introduction
The “FLTRP CUP” Nationa l English Debating Competition(hereafter referred to as “the Competition”) inaugurated in 1997 is the onlynational English debating event in China. The FLTRP CUP National EnglishDebating Competition is jointly hosted by the Foreign Language Teaching andResearch Press Cambridge University Press and the International Debate EducationAssociation (IDEA) coordinated by the China English Language EducationAssociation (CELEA) English Speaking Union (ESU) English Language Learningmagazine (ELL) and sponsored by CASIO (Shanghai).
2. Competition Format
The Competition shall be conducted in the BritishParliamentary Debating Style (also known as the World Universities DebatingChampionships Style) as defined in Part 2.
3. Required qualificationsfor the competition
A debater must be a registeredfull-time undergraduate of Chinese nationality in a Chinese territoryeducational institution. Those who have wonoverseas awards of the past CCTV CUP English Speaking Contest or past FLTRP CUPNational English Debating Competition are excluded from participating in theFLTRP Cup.
The British Parliamentary format
1. The Teams
Four teams of two debaters participate in each British Parliamentarydebate round. The teams supporting themotion are referred to as the "Proposition." The teams arguingagainst the motion are known as the "Opposition" teams. Two teams represent the Proposition: theOpening Proposition and the Closing Proposition. Two teams represent the Opposition: theOpening Opposition and the Closing Opposition. Each of these teams competes against all other teams in the round andwill be ranked 1st through 4th at the conclusion of thedebate.
Opening Proposition
Opening Opposition
Closing Proposition
Closing Opposition
2. Speaker Order
Each speaker will present a single speech in the order prescribedbelow. Speaker
Common Titles for Speaker
Time
Opening Proposition Team 1st speaker
"Prime Minister" or “Leader of the Proposition”
7 minutes
Opening Opposition Team 1st speaker
"Leader of the Opposition"
7 minutes
Opening Proposition Team 2nd speaker
"Deputy Prime Minister" or "Deputy Leader of the Proposition"
7 minutes
Opening Opposition Team 2nd speaker
"Deputy Leader of the Opposition"
7 minutes
Closing Proposition Team 1st speaker
"Member of the Proposition" "
7 minutes
Closing Opposition Team 1st speaker
"Member of the Opposition"
7 minutes
Closing Proposition Team 2nd speaker
"Proposition Whip"
7 minutes
Closing Opposition Team 2nd speaker
"Opposition Whip"
7 minutes
3. Speech timing
Each speech will be 7 minutes. Points of Information are allowed after the first minute and before thelast minute of all speeches.
Timing of the speech begins whenthe speaker begins speaking; all material—including acknowledgementsintroductions etc.—will be timed. Atimekeeper will provide a series of signals during each speech as follows:
? TimingSignal1:00Single ring of a bell (POIs allowed)6:00Single ring of a bell (POIs no longer allowed)7:00Double ring of a bell (Conclusion of speaking time)7:15Continuous ringing (Conclusion of ...
? Timing
Signal
1:00
Single ring of a bell (POIs allowed)
6:00
Single ring of a bell (POIs no longer allowed)
7:00
Double ring of a bell (Conclusion of speaking time)
7:15
Continuous ringing (Conclusion of grace period)
Once the double ring has sounded speakers have a 15-second ‘grace period’ during which th ey should conclude their remarks. The grace period is not a time for new matter to be introduced and any new matter offered in the grace period may be discounted by the adjudicators. Speakers continuing after this ‘grace period’ may be penalized by the adjudication panel.
4.Speaker Roles
Each speaker has a role and each speech has a specific purpose. The descriptions of speaker roles listed below are suggestive and are not intended to be exhaustive or exclusive. For reasons that vary from debate to debate speakers may sometimes need to fulfill roles not mentioned here and speeches may be constructed to serve other purposes as long as Proposition speakers affirm the motion and Opposition speakers oppose it.
All speakers except the final speakers for the Proposition and Opposition (Proposition and Opposition Whips) should introduce new material. All debaters should refute the opposing teams’ arguments except the Prime Minister.
Speaker
Role and Responsibility
"Prime Minister" or "Leader of the Proposition”
The first speaker's responsibility is to present a case supporting the motion. The primary role of Opening Proposition team initiated in this speech is to establish the foundation for meaningful debate on the motion.
“Leader of the Opposition"
The Opening Opposition's primary team role is to counter the first Proposition team's case through direct or indirect refutation and/or provide substantive arguments against the motion.
"Deputy Prime Minister"
This speaker should refute the Leader of the Opposition's speech and further develop the Opening Proposition team's case.
"Deputy Leader of the Opposition"
This speaker supports his or her teammate answering objections from the other side and introducing additional arguments or support.
"Member of the Proposition"
This speaker should support the position developed by the Opening Proposition team by introducing an extension. A successful extension will develop a distinct argument identity for the Closing Proposition team while supporting the Opening Proposition team. The Member of the Proposition may also refute the arguments made by the Deputy Leader of the Opposition.
"Member of the Opposition"
This speaker should support the position developed by the Opening Opposition team and must also introduce an extension. As with the Member Proposition the Member Opposition’s extension will be most successful if it establishes a unique argument identity that distinguishes the Closing from the Opening Opposition while continuing the general direction of argument initiated by the Opening Opposition. The Member Opposition may also directly or indirectly refute the arguments of the Member Proposition.
?"Proposition Whip"This speaker summarizes the Proposition’s arguments and summarizes the refutation of the Opposition side. With the exception of refuting the Member Opposition’s extension the ...
? "Proposition Whip"
This speaker summarizes the Propos ition’s arguments and summarizes the refutation of the Opposition side. With the exception of refuting the Member Opposition’s extension the speaker should not introduce positive (new) matter.
"Opposition Whip"
This speaker summarizes opposition to the extension and makes reply to each team's position in the debate. This speaker should not introduce positive (new) matter.
5.The Motions
A single motion will be announced thirty minutes prior to the beginning of the debate and will be presented to all debaters simultaneously in a general assembly. A different motion will be used for each round.
Motions typically focus on current issues or timeless controversies and are phrased in a way that is intended to be specific and unambiguous.
6.Focus and content of debates
British Parliamentary debating is a contest of ideas in which the Proposition teams are responsible for providing reasons why the motion is true and the Opposition teams are responsible for providing reasons why the motion is not true or why the Proposition has failed to prove the motion true. All teams have a responsibility to refute either directly or indirectly arguments presented by the opposing side.
Motions are written in plain language. The debaters—particularly the Opening Proposition team—should respect the meaning and focus of the motion. While the Opening Proposition team may clarify the meaning of terms in the motion they should not attempt to alter the meaning of the motion. The Leader of the Proposition should provide any clarification of terms at the beginning of his or her speech.
In the majority of cases the clarification provided by the Opening Proposition team will serve as an adequate foundation for the rest of the debate. Should the Opening Proposition fail to make clear the focus of the debate or if the interpretation offered by the Opening Proposition team completely inhibits meaningful debate or completely misinterprets the meaning the motion the Opening Opposition may offer clarification of the terms of the motion. No teams beyond the Opening Proposition and Opening Opposition may substantially modify the terms of the motion.
7.Preparation
All debates shall commence 30 minutes after the motion has been announced. Debaters may consult any written materials during the preparation time. Except for the designated CASIO electronic dictionary no access to other electronic media or electronic storage or retrieval devices is permitted
after motions have been released. Printed and prepared materials may be accessed during a debate.
Debaters may confer with their debate partner during preparation time. Debaters may also confer with one tutor from their university during the preparation time.Debaters may not confer with any other individuals (i.e.: coaches other debaters trainers adjudicators etc.) during the preparation time.
The Opening Proposition shall have the right to prepare in the debating venue. All other teams must prepare in separate locations.
? Teams must arrive at their chamber within five minutes of the time of commencement of debate. Teams failing to arrive in time will forfeit the debate at the discretion of the Chair of the panel.8 ...
? Teams must arrive at their chamber within five minutes of the time of commencement of debate. Teams failing to arrive in time will forfeit the debate at the discretion of the Chair of the panel.
8.Points of Information
Debaters may request a point of information (either verbally or by rising) at any time after the first minute and before the last minute of any speech.
The debater holding the floor may accept or refuse any points of information within this time. If accepted the debater making the request has fifteen seconds to make a statement or ask a question. During the point of information the speaking time of the floor debater continues. Management of Points of Information—for both the debaters offering and answering Points of Information—will be considered in the adjudicators’ ranking of teams and assignment of individual speaker points.
No other parliamentary points such as points of order or points of personal privilege are allowed.
Competition Administration
1.Structure of the competition
The Competition shall be run in two main phases: phase one known as the ‘Preliminary’ rounds and phase two known as the ‘Elimination’ rounds. There shall be one mock round eight Preliminary rounds and four
Elimination rounds. All teams entered in the Competition shall participate in the Preliminary rounds. Only the top 32 teams will participate in the Elimination rounds.
2.The Mock Round
The mock round will be held as part of the training for the FLTRP Cup. The pairing of the mock round will be random and the results of the mock round will not count for the Preliminary or Elimination rounds.
3.Pairing the Preliminary Rounds
If the total number of teams entered in the Competition is not divisible by four or during the Competition the withdrawal of teams results in a total number of teams not divisible by four the tournament administrators shall employ “swing teams” to fill vacant slots. The swing teams shall be ranked in each round relative to the teams against whom they compete (i.e.: if a swing team is the best team in a round they should be ranked 1st) but will be ineligible to advance to the Elimination rounds.
The first round of the Competition will be paired randomly.
At the conclusion of each preliminary round (except for the last round) teams shall be ranked in order of their aggregate team points accumulated by the team; from highest aggregate to lowest.
The teams should then be divided up into pools of teams with the same amount of aggregate team points with pools being ranked from highest aggregate to lowest.
If any pool (the “Upper Pool”) consists of an amount of teams equivalent to a number that is not divisible by four then teams from the pool ranking immediately below that pool (the “Lower Pool”) may be promoted to the Upper Pool so that the Upper Pool consists of a number of teams that is divisible by four. The team selected for promotion must be selected randomly from the Lower Pool. If promotion of a team to the Upper Pool results in a number of teams in the Lower Pool not divisible by four each consecutive pool should be adjusted in the same fashion until all pools have a number of teams divisible by four.
Once the pools have been adjusted the pools are paired into debates of four teams in such a way that equalizes the team positions in which each team will debate. The pairing should promote to th ...
Once the pools have been adjusted the pools are paired into debates of four teams in such a way that equalizes the team positions in which each team will debate. The pairing should promote to the greatest extent possible equality of distribution of team positions over the Preliminary rounds.
Preliminary rounds 1-6 shall be “open adjudication” with oral adjudications given by the adjudication panel following each debate. Preliminary rounds 7 & 8 shall be “closed” with no oral adjudication (including any disclosure of the results of the round) permitted.
3.Selection of teams for the Elimination Rounds
At the conclusion of the Preliminary rounds the teams shall be ranked in order according to 1) their aggregate team points from the eight preliminary rounds; 2) their aggregate team scores as determined by combining the individual speaker scores for each team member; 3)
head-to-head matches between two teams tied for a rank; and 4) preponderance of first place rankings. If after these tie-breakers are applied a tie still exists the rankings of the tied teams shall be determined by drawing lots. The top thirty-two (32) teams ranked by this method shall be selected to compete in the Elimination rounds.
4.Pairing of Elimination Rounds
There shall be four elimination rounds: Octofinals Quarterfinals Semifinals and Finals. Each Elimination round shall be paired by “folding” the bracket of the top 32 teams as determined by their aggregate team points. For example the first Octofinal round would be comprised of the teams ranked 1st 16th 17th and 32nd. The second Quarterfinal round would be comprised of the teams ranked 2nd 15th 18th and 31st and so on.
5.Advancement of teams through elimination rounds
At the conclusion of each Elimination round debate (with the exception of the Final round) the adjudication panel shall select two of the four teams to advance to the next Elimination round. Those teams assume the highest rankings available in their room (i.e.: for the purposes of ranking the two teams to emerge from the first Octofinal round will be ranked 1st and 16th regardless of their ranking prior to the Octofinal round).
For the Final round the adjudication panel shall select one Championship team. All other teams in the Final round will be designated “Finalists.”
6.Access to debates
In preliminary rounds observers may watch a debate round with the consent of the teams participating in the round. Similarly those interested in photographing or recording video of the preliminary rounds must obtain the consent of the debaters participating in the round.
Elimination rounds are open to all observers subject to the
BP赛制辩论赛的评判标准有哪些？ 2013年06月06日 BP辩论赛评判标准 英语辩论比赛规则要求裁判首先就全场比赛队伍的排名进行排序，然后再对每 一名选手按照个人评分的标准打个人表现分。我们首先介绍如何决定各个队伍排名，再介 绍如何为选手个人打分。 四队的排名 决定四队排名的根本因素在于四队的论点的说服力（persuasiveness）如何，而为了检验其论点的说服力，裁判需要做到： 1）不代入任何预设地，中立地裁判比赛——即不能因为个人主观支持一方观点而忽略另一 方观点 2）运用基本的常识检验辩论逻辑与内容——比如辩手用反常识的论点（如，太阳从西边升 起）裁判可以认定其错误，或者辩手逻辑不成立（如，因为全球粮食紧缺所以政府应当允 许同性恋婚姻）裁判也可以因此不接受具体论点 在裁判中立并给予各队公平的话语权之基础上，裁判需要“全面地评判”辩论设计的 各项细节（HolisticJudging）。比赛中每个辩论队的表现体现在诸多其对比赛的“贡献”（contribution）之上，比如其立论（argument）的质量，驳论（Rebuttal）的质量，正反方二队的拓展论点（extension）的质量，正反方四辩总结陈词（WhipSpeech）的质量，质询（POI）及其回答的质量，每队论点的逻辑体系是否完整，各个论点之间的 逻辑关系如何，等等不一而足。裁判需要在考虑各项因素以后，综合判断哪一个队对辩论 的贡献（即对辩论的推动）最大，按照各队的贡献评价各队的排名。 此外，辩手的台风（Manner）也是辩论的重要因素，但是台风本身并不能成为辩论 质量高的理由。比之于比赛的具体内容（Matter），台风的重要意义在于——内容体现观点本身，而台风体现辩手用什么样的方式表达具体内容——二者都是辩手是否有“说服力” 有机构成。但是对于“说服力”的大小，裁判应当将内容与台风同意考虑。没有内容的辩 论即使语言流畅，也不一定更有说服力；反之一个用轻松欢快的舞台感表达沉重严肃内容 的辩手，很可能由于其内容与表现方式的冲突丧失很大部分的说服力。因此台风是一个需 要具体情况具体分析的因素。 选手的个人得分： 在裁判评判出四队各自的排名以后，裁判需为每位选手打分，评判他们在辩论赛中的 表现。 请注意，按照英式议会制辩论规则——每轮比赛中，各队两位辩手个人得分之和从高 到低的顺序，应与队伍排名一致——即第一名的队伍个人总分应该最高，第二名第二高， 第三名第三高，第四名最低。不能有排名低的队伍总分高的情况出现。 个人得分按内容（Matter）与台风（Manner）各占50%比例打分。总分75分是选手一般来说的平均得分，具体标准见下表。
辩论赛新赛制 一、立论环节 正方一辩首先陈述发言，接着反方一辩陈述发言。发言时间各为2分30秒。 二、盘问环节 (1)反方二辩对正方一辩进行一对一盘问。共计2分钟 (2)正方二辩对反方进行一对一盘问。共计2分钟 (3)盘问方应针对对方立论提出质疑和反驳，被盘问方应针对问题和反驳对本方观点进行巩固。提问和回答都要简洁明确，重复提问和回避问题均要被扣分。 (4)每次提问和回答时间不超过20秒。 三、对攻环节 (1)正反方三辩进行一对一攻辩。时间各为1分30秒。 (2)由正方先行提问。 (3)双方分开及时。 特别提醒：电脑计时器分别为两队计时。当一方队员表示自己发言完毕，另一方计时立刻开始。如果一方的发言时间已经用尽，而另一队还剩余时间，则该队员可继续发言，直到该队的时间用完为止。 四、阶段小结 (1)正方四辩根据盘问和对话环节整体态势进行小结。时间为1分30秒。 (2)反方四辩根据盘问和对话环节整体态势进行小结。时间为1分30秒。 (3)攻辩小结必须紧扣盘问和对话环节，脱离现场的小结将视为犯规将被扣分，严重脱离的，将直接记为零分。 五、自由辩论 ⑴在自由辩论时间里，每一位辩手在发言顺序，时间和次数上都不受限制，但是整队的发言时间累计不超过4分钟。辩手应充分利用这段时间，加强自己的论点，反驳对方言论，如果流于空泛漫骂，则会影响该队分数。 ⑵自由辩论时间开始时，正方的任何一位队员首先起立发言。在他结束发言后，反方的任何一位队员应立刻发言，双方依据程序轮流发言，直到双方时间都用完为止。
⑶计时器将分别为两队计时。当一方队员发言完毕并坐下后，另一方计时立刻开始。当一队的发言时间只剩下半分钟时，铃声提示一声。第二次连续响铃表示时间已到，应立即结束发言。如果一方的发言时间已经用尽，而另一队还剩余时间，则该队队员可继续发言，直到该队的时间用完为止。 六、评委及嘉宾提问环节 (1)本环节由评委或提问嘉宾分别向正方和反方进行质询，提问方的嘉宾和评委不计时，只计回答方时间。 (2) 由双方除四辩以外的任意辩手进行回答，回答时间为2分钟，一位辩手发言完，时间未尽其他辩手可作补充直至时间用尽。 (3)本环节先向正方质询，然后再向反方质询。回答应针对嘉宾或评委的提问进行，回避和无关陈述将视为犯规扣分。 七、总结陈词 (1)在总结陈词阶段，辩论双方应针对辩论会整体态势进行总结陈词。双方时间各为2分30秒。 (2)发言顺序在开赛前由主席抽签决定。 八、观众提问环节 本环节由观众先对反方，再对正方进行质询与提问，每次提问一个问题。观众提问共两轮。 九、主席请评判组退席进行评议。 十、主席宣布复会，并邀请该场评判代表点评比赛。 十一、主席宣布评判组评判结果并宣布本场比赛结束。 注： ①双方队伍需各设置一名教练员，在比赛过程中各有一次叫停的机会，己方教练及辩论队员进行交流，叫停时间为2分钟，每次叫停需在环节结束后方可进行。 ②鼓励思想创新，从不同的角度出发进行辩论，以诙谐、轻松、幽默的语言活跃比赛气氛。
?General rules1. IntroductionThe “FLTRP CUP” National English Debating Competition(hereafter referred to as “the Competition”) inaugurated in 1997 is the onlynational English debating event in ... ? General rules 1. Introduction The “FLTRP CUP” Nationa l English Debating Competition(hereafter referred to as “the Competition”) inaugurated in 1997 is the onlynational English debating event in China. The FLTRP CUP National EnglishDebating Competition is jointly hosted by the Foreign Language Teaching andResearch Press Cambridge University Press and the International Debate EducationAssociation (IDEA) coordinated by the China English Language EducationAssociation (CELEA) English Speaking Union (ESU) English Language Learningmagazine (ELL) and sponsored by CASIO (Shanghai). 2. Competition Format The Competition shall be conducted in the BritishParliamentary Debating Style (also known as the World Universities DebatingChampionships Style) as defined in Part 2. 3. Required qualificationsfor the competition A debater must be a registeredfull-time undergraduate of Chinese nationality in a Chinese territoryeducational institution. Those who have wonoverseas awards of the past CCTV CUP English Speaking Contest or past FLTRP CUPNational English Debating Competition are excluded from participating in theFLTRP Cup. The British Parliamentary format 1. The Teams Four teams of two debaters participate in each British Parliamentarydebate round. The teams supporting themotion are referred to as the "Proposition." The teams arguingagainst the motion are known as the "Opposition" teams. Two teams represent the Proposition: theOpening Proposition and the Closing Proposition. Two teams represent the Opposition: theOpening Opposition and the Closing Opposition. Each of these teams competes against all other teams in the round andwill be ranked 1st through 4th at the conclusion of thedebate.
I. Definition o f r efutation Notes A. Refutation i nvolves o ne d ebater directly r esponding t o a n argument o f a n o pposing d ebater. B. Refutation i nvolves a d ebater objecting t o a n a rgument r aised by s omeone o n t he o ther s ide. II. Purpose o f r efutation A. To d eny a c ompeting a rgument B. Weaken o r e ven d estroy a n argument C. To f orce t he o riginal d ebater t o generate a b etter a rgument. III. Methods o f r efutation A. Internal m ethod—considering t he standards o f g ood a rguments 1. Acceptability o f e vidence 2. Relevance o f l ink 3. Sufficiency o f l ink B. External m ethod 1. Creating c ounter a rguments 2. Objecting t o o pposing a rguments with a rguments o f y our o wn * C reated S eptember 2012 反驳的定义反驳涉及到一个辩手直接就对方辩手的论点做出反应反驳涉及到一个辩手反对对方辩手所主张的论点反驳的目的否认争议中的论点 弱化甚至摧毁一个论点迫使原来（提出旧论点）的辩手提出更好的论点反驳方法内部手段：从论证逻辑角度加以批驳证据的可接受性逻辑链的关联性 逻辑链的充分性 ＲＡＳ三角：良好论点所 应符合的特征 可接受性 关联性充分性 外部手段 建立相抗论点 以我方既有论点反驳对方论点
辩论赛比赛规则及流程 比赛流程 1.主席致开场词，简要介绍赛况；介绍参赛代表队、评判团成员、嘉宾及比赛规则，双方辩手简短进行自我介绍，由主席宣布比赛开始。 2.正方一辩，进行开场陈词，时间为3分钟。 3.反方一辩，进行开场陈词，时间为3分钟。 4.正方二辩，进行陈词，时间为3分钟。 5.反方二辩，进行陈词，时间为3分钟。 6.正方三辩，进行陈词，时间为3分钟。 7.反方三辩，进行陈词，时间为3分钟。 8.自由辩论，时间为16分钟，正、反方各8分钟。 9.反方四辩，进行总结陈词，时间为4分钟。 10.正方四辩，进行总结陈词，时间为4分钟。 11.主席请评判团退席评议。工作人员对评判团判定分数进行计算，并将比赛结果送交主席及评判团。 12.主席请评判团入席，主席宣布评决开始。由本场比赛评判团代表分析赛情及辩手情况。 13.主席宣布本场比赛优秀辩手获得者及比赛胜负结果。 14.主席宣布比赛结束，请评判团、嘉宾退席。 自由辩论规则 1.自由辩论时间总共为16分钟，正、反方各8分钟。 2.自由辩论发言必须交替进行，自由辩论开始时首先由正方任何一位选手起立发言，发言完毕，反方的任何一位选手即刻发言，双方依次轮流发言，直到双方时间用完为止。 3.在自由辩论时间，双方每一位选手发言顺序和次数都不受限制，但双方总共时间都各为8分钟。 4.在自由辩论中，当一方发言结束，即开始计算另一方的发言时间。 5.如果一方的发言时间已经用尽，另一方还有剩余时间，则有剩余时间方的4位选手仍可轮流发言，直到该队时间用完为止。 辩论赛比赛评分标准及赛制解释 一．辩手个人评分标准：（共计100分） 1、语言表达(40分)：普通话的表达能力，语言是否准确、简明、规范，是否条理清晰，理、据相协。 2、辩论技巧（40分）：辩手是否具备一定的逻辑思维言语流畅、立场明确，能否从多角度、多层次分析、理解、认识辩题，叙述是否有层次性、条理性，论证是否具有说服力。 3、表情风度（20分）：辩手形象气质、表情、手势是否恰当、自然、大方，不强词夺理，尊重对方，尊重主持人、评委和观众，富有幽默感。 二．团队整体评分标准：（共计100分） 1、辩题中心（30分）：发言中心是否明确，主旨是否突出，立论是否全面、严密。 2、内容资料（30分）：论据是否充分、合理、恰当、有力、紧扣主题，充实有力，逻辑合理。引述资料是否正确、翔实。
China Debate Education Network 中国辩论教育网络 Curriculum Outline Learning Guide in Mandarin 课程大纲中文学习指南 （Third Edition 第3版） By Zeng Qingxi 曾庆熹 编著 2013.5
目录 版权声明 (4) 第二版修订说明 (5) 第三版修订说明 (6) 入门篇 规则概述 (7) 进阶篇 重难点与技战术 (10) 第一讲英国议会制辩论导论 (10) 1辩论精神与理念 (10) 2辩手的角色职责 (11) 2.1必须与可以——角色职责中的强制与建议 (11) 第二讲论点建构 (11) 3论点的构成要素 (11) 3.2有的逻辑链看起来完全是不言自明的，一定要讲出来吗？ (12) 3.3多独立证据型论点是不是就是把几个简单论点凑在一起啊？ (13) 3.4后果型论点和原则型论点谁更好呢？ (13) 第三讲正方上院：角色与策略 (13) 4首相角色：立论 (13) 4.1什么是讨论模型？它和辩题是什么关系？ (13) 4.2课件中“巴勒斯坦人”的例子太高端了，没有这方面的知识怎么办？ (14) 4.3设立“讨论模型”是不是就是给出具体的政策措施？ (15) 4.4设立“讨论模型”进行辩题窄化时，是不是做得越窄越好？ (16) 5副首相职责 (17) 5.1相较而言副首相的职责看起来很简单，应该让相对较弱的队员去做吗？ .. 17第四讲反方上院的立论 (18) 6反方上院的职责 (18) 6.1反方上院什么情况下可以挑战定义？怎么挑战定义？ (18) 7建构反方立论 (18) 7.1反方立论的两大基本组合是什么？ (18) 第五讲阁员陈词中的扩展论辩 (20)
机电辩论队3V3辩论赛比赛赛制 1 、主席介绍参赛队及其所持立场 参赛队伍是正和反两队，辩题是“***********” 正方，观点是“*****” 反方，观点是“*************”。 2 、由正方开始，各个参赛队员依次进行自我介绍 3 、主席介绍评委 4 、主席介绍比赛程序 5 、主席宣布比赛开始 第一环节：开篇立论 本环节先由 正方一辩发言，后由反方一辩发言。阐明己方观点，时间分别为每方3分钟。 第二环节：对辩环节 本环节先由反方二辩首先对正方二辩就立论进行提问，被提问辩手进行回答。然后由正方二辩对反方二辩进行提问，被提问辩手进行回答。辩手提问时间为1分钟，回答时间为2分。在此过程中，被提问方不能反问，提问方不能回答问题。每轮提问时间为10秒，回答时间为20秒。 第三环节：自由辩论 正反方时间各三分钟；先由正方任何一名队员起立发言完毕后，反方任何一名队员即刻发言，双方依次轮流发言，当时间剩余30秒时会有哨声提示，直至一方时间用完为止，此时时间剩余一方可以选择继续发言或者放弃剩余时间。在此环节内，每位辩手的发言顺序，次数和时间不受限制。 第五环节：总结陈词 本环节由反方三辩和正方三辩依次发言，先反方后正方。抓对方漏洞，再次阐明总结己方观点，升华己方观点时间分别为3分钟。 6 、比赛结束，评委退席打分，此时观众可以对比赛双方进行提问。 7、请评委代表点评本场辩论赛，并评出双方得分。 8、主持人宣布比赛结果 9、主持人宣布辩论赛结束 辩论赛细则 1.时间提示细则：自由辩论阶段，每方使用时间剩余30秒时，记时员以一次短促的铃声提醒；剩余5秒时有提示音，用时满时，以钟声终止发言。终止
BP赛制介绍 1. 辩论队 每轮英国议会制辩论比赛中有4支辩论队同场，每队2人。支持辩题的队伍称为”正方”，驳斥辩题的队伍称为”反方”。正、反两方分别由两支队伍构成，并分别发表开篇陈述和总结陈词。每一支队伍都需要与另3队进行竞争，最后决出1至4名。 2. 选手发言顺序 每位选手都应按以下顺序进行发言： 发言者发言者的称呼发言时间 正方开篇陈述第一辩手“首相”或”正方领袖” 7分钟 反方开篇陈述第一辩手“反方领袖” 7分钟 正方开篇陈述第二辩手“副首相”或”正方第二领袖” 7分钟 反方开篇陈述第二辩手“反方第二领袖” 7分钟 正方总结陈词第三辩手（即正方二队一辩）“正方成员” 7分钟 反方总结陈词第三辩手（即反方二队一辩）“反方成员” 7分钟 正方总结陈词第四辩手（即正方二队二辩）“正方党鞭” 7分钟 反方总结陈词第四辩手（即反方二队二辩）“反方党鞭” 7分钟 3. 发言计时 每位辩手的发言的时间均为7分钟。辩手提出”质询”的时间应在第2到第6分钟之间。”质询”是指在对方发言时，针对发言者正在申述的论点提出的本方观点。 发言计时从辩手开始说话为始；所有必要内容（包括说明、介绍等）都在计时范围内。计时人员将在以下时间点向选手示意： 时间标示： 第一分钟末响铃一次（允许开始提出”质询”） 第六分钟末响铃一次（提出”质询”的时间结束） 第七分钟末7：00 连续响铃两次（发言时间结束） 超时15秒之后7：15 连续响铃（发言缓冲时间结束） 在连续两次响铃结束后辩手有15秒”缓冲”时间，在这段时间内允许选手总结已出具论点。”缓冲”时间内不允许出具新论据，在”缓冲”时间内提出的新论据可以被裁判判为无效。在”缓冲”时间后仍继续发言的辩手将被裁判团扣分。 4. 辩手角色分配 每个选手都有一个定位，每一个发言都有其特殊目的。下面列出的辩手角色描述具有借鉴作用，并非必须完全遵循。根据不同的辩论形式，辩手有时需要在完成本角色需要说明的部分之外，还要表述其它方面的观点，在正方支持辩题、反方驳斥辩题的基础上，发言结构仍需满足其它论证的需要。 除了辩论双方的第四辩手，其它所有辩手都需要提出自己的论点。除了”首相”，所有辩
1.猜测立论 正方任意辩手(非场上4位辩手)猜测反方立论1分钟 反方任意辩手(非场上4位辩手)猜测正方立论1分钟 2.立论 正方任意辩手进行立论发言3分钟 反方任意辩手进行立论发言3分钟 3.盘问 正方任意辩手进行攻辩,反方任意辩手驳辩。问方时间不得超过15秒，回答时间不得超过30秒。双方累计计时不得超过3分钟。 反方任意辩手进行攻辩,正方任意辩手驳辩。问方时间不得超过15秒，回答时间不得超过30秒。双方累计计时不得超过3分钟。 4.互辩 正反双方各任意派出一名辩手进行互辩。可任意提问回答。双方各1分30秒分开计时 5.阶段小结 正方任意辩手做阶段小结。时间1分30秒 反方任意辩手做阶段小结。时间1分30秒 (至此，以上任意辩手均无限制，但自由辩论之前每位辩手须至少立论、质询或驳辩一次） 6.自由辩 自由辩论正方先发言各4分钟 7.总结陈词 反方任意辩手针对问题及本场赛势做总结陈词3分 正方任意辩手针对问题及本场赛势做总结陈词3分
1.立论 正方一辩陈词3分钟 反方一辩陈词3分钟 2.驳辩 正方二辩陈词3分钟 反方二辩陈词3分钟 3.互辩 正方二辩 反方二辩进行一对一互辩,双方各1分30秒分开计时。 4.一夫当关（外贸自己这么叫...无力吐槽...） 反方三辩向正方一、二、四辩各提一个问题，每个问 题的提问时间不得超过15秒，回答时间不得超过30秒 反方三辩向正方一、二、四辩各提一个问题，每个问 题的提问时间不得超过15秒，回答时间不得超过30秒 5.阶段小结 反方任意辩手攻辩小结1分30秒 正方任意辩手攻辩小结1分30秒 6.自由辩 自由辩论累计时间双方各5分钟 7.总结陈词 反方四辩总结陈词4分钟 正方四辩总结陈词4分钟
辩论赛比赛规则 比赛流程： 1. 主持人致开场辞，简要介绍赛况、赛程和比赛规则，辩论赛开始， 2. 介绍评委及嘉宾， 3. 主持人介绍辩题、正反双方代表队和评判团成员情况， 4. 正反双方自我介绍，介绍所持立场和介绍参赛队员 5. 辩论比赛 6. 评委打分 7. 观众参与提问或表达自己观点 8. 宣布比赛结果 9. 评委点评 10.辩论赛结束 具体流程 立论阶段 （一）正方一辩开篇立论，3分钟 （二）反方一辩开篇立论，3分钟 驳立论阶段 （三）反方二辩驳对方立论，2分钟 （四）正方二辩驳对方立论，2分钟 质辩环节 （五）正方三辩提问反方一、二、四辩各一个问题，反方辩手分别应答。每次提问时间不得超过15秒，三个问题累计回答时间为 2分钟。 （六）反方三辩提问正方一、二、四辩各一个问题，正方辩手分别应答。每次提问时间不得超过15秒，三个问题累计回答时间为 2分钟。 （七）正方三辩质辩小结， 2分钟。 （八）反方三辩质辩小结， 2分钟。 自由辩论 （九）自由辩论每队5分钟 总结陈词 （十）反方四辩总结陈词，3分钟。 （十一）正方四辩总结陈词，3分钟。 赛制具体说明： （一）立论阶段： 由正方双方的一辩选手来完成，要求立论的框架明确，语言通畅，逻辑清晰，能够正确的阐述己方的立场。 （二）驳立论阶段： 这个阶段的发言由双方的二辩来进行，旨在针对对方的立论环节的发言进行回驳和补充己方的立论的观点，也可以扩展本方的立论方向和巩固己方的立场。（三）质辩环节： 这个阶段是，由双方的三辩来完成这个环节，双方的三辩针对对方的观点
和本方的立场设计三个问题，由一方的三辩起来提问对方的一辩，二辩，四辩各一个问题，要求被问方必须回答，不能闪躲，提问方的时间每个问题不可超过十五秒，回答方三个问题的回答累计时间是两分钟，双方的三辩交替提问，由正方开始，在质辩的环节中，要求双方的语言规范和仪态庄重，表述清晰。在质辩结束后，由双方的三辩针对对方的回答进行质辩小节，时间两分钟，由正方开始。（四）自由辩论阶段： 正反双方的八位辩手都要参加，辩论双方交替发言。双方都拥有五分钟的累计发言时间，在一方时间用完后，另外一方可以继续发言，直至本方的时间用完。在这个环节中，要求辩论双方的队员团结合作和整体配合，自由辩论阶段由正方开始 （五）结辩阶段： 针对对方的观点和己方的立场出发，总结本方的观点，阐述最后的立场 评判程序 （一）比赛结束后，评判团成员先将评分表的有关事项逐项填好，然后退场才评议、交流并裁决。 1．评委们将各队队员的单项分数相加，计算出每名队员和每个代表队的得分，同时结合双方辩手在场上的表现，评出“优秀辩手”和“获胜代表队”，并填于评分表上。 2．评判团集体推选一名评委分析赛情，并作评判发言。 3．将含有本场比赛“优秀辩手”和“获胜代表队”名单的评分表交于主持人（即执行主席）。 4．主持人（即执行主席）宣布本场比赛的“优秀辩手”和“获胜代表队”名单，宣布进入下一场比赛的代表队名单，并宣布本场比赛结束。 （二）总决赛后，评出辩论赛“最佳辩手”和优秀代表队，评判团具有最高权威，各代表队应尊重评判团的决定。 其他细则 1．时间提示。辩论中，每方使用时间剩余30秒时，计时员以黄牌提醒。用时满时以出示红牌终止发言，发言辩手必须停止发言，否则作违规处理。 2．计分人员分别在各队的对面，用黄牌或红牌进行时间的提示。并设有“计时器”进行提示。在比赛的各阶段中，举黄牌表示用时的提醒，举红牌示意辩手用时完成，辩手必须停止发言并立即坐下，否则酌情扣分。 3．在辩论过程中，选手可以参照事先准备好的资料（如卡片等），但是不得照读资料时间连续10秒钟。否则将酌情扣除团体分和个人分。
BP 赛制辩论赛的评判标准有哪些？ 2013 年 06 月 06 日 BP 辩论赛评判标准 英语辩论比赛规则要求裁判首先就全场比赛队伍的排名进行排序，然后再对每一 名选手按照个人评分的标准打个人表现分。我们首先介绍如何决定各个队伍排名，再介绍 如何为选手个人打分。 四队的排名 决定四队排名的根本因素在于四队的论点的说服力（persuasiveness）如何，而为 了检验其论点的说服力，裁判需要做到： 1）不代入任何预设地，中立地裁判比赛——即不能因为个人主观支持一方观点而忽略另一 方观点 2）运用基本的常识检验辩论逻辑与内容——比如辩手用反常识的论点（如，太阳从西边升 起）裁判可以认定其错误，或者辩手逻辑不成立（如，因为全球粮食紧缺所以政府应当允 许同性恋婚姻）裁判也可以因此不接受具体论点 在裁判中立并给予各队公平的话语权之基础上，裁判需要“全面地评判”辩论设计的 各项细节（HolisticJudging）。比赛中每个辩论队的表现体现在诸多其对比赛的“贡献” （contribution）之上，比如其立论（argument）的质量，驳论（Rebuttal）的质 量， 正反方二队的拓展论点 （extension） 的质量， 正反方四辩总结陈词 （WhipSpeech） 的质量，质询（POI）及其回答的质量，每队论点的逻辑体系是否完整，各个论点之间的 逻辑关系如何，等等不一而足。裁判需要在考虑各项因素以后，综合判断哪一个队对辩论 的贡献（即对辩论的推动）最大，按照各队的贡献评价各队的排名。 此外，辩手的台风（Manner）也是辩论的重要因素，但是台风本身并不能成为辩论 质量高的理由。比之于比赛的具体内容（Matter），台风的重要意义在于——内容体现观 点本身，而台风体现辩手用什么样的方式表达具体内容——二者都是辩手是否有“说服力” 有机构成。但是对于“说服力”的大小，裁判应当将内容与台风同意考虑。没有内容的辩 论即使语言流畅，也不一定更有说服力；反之一个用轻松欢快的舞台感表达沉重严肃内容 的辩手，很可能由于其内容与表现方式的冲突丧失很大部分的说服力。因此台风是一个需 要具体情况具体分析的因素。
选手的个人得分： 在裁判评判出四队各自的排名以后，裁判需为每位选手打分，评判他们在辩论赛中的 表现。 请注意，按照英式议会制辩论规则——每轮比赛中，各队两位辩手个人得分之和从高 到低的顺序，应与队伍排名一致——即第一名的队伍个人总分应该最高，第二名第二高， 第三名第三高，第四名最低。不能有排名低的队伍总分高的情况出现。 个人得分按内容（Matter）与台风（Manner）各占 50%比例打分。总分 75 分 是选手一般来说的平均得分，具体标准见下表。
1.辩论赛开始 2.宣布比赛规则 3.介绍评委及嘉宾 4.宣布辩题 5.介绍参赛代表队及所持立场 6.介绍参赛队员 7.辩论比赛 8.评委打分 9.观众参与提问或表达自己观点 10.宣布比赛结果 11.评委点评 12.辩论赛结束
1．时间提示。辩论中，每方使用时间剩余30秒时，计时员给予提醒。用时满时，发言辩手必须停止发言。 2．陈词。阐述证据确凿充分，引用适当。 3．开篇立论。立论要求以事实为依据，以法律为准绳，逻辑清晰，言简意赅。4．攻辩 （1）攻辩由正方二辩开始，正反方交替进行。 （2）正反方二、三辩参加攻辩。正反方一辩作攻辩小结。正反方二、三辩各有且必须有一次作为攻方；辩方由攻方任意指定，不受次数限制。攻辩双方必须单独完本轮攻辩，不得中途更替。 （3）攻辩双方必须正面回答对方问题，提问和问答都要简洁明确。每轮攻辩中被攻的一方不得反问。不得以提问影响对方答辩完整性，不得以长时间答辩阻止对方提问。主持人有权终止一方超时的提问或答辩。 （4）正反方选手站立完成第一轮攻辩阶段。攻辩双方任意一方落座视为完成本方攻辩，对方选手在限制时间内任意发挥（陈词或继续发问）。 （5）每一轮攻辩阶段为1分30秒，攻辩双方各自不做时间设定，时间剩余30秒时，给予提示，用时满时，终止发言。 （6）四轮攻辩阶段完毕，先由正方一辩作攻辩小结再由反方一辩为本队作攻辩小结，限时1分30秒。正反双方的攻辩小结要针对攻辩阶段的态势及涉及内容，严禁脱离比赛实际状况的背稿。 5．自由辩论。这一轮辩论，正反方辩手自动轮流发言，先有正方任何一名队员起立发言，发言辩手落座为发言结束即为另一方发言开始的计时标志，另一方辩手必须紧接着发言，若有间隙，累积时照常进行。同一方辩手的发言次序不限。如果一方时间已经用完，另一方可以继续发言，也可向主席示意放弃发言。自由辩论提倡积极交锋，对于对方已经明确回答的问题仍然纠缠不放的，适当扣分。6．结辩。辩论双方应针对辩论会整体形式进行总结陈词，脱离实际，背诵事先准备的稿件，适当扣分。
BP赛制 BP制是British Parliamentary（英国议会制）的简称，是仿照英国议会开会议事模式而设计的一系列辩论赛规则的总称，是全世界范围内使用最广泛的辩论规则，世界大学生辩论赛WUDC（The World Universities Debating Championships）及中国辩论公开赛China Open 均使用此规则。BP制中每个辩手都有7分钟来表达自己的见解。 发言顺序如下： 正方开篇陈述第一辩手“首相”或”正方领袖 反方开篇陈述第一辩手“反方领袖” 正方开篇陈述第二辩手“副首相”或”正方第二领袖” 反方开篇陈述第二辩手“反方第二领袖” 正方总结陈词第三辩手（即正方二队一辩）“正方成员” 反方总结陈词第三辩手（即反方二队一辩）“反方成员” 正方总结陈词第四辩手（即正方二队二辩）“正方党鞭” 反方总结陈词第四辩手（即反方二队二辩）“反方党鞭” 正方上院第一位发言者1st Proposition Team, 1st speaker 首相"Prime Minister" or "First Government Member" 反方上院第一位发言者1st Opposition Team, 1st speaker 反对党领袖"Leader of the Opposition" or "First Opposition Member" 正方上院第二位发言者1st Proposition Team, 2nd speaker 副首相"Deputy Prime Minister" or "Second Government Member" 反方上院第二位发言者1st Opposition Team, 2nd speaker 反对党副领袖"Deputy Leader of the Opposition" or "Second Opposition Member" 正方下院第一位发言者2nd Proposition Team, 1st speaker 政府阁员"Member for the Government" or "Third Government Member" 反方下院第一位发言者2nd Opposition Team, 1st speaker 反对党阁员"Member for the Opposition" or "Third Opposition Member" BP辩论最有趣之处在于8个人分为四组。执政党与反对党要对现行政策进行演讲式辩论，辩论过程中其对立面两个小组可以进行提问，经演讲者同意方可提问，辩论者可以选择不接受此次提问，但在自己表述的7分钟中需至少回答一个问题。而另外两组则需要在支持己方的前提下提出新的论点，并加以阐明。两方党边需要对辩论进行总结，并突出己方观点。总的来说，此种赛制还是一种很有趣味的赛制。 this house would THW
辩论赛流程和规则 辩题：惩罚对我们学生有利还是不利？ 辩论赛流程： 一、主席致辞 辩题相关背景资料；选手结合自己的辩题进行自我介绍；简单介绍比赛流程和规则。 二、比赛阶段 正方一辩发言（立论）（3分） 反方一辩发言（立论）（3分） （注：每方队员在用时剩余30 秒时，计时员提醒辩手，时间用完时，举红牌宣布终止发言。） 1 、正方二辩针对反方二辩或三辩提问。 2 、反方二辩针对正方二辩或三辩提问。 3 、正方三辩针对反方二辩或三辩提问。 4 、反方三辩针对正方二辩或三辩提问。 （注意：每一轮攻辩阶段为1分30秒，攻方每次提问不得超过10秒，每轮必须提出三个以上的问题。辩方每次回答不得超过20秒。用时满时，计时员举红牌宣布终止发言，不得再提问或回答。重复提问、回避问题均要被适当扣分） （特别注意：问者只能问，答者只能答） 正方一辩进行攻辩小结；（ 1 分30 秒） 反方一辩进行攻辩小结。（ 1 分30 秒） （注：攻辩小结阶段，在每方用时剩余10秒时，计时员提醒辩手，时间用完时，然后举红牌宣布终止发言。） 正反方辩手自动轮流发言。每方限时 5 分钟，双方总计10 分钟。发言辩手落座为发言结束即为另一方发言开始的记时标志，另一方辩手必须紧接着发言；若有间隙，累积计时照常进行。同一方辩手的发言次序不限。如果一方时间已经用完，另一方可以继续发言，也可向主席示意放弃发言。自由辩论提倡积极交锋，不能对重要问题回避交锋两次以上，对于对方已经明确回答的问题，不能纠缠不放。 （注：自由辩论阶段，每方使用时间剩余30秒时，计时员提醒；时间用完时，然后举红牌宣布终止发言。） 反方四辩总结陈词；（4分钟） 正方四辩总结陈词。（4分钟） （注：应有针对性的对辩论会整体态势进行总结。每方队员在用时剩余30秒时，计时员提醒，时间用完时，举红牌宣布终止发言。） 其它注意事项： 1、在辩论时不要随意打断别人的话； 2、不可进行人身攻击；
2011 Motions（104个motion） May 2011 Debate Motions for Dundee World Schools Debating Championships 2011, Aug Round 1 THW offer dictators immunity in return for leaving power. Round 2 THBT Universal Primary Education is misallocation of resources for the developing world. Round 3 THW legalize the sale of human organs. Round 4 THBT women can only achieve equality under a secular system of government. Motions from 1st China National High School English Debating Championships, July 1.THW require students in all high schools (secular, religious, public, private, etc.) learn the beliefs of people of all major faiths, including those of no faith at all (atheists/agnostics). 2.THW allow citizens to sell their organs. 3.THW make insults (offensive remarks) on people with disabilities a punishable crime. 4.THBT university students should pay the full costs of their education. 5.THW ban advertisements that use gender stereotypes. 6.THB Western Governments should assassinate dictatorial leaders who use violence against their own people to stay in power. 7.THBT all countries should give up the use of nuclear power. 8.THBT animals should not be used as objects of sport and entertainment. 9.THBT environmental protection should come second to economic growth in developing countries. 10. THBT prisoners should have the right to vote in general elections held to form a national parliament. 11. THBT the Arab World should stop selling oil to France until it removes its ban on the wearing of the Islamic Female Head Dress (Burqa) in public. 12. THW require users of online social networks to disclose their real identity. SDC Adademy in Slovenia, July 2011 1.Voting should be obligatory. 2.Youth should have their own political party. 3.We should lower the voting age to 16. 4.Youth should have a special seat in national parliaments. 5.Youth should have a special seat in national parliaments. 6.Representative democracy has failed us. 7.In elections the poor should have two votes. 8.E-elections would increase the participation of youth. 9.Civil disobedience is justified in democracies. 10. The democratic potential of the Internet is overvalued. 11. There would be no Arabic spring without the Internet. 12. A conscious consumer does for democracy more than a voter. 13. Invalidate any election result with a turnout below 70%. 14. Children should be excluded from any religion until adulthood. 15. Offer immediate EU candidates status to North African states on the precondition of democratic transition. 16. Give extra votes to younger people. 17. We support parents who secretly ins tall spyware on their children’s electronic devices. Install condom vending machines in all high schools.
大学辩论赛常规赛制流程 开场正反双方自我介绍 4辩代表XX队伍问候在场各位 正方1辩开篇立论（时间3分钟）。 反方4辩盘问正方1辩（时间1分30秒） 注：盘问即四辨向一辩提问，反方四辨拥有打断正方一辩的权利。答辩方只能作答不能反问反方1辩开篇立论（时间3分钟) 正方4辩盘问反方1辩（时间1分30秒） 正方2辩申论（2分30秒） 注：申论可以理解为进一步阐述双方观点。可以进一步阐述我方观点，也可以反驳对方观点反方2辩申论（2分30秒） 正反2辩对辩（各1分30秒） 注：和质询不同，双方均没有打断对方讲话的权利，一方发言时间完毕后另一方可继续发言，双方分开计时，以一方讲话结束为标准，开始计算另一方的时间。 正方3辩质询（2分30秒） 注：三辩可以质询对方1，2，4辩。答辩方只能作答不能反问，而质询方有权在任何时候中止答辩方。在开始前，先请对方1，2，4辩起立。在抛出问题后需要指定由对方哪位辩手回答。 反方3辩质询(2分30秒) 正方3辩质询小结（1分30秒） 注：是对质询的总结，对质询过程中对方出现的种种问题做出总结，指出对方的错误，以达到攻击对方论点的目的。 反方3辩质询小结（1分30秒） 自由辩论（时间各4分钟) 由正方开始发言。发言辩手落座为发言结束即为另一方发言开始的记时标志，另一方辩手必须紧接着发言；若有间隙，累积时照常进行。同一方辩手的发言次序不限。如果一方时间已经用完，另一方可以继续发言，也可向主席示意放弃发言。 注意双方均无打断对手或指定对方哪位辩手发言的权利。除非一方时间用完，不然绝对不可以出现连站的情况。
反方4辩总结陈词（3分钟） 注：是对整场比赛的总结，帮观众和评委梳理整场比赛，我们和对方在哪几个点上进行了交锋。我方哪几个点是占优势的，对方哪几个点是错的。最后调一两个点升华一下，带动气氛。 注，所有的环节都由正方先行发言。除了4辩总结由反方先发言。